Next Article in Journal
Classification of Holograms with 3D-CNN
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Property Test of Grass Carp Skin Material Based on the Digital Image Correlation Method
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Digital Single-Image Smartphone Assessment of Total Body Fat and Abdominal Fat Using Machine Learning

Sensors 2022, 22(21), 8365; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218365
by Gian Luca Farina 1,*, Carmine Orlandi 2, Henry Lukaski 3 and Lexa Nescolarde 4
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(21), 8365; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218365
Submission received: 2 October 2022 / Revised: 22 October 2022 / Accepted: 27 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report



The study is good, but the authors should address the following points.

1. Adding a new section to discuss relevant previous studies.

2. Indicate the most important main contributions in this study.

3. Add a figure to clearly explain the study methodology.

4. Tables 1 and 2 contain some characteristics acquired from the participants. The question is, are all the characteristics of the participants by means of pictures or some by a blood test?

5. The results should be explained more clearly and specify the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

6. Discussion about whether there are outliers or missing values and how they were addressed.

7. The Conclusion must be separated into a new section.


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The contribution of the paper is not clear, please rewrite it.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors have proposed a method based on machine learning which employs smartphones to estimate body fat. The manuscript is written well and the topic is interesting. I think the level of the work, its novelty, and significance is acceptable and I suggest publishing it as it is.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

The main contribution and proposed approach have some novelty in contribution. Revision in terms of technical details is needed before publication. So, some comments are suggested to describe technical details.

1. Your proposed approach is performed on smartphones. So, it is suggested to discuss about the runtime of your proposed approach briefly.

2. Is the performance of your proposed approach sensitive to distance of human and camera? Discuss in a clear way

3. As described in section 2.2, a deep learner is used for image analysis. Discuss briefly about the structure of used deep learner. (layer types, number of layers, number of output neurons, etc)

4. The final output of your proposed approach can be used in medical applications such as immunology parameters. For example, I find a paper entitled “Study some immunological parameters for Salmonella Typhi patients in Hilla city”, which has relation. Cite this paper and discuss about it as one of the advantages of your proposed approach.

5. The quality of the figure 3 is low.

6. What is the relation between white pixels and wright?

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept in present form

Reviewer 2 Report

I have no further comments.

Reviewer 4 Report

The revised version is better than original submission in terms of paper organization and technical details. Most of comments are considered in the revised text. The proposed method has enough novelty in methodology and contribution.

Back to TopTop