Next Article in Journal
A Study of Improved Two-Stage Dual-Conv Coordinate Attention Model for Sound Event Detection and Localization
Previous Article in Journal
Reconstruction of the Permittivity of Ex Vivo Animal Tissues in the Frequency Range 1–20 GHz Using a Water-Based Dielectric Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Real-Time Optical Fiber Salinity Interrogator Based on Time-Domain Demodulation and TPMF Incorporated Sagnac Interferometer

by
Weihao Lin
1,2,*,
Fang Zhao
3,
Jie Hu
3,
Yuhui Liu
3,
Renan Xu
1,2,
Xingwei Chen
3 and
Liyang Shao
3,4,*
1
The Higher Educational Key Laboratory for Flexible Manufacturing Equipment Integration of Fujian Province, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen 361021, China
2
School of Mechanical Electrical and Information Engineering, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen 361021, China
3
Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
4
The Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518005, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(16), 5339; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165339
Submission received: 5 July 2024 / Revised: 10 August 2024 / Accepted: 16 August 2024 / Published: 18 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section State-of-the-Art Sensors Technologies)

Abstract

:
A novel demodulation scheme for a point-type fiber sensor is designed for salinity concentration monitoring based on a Sagnac interferometer (SI) composed of a tapered polarization-maintaining fiber (TPMF) and optical time stretching technology. The SI, constructed using a PMF with a taper region of 5.92 μm and an overall length of 30 cm, demonstrated a notable enhancement in the evanescent field, which intensifies the interaction between the light field and external salinity. This enhancement allows for a direct assessment of salinity concentration changes by analyzing the variations in the SI reflection spectra and the experimental results indicate that the sensitivity of the sensor is 0.151 nm/‰. In contrast to traditional fiber optic sensors that depend on spectral demodulation with slower response rates, this work introduces a new approach where the spectral shift is translated to the time domain, utilizing a dispersion compensation fiber (DCF) with the demodulation rate reaching up to 50 MHz. The experimental outcomes reveal that the sensor exhibits a sensitivity of −0.15 ns/‰ in the time domain. The designed sensor is anticipated to play a pivotal role in remote, real-time monitoring of ocean salinity.

1. Introduction

In the past few decades, the fiber optic sensor has gained widespread adoption across various fields, such as for temperature [1], pressure [2], electric field [3], and magnetic field [4], attributed to its low cost, convenient networking, resistance to electromagnetic interference, and strong environmental adaptability [5,6,7,8]. The traditional interferometric fiber optic sensor is the most practical and technically comprehensive fiber sensor. It typically consists of four structures: the Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) [9,10], the Michelson interferometer (MI) [11,12], the Fabry–Perot interferometer (FPI) [13,14], and the SI [15,16]. Among them, the SI boasts numerous distinct advantages in the realm of marine inspection and monitoring [17,18]. The SI, rooted in the Sagnac effect, utilizes the intricate interplay of light interference to precisely detect and quantify physical parameters like temperature and strain. The instrument has a light source whose beam is bifurcated by a beam splitter into two distinct paths. These two light beams traverse the same closed loop but in opposing directions, completing a full circuit before converging once more. Crucially, any rotational angular velocity within the plane of this loop introduces a disparity in the optical paths traversed by the beams, leading to a variation in their phase relationship [19]. This subtle phase shift, in turn, gives rise to a discernible movement of interference fringes at their point of reunion, serving as a reliable indicator of the underlying physical change [20,21]. The advantages of the SI in ocean monitoring are specifically embodied in its optical path structure, which minimizes its response to external vibrations, airflows, and other external factors, making it extraordinarily resilient to interference. In addition, the SI boasts broadband functionality, covering a wide frequency range from low to high frequencies, thereby satisfying diverse application scenarios. Lastly, the structure of the SI facilitates remote signal transmission, providing significant advantages for sensors in terms of remote monitoring and data acquisition [22]. Jin et al. devised a multi-wavelength fiber ring laser cavity incorporated with an SI and an MZI hybrid interferometer to achieve long-distance multi-point acoustic positioning function, exhibiting significant potential for application in challenging marine environments [23]. Zhang et al. utilized the forward Brillouin scattering generated by radial sound waves in a large-area optical fiber to form a Sagnac loop for dual parameter measurement of temperature and acoustic impedance [24]. Although fiber hydrophones are capable of assessing the state and fluctuations in the marine environment by capturing data like frequency, intensity, and variation patterns of oceanic sound waves, accurate reflection of the intensity and frequency of various oceanic activities requires a correlation between the sound wave levels and oceanic water quality factors, including the degree of acidification, temperature, and salinity.
Salinity is of paramount importance in marine environmental protection, where monitoring salinity enables prompt detection of salt pollution in water bodies, thereby facilitating the implementation of appropriate control measures. Moreover, variations in salinity can significantly impact the living conditions of marine aquatic organisms, underscoring the critical role of salinity monitoring in safeguarding aquatic biodiversity. Additionally, salinity monitoring in oceanographic research aids in comprehending the physical and chemical properties of seawater, thereby serving as a scientific foundation for the sustainable development of marine resources. For the marine aquaculture industry, salinity is a key factor influencing the growth of marine organisms. By closely monitoring salinity levels, breeders can refine breeding conditions, ultimately enhancing the survival and growth rates of marine organisms [25]. Meanwhile, real-time salinity monitoring is crucial for marine conservation and management. It is not only related to the maintenance of marine ecological balance but also a key data source for climate prediction and disaster warning. Through real-time monitoring, we can quickly respond to changes in salinity, protect biodiversity, and ensure the safety of economic activities. In addition, real-time salinity data also assist scientific research, promote advances in marine technology, and provide solid support for sustainable development. Therefore, strengthening real-time salinity monitoring is of great significance for protecting the ocean and addressing climate change. The necessity of real-time salinity monitoring lies in its crucial role in marine protection, ecological research, and economic activity safety. Firstly, changes in salinity directly affect the survival and ecological balance of marine organisms, and real-time monitoring can detect and respond to potential ecological crises in a timely manner. Secondly, salinity data are an important basis for climate prediction and disaster warning and are of great significance for reducing disaster losses. Finally, in economic activities such as fisheries and shipping, salinity monitoring helps to ensure production safety and improve resource utilization efficiency. Therefore, real-time salinity monitoring is a necessary means to maintain ocean health and promote sustainable development. The salinity fiber sensor excels in marine monitoring due to its exceptional accuracy, robust corrosion resistance, unparalleled sensitivity, and other inherent characteristics [26,27,28]. These features guarantee stable and reliable performance in challenging marine environments. Furthermore, its high sensitivity allows for precise measurement of even the slightest salinity variations, crucial for supporting marine environmental protection and water-quality-monitoring efforts [29,30]. Its compact design, lightweight build, and ease of installation and maintenance enhance the convenience and efficiency of long-term, continuous salinity monitoring in the ocean [31,32,33]. Consequently, the fiber optic salinity sensor stands as a formidable choice with vast potential for applications in ocean monitoring. Chen et al. introduced an innovative approach for temperature and salinity monitoring, employing an MZI crafted from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and a tapered fiber. By harnessing the exceptional thermal optical coefficient of PDMS and the extensive evanescent field of the tapered fiber, this method attained a remarkable salinity sensitivity of 1.43 nm/% and a temperature sensitivity of −2.21 nm/°C [34]. However, this method necessitates the application of an additional polymer coating, posing challenges in precisely controlling the thickness and range of the coating layer. The repeatability of this method may require further examination and validation. Wei et al. attained the optical fiber surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect through depositing a gold film onto a grounded conical optical fiber, successfully achieving salinity measurement with a remarkable sensitivity of 0.6898 nm/‰ [35]. However, the utilization of gold film poses challenges in terms of durability, hindering its application for long-term ocean monitoring. Currently, the predominant point-type fiber optic salinity monitoring solutions primarily focus on enhancing sensitivity [36,37,38,39], which is inherently constrained by the instrumentation, resulting in a relatively sluggish demodulation rate when utilizing traditional spectrometer-based experimental approaches. This poses a challenge for real-time monitoring in dynamic marine environments. Consequently, there is a pressing need for a novel demodulation method that can significantly expedite the demodulation rate for salinity monitoring. Optical fiber time-domain sensing, leveraging its advantage of rapid demodulation, has been proposed for realizing real-time monitoring [40]. This technology allows for a direct observation of the system’s output response, eliminating the need for complex mathematical transformations or inferences. This directness enables users to promptly acquire real-time status information of the system. Furthermore, time-domain sensing accurately depicts the system’s dynamic performance, encompassing stability, accuracy, and responsiveness. Through precise time-domain analysis, the accuracy and reliability of measurement results are ensured. Additionally, time-domain-sensing technology can monitor and swiftly respond to changes in measured parameters in real-time, enabling the timely detection and resolution of potential issues. This real-time capability is particularly crucial in scenarios requiring rapid response. Lastly, optical fiber time-domain-sensing technology enables continuous monitoring, facilitating the acquisition of data variations and trends over extended periods, thereby enhancing the accuracy and reliability of monitoring.
In this work, we present a fiber sensor utilizing a time-stretching demodulation technique and the SI composed of TPMF, specifically tailored for measuring salinity concentration variations. This approach involves the use of dispersion-compensating fiber (DCF) to translate the interference spectrum movements caused by alterations in salinity concentration from the spectral domain to the time domain with an impressive interrogation speed of up to 50 MHz. The TPMF with a waist width of 5.92 μm acts as a sensitization fiber, augmenting the interaction between evanescent waves and external salinity which allows for highly sensitive measurements. Experimental results reveal that the sensor achieves a salinity sensitivity of 0.151 nm/‰ in the spectral domain and 0.15 ns/‰ in the time domain. The designed sensing system stands out for its swift interrogation speed, remarkable sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness, positioning it as a potential new standard in ocean salinity monitoring for real-time seawater concentration tracking.

2. Working Principle and Experimental Setup

Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of an SI composed of a tapered PMF. The laser source passes through a 3 dB coupler and is then evenly divided into two beams. The beams propagate simultaneously in the loop, one clockwise and the other counterclockwise. Upon their return to the 3 dB coupler, the beams interfere with each other due to the difference in optical path. Additionally, the high birefringence B of PMF introduces a notable phase shift during transmission, which can be mathematically expressed as [41]:
φ P M F = 2 π B L λ
Here, L denotes the length of the PMF, while λ is the center wavelength of the laser which is set at 1560 nm.
Utilizing tapered fiber technology, the evanescent field of the fiber core is brought into full contact with the external refractive index (RI), enabling accurate salinity measurement, and the microstructure of TPMF is shown in Figure 2, with a width of 5.92 μm. At the tapered region, the input light intensity splits, with a fraction coupling to the surrounding environment and the remainder remaining within the fiber. Upon convergence of these two light fractions in the conical region, a phase difference arises due to the discrepancy between the RI of the environment and the RI of the fast and slow axes of the PMF, denoted as Δ n e f f . This phase difference can be mathematically described as [41]:
φ t P M F = 2 π l λ Δ n e f f
where l represents the effective length of the RI-sensitive structure. The phase shifts trigger optical interference, and the output is captured by both an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) and a photo detector (PD).
The transmittance of the system can be written as [39]:
T = E T x 2 + E T y 2 / E x 2 + E y 2
In this equation, E x , E y , E T x , and E T y refer to the initial and transmitted electric field components under an orthogonal polarization mode. To articulate the result of the electric field transmission, a Jones matrix is employed under the assumption of negligible loss, which is defined by [41]:
E T x E T y = θ 1 θ 2 J c w θ 2 θ 1 J c c w θ 1 E x E y
where θ 1 , θ 2 , θ 1 , and θ 2 represent the polarization rotation angles along the polarization axis at the two splicing points between the PMF and the single-mode fiber (SMF) in the SI, considering both clockwise and counterclockwise directions. J c w and J c c w denote the Jones matrices for light propagating through the TPMF in the clockwise and counterclockwise directions, respectively, which can be written as [41]:
J c w J c c w = e j φ t P M F 2 0 0 e j φ t P M F 2 e j φ P M F 2 0 0 e j φ P M F 2
Based on the aforementioned equations, it has been established that the output transmission is influenced by the RI difference between the fiber sensor and its surroundings, indicating that salinity variations can be tracked accordingly. Specifically, the RI sensitivity can be expressed as:
S R I t P M F = Δ λ Δ n = d Δ n e f f · λ d n · Δ n e f f
It is well-established that a linear mapping of wavelength to time can be attained through the utilization of DCF exhibiting linear dispersion, as illustrated in Figure 3. The correlation between wavelength shifts influenced by external RI and their corresponding time domain shifts is expressed by the following equation [40]:
Δ t = D · Δ λ
In which D is the dispersion coefficient of DCF equal −1000 ps/nm and Δt is the offset of the time-domain spectrum. The relationship between the wavelength and its corresponding time is evident from Equation (7). Due to the negative dispersion coefficient of DCF, the changes in the time domain are negatively correlated with the shifts in the interference peaks in the wavelength domain.
The experimental setup is illustrated in Figure 4. A mode-locked fiber laser (MLL) (EFLA0132, ROI, Guangdong, China) emits femtosecond pulses (44 fs) with a wavelength of 1560 nm and a repetition rate of 50 MHz, which are transmitted to the optical coupler (OC) through an isolator (ISO) and polarization controller (PC). The ISO is employed to safeguard the light source from the harm caused by backscattered light, whereas the PC is utilized to regulate the polarization state of light to guarantee the output light intensity. The pulse light is transmitted via the OC to the 3 dB coupler, where it is simultaneously directed both forward and backward towards the TPMF and it interacts with varying salinity concentrations. Upon recoupling at the coupler, this interference is then transmitted through the OC to the DCF, successfully mapping the spectral domain interference to the time domain. The pulse signal carrying interference information is broadened by DCF and transmitted to the OSA (AQ6370D, YOKOGAWA, Japan) and oscilloscope through a 3 dB coupler for both wavelength- and time-domain demodulation.

3. Experimental Results

Figure 5 depicts the reflection spectrum of the SI that comprises the TPMF, fabricated using a tapered machine (AFBT-8000LE-H0, Kepler, Shandong, China). The TPMF, heated via hydrogen ignition, has a total length of 25 mm and a waist width of 5.92 μm. The total length of PMF is 30 cm. The specific process for fabricating a tapered optical fiber is as follows: first, the protective coating of the PMF is stripped off, it is cleaned with alcohol, and then it is placed on the tapering machine. Secondly, the vacuum pump is turned on to create a vacuum and use magnets to thoroughly adsorb the optical fiber onto the machine. Thirdly, the operation interface is initialized, the hydrogen ignition device is turned on, and the heating nozzle is ignited to preheat the optical fiber. Fourthly, the upper computer is controlled to start stretching the optical fiber, and the stretching length is fixed at 25 mm to obtain the required tapered optical fiber. Additionally, Figure 5 highlights the superior interference effect, achieving a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) exceeding 20 dB across the spectrum.
Figure 6 exhibits the time waveform resulting from the mapping of wavelength data from the spectral domain to the time domain. The results indicate notable interference effects in the time domain with some interference information absent. The situation likely stems from the limited dispersion coefficient of the DCF, which fails to fully capture the spectral information. To address this, substitution of the DCF with a higher-dispersion-coefficient fiber is able to solve the problem. Despite this limitation, the interference spectrum in the time domain remains sensitive to salinity variations, as evidenced by subsequent experimental findings.
Figure 7 depicts the variation in the interference spectrum shift as the salinity concentration escalates from 0‰ to 25‰, exhibiting a redshift towards longer wavelengths at a 5‰ incremental increase in concentration. This alignment concurs with the theoretical underpinnings outlined in Equation (7).
Figure 8 presents a schematic visualization of the linear fitting equation in the spectral domain. The designed salinity sensor exhibits superior sensitivity, achieving a sensitivity of 0.151 nm/‰. The coefficient of determination, reaching 0.99512, demonstrates the sensor’s outstanding linear response and robust ability to demodulate wavelength shifts resulting from salinity changes within the range of 0‰ to 25‰. This significant accomplishment lays the foundation for ultra-fast demodulation techniques based on the time domain.
Figure 9 illustrates the interference waveform in the time domain, revealing that as salinity concentration rises, the waveform undergoes a blue shift towards shorter wavelengths, contrary to the trend observed in Figure 7. This phenomenon arises due to the negative dispersion coefficient of DCF, aligning with the theoretical predictions outlined in Equation (7).
Figure 10 presents the outcome of the linear fitting equation applied to the time waveform, exhibiting a noteworthy sensitivity of −0.15 ns/‰ in the time domain, indicating its superior performance. The coefficient of determination stands at an impressive 0.99928, reflecting an almost perfect linear relationship. This remarkable linearity is highly beneficial for the sensor, facilitating intuitive assessments of salinity concentration. Figure 11 shows the stability test results of the sensor, and the experimental results show that when the salinity concentration is 0‰, the fluctuation in the time domain is less than one thousandth of a microsecond. Furthermore, leveraging the ultra-high repetition rate of the femtosecond pulse, this system achieves an interrogation demodulation speed of 50 MHz, surpassing an ordinary OSA by hundreds of times in speed. The experiment is repeated five times and the maximum error in time domain is calculated to be 0.00015, and the maximum error in wavelength domain is calculated to be 0.13.

4. Discussion

The upper limit of the demodulation rate of traditional point-type optical fiber sensors is 20 KHz, while the salinity sensor we designed has achieved ultra-fast demodulation with a rate up to 50 MHz based on the time-stretch method which is a thousand-fold increase. In addition, compared to our previous work [41], the SI-based salinity sensor enables ultra-long-distance monitoring through the cascade of couplers and circulators, whereas the MZI structure has significant limitations in sensing distance, restricting its application scenarios primarily to laboratory environments. Consequently, the SI structure is more practical for real-time ocean salinity monitoring. Nonetheless, in the realm of fiber optic ocean salinity monitoring, three principal challenges persist: firstly, the tapered region of the fiber is particularly vulnerable, prone to damage in the intricate marine environment. Secondly, the oscilloscope’s data collection capacity is limited, often resulting in data saturation during prolonged data gathering. Lastly, fiber optic interferometers exhibit cross-sensitivity, posing a risk of significant measurement inaccuracies. The aforementioned challenges are not intractable. To address the fragility of fiber, the sensor can be enhanced by encapsulating it with polymers and metal materials [42,43]. To overcome the limitation of data access, data acquisition cards can be employed for remote, real-time data collection [44,45]. Furthermore, neural network algorithms can be utilized to train and analyze wavelength shifts and intensity changes induced by multiple parameters, thereby mitigating cross-sensitivity issues [46,47]. Meanwhile, the designed sensor inevitably exhibits cross-sensitivity, a phenomenon also observed in point-type optical fiber sensors. In practical applications, temperature alters the length and refractive index of optical fibers through thermal expansion and contraction, contaminants change the refractive index and absorption characteristics of the fibers, and water flow may modify the fixed state of the fibers, optical path length, and light scattering, all of which lead to changes in light wave phase and subsequently affect the stability and accuracy of interference signals. To tackle these issues, measures such as temperature compensation technology, temperature control, anti-fouling coatings, encapsulation protection, regular cleaning, fixed design, flow field control, and protective shields can be employed. These measures effectively mitigate the impacts of temperature, contaminants, and water flow on the fiber optic interferometric salinity sensor, thereby enhancing its stability and accuracy.
The selection of demodulation techniques for fiber optic interferometric sensors involves a trade-off between spectral demodulation and time-stretch demodulation in the time domain. Spectral demodulation stands out due to its high resolution and ability to capture comprehensive spectral information, making it crucial for applications requiring precise spectral measurements. However, this technology often comes with high costs, relatively slow scanning speeds, and large equipment sizes, limiting its applicability in cost-sensitive or highly portable scenarios. In contrast, time-stretch demodulation in the time domain has garnered significant attention for its low cost, high-speed response, and ease of integration. It is particularly suitable for applications demanding real-time performance, miniaturization, and portability. Nevertheless, it is important to note that despite its numerous advantages, time-stretch demodulation may have limitations in demodulation accuracy and technical complexity, which may render it unsuitable for all types of fiber optic interferometric sensors, thus limiting its application range.
Table 1 compares the sensitivity of our sensor with that of previously reported sensors. As can be seen from the table, our sensor has a sensitivity that is comparable to other optical fiber sensors, while also being able to achieve ultra-fast salinity monitoring.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a novel real-time fiber optic salinity sensor based on the time-stretching effect and the SI composed of TPMF has been theoretically demonstrated and experimentally validated. The laser pulse is simultaneously transmitted in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions through the coupler to the TPMF, which possesses a waist width of 5.92 μm. This configuration generates interference effects and effectively amplifies the reaction between the evanescent field and external salinity concentration, ultimately resulting in a salinity sensitivity of 0.151 nm/‰. DCF seamlessly transitions the interference from the spectral domain to the time domain, achieving a sensitivity of −0.15 ns/‰. Furthermore, leveraging the high repetition rate of femtosecond lasers, the demodulation rate of the system soars to 50 MHz, outperforming traditional spectral demodulation methods by hundreds of times. The designed sensor boasts advantages including a rapid demodulation rate, superior sensitivity, a streamlined structure, and cost-effectiveness, making it a promising candidate for marine environmental monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L. and Y.L.; methodology, W.L. and F.Z.; validation, W.L., J.H. and R.X.; formal analysis, Y.L.; data curation, X.C.; writing—original draft preparation, W.L. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, F.Z., J.H. and R.X.; visualization, X.C.; supervision, W.L. and L.S.; project administration, L.S.; funding acquisition, L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Department of Natural Resources of Guangdong Province, grant number GDNRC [2022] No. 22; Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, grant number 20220815121807001; Intelligent Laser Basic Research Laboratory, grant number PCL2021A14-B1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Obtained experimental data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Liu Yibin and Li Jialong for their selfless assistance and significant contributions in this experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. James, S.W.; Tatam, R.P. Optical fibre long-period grating sensors: Characteristics and application. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, R49–R61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sahota, J.K.; Gupta, N.; Dhawan, D. Fiber Bragg grating sensors for monitoring of physical parameters: A comprehensive review. Opt. Eng. 2020, 59, 060901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yibin, L.; Lin, W.; Vai, M.I.; Shum, P.P.; Shao, L.-Y.; He, W.; Liu, S.; Zhao, F.; Wang, W.; Yuhui, L. Fiber Optic Electric Field Intensity Sensor Based on Liquid Crystal-Filled Photonic Crystal Fiber Incorporated Ring Laser. IEEE Photonics J. 2022, 14, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cui, X.; Hu, X.; Cui, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q. Research on the fiber intensity modulation model of superconducting magnetic levitation rotor. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2024, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kersey, A.D.; Davis, M.A.; Patrick, H.J.; LeBlanc, M.; Koo, K.P.; Askins, C.G.; Putnam, M.A.; Friebele, E.J. Fiber grating sensors. J. Light. Technol. 1997, 15, 1442–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mihailov, S.J. Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors for Harsh Environments. Sensors 2012, 12, 1898–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sharma, A.K.; Jha, R.; Gupta, B.D. Fiber-Optic Sensors Based on Surface Plasmon Resonance: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 1118–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, W.; Huang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Lee, R.K.; Yariv, A. Highly sensitive fiber Bragg grating refractive index sensors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 151122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, L.; Yang, J.; Wang, S.; Li, B.; Wang, M. Fiber Mach–Zehnder interferometer based on microcavities for high-temperature sensing with high sensitivity. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 3753–3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tian, T.; Han, J.; Liang, K.; Li, S.; Ma, Y.; Geng, T.; Yuan, L. A temperature sensor based on multi-beam capture and interference. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2024, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, Z.; Yam, S.S.H.; Loock, H.-P. Refractive index sensor based on an abrupt taper Michelson interferometer in a single-mode fiber. Opt. Lett. 2008, 33, 1105–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ni, C.; Zhao, M.; Wang, X.; Tan, Z. Research on the application of interferometric optical fiber sensors in high-pressure gas pipelines. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2024, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, H.; Liu, J.; Wu, H.; Liang, L.; Wang, C.; Zhou, A. Highly Sensitive Fiber Temperature Sensor Based on Photopolymer Probe and Vernier-Like Effect. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 30286–30292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, C.E.; Taylor, H.F. Fiber-optic Fabry-Perot temperature sensor using a low-coherence light source. J. Light. Technol. 1991, 9, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, Y.; Li, C.; Zuo, Y.; Xia, L. Half-Wave Voltage Measurement Method Based on SI and Time-Domain Pulse Intensity Demodulation. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2024, 36, 865–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, M.; Lin, Z.; Shi, W.; Wang, R.; Qiao, X. On-Chip Demodulation Approach Based on Microring Resonator for Fiber-Optic Vernier Effect Sensing. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 17812–17816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, F.; Lin, W.; Hu, J.; Liu, S.; Yu, F.; Chen, X.; Wang, G.; Shum, P.P.; Shao, L. Salinity and Temperature Dual-Parameter Sensor Based on Fiber Ring Laser with Tapered Side-Hole Fiber Embedded in Sagnac Interferometer. Sensors 2022, 22, 8533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, Y.; Lin, W.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, X.; Shao, L.-Y. Dual-Parameter Fiber Sensors for Salinity and Temperature Measurement Based on a Tapered PMF Incorporated With an FBG in Sagnac Loop. IEEE Photonics J. 2024, 16, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, N.; Ramachandran, K. Dynamic spectral maneuvering by fiber Sagnac loop filter. Opt. Laser Technol. 2014, 63, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mortimore, D.B. Fiber loop reflectors. J. Light. Technol. 1988, 6, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Morishita, K.; Shimamoto, K. Wavelength-selective fiber loop mirrors and their wavelength tunability by twisting. J. Light. Technol. 1995, 13, 2276–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aslam Mollah, M.; Yousufali, M.; Rifat Bin Asif Faysal, M.; Rabiul Hasan, M.; Hossain, M.B.; Amiri, I.S. Highly sensitive photonic crystal fiber salinity sensor based on Sagnac interferometer. Results Phys. 2020, 16, 103022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jin, R.; Shi, F.; Li, C.; Ma, B.; He, C.; Du, Y.; Wang, C.; Jia, B. All-Fiber Remote Acoustic Source Positioning System Utilizing Multi-Wavelength EDFRL. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2024, 36, 849–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.; Guo, M.; Liu, X.; Bai, Q.; Wang, D.; Zhang, M.; Jin, B. Distributed acoustic sensor based on improved minimum control recursive average algorithm. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2019, 50, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aoun, C.G.; Mansour, N.; Dornaika, F.; Lagadec, L. Environmental Constraints for Intelligent Internet of Deep-Sea/Underwater Things Relying on Enterprise Architecture Approach. Sensors 2024, 24, 2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, S.; Wang, T.; Li, B.; Du, S.; Li, D.; Chen, B. Multi-parameter sensor based on dumbbell stepped fiber core structure with the composite interferometric effect. Opt. Commun. 2024, 554, 130182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, S.-Q.; Zhao, Y.; Peng, Y.; Zhao, J.-C. High-sensitivity optical fiber SPR sensor with cascaded biconical fiber and hetero-core structure for simultaneous measurement of seawater salinity and temperature. Opt. Laser Technol. 2024, 170, 110275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.-n. Artificial neural network-assisted optical fiber sensor for accurately measuring salinity and temperature. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2024, 366, 114958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qian, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Q.-l.; Yang, Y. Review of salinity measurement technology based on optical fiber sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 260, 86–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nguyen, L.V.; Vasiliev, M.; Alameh, K. Three-Wave Fiber Fabry–Pérot Interferometer for Simultaneous Measurement of Temperature and Water Salinity of Seawater. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2011, 23, 450–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, Y.; Bian, Q.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Liang, L. High Sensitivity All Optical Fiber Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) Sensing Based on an Optical Microfiber Coupler (OMC). J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 2739–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Amiri, I.S.; Paul, B.K.; Ahmed, K.; Aly, A.H.; Zakaria, R.; Yupapin, P.; Vigneswaran, D. Tri-core photonic crystal fiber based refractive index dual sensor for salinity and temperature detection. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2018, 61, 847–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, Z.-T.; Lv, R.-Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, H.-K. High-sensitivity salinity measurement sensor based on no-core fiber. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 305, 111947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, H.; Li, J.; Li, P.; Feng, S.; Meng, L.; Lv, M. Simultaneous measurement of temperature and salinity of seawater based on the semi-encapsulated tapered no-core fiber. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2023, 133, 104866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wei, X.; Peng, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y. Optimization of tapered optical fiber sensor based on SPR for high sensitivity salinity measurement. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2023, 78, 103309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Leal-Junior, A.; Lopes, G.; Lazaro, R.; Duque, W.; Frizera, A.; Marques, C. SPR and FBG sensors system combination for salinity monitoring: A feasibility test. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2023, 78, 103305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.; Ma, M.; Tian, F.; Zeng, Z.; Xiu, Z.; Liu, S.; Yang, X.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, C.; et al. Temperature and salinity sensing characteristics of embedded core optical fiber based on surface plasmon resonance. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Díaz-Herrera, N.; Esteban, O.; Navarrete, M.C.; Haitre, M.L.; González-Cano, A. In situsalinity measurements in seawater with a fibre-optic probe. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 2227–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Siyu, E.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Han, B.; Zheng, W.; Wu, Q.-L.; Zheng, H.-K. Two-Channel Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor for Simultaneous Measurement of Seawater Salinity and Temperature. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 69, 7191–7199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lin, W.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhao, F.; Hu, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Vai, M.I.; Shum, P.P.; Shao, L.-Y. Ultrafast Salinity Interrogation based on a Tapered Fiber Modal Interferometry and Time-Stretching Method. J. Light. Technol. 2024, 42, 5025–5032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, C.; Zhang, S.; Shi, D.; Wu, Y.; Cao, Z.; Liu, Z. Simultaneous measurement of salinity and temperature using a Sagnac interferometer based on concatenated polarization-maintaining fiber tapers. Appl. Opt. 2021, 60, 8904–8909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, J.; Yuan, L. Package and installation of embeddable fiber optic sensors. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2009, 47, 1085–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kuang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Xiong, L.; Liu, W. Packaging and Temperature Compensation of Fiber Bragg Grating for Strain Sensing: A Survey. Photonic Sens. 2018, 8, 320–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cui, K.; Peng, W.; Ren, Z.; Qian, J.; Zhu, R. FPGA-based interrogation controller with optimized pipeline architecture for very large-scale fiber-optic interferometric sensor arrays. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2019, 121, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Elaskar, J.; Luda, M.A.; Tozzetti, L.; Codnia, J.; Oton, C.J. FPGA-Based High-Speed Optical Fiber Sensor Based on Multitone-Mixing Interferometry. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Venketeswaran, A.; Lalam, N.; Wuenschell, J.; Ohodnicki, P.R.; Badar, M.; Chen, K.P.; Lu, P.; Duan, Y.; Chorpening, B.; Buric, M. Recent Advances in Machine Learning for Fiber Optic Sensor Applications. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2021, 4, 2100067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y.-n.; Yu, Q.; Ren, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, Y. Application of machine learning in optical fiber sensors. Measurement 2024, 228, 114391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Selokar, T.; Giraldi, M.T.R. All-fiber sensors for salinity and temperature simultaneous measurement. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, S.; Yin, B.; Sang, G.; Lv, Y.; Wang, M.; Xiao, S.; Yan, R.; Wu, S. Underwater Temperature and Salinity Fiber Sensor Based on Semi-Open Cavity Structure of Asymmetric MZI. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 18219–18233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, F.; Hlushko, R.; Wu, D.; Sukhishvili, S.A.; Du, H.; Tian, F. Ocean Salinity Sensing Using Long-Period Fiber Gratings Functionalized with Layer-by-Layer Hydrogels. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 2134–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the Sagnac interferometer (SI) structure composed of tapered polarization-maintaining fiber (TPMF). Red arrows: light output; Blue arrows: light input.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the Sagnac interferometer (SI) structure composed of tapered polarization-maintaining fiber (TPMF). Red arrows: light output; Blue arrows: light input.
Sensors 24 05339 g001
Figure 2. The microscopic structure diagram of TPMF.
Figure 2. The microscopic structure diagram of TPMF.
Sensors 24 05339 g002
Figure 3. The schematic diagram of time-domain sensing based on dispersion compensation fiber (MLL: mode-locked laser).
Figure 3. The schematic diagram of time-domain sensing based on dispersion compensation fiber (MLL: mode-locked laser).
Sensors 24 05339 g003
Figure 4. The experimental setup of the designed ultra-fast salinity fiber sensor.
Figure 4. The experimental setup of the designed ultra-fast salinity fiber sensor.
Sensors 24 05339 g004
Figure 5. The reflection spectrum at output port based on spectral demodulation.
Figure 5. The reflection spectrum at output port based on spectral demodulation.
Sensors 24 05339 g005
Figure 6. The temporal waveform based on time domain demodulation.
Figure 6. The temporal waveform based on time domain demodulation.
Sensors 24 05339 g006
Figure 7. The reflection spectra of the fiber sensor under different concentrations of salinity.
Figure 7. The reflection spectra of the fiber sensor under different concentrations of salinity.
Sensors 24 05339 g007
Figure 8. The linear fitting curve depicts the reflection spectrum of the salinity sensor.
Figure 8. The linear fitting curve depicts the reflection spectrum of the salinity sensor.
Sensors 24 05339 g008
Figure 9. The temporal waveform of the fiber sensor under different concentrations of salinity.
Figure 9. The temporal waveform of the fiber sensor under different concentrations of salinity.
Sensors 24 05339 g009
Figure 10. The linear fitting curve depicts the temporal waveform of the salinity sensor.
Figure 10. The linear fitting curve depicts the temporal waveform of the salinity sensor.
Sensors 24 05339 g010
Figure 11. The Stability testing of sensor in the time domain (at a concentration of 0‰).
Figure 11. The Stability testing of sensor in the time domain (at a concentration of 0‰).
Sensors 24 05339 g011
Table 1. The sensitivity comparation with different types of salinity sensor.
Table 1. The sensitivity comparation with different types of salinity sensor.
StructuresSalinity Sensitivity (nm/‰)Ref.
MZI with PDMS0.143[32]
Balloon-shaped SMF0.168[48]
Asymmetric MZI0.309[49]
LPFG0.125[50]
This work0.151/
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, W.; Zhao, F.; Hu, J.; Liu, Y.; Xu, R.; Chen, X.; Shao, L. Real-Time Optical Fiber Salinity Interrogator Based on Time-Domain Demodulation and TPMF Incorporated Sagnac Interferometer. Sensors 2024, 24, 5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165339

AMA Style

Lin W, Zhao F, Hu J, Liu Y, Xu R, Chen X, Shao L. Real-Time Optical Fiber Salinity Interrogator Based on Time-Domain Demodulation and TPMF Incorporated Sagnac Interferometer. Sensors. 2024; 24(16):5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Weihao, Fang Zhao, Jie Hu, Yuhui Liu, Renan Xu, Xingwei Chen, and Liyang Shao. 2024. "Real-Time Optical Fiber Salinity Interrogator Based on Time-Domain Demodulation and TPMF Incorporated Sagnac Interferometer" Sensors 24, no. 16: 5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop