Next Article in Journal
Antiplatelet Aggregation Properties of Cirsilineol: A Novel Inhibitor of Blood Coagulation Factor Xa
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Recent Pharmacological Advances in the Management of Diabetes-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy
Previous Article in Journal
Betulinic Acid-Brosimine B Hybrid Compound Has a Synergistic Effect with Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Cell Line, Modulating Apoptosis and Autophagy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kaurenoic Acid Reduces Ongoing Chronic Constriction Injury-Induced Neuropathic Pain: Nitric Oxide Silencing of Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 16
Issue 4
10.3390/ph16040587
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Peripheral Neuropathy in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases—Diagnosis and Treatment

by
Jean Marcos De Souza
1,
Thiago Junqueira Trevisan
2,
Samara Rosa Sepresse
3,4,
Ana Carolina Londe
3,5,
Marcondes Cavalcante França Júnior
6 and
Simone Appenzeller
2,3,*
1
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas 13083881, Brazil
2
Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, School of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas 13084971, Brazil
3
Autoimmunity Laboratory, School of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas 13083881, Brazil
4
Graduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, School of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas 13083881, Brazil
5
Post-Graduate Program in Physiopathology, School of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas 13083881, Brazil
6
Department of Neurology, School of Medical Science, University of Campinas, Campinas 13083888, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(4), 587; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040587
Submission received: 14 February 2023 / Revised: 3 April 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 14 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in the Pharmacology of Peripheral Neuropathy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is frequently observed in systemic rheumatic diseases and is a challenge in clinical practice. We aimed to review the evidence on the subject and proposed a comprehensive approach to these patients, facilitating diagnosis and management. We searched the MEDLINE database for the terms (and its respective Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms): “peripheral neuropathy” AND “rheumatic diseases” OR “systemic lupus erythematosus”, “rheumatoid arthritis”, “Sjogren syndrome”, and “vasculitis” from 2000 to 2023. This literature review focuses on the diagnostic workup of PNs related to systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic vasculitis. For every type of PN, we provide a pragmatic flowchart for diagnosis and also describe evidence-based strategies of treatment.

1. Introduction

Rheumatic diseases represent a vast group of immune-mediated inflammatory conditions including autoimmune connective tissue diseases and systemic vasculitides. Neurologic manifestations are a hallmark of many of these entities due to many types of inflammatory attack on neuronal tissue, and also due to nerve entrapment, drug toxicity, and metabolic vasculopathy. Because the pathogenic mechanisms of inflammatory neuropathies are still somewhat obscure and many of them are at least partially reversible, great attention is usually paid to recognizing the immune-mediated neuropathies in the rheumatic patient.
One of the most common neurologic manifestations of the immune-mediated rheumatic diseases is peripheral neuropathy (PN) [1]. It is especially recognized in Sjögren syndrome (SS), occurring in up to 60% of patients [2], systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in up to 15% [3,4], and systemic vasculitis, in up to 70% [5]. The patterns of clinical presentation are diverse, with different neurological syndromes occurring in the same disease, making it very challenging for most practitioners not only to attribute the PN to inflammation itself but also to determine the specific topography of the insult. Because some treatments may differ depending on the type of PN [6], it is of utmost interest for the clinician to be able to understand as best as possible the clinical picture.
This literature review focuses on the diagnostic workup of PNs related to SLE, SS, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic vasculitis. For every type of PN, we also describe strategies of treatment.

2. Methodology

We searched the MEDLINE database for the terms (and its respective Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms): “peripheral neuropathy” AND “rheumatic diseases” OR “systemic lupus erythematosus”, “rheumatoid arthritis”, “Sjogren syndrome”, and “vasculitis”.
The search strategy was performed on 6 January 2023 and included review articles from 2000 to 2023, published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. Instead of describing the neuropathies related to each rheumatic disease (something that was already and successfully carried out before) [1], we decided to start from the neurologic syndromes aiming to narrow the diagnosis down to the main rheumatic conditions. Given a specific neurological syndrome, we described the most probable associated rheumatic conditions and a reasonable diagnostic flow.
Furthermore, treatment options are provided for each rheumatic-disease-associated PN.

3. Review

Notably, some authors used a classification of neuropathies distinct from the one we used in this review. Especially in SS, some authors used the term “nonataxic sensory neuropathy” for the group comprising sensory polyneuropathy (without ataxia), pure small fiber neuropathy and trigeminal neuropathy [7,8]. Nevertheless, the same entities are covered.

3.1. Small Fiber Neuropathy

Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is characterized by the degeneration of thinly myelinated A-delta fibers and unmyelinated C-fibers, sparing the thicker fibers related to motor functions, vibration, and proprioception [9,10]. Increased awareness has led to an increased frequency of SFN being reported in the past years [11]. In rheumatic disorders, the hypothesized pathogeneses include direct damage to the nerve axons by cytokines [12], antibodies [9], or cytotoxic cells [13].
Patients most often complain of pain with neuropathic features (e.g., burning, itchy, or prickling in quality) in the distal surface of feet. The pain is usually constant but may be worsened by light stimuli, such as the rubbing of clothes in the affected areas. As the disease progresses, the pain tends to ascend proximally towards the knees, and eventually the same process can be seen in the hands ascending to the elbows [10]. The loss of thermal sensation and numbness are also reported [9]. Although most patients present this symmetric phenotype, some patients might experience patchy, asymmetric, and proximal islets of symptoms in the trunk, face, scalp, or tongue [9,14]. In the latter, the topography of injury is presumably the dorsal root ganglia’s thin fibers [1]. Because thin fibers carry most of the visceral autonomic innervation, patients may also present with autonomic dysfunction, expressed by postural hypotension or tachycardia, bowel disturbances, sweating complaints, and sexual dysfunction [10,11].
The physical examination most frequently reveals a patient with pinprick and thermal sensation loss and preserved motor functions, coordination, deep reflexes, and discriminative touch [10].
The confirmation of SFN is challenging because nerve conduction studies are typically normal. “Quantitative sensory testing” (QST) is the broad name for quantitative methods to assess all forms of sensation through parametrized physical examination and measurement tools [10,15]. It can be used for the diagnosis of SFN because it is capable of discriminating the forms of sensation carried by thin and thick fibers. Nevertheless, QST is a psychophysical test and may depend on patient cognition and collaboration to be reliable.
The use of a skin biopsy to count intra-epidermal nerve fiber density is probably the most used and studied method for the diagnosis of SFN [16]. For diagnostic purposes, patients with SFN have a decrease in intra-epidermal nerve fiber density [17]. Techniques involving evoked potentials (EP) can also be used for the evaluation of SFN, with variable availability depending on the scenario. Pain-related EP, for instance, can be obtained by the selective electrical stimulation of superficial layers of the dermis [18]. This method can be used to grasp the activity from A-delta-fibers and has been successfully tested in diabetes-related SFN [19]. Another possibility to isolate thin fibers is laser EP, in which short heat pulses are emitted from a CO2 laser on the skin. The delay in EP has been described and standardized, being long for A-delta and even longer for C fibers [9]. The method is probably also useful for the diagnosis of SFN [20] but is not widely available, and its particularities might make C fibers difficult to isolate [9]. Finally, contact heat EP relies on the application of a very precise and fast method of delivering high temperatures of up to 70 °C to the skin [9,21]. The method is safe and standardized values have already been tested [22], but extensive research on the accuracy for SFN is still lacking.
Up to 30% of patients with SFN might have SS [23], making it the most likely rheumatologic disorder to which SFN is related by far. In SLE, approximately 3% of patients will present with SFN [1,3,4]. Although SFN has been described in systemic vasculitis, it is almost always associated with significant nerve damage so is categorized into the groups of more severe polyneuropathies. Finally, most studies with RA describe sensory polyneuropathy as a common feature, but SFN itself is scarcely appreciated [24,25]. This may be due to the difficult diagnostic framework of SFN, so that the real prevalence of it in RA is probably underestimated. Because RA is largely the most prevalent autoimmune rheumatic condition, it will be a frequent cause of SFN when the differentials departing from the neurological picture are considered [26].
Therefore, we suggest that SS, SLE, and RA are the rheumatic conditions that should be sought in a patient with SFN. Figure 1 highlights a diagnostic flowchart for patients with SFN and suspected autoimmune rheumatic disorder.

3.2. Treatment of SFN

The evidence on therapies regarding SFN is limited. However, studies so far regarding inflammatory forms of SFN highlight the unpromising results of immunosuppressive therapies, including glucocorticoids [8], immunoglobulin [8], and rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody related to the inhibition of B-lymphocytes [27]. In practical guidelines, the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) suggests only symptom control for the pure sensory neuropathy related to SS [6]. Considering symptomatic management, most guidelines suggest drugs utilized in neuropathic pain, such as gabapentin, pregabalin, tricyclic antidepressants, duloxetine, venlafaxine, topical lidocaine, and/or tramadol [10,28]. To the best of our knowledge, SFN itself has been evaluated only once in a controlled trial, with equal benefits from tramadol or gabapentin in relation to a placebo [29]. If pain control persistently fails or progressive/debilitating symptoms remain, we believe that, based on small case series, a trial of intravenous immunoglobulin (see Table 1 for suggested dosages) is the most promising approach [30].

3.3. Axonal Sensory Polyneuropathy (SPN) and Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy (SMPN)

In SPN/SMPN, aggression towards thicker axons, responsible for the transmission of motor functions, vibratory sensation, proprioception and light touch, is observed. By definition, these axonal disorders should lead to electrophysiologic findings of the reduced amplitude of action potentials without primary changes in conduction velocity [31].
SPN/SMPN are described as the most common peripheral neurologic manifestations of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases, occurring in 40% of RA [24,25], 30% of SS [7,32,33], 7% of SLE [3,34], and less than 10% of systemic vasculitis patients [35,36,37]. Some authors suggest that pure SPN could be associated with ganglion cell destruction by direct cytotoxic lymphocytes, representing the same pathogenesis of dorsal root ganglionopathy (ataxic sensory polyneuropathy) [8]. On the other hand, SMPN is a result of neural toxicity from inflammatory cytokines (including IL-1, IL-6, and TNF), nerve damage induced by autoantibodies, infiltration of nerve fibers by inflammatory cells, and/or vasculopathy [38,39,40].
The clinical picture is characterized by symmetric stocking-and-glove-pattern pain and/or dysesthesia, with slow progression towards the thighs and shoulders. Motor symptoms (weakness of fingers extensors and ankle dorsiflexors) emerge after sensory changes, and in the presence of proprioception deficits, are associated with frequent falls [38].
SPN/SMPN are confirmed with a nerve conduction study combined with needle electromyography, identifying a length-dependent decrease in sensory and motor action potentials in multiple nerves of the extremities [32,38,39]. Because secondary demyelination can be observed in immune-mediated rheumatic disease, the amplitude and velocity of action potentials can also be decreased [34,38,39,41,42].
Figure 2 synthetizes our stepwise proposed evaluation in patients presenting with SPN/SMPN suspecting immune-mediated rheumatic diseases.

3.4. Treatment of SNP/SMNP

The treatment for SPN and SMPN associated to rheumatic diseases lacks good-quality evidence and is based on small case series and retrospective studies. EULAR’s guideline for Sjögren syndrome suggests intravenous immunoglobulin as the first-line treatment for the motor forms of PN and neuropathic pain treatment (see above, in small fiber neuropathy section) for the nonataxic sensory polyneuropathies [6]. Methylprednisolone or cyclophosphamide are considered as second-line treatments [6]. A systematic review for SLE-associated PN reported similar treatments, including glucocorticoids in different dosages [43]. Because they were used frequently with other immunosuppressive drugs, it is hard to grasp their real efficiency. Nevertheless, EULAR recommends “glucocorticoids alone or in combination with immunosuppressive therapy” for SLE-PN. As for intravenous immunoglobulin, the previously mentioned systematic review reported good responses for all the five patients analyzed. No conclusions could be drawn from cyclophosphamide, and rituximab was effective in six out of the eight cases reported [43]. Finally, one retrospective study showed good results with azathioprine [34].
In RA, if there is evidence of disseminated vasculitis (i.e., rheumatoid vasculitis), treatment should consist of glucocorticoid and intravenous cyclophosphamide [44]. If SNP/SMNP is the only manifestation, treatment is extrapolated from the other conditions above.
For systemic vasculitis, particularly for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAVs), EULAR’s management guidelines do not list PN as a part of the life-threatening situations, suggesting therefore the combination of glucocorticoids (1 mg/kg; maximal 80 mg/kg/day) and methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil [45].
Our suggested approach involves evaluating patients for severity of the PN. For pure SPN with preserved deep sensation or only minor motor impairment, without an impact on daily living, we suggest the management of neuropathic pain and nonpharmacological strategies, such as physical therapy and acupuncture. These patients should be closely followed for disease progression. For patients with significant motor or deep sensation impairment, we suggest methylprednisolone alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide (Table 1).

3.5. Sensory Neuronopathy

This disabling and unusual form of PN is a consequence of the degeneration of the dorsal root ganglia neurons in multiple spinal and cranial levels. It is associated with malignancy, vitamin E deficiency, drugs (e.g., platinum-based chemotherapy), HIV infection, and neurodegenerative conditions [46,47]. When related to rheumatic conditions, SS is by far the most frequently associated disorder [48,49]. In immune-mediated sensory neuronopathies, the pathogenesis is usually well described, with the infiltration of dorsal root ganglia by cytotoxic CD8+ lymphocytes [50]. More recently, some autoantibodies were described in association with SS-related sensory neuronopathy, but their pathogenic role remains unclear [51].
The clinical manifestations include a multifocal and patchy sensory disorder, extending proximally and distally, with all the sensory modalities potentially compromised, often in an asymmetric manner or progression [47,52]. Large sensory fibers are prone to lesion and responsible for the development of proprioceptive ataxia and areflexia. Additionally, small fiber neuropathy occurs, with the neuropathic patterns discussed above. When autonomic nerve fibers are compromised, dysautonomia may be present [48].
The clinical suspicion of a sensory neuronopathy requires NCS and neuroimaging as confirmatory tests [53]. NCS usually shows decreased sensory action potentials’ amplitudes with normal velocity of conduction [48], without a distal predominance in most cases. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spinal cord shows hyperintense T2-weighted lesions at posterior columns.
SS should be considered as the first hypothesis in a patient presenting sensory neuronopathy. Because more than 50% of SS patients do not have sicca symptoms at the onset of sensory complaints [47], considering this connective tissue disease in the differential is crucial but not at all instinctive. On the other hand, patients with RA and SLE have been subjects for case reports or single cases in retrospective studies [47,54,55].
Thus, we suggest that SS should be sought in all patients without an obvious cause for sensory neuronopathy (e.g., paraneoplastic, viral, or drug-related), regardless of other ocular, articular, or mucocutaneous symptoms [56] (Figure 3).

3.6. Treatment of Sensory Neuronopathy

Sensory neuronopathies can be very disabling and early and aggressive treatment should be administered because of a narrow therapeutic window existing for a good response before irreversible damage to ganglia occurs [56,57]. Many reports that highlighted the benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin included patients with early treatment [58]. The benefit for patients with well-established and chronic disease is uncertain [59].
Most recommendations include the combination of glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin as the first-line treatment [58]. EULAR’s guidelines suggest methylprednisolone as a second-line option, after immunoglobulin, and cyclophosphamide as rescue therapy [6]. The use of other immunosuppressants is less well-documented. Some authors suggest mycophenolate mofetil [58,59] and rituximab [60] as viable options, based on small case series.
We suggest the combination of high-dose glucocorticoids (or intravenous methylprednisolone) combined with intravenous immunoglobulin for new-onset sensory neuronopathy, followed by mycophenolate as maintenance therapy (Table 1).

3.7. Multiple Mononeuritis (MM)

MM is thought to be the archetypal clinical presentation of nerve arteriolar obstruction [5]. The cessation of the nerve’s blood supply results in ischemic dysfunction, corresponding to the main functions of the affected nerve, usually with mixed (motor and sensory) deficits. Because most diseases causing MM are systemic, the pathogenic process most often involves other nerves, resulting in a summative pattern sometimes difficult to differentiate from PN [5,41]. Thus, MM can be defined as the simultaneous (although not always synchronous) impairment of at least two peripheral nerves [41].
The pathogenesis of MM includes damage to small arteries and large arterioles ranging approximately 75–300 μm in diameter [5]. They represent the epineural and perineural vessels of the nerves, usually invaded and destroyed by inflammatory cells and/or immune complexes, leading to necrotizing vasculitis and lumen occlusion [61,62].
The disease onset is acute for most patients, but a more prolonged course (more than 2 months of evolution) has been reported in up to 25% of cases [63]. The long nerves of the inferior limbs (e.g., peroneal, sural, and tibial nerves) are the most affected [41,63], but the arms and even cranial nerves are also well described [63]. Because the confluence of nerves can make the patient present with a somewhat symmetric pattern, the assessment for early asymmetry must be pursued [41]. Most cases of MM related to rheumatic conditions represent vasculitic neuropathy; thus, systemic symptoms such as fever, weight loss, and fatigue are frequent. Moreover, one should always seek other organs’ involvement, as it could be the case with hematuria, respiratory distress, and abdominal pain [5].
Considering specifically the neuropathy, the diagnosis is confirmed by NCS, electromyography (EMG), and nerve (and muscle) biopsy [63]. NCS/EMG usually shows an asymmetric axonal loss pattern (sensory and motor action potential’s amplitude reduction) [64]. The electrophysiological studies are important not only for suggesting the diagnosis but also to guide the biopsy because affected nerves probably yield a higher diagnostic accuracy [62]. Despite this, the involvement of nerves is patchy and up to 50% of the findings are not unequivocally diagnostic, supporting the contemporary concept that obtaining a concomitant muscle sample is appreciated when feasible [62,65]. Pathological findings include necrotizing vasculitis of epineural arterioles, mediated by neutrophils and/or monocytes [61]. In connective tissue diseases, concomitant infiltration of perineural space by inflammatory cells can be seen [41], and in SLE, complement and immune complex deposition can also be found [62]. When muscle is obtained, one typically sees the same vasculitic process, without myositis or overt muscle cell necrosis [62].
Because MM’s pathogenesis is so intrinsically linked to vasculitic phenomena, systemic vasculitides are the main diagnosis to pursue [41]. Considering that the vessels involved are those of the epineurium and perineurium, MM is usually associated with small to medium vessel vasculitides. Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is an uncommon disease, but it is remarkably associated with MM [37]; so we suggest always considering it in the differentials. Some entities classified by the Chapel Hill Consensus [66] as small vessel vasculitides can also have MM as a clinical manifestation, especially eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV) [5]. To a lesser extent, the other AAVs should be considered. Systemic autoimmune connective tissue diseases are more related to nerve microvasculitis [5] and most often will produce polyneuropathies [1], as discussed above. Nevertheless, MM in the context of systemic connective tissue diseases is well described and should be remembered. One exception, though, is rheumatoid vasculitis (RV). This entity is rare nowadays with the available pharmacological arsenal for RA because it is related to longstanding and poorly controlled disease [44]. The clinical picture is that of systemic symptoms (especially weight loss), skin ulcers, and MM, in the context of highly active seropositive RA [1,44]. MM can occur in up to 50% of cases [4], so, despite RV being an unusual manifestation of RA, one must remember that RA is by far the most common autoimmune rheumatic condition, deserving an appropriate remark.
The suggested approach for the etiologic workup is summarized in Figure 4.

3.8. Treatment of MM

Since MM is a disabling entity, the need for timely intervention to be provided is fairly consensual between guidelines and reviews, regardless of the underlying disease. High-dose glucocorticoids or intravenous glucocorticoids should be prescribed to all patients [67,68,69], except for those with hepatitis-B-related vasculitis, for which antiviral therapy should be the cornerstone of the scheme and immunosuppression should be individualized [70].
For AAV induction of remission, EULAR and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines suggest the association of a non-glucocorticoid immunosuppressor to the glucocorticoid, usually cyclophosphamide or rituximab, with a similar level of evidence [46,67]. For PAN and RV, evidence for rituximab is very scarce, so most reviews (based on a limited number of patients) suggest only cyclophosphamide [66,69]. The evidence from CV is also very incipient, but EULAR’s guideline suggests, based on specialists’ opinion, that the notions from AAV could be applied to CV, highlighting that hepatitis-C-related CV should also be treated with antivirals [68].
The remission induction phase usually lasts 3–6 months and the patient should be considered for a remission maintenance phase with methotrexate or azathioprine [67,68]. Patients induced with rituximab with good tolerability can be considered for the maintenance phase with rituximab [67]. The duration of the maintenance phase is uncertain for all the vasculitides described, but more than 18 months is suggested by the ACR for AAV and can be a point of reference for the other conditions [66] (Table 1).

3.9. Isolated Mononeuropathies

Mononeuropathies directly related to immune mechanisms in rheumatic diseases are uncommon because these diseases are typically systemic and other nerves or terminations will most likely be concomitantly affected. Nevertheless, isolated cranial neuropathies, especially trigeminal neuropathy, are well described in SS, mixed connective tissue disease, and systemic sclerosis [1,41].
Trigeminal neuropathy is more often that of a purely sensory nature, with numbness and paresthesia in the specific territory of the trigeminal branches (i.e., ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular branches). Neuropathic pain may occur, but masticatory muscle involvement is hardly ever present [71].
The diagnosis is suspected by clinical exam, showing hemifacial sensory loss (e.g., in pinprick test) [71]. When motor function is affected, there may be atrophy of masticatory muscles, marks of tongue bites, and deviation of the jaw during speech [71]. NCS/EMG can be used for confirmation, if necessary [72]. MRI of the trigeminal nerve location and related structures is warranted by some authors [71] because compressive neuropathies are more common than immune-mediated ones (when isolated nerves are considered) and the treatment is different.
We suggest that when facing a trigeminal neuropathy without other clinical symptoms (and without tumors documented by imaging), the clinician should consider SS because it can precede the other cardinal features [8].
The treatment of pure sensory trigeminal neuropathy is symptomatic [1]. For neuropathic pain, one should consider duloxetine, pregabalin, or carbamazepine [71].
Many entrapment syndromes can occur in the rheumatic patient because the musculoskeletal tissue represents one of the main sites for inflammation in these diseases and many nerves divide space with soft tissue. Therefore, the inflammation of these constricted areas are easily predisposed to neuropathy. Some remarkable diseases include carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS). They are reviewed briefly because the intent of the review is to focus on immune-mediated conditions.
In CTS, patients might complain initially of tingling, numbness, or pain in the hand, sometimes irradiating to the shoulder, and worse at the end of the night or morning, right after waking up. The symptoms can also occur after repetitive activities involving wrist flexion. With the progression of the disease, symptoms can occur outside of the morning window and muscular dysfunction may appear, with grip clumsiness or even overt weakness and thenar hypotrophy [73]. The disease is related to entrapment of the median nerve inside the carpal tunnel, so entities that promote extensive synovitis of the wrists are good candidates for etiologic agents. Nevertheless, CTS is a very common condition and no primary inflammatory disease is present in most cases [74].
TTS represents the entrapment of the posterior tibial nerve within the tarsal tunnel, formed by the flexor’s retinaculum and the tarsal bones [75]. Most patients present at first with pain, numbness, or a tingling sensation behind the medial malleolus, medial portion of the foot, heel, and plantar surface. Because of the venous drainage, symptoms are typically worse during daily activities, especially when the patient stands for extended periods [75], but as with any neuropathic pain, symptoms can also occur in the night. In advanced disease, motor impairment and interdigital atrophy can be seen. TTS is associated with diabetes, hind foot intrinsic deformities, trauma, and scarring, among others. Only a small portion of patients have inflammatory synovitis as a background, but it is a well-described cause [75].
Among the rheumatic autoimmune diseases related to CTS and TTS, RA is the most probable because it is more related to intense inflammatory synovitis. Peripheral spondyloarthritis is also remarkable, but it is not within the scope of this review, which is focused more on immune-mediated neuropathies.
Regarding the treatment of the entrapment neuropathies related to synovial inflammation, efforts should be made to control the underlying disease itself [44]. Considering RA, methotrexate will most likely be the first option, associated with anti-tumoral necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics in the case of failure [76]. Injections of glucocorticoids can promote relief until the immunosuppressors are adjusted [44].

4. Conclusions

Because the rheumatic-disease-related peripheral neuropathies can occur with a vast myriad of signs and symptoms, diagnosis is often hard and the narrow therapeutic window overlooked. As physical impairment is already a challenge in these patients because of advanced age and musculoskeletal manifestations, early and aggressive treatment of neurological manifestations is imperative. Future developments involving genetic and antibody profiles might help to predict peripheral neuropathies, but, at present, the knowledge is still scarce on the subject. Thus, we believe that a stepwise approach for diagnosis such as the one presented can facilitate the clinical reasoning until future tools are refined.

Author Contributions

The authors contributed to the manuscript as described: Conceptualization, J.M.D.S. and S.A.; methodology, J.M.D.S., T.J.T., S.R.S., A.C.L., M.C.F.J. and S.A.; investigation, J.M.D.S., T.J.T., S.R.S., A.C.L., M.C.F.J. and S.A.; writing—original draft, J.M.D.S., T.J.T., S.R.S., A.C.L., M.C.F.J. and S.A.; writing—review and editing, J.M.D.S., T.J.T., S.R.S., A.C.L., M.C.F.J. and S.A.; supervision, S.A. and M.C.F.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (grant number. 306723/2019-0), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher-Education Personnel (CAPES) finance code 001; Fundação Apoio À Pesquisa Estado São Paulo, Brasil (FAPESP—13/07559-3).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gwathmey, K.G.; Satkowiak, K. Peripheral nervous system manifestations of rheumatological diseases. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 424, 117421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Margaretten, M. Neurologic manifestations of primary Sjögren syndrome. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 43, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Florica, B.; Aghdassi, E.; Su, J.; Gladman, D.D.; Urowitz, M.B.; Fortin, P.R. Peripheral neuropathy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2011, 41, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Oomatia, A.; Fang, H.; Petri, M.; Birnbaum, J. Peripheral neuropathies in systemic lupus erythematosus: Clinical features, disease associations, and immunologic characteristics evaluated over a twenty-five-year study period. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014, 66, 1000–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gwathmey, K.G.; Burns, T.M.; Collins, M.P.; Dyck, J.B. Vasculitic neuropathies. Lancet Neurol. 2014, 13, 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramos-Casals, M.; Brito-Zerón, P.; Bombardieri, S.; Bootsma, H.; De Vita, S.; Dörner, T.; Fisher, B.A.; Gottenberg, J.E.; Hernandez-Molina, G.; Kocher, A.; et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of Sjögren’s syndrome with topical and systemic therapies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 79, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sène, D.; Jallouli, M.; Lefaucheur, J.P.; Saadoun, D.; Costedoat-Chalumeau, N.; Maisonobe, T.; Diemert, M.C.; Musset, L.; Haroche, J.; Piette, J.C.; et al. Peripheral neuropathies associated with primary Sjögren syndrome: Immunologic profiles of nonataxic sensory neuropathy and sensorimotor neuropathy. Medicine 2011, 90, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mori, K.; Iijima, M.; Koike, H.; Hattori, N.; Tanaka, F.; Watanabe, H.; Katsuno, M.; Fujita, A.; Aiba, I.; Ogata, A.; et al. The wide spectrum of clinical manifestations in Sjögren’s syndrome-associated neuropathy. Brain 2005, 128 Pt 11, 2518–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hoeijmakers, J.G.; Faber, C.G.; Lauria, G.; Merkies, I.S.; Waxman, S.G. Small-fibre neuropathies—Advances in diagnosis, pathophysiology and management. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012, 8, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Themistocleous, A.; Ramirez, J.D.; Serra, J.; Bennett, D.L.H. The clinical approach to small fibre neuropathy and painful channelopathy. Pract. Neurol. 2014, 14, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Oaklander, A.L.; Nolano, M. Scientific Advances in and Clinical Approaches to Small-Fiber Polyneuropathy: A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2019, 76, 1240–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Uceyler, N.; Kafke, W.; Riediger, N.; He, L.; Necula, G.; Toyka, K.V.; Sommer, C. Elevated proinflammatory cytokine expression in affected skin in small fiber neuropathy. Neurology 2010, 74, 1806–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Birnbaum, J.; Lalji, A.; Saed, A.; Baer, A.N. Biopsy-proven small-fiber neuropathy in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: Neuropathic pain characteristics, autoantibody findings, and histopathologic features. Arthritis Care Res. 2019, 71, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gorson, K.C.; Herrmann, D.N.; Thiagarajan, R.; Brannagan, T.H.; Chin, R.L.; Kinsella, L.J.; Ropper, A.H. Non-length dependent small fibre neuropathy/ganglionopathy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008, 79, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Siao, P.; Cros, D.P. Quantitative sensory testing. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2003, 14, 261–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Devigili, G.; Tugnoli, V.; Penza, P.; Camozzi, F.; Lombardi, R.; Melli, G.; Broglio, L.; Granieri, E.; Lauria, G. The diagnostic criteria for small fibre neuropathy: From symptoms to neuropathology. Brain 2008, 131, 1912–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lauria, G.; Hsieh, S.T.; Johansson, O.; Kennedy, W.R.; Leger, J.M.; Mellgren, S.I.; Nolano, M.; Merkies, I.S.; Polydefkis, M.; Smith, A.G.; et al. European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on the use of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010, 17, 903–912. [Google Scholar]
  18. Katsarava, Z.; Ayzenberg, I.; Sack, F.; Limmroth, V.; Diener, H.C.; Kaube, H. A novel method of eliciting pain-related potentials by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Headache 2006, 46, 1511–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mueller, D.; Obermann, M.; Koeppen, S.; Kavuk, I.; Yoon, M.S.; Sack, F.; Diener, H.C.; Kaube, H.; Katsarava, Z. Electrically evoked nociceptive potentials for early detection of diabetic small-fiber neuropathy. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010, 17, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agostino, R.; Cruccu, G.; Romaniello, A.; Innocenti, P.; Inghilleri, M.; Manfredi, M. Dysfunction of small myelinated afferents in diabetic polyneuropathy, as assessed by laser evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Atherton, D.D.; Facer, P.; Roberts, K.M.; Misra, V.P.; Chizh, B.A.; Bountra, C.; Anand, P. Use of the novel Contact Heat Evoked Potential Stimulator (CHEPS) for the assessment of small fibre neuropathy: Correlations with skin flare responses and intra-epidermal nerve fibre counts. BMC Neurol. 2007, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lagerburg, V.; Bakkers, M.; Bouwhuis, A.; Hoeijmakers, J.G.; Smit, A.M.; Van Den Berg, S.J.; Hordijk-De Boer, I.; Brouwer-Van Der Lee, M.D.; Kranendonk, D.; Reulen, J.P.; et al. Contact heat evoked potentials: Normal values and use in small-fiber neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2015, 51, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gorson, K.C.; Ropper, A.H. Positive salivary gland biopsy, Sjögren syndrome, and neuropathy: Clinical implications. Muscle Nerve 2003, 28, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Biswas, M.; Chatterjee, A.; Ghosh, S.K.; Dasgupta, S.; Ghosh, K.; Ganguly, P.K. Prevalence, types, clinical associations, and determinants of peripheral neuropathy in rheumatoid patients. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2011, 14, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Agarwal, V.; Singh, R.; Wiclaf Chauhan, S.; Tahlan, A.; Ahuja, C.K.; Goel, D.; Pal, L. A clinical, electrophysiological, and pathological study of neuropathy in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2008, 27, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khan, S.; Zhou, L. Characterization of non-length-dependent small-fiber sensory neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2012, 45, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mekinian, A.; Ravaud, P.; Hatron, P.Y.; Larroche, C.; Leone, J.; Gombert, B.; Hamidou, M.; Cantagrel, A.; Marcelli, C.; Rist, S.; et al. Efficacy of rituximab in primary Sjögren’s syndrome with peripheral nervous system involvement: Results from the AIR registry. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012, 71, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hovaguimian, A.; Gibbons, C.H. Diagnosis and treatment of pain in small-fiber neuropathy. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2011, 15, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ho, T.W.; Backonja, M.; Ma, J.; Leibensperger, H.; Froman, S.; Polydefkis, M. Efficient assessment of neuropathic pain drugs in patients with small fiber sensory neuropathies. Pain 2009, 141, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morozumi, S.; Kawagashira, Y.; Iijima, M.; Koike, H.; Hattori, N.; Katsuno, M.; Tanaka, F.; Sobue, G. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for painful sensory neuropathy associated with Sjögren’s syndrome. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009, 279, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bril, V.; Katzberg, H.D. Acquired immune axonal neuropathies. Contin. Lifelong Learn. Neurol. 2014, 20, 1261–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Delalande, S.; de Seze, J.; Fauchais, A.L.; Hachulla, E.; Stojkovic, T.; Ferriby, D.; Dubucquoi, S.; Pruvo, J.P.; Vermersch, P.; Hatron, P.Y. Neurologic manifestations in primary Sjögren syndrome: A study of 82 patients. Medicine 2004, 83, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jamilloux, Y.; Magy, L.; Hurtevent, J.F.; Gondran, G.; de Seze, J.; Launay, D.; Ly, K.H.; Lambert, M.; Hachulla, E.; Hatron, P.Y.; et al. Immunological profiles determine neurological involvement in Sjögren’s syndrome. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2014, 25, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fargetti, S.; Ugolini-Lopes, M.R.; Pasoto, S.G.; Seguro, L.P.C.; Shinjo, S.K.; Bonfa, E.; Borba, E.F. Short- and Long-Term Outcome of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Peripheral Neuropathy: Bimodal Pattern of Onset and Treatment Response. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2021, 27, S212–S216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nishi, R.; Koike, H.; Ohyama, K.; Fukami, Y.; Ikeda, S.; Kawagashira, Y.; Iijima, M.; Katsuno, M.; Sobue, G. Differential clinicopathologic features of EGPA-associated neuropathy with and without ANCA. Neurology 2020, 94, e1726–e1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Imboden, J.B. Involvement of the Peripheral Nervous System in Polyarteritis Nodosa and Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies-Associated Vasculitis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 43, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. de Boysson, H.; Guillevin, L. Polyarteritis Nodosa Neurologic Manifestations. Neurol. Clin. 2019, 37, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bortoluzzi, A.; Silvagni, E.; Furini, F.; Piga, M.; Govoni, M. Peripheral nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: A review of the evidence. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2019, 37, 146–155. [Google Scholar]
  39. Imam, M.H.; Koriem, H.K.; Hassan, M.M.; El-Hadidi, A.S.; Ibrahim, N.A. Pattern of peripheral neuropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: Clinical, electrophysiological, and laboratory properties and their association with disease activity. Egypt. Rheumatol. Rehabil. 2019, 46, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tulbă, D.; Popescu, B.O.; Manole, E.; Băicuș, C. Immune Axonal Neuropathies Associated with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 610585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martinez, A.R.; Faber, I.; Nucci, A.; Appenzeller, S.; França, M.C., Jr. Autoimmune neuropathies associated to rheumatic diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2017, 16, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Julio, P.R.; Cortês, M.M.M.; Costallat, L.T.L.; Gaino, J.Z.; França, M.C., Jr.; Appenzeller, S. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2021, 51, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Constantin, A.; Năstase, D.; Tulbă, D.; Bălănescu, P.; Băicuș, C. Immunosuppressive therapy of systemic lupus erythematosus associated peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review. Lupus 2020, 29, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. DeQuattro, K.; Imboden, J.B. Neurologic Manifestations of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 43, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yates, M.; Watts, R.A.; Bajema, I.M.; Cid, M.C.; Crestani, B.; Hauser, T.; Hellmich, B.; Holle, J.U.; Laudien, M.; Little, M.A.; et al. EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016, 75, 1583–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lauria, G.; Pareyson, D.; Grisoli, M.; Sghirlanzoni, A. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings in chronic sensory ganglionopathies. Ann. Neurol. 2000, 47, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Amato, A.A.; Ropper, A.H. Sensory Ganglionopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1657–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martinez, A.R.; Nunes, M.B.; Nucci, A.; França, M.C., Jr. Sensory neuronopathy and autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune Dis. 2012, 2012, 873587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gøransson, L.G.; Herigstad, A.; Tjensvoll, A.B.; Harboe, E.; Mellgren, S.I.; Omdal, R. Peripheral neuropathy in primary Sjögren syndrome: A population-based study. Arch. Neurol. 2006, 63, 1612–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kawagashira, Y.; Koike, H.; Fujioka, Y.; Hashimoto, R.; Tomita, M.; Morozumi, S.; Iijima, M.; Katsuno, M.; Tanaka, F.; Sobue, G. Differential, size-dependent sensory neuron involvement in the painful and ataxic forms of primary Sjögren’s syndrome-associated neuropathy. J. Neurol. Sci. 2012, 319, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tholance, Y.; Moritz, C.P.; Rosier, C.; Ferraud, K.; Lassablière, F.; Reynaud-Federspiel, E.; França, M.C., Jr.; Martinez, A.R.M.; Camdessanché, J.P.; Antoine, J.C. Clinical characterisation of sensory neuropathy with anti-FGFR3 autoantibodies. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2020, 91, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Kuntzer, T.; Antoine, J.C.; Steck, A.J. Clinical features and pathophysiological basis of sensory neuronopathies (ganglionopathies). Muscle Nerve 2004, 30, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lauria, G.; Pareyson, D.; Sghirlanzoni, A. Neurophysiological diagnosis of acquired sensory ganglionopathies. Eur. Neurol. 2003, 50, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lefter, S.; Monaghan, B.; McNamara, B.; Regan, M.J. Acute severe sensory ganglionopathy in systemic lupus erythematous. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2020, 30, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zis, P.; Hadjivassiliou, M.; Sarrigiannis, P.G.; Barker, A.S.J.E.; Rao, D.G. Rapid neurophysiological screening for sensory ganglionopathy: A novel approach. Brain Behav. 2017, 7, e00880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Birnbaum, J. Peripheral nervous system manifestations of Sjögren syndrome: Clinical patterns, diagnostic paradigms, etiopathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies. Neurologist 2010, 16, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Antoine, J.-C.; Robert-Varvat, F.; Maisonobe, T.; Créange, A.; Franques, J.; Mathis, S.; Delmont, E.; Kuntzer, T.; Lefaucheur, J.-P.; Pouget, J.; et al. Identifying a therapeutic window in acute and subacute inflammatory sensory neuronopathies. J. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 361, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. McCoy, S.S.; Baer, A.N. Neurological Complications of Sjögren’s Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management. Curr. Treat. Options Rheumatol. 2017, 3, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pereira, P.R.; Viala, K.; Maisonobe, T.; Haroche, J.; Mathian, A.; Hié, M.; Amoura, Z.; Cohen Aubart, F. Sjögren Sensory Neuronopathy (Sjögren Ganglionopathy): Long-Term Outcome and Treatment Response in a Series of 13 Cases. Medicine 2016, 95, e3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gorson, K.C.; Natarajan, N.; Ropper, A.H.; Weinstein, R. Rituximab treatment in patients with IVIg-dependent immune polyneuropathy: A prospective pilot trial. Muscle Nerve 2007, 35, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Y.S.; Sun, A.P.; Chen, L.; Dong, R.F.; Zhong, Y.F.; Zhang, J. Nerve biopsy findings contribute to diagnosis of multiple mononeuropathy: 78% of findings support clinical diagnosis. Neural. Regen. Res. 2015, 10, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rosenbaum, R. Neuromuscular complications of connective tissue diseases. Muscle Nerve 2001, 24, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Collins, M.P.; Mendell, J.R.; Periquet, M.I.; Sahenk, Z.; Amato, A.A.; Gronseth, G.S.; Barohn, R.J.; Jackson, C.E.; Kissel, J.T. Superficial peroneal nerve/peroneus brevis muscle biopsy in vasculitic neuropathy. Neurology 2000, 55, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ross, M.A. Electrodiagnosis of peripheral neuropathy. Neurol. Clin. 2012, 30, 529–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chung, S.A.; Gorelik, M.; Langford, C.A.; Maz, M.; Abril, A.; Guyatt, G.; Archer, A.M.; Conn, D.L.; Full, K.A.; Grayson, P.C.; et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Polyarteritis Nodosa. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021, 73, 1384–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jennette, J.C.; Falk, R.J.; Bacon, P.A.; Basu, N.; Cid, M.C.; Ferrario, F.; Flores-Suarez, L.F.; Gross, W.L.; Guillevin, L.; Hagen, E.C.; et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chung, S.A.; Langford, C.A.; Maz, M.; Abril, A.; Gorelik, M.; Guyatt, G.; Archer, A.M.; Conn, D.L.; Full, K.A.; Grayson, P.C.; et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021, 73, 1088–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mukhtyar, C.; Guillevin, L.; Cid, M.C.; Dasgupta, B.; de Groot, K.; Gross, W.; Hauser, T.; Hellmich, B.; Jayne, D.; Kallenberg, C.G.; et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2009, 68, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Genta, M.S.; Genta, R.M.; Gabay, C. Systemic rheumatoid vasculitis: A review. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 36, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mitka, M. FDA: Increased HBV reactivation risk with ofatumumab or rituximab. JAMA 2013, 310, 1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Smith, J.H.; Cutrer, F.M. Numbness matters: A clinical review of trigeminal neuropathy. Cephalalgia 2011, 31, 1131–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jääskeläinen, S.K. The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy. J. Orofac. Pain 2004, 18, 355–359. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wilder-Smith, E.P.; Seet, R.C.S.; Lim, E.C.H. Diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome—Clinical criteria and ancillary tests. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2006, 2, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bland, J.D. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2005, 18, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ahmad, M.; Tsang, K.; Mackenney, P.J.; Adedapo, A.O. Tarsal tunnel syndrome: A literature review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012, 18, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fraenkel, L.; Bathon, J.M.; England, B.R.; St. Clair, E.W.; Arayssi, T.; Carandang, K.; Deane, K.D.; Genovese, M.; Huston, K.K.; Kerr, G.; et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021, 73, 924–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 16 00587 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed diagnostic flowchart for patients with small fiber neuropathy. Notes: Anti-SSA/Ro is the main autoantibody related to Sjögren’s syndrome and part of the contemporary diagnostic criteria. Sicca symptoms refer to the complaints related to dryness of the mouth, eyes, skin, and genital and respiratory tracts. Legend: MSG: minor salivary gland; OSS: ocular staining score (ophthalmic exam with specific dyes aiming to document and quantify eye surface’s lesions); Sch: Schirmer’s test (quantification of lacrimal flow volume by time unit); SFN: small fiber neuropathy; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SM: unstimulated sialometry (simple quantification of salivary flow volume by time unit); SS: Sjögren syndrome. * Consider treating neuropathic pain and repeating functional tests after 6 months. † Consider testing for anti-DNA and anti-Sm.
Figure 1. Proposed diagnostic flowchart for patients with small fiber neuropathy. Notes: Anti-SSA/Ro is the main autoantibody related to Sjögren’s syndrome and part of the contemporary diagnostic criteria. Sicca symptoms refer to the complaints related to dryness of the mouth, eyes, skin, and genital and respiratory tracts. Legend: MSG: minor salivary gland; OSS: ocular staining score (ophthalmic exam with specific dyes aiming to document and quantify eye surface’s lesions); Sch: Schirmer’s test (quantification of lacrimal flow volume by time unit); SFN: small fiber neuropathy; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SM: unstimulated sialometry (simple quantification of salivary flow volume by time unit); SS: Sjögren syndrome. * Consider treating neuropathic pain and repeating functional tests after 6 months. † Consider testing for anti-DNA and anti-Sm.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00587 g001
Pharmaceuticals 16 00587 g002 550
Figure 2. Proposed approach for the patient with pure sensory polyneuropathy (except isolated small fiber neuropathy) or sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Notes: Anti-SSA/Ro is the main autoantibody related to Sjögren’s syndrome and part of the contemporary diagnostic criteria. Sicca symptoms refer to the complaints related to dryness of the mouth, eyes, skin, and genital and respiratory tracts. Legend: ACPA: anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; JUS: joint ultrasound; MSG: minor salivary gland; OSS: ocular staining score (ophthalmic exam with specific dyes aiming to document and quantify eye surface’s desepithelization); RA: rheumatoid arthritis; Sch: Schirmer’s test (quantification of lacrimal flow volume by time unit); SPN/SMPN: sensory polyneuropathy/sensorimotor polyneuropathy; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SM: unstimulated sialometry (simple quantification of salivary flow volume by time unit); SS: Sjögren’s syndrome. * Treat neuropathy (see text) and either: (1) order anti-Sm and anti-DNA for systemic lupus erythematosus; (2) order antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody for systemic vasculitides; or (3) reassess in 6 months. † Consider testing for anti-DNA and anti-Sm. ‡ Order rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (if not carried out yet) for prognostic purposes.
Figure 2. Proposed approach for the patient with pure sensory polyneuropathy (except isolated small fiber neuropathy) or sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Notes: Anti-SSA/Ro is the main autoantibody related to Sjögren’s syndrome and part of the contemporary diagnostic criteria. Sicca symptoms refer to the complaints related to dryness of the mouth, eyes, skin, and genital and respiratory tracts. Legend: ACPA: anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody; JUS: joint ultrasound; MSG: minor salivary gland; OSS: ocular staining score (ophthalmic exam with specific dyes aiming to document and quantify eye surface’s desepithelization); RA: rheumatoid arthritis; Sch: Schirmer’s test (quantification of lacrimal flow volume by time unit); SPN/SMPN: sensory polyneuropathy/sensorimotor polyneuropathy; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; SM: unstimulated sialometry (simple quantification of salivary flow volume by time unit); SS: Sjögren’s syndrome. * Treat neuropathy (see text) and either: (1) order anti-Sm and anti-DNA for systemic lupus erythematosus; (2) order antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody for systemic vasculitides; or (3) reassess in 6 months. † Consider testing for anti-DNA and anti-Sm. ‡ Order rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (if not carried out yet) for prognostic purposes.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00587 g002
Pharmaceuticals 16 00587 g003 550
Figure 3. Proposed approach for patients with sensory neuronopathy. Notes: Anti-SSA/Ro is the main autoantibody related to Sjögren’s syndrome and part of the contemporary diagnostic criteria. Sicca symptoms refer to the complaints related to dryness of the mouth, eyes, skin, and genital and respiratory tracts. Legend: MSG: minor salivary gland; OSS: ocular staining score (ophthalmic exam with specific dyes aiming to document and quantify eye surface’s desepithelization); Sch: Schirmer’s test (quantification of lacrimal flow volume by time unit); SGMRI: magnetic resonance imaging of salivary glands; SGUS: ultrasound of salivary glands; SM: unstimulated sialometry (simple quantification of salivary flow volume by time unit); SN: sensory neuronopathy; SS: Sjögren’s syndrome. * Consider new biopsy of minor salivary gland, because the first one might have missed the diagnosis. † Treat aggressively (see text) and consider the unusual diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis-related sensory neuronopathy. Might order anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, anti-DNA, and anti-Sm. If negative, consider a new assessment for Sjögren’s syndrome in 6 months.
Figure 3. Proposed approach for patients with sensory neuronopathy. Notes: Anti-SSA/Ro is the main autoantibody related to Sjögren’s syndrome and part of the contemporary diagnostic criteria. Sicca symptoms refer to the complaints related to dryness of the mouth, eyes, skin, and genital and respiratory tracts. Legend: MSG: minor salivary gland; OSS: ocular staining score (ophthalmic exam with specific dyes aiming to document and quantify eye surface’s desepithelization); Sch: Schirmer’s test (quantification of lacrimal flow volume by time unit); SGMRI: magnetic resonance imaging of salivary glands; SGUS: ultrasound of salivary glands; SM: unstimulated sialometry (simple quantification of salivary flow volume by time unit); SN: sensory neuronopathy; SS: Sjögren’s syndrome. * Consider new biopsy of minor salivary gland, because the first one might have missed the diagnosis. † Treat aggressively (see text) and consider the unusual diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis-related sensory neuronopathy. Might order anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, anti-DNA, and anti-Sm. If negative, consider a new assessment for Sjögren’s syndrome in 6 months.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00587 g003
Pharmaceuticals 16 00587 g004 550
Figure 4. Proposed diagnostic flow for confirmed multiple mononeuropathy. Legend: AAV: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis; ANCA: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; CG: serum cryoglobulin; CV: cryoglobulinemic vasculitis; DD: differential diagnosis; EGPA: eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; HT: hypertension; MM: multiple mononeuropathy; PAN: polyarteritis nodosa; PEo: peripheral eosinophils; RF: renal failure; RV: rheumatoid vasculitis; SVV: small vessel vasculitis; UrP: urinary protein. * If immunofluorescence for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies is perinuclear, confirm with anti-myeloperoxidase; if it is cytoplasmic, confirm with anti-proteinase 3. † If antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies are negative, dose cryoglobulins. If cryoglobulins are absent, order antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. If both are negative, treat as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (see text) because of the severity. ‡ Consider guiding biopsy by nerve conduction studies and electromyography, or alternatives to multiple mononeuritis, such as hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies.
Figure 4. Proposed diagnostic flow for confirmed multiple mononeuropathy. Legend: AAV: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis; ANCA: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; CG: serum cryoglobulin; CV: cryoglobulinemic vasculitis; DD: differential diagnosis; EGPA: eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; HT: hypertension; MM: multiple mononeuropathy; PAN: polyarteritis nodosa; PEo: peripheral eosinophils; RF: renal failure; RV: rheumatoid vasculitis; SVV: small vessel vasculitis; UrP: urinary protein. * If immunofluorescence for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies is perinuclear, confirm with anti-myeloperoxidase; if it is cytoplasmic, confirm with anti-proteinase 3. † If antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies are negative, dose cryoglobulins. If cryoglobulins are absent, order antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. If both are negative, treat as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (see text) because of the severity. ‡ Consider guiding biopsy by nerve conduction studies and electromyography, or alternatives to multiple mononeuritis, such as hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies.
Pharmaceuticals 16 00587 g004
Table
Table 1. Suggested schemes for induction and maintenance of remission of the discussed autoimmune rheumatic-disease-related neuropathies.
Table 1. Suggested schemes for induction and maintenance of remission of the discussed autoimmune rheumatic-disease-related neuropathies.
ConditionInductionMaintenance
Small fiber neuropathyIntravenous methylprednisolone pulse; intravenous immunoglobulin *Evidence limited, consider gabapentin and/or tramadol for neuropathic pain
Axonal sensory neuropathy/sensorimotor polyneuropathyIntravenous methylprednisolone pulse, intravenous cyclophosphamide pulsesAzathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab
Sensory neuronopathyIntravenous methylprednisolone pulse; intravenous immunoglobulin *Mycophenolate mofetil
Multiple mononeuritisIntravenous methylprednisolone pulse, intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses, rituximabAzathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab
Suggested doses: intravenous methylprednisolone: 1 g/day for 3 days; intravenous immunoglobulin: 1 g/kg/day for 2 days; intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses: 500 mg/day every 15 days for 6 doses; oral methotrexate: 10–25 mg/week; oral azathioprine: 2–3 mg/kg/day; oral mycophenolate mofetil: 2–3 g/day; rituximab: 1 g on days 1 and 15, followed by 500 mg every 6 months. * Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy refers to the infusion of a mixture of polyvalent IgG from thousands of donors. There is no sufficient evidence favoring a particular brand of human immunoglobulin.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Souza, J.M.; Trevisan, T.J.; Sepresse, S.R.; Londe, A.C.; França Júnior, M.C.; Appenzeller, S. Peripheral Neuropathy in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases—Diagnosis and Treatment. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040587

AMA Style

De Souza JM, Trevisan TJ, Sepresse SR, Londe AC, França Júnior MC, Appenzeller S. Peripheral Neuropathy in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases—Diagnosis and Treatment. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(4):587. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040587

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Souza, Jean Marcos, Thiago Junqueira Trevisan, Samara Rosa Sepresse, Ana Carolina Londe, Marcondes Cavalcante França Júnior, and Simone Appenzeller. 2023. "Peripheral Neuropathy in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases—Diagnosis and Treatment" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 4: 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040587

APA Style

De Souza, J. M., Trevisan, T. J., Sepresse, S. R., Londe, A. C., França Júnior, M. C., & Appenzeller, S. (2023). Peripheral Neuropathy in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases—Diagnosis and Treatment. Pharmaceuticals, 16(4), 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040587

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop