Next Article in Journal
Two Antibody-Guided Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid-Polyethylenimine (LGA-PEI) Nanoparticle Delivery Systems for Therapeutic Nucleic Acids
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of LNK (SH2B3) in the Regulation of JAK-STAT Signalling in Haematopoiesis
Previous Article in Journal
Bacterial-Specific Aggregation and Killing of Immunomodulatory Host Defense Peptides
Previous Article in Special Issue
IRF2BP2 Mutation Is Associated with Increased STAT1 and STAT5 Activation in Two Family Members with Inflammatory Conditions and Lymphopenia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/ph14090840
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

JAK-STAT Pathway Regulation of Intestinal Permeability: Pathogenic Roles and Therapeutic Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

by
Hillmin Lei
,
Meli’sa S. Crawford
and
Declan F. McCole
*
Division of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(9), 840; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090840
Submission received: 26 July 2021 / Revised: 17 August 2021 / Accepted: 19 August 2021 / Published: 25 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Regulation of JAKs in Health and in Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The epithelial barrier forms the interface between luminal microbes and the host immune system and is the first site of exposure to many of the environmental factors that trigger disease activity in chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Disruption of the epithelial barrier, in the form of increased intestinal permeability, is a feature of IBD and other inflammatory diseases, including celiac disease and type 1 diabetes. Variants in genes that regulate or belong to the JAK-STAT signaling pathway are associated with IBD risk. Inhibitors of the JAK-STAT pathway are now effective therapeutic options in IBD. This review will discuss emerging evidence that JAK inhibitors can be used to improve defects in intestinal permeability and how this plays a key role in resolving intestinal inflammation.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract and primarily include Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Inflammation in CD predominantly occurs in the small intestine while UC is commonly associated with inflammation of the rectum and areas of the colon [1,2,3]. Being a transmural disease, the presence of granulomas, focal crypt architectural abnormalities, and mucin preservation at active sites are frequently seen in CD patients [4]. However, focal or diffuse basal plasmacytosis, widespread mucosal or crypt architectural distortion, and mucin depletion are commonly seen in UC patients [4,5,6]. Collectively, patients with IBD can present a multitude of symptoms including diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss and in severe cases, nutrient deficiency, and anemia [4]. Furthermore, patients with IBD are at risk of developing complications including intestinal obstruction and colorectal cancer that can result in hospitalization and subsequent surgical interventions [4]. Despite the abundance of therapeutic strategies for IBD, many patients fail to respond appropriately to the available treatments [1,3]. Moreover, the prevalence of IBD is consistently rising with approximately 7 million cases globally [7].
Inflammatory bowel diseases are multifactorial disorders that manifest from an abnormal immune response towards luminal contents in the digestive tract in processes driven by genetic and environmental risk factors [8,9]. Currently, over two hundred SNPs have been linked to the pathogenesis of IBD, many of which are involved in regulating intestinal epithelial barrier function [8]. Disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier, via increased intestinal permeability, is a feature of many chronic inflammatory disorders including IBD. However, it was uncertain whether the increased intestinal permeability found in patients with CD or UC is an associated finding or if it plays a significant role in disease pathogenesis [10].
Intriguingly, a prospective study by Turpin et al. demonstrated that increased intestinal permeability is associated with the later development of CD [11]. This finding has substantial implications in understanding the pathogenesis of IBD as it provides the most robust evidence of increased intestinal permeability predisposing to subsequent onset of CD. Variants in genes belonging to the Janus kinase (JAK)—signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway, as well as members of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family that act as negative regulators of JAK-STATs, are associated with increased IBD risk [8,9]. JAK-STAT proteins are responsible for mediating receptor signaling of numerous IBD-associated cytokines involved in regulating intestinal permeability [9]. With regulation of intestinal permeability being an essential component of proper intestinal epithelial barrier function, developing therapeutics to target signaling cascades such as the JAK-STAT pathway represent an attractive therapeutic avenue for patients with IBD.
Indeed, inhibitors of the JAK-STAT pathway have been an emerging therapeutic option in IBD (Table 1) [12]. Unlike biologic treatments for IBD such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, JAK inhibitors are small molecule drugs that have a brief plasma half-life, low risk of immunogenicity, and rapid onset of action [13]. Tofacitinib (XeljanzTM), the first of its class to be approved for the treatment of moderate and severe UC, demonstrated efficacy of remission in UC patients; however, it showed no significant efficacy in induction and maintenance of Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI; <150) vs. placebo in phase 2b clinical trials [14]. The differential effects of the broad spectrum JAK inhibitor tofacitinib vs. the selective JAK1 inhibitors in treating UC vs. CD respectively are noteworthy and may indicate a more selective role for JAK1 in the pathogenesis of CD. Treatment regimens for UC that utilize tofacitinib are primarily for patients that failed conventional therapies and/or lost responsiveness to other biologics [15]. However, drugs that inhibit the JAK-STAT pathway may impact other physiological processes thus requiring additional long-term studies regarding their safety profiles and mechanism of action [13]. Of note, tofacitinib was allocated a ‘boxed warning’ label by the FDA due to blood clotting events associated with the 10-mg, twice-daily dose of tofacitinib when administered to rheumatoid arthritis patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor and was associated with a risk of infections [16]. Therefore, understanding the role of the JAK-STAT pathway in regulating physiological processes such as maintenance of intestinal permeability is crucial for developing effective therapeutic agents to reinforce the intestinal epithelial barrier and intestinal homeostasis.
Here, we will review emerging evidence of the importance of JAK-STAT signaling in the regulation of intestinal permeability and associated pathologies, and how JAK inhibitors can be used to improve defects in intestinal permeability and resolve intestinal inflammation.

2. Intestinal Permeability in IBD

2.1. Intestinal Epithelial Barrier

The intestinal epithelial barrier is a single layer of epithelial cells that is essential for regulation of intestinal homeostasis and mediates communication between the intestinal microflora and the immune system [17,18]. In addition to being a dynamic interface between the luminal contents and the host immune system, the epithelium is the first site of exposure to many of the environmental factors that can trigger disease activity in chronic IBD [17,18]. With the epithelium neighboring the luminal microbes and the underlying immune system, the integrity of the epithelial lining is critical to avoid excessive contact of pathogenic antigens with lamina propria immune cells. Aside from serving as a physical barrier, intestinal epithelial cells can also endocytose bacteria, sequester and neutralize toxins, and detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [19]. Furthermore, the epithelium can respond to intestinal damage by secreting factors that contribute to epithelial restitution, initiating wound repair, and activating the underlying innate and adaptive immunity [18]. However, disruption of this selective barrier can lead to chronic intestinal inflammation through the uncontrolled uptake of foreign antigens and the overstimulation of the mucosal immune system [20]. Along with its innate immune functions, the intestinal epithelium can perform a variety of specialized tasks due to its ability to form a tightly regulated and selectively permeable barrier. This leaky barrier is essential for the epithelium to generate ion solute concentration gradients to appropriately absorb nutrients and water [18]. Moreover, a regulated intestinal barrier is required for controlled antigen transport to the resident immune cells in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue, thus supporting the maturation of the immune system [21]. Therefore, proper function of the intestinal epithelial barrier is essential for prevention of intraluminal pathogen invasion, regulated intake of essential nutrients, and managing the intestinal immune response.

2.2. Intestinal Permeability: Maintenance and Its Role in Inflammation

An impaired intestinal epithelial barrier, reflecting increased intestinal permeability, has been linked to several diseases including celiac disease, type 1 diabetes, and IBD. However, a clear connection between elevated underlying intestinal permeability and the onset of IBD had not been made until a recent prospective study of a cohort of asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with IBD reported that elevated intestinal permeability is significantly linked to the risk of developing CD [11]. Baseline measures of the urinary fractional excretion ratio of lactulose to mannitol (LMR) in subjects who later developed CD were significantly higher than asymptomatic individuals [11]. The manifestation of disease did not occur until several years after the initial identification of increased permeability thus suggesting that increased permeability was required, but by itself was not sufficient to cause disease [11]. In addition, a genome-wide association of LMR determined that host genetics provide a mild contribution to an elevated LMR [22]. Further investigations are needed to determine if the abnormality of the gut barrier is an intrinsic barrier defect, the result of a specific insult, or a reflection of the luminal environment [11]. These findings represent a major advance on earlier work that alluded to a primary role for increased permeability in the onset of IBD [23,24,25].
These clinical findings align with studies in animal models of IBD demonstrating that increased intestinal paracellular permeability precedes the onset of inflammation in the gut. The SAMP1/YitFc mouse model of chronic ileitis was described to have a permeability defect before the presence of ileal inflammation [26]. SAMP mice exhibited profound epithelial barrier alterations with reduced transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and elevated LMR [26]. Similarly, mdr1a−/− mice, lacking the multidrug resistance gene that encodes the p-glycoprotein transporter, presented with chronic inflammation of the gut when exposed to a “normal” microbiota [27]. A defect in mdr1a is likely to predispose the intestinal epithelium to bacterial invasion and infection [27]. Madsen et al., showed that increased intestinal permeability is evident before intestinal inflammation in Il10−/− mice [28]. Of interest, treatment of Il10−/− mice with the probiotic compound, VSL#3, results in the normalization of colonic epithelial barrier along with a reduction in levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and IFN-γ [28].
Mechanistically, alterations in expression of tight junction proteins have been reported to affect intestinal permeability and contribute to the pathogenesis of IBD. Mice with intestinal deletion of claudin-7 exhibited colonic inflammation even though tight junction structures were intact, suggesting differences in expression of certain tight junction proteins can increase or reduce intestinal paracellular permeability [29]. Similar effects were also seen in colonic tissues from patients with active CD. These patients showed impaired intestinal barrier function as indicated by a dramatic reduction in TEER [30]. Moreover, this drop in intestinal barrier function was associated with a decrease in tight junction strand number and continuity, in addition to an increase in epithelial apoptosis [30]. The size of the discontinuity of these tight junction strand breaks were considered large enough to facilitate paracellular passage of foreign antigens [30]. Expression of the barrier sealing tight junction proteins, occluding, and claudins -3, -5, and -8, were also dramatically decreased in patients with active CD while increased expression of the pore-forming claudin-2 was upregulated [30].
Consistent with the clinical findings of Turpin et al., animal studies also indicate that increased intestinal paracellular permeability by itself is insufficient to cause colitis [11]. Su et al., demonstrated that constitutively-active myosin light chain kinase transgenic mice had significant barrier loss but grew similarly to their gender-matched littermates and did not develop intestinal inflammation [31]. However, when colitis was induced in these mice, they suffered from more severe inflammation and had significantly shorter survival times [31]. Furthermore, junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A) deficient mice had normal intestinal epithelial architecture in their colonic mucosa despite the increased presence of lymphoid aggregates and reduced intestinal barrier function [32]. Intriguingly, these JAM-A deficient mice were more sensitive to dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis [32,33]. Overall, these studies support the emerging hypothesis that an impaired barrier defect along with a trigger of an inappropriate immune response is critical for intestinal inflammation. Nevertheless, maintaining intestinal barrier function via regulating tight junction proteins is necessary for preventing intestinal inflammation (Figure 1) and developing therapeutics that target their regulators may be a viable clinical approach in patients with IBD.

3. Protection of the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier

The intestinal epithelial barrier consists of multiple elements that contribute to its function as a physical, chemical, and immunological defense. While the mucus layer, intestinal epithelium, and the underlying immune cells in the lamina propria comprise a major component of the defense response, intestinal epithelial permeability is regulated by tight junctions. In the following section, we will discuss the role and mechanisms of tight junctions as a selectively permeable barrier, and the significance of the JAK-STAT pathway in barrier permeability.

4. Pore Pathway: Electrolyte Flux

Claudins

Permeability through the tight junction barrier consists of two functionally distinct events that can be distinguished both functionally and on a molecular level from “unrestricted” permeability arising from cell death [34,35]. First, there is the high-capacity, charge-selective, and size-selective pore pathway that is predominantly regulated by the expression of claudin proteins, which permits the passage of small ions and uncharged molecules (Figure 2) [17,20,36,37]. Claudins are a large family (>24 members) of transmembrane proteins that are essential for managing paracellular transport of ions and solutes.
Dysregulation of claudins has been associated with an increase in epithelial barrier permeability and the development of IBD. As previously discussed, patients with active CD show reduced expression of the barrier-sealing claudins, -3, -5 and -8 while having increased expression of the pore-forming claudin-2 [30]. Similarly, in another cohort of patients with IBD, expression of claudin-2 was also upregulated whereas the expression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 were noticeably decreased [38]. Li et al., demonstrated a critical role of the dynamin-dependent endocytosis of claudin-3 and claudin-4 under nutrient stress in IECs [39]. These changes combine to accentuate tight junction permeability to cations and water thereby contributing to diarrhea, one of the major clinical symptoms of IBD [40].
Interestingly, IBD-associated pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-22 and IFN-γ have been reported to activate the JAK-STAT pathway to modify expression of claudin proteins [9,35,41,42,43,44]. Elevated claudin-2 expression in IL-6 treated Caco-2 monolayers is negated with the addition of STAT3 siRNA [35]. Two potent inhibitors of JAKs, JAK inhibitor I and AZD1480, reversed the upregulation of CLDN2 transcription and claudin-2 protein by abrogating the phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT3 in IL-22 treated Caco-2 monolayers [41]. Tofacitinib, a pan-JAK inhibitor that is FDA-approved to treat moderate to severe UC, is able to restrict IFN-γ-induced claudin-2 promoter activity and the increase in claudin-2 protein levels in T84 IECs by significantly reducing activation of JAK1-STAT1/3 signaling [9]. The induction of claudin-2 by IFN-γ has also been shown to be mediated by STAT1 activation and binding to the CLDN2 promoter for transcriptional expression [44]. This regulatory pathway was accentuated by knockdown of PTPN2 in vitro and in mouse intestinal epithelium in vivo [44,45]. PTPN2 is a key negative regulator of the JAK-STAT pathway and a loss-of-function variants in this gene increase the risk of IBD onset [46,47,48,49]. Importantly, the decreased TEER arising from PTPN2 knockdown in vitro was reversed by transfection with claudin-2 siRNA thus identifying a critical role for this negative regulator of JAK-STAT signaling in regulating claudin-2 transcriptional regulation [44,45]. A second mechanism of PTPN2 regulation of claudin-2 was also identified in which loss of PTPN2 reduced expression of the serine protease, matriptase (ST14) [50]. Matriptase mediates removal of claudin-2 from tight junctions and St14 hypomorphic mice exhibit increased claudin-2 expression and reduced TEER [50].

5. Leak Pathway: Molecular Mediators

5.1. Zonula Occludens

The tight junction-mediated low-capacity leak pathway allows the paracellular passage of larger ions and molecules (<100 Å) regardless of charge (Figure 3) [20]. The conglomeration of proteins that generally mediate the leak pathway include zonula occludens (ZO), occludin, tricellulin, and JAM-A. ZO is a PSD95-DLG1-ZO-1 homology domain (PDZ)-containing intracellular plaque protein involved in forming a scaffold between transmembrane proteins and the actin cytoskeleton [51,52]. At the tight junction, ZO-1, -2, and -3 contain PDZ domains that facilitate clustering and anchoring of tight junction proteins including occludin, claudins, and JAM-A to the cytoplasm [53,54,55].
In CD patients, ZO-1, which is normally found in the apical portion of IECs at tight junctions, was relocated to the basolateral side and were also found in the lamina propria extracellular matrix [56]. Intriguingly, the cytoskeletal architecture, represented by F-actin, was maintained, further supporting the notion that inappropriate localization of tight junction proteins may contribute to increased intestinal permeability seen in patients with IBD [56]. Gassler et al., demonstrated that expression of ZO-1, but not ZO-2, was downregulated in inflamed mucosal tissue of active IBD patients, suggesting both specific and broad functions of ZOs in the establishment of the tight junction network in a normal and inflamed mucosa [57]. Reduced expression of ZO-1 was also frequently seen in patients with active CD and UC, while alterations in ZO-1 function and location are likely mediated by cytokines released during intestinal inflammation [58].
Similar to the claudin proteins, the JAK-STAT signaling pathway is also involved in the regulation of ZO-1. Knockdown of PTPN2 in human Caco-2BBe IECs induced the internalization of ZO-1 and formation of gaps between adjacent IECs [8]. Loss of Ptpn2 in macrophages of mice caused a reduced and more diffuse staining of ZO-1 in the colonic epithelium, demonstrating a major role of these immune cells in regulating intestinal barrier function [8]. Of interest, these effects were nullified with the addition of tofacitinib [8]. Correspondingly, tofacitinib was able to prevent the relocalization of ZO-1 and minimize the number of intercellular junctional gaps in IFN-γ-treated T84 IECs [9]. In human colonic organoids, tofacitinib also reversed the IFN-γ-induced increase in 4-kilodalton fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (FD4) influx, a measurement of macromolecular paracellular permeability [9].

5.2. Occludin

Occludin is an integral transmembrane protein that is involved in organizing and stabilizing tight junctions and was the first identified component of the tight junction strand [59,60]. Downregulation and redistribution of the levels of occludin from tight junctions have been frequently reported in UC and CD [30,61,62]. Occludin has also been shown to be regulated in a JAK-STAT dependent manner. Moreover, occludin expression in IFN-γ-treated T84 cell monolayers was not significantly altered although intercellular gaps in membrane localization of ZO-1—in the apical membrane region as indicated by confocal z-stack imaging of apical occluding—was observed [9]. While tofacitinib was able to reduce the number of these gaps, further investigations are needed to determine the role of occludin in these events [9]. Interestingly, decreased expression of occludin in cultured PTPN2-deficient IECs and in proximal colon IECs from Ptpn2-LysMCre mice was rescued with tofacitinib [8]. The correction of occludin levels by tofacitinib was associated with normalization of paracellular permeability [8]. Moreover, a recent study from our lab demonstrated that loss of Ptpn2 in mice in vivo disrupted tight junction localization of occludin and ZO-1 in colonic epithelium [45]. Further studies are required to determine which cytokines regulate occludin expression and localization in the gut mucosa.

5.3. Tricellulin

Tricellulin is a tight junction protein that forms a barrier against macromolecules and solutes in bicellular and tricellular tight junctions [63]. Krug et al., demonstrated that tricellulin expression was reduced in the sigmoid colon of patients with UC and likely contributes to the enhanced permeability of macromolecules [64]. These findings were confirmed in a study showing that lower expression of tricellulin and the associated defects were reversed during ulcerative colitis remission [65].
Notably, downregulation of tricellulin in UC was shown to be driven by the UC-associated cytokine IL-13 through IL-13 receptor α2 [66]. IL-13-induced suppression of tricellulin in the intestinal epithelial cell line HT-29/B6 resulted in increased FD4 permeability [66]. Interestingly, inhibitors targeting JAK1 or JAK2 prevented the reduction in tricellulin levels by IL-13 [66]. In contrast, expression of tricellulin was unaltered in IFN-γ-treated-human colonic organoids or T84 monolayers [9]. Reduction of tricellulin levels was also seen when control Caco-2BBe cells were co-cultured with PTPN2-deficient macrophages, and this was rescued by incubation with anti-IL6 antibody, thus confirming a role for immune cell secreted IL-6 in causing decreased tricellulin expression in neighboring IECs [8,35]. Tofacitinib treatment of control Caco-2BBe cells, but not PTPN2-deficient IECs, rescued the reduction in tricellulin expression [8].
In a recent study, localization of tricellulin was found to be shifted predominantly from intestinal crypts to the surface epithelium in CD patients [66]. A key regulator of tricellulin localization, angulin-1, was also discovered to be downregulated in active CD [67]. Intriguingly, leptin, a hormone that is primarily produced by adipose tissue to regulate appetite and food storage, is able to downregulate angulin-1 levels in T84 and Caco-2 cell lines [67]. Adipose tissue is commonly seen adjacent to the inflamed intestinal segments in CD and could be a potential source of leptin [68]. Caco-2 cells treated with leptin exhibited increased intestinal permeability as demonstrated by elevated FD4 flux [67]. These effects were negated by pre-treatment with inhibitors of STAT3, Stattic and WP1006, and partially by the JAK2 inhibitor AG490 [67]. These findings reveal leptin as a novel target for the development of JAK-STAT inhibitors to alleviate defects in the intestinal barrier.

5.4. JAM-A

JAM-A is another PDZ domain-containing integral membrane protein that is selectively concentrated at intercellular junctions of epithelial cells [69]. Kucharzik et al., reported that JAM-A expression was decreased in the inflamed mucosa of patients with active IBD [70]. This finding was confirmed in a later study showing that normal colonic mucosa expressed abundant epithelial JAM-A; however, in the mucosa of both UC and CD its expression was reduced extensively in inflamed tissue [33].
Intriguingly, Fan et al., reported that the cytoplasmic tail of JAM-A is tyrosine phosphorylated (p-Y280) in association with impaired intestinal barrier function [71]. Exposure of human IECs to pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-22, or IL-17A resulted in increased JAM-A p-Y280 [71]. Furthermore, IL-17A enhanced transepithelial flux of FD4; however, there was only a mild reduction in TEER [71]. The regulation of this tyrosine phosphorylation was associated with the Src kinase, YES-1, and the phosphatase, PTPN13, suggesting the barrier sealing function of JAM-A is dependent on tyrosine kinase and phosphatase activity [71].
Along with the above findings, the JAK-STAT pathway has been identified to be a regulator of JAM-A. PTPN2-deficient IECs co-cultured with PTPN2-deficient macrophages have significantly reduced expression of JAM-A; however, tofacitinib was unable to restore the levels of JAM-A [8,35]. In contrast, JAM-A levels were corrected by tofacitinib treatment in proximal colon IECs from Ptpn2LysMCre mice [8]. Collectively, these studies indicate that JAM-A regulation is altered under inflammatory conditions and contributes to the increased permeability seen in IBD patients. Table 2 summarizes the regulation of tight junction proteins via the JAK-STAT pathway.

6. JAK-STAT Signaling in Apoptosis and Necroptosis of Intestinal Epithelial Cells

Along with its vital role in regulating intestinal permeability via tight junction proteins, epithelial barrier function can be altered via the “unrestricted pathway”, which is primarily associated with cell loss due to death or shedding [72]. This can also be modulated by JAK-STATs as JAK-STAT signaling can mediate different forms of cell death, apoptosis, and necroptosis in IECs. Deletion of Stat1 in mouse ileal IECs protected against IFN-λ-induced necroptosis and apoptosis in Paneth cells [73]. When treated with tofacitinib, IFN-λ-treated small intestinal organoids had lower gene transcription of the cell death mediators, Mlkl and Caspase-8 [73]. Notably, the addition of tofacitinib restored the viability of the organoids and prevented Paneth cell death in response to IFN-λ [73]. Filgotinib, a novel selective JAK1 inhibitor, showed similar effects and interfered with STAT1 phosphorylation [73].
In a related study, deletion of Stat1 in mouse ileal IECs lacking Caspase-8 partially recovered Paneth cell numbers and was associated with reduced Mlkl expression and a lower number of TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotide transferase dUTP nick end labeling) positive cells [74]. In contrast, Paneth cell function did not return to normal levels, indicating an alternative mechanism that regulates Paneth cell activity [74]. Surprisingly, Stat1 was demonstrated to be unessential in regulating cell death in the colon when inflammation was induced with DSS [74].
Of interest, an increase of reserve stem cells was observed after treatment of enteroids and mice with TNF-α and IFN-γ, suggesting cytokines released during mucosal inflammation are required for the regenerative response [75]. Notably, the JAK-STAT1 pathway was found to be necessary for activation of reserve stem cells during inflammation as pre-treatment of enteroid cultures with tofacitinib prevented the IFN-γ-induced increase in reserve stem cell number [75]. These findings demonstrate an alternative role of the JAK-STAT pathway in facilitating the restitution of the epithelial barrier.

7. Conclusions

In summary, the intestinal epithelial barrier is the first site of exposure to many environmental agents that can trigger disease manifestation in chronic IBD. Alterations in the epithelial barrier that increase intestinal permeability are a key feature of chronic inflammatory disorders including celiac disease, type 1 diabetes, and IBD. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of IBD by mediating cytokine-induced changes in intestinal paracellular permeability through regulating tight junction protein expression and localization. Additionally, the JAK-STAT signaling pathway can alter epithelial barrier function by regulating cell death in the intestinal epithelium. Moreover, the JAK-STAT signaling pathway is involved in processes related to immune system regulation and cellular development.
Currently, inhibitors of the JAK-STAT pathway represent a promising therapeutic option for the treatment for IBD; however, these compounds have potential risks including non-specificity, toxicity, and efficacy. While much of the focus of JAK inhibitors such as tofacitinib has centered on their effects on immune cells, emerging evidence shows that they can directly affect epithelial cell pathways regulating tight junction proteins. Furthermore, there are many therapeutic strategies that target inflammatory pathways associated with IBD, yet there are no current treatments for restoring the intestinal barrier. Thus, further understanding of the direct influence(s) of the JAK-STAT pathway on tight junction proteins and their upstream regulators are warranted. Specific inhibition of downstream targets of the JAK-STAT pathway may present an attractive strategy to develop novel and effective therapeutics focused on barrier regulation. Such investigations will be critical to better understand the scope of current and emerging JAK inhibitors to modulate cell types and pathways capable of modulating intestinal permeability and generate further insight into the clinical benefit of this class of agents.

Author Contributions

H.L. and D.F.M. conceived the manuscript. H.L., M.S.C. and D.F.M. wrote and edited the manuscript. D.F.M. supervised and revised the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by the National Institutes of Health (2R01DK091281 and 1R01AI153314 to DFM).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

DFM currently holds an investigator-initiated research award from Pfizer Inc., the makers of tofacitinib. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lichtenstein, G.R.; Loftus, E.; Isaacs, K.L.; Regueiro, M.D.; Gerson, L.B.; Sands, B.E. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn’s Disease in Adults. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 113, 481–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Torres, J.; Bonovas, S.; Doherty, G.; Kucharzik, T.; Gisbert, J.P.; Raine, T.; Adamina, M.; Armuzzi, A.; Bachmann, O.; Bager, P.; et al. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Crohn’s Disease: Medical Treatment. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2019, 14, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rubin, D.T.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Siegel, C.A.; Sauer, B.G.; Long, M.D. ACG Clinical Guideline: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 114, 384–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Maaser, C.; Sturm, A.; Vavricka, S.R.; Kucharzik, T.; Fiorino, G.; Annese, V.; Calabrese, E.; Baumgart, D.C.; Bettenworth, D.; Borralho Nunes, P.; et al. ECCO-ESGAR guideline for diagnostic assessment in IBD part 1: Initial diagnosis, monitoring of known IBD, detection of complications. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2019, 13, 144–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Langner, C.; Magro, F.; Driessen, A.; Ensari, A.; Mantzaris, G.J.; Villanacci, V.; Becheanu, G.; Nunes, P.B.; Cathomas, G.; Fries, W.; et al. The histopathological approach to inflammatory bowel disease: A practice guide. Virchows Arch. 2014, 464, 511–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Magro, F.; Langner, C.; Driessen, A.; Ensari, A.; Geboes, K.; Mantzaris, G.; Villanacci, V.; Becheanu, G.; Nunes, P.B.; Cathomas, G.; et al. European consensus on the histopathology of inflammatory bowel disease. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2013, 7, 827–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Alatab, S.; Sepanlou, S.G.; Ikuta, K.; Vahedi, H.; Bisignano, C.; Safiri, S.; Sadeghi, A.; Nixon, M.R.; Abdoli, A.; Abolhassani, H.; et al. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Spalinger, M.R.; Sayoc-Becerra, A.; Ordookhanian, C.; Canale, V.; Santos, A.N.; King, S.J.; Krishnan, M.; Nair, M.G.; Scharl, M.; McCole, D.F. The JAK Inhibitor Tofacitinib Rescues Intestinal Barrier Defects Caused by Disrupted Epithelial-macrophage Interactions. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2021, 15, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sayoc-Becerra, A.; Krishnan, M.; Fan, S.; Jimenez, J.; Hernandez, R.; Gibson, K.; Preciado, R.; Butt, G.; McCole, D.F. The JAK-Inhibitor Tofacitinib Rescues Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Colonoids from Cytokine-Induced Barrier Dysfunction. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2020, 26, 407–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Michielan, A.; D’Incà, R. Intestinal Permeability in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathogenesis, Clinical Evaluation, and Therapy of Leaky Gut. Mediat. Inflamm. 2015, 2015, 628157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Turpin, W.; Lee, S.H.; Raygoza Garay, J.A.; Madsen, K.L.; Meddings, J.B.; Bedrani, L.; Power, N.; Espin-Garcia, O.; Xu, W.; Smith, M.I.; et al. Increased Intestinal Permeability Is Associated with Later Development of Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 2092–2100.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rogler, G. Efficacy of JAK inhibitors in Crohn’s Disease. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2019, 14 (Suppl. S2), S746–S754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Perez, T.; Tyler, C.J.; Boyer, J.D.; Karuppuchamy, T.; Yarur, A.; Giles, D.A.; Yeasmin, S.; Lundborg, L.; Sandborn, W.J.; Patel, D.R.; et al. Targeting Cytokine Signaling and Lymphocyte Traffic via Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: JAK Inhibitors and S1PR Agonists. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Panés, J.; Sandborn, W.J.; Schreiber, S.; Sands, B.E.; Vermeire, S.; D’Haens, G.; Panaccione, R.; Higgins, P.D.R.; Colombel, J.-F.; Feagan, B.G.; et al. Tofacitinib for induction and maintenance therapy of Crohn’s disease: Results of two phase IIb randomised placebo-controlled trials. Gut 2017, 66, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. D’Amico, F.; Parigi, T.L.; Fiorino, G.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Danese, S. Tofacitinib in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: Efficacy and safety from clinical trials to real-world experience. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2019, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nash, P.; Kerschbaumer, A.; Dörner, T.; Dougados, M.; Fleischmann, R.M.; Geissler, K.; McInnes, I.; E Pope, J.; Van Der Heijde, D.; Stoffer-Marx, M.; et al. Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: A consensus statement. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021, 80, 71–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Odenwald, M.A.; Turner, J.R. The intestinal epithelial barrier: A therapeutic target? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chelakkot, C.; Ghim, J.; Ryu, S.H. Mechanisms regulating intestinal barrier integrity and its pathological implications. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Neal, M.D.; Leaphart, C.; Levy, R.; Prince, J.; Billiar, T.R.; Watkins, S.; Li, J.; Cetin, S.; Ford, H.; Schreiber, A.; et al. Enterocyte TLR4 Mediates Phagocytosis and Translocation of Bacteria Across the Intestinal Barrier. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 3070–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. McCole, D.F. IBD Candidate Genes and Intestinal Barrier Regulation. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 1829–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Martini, E.; Krug, S.; Siegmund, B.; Neurath, M.F.; Becker, C. Mend Your Fences. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 4, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Turpin, W.; Espin-Garcia, O.; Bedrani, L.; Madsen, K.; Meddings, J.B.; Garay, J.A.R.; Silverberg, M.S.; Smith, M.I.; Griffiths, A.M.; Moayyedi, P.; et al. Analysis of Genetic Association of Intestinal Permeability in Healthy First-degree Relatives of Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2019, 25, 1796–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hollander, D.; Vadheim, C.M.; Brettholz, E.; Peterson, G.M.; Delahunty, T.; Rotter, J. Increased Intestinal Permeability m Patients with Crohn’ s Disease and Their Relatives. Ann. Intern. Med. 1986, 105, 883–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. May, G.R.; Sutherland, L.R.; Meddings, J.B. Is small intestinal permeability really increased in relatives of patients with Crohn’s disease? Gastroenterology 1993, 104, 1627–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Irvine, E.; Marshall, J. Increased intestinal permeability precedes the onset of Crohn’s disease in a subject with familial risk. Gastroenterology 2000, 119, 1740–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Olson, T.S.; Reuter, B.K.; Scott, K.G.-E.; Morris, M.A.; Wang, X.-M.; Hancock, L.N.; Burcin, T.L.; Cohn, S.M.; Ernst, P.; Cominelli, F.; et al. The primary defect in experimental ileitis originates from a nonhematopoietic source. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Resta-Lenert, S.; Smitham, J.; Barrett, K.E. Epithelial dysfunction associated with the development of colitis in conventionally housed mdr1a−/− mice. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2005, 289, G153–G162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Madsen, K.; Cornish, A.; Soper, P.; McKaigney, C.; Jijon, H.; Yachimec, C.; Doyle, J.; Jewell, L.; De Simone, C. Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology 2001, 121, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tanaka, H.; Takechi, M.; Kiyonari, H.; Shioi, G.; Tamura, A.; Tsukita, S. Intestinal deletion of Claudin-7 enhances paracellular organic solute flux and initiates colonic inflammation in mice. Gut 2015, 64, 1529–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Zeissig, S.; Bürgel, N.; Günzel, D.; Richter, J.; Mankertz, J.; Wahnschaffe, U.; Kroesen, A.J.; Zeitz, M.; Fromm, M.; Schulzke, J.D. Changes in expression and distribution of claudin 2, 5 and 8 lead to discontinuous tight junctions and barrier dysfunction in active Crohn’s disease. Gut 2007, 56, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Su, L.; Shen, L.; Clayburgh, D.; Nalle, S.C.; Sullivan, E.A.; Meddings, J.B.; Abraham, C.; Turner, J.R. Targeted Epithelial Tight Junction Dysfunction Causes Immune Activation and Contributes to Development of Experimental Colitis. Gastroenterology 2009, 136, 551–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Laukoetter, M.G.; Nava, P.; Lee, W.Y.; Severson, E.A.; Capaldo, C.T.; Babbin, B.A.; Williams, I.R.; Koval, M.; Peatman, E.; Campbell, J.A.; et al. JAM-A regulates permeability and inflammation in the intestine in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 3067–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vetrano, S.; Rescigno, M.; Cera, M.R.; Correale, C.; Rumio, C.; Doni, A.; Fantini, M.; Sturm, A.; Borroni, E.; Repici, A.; et al. Unique Role of Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A in Maintaining Mucosal Homeostasis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tsai, P.-Y.; Zhang, B.; He, W.; Zha, J.-M.; Odenwald, M.A.; Singh, G.; Tamura, A.; Shen, L.; Sailer, A.; Yeruva, S.; et al. IL-22 Upregulates Epithelial Claudin-2 to Drive Diarrhea and Enteric Pathogen Clearance. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 671–681.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Spalinger, M.R.; Sayoc-Becerra, A.; Santos, A.N.; Shawki, A.; Canale, V.; Krishnan, M.; Niechcial, A.; Obialo, N.; Scharl, M.; Li, J.; et al. PTPN2 Regulates Interactions Between Macrophages and Intestinal Epithelial Cells to Promote Intestinal Barrier Function. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 1763–1777.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lameris, A.L.; Huybers, S.; Kaukinen, K.; Mäkelä, T.H.; Bindels, R.J.; Hoenderop, J.G.; Nevalainen, P.I. Expression profiling of claudins in the human gastrointestinal tract in health and during inflammatory bowel disease. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 48, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Barmeyer, C.; Schulzke, J.D.; Fromm, M. Claudin-related intestinal diseases. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 42, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Prasad, S.; Mingrino, R.; Kaukinen, K.; Hayes, K.L.; Powell, R.M.; Macdonald, T.T.; Collins, J. Inflammatory processes have differential effects on claudins 2, 3 and 4 in colonic epithelial cells. Lab. Investig. 2005, 85, 1139–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, E.; Ajuwon, K.M. Mechanism of endocytic regulation of intestinal tight junction remodeling during nutrient starvation in jejunal IPEC-J2 cells. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rosenthal, R.; Milatz, S.; Krug, S.; Oelrich, B.; Schulzke, J.-D.; Amasheh, S.; Günzel, D.; Fromm, M. Claudin-2, a component of the tight junction, forms a paracellular water channel. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 1913–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, Y.; Mumm, J.B.; Herbst, R.; Kolbeck, R.; Wang, Y. IL-22 Increases Permeability of Intestinal Epithelial Tight Junctions by Enhancing Claudin-2 Expression. J. Immunol. 2017, 199, 3316–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Krishnan, M.; Penrose, H.; Shah, N.N.; Marchelletta, R.R.; McCole, D.F. VSL#3 Probiotic Stimulates T-cell Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase–mediated Recovery of IFN-γ–induced Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Defects. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 2811–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Suzuki, T.; Yoshinaga, N.; Tanabe, S. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Regulates Claudin-2 Expression and Tight Junction Permeability in Intestinal Epithelium. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 31263–31271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Krishnan, M.; McCole, D.F. T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase prevents STAT1 induction of claudin-2 expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1405, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Marchelletta, R.R.; McCole, D.F. T-Cell Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Protects Intestinal Barrier Function by Restricting Epithelial Tight Junction Remodeling. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  46. The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3000 shared controls. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 447, 661–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Simoncic, P.D.; Lee-Loy, A.; Barber, D.L.; Tremblay, M.L.; McGlade, C. The T Cell Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Is a Negative Regulator of Janus Family Kinases 1 and 3. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Scharl, M.; Hruz, P.; McCole, D.F. Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase non-Receptor Type 2 regulates IFN-γ-induced cytokine signaling in THP-1 monocytes. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010, 16, 2055–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Glas, J.; Wagner, J.; Seiderer, J.; Olszak, T.; Wetzke, M.; Beigel, F.; Tillack, C.; Stallhofer, J.; Friedrich, M.; Steib, C.; et al. PTPN2 Gene Variants Are Associated with Susceptibility to Both Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Supporting a Common Genetic Disease Background. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Buzza, M.S.; Netzel-Arnett, S.; Shea-Donohue, T.; Zhao, A.; Lin, C.-Y.; List, K.; Szabo, R.; Fasano, A.; Bugge, T.H.; Antalis, T.M. Membrane-anchored serine protease matriptase regulates epithelial barrier formation and permeability in the intestine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4200–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fanning, A.S.; Anderson, J.M. PDZ domains: Fundamental building blocks in the organization of protein complexes at the plasma membrane. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 103, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McNeil, E.; Capaldo, C.T.; Macara, I.G. Zonula Occludens-1 Function in the Assembly of Tight Junctions in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Epithelial Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2006, 17, 1922–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. González-Mariscal, L.; Betanzos, A.; Nava, P.; Jaramillo, B. Tight junction proteins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2003, 81, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Itoh, M.; Furuse, M.; Morita, K.; Kubota, K.; Saitou, M.; Tsukita, S. Direct Binding of Three Tight Junction-Associated Maguks, Zo-1, Zo-2, and Zo-3, with the Cooh Termini of Claudins. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 147, 1351–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ebnet, K.; Schulz, C.U.; zu Brickwedde, M.-K.M.; Pendl, G.G.; Vestweber, D. Junctional Adhesion Molecule Interacts with the PDZ Domain-containing Proteins AF-6 and ZO-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 27979–27988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Oshitani, N.; Watanabe, K.; Nakamura, S.; Fujiwara, Y.; Higuchi, K.; Arakawa, T. Dislocation of tight junction proteins without F-actin disruption in inactive Crohn’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2005, 15, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gassler, N.; Rohr, C.; Schneider, A.; Kartenbeck, J.; Bach, A.; Obermüller, N.; Otto, H.F.; Autschbach, F. Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with changes of enterocytic junctions. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2001, 281, G216–G228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Das, P.; Goswami, P.; Das, T.K.; Nag, T.; Sreenivas, V.; Ahuja, V.; Panda, S.K.; Gupta, S.D.; Makharia, G.K. Comparative tight junction protein expressions in colonic Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and tuberculosis: A new perspective. Virchows Arch. 2012, 460, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nusrat, A.; Chen, J.A.; Foley, C.S.; Liang, T.W.; Tom, J.; Cromwell, M.; Quan, C.; Mrsny, R.J. The Coiled-coil Domain of Occludin Can Act to Organize Structural and Functional Elements of the Epithelial Tight Junction. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 29816–29822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Furuse, M.; Hirase, T.; Itoh, M.; Nagafuchi, A.; Yonemura, S.; Tsukita, S. Occludin: A novel integral membrane protein localizing at tight junctions. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 123, 1777–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Heller, F.; Florian, P.; Bojarski, C.; Richter, J.; Christ, M.; Hillenbrand, B.; Mankertz, J.; Gitter, A.H.; Bürgel, N.; Fromm, M. Interleukin-13 Is the Key Effector Th2 Cytokine in Ulcerative Colitis That Affects Epithelial Tight Junctions, Apoptosis, and Cell Restitution. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 550–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Poritz, L.S.; Harris, L.R.; Kelly, A.A.; Koltun, W.A. Increase in the Tight Junction Protein Claudin-1 in Intestinal Inflammation. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011, 56, 2802–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Krug, S.M.; Amasheh, S.; Richter, J.F.; Milatz, S.; Günzel, D.; Westphal, J.K.; Huber, O.; Schulzke, J.D.; Fromm, M. Tricellulin Forms a Barrier to Macromolecules in Tricellular Tight Junctions without Affecting Ion Permeability. Mol. Biol. Cell 2009, 20, 3713–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Krug, S.M.; Bojarski, C.; Fromm, A.; Schulzke, J.D.; Fromm, M. Tricellulin in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 998.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hu, J.-C.E.; Weiß, F.; Bojarski, C.; Branchi, F.; Schulzke, J.-D.; Fromm, M.; Krug, S.M. Expression of tricellular tight junction proteins and the paracellular macromolecule barrier are recovered in remission of ulcerative colitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021, 21, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Krug, S.; Bojarski, C.; Fromm, A.; Lee, I.M.; Dames, P.; Richter, J.F.; Turner, J.R.; Fromm, M.; Schulzke, J.-D. Tricellulin is regulated via interleukin-13-receptor α2, affects macromolecule uptake, and is decreased in ulcerative colitis. Mucosal Immunol. 2018, 11, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Hu, J.-C.E.; Bojarski, C.; Branchi, F.; Fromm, M.; Krug, S.M. Leptin Downregulates Angulin-1 in Active Crohn’s Disease via STAT3. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Eder, P.; Adler, M.; Dobrowolska, A.; Kamhieh-Milz, J.; Witowski, J. The Role of Adipose Tissue in the Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Outcomes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cells 2019, 8, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Martìn-Padura, I.; Lostaglio, S.; Schneemann, M.; Williams, L.; Romano, M.; Fruscella, P.; Panzeri, C.; Stoppacciaro, A.; Ruco, L.; Villa, A.; et al. Junctional Adhesion Molecule, a Novel Member of the Immunoglobulin Superfamily That Distributes at Intercellular Junctions and Modulates Monocyte Transmigration. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 142, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kucharzik, T.; Walsh, S.V.; Chen, J.; Parkos, C.A.; Nusrat, A. Neutrophil Transmigration in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Associated with Differential Expression of Epithelial Intercellular Junction Proteins. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 159, 2001–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Fan, S.; Weight, C.M.; Luissint, A.-C.; Hilgarth, R.S.; Brazil, J.C.; Ettel, M.; Nusrat, A.; Parkos, C.A. Role of JAM-A tyrosine phosphorylation in epithelial barrier dysfunction during intestinal inflammation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2019, 30, 566–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Marchiando, A.M.; Shen, L.; Graham, W.; Edelblum, K.L.; Duckworth, C.; Guan, Y.; Montrose, M.H.; Turner, J.R.; Watson, A.J. The Epithelial Barrier Is Maintained by In Vivo Tight Junction Expansion during Pathologic Intestinal Epithelial Shedding. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 1208–1218.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Günther, C.; Ruder, B.; Stolzer, I.; Dorner, H.; He, G.-W.; Chiriac, M.T.; Aden, K.; Strigli, A.; Bittel, M.; Zeissig, S.; et al. Interferon Lambda Promotes Paneth Cell Death Via STAT1 Signaling in Mice and Is Increased in Inflamed Ileal Tissues of Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 1310–1322.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Stolzer, I.; Dressel, A.; Chiriac, M.T.; Neurath, M.F.; Günther, C. An IFN-STAT Axis Augments Tissue Damage and Inflammation in a Mouse Model of Crohn’s Disease. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Richmond, C.A.; Rickner, H.; Shah, M.S.; Ediger, T.; Deary, L.; Zhou, F.; Tovaglieri, A.; Carlone, D.L.; Breault, D.T. JAK/STAT-1 Signaling Is Required for Reserve Intestinal Stem Cell Activation during Intestinal Regeneration Following Acute Inflammation. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 10, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Pharmaceuticals 14 00840 g001 550
Figure 1. Intestinal permeability leads to intestinal inflammation. Tight junctions are the primary regulator of intestinal paracellular permeability and act as a selective ‘gate’ for nutrients and fluids while preventing passage of foreign antigens. Alterations in expression and localization of tight junction proteins can lead to increased intestinal permeability and provide a pathway for paracellular access of luminal pathogenic agents to lamina propria immune cells, in addition to loss of electrolytes and fluid. Accumulation of these agents can potentially overwhelm the underlying immune system and collectively cause intestinal inflammation. This illustration was made using BioRender.
Figure 1. Intestinal permeability leads to intestinal inflammation. Tight junctions are the primary regulator of intestinal paracellular permeability and act as a selective ‘gate’ for nutrients and fluids while preventing passage of foreign antigens. Alterations in expression and localization of tight junction proteins can lead to increased intestinal permeability and provide a pathway for paracellular access of luminal pathogenic agents to lamina propria immune cells, in addition to loss of electrolytes and fluid. Accumulation of these agents can potentially overwhelm the underlying immune system and collectively cause intestinal inflammation. This illustration was made using BioRender.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00840 g001
Pharmaceuticals 14 00840 g002 550
Figure 2. JAK-STAT regulation of intestinal permeability: Pore Pathway. During intestinal inflammation, proinflammatory cytokines are released and bind to their respective receptors on intestinal epithelial cells. The associated cellular tyrosine kinases, JAKs, are then brought together and activated. These interactions subsequently lead to phosphorylation of the cytokine receptor which act as hubs for STATs. The JAKs would then phosphorylate the STATS and the phosphorylated STATs would dimerize, enter the nucleus, and serve as transcription factors for genes that express tight junction proteins which influence intestinal permeability. In the pore pathway, claudin-2 expression is upregulated in response to IL-22, IFN-γ, and IL-6. Expression of barrier-sealing claudins is reduced; however, the mechanisms that underlie these alterations require further investigation. The JAK inhibitors tofacitinib, AZD1480, and JAK inhibitor I, reduce expression of claudin-2 and consequent paracellular permeability via the pore pathway. Downregulation of claudin-2 expression has also been reported with STAT1 and STAT3 siRNA intervention. Levels of barrier-sealing claudins are suggested to return to normal levels during remission of inflammation. These illustrations were made using BioRender. (CLDN2: Claudin-2 Gene, JAK: Janus Kinase, STAT: Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription).
Figure 2. JAK-STAT regulation of intestinal permeability: Pore Pathway. During intestinal inflammation, proinflammatory cytokines are released and bind to their respective receptors on intestinal epithelial cells. The associated cellular tyrosine kinases, JAKs, are then brought together and activated. These interactions subsequently lead to phosphorylation of the cytokine receptor which act as hubs for STATs. The JAKs would then phosphorylate the STATS and the phosphorylated STATs would dimerize, enter the nucleus, and serve as transcription factors for genes that express tight junction proteins which influence intestinal permeability. In the pore pathway, claudin-2 expression is upregulated in response to IL-22, IFN-γ, and IL-6. Expression of barrier-sealing claudins is reduced; however, the mechanisms that underlie these alterations require further investigation. The JAK inhibitors tofacitinib, AZD1480, and JAK inhibitor I, reduce expression of claudin-2 and consequent paracellular permeability via the pore pathway. Downregulation of claudin-2 expression has also been reported with STAT1 and STAT3 siRNA intervention. Levels of barrier-sealing claudins are suggested to return to normal levels during remission of inflammation. These illustrations were made using BioRender. (CLDN2: Claudin-2 Gene, JAK: Janus Kinase, STAT: Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00840 g002
Pharmaceuticals 14 00840 g003 550
Figure 3. JAK-STAT regulation of intestinal permeability: Leak Pathway. The leak pathway is associated with altered expression and localization of ZO-1, occludin, and tricellulin resulting in lower levels of these proteins at the tight junction. Expression of JAM-A is also downregulated through the JAK-STAT pathway. JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitors prevented the decrease in tricellulin expression by IL-13. Furthermore, with tofacitinib treatment, the reduced expression and mislocalization of ZO-1 and occludin induced by IFN-γ are mostly reversed. JAM-A levels were also corrected by tofacitinib. These illustrations were made using BioRender. (JAK: Janus Kinase, STAT: Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription, OCLN: Occludin Gene, TRIC: Tricellulin Gene, JAM-A: Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A Gene).
Figure 3. JAK-STAT regulation of intestinal permeability: Leak Pathway. The leak pathway is associated with altered expression and localization of ZO-1, occludin, and tricellulin resulting in lower levels of these proteins at the tight junction. Expression of JAM-A is also downregulated through the JAK-STAT pathway. JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitors prevented the decrease in tricellulin expression by IL-13. Furthermore, with tofacitinib treatment, the reduced expression and mislocalization of ZO-1 and occludin induced by IFN-γ are mostly reversed. JAM-A levels were also corrected by tofacitinib. These illustrations were made using BioRender. (JAK: Janus Kinase, STAT: Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription, OCLN: Occludin Gene, TRIC: Tricellulin Gene, JAM-A: Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A Gene).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00840 g003
Table
Table 1. Current clinical trials of JAK Inhibitors in IBD patients. Source: clinicaltrials.gov. Accessed: 5 August 2021.
Table 1. Current clinical trials of JAK Inhibitors in IBD patients. Source: clinicaltrials.gov. Accessed: 5 August 2021.
JAK InhibitorsTargetStudyAdministrationPhase
SHR0302JAK1A Phase II Study in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Crohn’s DiseaseN/APhase 2
TD-1473Pan-JAKEfficacy and Safety of TD-1473 in Crohn’s DiseaseOralPhase 2
TD-1473Pan-JAKTD-1473 Long-Term Safety (LTS) Ulcerative Colitis (UC) StudyOralPhase 2/Phase 3
TD-1473Pan-JAKEfficacy and Safety of TD-1473 in Ulcerative ColitisOralPhase 2B/Phase 3
UpadacitinibJAK1A Maintenance and Long-Term Extension Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) in Participants with Crohn’s Disease Who Completed the Studies M14-431 or M14-433OralPhase 3
UpadacitinibJAK1A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) in Participants with Ulcerative Colitis (UC)OralPhase 3
UpadacitinibJAK1A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) in Participants with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease Who Have Inadequately Responded to or Are Intolerant to Biologic TherapyOralPhase 3
UpadacitinibJAK1A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC)OralPhase 3
UpadacitinibJAK1A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease Who Have Inadequately Responded to or Are Intolerant to Conventional and/or Biologic TherapiesOralPhase 3
UpadacitinibJAK1A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Administration of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) in Participants with Crohn’s DiseaseOralPhase 2
TofacitinibPan-JAKA Study of Tofacitinib in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Stable RemissionOralPhase 4
Table
Table 2. JAK-STAT signaling pathways affecting intestinal permeability. (JAK: Janus Kinase, STAT: Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription, IL-22: Interleukin 22, IFN-γ: Interferon gamma, IL-6: Interleukin 6, IL-13: Interleukin 13, JAM-A: Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A, ZO-1: Zonula Occludens-1, TEER: Transepithelial electrical resistance, FD4: 4-kilodalton fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, SOCS: Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling, siRNA: Small interfering ribonucleic acid).
Table 2. JAK-STAT signaling pathways affecting intestinal permeability. (JAK: Janus Kinase, STAT: Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription, IL-22: Interleukin 22, IFN-γ: Interferon gamma, IL-6: Interleukin 6, IL-13: Interleukin 13, JAM-A: Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A, ZO-1: Zonula Occludens-1, TEER: Transepithelial electrical resistance, FD4: 4-kilodalton fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, SOCS: Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling, siRNA: Small interfering ribonucleic acid).
JAK-STATsActivators in IBDEffect on TJ ProteinsEffect on PermeabilityJAK/STAT InhibitorsReferences
STAT1 and STAT3IL-22Increased claudin-2 expressionIncreased paracellular permeability to ionic solutes; Reduced TEERJAK Inhibitor 1 and AZD1480
(Inhibited the STAT3-dependent gene, SOCS3)		[41]
JAK1-STAT1/STAT3IFN-γIncreased claudin-2 expressionIncreased paracellular permeability; Reduced TEER, Increased FD4 permeabilityTofacitinib[9]
STAT3IL-6Increases claudin-2 expressionIncreases paracellular permeability to ionic solutes; Reduced TEERAG490, STAT3 siRNA[35,43]
UndeterminedPresumably IFN-γDecreased JAM-A expression; Possible redistribution of JAM-AIncreased paracellular permeability to macromolecules; Presumably reduces TEER and increases FD4 permeabilityTofacitinib[8]
UndeterminedIFN-γDecreased occludin expression; Redistribution of occludinIncreased paracellular permeability to larger macromoleculesTofacitinib[8,9]
JAK1/JAK2IL-13, IFN-γDownregulation of tricellulin; Redistribution of tricellulinIncreased uptake of macromolecules through the paracellular spaceBaricitinib, Tofacitinib[8,9,66]
STAT3 and JAK2LeptinDownregulation of angulin-1Tricellulin localization is altered; Increased intestinal permeabilityStattic, WP1006, and partially by AG490[66,67,68]
UndeterminedIFN-γDownregulation and redistribution of ZO-1Increased paracellular permeability to macromoleculesTofacitinib[8,9]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lei, H.; Crawford, M.S.; McCole, D.F. JAK-STAT Pathway Regulation of Intestinal Permeability: Pathogenic Roles and Therapeutic Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090840

AMA Style

Lei H, Crawford MS, McCole DF. JAK-STAT Pathway Regulation of Intestinal Permeability: Pathogenic Roles and Therapeutic Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Pharmaceuticals. 2021; 14(9):840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090840

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lei, Hillmin, Meli’sa S. Crawford, and Declan F. McCole. 2021. "JAK-STAT Pathway Regulation of Intestinal Permeability: Pathogenic Roles and Therapeutic Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease" Pharmaceuticals 14, no. 9: 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090840

APA Style

Lei, H., Crawford, M. S., & McCole, D. F. (2021). JAK-STAT Pathway Regulation of Intestinal Permeability: Pathogenic Roles and Therapeutic Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Pharmaceuticals, 14(9), 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090840

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop