AI-Enabled IoT for Food Computing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background Theory
2.1. Food and Food Computing
2.2. Technological Integration in Food Sector
2.2.1. AI in Food Sector
2.2.2. IoT Integration in Food Sector
2.3. Advanced Technologies for Food Processing
2.3.1. AI and IoT in Food Sector
2.3.2. Image Recognition and Computer Vision for Food Sector
2.3.3. Natural Language Processing for Recipe Analysis and Recommendation Systems
2.3.4. Food Recognition Through IoT and Mobile Applications
2.4. Data Security and Privacy in Food Computing
2.5. Industry Adoption and Challenges
3. State of the Art of AI in Food Computing
3.1. The Current Use of AI in the Food Sector
3.2. Challenges in Food Sector Using AI
3.2.1. Data Quality and Availability
3.2.2. Complexity of Food Attributes
3.2.3. Personalization and Cultural Differences
3.2.4. Ethical and Privacy Concerns
3.2.5. Environmental Impact
3.2.6. Regulatory Compliance
3.2.7. Integration with Existing Systems
3.2.8. Real-Time Processing Challenges
3.2.9. Scalability
3.2.10. Interdisciplinary Collaboration
3.2.11. Data Governance
3.2.12. Standardization and Interoperability of Data
3.3. The Role of Generative AI in Advancing Food Computing
3.3.1. Advancements in Generative AI for Food Data Processing and Personalization
3.3.2. Challenges in Implementing Generative AI in Food Systems
3.3.3. Enhancing Food Supply Chain Transparency with Blockchain and AI
4. Data Sources in Food Computing
4.1. Types of Data
- Images: In food computing, visual data are essential, particularly to applications like quality evaluation, calorie estimation, and food recognition [102]. Computer vision models are trained with high-resolution photographs of food products in order to effectively detect and classify various food categories. Publicly available datasets include the following:
- –
- Food-101: Frequently used for training image recognition models, it has 101,000 photos categorized into 101 distinct food types [103]. João Louro et al. used the Food-101 dataset to analyze food ingredient recognition by leveraging a CNN (ResNet-50) combined with fine-tuning and transfer learning techniques. Their approach aimed to enhance food identification accuracy while addressing the dataset’s limitations, such as the overrepresentation of Asian foods [104]. Prakhar Tripathi explored transfer learning in deep neural networks by using the Food-101 dataset to build a food classifier, emphasizing improved training efficiency and accuracy [105]. Ignazio Gallo et al. used the UPMC Food-101 variant to investigate multimodal classification by fusing image and text data through BERT and CNNs, achieving superior performance with an early fusion stacking approach [106].
- –
- UECFOOD-256: Absolutely ideal for food classification, this image collection includes pictures from 256 food categories, with a primary focus on Japanese food [107]. Berker Arslan et al. focused on food classification using the UECFood-256 dataset, where they explored various deep learning methods for fine-grained food recognition. Their work achieved a State-of-the-Art (SOA) accuracy of 90.02% on the UEC Food-100 database, which has been extended to the UECFood-256 dataset. They emphasized the use of ensemble methods, particularly combining ResNeXt and DenseNet models, and proposed the first averaged-trial comparison, setting a new benchmark for food classification [108]. Elena Battini Sönmez et al. addressed food detection by introducing the Segmented UEC Food-100 dataset, which includes segmentation masks. Although their primary focus was on UEC Food-100, the methods are applicable to the UECFood-256 dataset for multi-food item detection. They compared different segmentation approaches, achieving an mIoU of 64.63% with YOLAC and an mAP of 68.83% with YOLACT in instance segmentation, offering significant contributions to food detection and classification on these challenging datasets [109].
- –
- Food-5K: A dataset created for diet-tracking and smart kitchen applications that detects food in real-world settings [110]. Shuang Liang and Yu Gu proposed a multi-stage CNN framework for food recognition, incorporating innovative modules such as a boundary-aware module (BAM) for detecting boundary regions, deformable ROI pooling (DRP) for spatial feature refinement, and a transformer encoder for capturing global contextual relationships. Their framework achieved SOA performance with a Top-1 accuracy of 99.80% on the Food-5K dataset, significantly outperforming existing methods. This framework demonstrates great potential for applications in automated meal tracking and personalized nutrition planning, providing robust solutions for real-world dietary management [111].
- Nutritional information: Food product macronutrients (proteins, carbs, and fats), micronutrients (vitamins and minerals), and other dietary components are all included in nutritional data [112]. Personalized nutrition, health tracking, and diet planning applications all require this information to be developed. Publicly available datasets include the following:
- –
- The Yummly dataset helps with nutrition analysis and recommendation systems by offering thorough nutritional data for a wide variety of recipes [113]. Thomas Theodoridis et al. proposed a cross-modal variational framework for food image analysis, focusing on ingredient recognition. The framework processes information from both image and text modalities by using two variational encoder–decoder branches, while a variational mapper aligns the distributions of the branches. Experimental results on the Yummly-28K dataset demonstrated the framework’s superiority over similar methods, achieving better performance than current SOA approaches on the large-scale Recipe1M dataset [114]. Viswanath C. et al. applied an InceptionV3-based CNN model for food image classification. Their approach used convolution layers capable of generating their own kernels to convolve with the input layer, along with a Max-Pooling function for feature extraction. By combining multiple layers and concatenating the outputs, they achieved a notable accuracy of 92.89% on both the Yummly dataset and their own dataset, demonstrating the effectiveness of their CNN-based model in food recognition [115].
- –
- Recipe1M provides nutritional information in addition to its one million recipes, which is helpful for both dish suggestions and nutrition research [116]. RecipeGM by Anja Reusch et al. introduces a hierarchical recipe generation model using CNNN with self-attention mechanisms for generating recipes based on a given set of ingredients. This model outperforms RecipeGPT in some cases, and it addresses evaluation challenges in recipe generation [117]. FMI (Fine-grained Modalities Interaction for Cross-Modal Recipe Retrieval) by Fan Zhao et al. improves cross-modal recipe retrieval by leveraging a hierarchical recipe transformer, the CCMRE module for enhancing recipe components, and the TCVE module to enrich the visual encoder. Their approach outperforms the SOA on the Recipe1M dataset, with significant improvements in retrieval accuracy [118].
- Recipes: Ingredient lists, preparation techniques, cooking durations, and portion sizes are all included in recipe data. Recipe analysis facilitates dietary restriction modification, knowledge of culinary patterns, and the creation of meal suggestions [119].
- Food Logs: Food logs are records that track a person’s daily food consumption. These logs provide valuable insights into dietary choices, behaviors, and intake, which are essential to behavior analysis and health-related applications [120].
4.2. Data Collection Methods
- Crowdsourcing: Crowdsourcing is the process of collecting data from a big number of individuals, usually via internet sites. This method allows for the aggregation of diverse data types from a wide audience, which is particularly valuable in food computing applications, where varied perspectives and inputs are crucial. This approach works well for gathering a wide range of information, including recipe books, food logs, and user-submitted photos of food. Annotating data with crowdsourcing improves the quality and usefulness of datasets [121,122]. An ecosystem for food delivery that links food producers, consumers, and crowdsourced riders is depicted in the following diagram in Figure 12. Customers use a computer or smartphone to submit orders, which are subsequently accepted by food providers, to start the process. The crowdsourced riders are coordinated by the cloud-based system, which also makes order management easier. After logging in, riders are assigned delivery routes. By using shared motorbikes for transportation, this integrated approach guarantees effective food delivery from providers to clients.
- Sensors: Smart kitchen appliances, wearable technology, and smartphones all have sensors built in to gather data on food preparation and consumption in real time [123]. These sensors play a crucial role in food computing by providing precise, real-time data, enabling the dynamic and accurate monitoring of food-related activities. For instance, temperature sensors keep track of cooking conditions and can estimate portion amounts, while weight sensors can evaluate food safety and quality management [124].
- Internet of Things (IoT): Data on food can be continuously collected and transmitted through IoT devices [123]. The IoT represents a fundamental technological framework for enabling the seamless flow of information across various devices and systems, thereby enhancing the capabilities of food computing. For example, smart refrigerators may monitor stock levels and expiration dates, and kitchen equipment that is connected can give specific consumption trends. The IoT makes it possible to seamlessly integrate different data sources, which improves the accuracy and comprehensiveness of applications related to food computing [125].
5. The Convergence of AI and the IoT in the Food Sector
5.1. Supply Chain Optimization
5.2. Quality Control and Food Safety
5.3. Sustainable Practices
5.4. Predictive Maintenance of Equipment
5.5. Ethical Frameworks for Food Computing
6. Future Directions of AI and IoT in Food Computing
6.1. AI-Driven Predictive Analytics in Smart Agriculture
6.2. Blockchain-Enabled Food Safety and Traceability
6.3. Smart Appliances and Personalized Nutrition
6.4. Digital Twins in Food Production
6.5. Edge Computing for Real-Time Food Monitoring
7. Discussion
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Min, W.; Jiang, S.; Liu, L.; Rui, Y.; Jain, R. A Survey on Food Computing. ACM Comput. Surv. 2019, 52, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, P.; Rochell, V.; Plat, K.; Jaworski, A. Circular approaches in small-scale food production. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 2021, 1, 1231–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannerjee, G.; Sarkar, U.; Das, S.; Ghosh, I. Artificial intelligence in agriculture: A literature survey. Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Appl. Manag. Stud. 2018, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, F.L.; Zhao, M.Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.Y.; Li, X.J.; Wang, N.; Hu, B.W.; Xue, H.Y.; Zhao, M.; Tian, J.L. Research progress of electrospinning in food field: A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 158, 110474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muscolo, A.; Oliva, M.; Torello, G.; Russo, M. Oxidative stress: The role of antioxidant phytochemicals in the prevention and treatment of diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akujuobi, U.; Liu, S.; Besold, T.R. Revisiting named entity recognition in food computing: Enhancing performance and robustness. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 57, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramirez-Asis, E.; Vilchez-Carcamo, J.; Thakar, C.M.; Phasinam, K.; Kassanuk, T.; Naved, M. A review on role of artificial intelligence in food processing and manufacturing industry. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 51, 2462–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baciuliene, V.; Bilan, Y.; Navickas, V.; Civin, L. The aspects of artificial intelligence in different phases of the food value and supply chain. Foods 2023, 12, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esmaeily, R.; Razavi, M.A.; Razavi, S.H. A step forward in food science, technology and industry using artificial intelligence. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 143, 104286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, R.C.d.; Silva, R.D.d.S.e. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Benefits, Challenges, and Trends. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Class, L.C.; Kuhnen, G.; Rohn, S.; Kuballa, J. Diving deep into the data: A review of deep learning approaches and potential applications in foodomics. Foods 2021, 10, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marvin, H.J.P.; Bouzembrak, Y.; Van der Fels-Klerx, H.J.; Kempenaar, C.; Veerkamp, R.; Chauhan, A.; Stroosnijder, S.; Top, J.; Simsek-Senel, G.; Vrolijk, H.; et al. Digitalisation and Artificial Intelligence for sustainable food systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 344–348. [Google Scholar]
- Mantravadi, S.; Srai, J.S. How important are digital technologies for urban food security? A framework for supply chain integration using IoT. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023, 217, 1678–1687. [Google Scholar]
- Verdouw, C.; Sundmaeker, H.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Conzon, D.; Montanaro, T. Architecture framework of IoT-based food and farm systems: A multiple case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 165, 104939. [Google Scholar]
- Misra, N.N.; Dixit, Y.; Al-Mallahi, A.; Bhullar, M.; Upadhyay, R.; Martynenko, A. IoT, Big Data, and Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture and Food Industry. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 6305–6324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dakhia, Z.; Belouaar, H.; Belaiche, L.; Kahloul, L. Precision Unleashed: Enhancing Vital Sign Predictions Using Long-Short-Term Memory Networks. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT), Virtual, 20–21 November 2023; pp. 397–401. [Google Scholar]
- Savelyeva, N.K.; Semenova, A.A.; Popova, L.V.; Shabaltina, L.V. Smart technologies in agriculture as the basis of its innovative development: AI, ubiquitous computing, IoT, robotization, and blockchain. In Smart Innovation in Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 29–35. [Google Scholar]
- Sebti, M.R.; Carabetta, S.; Russo, M.; Merenda, M. Ochratoxin A Growth Probability Estimation in Wine Production Using AI-Powered IoT Devices. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Conference on AgriFood Electronics (CAFE), Torino, Italy, 25–27 September 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 152–156. [Google Scholar]
- Sebti, M.R.; Dakhia, Z.; Carabetta, S.; Di Sanzo, R.; Russo, M.; Merenda, M. Real-Time Classification of Ochratoxin A Contamination in Grapes Using AI-Enhanced IoT. Sensors 2025, 25, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Cao, Y.; Luo, Y.; Chen, G.; Vokkarane, V.; Ma, Y.; Chen, S.; Hou, P. A new deep learning-based food recognition system for dietary assessment on an edge computing service infrastructure. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2017, 11, 249–261. [Google Scholar]
- Vuppalapati, C.; Ilapakurti, A.; Kedari, S.; Vuppalapati, J.; Kedari, S.; Vuppalapati, R. Democratization of AI, Albeit Constrained IoT Devices & Tiny ML, for Creating a Sustainable Food Future. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT), Virtual, 20–21 December 2020; pp. 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Xiao, Z.; Deng, Z. High accuracy food image classification via vision transformer with data augmentation and feature augmentation. J. Food Eng. 2024, 365, 111833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, M.; Peng, Y. How visual aesthetics and calorie density predict food image popularity on instagram: A computer vision analysis. Health Commun. 2024, 39, 577–591. [Google Scholar]
- Nawoya, S.; Ssemakula, F.; Akol, R.; Geissmann, Q.; Karstoft, H.; Bjerge, K.; Mwikirize, C.; Katumba, A.; Gebreyesus, G. Computer vision and deep learning in insects for food and feed production: A review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 216, 108503. [Google Scholar]
- Starke, A.D.; Musto, C.; Rapp, A.; Semeraro, G.; Trattner, C. “Tell Me Why”: Using natural language justifications in a recipe recommender system to support healthier food choices. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 2024, 34, 407–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, A.; Mori, S.; Hashimoto, A.; Katsuragi, T.; Kawamura, T. Functional Food Knowledge Graph-based Recipe Recommendation System Focused on Lifestyle-Related Diseases. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 5–7 February 2024; pp. 261–268. [Google Scholar]
- Srikanth, N.; Sagar, K.; Sravanthi, C.; Saranya, K. Deep Learning Driven Food Recognition and Calorie Estimation Using Mobile Net Architecture. In Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), Belgaum, India, 22–24 May 2024; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Abiyev, R.; Adepoju, J. Automatic Food Recognition Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks with Self-attention Mechanism. Hum.-Centric Intell. Syst. 2024, 4, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertino, E. Data security and privacy: Concepts, approaches, and research directions. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 40th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), Atlanta, GA, USA, 10–14 June 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 400–407. [Google Scholar]
- Jolfaei, A.; Ostovari, P.; Alazab, M.; Gondal, I.; Kant, K. Guest Editorial Special Issue on Privacy and Security in Distributed Edge Computing and Evolving IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 2496–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stach, C.; Gritti, C.; Przytarski, D.; Mitschang, B. Trustworthy, secure, and privacy-aware food monitoring enabled by blockchains and the IoT. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), Austin, TX, USA, 23–27 March 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Abomhara, M.; Koien, G.M. Security and privacy in the Internet of Things: Current status and open issues. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Privacy and Security in Mobile Systems (PRISMS), Aalborg, Denmark, 11–14 May 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Roman, R.; Zhou, J.; Lopez, J. On the features and challenges of security and privacy in distributed Internet of Things. Comput. Networks 2013, 57, 2266–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwork, C.; Roth, A. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci. 2014, 9, 211–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentry, C. Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), Bethesda, MD, USA, 31 May–2 June 2009; pp. 169–178. [Google Scholar]
- Kamble, S.S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Parekh, H.; Joshi, S. Modeling the internet of things adoption barriers in food retail supply chains. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 48, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kakani, V.; Nguyen, V.H.; Kumar, B.P.; Kim, H.; Pasupuleti, V.R. A critical review on computer vision and artificial intelligence in food industry. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020, 2, 100033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dehghani, M.; Popova, A.; Gheitanchi, S. Factors Impacting Digital Transformations of the Food Industry by Adoption of Blockchain Technology. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2021. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanwar, S.; Parmar, A.; Kumari, A.; Jadav, N.K.; Hong, W.C.; Sharma, R. Blockchain adoption to secure the food industry: Opportunities and challenges. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manning, L.; Brewer, S.; Craigon, P.J.; Frey, J.; Gutierrez, A.; Jacobs, N.; Kanza, S.; Munday, S.; Sacks, J.; Pearson, S. Artificial intelligence and ethics within the food sector: Developing a common language for technology adoption across the supply chain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 125, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannor, R.K.; Arthur, K.K.; Oppong, D.; Oppong-Kyeremeh, H. A comprehensive systematic review and bibliometric analysis of food fraud from a global perspective. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100686. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Ibrahim, Z.; Khaskheli, M.B.; Raza, H.; Zhou, F.; Shamsi, I.H. Integrative approaches to abiotic stress management in crops: Combining bioinformatics educational tools and artificial intelligence applications. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barthwal, R.; Kathuria, D.; Joshi, S.; Kaler, R.S.S.; Singh, N. New trends in the development and application of artificial intelligence in food processing. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2024, 92, 103600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lugo-Morin, D.R. Artificial Intelligence on Food Vulnerability: Future Implications within a Framework of Opportunities and Challenges. Societies 2024, 14, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilal, N.U.; Al-Thelaya, K.; Al-Saeed, J.K.; Abdallah, M.; Schneider, J.; She, J.; Awan, J.H.; Agus, M. Evaluating machine learning technologies for food computing from a data set perspective. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 32041–32068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Forester, S.; Jennings-Dobbs, E.; Heber, D. Perspective: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Data Quality in Nutrient Databases. Adv. Nutr. 2023, 14, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Douglas, L.; van der Velden, R.; Dentener, M.; de Silva, W.; MacIvor, J.S.; Ranalli, M.A.; Bai, J.; Ceballos, G.; Kettle, A.J. Machine learning can guide food security efforts when primary data are not available. Nat. Food 2023, 1, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varzaru, A.A. Unveiling Digital Transformation: A Catalyst for Enhancing Food Security and Achieving Sustainable Development Goals at the European Union Level. Foods 2024, 13, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ufer, D.J.; Ortega, D.L. The complexity of food purchase motivations: Impacts of key priorities, knowledge, and information sources on active purchase of food labels. Food Qual. Prefer. 2023, 109, 104913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Kim, Y. The effect of food complexity on satiety. Appetite 2023, 156, 105234. [Google Scholar]
- Alexander, C.S.; Yarborough, M.; Smith, A. Who is responsible for ‘responsible AI’?: Navigating challenges to build trust in AI agriculture and food system technology. Precis. Agric. 2024, 25, 146–185. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, G.; Lin, X.; Chen, J.; Xu, N.; Xiong, P.; Li, H. Cultural inclusion and corporate sustainability: Evidence from food culture and corporate total factor productivity in China. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2023, 10, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michel, M.; Eldridge, A.L.; Hartmann, C.; Klassen, P.; Ingram, J.; Meijer, G.W. Benefits and challenges of food processing in the context of food systems, value chains and sustainable development goals. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 153, 104703. [Google Scholar]
- Dhirani, L.L.; Mukhtiar, N.; Chowdhry, B.S.; Newe, T. Ethical Dilemmas and Privacy Issues in Emerging Technologies: A Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Truong, V.T.; Le, L.B. Security for the Metaverse: Blockchain and Machine Learning techniques for intrusion detection. IEEE Netw. 2024, 38, 204–212. [Google Scholar]
- Uddin, M.; Chowdhury, A.; Kabir, M.A. Legal and ethical aspects of deploying artificial intelligence in climate-smart agriculture. AI Soc. 2024, 39, 221–234. [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, US Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Outlook and Review 2023. 2023. Available online: https://www.gibsondunn.com/us-cybersecurity-and-data-privacy-outlook-and-review-2023/ (accessed on 23 January 2024).
- Bidyalakshmi, T.; Jyoti, B.; Mansuri, S.M.; Srivastava, A.; Mohapatra, D.; Kalnar, Y.B.; Narsaiah, K.; Indore, N. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Food Processing: Current Status and Future Prospects. Food Eng. Rev. 2024, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodall, S.; Hollis, J.H. The difference between PC-based and immersive virtual reality food purchase environments on useability, presence, and physiological responses. Foods 2024, 13, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dilkes-Hoffman, L.S.; Lane, J.L.; Grant, T.; Pratt, S.; Lant, P.A.; Laycock, B. Environmental impact of biodegradable food packaging when considering food waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 325–334. [Google Scholar]
- Trebbin, A.; Geburt, K. Carbon and Environmental Labelling of Food Products: Insights into the Data on Display. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Bilali, H.; Ben Hassen, T. Regional agriculture and food systems amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of the near east and north Africa Region. Foods 2024, 13, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vilas-Boas, J.L.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.; Alberti, A.M. Convergence of Distributed Ledger Technologies with Digital Twins, IoT, and AI for fresh food logistics: Challenges and opportunities. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2023, 31, 100393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atapattu, A.J.; Perera, L.K.; Nuwarapaksha, T.D.; Udumann, S.S.; Dissanayaka, N.S. Challenges in Achieving Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. In Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Smart Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2024; pp. 7–34. [Google Scholar]
- CEPI and CITPA. Industry Guideline for the Compliance of Paper & Board Materials and Articles for Food Contact. 2012. Available online: https://www.citpa-europe.org/sites/default/files/Industry%20guideline-updated2012final.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2023).
- Kiviniemi, K.; Salmivaara, L.; Vainio, A.; Lundén, J. Food control strategies to support and enforce food business operators that repeatedly violate food safety legislation. Food Control 2025, 171, 111042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Shammakhi, B.N.S.; Ravikumar, A.; Meesaala, G.P.; Sharma, R.V. Exploring Prospects, Challenges and Pathways to Economic and Sustainable Growth: Perception of Omani Fishermen. Int. J. 2023, 10, 2243–2255. [Google Scholar]
- Khang, A.; Shah, V.; Rani, S. Handbook of Research on AI-Based Technologies and Applications in the Era of the Metaverse; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Charles, V.; Emrouznejad, A.; Gherman, T. A critical analysis of the integration of blockchain and artificial intelligence for supply chain. Ann. Oper. Res. 2023, 327, 7–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mesterhazy, A. What Is Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance and what are its food safety risks in wheat? Problems and solutions—A review. Toxins 2024, 16, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleh, H.M.; Marouane, H.; Fakhfakh, A. Stochastic gradient descent intrusion detection for wireless sensor network attack detection system using machine learning. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 3825–3836. [Google Scholar]
- Joshi, S.; Bisht, B.; Kumar, V.; Singh, N.; Pasha, S.B.J.; Singh, N.; Kumar, S. Artificial intelligence assisted food science and nutrition perspective for smart nutrition research and healthcare. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanufacturing 2024, 4, 86–101. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, N.; Solvang, W.D.; Yu, H. Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and Other Industry 4.0 Technologies in Spare Parts Warehousing in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Logistics 2024, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coluccia, B.; Agnusdei, G.P.; Miglietta, P.P.; Leo, F.D. Effects of COVID-19 on the Italian agri-food supply and value chains. Food Control 2021, 123, 107839. [Google Scholar]
- Iftikhar, A.; Ali, I.; Arslan, A.; Tarba, S. Digital innovation, data analytics, and supply chain resiliency: A bibliometric-based systematic literature review. Ann. Oper. Res. 2024, 333, 825–848. [Google Scholar]
- Mursanto, P.; Wibisono, A.; Fahira, P.K.; Rahmadhani, Z.P.; Wisesa, H.A. In-TFK: A scalable traditional food knowledge platform, a new traditional food dataset, platform, and multiprocess inference service. J. Big Data 2023, 10, 47. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, A.; Alston, L.; Needham, C.; Robinson, E.; Marshall, J.; Boelsen-Robinson, T.; Blake, M.; Huggins, C.; Peeters, A. Factors Influencing Implementation, Sustainability and Scalability of Healthy Food Retail Interventions: A Systematic Review of Reviews. Nutrients 2022, 14, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zedadra, O.; Seridi, H.; Jouandeau, N.; Fortino, G. An Energy-Aware Algorithm for Large Scale Foraging Systems. Scalable Comput. Pract. Exp. 2016, 16, 449–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, C.; Bouzembrak, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liang, Q.; van den Bulk, L.M.; Gavai, A.; Liu, N.; van den Heuvel, L.J.; Hoenderdaal, W.; Marvin, H.J.P. Big Data in food safety—A review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 36, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, A.; Kumar, R. Scalability Solutions in IoT for Smart Agriculture and Food Systems. Int. J. Food Eng. 2022, 10, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, M.; Isakhanyan, G.; Tekinerdogan, B. An interdisciplinary approach to artificial intelligence in agriculture. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2023, 25, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zohrabi, N.; Linkous, L.; Eini, R.; Adhikari, S.; Keegan, B.; Jones, J.C.; Gooden, B.; Verrelli, B.C.; Abdelwahed, S. Towards sustainable food security: An interdisciplinary approach. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/IOP/SCI), Atlanta, GA, USA, 18–21 August 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 463–470. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Zeng, A.; Wu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Li, S. Interdisciplinary Dynamics in COVID-19 Research: Examining the Role of Computer Science and Collaboration Patterns. Systems 2024, 12, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarvenpaa, S.L.; Essén, A. Data sustainability: Data governance in data infrastructures across technological and human generations. Inf. Organ. 2023, 33, 100449. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Deng, L.; Zhu, H.; Wang, W.; Ren, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Lu, S.; Sun, S.; Zhu, Z.; Gorriz, J.M.; et al. Deep learning in food category recognition. Inf. Fusion 2023, 98, 101859. [Google Scholar]
- Fleurence, R.L.; Kent, S.; Adamson, B.; Tcheng, J.; Balicer, R.; Ross, J.S.; Haynes, K.; Muller, P.; Campbell, J.; Bouée-Benhamiche, E.; et al. Assessing Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records for Health Technology Assessment: The SUITABILITY Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force. Value Health 2024, 27, 692–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Z.; Liang, F.; Hu, H. Blockchain-based and value-driven enterprise data governance: A collaborative framework. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goetz, K.E.; Reed, A.A.; Chiang, M.F.; Keane, T.; Tripathi, M.; Ng, E.; Nguyen, T.; Eydelman, M. Accelerating Care: A Roadmap to Interoperable Ophthalmic Imaging Standards in the United States. Ophthalmology 2023, 131, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krupitzer, C.; Stein, A. Unleashing the Potential of Digitalization in the Agri-Food Chain for Integrated Food Systems. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 15, 307–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.; Luo, S.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Shen, Y.; Wang, J. Illuminating the nanomaterials triggered signal amplification in electrochemiluminescence biosensors for food safety: Mechanism and future perspectives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 501, 215571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Zhang, M. Overcoming Data Interoperability Challenges in Food Supply Chains Using IoT and AI. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 12, 130–145. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P.; Hendriks, T.; Panoutsopoulos, H.; Brewster, C. Investigating FAIR data principles compliance in horizon 2020 funded Agri-food and rural development multi-actor projects. Agric. Syst. 2024, 214, 103822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krupitzer, C. Generative artificial intelligence in the agri-food value chain-overview, potential, and research challenges. Front. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 4, 1473357. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Sarayreh, M.; Reis, M.G.; Carr, A.; dos Reis, M.M. Inverse design and AI/deep generative networks in food design: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 138, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pugliese, N.; Ravaioli, F. Generative artificial intelligence in nutrition: A revolution in accessibility and personalization. J. Nutr. 2025, 155, 667–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhal, S.B.; Kar, D. Leveraging artificial intelligence and advanced food processing techniques for enhanced food safety, quality, and security: A comprehensive review. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, P.; Tsai, S.; He, Y.; Jia, X.; Zhen, D.; Yu, N.; Wang, Q.; Ahuja, J.K.C.; Wei, C.I. Large language models in food science: Innovations, applications, and future. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 148, 104488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sai, S.; Kumar, S.; Gaur, A.; Goyal, S.; Chamola, V.; Hussain, A. Unleashing the Power of Generative AI in Agriculture 4.0 for Smart and Sustainable Farming. Cogn. Comput. 2025, 17, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandan, A.; John, M.; Potdar, V. Achieving UN SDGs in food supply chain using blockchain technology. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menon, S.; Jain, K. Blockchain technology for transparency in agri-food supply chain: Use cases, limitations, and future directions. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2021, 71, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dedeoglu, V.; Malik, S.; Ramachandran, G.; Pal, S.; Jurdak, R. Blockchain meets edge-AI for food supply chain traceability and provenance. Compr. Anal. Chem. 2023, 101, 251–275. [Google Scholar]
- Pennington, J.A.T. Applications of food composition data: Data sources and considerations for use. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008, 21, S3–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bossard, L.; Guillaumin, M.; Van Gool, L. Food-101–Mining Discriminative Components with Random Forests. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV); Springer International Publishing: Zurich, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 446–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louro, J.; Fidalgo, F.; Oliveira, Á. Recognition of Food Ingredients Dataset Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 5448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, P. Transfer learning on deep neural network: A case study on food-101 food classifier. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2021, 5, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallo, I.; Ria, G.; Landro, N.; La Grassa, R. Image and text fusion for upmc food-101 using bert and cnns. In Proceedings of the 2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ), Wellington, New Zealand, 25–27 November 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuda, Y.; Yoshii, K.; Matsui, Y.; Kato, Y. UECFOOD-256: A Large-Scale Food Image Dataset for Food Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Food Image Recognition (FIR), Sapporo, Japan, 16 October 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–6. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/7830756/proceeding (accessed on 24 June 2024).
- Arslan, B.; Memiş, S.; Sönmez, E.B.; Batur, O.Z. Fine-grained food classification methods on the UEC food-100 database. IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell. 2021, 3, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sönmez, E.B.; Memiş, S.; Arslan, B.; Batur, O.Z. The segmented UEC Food-100 dataset with benchmark experiment on food detection. Multimed. Syst. 2023, 29, 2049–2057. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, T.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Xu, T. Food-5K: A Food Image Dataset for Food Recognition. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, ACM, Seattle, WA, USA, 12–16 October 2020; pp. 2361–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, S.; Gu, Y. Multi-stage convolutional neural network framework for food recognition with boundary-aware module and deformable ROI pooling. J. Food Recognit. 2024, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, J.; Ahmad, S.F.; Alyaemeni, A.; Ou, Y.; Irshad, M.; Alyafi-Alzahri, R.; Alsanie, G.; Unnisa, S.T. Role of perceived ease of use, usefulness, and financial strength on the adoption of health information systems: The moderating role of hospital size. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Chan, K.; Katrina, A.; Wong, H.; Julie, L.; Ma, W.; Liu, J. Yummly Dataset: A Food Recipe Dataset for Multi-Modal Learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Macau, China, 10–16 August 2019; IJCAI Organization: Montreal, ON, Canada, 2019; pp. 3991–3997. [Google Scholar]
- Theodoridis, T.; Solachidis, V.; Dimitropoulos, K.; Daras, P. A cross-modal variational framework for food image analysis. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 25–28 October 2020; pp. 3244–3248. [Google Scholar]
- Burkapalli, V.C.; Patil, P.C. An efficient food image classification by inception-V3 based CNNs. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, P.S. Recipe1M: A Dataset for Learning Cross-Modal Embeddings for Food Recipes and Food Images. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy, 22–29 October 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1239–1248. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/8234942/proceeding (accessed on 24 June 2024).
- Reusch, A.; Weber, A.; Thiele, M.; Lehner, W. RecipeGM: A hierarchical recipe generation model. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW), Chania, Greece, 19–22 April 2021; pp. 24–29. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, F.; Lu, Y.; Yao, Z.; Qu, F. Cross-modal recipe retrieval with fine-grained modal interaction. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chhikara, P.; Chaurasia, D.; Jiang, Y.; Masur, O.; Ilievski, F. Fire: Food image to recipe generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3–8 January 2024; pp. 8184–8194. [Google Scholar]
- Goodwin, B.K.; Rivieccio, G.; De Luca, G.; Capitanio, F. Computing impulse response functions from a copula-based vector autoregressive model: Evidence from the italian agri-food value chain. Qual. Quant. 2024, 58, 1779–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Marcantonio, F.; Nedelcu, B.R.; Padiu, B.; Rebedea, T.; Barreiro Hurle, J.; Ciaian, P. Food-Checker: A Mobile-Based Crowdsourcing Application for Dual Quality of Food; Joint Research Centre: Brussels, Belgium, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, Z.R.; Zhi, J.; Zeng, S.; Zhang, Z.; Kapoor, A.; Hudson, S.; Shen, H.; Fang, F. Predicting and Presenting Task Difficulty for Crowdsourcing Food Rescue Platforms. In Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference, Virtual, 13–17 May 2024; pp. 4686–4696. [Google Scholar]
- Morchid, A.; Alblushi, I.G.M.; Khalid, H.M.; El Alami, R.; Sitaramanan, S.R.; Muyeen, S.M. High-technology agriculture system to enhance food security: A concept of smart irrigation system using Internet of Things and cloud computing. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2024, in press. [Google Scholar]
- Thenkabail, P.S.; Teluguntla, P.G.; Oliphant, A.; Aneece, I.; Foley, D. Mapping the agricultural croplands of the world using Petabyte-scale big-data analytics from Landsat 30m satellite sensor data, multiple machine learning algorithms, and Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud computing. Big Data Learn. Anal. Appl. 2024, 13036, 130360C. [Google Scholar]
- Dhal, S.; Wyatt, B.M.; Mahanta, S.; Bhattarai, N.; Sharma, S.; Rout, T.; Saud, P.; Acharya, B.S. Internet of Things (IoT) in digital agriculture: An overview. Agron. J. 2024, 116, 1144–1163. [Google Scholar]
- Carotenuto, R.; Merenda, M.; Della Corte, F.G.; Iero, D. Online Black-Box Modeling for the IoT Digital Twins Through Machine Learning. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 48158–48168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Everloo, E.; Savion, O. Bytes to Bites Part One: Digitizing Consumption Insights. Leveraging AI in Food Product Development. AgFunder News, September 2023. Available online: https://agfundernews.com/bytes-to-bites-part-one-digitizing-consumption-insights-leveraging-ai-in-food-product-development (accessed on 15 May 2024).
- Sharma, A.; Podoplelova, E.; Shapovalov, G.; Tselykh, A.; Tselykh, A. Sustainable Smart Cities: Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H. Artificial intelligence in food safety: A decade review and bibliometric analysis. Foods 2023, 12, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Melendez, E.I.V.; Bergey, P.; Smith, B. Blockchain technology for supply chain provenance: Increasing supply chain efficiency and consumer trust. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2024, 29, 706–730. [Google Scholar]
- Naseem, S.; Rizwan, M. The role of artificial intelligence in advancing food safety: A strategic path to zero contamination. Food Control 2025, 175, 111292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, D.-I.D.; Orlowski, M. Emotional responses to narrative content: A comparative study on consumer food choice intentions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2024, 155, 108191. [Google Scholar]
- Bourechak, A.; Zedadra, O.; Kouahla, M.N.; Guerrieri, A.; Seridi, H.; Fortino, G. At the Confluence of Artificial Intelligence and Edge Computing in IoT-Based Applications: A Review and New Perspectives. Sensors 2022, 23, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaeddini, M.; Hajizadeh, M.; Reaidy, P. A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on the Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain in Smart Cities. ResearchGate 2023. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366949141_Bibliometric_Analysis_on_the_Convergence_of_Artificial_Intelligence_and_Blockchain (accessed on 16 April 2024).
- Sharma, A.; Sharma, A.; Tselykh, A.; Bozhenyuk, A.; Choudhury, T.; Alomar, M.A.; Sánchez-Chero, M. Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Oriented Sustainable Precision Farming: Towards Modern Agriculture. ResearchGate. 2022. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374770532_Artificial_intelligence_and_internet_of_things_oriented_sustainable_precision_farming_Towards_modern_agriculture (accessed on 24 June 2024).
- Armand, T.; Poupi, T.; Kim, H.-C.; Kim, J.-I. Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare: An Overview of the Applications of Digital Technologies in Diet Management. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales, R.; Martinez-Arroyo, A.; Aguilar, E. Robust Deep Neural Network for Learning in Noisy Multi-Label Food Images. Sensors 2024, 24, 2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ameller Pavez, J.; Drogue, S.; Baye, K.; Amiot, M.-J.; Kanerva, N.; Le Port, A.; Hoffman, M.; Lubowa, A.; Tumuhimbise, G.A.; Fogelholm, M.; et al. Evaluating Affordability of Healthier Diets in Four African Countries. Proceedings 2024, 91, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, F. AI for Predictive Maintenance in Industrial Systems; Cosmic Publications: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addanki, M.; Patra, P.; Kandra, P. Recent advances and applications of artificial intelligence and related technologies in the food industry. Appl. Food Res. 2022, 2, 100126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.; Khan, S.; Dsilva, J.; Centobelli, P. Blockchain integrated IOT for Food Supply Chain: A grey based Delphi-DEMATEL approach. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlZubi, A.A.; Kalda, G. Artificial intelligence and internet of things for sustainable farming and smart agriculture. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 78686–78692. [Google Scholar]
- Ryan, M.; van der Burg, S.; Bogaardt, M.-J. Identifying key ethical debates for autonomous robots in agri-food: A research agenda. AI Ethics 2022, 2, 493–507. [Google Scholar]
- Shahriari, K.; Shahriari, M. IEEE standard review—Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with artificial intelligence and autonomous systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC), Toronto, ON, Canada, 20–21 July 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 197–201. [Google Scholar]
- How, J.P. Ethically aligned design [From the Editor]. In IEEE Control Systems Magazine; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; Volume 38, pp. 3–4. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.; Johnson, S. GDPR Compliance in IoT-Enabled Food Services: A Case Study Approach. J. Data Priv. Secur. 2021, 8, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barr-Kumarakulasinghe, C.; Ng, B.-K. Protecting the unprotected consumer data in internet of things: Current scenario of data governance in Malaysia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, H.; Tian, J.; Yu, W.; Wilson, D.I.; Young, B.R.; Cui, X.; Xin, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, W. The application of artificial intelligence and big data in the food industry. Foods 2023, 12, 4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsang, Y.P.; Choy, K.L.; Wu, C.H.; Ho, G.T.S.; Lam, H.Y. Blockchain-driven IoT for food traceability with an integrated consensus mechanism. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 129000–129017. [Google Scholar]
- Aheleroff, S.; Xu, X.; Lu, Y.; Aristizabal, M.; Velásquez, J.P.; Joa, B.; Valencia, Y. IoT-enabled smart appliances under industry 4.0: A case study. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2020, 43, 101043. [Google Scholar]
- Kahalkar, K.; Vyas, U. AI for Personalized Nutrition and Healthcare Management. In Proceedings of the 2024 2nd DMIHER International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Education and Industry (IDICAIEI), Virtual, 29–30 November 2024; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Pylianidis, C.; Osinga, S.; Athanasiadis, I.N. Introducing digital twins to agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 184, 105942. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Cao, Z.; Dong, W. Overview of edge computing in the agricultural internet of things: Key technologies, applications, challenges. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 141748–141761. [Google Scholar]
- Elufioye, O.A.; Ike, C.U.; Odeyemi, O.; Usman, F.O.; Mhlongo, N.Z. AI-Driven predictive analytics in agricultural supply chains: A review: Assessing the benefits and challenges of AI in forecasting demand and optimizing supply in agriculture. Comput. Sci. Res. J. 2024, 5, 473–497. [Google Scholar]
- Mishra, H.; Mishra, D. AI for Data-Driven Decision-Making in Smart Agriculture: From Field to Farm Management. In Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Smart Agriculture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 173–193. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; He, Y.; Wu, Z. Design of a blockchain-enabled traceability system framework for food supply chains. Foods 2022, 11, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khanna, A.; Jain, S.; Burgio, A.; Bolshev, V.; Panchenko, V. Blockchain-enabled supply chain platform for Indian dairy industry: Safety and traceability. Foods 2022, 11, 2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bol, M.; Alam, F.; Bronlund, J. Modern technologies for personalized nutrition. Trends Pers. Nutr. 2019, 195–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santhuja, P.; Reddy, E.G.; Choudri, S.R.; Muthulekshmi, M.; Balaji, S. Intelligent Personalized Nutrition Guidance System Using IoT and Machine Learning Algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2023 Second International Conference on Smart Technologies for Smart Nation (SmartTechCon), Singapore, 18–19 August 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 250–254. [Google Scholar]
- Henrichs, E.; Noack, T.; Pinzon Piedrahita, A.M.; Salem, M.A.; Stolz, J.; Krupitzer, C. Can a byte improve our bite? An analysis of digital twins in the food industry. Sensors 2021, 22, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isuru, A.; Kelton, W.; Bayer, C. Digital twins in food processing: A conceptual approach to developing multi-layer digital models. Digit. Chem. Eng. 2023, 7, 100087. [Google Scholar]
- Gowrishankar, V.; Veena, P.; Ponmurugan, P.; Annapoorani, B.T.; Vijayakumar, P. Edge Computing Enabled Smart Warehouse Management System for Food Processing Industries. In Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Delhi, India, 6–8 July 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Der Yang, M.; Tseng, H.H.; Hsu, Y.C.; Tseng, W.C. Real-time crop classification using edge computing and deep learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 17th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Las Vegas, NA, USA, 10–13 January 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
Aspect | Food | Food Computing |
---|---|---|
Involves physical properties | ✓ | ✗ |
Uses computational methods | ✗ | ✓ |
Enhances food quality and safety | ✗ | ✓ |
Involves AI or IoT | ✗ | ✓ |
Focuses on nourishment | ✓ | ✗ |
Focuses on technology applications | ✗ | ✓ |
Research Area | Findings | Future Research Directions | Critical Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
Data quality and availability [44,45,46,47,48] | High-quality data for ML technologies in the food sector. Issues remain in data collection, sharing, and application. | Investigate data-sharing protocols and scalable solutions for real-time data collection across the food supply chain. | Existing studies lack emphasis on data quality in resource-constrained environments, limiting their global applicability. |
Complexity of food attributes [37,49,50] | Understanding the relationship between food complexity and consumer behavior. The complexity of food attributes affects AI algorithms. | Explore AI-driven models that integrate consumer behavior data to predict food preferences and health outcomes. | Current approaches fail to address the subjective nature of food complexity, which varies across cultural and demographic groups. |
Personalization and cultural differences [50,51,52] | Personalization and cultural differences present challenges for AI in the food sector. Understanding cross-cultural food preferences is essential to personalized food recommendations. | Conduct research on AI-based solutions for personalized nutrition across diverse cultural contexts. | Datasets used for personalization often lack representation from non-Western dietary habits, leading to biased models. |
Ethical and privacy concerns [51,53,54,55,56,57] | Ethical and privacy concerns pose challenges for AI adoption in the food sector. Regulation and oversight are needed to ensure responsible AI deployment. | Explore best practices for data anonymization in AI food systems, and investigate regulations like GDPR in international contexts. | Despite existing frameworks, enforcement of ethical practices and compliance with privacy laws is inconsistent, especially across borders. |
Environmental impact [58,59,60,61,62] | AI applications in food computing have the potential to reduce environmental impact. Challenges remain in minimizing energy consumption and waste production. | Research the development of energy-efficient algorithms and sustainable AI solutions for reducing food waste. | Most studies overlook the lifecycle emissions of AI systems, especially in large-scale industrial applications. |
Regulatory compliance [63,64,65,66,67] | Regulatory compliance for AI adoption in the food sector. Issues include aligning AI technologies with legal requirements and ensuring data security. | Investigate frameworks for cross-border regulatory compliance and standardization in AI-driven food systems. | Current research lacks actionable guidelines for navigating conflicting regulations across regions. |
Integration with existing systems [68,69,70,71,72] | Integration with existing systems for AI adoption in the food sector. Issues include interoperability and compatibility. | Study the integration of emerging AI technologies with legacy food systems and the role of the IoT in enhancing system interoperability. | Studies often fail to propose scalable solutions for integrating AI with legacy systems without major infrastructure overhauls. |
Real-time processing challenges [73,74,75] | Real-time processing ensures food safety and quality. Challenges include data latency and processing speed. | Explore the use of edge computing to enable faster, real-time data processing at the source of food production. | Current solutions for real-time processing often prioritize speed over accuracy, leading to trade-offs in decision quality. |
Scalability [1,76,77,78,79,80] | Scalability remains a challenge for AI solutions in food computing, particularly with the increasing volume and variety of data. Proposed solutions involve parallel computing, FL, and containerization of AI workloads. | Develop frameworks for scaling AI models across distributed networks in food systems, focusing on FL for privacy preservation. | Scalability challenges are compounded by the lack of robust frameworks for integrating heterogeneous datasets in food computing. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dakhia, Z.; Russo, M.; Merenda, M. AI-Enabled IoT for Food Computing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions. Sensors 2025, 25, 2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072147
Dakhia Z, Russo M, Merenda M. AI-Enabled IoT for Food Computing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions. Sensors. 2025; 25(7):2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072147
Chicago/Turabian StyleDakhia, Zohra, Mariateresa Russo, and Massimo Merenda. 2025. "AI-Enabled IoT for Food Computing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions" Sensors 25, no. 7: 2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072147
APA StyleDakhia, Z., Russo, M., & Merenda, M. (2025). AI-Enabled IoT for Food Computing: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions. Sensors, 25(7), 2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072147