Next Article in Journal
A Multi-Scale Liver Tumor Segmentation Method Based on Residual and Hybrid Attention Enhanced Network with Contextual Integration
Previous Article in Journal
Measurement Method of Stress in High-Voltage Cable Accessories Based on Ultrasonic Longitudinal Wave Attenuation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potentiometric Surfactant Sensor with a Pt-Doped Acid-Activated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Based Ionophore Nanocomposite
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction of Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 Novel Composite for the Sensitive and Selective Trace-Level Electrochemical Detection of Sulfamethazine in Food and Water Samples

by
Rajendran Surya
1,2,
Subramanian Sakthinathan
1,2,*,
Ganesh Abinaya Meenakshi
1,2,
Chung-Lun Yu
1,2 and
Te-Wei Chiu
1,2,*
1
Department of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, No. 1, Section 3, Chung-Hsiao East Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan
2
Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, No. 1, Section 3, Chung-Hsiao East Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(17), 5844; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175844
Submission received: 18 July 2024 / Revised: 14 August 2024 / Accepted: 1 September 2024 / Published: 9 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Applications of Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors)

Abstract

:
The most frequently used sulfonamide is sulfamethazine (SMZ) because it is often found in foods made from livestock, which is hazardous for individuals. Here, we have developed an easy, quick, selective, and sensitive analytical technique to efficiently detect SMZ. Recently, transition metal oxides have attracted many researchers for their excellent performance as a promising sensor for SMZ analysis because of their superior redox activity, electrocatalytic activity, electroactive sites, and electron transfer properties. Further, Cu-based oxides have a resilient electrical conductivity; however, to boost it to an extreme extent, a composite including two-dimensional (2D) graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanosheets needs to be constructed and ready as a composite (denoted as g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5). Moreover, several techniques, including X-ray diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscopy analysis, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy were employed to analyze the composites. The electrochemical measurements have revealed that the constructed g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composites exhibit great electrochemical activity. Nevertheless, the sensor achieved outstanding repeatability and reproducibility alongside a low limit of detection (LOD) of 0.23 µM, a long linear range of 2 to 276 µM, and an electrode sensitivity of 8.86 µA µM−1 cm−2. Finally, the proposed GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode proved highly effective for detection of SMZ in food samples, with acceptable recoveries. The GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode has been successfully applied to SMZ detection in food and water samples.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Sulfamethazine (SMZ), frequently referred to as 4-amino-n-(4, 6-dimethylpyrimidin-2-yl) benzene sulfonamide, pertains to the sulfonamide family, a widely used class of veterinary medicine, antimicrobial agents, and a preventative measure. In recent times sulfamethazine has gained quite an impressive amount of interest because of being one of the essential antibacterial medications for treating several illnesses, including urinary tract infections, chancroid, Toxoplasma gondii encephalitis, etc. [1]. However, SMZ overdose or prolonged exposure in the human body can lead to severe chronic toxicity, inflammation of the liver, and genetic disruption, which could boost death and disability rates [2]. Moreover, excess consumption of SMZ tends to stimulate carcinogenesis, tetra genesis, and mutagenesis. For this reason, it is crucial to find SMZ in consumables at trace levels [3]. For this reason, we have developed a precise method for detecting SMZ. There are enormous methods to detect SMZ compared to other analytic methods like capillary electrophoresis [4], UV spectrophotometry, and biosensors [5]. These aforementioned techniques are used to analyze SMZ on food samples. Moreover, the detection of SMZ in animal fluids and tissue detection methods include gas chromatography, chemical ionization, electron-capture or flame ionization detection, immunoassay, calorimetric, enzyme-linked immunosorbent analysis, and screening for microbial diffusion. Most of these approaches involve a time-consuming, expensive, and labor-intensive sample preparation process; nevertheless, their sensitivity and specificity are low [6,7,8]. In this regard, electrochemical approaches provide advantages such as enhanced sensitivity, user-friendliness, and fully portable instrumentation [9]. In recent times, transition metal oxides have attracted many researchers because of their excellent ability in energy conversion, energy storage, and sensing applications. In addition, copper yttrium oxide (Cu2Y2O5) components [10] are used for solid-state galvanic cells, superconducting materials, p-type semiconductor material, and photocatalytic, and antibacterial properties against E. coli in a dark environment. Moreover, the high photocatalytic activity of the Cu2Y2O5 component applied to hydrogen evolution because of good electron transfer, high surface area, thermal stability, catalytic activity, electromagnetic properties, and layered structure of the Cu2Y2O5 component. In addition, the as-prepared Cu2Y2O5 has unique size-dependent properties. Therefore, based on the aforementioned properties, we have used the Cu2Y2O5 component for the electrochemical sensor application [11,12,13,14]. However, the material shows good sensing performance but it does not exhibit prolonged ability to enhance its stability; therefore, we have to make a composite consisting of graphitic carbon nanosheets (g-C3N4). However, compared to graphene, g-C3N4 has a large active area and unique porous networks [15,16,17]. For instance, g-C3N4 actively modifies the electrical characteristics, making it a suitable material for anchoring dynamic mixed-metal oxide species that enhance electrochemical stability and selectivity [18,19,20,21,22]. Consequently, the construction of Cu2Y2O5 anchored g-C3N4, which has many electroactive sites and remarkable endurance towards the determination of SMZ, making it ideal for use in sensing applications [23].
Enhanced electron-transfer rates, higher current, and reduced overpotential are accomplished through the utilization of nanomaterials with greater surface areas. This leads to enhanced electrodes that are more resilient, selective, sensitive and have higher electrocatalytic activities [24]. Herein, we have established a new strategy for the unique design of Cu2Y2O5 particles anchored with g-C3N4 nanosheets for non-enzymatic SMZ sensors. To obtain better sensing capabilities, the highly conductive g-C3N4 nanosheets will quicken the movement of electrons to the Cu2Y2O5. In particular, the g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite displays good interaction between Cu2Y2O5 and g-C3N4, improving the kinetics of electron transport and the active sites. The elevated electron movement occurs due to a low resistivity and the proposed electrocatalysts’ wide surface area. The aromatic amine group (-NH2) electro-oxidation occurs irreversibly in SMZ, reducing the overpotential +0.85 V in comparison with the bare electrode and forming a hydroxylamine group (-NHOH) via the movement of 2H+ and 2e ions in the g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 modified electrode area. The ideal g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite has more incredible sensing towards SMZ, featuring outstanding reproducibility, ultralong stability, limit of detection (LOD) of nanomolar (nM) levels, linear detection range, great selectivity, and sensitivity. Compared to the most efficient nonenzymatic sulfamethazine sensors mentioned in the literature, our recently created sensors perform better in terms of sensing. Moreover, effectiveness has been demonstrated by an adequate recovery rate for SMZ detection in real samples with impressive electrochemical sensing characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical and Reagents

Materials and methods should be described with sufficient details to allow others to replicate, and build on the results. The required chemicals copper nitrate [Cu(NO3)2⋅3H2O], yttrium nitrate [Y(NO3)3⋅6H2O], sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sulfamethazine (C12H14N4O2S or SMZ), potassium chloride (KCl), monosodium hydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4), disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4), and dimethylformamide (DMF) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Fisher chemical company, Taiwan. Ultrapure deionized water (DI) was used for making the stock solution. Furthermore, to detect sulfamethazine, 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution was employed. Each investigation utilized this solution for a real assessment of the sample. Hence, in the real sample analysis, we collected Tamsui River water from the area around Taipei, Taiwan (25°04′04.4″ N 121°32′15.8″ E) and purchased the milk and honey from the Binjiang local market (25°04′04.4″ N 121°32′15.8″ E) in Taipei, Taiwan.

2.2. Characterization Techniques

The configuration of the samples was examined by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) (Bruker XRD, D2 Phaser, Billerica, MA, USA, λ = 1.540 Å). After the XRD studies, the data were analyzed using MDI JADE5.0 software. The prepared materials’ surface properties were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (Model: Jasco FT-IR-4600). Raman spectroscopy (DXR Raman spectrometer, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyze the Raman shift and symmetry variations. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE–SEM, FEI Quanta FEG 200, H-7600, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 kHz was used to analyze the morphological information. The electrochemical analysis and electrochemical impedance (EIS) were evaluated by the CHI 1211B workstation, these CHI 1211B workstations (CH Instruments, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) were linked to a three-electrode electrochemical cell system, which included an Ag/AgCl electrode as a reference electrode, a GCE as a working electrode, and a Pt needle as a counter electrode (BAS Inc., Tokyo, Japan). All the electrochemical experiments were conducted at room temperature in a N2-purged electrolyte atmosphere.

2.3. Synthesis of Cu2Y2O5 Powder

The Cu2Y2O5 powder was synthesized by following the previous methods [25,26]. In this process, 0.01 M copper nitrate [Cu(NO3)2⋅3H2O] and 0.01 M yttrium nitrate [Y(NO3)3⋅6H2O] were dispersed in purified DI water to obtain a homogenous mixture. The mixture was stirred vigorously to obtain a precursor solution without any precipitates. Then glycine (C2H2NO2) was added to the resulting metal nitrate solution and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for several hours. The glycine-to-metal ratio was estimated at 1.7. The final mixture was kept in a hot air oven to evaporate water and then spontaneously combusted at 350 °C to yield a Cu2Y2O5 powder. This Cu2Y2O5 powder was annealed at 700 °C in the N2 atmosphere to form the Cu2Y2O5 final product.

2.4. Synthesis of g-C3N4 Nanosheets

A thermal oxidative etching approach was used to create the g-C3N4 samples [27]. Then, the following procedure was employed to synthesize the g-C3N4 sample: a semi-closed crucible containing 10 g of urea was covered and brought to 550 °C for a timeframe of six hours at a muffle furnace with 10 °C per minute. After that, the resulting, yellow-colored powder was permitted to naturally cool to room temperature before being thoroughly rinsed with ethanol and distilled water. Further, the collected real samples were evaporated to dry in an oven at 60 °C for 12 h and collected.

2.5. Synthesis of g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 Composites

The hydrothermal approach was implemented to synthesize the g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite. In brief, 260 mg of g-C3N4 powder was submerged in 60 mL of DI water and ultrasonicated for an hour, and the resulting products were consistently agitated with a magnetic stirrer. The equimolar quantities of prepared Cu2Y2O5 were added to the g-C3N4 distribution and persistently agitated with a magnetic stirrer for two hours. Afterward, the resulting solution was shifted to a 100 mL Teflon vessel and fixed at 150 °C for 8 h in an autoclave. After that, precipitates were collected in a centrifuge tube and thoroughly rinsed with ethanol and DI water. Finally, the obtained precipitate powder was evaporated to dry for 12 h at 60 °C and used for further application.

2.6. Preparation of the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 Modified Electrode

To make a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) (surface area 0.07 cm2) appear like a mirror, alumina slurry powder was employed to polish it on a micro fabric pad. To get rid of any surface residue, GCE was ultrasonically cleaned multiple times in DI water and ethanol for roughly five minutes after cleaning. After that, the GCE was dried in a hot air oven at 60 °C and rinsed with DI water. The prepared composite was sonicated for 15 min to form a homogenous suspension. Then, the polished, well-cleaned electrode was utilized for the modification of the electrode, and 8 µL of the prepared composite was coated on the GCE electrode by drop casting. After successful coating with the composite, it was dried in the oven at 60 °C to obtain a GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5-modified electrode and used for further electrochemical studies. The detailed GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5-modified electrode preparation procedure is mentioned in Scheme 1.

2.7. Preparation of Real Samples

Viability for the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5-modified electrode was under consideration using honey, milk, and river water, which were further centrifuged at 5000 rpm for about 10 min before the electrochemical analyses. The reaction solution was passed through a Whatman filter paper to remove unfavorable pollutants. The samples of milk, honey, and water were then diluted 50 times with a phosphate-buffered solution for analysis. The very finely commercially ground SMZ powder was weighed and then dissolved in DMF to prepare a 10 mL (0.1 M) solution, which was used for further investigation. To verify real samples, the synthesized g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite modified with GCE was used for the electrochemical detection of SMZ.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD, Raman, FT-IR, and FESEM Morphology Studies

The crystallinity and structure of the synthesized products were analyzed by XRD patterns. Figure 1A explains the XRD patterns of Cu2Y2O5, g-C3N4 and g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5. The XRD pattern of Cu2Y2O5 indicates the crystalline nature with super-accurate distinct peak intensity; likewise, there were no extra diffraction peaks noted. It was matched with a JCPDS card number 00-33-0511. The XRD pattern of g-C3N4 displays two unique diffraction peaks, at 13.18° and 26.68°. These peaks are related to the crystal lattices (100) and (002); these are linked with the interplanar aromatic stacking (100) planes (JCPDS card number 01-087-1526) [28,29]. In contrast to the bulk g-C3N4, the power of the (002) peak in g-C3N4 nanosheets dropped significantly. They show the successful exfoliation of bulk g-C3N4, as illustrated in Figure 1A. Further, the XRD nature of the g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite is displayed in Figure 1A. The noticeable peaks of Cu2Y2O5 were formed by the crystalline plane. The sharp peak of g-C3N4 was caused by the (002) plane. The crystalline plane overlapped to produce a more dramatic peak than pure g-C3N4 [28]. However, each single distinct plane was seen in the Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 composite; this demonstrated the successful production of the Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 composite.
Figure 1B displays the FTIR spectrum of the material 1224 cm−1, 1316 cm−1, and 1399 cm−1 showing the C-N bond and the peaks in 1540 cm−1, and 1631 cm−1. Additionally, the C=N bond of the synthesis material had retained all of the peaks with the inclusion of g-C3N4. Peaks appeared at 1410 cm−1 and 1564 cm−1 corresponding to C-O stretching of the carboxylate ion bond. The stretching vibration at 3432 cm−1 shows a N-H bond indicating primary amine. The absorption peak at 3725 cm−1 shows O-H stretching bonds, which is the alcohol functional group. The absorption peak at 563 cm−1 and 531 cm−1 shows a Cu-O, Y-O stretching bond.
FE-SEM assessed the surface morphology of the GCE/Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 composite. The link between the layered surfaces of the Cu2Y2O5 and g-C3N4 composite was observed in the morphological structures of produced materials displayed in Figure 1C. EDX mapping of Cu2Y2O5 and g-C3N4 was also used to assess the different compositions of the manufactured materials shown in Figure 1D.

3.2. Electrochemical Properties

Figure 2 demonstrates an examination of the electrochemical behavior of the as-prepared GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode. First, the EIS technique was employed to find modifications in the electrochemical properties of the supporting electrolyte and electrode area. A non-destructive electrochemical technique named EIS can quantify variations in the surface attributes of modified electrodes [30]. Higher frequency sections of the EIS spectra reveal a semicircle representing electron-transfer resistance (Rct), while low-frequency linearity correlates to electron diffusion. The Nyquist curves of bare GCE, GCE/Cu2Y2O5, GCE/g-C3N4, and GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrodes in 0.1 M KCl contain 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− with a stable amplitude of 50 mVs−1. The bare GCE electrodes have greater resistance, so it makes the large semicircle diameter, and the Rct values of bare GCE were found to be 446 Ω. Further, the Rct value of Cu2Y2O5-modified GCE shows the RCT values of 383 Ω, which was caused by Cu2Y2O5 increased electrical conductivity. Additionally, the g-C3N4/GCE electrodes have high conductivity, which explains the existence of g-C3N4-enhanced electron movement and leads to a high surface area. Remarkably, after the inclusion of g-C3N4 with Cu2Y2O5, the Rct value decreased to a low 232 Ω; this is probably caused by the increased electron mobility, surface area, and synergistic effect of the Cu2Y2O5 and g-C3N4 incorporation. Therefore, we have used the GCE/Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 electrode for the SMZ determination due to the high surface area of g-C3N4 and high electrocatalytic properties of Cu2Y2O5, thus allowing the efficient electrochemical sensing of SMZ.
The electron movement in the bare GCE, GCE/Cu2Y2O5, GCE/g-C3N4, and GCE/g- C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 was studied in 0.1 M KCl containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4−/3− in the potential between −0.2 and 0.6 vs. Ag/AgCl at a scan rate of 50 mV/s using CV (Figure 2a). CV data discussed the potential difference (Ep), observed anodic and cathodic peak potentials (Epa and Epc), and oxidation and reduction peak current densities (Ipa and Ipc). Consequently, in contrast to other altered and unaltered electrodes, the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 had a lower Ep and more intriguing redox peak currents caused by a specific electrostatic interaction between the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 surface and [Fe(CN)6]4−/3− ions. The modified electrodes, like the bare/GCE electrodes, and their electrochemical active surface area (A) for GCE/Cu2Y2O5, GCE/g-C3N4, and GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 were calculated using CV in [Fe(CN)6]4−/3− solution containing 0.1 M KCl at various sweep scan rate speeds (v) using the Randles–Sevcik equation [31]. In contrast, the scan rates increased, and the current of Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4/GCE increased, as seen in Figure 2b. The square root of the graph of the scan rate vs. redox current is shown in Figure 2c. The conductive surface area was to be calculated by Randles–-Sevcik (Equation (1)) for bare GCE, GCE/g-C3N4, GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5, and GCE/Cu2Y2O5 [32] as follows:
Ip = 2.69 × 105 An3/2 C D½ ν½
where “A” denotes the modified electrode’s surface area, “n” denotes the count of electrons in a reaction, “C” denotes the [Fe(CN)6]4−/3− electrolyte concentration in bulk solution (5 mM), “D1/2” denotes the square root of the diffusion coefficient, and “v1/2” denotes the square root of the scan rate. The active surface area was calculated for bare GCE (0.0273 cm2), GCE/Cu2Y2O5 (0.0320 cm2), GCE/g-C3N4 (0.0367 cm2), and GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 (0.0369 cm2). From low to high, the peak current intensity is arranged as follows: bare GCE < GCE/Cu2Y2O5 < GCE/g-C3N4 < GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5. The following Equation (2) was applied to calculate the rates of charge transfer coefficient (Ks) [33].
Rct = RT/(n2 F2 K(s) C)
In this case, “K(s)” denotes the transfer of charges rate, “n” denotes the count of electrons, “C” denotes the [Fe(CN)6]−4/−3 concentration, and “R, T, and F” maintain its unique significance [28,34]. The electrical characteristic results confirm that the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite has a greater charge transfer rate, a lower ΔEp, a faster electron transfer rate, a higher active surface, and a higher current density than GCE/Cu2Y2O5 and GCE/g-C3N4 electrodes.

3.3. Electrochemical Performance Using SMZ Using Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4

The performance of GCE/Cu2Y2O5-, GCE/g-C3N4-, and GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5-modified electrodes was investigated utilizing SMZ bare electrodes with the help of CV and 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7.0) at 100 mVs−1. In addition to 50 μM SMZ, Figure 3a explains the CV profiles of electrodes that have been altered and unaltered. In the beginning, the bare GCE surface did not exhibit any oxidation peak. However, upon the addition of 50 μM SMZ, this observation was confirmed. After the alteration of the bare GCE, GCE/Cu2Y2O5, g-C3N4, GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 for the sensing of SMZ with the addition of 50 μM, the spot of the oxidation potential was noted at +0.90 V with this current density (Ipa) of −7.1 μA/cm2, +0.91 V with current density of −8.3 μA/cm2, and +0.91 with current density of −8.9 μA/cm2, respectively. It was demonstrated that the electrodes’ kinetics of charge transfer to SMZ oxidation were low. The electrodes, SMZ oxidation potential, and oxidation current density were plotted on a graph. Interestingly, the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 for SMZ sensing had a considerable oxidation potential of +0.91 V and a greater oxidation current density of around −8.9 μA/cm2. This was in comparison to the other electrodes due to the synergistic effect of π-π stacking interplay between SMZ and GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode, which may enhance the effectiveness of electrocatalytic oxidation for SMZ detection [35]. Additionally, the g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite features a layered structure that speeds up the oxidation of SMZ on the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 surface, a wide surface area, additional diffusion pathways, high capacitance, good capacitance, and good conductivity. The electrochemical oxidation process of SMZ in the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode is displayed in Scheme 2. The irreversible oxidation in the amine group (-NH2) in SMZ by 2e and 2H+ movement results in hydroxylamine (-NHOH), as indicated by the oxidation peak [36]. These findings show that the SMZ oxidation reaction is a slow, irreversible process of electron transfer since the reverse scan displays an anodic peak in place of a cathodic peak due to the amine groups oxidation to the -NHOH group and subsequent loss of two electrons. Therefore, we believe that the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite serves as a workable mediator of electron transport for SMZ detection [37].
When 0.1 M (PH 07) phosphate-buffered solution was used to test the concentration analysis of SMZ, the cathodic peaks increased gradually with the insertion of 10–190 μM. Figure 3. displays the current density vs. SMZ concentration linear plot. Taking this into consideration, fast electron transport and electro-oxidation of SMZ oxidation were demonstrated over the modified GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode.

3.4. Effect of Scan Rate

In any electrochemical sensor, the scan rate greatly influences the modified electrodes to behave during electrocatalysis. As shown in Figure 4, CVs were tested using g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5-modified GCE, changing the scan rate from 20 to 200 mV/s in detail to know about the electro-oxidation of SMZ [38]. The kinetic restriction and mass transfer may have caused the anodic peak potentials to shift over time to the positive side [34]. The anodic current swings according to the square root of the scan rate, which indicates the peak potential moves to the positive side for SMZ oxidation at the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode. An electrode diffusion process powers an irreversible reaction with a changed electrode surface. This figure illustrates the linearity range among the square root of the scan rate (mV/s) and the oxidation peak current (Ipa). The linear equation was found to be Ipa (μA) = 0.4015 (mV/s) + 2.0267, with an R2 value of 0.9902. Using the Epa and lnν relationship, the Laviron equation (Equation (3)) is used to figure out the number of electrons delivered throughout the irreversible oxidation of SMZ [28,39].
E p a = E 0 + R T α n F ln R T k 0 α n F + R T α n F ln ν
Here “T” is the temperature, “R” is the gas constant, “F” is the Faraday constant, “n” is the number of electrons transported during the chemical process, and “α” is the charge transfer coefficient. The relation led to the calculation of “αn” as 0.8. Because SMZ oxidation is irreversible, it was expected that the coefficient of charge transfer would be 0.5. As a result, “n” was computed as 1.6, meaning that during SMZ oxidation, two electrons took part in the electro-oxidation process on the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode.

3.5. Effect of pH

An earlier study found that the solution pH level significantly affects the redox activity of electroactive molecules at the proximity [26]. In the SMZ oxidation process, the operating electrolyte’s pH is also vital. Using the CV approach demonstrated above, the electrochemical activity of 50 μM SMZ in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution at various pH levels starting from 3 to 11 was examined and is shown in Figure 4. The pH of the electrolytes had an impact on the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode determination ability for SMZ sensing. The oxidation peak current intensity rose from 3 to 7, then progressively fell at high pH values. The voltammogram’s sensitivity increased at pH 7. The protonation/deprotonation mechanism of SMZ caused fluctuations in its oxidation response. At pH 7.0, a high anodic current (Ipa) was achieved. Taking these results into account the complete voltammetric experiment’s initial point was found to be 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution at pH 7.0 to facilitate future research. The peak potential negative shift showed that pH fluctuations, as well as H+ and charge transfer when pH increased, had an impact on it [39]. The scientific relationship between pH and Epa can be understood using the Nernst equation (Equation (4)) that follows.
E p a = E 0 + 0.0591 n l o g O X a R b 0.0591 m n p H
Here “m” denotes the number of protons, “n” the number of electrons engaged in the electro-chemical process, “a” and “b” the oxidant and reductant coefficients, and so on [40]. The oxidation peak potential (Epa) vs. pH is represented in the calibration plots shown in Figure 4c,d.

3.6. Analytical Performance of the Proposed Sensor

In this work, the amperometry technique was employed to see if the RRDE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 was able to detect SMZ just as well as comparable sensors. Compared to other voltammetric methods, the amperometric approach has higher precision, is more sensitive, and requires less background current [25]. A calibration curve was used to determine the enhanced electrode sensitivity, linear range, and limit of detection (LOD). The g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite for modified rotating ring disc electrode (RRDE) amperometric response is depicted in Figure 5a. Following each addition of a different concentration of SMZ into nitrogen-saturated phosphate-buffered solution that is constantly agitated at a rotational speed of 780 rpm with the applied potential held at +0.92 V. Every time SMZ was added, the sensor displayed a crisp amperometric response over a consistent period (50 s). The constant current response of SMZ was obtained at the electrode modified with an RRDE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite in less than 3 s and demonstrated a quick response to SMZ oxidation. Figure 5b displays the calibration plot of peak current response against the SMZ concentration. Figure 5b shows the equation for the relevant linear regression as follows: Ip(A) = 0.0221 × [SMZ (μM)] + 2.9419. It was predicted that the sensing capacity of the sensor was 8.86 μA μM−1 cm−2 from the slope.
Additionally, the LOD was determined to be 0.23 µm (LOD = 3 Sb/S, where Sb is the standard deviation of the signal and S is the slope value). The constructed sensor, notably, had a linear response from 2 μM to 276 μM. This determined the excellent catalytic oxidation of SMZ at the g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite-altered RRDE. Furthermore, because of its excellent electron transport qualities and uniformly electron-rich environment, RRDE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 was determined to be a key factor in the oxidation of SMZ based on earlier research. However, Cu2Y2O5 dramatically reduced the SMZ oxidation overpotential, aiding in minimizing power consumption and supporting the prevention of interferences. Furthermore, C3N4’s large surface area offers more reaction area for its synergy with Cu2Y2O5, making the composite an excellent choice for electrocatalytic reactions. Additionally, improving the electrocatalysis of SMZ was greatly aided by the positive synergistic interaction between g-C3N4 and Cu2Y2O5 [28,35].
Nanomaterials have been used in previous works in electroanalytical methods to modify the electrodes to determine the SMZ samples (Table 1). In comparison, a two-electrode sensor system for rapid detection of sulfonamides by applying the Nafion-carboxyl multiwalled carbon nanotube powder microelectrode by B. He et al. found a limit of detection (LOD) of 8.94 µM [41]. A novel electroanalytical assay for sulfamethazine determination in food samples based on conducting polymer composite-modified electrodes by Y. L. Su et al. found a limit of detection of 0.16 µM [41]. Moreover, magnetic hyper-crosslinked polystyrene used for sulfonamides from water and milk samples before their HPLC determination by V.V. Tolmacheva et al. found a LOD of 0.25 µM [42]. T.N. Rao et al.’s diamond electrodes used for the detection of sulfa drug determination by amperometric and HPLC detection found a LOD of 0.05 µM [43]. The occurrence and removal of antibiotics, hormones, and several other pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants of the largest industrial city of Korea by Behera et al. found a LOD of 0.055 µM [44]. Development of an electrochemical sensor for the determination of antibiotic sulfamethazine in cow milk using graphene oxide decorated with Cu-Ag core–shell nanoparticles by A. Feizollahi et al. found a LOD of 0.46 [42].

3.7. Selectivity, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Storage Stability Studies

One of the most crucial features of the proposed sensor is selectivity. Multiple biological species coexist for real-time utilization purposes to determine whether SMZ sensing was hampered by the sensing platform. The effects of the relationship induced by the electrochemical behavior of the proposed sensor signal were examined. The GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode selectivity was measured, in this case, using the DPV technique when there is a 10-fold concentration of frequently hindering biomolecules like metal, ascorbic acid, dopamine, and carbendazim, as well as common cations like sodium and ammonium, as well as anions like chloride and fluoride. This outcome shows the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5-modified electrode has great accurate sensitivity towards SMZ. Unexpectedly, the oxidation capability of SMZ remained unaltered after the insertion of the biomolecules claimed earlier. So, the observation suggests that the impact of chemical intervenors was negligible.
The selective oxidation towards SMZ might be quickened by a favorable π-π stacking contact that occurs among the SMZ molecule and the Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 composite. Furthermore, the hindering molecules’ oxidation potential was in contrast to the range of oxidation of the SMZ. Therefore, it does not interrupt the SMZ oxidation current density [35]. Additionally, the sensor’s stability, repeatability, and reproducibility were examined for SMZ oxidation and are displayed in Figure 6a–d. This is why the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrodes were prepared five times independently to be able to assess the reliability of the sensors. The experiment of testing 50 μM SMZ at the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode multiple times was employed to examine the sensor’s repeatability and stability. Long-term stability was assessed after storing it for approximately 1, 7, 14, 21, and 30 days. The sensors kept 93.8% of the responses. The sensors showed excellent reproducibility in the same procedure. Additionally, Figure 6e shows the long-usage stability of the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode utilizing continuous CV monitoring for 100 segments in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution. During this period, the electrode current responsiveness only dropped by about 12%. The outcomes verified that, following analyses and extended periods of storage, the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 had demonstrated outstanding stability. Additionally, 50 s intervals were used to spike 10 μM and 20 μM of SMZ in the amperometry stability investigation, determined up to 2000 s. After stability testing, the prepared sensor maintained 98.79% of its initial efficiency.

3.8. Real Sample Analysis

Assessing the potential threats that pharmaceutical toxicity may pose to human health and the environment requires real sample monitoring. It has contributed to the practical application of the g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite-modified GCE in SMZ determination in real sample analysis. As previously noted, real samples are typically free of SMZ. Examples of such samples are milk, blood serum, poultry, fish, meat, honey, water, etc. [3,28]. Hence, real samples were added with a predetermined amount of SMZ utilizing standard addition methods (Scheme 3).
The GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode was evaluated for its practicality in identifying SMZ in real samples of cow milk, honey, and Tamsui river water using the DPV approach (Figure 7a–c). The range of SMZ recovery rates was 92–98%. These results demonstrated that the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode was used with satisfactory results to analyze SMZ in real samples. The recovery percentage findings are displayed in Table 2. Even when milk, honey, or Tamsui river water contains other interfering molecules, the DPV approach uniquely finds SMZ. Because the SMZ detection peak potential and peak current were not affected by other interfering molecules, such as anions, cations, metal ions, and other biomolecules, the developed GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode is the ideal match for the accurate and successful sensing of SMZ from the real sample in the presence of other interfering molecules. According to the real sample analysis, the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode shows good sensing feasibility for SMZ detection.

4. Conclusions

It was discovered that the electrode fabricated with GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 was effective in the electrocatalytic oxidation of SMZ. About the electro-oxidation of SMZ, it was noted that the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode is a cutting-edge electrocatalyst. The Cu2Y2O5, g-C3N4, and g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composites were examined by XRD, Raman, FT-IR, FE-SEM, and EDX studies. Cyclic voltammetry and amperometry methods were employed for the selective use of a GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode for the electro-oxidation of SMZ. Additionally, important kinetic characteristics of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode rate constant (K(s)) and effective surface area were calculated. The GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 can be performed towards the detection of SMZ from a line range up to 276 μM, with a LOD of 0.23 μM and linear range 2 to 276 µM by the amperometry method. It was further confirmed that the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode is repeatable. Over 30 days, the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode showed good stability, repeatability, and reproducibility. Lastly, the increased precision of the g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 fabricated electrode effectively made use of SMZ detection in food and water samples. Another benefit is that the proposed sensor exhibits a low detection limit with the highest sensitivity and will be used to build commercial electrodes in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S., S.S. and G.A.M.; methodology, R.S., S.S., G.A.M., C.-L.Y. and T.-W.C.; software, R.S., S.S. and G.A.M.; validation, R.S., S.S. and G.A.M.; formal analysis, R.S., S.S. and C.-L.Y.; investigation, R.S. and S.S.; resources, S.S. and T.-W.C.; data curation, R.S., S.S. and G.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S., S.S. and G.A.M.; writing—review and editing, R.S., S.S. and G.A.M.; visualization R.S., S.S. and G.A.M.; supervision, S.S. and T.-W.C.; project administration, S.S. and T.-W.C.; funding acquisition, S.S. and T.-W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (NSTC 112-2221-E-027-039), (112-2221-E-027-032-) and (113-2221-E-027-018-).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for studies not involving humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be provided by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the measuring capabilities provided by the Precision Research and Analysis Center of the National Taipei University of Technology (NTUT).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Baran, W.; Adamek, E.; Ziemianska, J.; Sobczak, A. Effects of the presence of sulfonamides in the environment and their influence on human health. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 196, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Krakstrom, M.; Saeid, S.; Tolvanen, P.; Salmi, T.; Eklund, P.; Kronberg, L. Catalytic ozonation of the antibiotic sulfadiazine: Reaction kinetics and transformation mechanisms. Chemosphere 2020, 247, 125853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mutharani, B.; Chen, T.W.; Chen, S.M.; Liu, X. Reversibly switchable ruthenium hybrid thermo-responsive electrocatalyst-based voltammetric sensor for sensitive detection of sulfamethazine in milk samples. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 316, 128103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Campana, A.M.G.; Gracia, L.G.; Lara, F.J.; Del, M.; Iruela, O.; Blanco, C.C. Applications of capillary electrophoresis to the determination of antibiotics in food and environmental samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395, 967–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gaudin, V.; Pavy, M.L. Determination of sulfamethazine in milk by biosensor immunoassay. J. Aoac. Int. 1999, 82, 1316–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zeng, D.; Ong, W.J.; Zheng, H.; Wu, M.; Chen, Y.; Peng, D.L.; Han, M.Y. Ni12P5 nanoparticles embedded into porous g-C3N4 nanosheets as a noble-metal-free hetero-structure photocatalyst for efficient H2 production under visible light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 16171–16178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, S.; Zhu, H.; Yao, W.; Chen, K.; Chen, D. One-step synthesis of P-doped g-C3N4 with the enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 430, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vu, N.N.; Nguyen, C.C.; Kaliaguine, S.; Do, T.O. Synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheets by using a highly condensed lamellar crystalline melamine–cyanuric acid supramolecular complex for enhanced solar hydrogen generation. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Baumgarten, L.G.; Dreyer, J.P.; Campos, C.E.M.D.; Germano, A.T.; Vitali, L.; Spinelli, A.; Santana, E.R.; Joao, P.W.; Vieira, I.C. Two-dimensional titanium carbide MXene embedded in exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets for voltammetric sensing of thiamethoxam in beekeeping products. Electrochim. Acta 2024, 494, 144423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Siegrist, T. Applications of the crystallographic search and analysis system CRYSTDAT in materials science. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan. 1989, 94, 1. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, Z.; Luo, F.; Wang, N.; Li, X. Cu-Y2O3 catalyst derived from Cu2Y2O5 perovskite for water gas shift reaction: The effect of reduction temperature. Catalysts 2022, 12, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Z.; Long, H.K.; Hao, C.; Hui, Y.J. Preparation and modification of Y2Cu2O5/Y2O3 photocatalysts for H2 evolution under simulated sunlight irradiation. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 239–242, 3001–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chiu, T.W.; Chang, C.H.; Yang, L.W.; Wang, Y.P. Preparation of transparent Cu2Y2O5 thin films by RF magnetron sputtering. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 354, 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Racu, A.V.; Baies, R.; Popuri, S.R.; Pascariu, M.C.; Niculescu, M.; Banica, R. Rapid combustion synthesis of Cu2Y2O5 as a precursor for CuYO2 delafossite. Mater. Today Commun. 2018, 14, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Augustin, A.; Chuaicham, C.; Shanmugam, M.; Vellaichamy, B.; Rajendran, S.; Hoang, T.K.A.; Sasaki, K.; Sekar, K. Recent development of organic–inorganic hybrid photocatalysts for biomass conversion into hydrogen production. Nanoscale Adv. 2022, 4, 2561–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, Z.; Chen, Y.; Ma, T.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, J.; Pan, H.; Sun, W. 2D Metal-free nanomaterials beyond graphene and its analogues toward electrocatalysis applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, M.; He, B. Ultrasensitive sandwich-type electrochemical biosensor based on octahedral gold nanoparticles modified poly (ethylenimine) functionalized graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets for the determination of sulfamethazine. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 329, 129158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vinoth, S.; Shalini Devi, K.S.; Pandikumar, A. A comprehensive review on graphitic carbon nitride-based electrochemical and biosensors for environmental and healthcare applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 140, 116274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, S.; Zhao, W.; Lin, G.; Wu, Q.; Xu, M.; Huang, X.; Luo, J.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, X. Long conducting and water-compatible polymer/carbon nanotubes nanocomposite with “Beads-on-a-String” structure as a highly effective electrochemical sensing material. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 3556–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bai, W.; Sheng, Q.; Ma, X.; Zheng, J. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles based on hydrophobic interface regulation and its application of electrochemical catalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1600–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Niu, P.; Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.M. Graphene-like carbon nitride nanosheets for improved photocatalytic activities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4763–4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sriram, B.; Baby, J.N.; Hsu, Y.F.; Wang, S.F.; BenadictJoseph, X.; George, M.; Veerakumar, P.; Lin, K.C. MnCo2O4 microflowers anchored on P-doped g-C3N4 nanosheets as an electrocatalyst for voltammetric determination of the antibiotic drug sulfadiazine. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 3915–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, H.Y.; Ruan, L.W.; Jiang, X.; Qiu, L.G. Trace detection of nitro aromatic explosives by highly fluorescent g-C3N4 nanosheets. Analyst 2015, 140, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Garcia-Galan, M.J.; Diaz-Cruz, M.S.; Barcelo, D. Occurrence of sulfonamide residues along the Ebro basin: Removal in wastewater treatment plants and environmental impact assessment. Environ. Int. 2011, 37, 462–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baby, J.N.; Sriram, B.; Wang, S.F.; George, M. Integration of samarium vanadate/carbon nanofiber through synergy: An elec-trochemical tool for sulfadiazine analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karthika, R.; Vinoth Kumar, J.; Chen, S.M.; Kokulnathan, T.; Chen, T.W.; Sakthinathan, S.; Chiu, T.W.; Muthuraj, V. Development of novel 3D flower-like praseodymium molybdate decorated reduced graphene oxide: An efficient and selective electrocatalyst for the detection of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor methyl parathion. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2018, 270, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Tan, S.; Xia, Y.; Shi, J.; Chen, W.; Gao, L. In-situ generated SrWO4/g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalyst for enhanced visible light degradation activity of tetracycline. Colloids Surf. A 2022, 643, 128806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bard, A.J.; Faulkner, L.R.; White, H.S. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  29. Anupriya, J.; Rajakumaran, R.; Chen, S.M.; Senthilkumar, T. Samarium tungstate anchored on graphitic carbon nitride com-posite: A novel electrocatalyst for the ultra-selective electrocatalytic detection of 8-hydroxy-5-nitroquinoline in water and bi-ological samples. Colloids Surf. A 2022, 632, 127820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rajendran, J.; Reshetilov, A.N.; Sundramoorthy, A.K.J.M.A. Electrochemically exfoliated graphene/poly (3,4-methylenedioxy-thiophene) nanocomposite-based electrochemical sensor for the detection of nicotine. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 3336–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Veerakumar, P.; Jaysiva, G.; Chen, S.M.; Lin, K.C. Development of palladium on bismuth sulfide nanorods as a bifunctional nanomaterial for efficient electrochemical detection and photoreduction of Hg(II) Ions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 5908–5920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sriram, B.; Baby, J.N.; Hsu, Y.F.; Wang, S.F.; George, M. Synergy of the LaVO(4)/h-BN nanocomposite: A highly active elec-trocatalyst for the rapid analysis of carbendazim. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 5271–5281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Xu, D.; Chen, L.; Qiu, X.; Zhu, Y. Graphitic carbon nitride for photoelectrochemical detection of environmental pollutants. ACS ES&T Eng. 2022, 2, 140–157. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jerome, R.; Sundramoorthy, A.K. Preparation of hexagonal boron nitride doped graphene film modified sensor for selective electrochemical detection of nicotine in tobacco sample. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1132, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vignesh, A.; Vajeeston, P.; Pannipara, M.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Xia, Y.; Kumar, G.G. Bimetallic metal-organic framework derived 3D hierarchical NiO/Co3O4/C hollow microspheres on biodegradable garbage bag for sensitive, selective, and flexible enzyme-free electrochemical glucose detection. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 133157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kokulnathan, T.; Wang, J.W.; Ahmed, F.; Alshahrani, T. Synthesis of 3D flower-like zinc-chromium layered double hydroxides: A functional electrode material for furaltadone detection. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 176, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vinoth Kumar, J.; Kokulnathan, T.; Chen, S.M.; Chen, T.W.; Elgorban, A.M.; Elshikh, M.S.; Marraiki, N.; Nagarajan, E.R. Two-dimensional copper tungstate nanosheets: Application toward the electrochemical detection of Mesalazine. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 18279–18287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Nie, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, R.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H. PPy-Functionalized NiFe2O4 nanocomposites toward highly selectivePb2+ electrochemical sensing. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 6082–6093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tolmacheva, V.V.; Apyari, V.V.; Furletov, A.A.; Dmitrienko, S.G.; Zolotov, Y.A. Facile synthesis of magnetic hyper crosslinked polystyrene and its application in the magnetic solid-phase extraction of sulfonamides from water and milk samples before their HPLC determination. Talanta 2016, 152, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Su, Y.L.; Cheng, S.H. A novel electroanalytical assay for sulfamethazine determination in food samples based on conducting polymer nanocomposite-modified electrodes. Talanta 2018, 180, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chiu, T.W.; Yu, B.S.; Wang, Y.R.; Chen, K.T.; Lin, Y.T. Synthesis of nanosized CuCrO2 porous powders via a self-combustion glycine nitrate process. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 2933–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Feizollahi, A.; Rafati Parnaz Assari, A.A.; Joghani, R.A. Development of an electrochemical sensor for the determination of antibiotic sulfamethazine in cow milk using graphene oxide decorated with Cu–Ag core-shell nanoparticles. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 910–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cesarino, I.; Simoes, R.P.; Lavarda, F.C.; Batagin-Neto, A. Electrochemical oxidation of sulfamethazine on a glassy carbon electrode modified with graphene and gold nanoparticles. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 192, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. He, B.; Chen, W. Two-electrode sensor system for rapid detection of sulfonamides by applying the Nafion-carboxyl multiwalled carbon nanotubes powder microelectrode. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016, 11, 10362–10378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rao, T.N.; Sarada, B.V.; Tryk, D.A.; Fujishima, A. Electroanalytical study of sulfa drugs at diamond electrodes and their deter-mination by HPLC with amperometric detection. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2000, 491, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Behera, S.K.; Kim, H.W.; Oh, J.E.; Park, H.S. Occurrence and removal of antibiotics, hormones, and several other pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants of the largest industrial city of Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 4351–4360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Veach, A.M.; Bernot, M.J. Temporal variation of pharmaceuticals in an urban and agriculturally influenced stream. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 4553–4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Govindaraj, M.; Rajendran, J.; Udhaya Ganesh, P.K.; Muthukumaran, M.K.; Jayaraman, B. Graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets decorated with strontium tungstate nanospheres as an electrochemical transducer for sulfamethazine sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 930–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode preparation and application to SMZ detection.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode preparation and application to SMZ detection.
Sensors 24 05844 sch001
Figure 1. (A) XRD patterns of g-C3N4, Cu2Y2O5, and g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5. (B) FT-IR spectra of g-C3N4, Cu2Y2O5, and g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite. (C) FESEM images (ac) g-C3N4. (df) Cu2Y2O5. (gi) g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite. (D) Elemental mapping region of (a) g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite. Elemental mapping of (b) Y, (c) C, (d) Cu, (e) N, (f) O, and (g) EDX spectra of g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite.
Figure 1. (A) XRD patterns of g-C3N4, Cu2Y2O5, and g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5. (B) FT-IR spectra of g-C3N4, Cu2Y2O5, and g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite. (C) FESEM images (ac) g-C3N4. (df) Cu2Y2O5. (gi) g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite. (D) Elemental mapping region of (a) g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite. Elemental mapping of (b) Y, (c) C, (d) Cu, (e) N, (f) O, and (g) EDX spectra of g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 composite.
Sensors 24 05844 g001
Figure 2. (a) CV for bare GCE, GCE/Cu2Y2O5, GCE/g-C3N4, GCE/Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 in 0.1 M KCl contain 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− and (b) CV studies of Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 at various scan rates (different color indicate for different scan rate). (c) calibration plot for potential vs. peak current. (d) EIS spectra of bare GCE, Cu2Y2O5/GCE, g-C3N4/GCE, Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4/GCE.
Figure 2. (a) CV for bare GCE, GCE/Cu2Y2O5, GCE/g-C3N4, GCE/Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 in 0.1 M KCl contain 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− and (b) CV studies of Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 at various scan rates (different color indicate for different scan rate). (c) calibration plot for potential vs. peak current. (d) EIS spectra of bare GCE, Cu2Y2O5/GCE, g-C3N4/GCE, Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4/GCE.
Sensors 24 05844 g002
Scheme 2. Irreversible electro-oxidation reaction mechanism of SMZ over the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode.
Scheme 2. Irreversible electro-oxidation reaction mechanism of SMZ over the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode.
Sensors 24 05844 sch002
Figure 3. (a) Cyclic voltammogram of bare GCE, GCE/g-C3N4, GCE/Cu2Y2O5, and GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 in 0.05 M phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7) with 50 μM of SMZ. (b) Bar diagram of different electrode responses. (c) CV curves of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode at different concentrations of SMZ (10–200 μM) (different color indicate for different concentration). (d) Correspondence to the calibration plot vs. SMZ concentrations.
Figure 3. (a) Cyclic voltammogram of bare GCE, GCE/g-C3N4, GCE/Cu2Y2O5, and GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 in 0.05 M phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7) with 50 μM of SMZ. (b) Bar diagram of different electrode responses. (c) CV curves of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode at different concentrations of SMZ (10–200 μM) (different color indicate for different concentration). (d) Correspondence to the calibration plot vs. SMZ concentrations.
Sensors 24 05844 g003
Figure 4. (a) CV responses of the electrode GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 in phosphate-buffered solution with 50 μM of SMZ at various scan rates (different color indicate for different scan rates), (b) calibration plot of the scan rate vs. SMZ determination peak current, (c) cyclic voltammogram of electrode Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 in phosphate-buffered solution containing 50 μM SMZ at various pH levels (3–11), (d) pH vs. Ep, (e) pH vs. Ip.
Figure 4. (a) CV responses of the electrode GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 in phosphate-buffered solution with 50 μM of SMZ at various scan rates (different color indicate for different scan rates), (b) calibration plot of the scan rate vs. SMZ determination peak current, (c) cyclic voltammogram of electrode Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 in phosphate-buffered solution containing 50 μM SMZ at various pH levels (3–11), (d) pH vs. Ep, (e) pH vs. Ip.
Sensors 24 05844 g004
Figure 5. (a) Amperometry response for oxidation of SMZ with various concentrations in phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7.0) at RRDE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5-altered electrode. (b) Calibration plot for the peak current vs. concentration. (c) Selectivity of the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 in phosphate-buffered solution with the addition of a 10-fold concentration of interference molecules by DPV. (d) Operational stability studies of the RRD/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrodes.
Figure 5. (a) Amperometry response for oxidation of SMZ with various concentrations in phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7.0) at RRDE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5-altered electrode. (b) Calibration plot for the peak current vs. concentration. (c) Selectivity of the GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 in phosphate-buffered solution with the addition of a 10-fold concentration of interference molecules by DPV. (d) Operational stability studies of the RRD/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrodes.
Sensors 24 05844 g005
Figure 6. (a) Repeatability test of electrode GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 in the presence of SMZ and (b) Bar diagram of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode with different segments. (c) The reproducibility test of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode in the presence of SMZ and (d) Bar diagram of different modified GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrodes. (e) Cyclic stability of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode.
Figure 6. (a) Repeatability test of electrode GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 in the presence of SMZ and (b) Bar diagram of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode with different segments. (c) The reproducibility test of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode in the presence of SMZ and (d) Bar diagram of different modified GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrodes. (e) Cyclic stability of GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode.
Sensors 24 05844 g006
Scheme 3. Real sample analysis and reaction mechanism of the proposed GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode sensor.
Scheme 3. Real sample analysis and reaction mechanism of the proposed GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode sensor.
Sensors 24 05844 sch003
Figure 7. The determination of SMZ in (a) milk, (b) honey, and (c) river water samples (different color indicate for different concentration).
Figure 7. The determination of SMZ in (a) milk, (b) honey, and (c) river water samples (different color indicate for different concentration).
Sensors 24 05844 g007
Table 1. The proposed GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 sensor was compared with previously reported determination techniques.
Table 1. The proposed GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 sensor was compared with previously reported determination techniques.
TechniqueElectrodesLinear Range (µM)LOD (μM)References
CVGCE/rGO/AuNPs--[43]
i-tPME/N-MWCNT10–1008.94[44]
SWVSPCE/PEDOT/MnO21.0–5000.16[40]
MSPE-HPLC-i-tGCE2.0–2000.25[39]
HPLC-i-tBDD0.05–5000.05[45]
DPVAuNSs/LIPG0.4–1000.055[46]
i-tSN/rGO/GCE0.009–1280.006[47]
SWVCu-Ag core-shell/GO/GCE10–10000.46[42]
CVCar/MWCNTs/GCE0.50–1100.02–0.09[48]
i-tCu2Y2O5/g-C3N4/GCE2–2760.23This work
Table 2. Determination of SMZ levels in the milk, honey, and river water samples using GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode.
Table 2. Determination of SMZ levels in the milk, honey, and river water samples using GCE/g-C3N4/Cu2Y2O5 electrode.
SampleAdded (µM)Found (µM)Recovery %
Milk109.37 (4.35 µA)93%
2019.5 (10.2 µA)97%
3028.2 (16.1 µA)96%
Honey109.6 (4.9 µA)96%
2019.77 (10.6 µA)98%
3029.1 (16.7 µA)97%
River water109.2 (6.6 µA)92%
2018.92 (15.5 µA)94%
3029.03 (18.7 µA)96%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Surya, R.; Sakthinathan, S.; Meenakshi, G.A.; Yu, C.-L.; Chiu, T.-W. Construction of Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 Novel Composite for the Sensitive and Selective Trace-Level Electrochemical Detection of Sulfamethazine in Food and Water Samples. Sensors 2024, 24, 5844. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175844

AMA Style

Surya R, Sakthinathan S, Meenakshi GA, Yu C-L, Chiu T-W. Construction of Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 Novel Composite for the Sensitive and Selective Trace-Level Electrochemical Detection of Sulfamethazine in Food and Water Samples. Sensors. 2024; 24(17):5844. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175844

Chicago/Turabian Style

Surya, Rajendran, Subramanian Sakthinathan, Ganesh Abinaya Meenakshi, Chung-Lun Yu, and Te-Wei Chiu. 2024. "Construction of Cu2Y2O5/g-C3N4 Novel Composite for the Sensitive and Selective Trace-Level Electrochemical Detection of Sulfamethazine in Food and Water Samples" Sensors 24, no. 17: 5844. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175844

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop