Research on Impact of IoT on Warehouse Management
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods and Methodology
2.1. Analysis of Scientific Literature on the Impact of IoT on Warehouse Management
- Positive aspects of IoT integration in warehouse management. It is believed that IoT in warehousing brings a number of benefits to companies. The adoption of IoT enables smart warehousing, brings revolutionary changes, and that is why big industries such as Alibaba, DHL, Amazon, or Bluedart have already implemented it in their inventory, logistics, and warehouse management. The paper [7] addressed some reflections relating to crucial aspects of logistics 4.0. The article supports the implementation of an intelligent system and database to share information through the IoT platform to achieve a modern automated system. This interconnected mesh system will interconnect all warehouse operations and the workforce. It will make warehouses proficient and more transparent. The thesis presented by [38] is a remarkable work that reveals an advanced system based on IoT for tracking and inventory. The author argues that the proposed system is able to track the location of all commodities and provide location-based information. This system can analyse the conditions of goods and real-time shipment shifting. Moreover, this IoT-based WMS has the capability to inspect stock, eliminate error rate at a workplace, and ensure real-time inventory. It makes warehouse management costs efficient, timely, and proficient in all operations. The article by [19] argues that ICT has become a new smart trend that brings a revolution into warehouse management. The author recommends an indoor positioning system using Bluetooth for monitoring orders. The author developed a system that uses: (1) Bluetooth tags to transfer the related product information; (2) A receiver that tracks the location of a moving object and location of pallets; and (3) The integrated software package and database sever that monitors the warehouse and exchanges data. The developed system can make the stock time, delivery time, tracking, and material management much more efficient. Implemented in a warehouse, it brings benefits. A case study-based article to analyse business performance [23] claimed that the IoT-based warehouse management system helps to maintain customer satisfaction, make product delivery efficient, ensure accurate visible inventory, and maintain a productive labour force. It was observed to make a positive impact on various warehouse operations by reducing operational costs. The research proposal by [49] indicates the blending of lean production and RFID technology to improve the efficiency of warehouse management. In this research, 10 million parts belonging to 10,000 different distribution centres were included. It was noticed that for joint ordering in warehouse delivery operation, 80–99% of time was saved having implemented RFID smart tags, and the total operation time can be further boosted by up to 91% with cross-docking.
- Negative aspects of IoT integration in warehouse management. Previous discussions revealed that IoT-enabled warehouses are more efficient, faster, and accurately operated. However, this technology also has some downsides. According to previous research, this advanced technology has drawbacks listed in Table 3.
2.2. Methodology and Research Design
- Observation: This phase involves observing premises and studying existing literature reviews to gain knowledge about what has been done in the particular field, also analysing if the existing literature is not limited in scope or if it can be replicated, and if it can be used to support the research or be used to create a questionnaire for current research.
- Induction: The inductive framework is used to support a general conclusion from the data gained through observation. This phase helps to raise a hypothesis or objective of the research.
- Deduction: This phase helps the research to draw a conclusion from the assumptions made and to develop a research model. It highlights the metrics, variables, or logic to reach an unbiased outcome, developing a research model consisting of data collection and ways to collect that data.
- Testing: This phase includes tests and supports the hypothesis. The data needs to be analysed and validated using the appropriate analysis method. Depending on the research type, the analysis can be either qualitative or quantitative.
- Evaluation: In this phase, the data collected in the research is presented, supporting conclusions, identifying limitations, and making recommendations for further research on the same topics, and replicating final results. Both qualitative and quantitative research approaches can be used in empirical research to collect data [59]. There are several methods to collect data in qualitative or quantitative research, such as: (1) Case study; (2) Observation method; (3) Expert interview; and (4) Focus group.
- Master’s degree in management at the least.
- Deep knowledge of IoT and its application area.
- Minimum of 5 years of experience in the field.
- A measure of the consistency of the opinions expressed in the study is selected.
- An exemplary model of contradictory opinions is developed.
- Calculate the distribution of the selected model measure.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Analysis of the Research Results on the Impacts of IoT on Warehouse Management
- Improved productivity, which reduces workforce and expenses.
- Power and heating monitoring in warehouses, remotely monitoring energy expenditure and time savings.
- Total asset costs can be reduced with reduced work of gadgets and maintenance.
- Optimisation over time and speeding up the management of information and material flows reduce costs over time.
- Precise control of inventory.
- Energy savings.
- Increased efficiency in every management operation.
- Accurate inventory.
- Energy savings.
- Ready-to-access data available for forecasting.
3.2. Relevance of the Model and Tools for Its Development
- Reception: This process involves the reception of commodities. To function properly, it is necessary to check if the correct quantity of goods was received at the right time. To this end, RFID tags are highly accurate and reduce human errors. They document the arrival of goods. RFID integrated with an automated scanner can capture the weight and dimensions of a package, indicating a proper location for its storage. This improves the functioning of the reception process, allows to unload the dock quickly, and to clear the space for other shipments.
- Put-away. This is the process of the movement of goods from the reception dock to the most optimal storage location. Mobile and wearable devices take the inbound goods to the right location to incorporate inventory coherently. IoT enables smart forklifts that can reduce accidents during this process, thus reducing the time needed to complete tasks and optimising storage.
- Storage: Storage in a warehouse means putting commodities in the most appropriate location. Warehouse space is capital intensive, and space optimisation can reduce this cost. IoT enables HCL warehouse space optimisation solutions, offering real-time location-specific optimisation and reducing the space turnaround ratio. RFID tags also store the location-related data of the product.
- Assembly and shipping. This involves processing customer orders and shipping. This process requires high efficiency, as errors reduce customer satisfaction. Wireless wearable devices can make such a process optimal, allowing for real-time scanning within the entire warehouse. Smart forklifts with sensors and scanners transmit data related to precautions to handle products along with outbound and inbound deliveries. GPS enables the trailer tracker system to indicate the real-time location of the shipment. The PoD solution can be used for real-time delivery reports.
- Step 1: A company should constantly monitor customers’ expectations. The results of this research show positive impact of IoT on customer satisfaction. In step 1, such a technology could be used for monitoring, risk mitigation, e-commerce website, and mobile application for the sale of products. Companies should use IoT for an extensive analysis of customer needs to initiate new products and services.
- Step 2: Once the potential benefits have been identified, the company firm should integrate the IoT platform in the existing warehouse activities; for example, integration of IoT with the warehouse management system, enterprise resource planning (ERP), SAP, PoD, and light robotics.
- Step 3: This step of adoption involves high-tech integration and the idea of a fully automated warehouse. Such a warehouse works with automated forklifts, drones, artificially intelligent, robots, and autonomous vehicles. There are well-functioning human-free advanced warehouses in China and the USA.
3.3. Results of the Expert Survey
- Time necessary to go digitalised.
- Maturity of technology.
- Compatibility of the system.
- This model contributes to the analysis of the benefits and costs of IoT. Finding solutions to fund these costs would encourage companies to implement IoT.
- The proposed model describes the functioning of a warehouse, indicating how and where IoT technology could be implemented and identifying the impacts of IoT implementation on warehouse activities.
- This research also contributes to the levels of IoT adoption to tackle the installation costs. For example, a company could start with basic automation and having identified the potential impacts, it could move to the second and third steps.
- The presented model also describes the possible solutions for data privacy. For instance, a company could hire third-party IoT system security providers in the first step of adoption.
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ackerman, K.B. Warehousing: Origins, History and Development. In Practical Handbook of Warehousing; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staudt, F.H.; Alpan, G.; Di Mascolo, M.; Rodriguez, C.M.T. Warehouse performance measurement: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2015, 53, 5524–5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartevyan, L. DLG Expert Report 7-2016. Industry 4.0—Summary Report. 2016. Available online: https://www.dlg.org/en/food/topics/dlg-expert-reports/food-technology/dlg-expert-report-7-2016 (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Jin, Y.L.; Gong, A.L.; Liu, S.P. Study of logistics warehouse management system based on RFID. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 748, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdy, W.; Mostafa, N.; Elawady, H. Towards a smart warehouse management system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Washington, DC, USA, 27–29 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, C.P.; Huang, T.C.K.; Wang, S.T. The impact of Internet of things implementation on firm performance. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 2038–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreto, L.; Amaral, A.; Pereira, T. Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: An overview. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalipi, E. Unit 4: Warehousing Procedures; Faculty of Management Sciences, Namibia University of Science and Technology: Windhoek, Namibia, 2018; pp. 1–54. [Google Scholar]
- Krauth, E.; Moonen, H.; Popova, V.; Schut, M.C. Key Performance Indicators in Logistics Service Provision—A Literature Review and Framework. In Proceedings of the European Operations Management Association International Conference on Operations and Global Competitiveness; European Operations Management Association: Brussels, Belgium, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Rouwenhorst, B.; Reuter, B.; Stockrahm, V.; Van Houtum, G.J.; Mantel, R.J.; Zijm, W.H.M. Warehouse design and control: Framework and literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2000, 122, 515–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzoni, P.; Calafate, C.T.; Cano, J.-C.; Hernandez-Orallo, E. Indoor vehicles geolocalization using LoRaWAN. Future Internet 2019, 11, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Di Renzone, G.; Fort, A.; Mugnaini, M.; Parrino, S.; Peruzzi, G.; Pozzebon, A. Interoperability among sub-GHz technologies for metallic assets tracking and monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT, Roma, Italy, 3–5 June 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangal, S.; Rajawat, K. Performance evaluation of LoRaWAN with decreasing RSSI values. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2019, 14, 177–182. [Google Scholar]
- Cameron, C.; Naeem, W.; Li, K. Functional Qos metric for lorawan ap- plications in challenging industrial environment. In Proceedings of the 2020 16th IEEE International Conference on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), Porto, Portugal, 27–29 April 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krajčovič, M.; Bučková, M.; Grznár, P. Integrated logistics. Conference: InvEnt 2017At. Research Gate. Szczyrk, Poland. June 2017. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318039648_Integrated_Logistics (accessed on 12 October 2022).
- Zubaydi, H.D.; Varga, P.; Molnár, S. Leveraging Blockchain Technology for Ensuring Security and Privacy Aspects in Internet of Things: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maane, J.S. Impact of internet of things on warehouse management. Master Thesis, Vilnius Tech, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, K.; Kyoung Kwon, O. Integrated logistics information system in Korea. Logist. Inf. Manag. 1997, 10, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, G.H.; Kwon, O.H.; Oh, A.S. Design of warehouse management system using IPS under bluetooth environment. Int. J. Multimed. Ubiquitous Eng. 2016, 11, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Žunić, E.; Delalić, S.; Hodžić, K.; Beširević, A.; Hindija, H. Smart Warehouse Management System Concept with Implementation. In Proceedings of the 2018 14th Symposium on Neural Networks and Applications (NEUREL), Belgrade, Serbia, 20–21 November 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Z.Q.; Zhu, H.J.; Du, W.H. Design and Implementation of Automated Warehouse Monitoring System Based on the Internet of Things. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 543–547, 1099–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Government, A. Internet of Things: Status and implications of an increasingly connected world. In Report to Congressional Requesters, United States Government Accountability Office, Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering; GAO: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; pp. 1–75. Available online: https://www.gao.gov/assets/files.gao.gov/assets/gao-17-75.pdf (accessed on 24 October 2022).
- Au, Y.H.N. Warehouse management system and business performance: Case study of a regional distribution centre. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing and Informatics 2009 (ICOCI09), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 24–25 June 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, I.; Lee, K. The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Bus. Horiz. 2015, 58, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Xu, H.; Liu, D.; Hu, B.; Wang, H. A vision of IoT: Applications, challenges, and opportunities with China Perspective. IEEE Internet Things J. 2014, 1, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radivojevic, G.; Milosavljevic, L. the Concept of Logistics 4.0. In Proceedings of the 4Th Logistics International Conference, Belgrade, Serbia, 23–25 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, K. Logistics 4.0 Solution.New Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation, Manchester, UK, 10–11 November 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hofmann, E.; Rüsch, M. Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput. Ind. 2017, 89, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y. Application of Information System in Warehouse Management. In Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering, Wuhan, China, 8–9 July 2017; Information Science and Internet Technology: Qingdao, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Castaldi, C. IoT In The Warehouse. 20 July 2016. Available online: https://www.manufacturing.net/industry40/article/13225538/iot-in-the-warehouse (accessed on 25 October 2022).
- Takyar, A. How AI and IoT Can Transform the Logistics and Transportation Management Ecosystem? 2018. Available online: https://www.leewayhertz.com/develop-logistics-management-software/ (accessed on 25 October 2022).
- Satti, S. Use Cases of IoT in Logistics and Delivery Management. 2020. Available online: https://mobinspire.com/use-cases-of-iot-in-logistics-and-delivery-management/ (accessed on 23 October 2022).
- Gogol, B.Y. Adoption of IOT for Warehouse Management. 2014; pp. 34–39. [Google Scholar]
- Lou, P.; Liu, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, H. Agile Supply Chain Management over the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science, Wuhan, China, 12–14 August 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, X.; Feng, Q.; Fan, T.; Lei, Q. RFID technology and its applications in Internet of Things (IoT). In Proceedings of the 2012 2nd International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks, Yichang, China, 21–23 April 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafa, N.; Hamdy, W.; Alawady, H. Impacts of internet of things on supply chains: A framework for warehousing. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, C.K.M.; Lv, Y.; Ng, K.K.H.; Choy, K.L. Design and application of Internet of Things based Warehouse Management System for Smart Logistics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2753–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.Y.; Park, D.J. Internet of things based approach for warehouse management system. Int. J. Multimed. Ubiquitous Eng. 2016, 11, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geest, M.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Catal, C. Design of a reference architecture for developing smart warehouses in industry 4.0. Comput. Ind. 2021, 124, 103343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bieringer, A.; Muller, L. Integration of Internet of Things Technologies Warehouses. Master Thesis, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Bharadwaj, A.S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Q. 2000, 24, 169–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Daya, M.; Hassini, E.; Bahroun, Z. Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 4719–4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, Y.; Li, G. Descriptive models for Internet of things. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing, ICICIP 2010, PART 2, Dalian, China, 13–15 August 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Dehning, B.; Richardson, V.J.; Zmud, R.W. The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms. J. Oper. Manag. 2007, 25, 806–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kothari, S.S.; Jain, S.V.; Venkteshwar, P.A. The Impact of IOT in Supply Chain Management. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 5, 257–259. [Google Scholar]
- Yener, F.; Yazgan, H.R. Optimal warehouse design: Literature review and case study application. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 129, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koster, R.; Le-Duc, T.; Roodbergen, K.J. Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 182, 481–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trab, S.; Bajic, E.; Zouinkhi, A.; Abdelkrim, M.N.; Chekir, H.; Ltaief, R.H. Product Allocation Planning with Safety Compatibility Constraints in IoT-based Warehouse. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 73, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, J.C.; Cheng, C.H.; Huang, P.B.; Wang, K.J.; Huang, C.J.; Ting, T.C. Warehouse management with lean and RFID application: A case study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 69, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foote, K. A Brief History of the Internet of Things. 14 January 2016. Retrieved from Dataversity. Available online: https://www.dataversity.net/brief-history-internet-things/ (accessed on 24 October 2022).
- Machado, H.; Shah, K. Internet of Things (IoT ) impacts on Supply Chain. APICS Houst. Stud. Chapter 2014, 77007, 2493–2498. [Google Scholar]
- Fenger, C. The IoT and Its Effect on Society, 2015, 20185. Available online: https://connectedworld.com/the-iot-and-its-effect-on-society/ (accessed on 24 October 2022).
- Bhagat, V. What Are Pros and Cons of Internet of Things? 2019. Available online: https://www.pixelcrayons.com/blog/what-are-pros-and-cons-of-internet-of-things/#:~:text=5,What%20are%20the%20pros%20and%20cons%20of%20IoT%3F,lesser%20employment%2C%20and%20technology%20addiction (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- Karunarathna, N.; Wickramarachchi, R.; Vidanagamachchi, K. A study of the implications of logistics 4.0 in future warehousing: A Sri Lankan perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Bangkok, Thailand, 5–7 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Pospelova, V.; López-Baldominos, I.; Fernández-Sanz, I.; Castillo-Martínez, A.; Misra, S. User and Professional Aspects for Sustainable Computing Based on the Internet of Things in Europe. Sensors 2023, 23, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayashi, V.T.; Ruggiero, W.V.; Estrella, J.C.; Filho, A.Q.; Pita, M.A.; Arakaki, R.; Ribeiro, C.; Trazzi, B.; Bulla, R., Jr. A TDFramework for Automated Monitoring in Internet of Things with Machine Learning. Sensors 2022, 22, 9498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, L.T. Empirical Research is the Process of Testing a Hypothesis Using Experimentation, Direct or Indirect Observation and Experience. 21 September 2009. Available online: https://explorable.com/empirical-research#:~:text=The%20standards%20of%20empiricism%20exist%20to%20reduce%20any,focus%20only%20on%20what%20can%20be%20empirically%20supported (accessed on 7 November 2022).
- Maxwell, J.A. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, 3rd ed.; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2018; p. 211. [Google Scholar]
- Burke, J.R.; Christensen, L. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, 5th ed.; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014; p. 977. [Google Scholar]
- Jamshed, S. Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2014, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seidman, I. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 37. [Google Scholar]
- Jarašūnienė, A.; Sinkevičius, G.; Čižiūnienė, K.; Čereška, A. Adaptation of the Management Model of Internationalization Processes in the Development of Railway Transport Activities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivilevičius, H. 2011. Application of expert evaluation method to determinate the importance of operating asphalt mixing plant quality criteria and rank correlation. Balt. J. Road Bridge Eng. 2011, 6, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maskeliūnaitė, L.; Sivilevičius, H. Identifying the importance of criteria for passenger choice of sustainable travel by train using ARTIW and IHAMCI methods. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajewska, T.; Grigoroudis, E. Importance of logistics services attributes influencing customer satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 2015 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), Valenciennes, France, 20–22 May 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
IoT Technologies | |||
---|---|---|---|
Inbound Applications | Outbound Applications | ||
Identification technologies | RFID WSN QR code Barcode EDI Sensor GPS | Placement Cycle count Location of goods Receipt management Physical count Storage optimisation Workforce optimisation Cycle count Temperature, humidity control Material flow control Real-time inventory Sales and demand forecasting | Order acceptance from host systems Packing list Dispatch Prioritisation of orders. Transportation End-user services |
Communication technologies | Zigbee Z wave MQTT Bluetooth Wi-Fi NFC WSN Middleware Cloud computing | Real-time information exchange Integration with warehouse management system packages. | – |
Problem Researched/Solved | Method Used | Findings | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Integration of IoT in warehouse management. | Qualitative | This thesis filled the existing literature gap for the reception and shipping process at a warehouse. | [40] |
Modelling a smart warehouse. | Domain analysis | Illustrated and validated the method and the proposed reference architecture. | [39] |
A resource-based perspective on information technology capabilities and corporate performance. | Regression | A company with integrated IT tends to outperform on costs and profit-based performance measures. | [41] |
Warehouse performance measure. | Content analyses | This article contributes to research development by proposing numerous future research directions on warehouse performance and evaluations. | [2] |
Important aspects of IoT in supply chain management. | Bibliometric | Latest developments and trends in the use of IoT in various supply chain operations, highlighting several possible directions for future research. | [42] |
Feature, semantic meaning, and descriptive model of IoT. | Descriptive | Two descriptive models about IoT were introduced. | [43] |
Examining the change in manufacturing firms’ financial performance before and after adopting IoT in supply chain management. | General linear model | The adoption of IoT systems increased gross margin, inventory turnover, market share, return on sales, and reduced selling, general, and administrative expenses. | [44] |
Impact of IoT on inventory and logistics management. | Explanatory | IoT is an emerging solution and brings efficient management of and real-inventory count. | [45] |
Investigation and interpretation of business performance from multiple perspectives after the implementation of a modern warehouse management system. | Descriptive | Air shipping time decreased by 54%, inventory accuracy improved from 98% to 99.52%, and 11% less customer complaints. | [23] |
Analysis of the performance of IoT implementation from the perspective of financial performance, productivity, and market value. | Ordinary least square regression | IoT implementation has a positive impact on financial performance, market value, profitability, and labour productivity of companies. | [6] |
Classification of warehouse design and control problems at a strategic, tactical, and operational level. | Event research | The synthesis of models and techniques for warehouse design and development was pursued. Recommendations concerning the design-oriented approach were presented. | [10] |
Researched effectiveness of designing warehouses to determine the average order processing time and the distance travelled using a data mining technique. | Simulation method | The proposed design with added tunnels in the warehouse improved order processing efficiency by 50%. | [46] |
Review of literature on typical decision problems in design and control of manual order processing. | Analytical | Fewer research was conducted on the picker-to-part systems compared to part-to-picker systems. The number of publications on picking bays, batching, storage strategies, and sorting are minimal. | [47] |
The issue of storing hazardous products in warehouses using IoT. | Event research | Product allocation planning with compatibility constraints (PAP/CC) was recommended, and it shows the improvement to unplanned product movement due to human error and reduces the size of floating location in a Tunisian chemical firm. | [48] |
Delivery Function | IoT Impacts | IoT Technology USED | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
All operations in WMS | CCTV footage steals customer and workforce privacy, security vulnerabilities, complexity of interconnection of thousands of devices, electronic waste. | Sensors, cameras, Wi-Fi, GPS, cloud-based network. | [22,50,51,52,53] |
All operations in WMS | Network/system, personal data-stealing, hacking, or threads. | Sensors, cameras, Wi-Fi, GPS. | [7,22,50,52] |
Online transactions | Third-party access threads, unauthentic transactions, high maintenance costs, unemployment, electronic hazard waste, environmental impacts. | Online transaction Software packages, cyber-physical system. | [7,22,53] |
Formula | Name of Calculation |
---|---|
Sum of ratings | |
Mean of ratings | |
Difference between the sum of ratings and the fixed value | |
Square of the difference |
Formula | Name of Calculation |
---|---|
The concordance coefficient | |
A random size | |
The lowest value of the concordance coefficient |
Formula | Name of Calculation |
---|---|
The ratio of the average rank to the total sum of ranks | |
Reverse size | |
Significance indicator | |
Criterion importance indicator |
Elements of Expert Evaluation | Criterion Encryption Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sum of ratings | Internal elements | Productivity | Morale and ease of work | Inventory | Order lead time | Operational productivity | Operational efficiency |
9 | 19 | 13 | 22 | 11 | 10 | ||
External elements | Sale | Customer satisfaction | Competition | - | - | - | |
10 | 6 | 8 | - | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse functions) | Receiving | Put away | Storage | Packing and shipping | - | - | |
7 | 11 | 9 | 10 | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse processes) | Forecasting | Inventory | Risk migitation | Monitoring | - | - | |
12 | 6 | 8 | 14 | - | - |
Elements of Expert Evaluation | Criterion Encryption Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean of ratings | Internal elements | Productivity | Morale and ease of work | Inventory | Order lead time | Operational productivity | Operational efficiency |
2.25 | 4.75 | 3.250 | 5.500 | 2.75 | 2.500 | ||
External elements | Sale | Customer satisfaction | Competition | - | - | - | |
2.5 | 1.5 | 2.000 | - | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse functions) | Receiving | Put away | Storage | Packing and shipping | - | - | |
1.75 | 2.75 | 2.250 | 2.500 | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse processes) | Forecasting | Inventory | Risk migitation | Monitoring | - | - | |
3 | 1.5 | 2.000 | 3.500 | - | - |
Elements of Expert Evaluation | Criterion Encryption Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Difference between the sum of ratings and the fixed value | Internal elements | Productivity | Morale and ease of work | Inventory | Order lead time | Operational productivity | Operational efficiency |
−5 | 5 | −1 | 8 | −3 | −4 | ||
External elements | Sale | Customer satisfaction | Competition | - | - | - | |
2 | −2 | 0 | - | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse functions) | Receiving | Put away | Storage | Packing and shipping | - | - | |
−3 | 1 | −1 | 0 | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse processes) | Forecasting | Inventory | Risk migitation | Monitoring | - | - | |
2 | −4 | −2 | 4 | - | - |
Elements of Expert Evaluation | Criterion Encryption Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Square of the difference | Internal elements | Productivity | Morale and ease of work | Inventory | Order lead time | Operational productivity | Operational efficiency |
25 | 25 | 1 | 64 | 9 | 16 | ||
External elements | Sale | Customer satisfaction | Competition | - | - | - | |
4 | 4 | 0 | - | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse functions) | Receiving | Put away | Storage | Packing and shipping | - | - | |
9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse processes) | Forecasting | Inventory | Risk migitation | Monitoring | - | - | |
4 | 16 | 4 | 16 | - | - |
Concordance Coefficient Values | Internal Elements | External Elements | Adopting Activities (Warehouse Functions) | Adopting Activities (Warehouse Processes) |
---|---|---|---|---|
The concordance coefficient (W) | 0.5000 | 0.2500 | 0.1375 | 0.5000 |
A random size (χ2) | 10.0000 | 2.0000 | 1.6500 | 6.0000 |
The lowest value of the concordance coefficient (Wmin) | 0.0805 | 0.0263 | 0.0487 | 0.0487 |
Elements of Expert Evaluation | Criterion Encryption Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The ratio of the average rank to the total sum of ranks | Internal elements | Productivity | Morale and ease of work | Inventory | Order lead time | Operational productivity | Operational efficiency |
0.1071 | 0.2262 | 0.1548 | 0.2619 | 0.1310 | 0.1190 | ||
External elements | Sale | Customer satisfaction | Competition | - | - | - | |
0.4167 | 0.2500 | 0.3333 | - | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse functions) | Receiving | Put away | Storage | Packing and shipping | - | - | |
0.1892 | 0.2973 | 0.2432 | 0.2703 | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse processes) | Forecasting | Inventory | Risk migitation | Monitoring | - | - | |
0.3000 | 0.1500 | 0.2000 | 0.3500 | - | - |
Elements of Expert Evaluation | Criterion Encryption Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reverse size | Internal elements | Productivity | Morale and ease of work | Inventory | Order lead time | Operational productivity | Operational efficiency |
0.8929 | 0.7738 | 0.8452 | 0.7381 | 0.8690 | 0.8810 | ||
External elements | Sale | Customer satisfaction | Competition | - | - | - | |
0.5833 | 0.7500 | 0.6667 | - | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse functions) | Receiving | Put away | Storage | Packing and shipping | - | - | |
0.8108 | 0.7027 | 0.7568 | 0.7297 | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse processes) | Forecasting | Inventory | Risk migitation | Monitoring | - | - | |
0.7000 | 0.8500 | 0.8000 | 0.6500 | - | - |
Elements of Expert Evaluation | Criterion Encryption Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significance indicator | Internal elements | Productivity | Morale and ease of work | Inventory | Order lead time | Operational productivity | Operational efficiency |
0.1786 | 0.1548 | 0.1690 | 0.1476 | 0.1738 | 0.1762 | ||
External elements | Sale | Customer satisfaction | Competition | - | - | - | |
0.2917 | 0.3750 | 0.3333 | - | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse functions) | Receiving | Put away | Storage | Packing and shipping | - | - | |
0.2703 | 0.2342 | 0.2523 | 0.2432 | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse processes) | Forecasting | Inventory | Risk migitation | Monitoring | - | - | |
0.2333 | 0.2833 | 0.2667 | 0.2167 | - | - |
Elements Of Expert Evaluation | Criterion Encryption Model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criterion importance indicator | Internal elements | Productivity | Morale and ease of work | Inventory | Order lead time | Operational productivity | Operational efficiency |
0.2262 | 0.1071 | 0.1786 | 0.0714 | 0.2024 | 0.2143 | ||
External elements | Sale | Customer satisfaction | Competition | - | - | - | |
0.2500 | 0.4167 | 0.3333 | - | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse functions) | Receiving | Put away | Storage | Packing and shipping | - | - | |
0.3514 | 0.2432 | 0.2973 | 0.2703 | - | - | ||
Adopting activities (Warehouse processes) | Forecasting | Inventory | Risk migitation | Monitoring | - | - | |
0.2000 | 0.3500 | 0.3000 | 0.1500 | - | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jarašūnienė, A.; Čižiūnienė, K.; Čereška, A. Research on Impact of IoT on Warehouse Management. Sensors 2023, 23, 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042213
Jarašūnienė A, Čižiūnienė K, Čereška A. Research on Impact of IoT on Warehouse Management. Sensors. 2023; 23(4):2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042213
Chicago/Turabian StyleJarašūnienė, Aldona, Kristina Čižiūnienė, and Audrius Čereška. 2023. "Research on Impact of IoT on Warehouse Management" Sensors 23, no. 4: 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042213
APA StyleJarašūnienė, A., Čižiūnienė, K., & Čereška, A. (2023). Research on Impact of IoT on Warehouse Management. Sensors, 23(4), 2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042213