Next Article in Journal
PM2.5 Pollution Decrease in Paris, France, for the 2013–2024 Period: An Evaluation of the Local Source Contributions by Subtracting the Effect of Wind Speed
Previous Article in Journal
Measurement of Force and Position Using a Cantilever Beam and Multiple Strain Gauges: Sensing Principles and Design Considerations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cough-Induced Contraction Response Time and Strength of the Pelvic Floor Muscles Between Women with and Without Stress Urinary Incontinence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Task Dependency of Spontaneous Rhythmic Performance in Movements Beyond Established Biomechanical Models: An Inertial Sensor-Based Study

by
Analina Emmanouil
*,
Fani Paderi
,
Konstantinos Boudolos
and
Elissavet Rousanoglou
School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 172 37 Daphne, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(21), 6565; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216565 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 September 2025 / Revised: 12 October 2025 / Accepted: 20 October 2025 / Published: 24 October 2025

Abstract

Spontaneous rhythmic performance is a fundamental feature of human movement, well established in biomechanical models (EBMs) but less understood in complex physical fitness exercises (PFEs). This study examined the task dependency of spontaneous rhythmic performance across three EBMs (walking, hopping, finger tapping) and seven PFEs (hip abduction, back extension, sit-up, push-up, shoulder abduction, squat, lunge). A total of 15 men and 15 women performed each task at a self-selected pace while wearing inertial sensors. Measures included spontaneous motor tempo (SMT), temporal structure metrics, and their within- and between-trial individual variability (%CV) (ANOVA, SPSS 28.0, p ≤ 0.05). SMT was task-dependent, with EMB tasks being near ~2 Hz (walking: 1.82 ± 0.10 Hz; hopping: 2.08 ± 0.22 Hz; finger tapping: 1.89 ± 0.43 Hz) and PFEs being slower (0.36–0.68 Hz). Temporal structure mirrored these differences with shorter cycle and phase durations in EBM than PFE tasks, with relative phase durations consistently at about a 1:1 ratio. Τhe overall low %CV indicated stable performance (within-trial: 1.4–7.5%; between-trial: 0.5–7.8%). The results highlight the task dependency of SMT and temporal structure, as well as the robustness of an overarching internal timing framework supporting rhythmic motor control across diverse movement contexts.
Keywords: spontaneous motor tempo; physical fitness exercises; temporal structure; performance stability; variability spontaneous motor tempo; physical fitness exercises; temporal structure; performance stability; variability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Emmanouil, A.; Paderi, F.; Boudolos, K.; Rousanoglou, E. The Task Dependency of Spontaneous Rhythmic Performance in Movements Beyond Established Biomechanical Models: An Inertial Sensor-Based Study. Sensors 2025, 25, 6565. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216565

AMA Style

Emmanouil A, Paderi F, Boudolos K, Rousanoglou E. The Task Dependency of Spontaneous Rhythmic Performance in Movements Beyond Established Biomechanical Models: An Inertial Sensor-Based Study. Sensors. 2025; 25(21):6565. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216565

Chicago/Turabian Style

Emmanouil, Analina, Fani Paderi, Konstantinos Boudolos, and Elissavet Rousanoglou. 2025. "The Task Dependency of Spontaneous Rhythmic Performance in Movements Beyond Established Biomechanical Models: An Inertial Sensor-Based Study" Sensors 25, no. 21: 6565. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216565

APA Style

Emmanouil, A., Paderi, F., Boudolos, K., & Rousanoglou, E. (2025). The Task Dependency of Spontaneous Rhythmic Performance in Movements Beyond Established Biomechanical Models: An Inertial Sensor-Based Study. Sensors, 25(21), 6565. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25216565

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop