Next Article in Journal
Morphological Configuration of Sensory Biomedical Receptors Based on Structures Integrated by Electric Circuits and Utilizing Magnetic-Responsive Hybrid Fluid (HF)
Next Article in Special Issue
Pactolo Bar: An Approach to Mitigate the Midas Touch Problem in Non-Conventional Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
Multiscale Cascaded Attention Network for Saliency Detection Based on ResNet
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Hybrid Stylus: A Multi-Surface Active Stylus for Interacting with and Handwriting on Paper, Tabletop Display or Both
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Method for Recognizing Pressing Position and Shear Force Using Active Acoustic Sensing on Gel Plates

Sensors 2022, 22(24), 9951; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249951
by Hiroki Watanabe 1,*, Kaito Sasaki 2, Tsutomu Terada 2 and Masahiko Tsukamoto 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(24), 9951; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249951
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 10 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 16 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Human-Computer Interaction in Pervasive Computing Environments)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for reviewing our paper. We submit the response to the comments. Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors report two step recognition method for determining touch position and touch force using acoustic sensing. In this sensing, they transmit acoustic signals of various frequencies and analyze the emitted signal to elucidate the state of the sensing object. The proposed method utilizes simple set up consisting of gel plate and touch sensing module with acoustic wave generating speakers. Acoustic sensing is nothing new and several works published already on this field, however, the novelty of the work is sufficient due to the fact that the authors successfully managed to detect both position and sheer force using the construct. I recommend acceptance of the manuscript. The authors may consider the following minor points to improve their manuscript further:

1. the related work section or state-of-the-art is bit too long, I suggest a trimmed section here as some of the discussion goes to very basic and not totally relevant to a journal publication. 

2. The sampling frequency was chosen to be 96 kHz. Was it random? There was no justification given for that. 

3. Discussion on the gel , its physical and chemical properties are not presented. For a better understanding of the mechanism, the details of the gel must be provided. 

4. Also, the thickness of the gel layer was 5 mm, a better correlation could be achieved if the thickness could vary. 

5. I recommend a thorough English language check. Some sentences need rephrasing, e.g. the line 6-7. 

 

Author Response

Thank you for reviewing our paper. We submit the response to the comments. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop