Next Article in Journal
A Single-Shot Scattering Medium Imaging Method via Bispectrum Truncation
Previous Article in Journal
Correcting Hardening Artifacts of Aero-Engine Blades with an Iterative Linear Fitting Technique Framework
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 24
Issue 6
10.3390/s24062003
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction to Sensors 2023, 23(13), 6026.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026

by
Jin-Young Min
1 and
Kyoung-Bok Min
2,3,*
1
Veterans Medical Research Institute, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul 05368, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
3
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(6), 2003; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062003
Submission received: 4 February 2024 / Accepted: 8 February 2024 / Published: 21 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Biosensors)
Versions Notes

Text Correction

There were five errors in the original article [1].
  • In Abstract, instead of “Forty-one older adults were measured for ASM and physical performance with two BIA devices”, it should read: “Forty older adults were measured for ASM and physical performance with two BIA devices”.
  • Section 2.1, Study Population, Paragraph 1, instead of “Forty-one individuals (men (n = 27) and women (n = 14)) volunteered”, it should read: “Forty individuals (men (n = 26) and women (n = 14)) volunteered”.
  • Section 2.1, Study Population, Paragraph 3, and Institutional Review Board Statement section, instead of “All procedures used in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB no. BOHUN 2023-01-066)”, it should read: “(IRB no. BOHUN 2023-02-014)”.
  • Section 2.4, Statistical Analysis, Paragraph 1, instead of “We had recruited 41 participants with an anticipated dropout rate of 15%”, it should read: “We had recruited 40 participants with an anticipated dropout rate of 11%”.
  • There was a mistake in the published version of Table 1. The number of study population should be “40” instead of “41”. The mean + SD for the males should be “26 (65.00%)” instead of “27 (65.85%)”.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population (n = 40).
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population (n = 40).
VariablesMean ± SD
Age (years)74.49 ± 3.57
Male, n (%)26 (65.00%)
Weight (kg)63.49 ± 9.40
Height (cm)162.02 ± 7.28
Body mass index (kg/m2)24.15 ± 2.99
The authors apologize for any convenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original article has been updated.

Reference

  1. Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of two bioelectrical impedance devices and manual versus sensor-based short physical performance batteries for assessment of muscle mass and physical performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026. Sensors 2024, 24, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062003

AMA Style

Min J-Y, Min K-B. Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026. Sensors. 2024; 24(6):2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Min, Jin-Young, and Kyoung-Bok Min. 2024. "Correction: Min, J.-Y.; Min, K.-B. Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance. Sensors 2023, 23, 6026" Sensors 24, no. 6: 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24062003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop