Next Article in Journal
Elimination of Leaf Angle Impacts on Plant Reflectance Spectra Using Fusion of Hyperspectral Images and 3D Point Clouds
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Aviation Safety Prediction Based on Variable Selection and LSTM
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Impact of Physical Motion Cues on Driver Braking Performance: A Clinical Study Using Driving Simulator and Eye Tracker

Sensors 2023, 23(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010042
by Sara El Hamdani *, Petr Bouchner, Tereza Kunclova and David Lehet
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010042
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 17 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is having the good work done, however

the Authors should work more on the literature review and collect the recent works done on driver remarkable findings and also what are the recent eye tracking systems used in the existing Systems.

The Authors may refer to some of the recent works like 

Optimized feature extraction for precise sign gesture recognition using self-improved genetic algorithm

1. A Neural Network Approach for Indoor Fingerprinting-Based Localization

It is very much required if the authors can clearly indicate on the process of eye tracking and functioning of drivers iability in terms of braking Systems.

Authors should the simulators for the correct tracking system and driver braking Technology. 

The Authors could consider the equation 3 and 4 and why they have used them, they should provide a justification for the same.

 

Author Response

The Report to Reviewer 1 is attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1) I think the keywords are too many. Please use most important and relevant keywords in the abstract.

2) Line 82, this is “Device”, not “Divice”.

3) Line 84, this is “Moreover”, not “Moreove”. Please check carefully throughout the text.

4) Please place Figure 1 and 2 after 2.1.

5) Line 86 to 91: Why did you report the results of this study at the end of Introduction?

6) Please reconsider the arrangement of section 2 (Materials and Methods). I suggest that you begin with Participants, Simulator and Motion Platform, and then Instruments (including eye-tracker and questionnaires), ……

7) I did not observe a section regarding “Data Analysis” in Materials and Methods. How did you explained which statistical tests were used in this study?

8) I think Discussion needs to be strengthened, mostly regarding the comparison of your findings with previous findings.

9) How are the practical implications of your study. I think this study could have important practical implications. Please note them in the Discussion.

Good luck

Author Response

The responses to the Reviewer 2's comments are insered in the Report attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Thanks for the opportunity to review this interesting article. My recommendations are included in the attached document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The responses to the Reviewer 3's comments are insered in the Report attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for your revision. 

Back to TopTop