Next Article in Journal
Generating Edge Cases for Testing Autonomous Vehicles Using Real-World Data
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Temperature–Humidity Sensors for a Pouch-Type Battery Using 100% Printing Process
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Investigation on the Impact of Excitation Amplitude on AFM-TM Microcantilever Beam System’s Dynamic Characteristics and Implementation of an Equivalent Circuit

Sensors 2024, 24(1), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010107
by Peijie Song 1,2, Xiaojuan Li 2, Jianjun Cui 3, Kai Chen 3 and Yandong Chu 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2024, 24(1), 107; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010107
Submission received: 27 November 2023 / Revised: 18 December 2023 / Accepted: 23 December 2023 / Published: 25 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Full Title: Investigation on the Impact of Excitation Amplitude on AFM- 2 TM Microcantilever Beam System's Dynamic Characteristics 3 and Implementation of an Equivalent Circuit

 

The above manuscript study the mathematical model of AFM-TM microcantilever beam system into systems 1 and 2 based on actual working conditions. then analyze the alterations in the dynamic properties of both systems due to external excitation variations using bifurcation diagrams, phase trajectories, Lyapunov indices, and attraction domains.. The abstract need covers some results that mentioned in paper, to be better. The introduction is need to be more comprehensive and the experimental work is good discussion. Some comments could be summarized as follows:

 

1-     In the abstract should be rewritten, to refer on the induced changes of beam on microstructure, mechanical properties with some data.

2-     The Keywords should be  revised.

3-     The objectives may be need to be clearer – need to modify the objective and the novelty of the work in the last paragraph of the introduction part?

4-     Why author has chosen these parameters of the AFM-TM microcantilever beam system.? Give the practical reason for selecting these values?

5-     Results are interesting, but should to be more discussion and comparison with other works?

6-     Tables 1: maybe is better if the authors put the results of uncertainty?

7-     How to measure the sample thickness?

8-     The conclusions should to be more directed toward the application of beam in modifying the microstructure, mechanical properties.

9-     You should to update the refs, some refs are old? 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors investigated the impact of excitation amplitude on AFM-TM microcantilever beam system's dynamic characteristics. And they develop the equivalent circuit model of the AFM-TM microcantilever beam and perform related software simulations, along with practical circuit experiments. Before publcation, the authors should address following issues.

 

1.  Van der Waals => van der Waals 

 

2. In introduction, the authors should express clearly about thier own work compared with previous work for originality, what the contribution the authors do in this field, why the autors did this work.

 

3. make clear in the figure 1(b) for k1, k1, kat, Fvdm, Fcas.

 

4. Define clearly system 2 and systme 1 before arguing them. Better to add some figure of descript system 1 and system 2 for imagination.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Check some grammeric issues.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I recommend to be published.

Back to TopTop