Next Article in Journal
Combined Treatment with Acalabrutinib and Rapamycin Inhibits Glioma Stem Cells and Promotes Vascular Normalization by Downregulating BTK/mTOR/VEGF Signaling
Next Article in Special Issue
Humanization, Radiolabeling and Biodistribution Studies of an IgG1-Type Antibody Targeting Uncomplexed PSA for Theranostic Applications
Previous Article in Journal
PRODH/POX-Dependent Celecoxib-Induced Apoptosis in MCF-7 Breast Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fusion-Based Neutron Generator Production of Tc-99m and Tc-101: A Prospective Avenue to Technetium Theranostics

by
Edward J. Mausolf
1,
Erik V. Johnstone
1,*,
Natalia Mayordomo
2,
David L. Williams
3,
Eugene Yao Z. Guan
3 and
Charles K. Gary
3
1
Innovative Fuel Solutions LLC, North Las Vegas, NV 89031, USA
2
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden–Rossendorf (HZDR), Institute of Resource Ecology, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
3
Adelphi Technology, Inc., Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(9), 875; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090875
Submission received: 12 July 2021 / Revised: 20 August 2021 / Accepted: 26 August 2021 / Published: 29 August 2021

Abstract

:
Presented are the results of 99mTc and 101Tc production via neutron irradiation of natural isotopic molybdenum (Mo) with epithermal/resonance neutrons. Neutrons were produced using a deuterium-deuterium (D-D) neutron generator with an output of 2 × 1010 n/s. The separation of Tc from an irradiated source of bulk, low-specific activity (LSA) Mo on activated carbon (AC) was demonstrated. The yields of 99mTc and 101Tc, together with their potential use in medical single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) procedures, have been evaluated from the perspective of commercial production, with a patient dose consisting of 740 MBq (20 mCi) of 99mTc. The number of neutron generators to meet the annual 40,000,000 world-wide procedures is estimated for each imaging modality: 99mTc versus 101Tc, D-D versus deuterium-tritium (D-T) neutron generator system outputs, and whether or not natural molybdenum or enriched targets are used for production. The financial implications for neutron generator production of these isotopes is also presented. The use of 101Tc as a diagnostic, therapeutic, and/or theranostic isotope for use in medical applications is proposed and compared to known commercial nuclear diagnostic and therapeutic isotopes.

1. Introduction

99mTc (t1/2 = 6.007 h; IT 99.9%) is the single most used isotope for all nuclear diagnostic-imaging procedures—it accounts for a majority of the radiopharmaceutical market, and essentially encompasses the whole of the single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) modality in the low-energy field [1]. There are several production routes for generating 99mTc [2,3], although the primary means of commercially derived 99mTc is produced from 99Mo (t1/2 = 65.924 h; β 100%) via neutron-driven nuclear reactions, of which, are dependent upon and characterised by the chemical and isotopic composition of the target material. For example, the use of either natural or enriched Mo or enriched U (20–90% 235U) targets. Under these scenarios, the 98Mo or 235U targets are irradiated with a neutron source, such as a nuclear reactor, and form 99Mo via 98Mo(n,γ)99Mo or 235U (n, fission) 99Mo (~6% fission yield), respectively. The generated 99Mo being sent to a processor is isolated, refined, and loaded onto a column, where Tc retention is negligible, such as alumina (Al2O3) [4], and fixed in a portable generator for subsequent distribution. At the receiving end, whether it be a nuclear pharmacy or a hospital, the 99mTc is eluted from the generator, compounded, and delivered to the point of use where it is administered to a patient. However, during this process a significant quantity of 99Mo/99mTc produced in this manner is typically lost due to decay (~1% per hour); the drug delivered at the end-patient user routinely accounts for less than 10% of the initial activity isolated from the reactor or the irradiation source at end of bombardment (EOB).
Because of the relatively short half-lives of both the parent (99Mo) and the daughter (99mTc), the radioisotope pair must continually be produced and distributed, as a long-term supply cannot be stockpiled. It has been said that this constraint impacts the possible production and distribution modes and models, the quantity of waste generated during production [5], and critically, the cost burden of the drug due to unused radioisotope lost to decay; the supply side is recognised [1] as being sub-optimal.
The supply chain has been interrupted several times in recent years leading to shortages of the drug(s) [6,7,8,9]. Over the last decade, efforts to integrate redundancy within the production side of the supply chain (coordinated scheduling, back-up producers, varying production loads, etc.) have been a major focus of the industry. Although, issues such as unplanned outages [10], accidents [11], and maintenance of the nuclear reactors have led to varying production loads. As the current infrastructure and its resources succumb to ageing, where key nuclear reactors will eventually be brought offline and decommissioned, it is probable that further logistical and technical issues will arise.
Bottlenecks in the supply-chain can occur as a result of the small number of 99Mo processors [1]. Reported consequences have been the inflation of drug pricing [12] and a reduction of emerging competition into the market to help combat rising costs [13]. The issue is further complicated by a lack of funding and issues related to the integration and implementation of waste processing and long-term disposal into the full-cost recovery (FCR) model further complicate the issue [1] and had not been entirely unforeseen [14].
In this paper, experimental production of 99Mo/99mTc and 101Mo/101Tc using a neutron generator without the use of uranium (U) or special nuclear material (SNM) is presented. The potential impact that neutron generator-produced 99Mo/99mTc and 101Mo/101Tc can have on the future of both diagnostic and theranostic modalities is considered. Whereas 99mTc is typically considered a purely diagnostic isotope [15], it is envisioned that 101Tc (t1/2 = 14.22 min) could be applied as an ephemeral theranostic agent; a beta emission (~487 keV, 90.3% [16]) for radiotherapeutics is complemented by a 307 keV (89.4%) gamma emission ideal for synchronised diagnostic scanning [17]. In addition, the 99mTc/101Tc pair may be useful in dual imaging modalities [18], where the similar chemistry, but differing nuclear properties of the two isotopes could be exploited.
Neutron generator produced isotopes coupled with real-time use, may off-set to an extent (or minimises) fission product waste from uranium post-processing, increases more efficient use of 99mTc, and potentially coincides with the requirements of FCR [1]. It is believed that the production of 101Tc is optimal when using compact accelerator neutron sources like neutron generators due to its shorter half-life. The use of 101Tc would be analogous to the use of short-lived therapeutics and commercially-known positron emitters in the positron emission tomography (PET) imaging modality [19], which require either local or even on-site production in the vicinity of the patient, such as with a mobile imaging unit. We therefore demonstrate the use of neutron generators as a source of neutrons to produce these isotopes combined with an extraction method for removing Tc from bulk Mo. Measurements demonstrating that neutron generators are a potential route to producing these isotopes are presented along with financial considerations for their commercial implementation.

2. Results

2.1. Production of 99Mo, 101Mo, 99mTc and 101Tc with a Neutron Generator

The liquid ammonium heptamolybdate (AHM) sample was irradiated with neutrons produced by an Adelphi DD110M neutron generator. Despite the high neutron generator yield of 2.2 × 1010 n/s the thermal flux measured by gold foil activation was only 1.5 × 104 n/cm2·s due to incomplete thermalization. The yield was determined from Bonner ball measurements that were consistent with the known yield from the generator arising from a 160 kV and D+ current of approximately 30 mA. Following irradiation, each sample was transferred to a high purity germanium (HPGe) detector for subsequent counting as shown diagrammatically in Figure 1a in order to detect for the presence of the short-lived species 101Mo (t1/2 = 14.61 min) and 101Tc in the target material. Measurements were carried out for 10 min. The shielded HPGe detector is shown in Figure 1b.
Figure 2 shows the gamma ray spectrum of AHM solution measured immediately following irradiation. Prominent signals from both the shorter-lived isotopes 101Mo and 101Tc are present directly following irradiation. Characteristic gamma lines for 101Mo can be observed at ~590 keV (~19.2%), ~191 keV (18.2%), and 506 keV (11.6%), while gamma lines at ~307 keV (89.4%), ~545 keV (5.96%), and ~531 keV (1.00%) are indicative of 101Tc. Much less discernible, but present in the spectrum, are the contributions arising from 99Mo at ~740 keV (12.2%) and ~181 keV (6.1%). After the short irradiation and counting time relative to the half-life of 99Mo, it would not be expected that significant 99mTc would be present at this point, which is consistent with the data. The yields of 99Mo, 101Mo, and 101Tc in the liquid target at the start of the counting measurement (t = 0) were calculated to be approximately 52 ± 3 Bq (1.3 ± 0.1 nCi), 1.2 ± 0.1 kBq (32.7 ± 3.5 nCi), and 4.6 ± 0.5 kBq (124.1 ± 13.2 nCi), respectively.
Measurements showing the decay of 99Mo and subsequent growth of its daughter, 99mTc are shown in Figure 3. The plots were prepared from a series of hour-long spectra. The graphs provide the peak area which was evaluated via numerical integration techniques [20] for the 778 keV line of 99Mo and the 140 keV line of 9mTc. The characteristic curve for 9mTc production is a result of the interplay between the half-life of the parent, 99Mo (t1/2 = 65.924 h) and that of the daughter, 99mTc (t1/2 = 6.007 h;). It should be noted that 101Tc (t1/2 = 14.22 min) and 101Mo (t1/2 = 14.61 min;) are also produced, but have much shorter half-lives (Figure 3). Theoretically, the maximum activity of 99mTc obtained from 99Mo decay after 22.89 h of growing time [21], which is consistent with the data shown in Figure 3b. The calculated theoretical peak production yield of 99mTc from the decay of 52 Bq of 99Mo at approximately this time is approximately 35 Bq (0.95 nCi).
Additionally, the spectra of 99Mo and 99mTc were recorded over a longer period of time (Figure 4). The decay plots were used to determine the decay constants for the 778 keV peak of 99Mo and the 141 keV peak for 99mTc. The calculated decay constants for both peaks were approximately 2.75 days or 66 h, which is indicative of the transient equilibrium relationship between the mother-daughter radioisotope pair, where the decay rate is established by the half-life of the mother isotope, i.e., 99Mo.
The data shown in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 detail the production of 99mTc occurred as a result of irradiation by the neutron generator and also indicates optimal times for extracting the 99mTc from solution.

2.2. Isolation of 101Tc and 99mTc from Irradiated AHM Solution

Figure 2 shows the presence of both Tc (i.e., 101Tc) and Mo (i.e., 101Mo and 99Mo) isotopes in the irradiated AHM solution present at EOB. The produced Tc, likely in the form of the pertechnetate anion [TcO4], was subsequently extracted from the bulk Mo in the irradiated AHM solution using column chromatography with AC as the column substrate [22]. Gamma ray spectra (Figure 5) of the solution and the extracted sample demonstrate successful removal of 101Tc and 99mTc from the solution onto AC. It is noted that isolation of 101Tc was near total, however, some peaks of residual 101Mo were identified (i.e., 506 keV and 591 keV) in the first hour following extraction (Figure 5a), likely due to inadequate washing of the column. Furthermore, no readily distinguishable peaks above the background from 99Mo, which was also present in solution, were identifiable, and the most prevalent species on the AC is 101Tc. The extraction performed after one-day was free from any 99Mo/101Mo, and only 99mTc was found present (Figure 5b).

3. Discussion

3.1. Production of 99Mo/99mTc and 101Mo/101Tc Using a Neutron Generator and Mo Targetry

The production of the radioisotope mother-daughter pairs 101Mo/101Tc and 99Mo/99mTc using a D-D neutron generator and a liquid Mo target was demonstrated. Whereas the use of a neutron generator for producing 99Mo/99mTc from Mo targets for the consideration of commercial application has been previously reported upon [23], it is not apparent that this has been the case for 101Mo/101Tc. Historically, the 101Mo/101Tc pair has served as a signature in neutron activation studies, and in the context of 99Mo/99mTc it has been considered an impurity coinciding from the use of Mo targets [24,25]. Similarly, 101Tc has been reported for cyclotron production of 99mTc, although only as an impurity generated via the 100Mo(p, γ) reaction.
Interestingly, the neutron capture properties of 98Mo and 100Mo are somewhat comparable. For example, the thermal neutron capture cross-sections are 0.130 b and 0.199 b for 98Mo and 100Mo, respectively, meanwhile the resonance integral cross-sections are 6.70 b for 98Mo and 3.76 b for 100Mo. Employing fast neutron regimes, such is the case with a D-D generator, permits access through down-scattering interactions, using a light moderator or within the sample itself, into the resonance regions with higher capture probabilities. However, the capture cross-sections for both isotopes drastically fall off at energies above 1 MeV, so it is noted that some moderation is required. Although the targetry investigated here was rudimentary in design, the authors envision the implementation of larger target masses and geometries where the target surrounds the neutron generator at the point of neutron production, better facilitating the interactions previously discussed.
Another key component of the system is the absence of detection of 99mTc at the time of measurement, i.e., promptly after EOB. As discussed, this results from the short irradiation time relative to the half-life of the parent isotope 99Mo, where no significant quantities of 99mTc would have been expected to be produced through the decay of 99Mo. It is noted that peak activity of 99mTc as a result of decay typically occurs just short of 23 h-a characteristic feature exploited in the operation of 99mTc commercial generators in radiopharmacies for elution scheduling, where elutions are performed once or twice a day as the industry standard. Therefore, either longer irradiation or longer decay times would generate 99mTc (and 99gTc; t1/2 = 211,100 y) in the system. Coincidentally, this phenomenon permits several options when using natural isotopic targets or varying ratios of mixed enriched targets of 98Mo/100Mo. 1) The isolation of either 101Tc or 99mTc, where short irradiations and decay periods are ideal for 101Tc, and longer irradiation periods and/or decay periods for 99mTc, or 2) the co-production of 101Tc and 99mTc by employing long irradiation times with short decay periods. In the scenario for sole production of 101Tc, one drawback using targets containing 98Mo would be the potential build-in of 99Mo, thus target irradiation schedules would require sufficient decay periods to remove 99Mo/99mTc/99gTc from the system, where any residual 99mTc/99gTc could be removed through chemical processing prior to the next irradiation. For the latter production option, the ratio of 101Tc:99mTc could be tailored for specific applications through the combination of enrichment ratios of 98Mo:100Mo and the duration of irradiation.
Using the extrapolated data, the estimated 99Mo (and its daughter 99mTc) production yield as a function of time for a D-D neutron generator outputting 2 × 1010 n/s, where a Mo target situated around the generator consumes/captures all of the neutrons produced and contains minimised impurities (an isotopically pure 98Mo system is assumed), has been shown in Table 1. It is noted, that for simplicity neutron capture probabilities (i.e., capture cross-sections) are considered negligible, and the number of atoms in the target becomes equivalent to the neutron output (n/s) when complete neutron consumption within the target is assumed. Therefore, using Equation (1), only the neutron output (n/s) and the buildup term [1 − e−λt] for 99Mo are considered.

3.2. Inventory of Neutron Generators Required for Worldwide Annual Production

With a worldwide consumption of 99mTc in excess of 40,000,000 patient doses annually, where each dose is equivalent to 740 MBq, a significant amount of the parent isotope 99Mo must be generated on a weekly basis in order to fulfil demand. This is especially true when factoring in decay following EOB from the reactor or irradiation centre. The use of a neutron generator provides the possibility of generating isotopes at the point of use, for example at a hospital, a temporary field location, oncologist offices, etc. [23]. By using 99mTc from 99Mo that is continuously being generated and decaying in real time with a neutron generator, there are less inefficiencies and decay losses due to avoiding unnecessary cooling periods, manipulations, and transportation.
From Table 1, the estimated amount of doses of 99mTc using two different production models was considered. The first model is represented by the commercial industry standard, whereby a target generating 99Mo is irradiated for a week, decoupled from the production source, loaded into a generator device, and the 99mTc resulting from the 99Mo decay is “milked” approximately every 24 h [26]. The second model assumes the neutron generator is continuously irradiating the target and only the end-product (i.e., 99mTc) is decoupled from the source of production. Under these circumstances, when production in the target material approaches saturation, the amount of 99Mo produced is in near steady-state. Thus, the daily amount of 99mTc that can be removed from the system remains constant and does not decrease, as is the case for standard commercial 99Mo/99mTc generators. Comparison of the two models and the efficiency gains for continuous generator is shown in Table 2.
As experimentally demonstrated, similar systems could be utilised for producing 101Tc, and its application as a direct substitute for 99mTc was considered. For 101Tc, the time required to reach peak activity from the decay of 101Mo is roughly 21 min. Thus, 101Tc in a pure system could be milked approximately every 11 to 22 min from 101Mo decay by analogy with standard 99Mo/99Tc commercial generators. With the persistence of 101Tc from 101Mo easily upwards of 2 h, a source could be milked 5 to 11 times in this timespan. In comparison to 99Mo and 99mTc (half-life ratio ~10.97:1.00, respectively), significant gains in production efficiency for 101Tc would be achieved due to the likeness of half-lives of 101Mo and 101Tc (half-life ratio ~1.03:1.00, respectively). For example, a 22-min period is equal to ~1.51 half-life equivalents of 101Mo, whereas a 24-h period is 0.36 half-life equivalents for 99Mo. Yields due to daughter decay are also affected, where 22 min is 1.55 half-lives of 101Tc, and 24 h is 4.00 half-lives of 99mTc. Therefore, more daughter radioisotope is generated due to faster parent decay and less loss due to daughter decay for 101Mo/101Tc in a comparable system as the 99Mo/99mTc commercial generators. Likewise, approximately 1.2 h would be required for reaching saturation activity (i.e., ~5-half-lives) of 101Mo/101Tc during irradiation; most commercial irradiations for 99Mo/99Tc extend up to 7 days or about 50% of saturation activity for 99Mo. Furthermore, the decay of 101Mo is solely 101Tc and the end-decay member of the A = 101 isobar chain is 101Ru. Therefore, losses in sequential labelling of 101Tc due to lowered specific activity with competition of the presence of other Tc isotopes, such as with 99mTc/99gTc during radiopharmaceutical tagging, is not incurred. It is mentioned that the presence of 99gTc arises from both the decay of 99Mo directly (branching decay ~13.95%) and via the isomeric transition decay of 99mTc.
Shown in Table 3, the total amount of neutron generators required to supply 40,000,000 doses of 99mTc per year (109,589 doses per day) is calculated as a function of doses produced per day using targets of either natural Mo or pure 98Mo, and the generator neutron flux, e.g., 2 × 1010 n/s. and 2 × 1012 n/s, where the former represents the output capabilities of D-D generators, as tested here, and the latter of D-T. The equivalent of 101Tc when directly substituted for 99mTc, using a 1:10 ratio factor for 99mTc to 101Tc, in a system is also considered.
As a point of comparison, the IAEA reported that there are over 1500 cyclotron facilities distributed around the world [27]. Aiming for this number with the neutron generator model described here, it can be assumed that neutron outputs of ~1010 n/s would be too low, even when employing enriched Mo targets, and an excessive number of neutron generators would be required for fulfilling the global daily requirement of 99mTc. However, at neutron outputs of ~1012 n/s, meeting this figure is easily achieved. When switching to the 101Tc system, even the lower neutron output and natural Mo target provide a comparable number of required generators to the IAEA figure for cyclotrons, whereas at ~1012 n/s only a few systems would be required regardless of target composition.

3.3. Financial Considerations for Neutron Generator Production

Neutrons can be generated by various means, such as those listed in Table 4. The D-D neutron generators used in this research have both the lowest yield and also lowest cost compared to other approaches presented. Commercially available D-D neutron generators with yields close to 5 × 1010 n/s, such as those used in this work [28], have recently become commercially available for applications such as boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), where they can be deployed as an assembly of multiple generators clustered around a patient [29].
Similarly, clusters of D-D generators may be the most cost-effective route to isotope production, especially when production is intended to be deployed close to point-of-use. All of the systems listed in Table 4 require a dedicated facility with sufficient shielding for safe operation. In the case of D-D neutron generators the cost of the facility can be comparable to the cost of the neutron source, primarily because of the relatively low cost of the neutron source. When higher yields are required, linacs, cyclotrons and even reactors may prove the more cost-effective approach, but for small systems, the D-D neutron generator approach may have some merit.

3.4. Separation of Tc from LSA Mo Using AC

The affinity and uptake of Tc, particularly as [TcO4], with AC is a well-known phenomenon and has been reported in many studies over the span of several decades [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Although the mechanism of Tc sorption onto AC is considered a complex process [46], there have been several driving mechanisms identified, such as electrostatic interactions, physisorption, chemisorption/ion-exchange, etc., which have been said to dictate this behaviour [47]. The [TcO4] anion is considered a relatively large anion with a low charge density, a low degree of hydration [48], and exhibits chaotropic character in regards to the Hofmeister series; it is found as the predominant form of Tc under oxidising conditions and across a range of pHs in most non-complexing media. The uptake of Tc on AC occurs at all pHs, however, at acidic pHs below the zero-point-charge of AC, whereby surface species become protonated and the surface becomes positively charged, the kinetics of Tc sorption are significantly enhanced [47,49,50]. Adsorption values greater than 99% [TcO4] (~1 MBq 99mTc) onto AC within 1-min have been reported in the pH range 2–3 where maximum distribution coefficient (Kd) values were measured [51]. The primary contributing surface species are said to be carboxylic, carbonyl, laconic, and phenolic groups, where R–C=O and R–C–OH moieties serve as potential binding sites for [TcO4] [47,49,50] Measured Kd greater than ~105 for Tc uptake onto AC under acidic pHs have been reported [41,47,51]. Even in the presence of competing anions, such as [SO4]2, [PO4]2, [F], [Br], [Cl], and [NO3] does this this phenomenon readily occur, although higher concentrations (i.e., [NO3] (> 0.1 mM), [SO4]2− and [PO4]2− (> 1.0 mM), [Cl] and [Br] (> 10 mM)) can be somewhat inhibiting [40,42,49,50]. Due to the lower standard absolute enthalpy of hydration and similar tetrahedral geometry, [ClO4] does effectively outcompete for [TcO4] on AC [49,50]. For comparison, the change in free energy of adsorption of different anions onto activated carbon was determined to be: [ClO4] > [NO3] > [SO4]2− > [H2PO4] > [ClO3] ≈ [BrO3] > [IO3] [52].
The solution chemistry of Mo is much more intricate than that of Tc, where Mo speciation is highly dependent upon pH due to protonation/condensation/oligomerisation reactions, and it is quite sensitive to its chemical environment [53,54]. This behaviour is particularly apparent in acidic pHs where an assortment of anionic polymolydates with varying degrees of hydration and charge densities, and even cationic or neutral species, can (co)exist [53,54,55]. In solution, polyanionic Mo species, such as [MoO4]2−, are known to form hydrogen bonds stronger than in the surrounding bulk water, classifying them as cosmotropic in nature [56]. It has been shown that Mo adsorption on AC under static conditions is pH dependent, and once again is dictated by the surface charge of AC and the dominant species of Mo in solution [57,58,59,60]. At low pHs (~2–6), whereby the AC surface is positively charged and Mo exists as anionic species in solution (e.g., [Mo7O24]6−, [HMo7O24]5−, [H2Mo7O24]4−, and [MoO4]2−), the interaction of Mo with AC is electrostatically favoured; AC surface functionalities described in the previous paragraph also apply here. Above this region (pH > 6), the AC surface is negatively charged, resulting from the disassociation of weakly acidic sites, and anionic Mo uptake is no longer favoured through electrostatic interactions [57,58]. The Kd coefficients were determined using batch equilibrium techniques for the adsorption of [99MoO4]2− onto AC with nitric acid concentrations ranging from 0.01 M to 2 M; it was found that Kd values, slightly upwards of ~103, were highest at the lowest concentrations and dropped off rapidly with increasing nitric acid, likely due to the formation of non-anionic species [61].
The notion of 99mTc adsorption on AC has been previously discussed in the literature [62]. In fact, the application of using AC to effectively separate 99mTc from LSA 99Mo, which was first demonstrated by Tatenuma et al. [63,64,65], has also been the topic of several subsequent studies from other groups [66,67,68]. For example, Tatenuma et al. demonstrated the separation of 99mTc from Mo targets with specific activities <0.5 Ci/g of 99Mo at neutral pH; isolation of [99mTcO4] in saline solution with a radiochemical purity of 6–7 N within 30–50 min and recoveries between 90–98% were achieved [63]. Production quantities of 99mTc from µCi to hundreds of Cis per batch were determined feasible, and subsequent tagging experiments with HMPAO and MIBI proved comparable to fission-generator-derived 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals in murine models [63].
Presented herein, a similar method of isolating Tc isotopes from irradiated LSA Mo solutions using AC has been demonstrated [22]; however, it is noted that separations were specifically performed under acidic conditions, where the kinetically-driven preferential uptake of Tc as [TcO4] over Mo, likely as anionic polyoxometalate species, onto AC could be exploited. Even at ultra-low specific activities of 101Mo/99Mo and for the shorter-lived 101Tc, effective removal of Tc from the solution was possible using a rudimentary separation platform.

3.5. Technetium-101 as a Potential Ephemeral Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and/or Theranostic Agent

In the field of nuclear medicine, theranostic isotopes are defined as a single isotope or a dual isotope pair, usually of the same element, that exhibits decay characteristics for both therapeutic (i.e., alpha, beta minus, Auger, etc.) and diagnostic decay modes (i.e., beta plus/annihilation, gamma. etc.). This category of isotopes may allow health practitioners to perform radiotherapeutic procedures, for instance for thyroid ablation or in oncological settings where other standard care treatments are not ideal, meanwhile imaging the radiation payload delivered to the site of interest. This may provide practitioners the opportunity to track the progress and success of a procedure as well as ensuring them that unnecessary dose to the patient is not incurred [69]. In contrast to procedures that employ isotopes of homologous elements for the imaging and therapy portions, e.g., 68Ga/177Lu, the use of single element theranostic systems has the added advantage and assurance that chemical and biochemical behaviour especially in vivo will not differ from each other [70].
The inventory of known technetium isotopes, characterised by masses from A = 85 to A = 120, are radioactive [71]. The hallmark isotope, most commonly used for diagnostic imaging on SPECT systems, for technetium is 99mTc. Although the application of 99mTc in Auger electron therapy has been proposed, other isotopes with more favourable nuclear properties are preferred [72], thus its use as a radiotherapeutic is hardly considered. Likewise, other Tc isotopes 94mTc [73], 95gTc and 96gTc [74] have been identified for diagnostic uses in the PET modality, offering the possibility for acquisition of better resolution data or variation in tracer experiment durations.
However, it is not readily obvious in the literature that any Tc isotope has been considered or is currently used for therapeutic purposes, outside of the previously mentioned example of Auger therapy for 99mTc. As an alternative, it is typical to substitute either 186Re or 188Re as a beta-minus emitting radiotherapeutic for 99mTc, being that rhenium is the heavier chemical congener of Tc [75,76]. Although, Re and Tc share many chemical similarities, it is well-known that some pertinent physicochemical properties, such as redox potentials and predominant oxidation states, do differ [77], making the exchange of one for the other not so straightforward [78]. Even in simple systems, such as the binary halides, divergence between the chemistry of the two elements has often been observed [79]. Thus, the availability of a radiotherapeutic/theranostic isotope of Tc would serve as a powerful tool and provide better certainty under these scenarios. Ultimately though, the lack of a previously considered option for Tc likely stems from the fact that most of the accessible beta-minus emitting isotopes of Tc are either considered too long-lived, such as 98Tc (t1/2 = 4.20 × 106 y) or 99gTc (t1/2 = 2.11 × 105 y), or too short-lived, for example 100Tc (t1/2 = 15.56 s), for this application.
The general consensus amongst the scientific and medical communities has been that radiotherapeutic isotopes with half-lives ranging in between 6 h to 7 days were usually the most practical and well-suited as discussed by Qaim [80]. Although, Qaim also points out the biological half-life of an isotope is just as important, where consideration of both these parameters biological and physical half-lives constitute effective half-life. Other important factors relate to the pharmacokinetics of the radioisotope, such as the amount of time required for tagging, administration, site accumulation, and site retention, all of which are considered for determining and creating radiation dosimetry models [81]. However, the main argument against shorter-lived radioisotopes manifests from the feasibility and ease of: (1) delivery to the site of use and (2) storage of the isotope/drug.
Expanding interests in therapeutic and theranostic isotopes has presented a host of candidate radioisotopes, including ones that do not necessarily abide by the major criteria outlined by Qaim. A few such examples of these are 226Th (t1/2 = 30.57 min), which decays by multiple successive alpha emissions to long-lived 210Pb [82], and the beta-minus emitter 214Pb (t1/2 = 27.06 min) and its succession of beta and alpha emitting daughter isotopes [83]. For both radionuclides, integration of the parent isotope, i.e., 230U (t1/2 = 20.23 d) for 226Th and 222Rn (t1/2 = 3.82 d) for 214Pb, into a generator form is a key feature that makes dispensation, tagging, and administering of the end drug possible despite the shorter than usual half-lives [84].
For commercial PET imaging, isotopes with half-lives on the order of minutes to seconds are often implemented, most of which are produced with an accelerator, i.e., cyclotron, for regional distribution and supply, or even directly at the site of use, e.g., hospital. Some of the most notable PET isotopes in this category include 15O (t1/2 = 122.24 s), 13N (t1/2 = 9.97 min), and 11C (t1/2 = 20.36 min). The use of automated synthesis modules and other streamlined manipulation techniques ease the production process, and despite their short-half lives, manufacturing is undertaken in accordance with strict good manufacturing practices (GMP) alongside QA-QC testing prior to dispensation.
By analogy, the suggested production and use for 101Tc is likened to a combination of the aforementioned examples of accelerator-produced, short-lived commercial PET isotopes and the therapeutic radioisotopes 226Th and 214Pb. Like 226Th and 214Pb, 101Tc is a relatively short-lived isotope and emits fundamental nuclear particles that are within the applicable range for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Unlike these isotopes, the parent isotope 101Mo of 101Tc does not allow for a generator-type scenario of usage. Likewise, this behaviour deviates from the production of PET isotopes, which are typically generated directly via transmutation with the charged particle beam, where no intermediate mother radionuclide precedes the end-product. However, as demonstrated here, 101Tc can be produced straightforwardly through neutron capture reactions on 100Mo to form 101Mo followed by beta-minus decay. The shorter half-lives of both the parent and daughter permit ample activity of 101Tc to be produced, even with moderate neutron fluxes and irradiation times under the conditions previously discussed, which in turn would allow for further tagging, QA-QC, and distribution within an immediate locale. Recent efforts on establishing robust and efficient separations of 99mTc from low-specific activity 99Mo targets [2,22,23,63,85,86] also provide possible avenues for the isolation and use of 101Tc. As demonstrated here, the use of activated carbon as a chromatographic substrate is effective for isolating 101Tc from LSA Mo solutions under acidic conditions. When linked to a production source, such as a neutron generator, this particular separation would allow continuous, streamlined and on-demand production and isolation.
As shown in Table 4, 101Tc is a medium energy beta-minus emitter occurring at several prominent energies with the one at ~487 keV (Eβmax = 1320 keV) being the most distinct (~90%). In addition, there are a number of characteristic gamma emissions with the those at 306.8 keV (~89%) and 545 keV (5.9%) being the most notable. The final decay product of the A = 101 isobar chain and daughter product of 101Tc is stable 101Ru. This is particularly advantageous considering that no long-lived radioisotopes are generated, such is the case with its sister isotope 99mTc that yields 99gTc, a byproduct often discarded into the environment post-imaging. Although its commercial use has never been proposed, particularly within the medical field, it can be argued that it would have a logical fit within the known toolbox of medical radioisotopes.
In comparison with other current commercially implemented therapeutic/theranostic beta-emitting radioisotopes (Table 5) [87], with the exception of half-life, 101Tc exhibits unique, yet consistent decay modes. In fact, the most prominent beta energy at 487 keV is situated between theranostic radioisotopes 131I and 177Lu on the lower end, and the pure beta-emitters 89Sr and 90Y on the upper end. Interestingly, 101Tc also lies between both radioisotopes of its elemental congener 186Re and 188Re. However, the primary beta of 89Sr is closest in energy of those radioisotopes listed to 101Tc, and it has a beta penetration range in tissue of approximately 8 mm [87]. A clinical application of 89Sr is targeted radioisotope therapy of osseous metastases; in this regard, it is noted that one of the most common clinical applications of 99mTc diagnostics is for skeletal scintigraphy also known as the “bone scan” with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) or 99mTc-hydroxydiphosphonate (HDP).
In addition, the primary characteristic gamma decay of 101Tc is nearly identical to that of 131I at 364.48 keV, which is often used for SPECT imaging. Not only is imaging feasible with commercial SPECT cameras, but ongoing technology, such as Compton cameras also provide an avenue for imaging options of higher energy gammas [17]. It is noted that whole body, simultaneous dual isotopic imaging of 99mTc and 131I has been reported for the use of locating functioning bone metastases arising from residual differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) following 131I thyroid ablation [88,89].
Although the shorter half-life of 101Tc may seem to be a disadvantage, there are potential benefits that it may provide. One scenario is by lowering extraneous dose to the patient and public. It is envisioned that multiple therapy sessions could be conducted, with the ability to monitor and adjust the amount of radiation administered, over the same duration observed in a single session for current day radiotherapy treatments with longer-lived isotopes. The shorter half-life would also eliminate the need for patient isolation over extended periods, as such can be the case when high doses of radiation with longer half-lives are administered. Furthermore, from a production and supply perspective, many longer-lived radiotherapeutic isotopes are generated using nuclear reactors with high neutron fluxes in order to achieve workable activities and specific activities [90]. Accommodating for this can be logistically complex from the perspectives of scheduling and distribution, as well as financially expensive. On the other hand, the capacity for sufficient production using accelerators like neutron generators allows many of these issues to be circumvented.
Because of the expansive and exhausted knowledge-base of 99mTc and its utilisation in the field of nuclear medicine [91,92,93], it is not difficult for one to draw conclusions on what the potential possibilities and applications for 101Tc could be. Being that it will ideally share nearly identical chemistry and chemical properties as those with 99mTc, most tagging agents and kits would be translatable as well as the biochemical behaviour in vivo of the corresponding tagged moieties. Moreover, opportunities for dual isotopic imaging/therapies with 101Tc and any of the aforementioned medically relevant Tc isotopes also becomes plausible. It is not within the scope of this study to pinpoint any particularly one purpose for 101Tc as a diagnostic, therapeutic, or theranostic agent, but only to bring light to its prospective use.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Neutron Irradiation

The irradiated sample consisted of a solution of natural AHM (NH4)6Mo7O24 (50.00 g, ACS grade, equivalent to 27.15 g Mo) dissolved into ~235 mL of 18 MΩ∙cm−1 deionized water (DI H2O) acidified (~pH 2) with [HNO3] and stored in a polyethylene bottle, as shown in Figure 1b. The sample was placed 6 cm from the neutron source, where it was irradiated for 15 min with an output of 2 × 1010 n/s. The neutron source used was a deuterium-deuterium (D-D) neutron generator (a DD-110M, available from Adelphi Technology, Inc. [94]) producing 2.45 MeV fast neutrons. It employed an acceleration voltage of 160 kV and D+ current of approximately 30 mA. The neutron dose and neutron output were confirmed using a Bonner sphere.

4.2. Gamma Spectroscopy

An Ortec trans-SPEC-DX-100P N-type HPGe detector was used (Figure 1b) and had been calibrated using NIST traceable calibrated sources. The calibration sources were placed on top of the detector in the same location as the samples to be measured. The HPGe crystal was surrounded by lead shielding to reduce the background signals from the environment. The radioisotope 40K is detectable at 1460 keV despite shielding. Using the data from the calibration, the measured efficiencies for the isotopes of interest were determined and are presented in Table 6.

4.3. Measurement of the Neutron Flux (Φ) Based on Gold (Au) Reference

A thin Au reference sample (99.99% purity) with dimensions of 8 mm × 15 mm and a mass of 0.5 g was irradiated for approximately 33.4 min. Activity measurements of the characteristic 411.80 keV peak (95.62%) of 198Au (t1/2 = 2.964 d) were made 18.5 h after the irradiation and were counted as 261 s.
When a sample is irradiated with flux, Φ thermal neutrons/cm2·s, it becomes activated; the activity, in counts per second, A, is given by Equation (1):
A = N · Φ · σ [ 1 e ( λ · t irradiation ) ]
where N is the number of atoms in the Au reference sample, σ thermal is the neutron absorption cross-section of 197Au (98.6 b) and tirradiation is the irradiation time. The mean lifetime λ relates to the half-life, t½ of the element via Equation (2):
λ = log e ( 2 ) t ½
Therefore, Φ can be calculated from the physical measurement of A from gamma spectroscopy using Equation (3):
Φ = A N · σ [ 1 e ( λ · t irradiation ) ]
The integral of activity (I) between the times t1 and t2 from the end of the irradiation (t = 0) is given by Equation (4):
I 0 = λ · A r e a e ( λ · t 1 ) e ( λ · t 2 )

4.4. Extraction of Tc from Mo in a Bulk Sample of Irradiated AHM Solution

The extraction of Tc isotopes from bulk Mo in an irradiated AHM solution was performed using a column of activated carbon (~1 g). The AHM solution was passed over the column, washed with approximately 1 bed volume of the background solvent, and the column containing sequestered Tc was isolated for subsequent measurement by gamma spectroscopy.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we demonstrate the production of 99Mo/99mTc and 101Mo/101Tc via neutron bombardment of an aqueous target of natural Mo. Although only relatively small quantities of these particular isotopes were produced under the rudimentary conditions tested, it is believed that improvements in experimental parameters, such as neutron flux, neutron moderation, target mass, target geometry, irradiation duration, extraction conditions, etc., would vastly enhance yields. The quantity of 99mTc and 101Tc using neutron generators over an infinite irradiation and isolation period has been extrapolated from this initial irradiation data set. With these data sets, the total number of neutron generators required to meet worldwide annual 99mTc need using a highly mobile, exportable, and non-fission-based system was estimated and the financial implications were presented. Because of the potential efficiency gain in using 101Tc for the same or similar imaging modalities and/or theranostics, the wide use of these systems is believed to be advantageous for the purpose of producing 99mTc or 101Tc without uranium, a nuclear reactor, or some more expensive, energy intensive, and less mobile accelerator such as a LINAC or cyclotron.

6. Patents

The work presented in this manuscript was validation for the patent under review: Mausolf, E. and Johnstone, E. (US/International Patent) Direct, Continuous Transmutation of Molybdenum (Mo) for the Production and Recovery of Technetium (Tc) and Ruthenium (Ru) using a Neutron Source, submitted 2018.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.J.M. and E.V.J.; methodology, E.J.M., E.V.J., D.L.W., E.Y.Z.G., C.K.G.; validation, E.J.M., D.L.W., E.Y.Z.G. and C.K.G.; formal analysis, E.J.M., E.V.J., D.L.W., E.Y.Z.G. and C.K.G.; investigation, E.J.M., D.L.W., E.Y.Z.G. and C.K.G.; resources, E.J.M., E.V.J. and C.K.G.; writing—original draft preparation, E.J.M., E.V.J., N.M. and D.L.W.; writing—review and editing, E.J.M., E.V.J., N.M. and D.L.W.; project administration, E.J.M., E.V.J.; funding acquisition, E.J.M., E.V.J. and C.K.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

N.M. acknowledges the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) for the funding of VESPA II joint project (02E11607B).

Conflicts of Interest

Adelphi Technology manufactures neutron generators of the type used in this research. IFS, LLC consults on topics related to radioisotope production, use, and disposal, particularly those used in this research.

References

  1. OECD/NEA. The Supply of Medical Isotopes: An Economic Diagnosis and Possible Solutions; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wolterbeek, B.; Kloosterman, J.L.; Lathouwers, D.; Rohde, M.; Winkelman, A.; Frima, L.; Wols, F. What is wise in the production of 99Mo? A comparison of eight possible production routes. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2014, 302, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gumiela, M. Cyclotron production of 99mTc: Comparison of known separation technologies for isolation of 99mTc from molybdenum targets. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2018, 58, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mayordomo, N.; Rodríguez, D.M.; Schild, D.; Molodtsov, K.; Johnstone, E.V.; Hübner, R.; Shams Azzam, S.A.; Brendler, V.; Müller, K. Technetium Retention by Gamma Alumina Nanoparticles and the Effect of Sorbed Fe2+. J. Hazard. 2020, 388, 122066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. World Nuclear News. Belgium to Recycle Residues from Isotope Production. 3 January 2019. Available online: https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Belgium-to-recycle-residues-from-isotope-productio (accessed on 5 March 2020).
  6. Brown, M.A. The Mo-99 Story. ANS Nuclear Café: All Things Nuclear. 24 April 2017. Available online: https://www.ans.org/news/article-1950/the-mo-99-story/ (accessed on 5 March 2020).
  7. Sadri, K.; Dabbagh, V.R.; Forghani, M.N.; Asadi, M.; Sadeghi, R. Lymphoscintigraphy in the Time of COVID-19: Effect of Molybdenum-99 Shortage on Feasibility of Sentinel Node Mapping. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2021, 19, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ponsard, B. Mo-99 supply issues: Report and lessons learned. ENS RRFM 2010 Transactions. In Proceedings of the 14th International Topical Meeting on the Research Reactor Fuel Management (RRFM 2010), Marrakech, Morocco, 21–25 March 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sharma, A.; Kumar, R. Medical radioisotopes availability: Time to look beyond the pandemic. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2021, 42, 711–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. World Nuclear News. HFR Shuts as Maria Joins Isotope Supply Chain. 22 February 2010. Available online: https://world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/HFR-shuts-as-Maria-joins-isotope-supply-chain (accessed on 5 March 2020).
  11. McGowan, M. Two Workers Exposed to Unsafe Radiation Dose at Lucas Heights Nuclear Facility. The Guardian, 24 June 2019. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jun/24/two-workers-exposed-to-unsafe-radiation-dose-at-lucas-heights-nuclear-facility(accessed on 5 March 2020).
  12. Fleming, R.M.; Fleming, M.R.; Chaudhuri, T.K. Holding Big Pharma Accountable. Open J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2019, 4, 001–003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Freeman, L.M. And Then There Was One: Comments on the Price Rise for MAA and DTPA. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 9N–11N. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Green, J. Reactors, Radioisotopes, and the HIFAR Controversy. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones, A.G.; Abrams, M.; Davidson, A.; Brodack, J.W.; Toothaker, A.K. Biological studies of a new class of technetium complexes: The hexakis(alkylisonitrile) technetium (I) cations. Int. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1984, 11, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. IAEA Live Chart of Nuclides. Available online: https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html (accessed on 11 March 2020).
  17. Nakano, T.; Sakai, M.; Torikai, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Noda, S.E.; Yamaguchi, M.; Takeda, S.; Nagao, Y.; Kikuchi, M.; Odaka, H.; et al. Imaging of 99mTc-DMSA and 18F-FDG in humans using a Si/CdTe Compton camera. Phys. Med. Biol. 2019, 65, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sharir, T.; Slomka, P. Dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: Past, present, and future. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 2018, 25, 2024–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Welch, M.J.; Kilbourn, M.R. A remote system for the routine production of oxygen-15 radiopharmaceuticals. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 1985, 22, 1193–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gedcke, D.A. How Counting Statistics Controls Detection Limits and Peak Precision, Ortec® Application Note AN59. 2009. Available online: https://www.ortec-online.com/service-and-support/library/application-notes (accessed on 5 August 2021).
  21. Saptiama, I.; Lestari, E.; Sarmini, E.; Lubis, H.; Marlina, M.; Mutalib, A. Development of 99Mo/99mTc generator system for production of medical radionuclide 99mTc using a neutron-activated 99Mo and zirconium based material (ZBM) as its adsorbent. Atom. Indones. 2016, 42, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mausolf, E.; Johnstone, E. Direct, Continuous Transmutation of Molybdenum (Mo) for the Production and Recovery of Technetium (Tc) and Ruthenium (Ru) Using a Neutron Source. US/International Patent 2018. under view. [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnstone, E.V.; Czerwinski, K.R.; Hartmann, T.; Poineau, F.; Bailey, D.J.; Hyatt, N.C.; Mayordomo, N.; Nuñez, A.; Tsang, F.Y.; Sattelberger, A.P.; et al. Calcium molybdate, CaMoO4: A promising target material for 99mTc and its potential applications in nuclear medicine and nuclear waste disposition. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Technetium and Rhenium—Science and Utilization, Moscow, Russia, 3–6 October 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gerasimov, A.S.; Kiselev, G.V. Production of Mo-99 in research reactors with the use of uranium targets and Mo-98 targets. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Isotopes, Sydney, Australia, 12–16 October 1997. [Google Scholar]
  25. Toth, J.J.; Pierson, B.D.; Painter, C.L.; Greenwood, L.R.; Burns, K.A.; Love, E.F.; Soderquist, C.Z.; Lavender, C.A.; Wall, D.E.; Wittman, R.S. Production of Molybdenum-99 Using Neutron Capture Methods; Technical report; PNNL-19895, RPT-59331-01 Rev 0; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL): Richmond, WA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lamson, M.; Hotte, C.E.; Ice, R.D. Practical Generator Kinetics. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 1976, 4, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  27. IAEA. Cyclotrons—What They Are and Where You Can Find Them. 27 January 2021. Available online: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/cyclotrons-what-are-they-and-where-can-you-find-them (accessed on 6 August 2021).
  28. Piestrup, M.A.; Brown, C.M.; Cremer, J.T., Jr.; Gary, C.K.; Williams, D.L.; Chen, A.X.; Jones, G.E., Jr.; Guan, Y.Z.; Urdahl, R.S.; Amoroso, A.N. Neutron Source with Beam Shaping Apparatus for Radiography. US Patent 10,955,365, 23 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
  29. Piestrup, M.A.; Brown, C.M.; Chen, A.X.; Gary, C.K.; Guan, Y.Z.; Horii, Y.; Jones, E.J., Jr.; Kokubo, Y.; Yamada, N.; Komura, S. Neutron Source for Neutron Capture Therapy. US Patent 10,874,881 B2, 29 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
  30. Watterson, J.I.W. A Review of Accelerator Based Neutron Sources and Their Applications; IAEA-TECDOC-1153, IAEA Technical Report; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chowdhury, P.; Benmerrouche, M. Radiological safety considerations of a 40 kW 35 MeV electron linear accelerator at the Canadian Light Source. In Proceedings of the RadSynch 13, Upton, NY, USA, 8–10 May 2013; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  32. Borio di Tigliole, A.; Cammi, A.; Chiesa, D.; Clemenza, M.; Manera, S.; Nastasi, M.; Pattavina, L.; Ponciroli, R.; Pozzi, S.; Prata Previtali, M.; et al. TRIGA reactor absolute neutron flux measurement using activated isotopes. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2014, 70, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. NTI Article, NTI (Nuclear Threat Initiative), 1776 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006). 1 August 2011. Available online: https://www.nti.org/learn/facilities/8/ (accessed on 7 August 2021).
  34. CPI Inflation Calculator. Available online: https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1972?amount=270000 (accessed on 7 August 2021).
  35. Ross, C.; Galea, R.; Saull, P.; Davidson, W.; Brown, P.; Brown, D.; Harvey, J.; Messina, G.; Wassenaar, R.; de Jong, M. Using the 100Mo photoneutron reaction to meet Canada’s requirement of 99mTc. Phys. Can. 2010, 66, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  36. CBC News. FAQ: Cyclotrons. 2009. Available online: https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/faq-cyclotrons-1.789206 (accessed on 7 August 2021).
  37. Otake, Y. RIKEN accelerator-driven compact neutron source, RANS and neutron application. In Proceedings of the 26th International Seminar on Interaction Neutrons Nuclei, Xi’an, China, 28 May–1 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ito, K.; Yachidate, A.; Akiba, K. Sorption of technetium on activated carbon. CYRIC Ann. Rep. 1986, 1986, 118–120. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ito, K. Variation of pertechnetate ion adsorption on activated carbons from different sources. CYRIC Ann. Rep. 1991, 1991, 99–101. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ito, K.; Akiba, K. Adsorption of pertechnetate ion on active carbon from acids and their salt solutions. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1991, 152, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Holm, E.; Gäfvert, T.; Lindhal, P.; Roos, P. In situ sorption of technetium using activated carbon. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2000, 53, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gu, B.; Dowlen, K.E.; Liang, L.; Clausen, J.L. Efficient separation and recovery of technetium-99 from contaminated groundwater. Sep. Technol. 1996, 6, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Byrnes, M.E.; Mavis, J.; Rossi, A.; Tortoso, A. Potential use of activated carbon to recover Tc-99 from 200 West Area groundwater as an alternative to more expensive resins, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington. In Proceedings of the WM2010: Waste Management Symposia, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 7–11 March 2010. Hanford Report: HNF–42335–FP. [Google Scholar]
  44. Makarov, A.; Safonov, A.; Konevnik, Y.; Teterin, Y.; Maslakov, K.; Teterin, A.; Karaseva, Y.; German, K.; Zakharova, E. Activated carbon additives for technetium immobilization in bentonite-based engineered barriers for radioactive waste repositories. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, D.; Kaplan, D.; Knox, A.; Crapse, K.; Diprete, D. Aqueous 99Tc, 129I, and 137Cs removal from contaminated groundwater and sediments using highly-effective low-cost sorbents. J. Environ. Radioact. 2014, 136, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jang, J.; Uesaka, M.; Tatenuma, K.; Tsuguchi, A.; Seikimoto, S.; Ohtsuki, T. Photonuclear production of Mo-99 / Tc-99m using molybdenum trioxide and activated carbon. In Proceedings of the Mo-99 Topical Meeting 2017, Montreal, QC, Canada, 10–13 September 2017. S9–P3. [Google Scholar]
  47. Petrovic, D.; Dukic, A.; Kumric, K.; Babic, B.; Momcilovic, M.; Ivanovic, N.; Matovic, L. Mechanism of Sorption of Pertechnetate onto ordered mesoporous carbon. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2014, 302, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ravi, A.; Oshchepkov, A.S.; German, K.E.; Kirakosyan, G.A.; Safonov, A.V.; Khrustalev, V.N.; Kataev, E.A. Finding a receptor design for selective recognition of perrhenate and pertechnetate: Hydrogen vs. halogen bonding. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 4826–4829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Galamboš, M.; Dano, M.; Vigašlová, E.; Krivosudsky, L.; Rosskopfová, O.; Novák, I.; Berek, D.; Rajec, P. Effect of competing anions on pertechnetate adsorption by activated carbon. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 304, 1219–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Daňo, M.; Viglašová, E.; Galamboš, M.; Rajec, P.; Novák, I. Sorption behaviour of pertechnetate on oxidized and reduced surface of activated carbon. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2017, 314, 2219–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rajec, P.; Galambos, M.; Dano, M.; Rosskopfova, O.; Caplovicova, M.; Hudec, P.; Hornaek, M.; Novak, I.; Berek, D.; Caplovic, L. Preparation and characterization of adsorbent based on carbon for pertechnetate adsorption. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 303, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mahmudov, R.; Huang, C.P. Selective adsorption of oxyanions on activated carbon exemplified by Filtrasorb 400 (F400). Sep. Purif. Tech. 2011, 77, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cruywagen, J.J. Protonation, oligomerization, and condensation reactions of vanadate (V), molybdate (VI), and tungstate (VI). Adv. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 49, 127–182. [Google Scholar]
  54. Bettinardi, D.J.; Paulenova, A.; Tkac, P. Speciation of molybdenum(VI) in chloride media at elevated Mo concentrations. ACS Omega. 2020, 5, 23786–23792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Muruchi, L.; Schaeffer, N.; Passos, H.; Mendonça, C.M.N.; Coutinho, J.A.P.; Jimenez, Y.P. Sustainable extraction and separation of rhenium and molybdenum from model copper mining effluents using a polymeric aqueous two-phase system. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 1778–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Śmiechowski, M.; Persson, I. Hydradtion of oxometallate ions in aqueous solution. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 8231–8239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pagnanelli, F.; Ferella, F.; De Michelis, I.; Veligo, M. Adsorption onto activated carbon for molybdenum recovery from leach liquors of exhausted hydrotreating catalysts. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 110, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kimura, M.; Gotou, C.; Tani, M. Separation and preconcentration of molybdenum(VI) ions in aqueous solution using activated carbon as a collector; Determination of molybdenum(VI) in tap-water, river-water and seawater. Bunseki Kagaku 1989, 38, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Hamed, M.; Rizik, H.; Ahmed, I. Adsorption behaviour of zirconium and molybdenum from nitric acid medium using low-cost adsorbent. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 249, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Seo, Y.S.; Choi, S.W.; Yang, T.J.; Kim, M.J.; Tran, T. Recovery of rhenium and molybdenum from a roaster fume scrubbing liquor by adsorption using activated carbon. Hydrometallurgy 2012, 129–130, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. El-Bayoumy, S.; El-Kolaly, M. Some radiochemical studies on the adsorption behaviour of molybdenum-99 on silver-coasted carbon granules and activated carbon. J. Radioanal. Chem. 1982, 68, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Viglasova, E.; Dano, M.; Galambos, M.; Rosskopfova, O.; Rajec, P.; Novak, I. Column studies for the separation of 99mTc using activated carbon. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2016, 307, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tatenuma, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Tsugugchi, A.; Komatsuzaki, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Tanaka, A.; Kurosawa, K.; Uehara, T.; Higaki, Y.; Hanaoka, H.; et al. A mass-production process for highly-pure medical use 99mTc from natural isotopic Mo(n, γ)99Mo without using uranium. Radioisotopes 2014, 63, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Tatenuma, K.; Tsuguchi, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Ishikawa, K. Generator of highly concentrated pure 99mTc from low specific activity 99Mo produced by reactor and/or electron accelerator. In Proceedings of the Mo-99 2016 Topical Meetings on Molybdenum-99 Technological Development, St. Louis, MO, USA, 11–14 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  65. Tatenuma, K.; Ueda, T.; Kurosawa, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Tanaka, A.; Noguchi, T.; Arano, Y. Method of Recovering Enriched Radioactive Technetium and System Therefor. US Patent 9236153–B2, 12 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yang, G.; Hu, J. An automated 99mTc generator device using low specific activity 99Mo. J. Nucl. Med. 2018, 59 (Suppl. 1), 1039. [Google Scholar]
  67. Song, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, N.; Guo, H.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, H.; Gao, X. Extracting technetium from neutral molybdenum solution with activated carbon fiber. J. Isot. China 2021, 34, 133–140. [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang, Y.; Song, Z.; Wang, N.; Guo, H.; Zhao, H.; Gao, X. Activated carbon fiber as matrix for three-column selectivity inversion 99Mo–99mTc generator. J. Isot. China 2021, 34, 120–126. [Google Scholar]
  69. Notni, J.; Wester, H.J. Re-thinking the role of radiometal isotopes: Towards a future concept for theranostic radiopharmaceuticals. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2018, 61, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Qaim, S.M.; Scholten, B.; Neumaier, B. New developments in the production of theranostic pairs of radionuclides. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 318, 1493–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Johnstone, E.V.; Yates, M.A.; Poineau, F.P.; Sattelberger, A.P.; Czerwinski, K.R. Technetium: The first radioelement on the Periodic Table. J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tavares, A.A.S.; Tavares, J.M.R.S. 99mTc Auger electrons for target tumor therapy: A review. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2010, 86, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bigott, H.M.; Mccarthy, D.W.; Wüst, F.R.; Dahlheimer, J.L.; Piwnica-Worms, D.R.; Welch, M.J. Production, processing and uses of 94mTc. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2001, 44, S119–S121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hayakawa, T.; Hatsukawa, Y.; Tanimori, T. 95gTc and 96gTc as alternatives to medical radioisotope 99mTc. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Gott, M.D.; Hayes, C.R.; Wycoff, D.E.; Balkin, E.R.; Smith, B.E.; Pauzauskie, P.J.; Fassbender, M.E.; Cutler, C.S.; Ketring, A.R.; Wilbur, D.S.; et al. Accelerator-based production of the 99mTc-186Re diagnostic-therapeutic pair using metal disulfide targets (MoS2, WS2, OsS2). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2016, 114, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Hashimoto, K.; Yoshihara, K. Rhenium complexes labeled with 186,188Re for nuclear medicine. In Technetium and Rhenium Their Chemistry and Its Applications; Yoshihara, K., Omori, T., Eds.; Topics in Current Chemistry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; Volume 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Alberto, R.; Braband, H.; Nadeem, Q. Bioorganometallic technetium and rhenium chemistry: Fundamentals for applications. Chimia 2020, 74, 953–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Chotkowski, M.; Czerwiński, A. Electrochemistry of Technetium; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Poineau, F.; Johnstone, E.V.; Czerwinski, K.R.; Sattelberger, A.P. Recent advances in technetium halide chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Qaim, S.M. Therapeutic nuclides and nuclear data. Radiochim. Acta. 2001, 89, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Gudkov, S.V.; Shilyagina, N.Y.; Vodeneev, V.A.; Zvygin, A.V. Target radionuclide therapy for tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Morgenstern, A.; Lebeda, O.; Stursa, J.; Bruchertseifer, F.; Capote, R.; McGinley, J.; Rasmussen, G.; Sin, M.; Zielinska, B.; Apostolidis, C. Production of 230U/226Th for targeted alpha therapy via proton irradiation of 231Pa. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 8763–8770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Metebi, A.; Nayback, C.; Fan, J.; Johnson, N.; Diemer, J.; Grimm, T.; Zamiara, M.; Zinn, K. Therapeutic Efficacy of Pb-214-labeled Trastuzumab in a Preclinical Model of Ovarian Cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2021, 62 (Suppl. 1), 93. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ferrier, M.G.; Li, Y.; Chyan, M.; Wong, R.; Li, L.; Spreckelmeyer, S.; Hamlin, D.K.; Mastren, T.; Fassbender, M.E.; Orvig, C.; et al. Thorium chelators for targeted alpha therapy: Rapid chelation of thorium-226. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2020, 63, 502–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pillai, M.R.A.; Dash, A.; Knapp, F.F. Sustained Availability of 99mTc: Possible Paths Forward. J. Nucl. Med. 2013, 54, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Nagai, Y. Production scheme for diagnostic-therapeutic radioisotopes by accelerator neutrons. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B. 2021, 97, 292–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lapereur, N.; Lacoeuille, F.; Bouvry, C.; Hindre, F.; Garcion, E.; Cherel, M.; Noiret, N.; Garin, E.; Russ Knapp, F.F., Jr. Rhenium-188 labeled radiopharmaceuticals: Current clinical applications in oncology and promising prospectives. Front. Med. 2019, 6, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Ceccarelli, C.; Bianchi, F.; Trippi, D.; Di Martino, F.; Satini, P.; Elisei, R.; Pinchera, A. Location of functioning metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma by simultaneous double isotope acquisition of I-131 whole body scan and bone scan. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2004, 27, 866–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kotb, M.H.; Omar, W.; El-Maghraby, T.; El-Bedwihy, M.; El-Tawdy, M.; Mustafa, H.; Al-Nahhas, A. The value of simultaneous co-registration of 99mTc-MDP and 131Iodine in metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Nucl. Med. Rev. 2007, 10, 98–105. [Google Scholar]
  90. Vogel, W.V.; van der Marck, S.C.; Versleijen, M.W.J. Challenges and future options for the production of lutetium-177. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Abram, U.; Alberto, R. Technetium and rhenium: Coordination chemistry and nuclear medical applications. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2006, 17, 1486–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Badria, F.A. Radiopharmaceuticals: On-Going Research for Better Diagnosis, Therapy, Environmental, and Pharmaceutical Applications. IntechOpen 2021. Online First. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Xu, T.; Vorobyeva, A.; Schulga, A.; Konovalova, E.; Vorontsova, O.; Ding, H.; Gräslund, T.; Tashireva, L.A.; Orlova, A.; Tolmachev, V.; et al. Imaging-Guided Therapy Simultaneously Targeting HER2 and EpCAM with Trastuzumab and EpCAM-Directed Toxin Provides Additive Effect in Ovarian Cancer Model. Cancers 2021, 13, 3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Adelphi Technologies Inc. Available online: https://www.adelphitech.com/ (accessed on 20 June 2021).
Figure 1. (a) Diagrammatic sketch of the irradiation time and isotope production, and (b) HPGE detector experimental setup and sample in a polypropylene container.
Figure 1. (a) Diagrammatic sketch of the irradiation time and isotope production, and (b) HPGE detector experimental setup and sample in a polypropylene container.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00875 g001
Figure 2. Characteristic peaks for 99Mo are shown in green, 101Mo in black, and 101Tc in purple. Peaks attributed from background contribution are shown in grey.
Figure 2. Characteristic peaks for 99Mo are shown in green, 101Mo in black, and 101Tc in purple. Peaks attributed from background contribution are shown in grey.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00875 g002
Figure 3. Gamma-ray emission from an irradiated molybdenum-containing sample for which the extraction process was not performed. (a) Counts in the 739 keV line from 99Mo as a function of time, and (b) counts in the 141 keV line of 99mTc as a function of time, (c) counts in the 307 keV line for 101Tc (purple) and 192 keV for 101Mo (black).
Figure 3. Gamma-ray emission from an irradiated molybdenum-containing sample for which the extraction process was not performed. (a) Counts in the 739 keV line from 99Mo as a function of time, and (b) counts in the 141 keV line of 99mTc as a function of time, (c) counts in the 307 keV line for 101Tc (purple) and 192 keV for 101Mo (black).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00875 g003
Figure 4. Total counts of 99Mo/99mTc following decay of 101Mo/101Tc from Figure 5 after an 18-h intermediate decay period. The 778 keV line is shown for 99Mo (green) and the 141 keV line for 99mTc (blue). Associated error bars are shown in black.
Figure 4. Total counts of 99Mo/99mTc following decay of 101Mo/101Tc from Figure 5 after an 18-h intermediate decay period. The 778 keV line is shown for 99Mo (green) and the 141 keV line for 99mTc (blue). Associated error bars are shown in black.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00875 g004
Figure 5. (a) Extraction immediately following irradiation yielding 101Tc (purple) with residual 101Mo (black). (b) Extraction after a day of the same irradiated AHM solution yielding only 99mTc (blue). Peaks arising from background contributions are shown in grey.
Figure 5. (a) Extraction immediately following irradiation yielding 101Tc (purple) with residual 101Mo (black). (b) Extraction after a day of the same irradiated AHM solution yielding only 99mTc (blue). Peaks arising from background contributions are shown in grey.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00875 g005
Table 1. Production yield of 99Mo and 99mTc using a neutron generator outputting 2 × 1010 n/s as a function of time. The model assumes complete neutron consumption and transmutation of 98Mo to 99Mo within the Mo target and concurrent production of 99mTc.
Table 1. Production yield of 99Mo and 99mTc using a neutron generator outputting 2 × 1010 n/s as a function of time. The model assumes complete neutron consumption and transmutation of 98Mo to 99Mo within the Mo target and concurrent production of 99mTc.
Time (h)Activity (Bq)
Mo-99
Activity (Bq)
Tc-99m
12.09 × 1082.02 × 107
244.46 × 1093.70 × 109
1681.66 × 10101.47 × 1010
3301.94 × 10101.72 × 1010
Table 2. Comparison of 99mTc dose output (740 MBq) for a neutron generator (2 × 1010 n/s) for the standard commercial 99Mo/99mTc generator production model after 1-week of irradiation (A0 = 16.6 GBq), whereby the target is decoupled from the source of production, versus continuous production at saturation (~5-half-lives; Asaturation = 19.4 GBq), where only the 99mTc is removed from the irradiated target. Assumptions do not account for 99mTc at EOB, generator elution efficiency, nor decay losses due to processing.
Table 2. Comparison of 99mTc dose output (740 MBq) for a neutron generator (2 × 1010 n/s) for the standard commercial 99Mo/99mTc generator production model after 1-week of irradiation (A0 = 16.6 GBq), whereby the target is decoupled from the source of production, versus continuous production at saturation (~5-half-lives; Asaturation = 19.4 GBq), where only the 99mTc is removed from the irradiated target. Assumptions do not account for 99mTc at EOB, generator elution efficiency, nor decay losses due to processing.
Time (Days)Commercial Generator (Doses)Continuous Generator (Doses)Efficiency Gain (%)
1152244
552110112
760154157
1491308238
Table 3. Estimated production yields and dose requirements associated with 99mTc and 101Tc based on 40,000,000 doses per annum (109,589 doses per day) as a function of generator neutron output and Mo target isotopic composition under continuous operation. A ratio factor of 1:10 99mTc to 101Tc was used to estimate doses of 101Tc.
Table 3. Estimated production yields and dose requirements associated with 99mTc and 101Tc based on 40,000,000 doses per annum (109,589 doses per day) as a function of generator neutron output and Mo target isotopic composition under continuous operation. A ratio factor of 1:10 99mTc to 101Tc was used to estimate doses of 101Tc.
Generator Flux2 × 1010 n/s2 × 1012 n/s
Tc Isotope Produced99mTc101Tc99mTc101Tc
Mo TargetNat. Mo98MoNat. Mo100MoNat. Mo98MoNat. Mo100Mo
Doses Generated per day522532205342200534422,000
Generators Required21,9184981206829820550215
Table 4. Example neutron sources [30,31,32] with estimates of yields and system costs.
Table 4. Example neutron sources [30,31,32] with estimates of yields and system costs.
TypeEstimate of Beam Energy (MeV)Approximate Yield Range (n/s)Approximate System Cost, Order of Magnitude ($M)
Reactor *Not applicable>1017~1000
Electron Accelerator with Photoneutron Converter30–405 × 1013 to 1 × 101410
Cyclotron 10–18.05.7 × 1012 to 2.1 × 10141–10
RFQ Linac §1.5–3.01 × 1011 to 1.3 × 10121
D-D Neutron Generator0.1–0.21 × 108 to 1 × 10110.1–1
* TRIGA reactor $270,000 in 1972 [33], adjusting for inflation is $1.72B in 2021 [34]. Financial figures based on 35 MeV, 100 kW electron accelerator described in Ref. [35]. Financial figures based on Ref. [36]. § Financial figures based on Ref. [37].
Table 5. Comparison of nuclear data for commercial radioisotopes used for therapeutic/theranostic applications [87] with 101Tc.
Table 5. Comparison of nuclear data for commercial radioisotopes used for therapeutic/theranostic applications [87] with 101Tc.
IsotopeHalf-LifeEgamma (keV)Ebeta (keV)Tissue Penetration Range (mm)Uses
89Sr50.5 dN/A587.10 (99.9%)8TRT 1-osseous metastases
90Y64.00 hN/A933.7
(99.9%)
12TRT-hepatic malignancies, lymphoma
131I8.02 d284.3 (6.1%), 364.48 (81.5%), 636.98 (7.2%)191.58 (89.6%), 96.62 (7.2%)2.4Diagnostic imaging (SPECT); TRT: thyroid ablation, neuroendocrine tumors, prostate seeds
177Lu6.647 d208.36 (10.4%)149.35 (79.4%), 47.66 (11.6%)2.2Diagnostic imaging (SPECT); TRT: PRRT 2, bone pain palliation, synovectomy, neuroendocrine, metastatic prostate, etc.
186Re3.72 d137.16 (9.5%)359.2 (71.0%), 306.1 (21.5%)4.5Bone pain palliation, synovectomy, endovascular irrad.
188Re17.01 h155.04 (15.5%)795.41 (70.7%), 728.88 (25.8%)11Bone pain palliation, synovectomy, endovascular irrad.
223Ra *11.43 d~82.0 (<2.0%)492.5 (99.7%), 471.3 (91.3%), 172.9 (0.3%)-Bone metastasises
225Ac *9.920 d218.0 (11.4%), 440.45 (25.9%), 1567.1 (99.7%)660.34 (97.4%), 492.2 (65.9%), 197.4 (100%), 93.4 (68.8%)-Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
101Tc14.22 min306.8 (89%), 545 (5.9%)487 (90%), 385 (6%), 127.2 (2.64%)N/AN/A
1 TRT = targeted radionuclide therapy; 2 PRRT = peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. * Primarily ⍺-decay, yet exhibit multiple decay modes, i.e., β, and γ, and daughter products; for comparison only β and γ reported from decay chain
Table 6. Measured isotopes and emission lines of interest with corresponding detector efficiencies.
Table 6. Measured isotopes and emission lines of interest with corresponding detector efficiencies.
IsotopeEnergy of Key Line (keV)Half-LifeDetector Efficiency (%)
101Mo19214.61 m9.4 ± 1
101Tc30714.22 m6.6 ± 0.7
99Mo77865.924 h3.3 ± 0.3
99mTc1416.001 h11.8 ± 1.5
198Au4112.697 d5.4 ± 0.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mausolf, E.J.; Johnstone, E.V.; Mayordomo, N.; Williams, D.L.; Guan, E.Y.Z.; Gary, C.K. Fusion-Based Neutron Generator Production of Tc-99m and Tc-101: A Prospective Avenue to Technetium Theranostics. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090875

AMA Style

Mausolf EJ, Johnstone EV, Mayordomo N, Williams DL, Guan EYZ, Gary CK. Fusion-Based Neutron Generator Production of Tc-99m and Tc-101: A Prospective Avenue to Technetium Theranostics. Pharmaceuticals. 2021; 14(9):875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090875

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mausolf, Edward J., Erik V. Johnstone, Natalia Mayordomo, David L. Williams, Eugene Yao Z. Guan, and Charles K. Gary. 2021. "Fusion-Based Neutron Generator Production of Tc-99m and Tc-101: A Prospective Avenue to Technetium Theranostics" Pharmaceuticals 14, no. 9: 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090875

APA Style

Mausolf, E. J., Johnstone, E. V., Mayordomo, N., Williams, D. L., Guan, E. Y. Z., & Gary, C. K. (2021). Fusion-Based Neutron Generator Production of Tc-99m and Tc-101: A Prospective Avenue to Technetium Theranostics. Pharmaceuticals, 14(9), 875. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14090875

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop