Next Article in Journal
Identifying Voice Individuality Unaffected by Age-Related Voice Changes during Adolescence
Next Article in Special Issue
Acoustic Emission Source Location Using Finite Element Generated Delta-T Mapping
Previous Article in Journal
A New Digital Platform for Collecting Measurement Data from the Novel Imaging Sensors in Urology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling and Analysis of Acoustic Emission Generated by Fatigue Cracking
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A New Probabilistic Ellipse Imaging Method Based on Adaptive Signal Truncation for Ultrasonic Guided Wave Defect Localization on Pressure Vessels

Sensors 2022, 22(4), 1540; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041540
by Qinfei Li, Zhi Luo, Gangyi Hu and Shaoping Zhou *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(4), 1540; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041540
Submission received: 19 January 2022 / Revised: 11 February 2022 / Accepted: 12 February 2022 / Published: 17 February 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents new algorithm of damage detection and localization based on ultrasonic waves propagation and probabilistic ellipse imaging method. The paper is interesting for researchers involved in the area of SHM. I didn't find any methodological or technical errors in the article. Also I didn't find any parts of the presentation which are unclear for potential readers. Nevertheless in my opinion the cited bibliography is very limited. Many paper utilizing ultrasonic waves and distributed sensors for damage detection  have been published - for example teams Radzienski, Ostachowicz, Fu Kuo Chang, Boller, etc. I think that the bibliography should be extended on proper papers. Also the size of few Figures can be enlarge in order to improve their visibility

Author Response

We would like to thank the reviewers for your careful read and thoughtful comments on previous draft. We have carefully taken your comments into consideration in preparing our revision, which makes this article clearer and more compelling.

Combined with your comments, we have compiled the references. We have also edited some of the images in the article to improve their visibility.Thanks again for your reading and comments.

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall, the technical portion of the paper was good but there are numerous corrections that need to be made.  The misspelled words should have been caught by the spell checker, so turn on spell checking.  The fonts in many of the figures are too small to be read.  Increase the fonts, or size of the figure to make them more readable.  See attached file for corrections.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

We would like to thank the reviewers for your careful read and thoughtful comments on previous draft. We have carefully taken your comments into consideration in preparing our revision, which makes this article clearer and more compelling. Sentence problems and image and table formatting problems have been corrected in the article. Attachment is our response to the comments. Thanks again for all your comments and questions. Please feel free to contact us if any of the answers  are unclear.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop