Next Article in Journal
SCHC over LoRaWAN Efficiency: Evaluation and Experimental Performance of Packet Fragmentation
Next Article in Special Issue
Metal Oxide Chemiresistors: A Structural and Functional Comparison between Nanowires and Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Position Estimation Algorithm of Agricultural Mobile Robots Based on Multisensor Fusion and Autoencoder Neural Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Different Lanthanoid and Transition Metals in Perovskite Gas Sensors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 22
Issue 4
10.3390/s22041530
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impedance Spectroscopy of Hierarchical Porous Nanomaterials Based on por-Si, por-Si Incorporated by Ni and Metal Oxides for Gas Sensors

by
Anton Bobkov
*,
Victor Luchinin
,
Vyacheslav Moshnikov
,
Svetlana Nalimova
and
Yulia Spivak
Department of Micro- and Nanoelectronics, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Professor Popov Str. 5, 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(4), 1530; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041530
Submission received: 20 January 2022 / Revised: 8 February 2022 / Accepted: 11 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gas Sensors Based on Semiconductor Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Approaches are being developed to create composite materials with a fractal-percolation structure based on intercalated porous matrices to increase the sensitivity of adsorption gas sensors. Porous silicon, nickel-containing porous silicon, and zinc oxide have been synthesized as materials for such structures. Using the impedance spectroscopy method, it has been shown that the obtained materials demonstrate high sensitivity to organic solvent vapors and can be used in gas sensors. A model is proposed that explains the high sensitivity and inductive nature of the impedance at low frequencies, considering the structural features and fractal-percolation properties of the obtained oxide materials.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, monitoring of the air environment is an important task as transport and industrial facilities increasingly pollute it. There are various gas sensors such as thermocatalytic, optical, resistive, electrochemical, etc. The most sensitive ones are optical sensors [1], however, their wider use is limited by high cost. In terms of availability, the most attractive are semiconductor gas sensors. That’s why conductometric gas sensors are among the most widely studied and promising devices for detecting gases such as H2S [2,3], H2 [4,5], volatile organic compounds [6,7,8], NO2 [9,10] etc. Their working principle is based on the measurements of changes in the conductivity of the sensor layer when exposed to the detected gas. For typical n-type semiconductor, it is caused by the interaction with adsorbed gas molecules and the change in the concentration of electrons in the conduction band [11,12]. First, in ambient air, oxygen particles adsorb on the surface of the sensor layer. If the electron affinity of the adsorbed oxygen atom/molecule is higher than the work function of the semiconductor, then the electrons will transfer from the semiconductor to the adsorbed oxygen particles. Thus, the bands will bend in the sub-surface area. The thickness of depleted region depends on the Debye length. The mechanism of the reversible detection process is the chemical reaction between the gas molecules and adsorbed oxygen ions. As a result, the electrons transfer into the conduction band and the reaction products leave the surface in a neutral form. Thus, the concentration of target gas defines the difference in the conductivities of the sensor layer in the air and in the presence of gas molecules [13,14,15].
Conductometric sensors are simple, compact, cost-effective and easy-to-manufacture [16]. At the same time, an increase in their response is required for detecting low concentrations of target gases. Design of new material structure is a promising way to solve this problem. The most interesting approach is the development of materials with a fractal structure [17]. Fractal TiO2 gas sensor has excellent performance in acetone detection, which attributed to the high film porosity and fractal like network structures [18]. The processes of fractal structure formation have been considered in SiO2/SnOx/CuOy nanofilms prepared by the sol–gel method [19]. Maximum NO2 sensitivity appears at the ratio Sn/Cu = 6, when the processes of self-organization seem to be more active, resulting in transition of one type of fractal structure to another. ZnO/NiO fractal-percolation nanosystems were developed in [20]. From the example of methane and methanol, it has been shown that based on the character of the I–V curves it is possible to distinguish between different reducing gases. The opening or closing of the current flow channels occur due to the balance between physical and chemical processes at the nanosystems active centers in the presence of reducing gases and oxygen. An increase in sensor response of materials with fractal-percolation structure is achieved when the system in the form of a percolation cluster passes through the percolation threshold when interacting with gas [21].
Porous silicon (por-Si) is very promising as a matrix material for gas sensors due to its high surface to volume ratio and reactivity with the environment as well as its hierarchical porous texture with different pore sizes that can be tuned for certain goals and also due to facility of integration with silicon microchips [22,23,24,25,26].
It was shown that por-Si has a potential use in sensing of organic vapors and ammonia when covered with an oxide layer [22]. Graphene decorated por-Si showed enhanced sensing property to low-ppm H2 at room temperature in comparison to that of pristine por-Si [23]. The por-Si substrate with a large specific area was a sensor matrix and graphene was a catalyst material. Compositions based on porous silicon matrices intercalated with nickel and/or nickel oxide are also promising for “multi-response” sensor structures [27,28,29,30,31]. In this case, the properties (catalytic, magnetic, electrophysical, optical, etc.) and, accordingly, the response of such systems will depend both on the properties of the porous matrix, which determines the growth mechanism of the nickel phase, and on the conditions for the formation of nickel or its compounds.
Impedance spectroscopy is widely used to measure the response of gas sensors. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy has been applied to measure the H2S gas response of the sensor fabricated on reduced graphene oxide-incorporated nano-zinc oxide composites [32]. In [33] the complex impedance technique was established for proper adjustment of the operation frequency of the PANI-based gas sensor. Study of arrayed one-dimensional nickel nanowires using impedance spectroscopy revealed increase in resistance of the aligned nanowires at low frequencies by the adsorption of water and ethanol molecules [34]. The analysis of the dielectric permittivity spectra of macroporous silicon was carried out taking into account the structure of the material and showed the ejection of electrons from trapped states at 250 K [35]. The presence of a spectrum of localized states due to the defectiveness of the structure may suggest the existence of electrically active defects.
Thus, the aim of this work is to develop new approaches to increasing the sensitivity of adsorption gas sensors based on composites of porous silicon and nickel, as well as oxide materials in a fractal-percolation structure. In this work, layers of porous silicon functionalized with nickel, as well as zinc oxide with fractal-percolation structure were obtained. It is shown that these materials show a high response to organic solvent vapors and have the potential for use in gas sensors. A model is proposed that explains the high sensitivity values and the inductive nature of the impedance at low frequencies, taking into account the structural features and fractal-percolation properties of the obtained oxide materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Oxide Nanomaterials with Fractal-Percolation Structure

Nanostructured layers of ZnO were prepared via chemical coprecipitation method [36,37]. ZnO powder was synthesized from aqueous solution of Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O. An aqueous solution of NH4OH was added to the solution under stirring until pH = 7 was reached. To remove unreacted ions, dialysis of the suspension was carried out during 24 h. Precipitated suspension was placed into the dialysis tubing which was washed from the outside with distilled water. The content of the precipitated hydroxides remained constant, since the membrane is impermeable to them, and the unreacted ions gradually diffused into the water and were removed. The precipitate was centrifuged and washed with distilled water several times, then dried for 24 h at 80 °C and annealed for 3 h at 350 °C.

2.2. Synthesis of Porous Silicon Layers and Their Functionalization by Nickel

Porous silicon layers were obtained by electrochemical anodic etching. Monocrystalline p-Si (111) with a resistivity of 10 Ω cm was used as a substrate. An aqueous-alcohol (isopropanol) solution of hydrogen fluoride was used as an electrolyte. Electrochemical etching of silicon wafers was carried out in a 2-chamber cell of the Unno-Imai type; the scheme of the installation is given elsewhere [38,39,40]. The choice of technological conditions for etching is due to the results of previous studies [27,31,41]. With such a crystallographic orientation of silicon (Si (111)) and relatively low anodization current densities, the anodic dissolution of silicon will occur along the directions of the fastest etching (for silicon, this is a family of directions <100>). This will make it possible to form a system of pore channels with a dendritic-fractal type of porous texture. Technological conditions for obtaining layers of porous silicon are shown in Table 1.
Porous silicon layers were functionalized with nickel by means of two techniques: impregnation and electrochemical cathode deposition. Both methods are relatively simple, cheap, do not require expensive equipment, and while they are effective for producing nanomaterials, they are also effective for the functionalization of porous materials [42,43]. An aqueous-alcohol solution of nickel chloride (1% of salt) was used for functionalization. The ratio of water and isopropanol was chosen so that the electrolyte wetted the por-Si substrates.
The first technique of por-Si functionalization was the impregnation of porous silicon in the electrolyte described above for 7 days, then the samples were dried in air.
Another technique for Ni intercalation into porous silicon was electrochemical cathodic deposition. Electrochemical cathodic deposition was carried out using two-electrode electrochemical cell (Pt electrodes), the deposition potential was controlled using a PI-50-Pro-3 potentiostat/galvanostat (Elins LLC, Moscow, Russia). The synthesis conditions are specified in Table 1.

2.3. Por-Si/Ni Morphology and Optical Properties

Surface morphology and texture of porous silicon (porous layer thickness, shape, cross-sectional diameter and pore channel configuration) was studied using Helios Nanolab D449 Dual Beam electron microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Accelerating voltage was 10 kV, current was 0.17 nA. The image was obtained at an angle of 52 degrees.
The optical characteristics (refractive index) of Ni-containing por-Si were studied by the ellipsometry method [44]. Changes in the polarization state of electromagnetic radiation (λ = 632.8) when reflected from the sample was analyzed. The inverse task of ellipsometry method was solved (the effective optical characteristics of the layer (ε, n) were determined by the given geometric parameters of the sample (layer thickness)).

2.4. Impedance Spectroscopy Studies

Metal oxide powders were pressed into pellets for measurements. Electrical contacts are formed on the surface of por-Si layers and oxide pellets using contactol (3 g Art-№.530042, SILBERLEITLACK, Ferro GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany). Gas sensitive properties were studied under acetone, ethanol and isopropanol vapors exposure (1000 ppm).
Studies of the electrical properties of sensor materials were carried out using the impedance spectroscopy method. The frequency dependences of the complex resistance module and the phase shift angle between current and voltage in a capacitive circuit in the frequency range from 100 Hz to 500 kHz were measured using an impedance meter Z500P (Elins LLC). The air is supplied to the measuring cell by a compressor through a container with silica gel to dehumidify. Then part of the dried air flow passes through the bubbler, where it is mixed with vapors of liquid (acetone, alcohol or isopropanol). The required concentration of the detected gas is set by changing the ratio of air flows (pure and with organic solvent vapors). The impedance was presented on the complex plane in the form of dependencies of the real and imaginary components of the complex resistance.
The sensor responses in the frequency range from 100 Hz to 500 kHz were calculated as SIm = Im(Z)air/Im(Z)gas, where Zair, Zgas are complex resistances in the air atmosphere and in the presence of a target gas, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Por-Si Microstructure

Figure 1 shows the microstructure of a typical por-Si sample synthesized under conditions presented in Table 1. Figure 1 demonstrates the peculiar texture of the porous layer: one can observe a family of pore channels propagating at an angle of ≈45 degrees with respect to the surface; pore channels develop in the direction of the crystallographic direction that dissolves fastest (for silicon, this is <100> system of directions). At the same time, the pores demonstrate a well-defined square shape in cross-section. The pore channels show a dendritic character. According to Figure 1 at various magnifications of SEM, branching up to 4th level could be observed, while the pore sizes at different levels were: (1) 220–330 nm (macropores), (2) 60–70 nm (macropores), (3) 40–50 nm (mesopores) and (4) 20–30 nm (mesopores). The porosity is uniform in the thickness of the layer, the boundary with monocrystalline silicon is uniform, clear. The thickness of the porous layer is ≈40 microns.
It should be noted that after the treatment of porous silicon layers in a nickel electrolyte by both techniques, according to the SEM data, no significant change in morphology was observed. At the same time, organoleptic analysis showed a change in color (from gray-black, typical for porous silicon of this series, to yellowish-greenish (after treatment in a nickel electrolyte).

3.2. Investigation of the Refractive Index of por-Si and por-Si/Ni

Changes in the optical properties of porous silicon as a result of its functionalization by nickel are presented in Table 2. In this case, the method is effective for indirect observation of the presence of small amounts of nickel by changing the refractive index.
It is shown that the refractive index of por-Si is close to the one of SiO2 because silicon is oxidized in air, and porous silicon is oxidized even more intensively as it has a large specific surface area. It is well-known that its oxide (SiO2, SiOx) is always present on the surface of por-Si in air [45].
The evaluation of the refractive index (n) of nickel-containing layers of porous silicon showed that n of such samples is more than 2.54, which is significantly higher than the values of the initial porous silicon (≈1.45–1.54). Thus, the ellipsometry method is sensitive to the presence of small amounts of the nickel-containing phase in porous silicon.
It was found that with an increase in the impregnation time of por-Si in nickel chloride solution, n increases (from n = 2.54 after 7 days to n = 3.11 after 36 days). It was suggested that nickel ions bind oxygen on the surface of porous silicon, thus the refractive approaches the one of silicon (nSi = 3.4).

3.3. Impedance Spectroscopy of por-Si and por-Si/Ni

The samples were studied using impedance spectroscopy in an air atmosphere, in the presence of acetone and isopropanol vapors at 78 °C. Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the frequency dependences of the real and imaginary components of the impedance, as well as the Nyquist plot for por-Si and por-Si functionalized with nickel by two different methods.
The sensor responses to acetone and isopropanol vapors calculated from the imaginary part of impedance are shown in Table 3.
It was found that both the real and imaginary parts of the impedance increase in the presence of reducing gas vapors because the initial Si is a p-type semiconductor. Besides, if NiO is formed during functionalization, it is also a p-type material semiconductor.
The sensor responses of por-Si treated with a nickel solution to various gases depend on the processing method. Por-Si/Ni, functionalized by impregnation into a nickel-containing solution, has response to acetone vapor close to the one of untreated por-Si, while its response to isopropanol vapor is significantly higher (472.73). The response of por-Si/Ni functionalized by electrochemical deposition to both gases is almost the same and several times higher than the response of por-Si. The different responces of por-Si/Ni is probably due the presence of different phases of nickel (Ni or NiO).

3.4. Impedance Spectroscopy of Metal Oxides with Fractal Percolation Structure

Figure 5 shows changes in electric properties of zinc oxide pellet in wide frequency range in the air atmosphere (Figure 5a) and in the presence of acetone and ethanol vapors (Figure 5b) at 350 °C.
Figure 6 shows Nyquist plots for ZnO pellet in the air atmosphere (Figure 6a) and in the presence of acetone and ethanol vapors (Figure 6b) at 350 °C. It was revealed that the highest sensor response to ethanol vapors is 2449 at 47 Hz. The highest response to acetone vapors is 5243 at 10 Hz.
It was found that Nyquist plots in the presence of reducing gases shows inductive behavior in the low-frequency region and impedance hodographs shift in the IV quarter of the trigonometric circle. This fact is apparently related to the fractal nature of the sensor metal oxide layers, characterized by the formation of a percolation merged cluster near the percolation threshold.

3.5. Fractal Model of Porous Sensor Materials

The growth and assembly of grains during coprecipitation lead to the formation of pores with fractal surface [46,47]. The nature of assembly at the initial stages of synthesis is the main factor determining the emergence of fractal structures. Brownian motion of particles occurs under conditions of diffusion-limited aggregation. At co-precipitation in an aqueous medium OH-groups remain in the structure. Then they evaporate as a result of drying and annealing, leading to the formation of a porous structure.
The changes in electric properties of sensor materials are usually interpreted using the following model. Depleted layer is formed in the subsurface area with the thickness of Debye length. If the gas-sensitive layer consists of grains smaller in size than the Debye length or grains whose modulated contact area is comparable to the cross-sectional area at the grain boundary, then it has high sensor response. However, it is not possible to explain the response value to acetone within this model.
The observed effects can be explained by the formation of a percolation merged cluster under conditions slightly exceeding the percolation threshold. The technical devices implemented at the percolation threshold are certainly of great interest [48,49,50,51]. In such structures, when interacting with oxygen, the percolation cluster breaks off. So, the gas-sensitive layer has a fractal structure before the percolation threshold and the electrical resistance of the layer can be very high. When interacting with the reducing gases, the effective conductivity will correspond to the state after the percolation threshold. Within the framework of the percolation cluster model with a structure at the percolation threshold, there are no fundamental limitations in the values of gas response.
According to the Mandelbrot-Given model, the fractal contains the same elements as the percolation cluster [52]. The Mandelbrot-Given model was proposed because its Hausdorff fractal dimension is close to the value corresponding to the fractal properties of an infinite cluster in two-dimensional space. The forming element for this curve divides a linear segment into parts of length r = 1/3 and connects them into a loop consisting of three parts, to which two branches are attached (Figure 7). The Mandelbrot-Given curve is interesting because it has loops and branches of all possible sizes. At each iteration, the generating element replaces each linear link with N = 8 links reduced by a third. Thus, the Mandelbrot-Given curve has a fractal dimension D = ln8/ln3 = 1.89 [53].
The experimental results can be explained by the formation of a percolation merged cluster in a state slightly after the percolation threshold. The cluster power can be described qualitatively by the Mandelbrot-Given model. If the voltage is applied between the left and right ends of the structure shown in Figure 6, then the current flow through only through the backbone of the structure. The remaining parts are “dead ends”, which corresponds to the real structure of nanomaterials. The electric properties of a percolation cluster close to the percolation threshold are determined by the fractal properties of its backbone (Figure 8), i.e., the curve excluding branches connected to the initial linear segment with one end. The Hausdorff fractal dimension for the conducting backbone is close to the corresponding value for the Sierpinsky napkin (D = 1.62). Thus, the fractal gas-sensitive structure exists in two-dimensional space and has a topological dimension equal to one, thus the blocking of the flow paths is possible during adsorption charged oxygen ions on the surface of sensor layer.
When the material is in the air atmosphere, oxygen chemisorption occurs on its surface, which leads to blocking of some conductive fractal branches, and, as a consequence, the transition of the system to a state before the percolation threshold characterized by a high resistance. When reducing gas molecules appear, they are adsorbed on the surface of the material and react with oxygen. The reaction products are desorbed from the surface and the flow paths are unblocked. Thus, the system transfers through the percolation threshold, the current flow path length decreases and consequently resistance also significantly decreases. When the conductive branches are unblocked, random loops of all possible sizes are formed.
Figure 9 illustrates two possible states of the system with different values of resistance in different atmospheric conditions. The dependence of the resistance on the fraction of conducting particles in the system can be described by the following equation:
R ~ 1/(x − xc)t,
where t is the critical index of electrical conductivity (t2 = 1.3 for the space dimension d = 2 and t3 = 1.6–1.7 for d = 3), xc is the percolation threshold. It should be noted that in real nanomaterials in the state close to the percolation threshold xc value is variable, so gas-sensitive properties are instable and can be different for similar samples.
As can be seen from the model scheme of the Mandelbrot-Given percolation cluster, system includes loops of various diameters. At high frequencies, the loops almost do not participate in the charge carrier transport, since they have inductive character. At low frequencies, on the contrary, loop paths become more preferred compared to capacitive ones, which in real structure are dielectric layers between conductive semiconductor grains. Thus, the inductive nature of impedance spectroscopy at low frequencies follows from the above scheme. After long annealing or at higher concentration of precursor solution the fractal character disappears.
Of course, this model only qualitatively describes properties of gas sensor layers. In addition, in the model, the appearance of Debye depleted region still remains. Thus, it develops well-known models, expanding the range of effects explained. Blocking the current flow paths involves the exclusion of branches with a cross-section less than the effective Debye length. This model also confirms that in adsorption semiconductor sensors with a fractal structure, the gas response can significantly exceed the highest value according to model with classical modulation of the conductivity of sub-surface layers.

4. Conclusions

The fractal-percolation structures based on nanostructured layers of zinc oxide and layers of porous silicon functionalized with nickel were obtained. Meso-/macroporous silicon with fractal-dendritic type of pore channels (with at least four levels of hierarchical branching pores) were obtained by electrochemical anode etching of p-SI (111). The treatment of porous silicon layers with an aqueous isopropanol solution of nickel chloride was carried out by two techniques: the impregnation method and electrochemical cathodic deposition. It is shown by SEM data that the treatment of porous silicon in a nickel solution (by either technique) does not lead to noticeable changes in the morphology of the porous layer, nevertheless, the refractive index and impedance characteristics of such samples change noticeably both in air and in the presence of organic volatile substances (acetone, isopropanol).
Nickel deposition in porous silicon increases the sensitivity of the samples to isopropyl alcohol vapors. Moreover, the sensitivity (the contribution to the impedance due to the interaction with nickel) is greater, when the processing time for samples obtained by both methods is longer.
The highest response of ZnO to acetone vapors was 5243 at 10 Hz, while to ethanol vapors it is 2449 at 47 Hz. The obtained gas sensing response values are explained within the framework of a model that takes into account the fractal nature of nanostructured powders and the transition through the percolation threshold in an atmosphere containing a reducing gas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M.; methodology, Y.S. and V.M.; software, A.B.; validation, S.N. and Y.S.; formal analysis, A.B.; investigation, Y.S., A.B. and S.N.; resources, V.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S. and S.N.; writing—review and editing, A.B.; visualization, A.B.; supervision, V.L.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Development program of ETU “LETI” within the framework of the program of strategic academic leadership” Priority-2030 No 075-15-2021-1318 on 29 September 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, X.; Qiao, S.; Ma, Y. Highly sensitive methane detection based on light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy with a 2.33 µm diode laser and adaptive Savitzky-Golay filtering. Opt. Exp. 2022, 30, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vasiliev, R.B.; Rumyantseva, M.N.; Yakovlev, N.V.; Gaskov, A.M. CuO/SnO2 thin film heterostructures as chemical sensors to H2S. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1998, 50, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rumyantseva, M.N.; Vladimirova, S.A.; Platonov, V.B.; Chizhov, A.S.; Gaskov, A.M.; Batuk, M.; Hadermann, J.; Khmelevsky, N.O. Sub-ppm H2S sensing by tubular ZnO-Co3O4 nanofibers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 307, 127624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Maksimova, N.K.; Sevastyanov, E.Y.; Chernikov, E.V.; Korusenko, P.M.; Nesov, S.N.; Kim, S.V.; Biryukov, A.A.; Sergeychenko, N.V.; Davletkildeev, N.A.; Sokolov, D.V. Sensors based on tin dioxide thin films for the detection of pre-explosive hydrogen concentrations. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 341, 130020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haviar, S.; Kumar, N.; Batková, Š.; Čapek, J. Nanostructured Materials Based on Thin Films and Nanoclusters for Hydrogen Gas Sensing. Proceedings 2020, 56, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nemufulwi, M.I.; Swart, H.C.; Mhlongo, G.H. Evaluation of the effects of Au addition into ZnFe2O4 nanostructures on acetone detection capabilities. Mater. Res. Bull. 2021, 142, 111395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roshan, H.; Kuchi, P.S.; Sheikhi, M.H.; Mirzaei, A. Enhancement of room temperature ethanol sensing behavior of PbS–SnS2 nanocomposite by Au decoration. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Processing 2021, 127, 105742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Lin, S.; Li, T.; Rumyantseva, M.N.; Gaskov, A.M. Room temperature formaldehyde sensing of hollow SnO2/ZnO heterojunctions under UV-led activation. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 7207–7214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martyshov, M.N.; Forsh, E.A.; Marikutsa, A.V.; Forsh, P.A.; Rumyantseva, M.N.; Gaskov, A.M.; Kashkarov, P.K. Influence of In2O3 nanocrystals size on the sensitivity to NO2. J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron. 2011, 6, 452–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chizhov, A.S.; Mordvinova, N.E.; Rumyantseva, M.N.; Gaskov, A.M.; Krylov, I.V.; Drozdov, K.A.; Li, X. The effect of CdSe and InP quantum dots on the interaction of ZnO with NO2 under visible light irradiation. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 63, 512–518. [Google Scholar]
  11. Korotcenkov, G. Electrospun Metal Oxide Nanofibers and Their Conductometric Gas Sensor Application. Part 2: Gas Sensors and Their Advantages and Limitations. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Marikutsa, A.; Rumyantseva, M.; Konstantinova, E.A.; Gaskov, A. The Key Role of Active Sites in the Development of Selective Metal Oxide Sensor Materials. Sensors 2021, 21, 2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Moshnikov, V.A.; Gracheva, I.E.; Kuznezov, V.V.; Maximov, A.I.; Karpova, S.S.; Ponomareva, A.A. Hierarchical nanostructured semiconductor porous materials for gas sensors. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2010, 356, 2020–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nikolic, M.V.; Milovanovic, V.; Vasiljevic, Z.Z.; Stamenkovic, Z. Semiconductor Gas Sensors: Materials, Technology, Design, and Application. Sensors 2020, 20, 6694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bobkov, A.; Moshnikov, V.; Varezhnikov, A.; Plugin, I.; Fedorov, F.S.; Goffman, V.; Sysoev, V.; Trouillet, V.; Geckle, U.; Sommer, M. The multisensor array based on grown-on-chip zinc oxide nanorod network for selective discrimination of alcohol vapors at sub-ppm range. Sensors 2019, 19, 4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Korotcenkov, G.; Cho, B.K. Metal oxide composites in conductometric gas sensors: Achievements and challenges Sens. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 244, 182–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kononova, I.; Kononov, P.; Moshnikov, V.; Ignat’ev, S. Fractal-Percolation Structure Architectonics in Sol-Gel Synthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sabri, Y.M.; Kandjani, A.E.; Rashid, S.; Harrison, C.J.; Ippolito, S.J.; Bhargava, S.K. Soot template TiO2 fractals as a photoactive gas sensor for acetone detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 275, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Plugotarenko, N.K.; Petrov, V.V.; Ivanetz, V.A.; Smirnov, V.A. Investigation of the Formation of Fractal Structures in SiO2 ⋅ SnOx ⋅ CuOy Thin Films Prepared by the Sol–Gel Method. Glass Phys. Chem. 2011, 37, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kornyushchenko, A.; Kosminska, Y.; Shevchenko, S.; Wilde, G.; Perekrestov, V. Structural, Morphological and Sensor Properties of the Fractal-Percolation Nanosystem ZnO/NiO. J. Electron. Mater. 2021, 50, 2268–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moshnikov, V.A.; Nalimova, S.S.; Seleznev, B.I. Gas-sensitive layers based on fractal-percolation structures. Semiconductors 2014, 48, 1499–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baran, N.; Gebavi, H.; Mikac, L.; Ristić, D.; Gotić, M.; Ali Syed, K.; Ivanda, M. Sensing Properties of Oxidized Nanostructured Silicon Surface on Vaporized Molecules. Sensors 2019, 19, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Eom, N.S.A.; Cho, H.-B.; Song, Y.; Lee, W.; Sekino, T.; Cho, Y.-H. Room-Temperature H2 Gas Sensing Characterization of Graphene-Doped Porous Silicon via a Facile Solution Dropping Method. Sensors 2017, 17, 2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Choi, M.S.; Mirzaei, A.; Bang, J.H.; Oum, W.; Kwon, Y.J.; Kim, J.-H.; Choi, S.-W.; Kim, S.S.; Kim, H.W. Selective H2S-sensing performance of Si nanowires through the formation of ZnO shells with Au functionalization. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 289, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kwon, Y.J.; Choi, S.-W.; Kang, S.Y.; Choi, M.S.; Bang, J.H.; Kim, S.S.; Kim, H.W. Enhancement of the benzene-sensing performance of Si nanowires through the incorporation of TeO2 heterointerfaces and Pd-sensitization. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 244, 1085–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Smerdov, R.S.; Spivak, Y.M.; Moshnikov, V.A.; Mustafaev, A.S. Magnetic and Plasmonic Composite Nanostructures for Creating Optical Filters at Substance and Material Diagnostics Systems. J. Russ. Univ. Radioelectron. 2021, 24, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bejide, M.; Contreras, P.; Homm, P.; Duran, B.; García-Merino, J.A.; Rosenkranz, A.; Denardin, J.C.; del Río, R.; Hevia, S.A. Nickel Nanopillar Arrays Electrodeposited on Silicon Substrates Using Porous Alumina Templates. Molecules 2020, 25, 5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Granitzer, P.; Rumpf, K.; Reissner, M.; Michor, H. Metal Filled Light Emitting Porous Silicon as Platform for Tunable Optical and Magnetic Properties. In ECS Meeting Abstracts; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; p. 1434. [Google Scholar]
  29. Soboleva, E.; Geydt, P.; Zakharchuk, I.; Spivak, Y.; Moshnikov, V.; Lähderanta, E. Properties of porous silicon precipitated with nickel for gas sensors. Sens. Lett. 2018, 16, 672–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, X.; Tu, K.N. Preparation of hierarchically porous nickel from macroporous silicon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15036–15037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moshnikov, V.A.; Gracheva, I.E.; Lenshin, A.S.; Spivak, Y.M.; Anchkov, M.G.; Kuznetsov, V.V.; Olchowik, J.M. Porous silicon with embedded metal oxides for gas sensing applications. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2012, 358, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Balasubramani, V.; Sureshkumar, S.; Subba Rao, T.; Sridhar, T.M. Impedance Spectroscopy-Based Reduced Graphene Oxide-Incorporated ZnO Composite Sensor for H2S Investigations. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 9976–9982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Santos, M.C.; Bianchi, A.G.C.; Ushizima, D.M.; Pavinatto, F.J.; Bianchi, R.F. Ammonia gas sensor based on the fre-quency-dependent impedance characteristics of ultrathin polyaniline films. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2017, 253, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Mohammadi, M.; Fardindoost, S.; Irajizad, A.; Almasi-Kashi, M. Room temperature selective sensing of aligned Ni nan-owires using impedance spectroscopy. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 25044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Castro, R.; Spivak, Y.; Shevchenko, S.; Moshnikov, V. Low-Frequency Dielectric Relaxation in Structures Based on Macroporous Silicon with Meso-Macroporous Skin-Layer. Materials 2021, 14, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karpova, S.S.; Moshnikov, V.A.; Mjakin, S.V.; Kolovangina, E.S. Surface functional composition and sensor properties of ZnO, Fe2O3, and ZnFe2O4. Semiconductors 2013, 47, 392–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karpova, S.S.; Moshnikov, V.A.; Maksimov, A.I.; Mjakin, S.V.; Kazantseva, N.E. Study of the effect of the acid-base surface properties of ZnO, Fe2O3 and ZnFe2O4 oxides on their gas sensitivity to ethanol vapor. Semiconductors 2013, 47, 1026–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Travkin, P.G.; Sokolova, E.N.; Spivak, Y.M.; Moshnikov, V.A. Electrochemical Cell for the Production of Porous Anode Oxides of Metals and Semiconductors. RU Patent 122385 U1, 27 November 2012. Application No. 2012122692/02 dated 1 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lenshin, A.S.; Kashkarov, V.M.; Spivak, Y.M.; Moshnikov, V.A. Investigations of nanoreactors on the basis of p-type porous silicon: Electron structure and phase composition. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 135, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smerdov, R.; Spivak, Y.; Bizyaev, I.; Somov, P.; Gerasimov, V.; Mustafaev, A.; Moshnikov, V. Advances in Novel Low-Macroscopic Field Emission Electrode Design Based on Fullerene-Doped Porous Silicon. Electronics 2021, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Spivak, Y.M.; Myakin, S.V.; Moshnikov, V.A.; Panov, M.F.; Belorus, A.O.; Bobkov, A.A. Surface functionality features of porous silicon prepared and treated in different conditions. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 2629582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Eftekhari, A. (Ed.) Nanostructured Materials in Electrochemistry; WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2008; p. 463. [Google Scholar]
  43. Canham, L. Handbook of Porous Silicon; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  44. Avrov, D.D.; Gorlyak, A.N.; Lebedev, A.O.; Luchinin, V.V.; Markov, A.V.; Panov, M.F.; Osipov, A.V.; Kukushkin, S.A. Comparative ellipsometric analysis of silicon carbide polytypes 4H, 15R, AND 6H produced by a modified lely method in the same growth process. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2020, 46, 968–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Astrova, E.V.; Voronkov, V.B.; Remenyuk, A.D.; Shuman, V.B.; Tolmachev, V.A. Variation of the parameters and composition of thin films of porous silicon as a result of oxidation: Ellipsometric studies. Semiconductors 1999, 33, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kravchyk, K.V.; Gomza, Y.P.; Pashkova, O.V.; V’yunov, O.I.; Nesin, S.D.; Belous, A.G. Effect of synthesis conditions on the fractal structure of yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2009, 355, 2557–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yapryntsev, A.D.; Gubanova, N.N.; Kopitsa, G.P.; Baranchikov, A.Y.; Kuznetsov, S.V.; Fedorov, P.P.; Ivanov, V.K.; Ezdakova, K.V.; Pipich, V. Mesostructure of yttrium and aluminum basic salts coprecipitated from aqueous solutions under ultrasonic treatment. J. Surf. Investig. X-Ray Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2016, 10, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Emtsev, V.V.; Gushchina, E.V.; Petrov, V.N.; Tal’Nishnih, N.A.; Chernyakov, A.E.; Shabunina, E.I.; Shmidt, N.M.; Usikov, A.S.; Kartashova, A.P.; Zybin, A.A.; et al. Diversity of Properties of Device Structures Based on Group-III Nitrides, Related to Modification of the Fractal-Percolation System. Semiconductors 2018, 52, 942–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Armitage, B.I.; Murugappan, K.; Lefferts, M.J.; Cowsik, A.; Castell, M.R. Conducting polymer percolation gas sensor on a flexible substrate. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 12669–12676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jaafar, A.H.; O’Neill, M.; Kelly, S.M.; Verrelli, E.; Kemp, N.T. Percolation Threshold Enables Optical Resistive-Memory Switching and Light-Tuneable Synaptic Learning in Segregated Nanocomposites. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019, 5, 1900197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sarkar, A.; Rahaman, A.B.; Chakraborty, K.; Pal, T.; Ghosh, D. Banerjee Organic heterojunctions of phthalocyanine-reduced graphene oxide above percolation threshold for photovoltaic application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 253, 123418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mandelbrot, B.B.; Given, J.A. Physical properties of a new fractal model of percolation clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1984, 1984, 1853–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Feder, J. Fractals; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Sensors 22 01530 g001 550
Figure 1. (a–c) SEM images of por-Si at different magnification (p-por-Si (111), JA = 20 mA/cm2  t = 10 min) ((d) shows the fragment marked by white square marker at (c)).
Figure 1. (a–c) SEM images of por-Si at different magnification (p-por-Si (111), JA = 20 mA/cm2  t = 10 min) ((d) shows the fragment marked by white square marker at (c)).
Sensors 22 01530 g001
Sensors 22 01530 g002 550
Figure 2. Impedance characteristics of por-Si: (a)—frequency dependence of Re(Z), (b)—frequency dependence of Im(Z), (c)—Nyquist plot.
Figure 2. Impedance characteristics of por-Si: (a)—frequency dependence of Re(Z), (b)—frequency dependence of Im(Z), (c)—Nyquist plot.
Sensors 22 01530 g002
Sensors 22 01530 g003 550
Figure 3. Impedance characteristics of por-Si functionalized with Ni by impregnation: (a)—frequency dependence of Re(Z), (b)—frequency dependence of Im(Z), (c)—Nyquist plot.
Figure 3. Impedance characteristics of por-Si functionalized with Ni by impregnation: (a)—frequency dependence of Re(Z), (b)—frequency dependence of Im(Z), (c)—Nyquist plot.
Sensors 22 01530 g003
Sensors 22 01530 g004a 550Sensors 22 01530 g004b 550
Figure 4. Impedance characteristics of por-Si functionalized with Ni by electrochemical deposition: (a)—frequency dependence of Re(Z), (b)—frequency dependence of Im(Z), (c)—Nyquist plot.
Figure 4. Impedance characteristics of por-Si functionalized with Ni by electrochemical deposition: (a)—frequency dependence of Re(Z), (b)—frequency dependence of Im(Z), (c)—Nyquist plot.
Sensors 22 01530 g004aSensors 22 01530 g004b
Sensors 22 01530 g005 550
Figure 5. Frequency dependence of real and imaginary parts of impedance of ZnO: (a)—in air, (b)—in acetone and ethanol vapors.
Figure 5. Frequency dependence of real and imaginary parts of impedance of ZnO: (a)—in air, (b)—in acetone and ethanol vapors.
Sensors 22 01530 g005
Sensors 22 01530 g006 550
Figure 6. Nyquist plots of ZnO: (a)—in air, (b)—in acetone and ethanol vapors.
Figure 6. Nyquist plots of ZnO: (a)—in air, (b)—in acetone and ethanol vapors.
Sensors 22 01530 g006
Sensors 22 01530 g007 550
Figure 7. Mandelbrot-Given fractal.
Figure 7. Mandelbrot-Given fractal.
Sensors 22 01530 g007
Sensors 22 01530 g008 550
Figure 8. Backbone of Mandelbrot-Given curve.
Figure 8. Backbone of Mandelbrot-Given curve.
Sensors 22 01530 g008
Sensors 22 01530 g009 550
Figure 9. Dependences of the power and reduced conductivity of the percolation cluster.
Figure 9. Dependences of the power and reduced conductivity of the percolation cluster.
Sensors 22 01530 g009
Table
Table 1. Technological conditions for obtaining por-Si and its functionalization by Ni.
Table 1. Technological conditions for obtaining por-Si and its functionalization by Ni.
NoPor-Si Synthesis ConditionsNi Functionalization Conditions
JA, mA/sm2t, minMethodElectrolyte/SolutionU, Vt, min
I2010Electro-chemical deposition1:10:10
NiCl2:H2O:
C3H7OH		1030
II155
IIIImpregnation-Impregnation time
Table
Table 2. Refractive index of por-Si and por-Si/Ni.
Table 2. Refractive index of por-Si and por-Si/Ni.
SampleNi Functionalization MethodImpregnation Time, DaysRefractive Index
Por-SiImpregnation-1.414
-1.586
Por-Si/Ni72.540
212.723
363.107
Table
Table 3. Maximum values of por-Si and por-Si/Ni sensor responses.
Table 3. Maximum values of por-Si and por-Si/Ni sensor responses.
SampleAcetoneIsopropanol
Sf, HzSf, Hz
Por-Si1.5810522.681103
Por-Si/Ni (impregnation)1.281839472.731359
Por-Si/Ni (electrochemical cathode deposition)7.6410056.241155
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bobkov, A.; Luchinin, V.; Moshnikov, V.; Nalimova, S.; Spivak, Y. Impedance Spectroscopy of Hierarchical Porous Nanomaterials Based on por-Si, por-Si Incorporated by Ni and Metal Oxides for Gas Sensors. Sensors 2022, 22, 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041530

AMA Style

Bobkov A, Luchinin V, Moshnikov V, Nalimova S, Spivak Y. Impedance Spectroscopy of Hierarchical Porous Nanomaterials Based on por-Si, por-Si Incorporated by Ni and Metal Oxides for Gas Sensors. Sensors. 2022; 22(4):1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041530

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bobkov, Anton, Victor Luchinin, Vyacheslav Moshnikov, Svetlana Nalimova, and Yulia Spivak. 2022. "Impedance Spectroscopy of Hierarchical Porous Nanomaterials Based on por-Si, por-Si Incorporated by Ni and Metal Oxides for Gas Sensors" Sensors 22, no. 4: 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041530

APA Style

Bobkov, A., Luchinin, V., Moshnikov, V., Nalimova, S., & Spivak, Y. (2022). Impedance Spectroscopy of Hierarchical Porous Nanomaterials Based on por-Si, por-Si Incorporated by Ni and Metal Oxides for Gas Sensors. Sensors, 22(4), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041530

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop