Next Article in Journal
Polyphenols: Natural Food-Grade Biomolecules for the Treatment of Nervous System Diseases from a Multi-Target Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating Thromboprophylaxis Strategies for High-Risk Pregnancy: A Current Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design, Rational Repurposing, Synthesis, In Vitro Evaluation, Homology Modeling and In Silico Study of Sulfuretin Analogs as Potential Antileishmanial Hit Compounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytochemical Study of the Anthelminthic Potential of Guadeloupean Plant Biodiversity

by
Tressy Cabald
1,
Carine Marie-Magdeleine
2,*,
Lucien Philibert
2,
Cédric Caradeuc
3,4,
Gildas Bertho
3,4,
Nicolas Giraud
3,4,
Gerardo Cebrián-Torrejón
1 and
Muriel Sylvestre
1,*
1
COVACHIM-M2E Laboratory EA 3592, Department of Chemistry, University of the French West Indies, Fouillole Campus, UFR SEN, 97157 Pointe-à-Pitre, France
2
INRAE, ASSET, 97170 Petit-Bourg, France
3
Laboratory of Pharmacological and Toxicological Chemistry and Biochemistry (UMR 8601 CNRS), University Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France
4
BioMedTech Facilities—INSERM US36|CNRS UAR2009, University Paris Cité, 75006 Paris, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(6), 774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17060774
Submission received: 5 March 2024 / Revised: 27 May 2024 / Accepted: 28 May 2024 / Published: 13 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Drug Discovery and Development for Tropical Diseases (TDs))

Abstract

:
Gastrointestinal parasitism is a major health and welfare problem in ruminants. Synthetic chemical anthelmintic drugs have led to the emergence of resistance in gastrointestinal strongyles, inducing the search for alternatives to control the infections that affect ruminants. The objective of this work was to evaluate the anthelmintic potential of plant extracts against Haemonchus contortus Rudolphi. Three plants of the Guadeloupean biodiversity, Momordica charantia L., Carica papaya L. and Sargassum spp., were selected based on their high polyphenolic content and natural abundance. The phytochemistry of plants was explored, a biological assay against the parasite H. contortus was carried out, and several hypotheses about the way of action were proposed by an innovative electrochemical screening method.

1. Introduction

Ruminants in grazing conditions are exposed to several species of parasites such as roundworms, also called strongyles or gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN).
Infections with GIN are the most widespread parasitic diseases. They represent a real obstacle to animal production in the world, particularly in tropical regions [1].
They are a major health problem faced by breeders, leading to significant economic losses due to stunted growth, weight loss and reduced fertility [2].
Among GIN, the barber worm H. contortus Rudolphi is considered to be the most pathogenic species that infects sheep [3]. It is a hematophagous parasite that is located mainly in the abomasum of ruminants [4]. It feeds on blood and causes severe anaemia that can lead to the death of severely affected host animals [5].
For more than 50 years, the main control strategy adopted against GIN in sheep and goats has been based mainly on the systematic and repeated use of synthetic anthelmintic (AH) treatments such as thiabendazole, ivermectin and levamisole [6,7,8,9]. The goal is to interrupt the life cycle of the helminths by killing the worms in the hosts in order to reduce the dynamics of infestations [10,11].
However, despite the arsenal of chemical anthelmintics available, the situation is getting worse [12]. Indeed, the intensive and inappropriate use of these drugs has led to the emergence of multi-resistance [13,14].
Moreover, in Guadeloupe (French West Indies), a study showed that all sheep farms in the territory are resistant to benzimidazoles and that the majority of them present resistance to two or three families of synthetic anthelmintics [15].
In addition, these antiparasitic drugs are expensive, and consumers are increasingly sceptical about the use of chemical molecules in farm animals, which could lead to the possible presence of chemical residues in food products and in the environment, thus constituting a pollution risk [16].
Therefore, it is necessary to research and implement alternative or complementary methods of control of gastrointestinal strongyles in order to find and develop new anthelmintic molecules to check and treat parasitic diseases [17].
Different approaches, such as herbal medicine, are used. Medicinal plants contain secondary metabolites that can confer anthelmintic activity [18,19,20,21,22,23].
Polyphenols are secondary metabolites that naturally perform defence functions in plants and could be able to alter the life cycle of gastrointestinal strongyles [11].
The use of biologically active plant extracts rich in polyphenolic compounds, especially tannins, could constitute a future alternative to synthetic anthelmintic molecules [24,25,26,27]. Numerous in vitro and in vivo experiments have demonstrated their anthelmintic effects on the main species of gastrointestinal nematodes, in particular H. contortus, thus allowing them to fight against gastrointestinal parasitism in small ruminants [28,29,30,31,32,33].
This study was carried out to assess the in vitro anthelmintic potential of aqueous plant extracts, which could then be easily produced by farmers and added directly to animal feed.
Aqueous extracts were therefore prepared from three selected plants containing polyphenolic molecules: Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae), a pantropical herb whose local vernacular name is Pawoka (Figure 1A); Carica papaya L. (Caricaceae) (Figure 1B) and Sargassum spp. (Sargassaceae) (Figure 1C). The 3 aqueous extracts were evaluated against infectious L3 larvae of the gastrointestinal parasite H. contortus using the larval exsheathment inhibition assay (LEIA).
Our choice was based on previous work concerning the anthelmintic activity of M. charantia and C. papaya extracts. In the case of M. charantia, extracts were tested against Caenorhabditis elegans [34], and phenolic compounds (gallic, tannic, caffeic, benzoic and p-coumaric acids, (+)-catechin) and antioxidant activities were reported [35].
Similarly, several studies have explored the anthelmintic potential of C. papaya leaves [36]. C. papaya leaves also contain rutin, the most abundant flavonoid, and phenolic compounds such as gallic and caffeic acids [37]. In addition, high levels of catechin, naringenin, chlorogenic and syringic acids have been identified in C. papaya extracts [38].
Finally, the literature reports that extracts of other Sargassum species (S. fusiforme (Harv.) Setchell and S. latifolium (Agardeh)) have been used as anthelmintics [39,40,41].
In addition, we aimed to develop a reliable, reproducible, fast and innovative technique by electrochemical screening via heme and chitin interaction study in order to rapidly detect extracts or molecules with high AH activity. Our aim is to propose an alternative approach to the various developmental stages of H. contortus, such as the egg, with the chitin interaction, and the haematophagous stages, such as L4 worms or adults, with the heme interaction.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Eco Extraction Efficiency

After the eco-extraction step, which combines microwave hydrodiffusion with gravity, allowing the extraction of non-volatile natural substances, good yields were obtained for Pawoka, Papaya and Sargassum extracts, respectively 0.86%, 2.31% and 1.58%, in the order of the yields usually obtained at our laboratory with this technique.
This green extraction method offers several advantages compared to conventional extraction techniques usually used, such as a reduction of the extraction time, absence of chemical alteration, high purity extract and high extraction yield.
Alcoholic extracts may be more interesting. However, the aim of the research is to obtain extracts that can be consumed directly by animals and easily produced by farmers. For these reasons, aqueous extracts are more interesting for this study.

2.2. Chitin Extraction Yield

The yield obtained for the extraction of chitin is 2.6% (12.8 g). This yield is comparable to other yields obtained in the laboratory for this type of natural polymers.

2.3. Quantification of Polyphenols

It is observed that the three extracts active against H. contortus (Sargassum, Papaya and Pawoka) are rich in polyphenols (Table 1). The concentrations of Sargassum, Papaya and Pawoka extracts are 22.125 µg/mL, 153.125 µg/mL and 85.300 µg/mL, respectively. Therefore, it is concluded that the Papaya extract is the most concentrated in polyphenols, while conversely, the Sargassum extract is the least concentrated.

2.4. NMR-Based Structural Analysis and Metabolomics

The chemical composition of the three plant extracts was determined by 1H NMR. For each, it is not absolute concentrations but relative values. In addition to classical 1D NMR experiments, many 2D NMR experiments (1H-1H COSY, 1H-1H TOCSY, 1H-1H NOESY, 1H-13C HSQC, 1H-13C HMBC) have been performed to confirm the structure of the chemical compounds found using Chenomx.
Not surprisingly, the 1H NMR spectrum of the aqueous extract of Sargassum shows that it is rich in mannitol but also in amino acids such as alanine, glutamate, glutamine, asparagine and valine (Figure 2A and Table 2A).
The 1H NMR analysis of the Papaya aqueous extract allowed the identification and quantification of the most abundant compounds such as glucose, malate, asparagine, alanine, valine 4-aminobutyrate acid or chlorogenate. The phenolic compound chlorogenate, also called 3-O-caffeoyl-D-quinic acid, the alkaloid trigonelline as well as other minor compounds could also be quantified (Figure 2B and Table 2B).
On the 1H NMR spectrum of the Papaya extract, in the region between 6 and 9 ppm, numerous signals indicating the presence of several aromatic protons were observed. This finding is related to the proven richness in polyphenols of the Papaya extract previously determined (153.125 µg/mL) (Figure 2B).
The composition of the aqueous extract of Pawoka was determined by metabolomics (Figure 2C and Table 2C). The 1H NMR spectrum of this extract shows a high concentration of carboxylic acids (total 15.6686 mM) but also of carbohydrates (total 13.0754 mM) and, to a lesser extent, of amino acids (total 5.5904 mM). We can also note the presence of the alkaloid trigonelline (Figure 2C and Table 2C).

2.5. Biological Effects of Extracts

After 70 min, the percentage of exsheathment observed for the negative control (PBS) of each extract was between 94 and 98% (Table 3).
Overall, the extracts showed variable average efficiencies, ranging from 7 to 60% (Table 3 and Figure 3). It can be seen that, depending on the concentration tested, the efficiency of Papaya (Figure S2), Sargassum (Figure S3) and Pawoka (Figure S4) extracts is not always the same. It is concluded, in relation to the results of the analysis of variance, that there is a significant dose effect for all the extracts (p < 0.05).
For Papaya extract, a significant effect was also observed compared to the PBS control (p < 0.05). However, the percentages of exsheathment obtained at concentrations of 0.25 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, 1.25 mg/mL and 2.5 mg/mL (Figure 3) did not differ significantly from that obtained for the PBS negative control (p > 0.05). It is concluded that at these four concentrations, the extract had no AH activity. We can, therefore, hypothesise that there would be no effective molecules or that they are not in a large enough quantity to allow the inhibition of larval exsheathment in the H. contortus parasite.
On the other hand, it can be noticed that the percentage of exsheathment obtained at the concentration of 5 mg/mL (Figure 3) differed significantly from the percentage of exsheathment obtained for the PBS negative control (p < 0.05). It is concluded that the extract had AH activity at this concentration. We can, therefore, hypothesise that there are effective molecules for the inhibition of larval exsheathment of the H. contortus parasite in the Papaya extract and that they act at a threshold concentration of 5 mg/mL.
For the Sargassum extracts, we observed that despite a significant global effect of the extract compared to the PBS control (p < 0.05) and a dose effect (p < 0.05), the percentage of exsheathment obtained at the concentrations of 0.25 mg/mL and 0.5 mg/mL (Figure 3) did not differ significantly from the percentage of exsheathment obtained for the PBS negative control (p > 0.05). It can be concluded that at these two concentrations, the extract had no AH activity. We can, therefore, hypothesise that there were no effective molecules or that they were not in sufficient quantity to allow the larval exsheathment in the H. contortus parasite.
However, on the opposite, it can be seen that the percentage of exsheathment obtained at the concentrations of 1.25 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL (Figure 3) differed significantly from the percentage of exsheathment obtained for the PBS negative control (p > 0.05). It is concluded that at these concentrations, the extract had AH activity. It can, therefore, be hypothesised that there are effective molecules to inhibit larval exsheathment in the H. contortus parasite in the Sargassum extract at the threshold concentration of 1.25 mg/mL.
For Pawoka extracts, we observed a significant global effect of the extract compared to the PBS control (p < 0.05) and a significant dose effect (p < 0.05). Moreover, the percentage of exsheathment obtained at the concentration of 0.25 mg/mL (Figure 3) did not differ significantly from the percentage of exsheathment obtained for PBS negative control (p > 0.05). It can be concluded that the extract has no AH activity at these concentrations. We can, therefore, hypothesise that there were no effective molecules or that they were not in sufficient quantity to allow the larval exsheathment in the H. contortus parasite.
However, on the opposite, it can be seen that the percentage of exsheathment obtained at the concentrations of 1.25 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL (Figure 3) differed significantly from the percentage of exsheathment obtained for the PBS negative control (p > 0.05). It is concluded that the extract has AH activity at these concentrations. It can be hypothesised that there would be effective molecules in Pawoka extract to inhibit larval exsheathment in the H. contortus parasite at a threshold between 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL.
We observe that at the same maximum concentration (5 mg/mL), the effects of the three effective extracts (Figure 3) were significantly different (between 2.5 and 17.5% inhibition of larval exsheathment; p < 0.05), with no significant difference between the Sargassum and Pawoka extracts (p > 0.05) The latter two extracts, not significantly different, showed a higher efficacy than the Papaya extract of 14.3%.
Furthermore, the threshold effective concentrations observed for the three plant extracts, namely 5 mg/mL for Papaya, 1.25 mg/mL for Sargassum and between 0.25 mg/mL and 0.5 mg/mL for Pawoka, demonstrated that the last is the most effective of the three plants (Figure 3). This result is confirmed by the IC50 values calculated, which show the lowest value for Pawoka (Table 3).

2.6. Electrochemical Screening

In the study of the interaction with heme, we focused our analysis on the modifications related to the characteristic signal of heme (−0.20 mV). This signal corresponds to the FeIII/FeII reduction (Table 4).
We observed that the voltammogram (CV) of the active molecule against H. contortus, levamisole (Figure S5), and those of Pawoka extract (Figure 4A) and Sargassum extract (Figure 4B) each showed a peak almost identical to that recorded for heme, close to the region where the FeIII/FeII reduction occurs. On the other hand, we observed that the voltammogram of thiabendazole (a broad-spectrum AH agent used predominantly in the treatment of intestinal pinworm and strongyloides infection) showed a peak identical to that of heme, located exactly in the region where the reduction of the latter occurs (Figure S6). It is concluded that these three compounds do not bind to heme; therefore, there is no interaction. Another way of action must be involved in the anthelmintic activity of these compounds.
It could be seen that the voltamograms of ivermectin (an endectocidal drug widely used as an anthelmintic in animal husbandry; Figure S7), Papaya extract (Figure 4C), L. leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. (Figure S8) and M. esculenta tannins (Figure S9) showed well-defined peaks, which positions were widely shifted with respect to the heme signal. They appeared at more negative potentials than that of heme. We concluded that these compounds bind to heme, so there was an interaction.
In the study of the interaction with chitin, we focused our analysis on the changes concerning the characteristic signal of chitin (−0.40 mV) (Table 5). It was observed that the voltammogram of L. leucocephala tannins showed a peak almost identical to that recorded for chitin, close to the region where the reduction occurred (Figure S10). We concluded that these tannins did not bind to chitin therefore there was no interaction.
It can be seen that the voltamograms of ivermectin (Figure S11), levamisole (Figure S12), extracts of Papaya (Figure 4D), Pawoka (Figure 4E), Sargassum (Figure 4F), M. esculenta tannins (Figure S13), and thiabendazole (Figure S14) show well-defined peaks whose position was very largely shifted from the chitin signal. They appeared at more negative potentials than chitin. We concluded that these compounds bind to chitin, and there was an interaction.
By putting in relation the different results obtained, we observe that our plant extracts all interacted with chitin while only the Papaya extract showed an interaction with heme. It would then be interesting to evaluate the AH activity of our plant extracts at the other stages of development (eggs and L4) of H contortus.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Eco Extraction

The fresh leaves of the three selected plants: M. charantia L. (Pawoka), C. papaya L. (Papaya) and Sargassum spp. (a mixture of Sargsassum natans (L.) Gaillon and Sargassum fluitans (Børgesen) Børgesen), where harvested in Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Sargassum was collected on the beach at Saint Felix (Guadeloupe). Plants were identified by the botanist of the University of Antilles (Dr. Alain Rousteau). Plant materials have been sorted. Only healthy, uncontaminated and unfazed leaves were selected. The collected leaves were thoroughly washed with water and air-dried at room temperature. These were stored in airtight bags and kept in the freezer at −20 °C until extraction.
The dried leaf samples were subjected to microwave extraction [42] using the ETHOS X extractor of Milestone-Easycontrol 480 (Sorisole, Italy). The leaves were first weighed, then cut and powdered to facilitate extraction. The plant matrix was then placed in the microwave oven reactor. A volume of distilled water equivalent to the mass was added. The volume of water will change depending on the characteristics of the powder (volume occupied, density, etc.…) when placed in the reactor. The microwave program was adjusted according to the mass of the plant matrix to be extracted (Table S1). The resulting crude products were collected and transferred to containers placed in the freezer until freeze-dried. The freeze-dried dry extracts were transferred to Falcon tubes and stored in the freezer at −20 °C.

3.2. Extraction of Chitin

The interaction of anthelmintic compounds with chitin was also explored as it is one of the major compounds of the parasite egg [43].
Lobster carcasses were coarsely cut and then ground into powder. The raw powder was demineralised, 500 g was weighed, and then the flask was placed in a flask containing 650 mL of 2 M HCl. The mixture was heated and held at about 60 °C for 72 h. The demineralised powder was filtered to remove the acid for subsequent deproteinisation; 650 mL of 2 M NaOH was added. The mixture was heated and maintained at 60 °C for 72 h. Finally, the deproteinised powder was filtered to perform discolouration; 650 mL of organic mixture: CHCl3/MeOH/H2O (1/2/4) was added [44].

3.3. Quantification of Total Polyphenols

The quantification of total polyphenols was determined by spectrophotometry using the colourimetric method and the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [45].
Reagent A (Folin-Ciocalteu) was diluted in a 1:10 ratio with distilled water. This dilution is called RA working solution. To each standard tube, 1.5 mL of reagent C (gallic acid) was added at 5 different concentrations (25, 50, 100, 200 and 300 µg/mL, see Table S2 and Figure S1).
Measurements were carried out on a Microplate Absorbance Reader iMarkTM BIO-RAD version V.0, software in End-point analysis protocol (Hercules, CA, USA).
Plant samples were diluted until they reached an absorbance within the limits of the standard curve. Standards were performed in the range of 0 to 300 µg/mL for a volume of 200 µL. 20 μL of each sample (standard and plants) were deposited in a microplate well. 100 μL of working solution and 80 μL of reagent B (7.5% sodium carbonate) were added to each well. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 750 nm. Quantitative analyses of total polyphenols were determined from the linear regression equation of the calibration curve, plotted using gallic acid as the standard (Table S2, Figure S1).

3.4. NMR-Based Structural Analysis and Metabolomics

Each sample was prepared in 5 mm NMR tubes using a few milligrams of the extract in 600 µL of D2O.
All the samples were measured at 300 K on a Bruker Avance Neo 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Wissembourg, France) equipped with a 5 mm BBI probe (Bruker BioSpin, Wissembourg, France) and a SampleJet automation sample changer(Bruker BioSpin, Wissembourg, France).
The spectra were acquired using a classical 1D 1H experiment in D2O. The data processing was performed using TopSpin 4.0.7. ChenomX NMR Suite 8.6 Professional was used to identify most of the compounds present in the natural extracts.

3.5. Biological Assay

The AH activity of the extracts was evaluated by performing the larval exsheathment inhibition assay [46] with a range of concentrations. The objective of the LEIA is to test the anthelmintic efficacy of plant extracts on the inhibition of the exsheathment of infesting H. contortus L3 larvae. L3 stage larvae were obtained by recovering and culturing eggs in faeces from animals experimentally infected with H. contortus at the animal experimental station of the French National Agricultural Research Institute, Guadeloupe (accreditation to experiment n°A971802). Animals were treated in accordance with the guidelines and regulations for animal experimentation of the French Ministry of Agriculture. The protocol (APAFIS#5527-2016050608133139v2) was validated by the Higher Education and Research under the advice of the Animal Care and Use Committee of French West Indies and Guyana (N°069).
The LEIA test consists of putting in artificial exsheathment of L3 larvae of H. contortus, following contact with the extracts to be tested. The effect of the extracts on exsheathment will be demonstrated by a significant inhibition of the latter. Bleach, also known as sodium hypochlorite, has properties similar to the secretions present in the stomach of ruminants, causing the larvae to have an artificial exsheathment. Twenty-one days post-infection, faeces were recovered and cultured for 5 days. The L3 larvae were extracted from the faeces by sedimentation using the Baermann technique [47]. In order to proceed with the test, the previously obtained larval suspension of sheated H. contortus was adjusted to a concentration of 1000 L3/mL in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4; 0.01 M).
Sheathed L3 of H. contortus (1 mL) were incubated for 3 h at room temperature with shaking with each of the extracts (1 mL) at different concentrations (5 mg/mL, 2.5 mg/mL, 1.25 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, and 0.25 mg/mL), all of which were diluted in PBS solution. L3 Larvae were also incubated in PBS control. After incubation, the larvae were washed by centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 5 min, three times in PBS. The larvae (100 µL) were then subjected to the process of artificial exsheathment by contact with a solution of 16.6% NaCl and 2.6% active chlorine bleach (1 mL) diluted at 1/140 (dilution required to allow full exsheathment of larvae after 70 min). After 70 min, 200 µL of each tube was removed after homogenisation and transferred into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes, into which 20 µL of lugol was previously dispensed. For each dose of the same extract and each PBS control, five replicates were performed. The contents of each tube were read under a light microscope at ×40 magnification, observing exsheathed and sheathed larvae. The percentage of exsheathed to sheathed larvae is calculated for each replicate of each extract according to the following formula: [Nb L3 exsheathed/(Nb L3 sheathed + Nb L3 exsheathed × 100)].
The obtained data were subjected to variance analysis. The p-value of the statistical test, set at 95%, is used to conclude equivalence of means. The concentration required to inhibit the biological response by 50% compared to the control (IC50) was estimated by performing Probit analysis of the dose-response curves of various plant extracts (using Minitab 18 software).

3.6. Electrochemical Screening

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) allows the evaluation of the properties of molecules via the detection and the characterisation of electroactive compounds and the study of chemical and electrochemical reaction mechanisms [48]. CV experiments were performed to test a methodology of electrochemical screening of AH properties of molecules and plant extracts via a heme-binding mechanism in an aqueous medium at biological pH [32] and to test the interactions between chitin and the different compounds. For this study, plus the 3 plants evaluated, 3 synthetic AH molecules (levamisole, thiabendazole and ivermectin) and 2 plant extracts (Leucaena leucocephala and Manihot esculenta) rich in condensed tannins and already known for their AH properties in animals [49,50,51] were assayed. The electrochemical study was carried out using a cell set-up consisting of a three-electrodes system (glassy carbon working electrode, Ag+/AgCl counter electrode and Platinum auxiliary electrode) immersed in the sample solution to be analysed and a potentiostat. A continuous and controlled potential was applied between the reference and the working electrodes. In this study, 10 mg of heme was weighed and then poured into the cell containing 5 mL of phosphate buffer (H3PO4, pH 7). The cell was put in an ultrasonic bath to homogenise for 5 min. For each sample of plant extracts or AH molecules to be tested, 2 mg was dissolved in ethanol in order to make a microparticle film on the working electrode. The different potentials of heme, sample and heme plus sample were measured. The same protocol was used for chitin [48].

4. Conclusions

This study highlights the anthelmintic potential of 3 plants from Guadeloupe’s biodiversity (M. charantia, C. papaya, Sargassum spp.) as an alternative to conventional chemical treatments against H. contortus.
The aqueous extracts obtained by eco-extraction, and in particular the M. charantia extract, have shown interesting biological activities against this intestinal parasite. These extracts could form part of the daily diet of ruminants. This bioactivity was linked to the quantification of total polyphenols and metabolomic analysis of the extracts.
At the same time, we developed an analytical method for electrochemical screening. This enabled us to explore different routes of action for compounds active against H. contortus, such as the interaction of potential anthelmintics with haem (cofactor of haemoglobin) based on the haematophagous nature of the parasite, and the interaction with chitin, a major compound in the parasite’s egg.
This analytical screening, confirmed by biological tests, represents an innovative, reliable and reproducible approach to this major veterinary problem.
In addition, the screening technique developed will be applied to several plants from our rich biodiversity with the aim of carrying out rapid and simple anti-parasite pre-screening. This pre-screening will make it possible to rapidly detect extracts or molecules with high HA potential before launching in vitro trials in order to optimise the time and cost of the experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph17060774/s1, Figure S1: Calibration curve for the quantification of gallic acid by the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent; Figure S2: Effect of Papaya extract on larval exsheatment of the H. contortus; Figure S3: Effect of Sargassum extract on larval exsheatment of the H. contortus; Figure S4: Effect of Pawoka extract on larval exsheatment of the H. contortus; Figure S5: Voltamogram of levimasole (heme interaction study); Figure S6: Voltamogram of thiabendazole (heme interaction study); Figure S7: Voltamogram of ivermectin (heme interaction study); Figure S8: Voltamogram of Leucene tannins (heme interaction study); Figure S9: Voltamogram of Manioc tannins (chitin interaction study); Figure S10: Voltamogram of Leucene tannins (chitin interaction study); Figure S11: Voltamogram of ivermectin (chitin interaction study); Figure S12: Voltamogram of levamisole (chitin interaction study); Figure S13: Voltamogram of Manioc tannins (chitin interaction study); Figure S14: Voltamogram of thiabenzadole (chitin interaction study); Table S1: Microwave program adjusted according to the mass of the plant matrix; Table S2: Preparation of the calibration range.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.C.-T.; Investigation, T.C., C.M.-M., L.P., C.C., G.B., N.G., G.C.-T. and M.S.; Writing—original draft, C.M.-M. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by PO-FEDER through the Project «Co-design of efficient and resilient agricultural production systems for the territories of Guadeloupe, in an agroecological approach» (AgroEcoDiv), grant number 2019-FED-84.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Patrick Jean-Louis, Assistant Engineer at the Institute of Systematics, Evolution and Biodiversity (ISYEB), UMR 7205, University of the French West Indies, Fouillole Campus, UFR SEN, 97157 Pointe-à-Pitre, France for his technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tayo, G.M.; Poné, J.W.; Komtangi, M.C.; Yondo, J.; Ngangout, A.M.; Mbida, M. Anthelminthic Activity of Moringa oleifera Leaf Extracts Evaluated in vitro on Four Developmental Stages of Haemonchus contortus from Goats. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 1702–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Botura, M.B.; Silva, G.D.; Lima, H.G.; Oliveira, J.V.A.; Souza, T.S.; Santos, J.D.G.; Branco, A.; Moreira, E.L.T.; Almeida, M.A.O.; Batatinha, M.J.M. In vivo anthelmintic activity of an aqueous extract from sisal waste (Agave sisalana Perr.) against gastrointestinal nematodes in goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 177, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cabardo, D.E.; Portugaliza, H.P. Anthelmintic activity of Moringa oleifera seed aqueous and ethanolic extracts against Haemonchus contortus eggs and third stage larvae. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2017, 5, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. del Carmen Acevedo-Ramírez, P.M.; Hallal-Calleros, C.; Flores-Pérez, I.; Alba-Hurtado, F.; Mendoza-Garfías, M.B.; Castro Del Campo, N.; Barajas, R. Anthelmintic effect and tissue alterations induced in vitro by hydrolysable tannins on the adult stage of the gastrointestinal nematode Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 266, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zenebe, S.; Feyera, T.; Assefa, S. In Vitro Anthelmintic Activity of Crude Extracts of Aerial Parts of Cissus quadrangularis L. and Leaves of Schinus molle L. against Haemonchus contortus. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1905987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lubega, G.W.; Prichard, R.K. Specific interaction of benzimidazole anthelmintics with tubulin from developing stages of thiabendazole-susceptible and-resistant Haemonchus contortus. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991, 41, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zabré, G.; Kaboré, A.; Bayala, B.; Katiki, L.M.; Costa-Júnior, L.M.; Tamboura, H.H.; Belem, A.M.G.; Abdalla, A.L.; Niderkorn, V.; Hoste, H.; et al. Comparison of the in vitro anthelmintic effects of Acacia nilotica and Acacia raddiana. Parasite 2017, 24, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sangster, N.C.; Bjorn, H. Levamisole resistance of Haemonchus contortus Selected at Different Stages of Infection. Int. J. Parasitol. 1995, 25, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boulin, T.; Fauvin, A.; Charvet, C.L.; Cortet, J.; Cabaret, J.; Bessereau, J.-L.; Neveu, C. Functional reconstitution of Haemonchus contortus acetylcholine receptors in Xenopus oocytes provides mechanistic insights into levamisole resistance. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 164, 1421–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chagas, A.C.S.; Figueiredo, A.; Politi, F.A.S.; Moro, I.J.; Esteves, S.N.; Bizzo, H.R.; Gama, P.E.; Chaves, F.C.M. Efficacy of essential oils from plants cultivated in the Amazonian Biome against gastrointestinal nematodes in sheep. J. Parasit. Dis. Off. Organ Indian Soc. Parasitol. 2018, 42, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hoste, H.; Martinez-Ortiz-De-Montellano, C.; Manolaraki, F.; Brunet, S.; Ojeda-Robertos, N.; Fourquaux, I.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A. Direct and indirect effects of bioactive tannin-rich tropical and temperate legumes against nematode infections. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 186, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Joshi, B.; Panda, S.K.; Jouneghani, R.S.; Liu, M.; Parajuli, N.; Leyssen, P.; Neyts, J.; Luyten, W. Antibacterial, Antifungal, Antiviral, and Anthelmintic Activities of Medicinal Plants of Nepal Selected Based on Ethnobotanical Evidence. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. ECAM 2020, 2020, 1043471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kaplan, R.M. Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: A status report. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arsenopoulos, K.V.; Fthenakis, G.C.; Katsarou, E.I.; Papadopoulos, E. Haemonchosis: A Challenging Parasitic Infection of Sheep and Goats. Animals 2021, 11, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mahieu, M.; Ferré, B.; Madassamy, M.; Mandonnet, N. Fifteen years later, anthelmintic resistances have dramatically spread over goat farms in Guadeloupe. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 205, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Birhan, M.; Gesses, T.; Kenubih, A.; Dejene, H.; Yayeh, M. Evaluation of Anthelminthic Activity of Tropical Taniferous Plant Extracts Against Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Med. Res. Rep. 2020, 11, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, G.; Singh, R.; Verma, P.K.; Singh, R.; Anand, A. Anthelmintic efficacy of aqueous extract of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze against Haemonchus contortus of sheep and goats. J. Parasit. Dis. Off. Organ Indian Soc. Parasitol. 2015, 39, 200–205. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rochfort, S.; Parker, A.J.; Dunshea, F.R. Plant bioactives for ruminant health and productivity. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 299–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eguale, T.; Giday, M. In vitro anthelmintic activity of three medicinal plants against Haemonchus contortus. Int. J. Green Pharm. 2009, 3, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Santos, F.O.; Cerqueira, A.P.M.; Branco, A.; Batatinha, M.J.M.; Botura, M.B. Anthelmintic activity of plants against gastrointestinal nematodes of goats: A review. Parasitology 2019, 146, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Spiegler, V.; Liebau, E.; Hensel, A. Medicinal plant extracts and plant-derived polyphenols with anthelmintic activity against intestinal nematodes: Review. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2017, 34, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oliveira, A.F.; Costa Junior, L.M.; Lima, A.S.; Silva, C.R.; Ribeiro, M.N.S.; Mesquista, J.W.C.; Rocha, C.Q.; Tangerina, M.M.P.; Vilegas, W. Anthelmintic activity of plant extracts from Brazilian savanna. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 236, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Monteiro, M.V.B.; Bevilaqua, C.M.L.; Morais, S.M.; Machado, L.K.A.; Camurça-Vasconcelos, A.L.F.; Campello, C.C.; Ribeiro, W.L.C.; Mesquita, M.d.A. Anthelmintic activity of Jatropha curcas L. seeds on Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 182, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Engström, M.T.; Karonen, M.; Ahern, J.R.; Baert, N.; Payré, B.; Hoste, H.; Salminen, J.-P. Chemical Structures of Plant Hydrolyzable Tannins Reveal Their in Vitro Activity against Egg Hatching and Motility of Haemonchus contortus Nematodes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 840–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mravčáková, D.; Komáromyová, M.; Babják, M.; Dolinská, M.U.; Königová, A.; Daniel Petrič, D.; Čobanová, K.; Ślusarczyk, S.; Cieslak, A.; Várady, M.; et al. Anthelmintic Activity of Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium L.) and Mallow (Malva sylvestris L.) against Haemonchus contortus in Sheep. Animals 2020, 10, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jato, J.; Waindok, P.; Ngnodandi Belga, F.; Orman, E.; Agyare, C.; Oppong Bekoe, E.; Strube, C.; Hensel, A.; Liebau, E.; Spiegler, V. Anthelmintic Activities of Extract and Ellagitannins from Phyllanthus urinaria against Caenorhabditis elegans and Zoonotic or Animal Parasitic Nematodes. Planta Med. 2023, 89, 1215–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Escareño-Díaz, S.; Alonso-Díaz, M.A.; Mendoza de Gives, P.; Castillo-Gallegos, E.; von Son-de Fernex, E. Anthelmintic-like activity of polyphenolic compounds and their interactions against the cattle nematode Cooperia punctate. Vet Parasitol. 2019, 274, 108909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Molla, S.H.; Bandyopadhyay, P.K. In vitro and in vivo anthelmintic activity of Murraya koenigii against gastro-intestinal nematodes of sheep. J. Parasit. Dis. 2016, 40, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baihaqi, Z.A.; Widiyono, I.; Nurcahyo, W. In vitro anthelmintic activity of aqueous and ethanol extracts of Paraserianthes falcataria bark waste against Haemonchus contortus obtained from a local slaughterhouse in Indonesia. Vet. World 2020, 13, 1549–1554. [Google Scholar]
  30. Oliveira, M.; Lima, C.S.; Ketavong, S.; Llorent-Martínez, E.J.; Hoste, H.; Custódio, L. Disclosing the bioactive metabolites involved in the in vitro anthelmintic effects of salt-tolerant plants through a combined approach using PVPP and HPLC-ESI-MS. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 24303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Karonen, M.; Ahern, J.R.; Legroux, L.; Suvanto, J.; Engström, M.T.; Sinkkonen, J.; Salminen, J.-P.; Hoste, H. Ellagitannins Inhibit the Exsheathment of Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis Larvae: The Efficiency Increases Together with the Molecular Size. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 4176–4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martínez-Ortiz-de-Montellano, C.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Fourquaux, I.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Hoste, H. Ultrastructural study of adult Haemonchus contortus exposed to polyphenol-rich materials under in vivo conditions in goats. Parasite 2019, 26, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Maestrini, M.; Tava, A.; Mancini, S.; Tedesco, D.; Perrucci, S. In Vitro Anthelmintic Activity of Saponins from Medicago spp. Against Sheep Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Molecules 2020, 25, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beloin, N.; Gbeassor, M.; Akpagana, K.; Hudson, J.; de Soussa, K.; Koumaglo, K.; Arnason, J.T. Ethnomedicinal uses of Momordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae) in Togo and relation to its phytochemistry and biological activity. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 96, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kubola, J.; Siriamornpun, S. Phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) leaf, stem and fruit fraction extracts in vitro. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goku, P.E.; Orman, E.; Quartey, A.N.K.; Ansong, G.T.; Asare-Gyan, E.B. Comparative Evaluation of the In Vitro Anthelminthic Effects of the Leaves, Stem, and Seeds of Carica papaya (Linn) Using the Pheretima posthuma Model. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 9717304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yap, J.Y.; Hii, C.L.; Ong, S.P.; Lim, K.H.; Abas, F.; Pin, K.Y. Effects of drying on total polyphenols content and antioxidant properties of Carica papaya leaves. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2932–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abdel-Halim, S.; Ibrahim, M.; Mohsen, M.A.; Abou-Setta, L.; Sleem, A.; El-Missiry, M. The influence of the extraction method on polyphenols, flavonoids composition and anti-hyperlipidemic properties of papaya leaves (Carica papaya L.). Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2021, 45, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, J.; Luthuli, S.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Choi, J.-I.; Tong, H. Therapeutic and nutraceutical potentials of a brown seaweed Sargassum fusiforme. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 5195–5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mayer, A.M.S.; Rodríguez, A.D.; Berlinck, R.G.S.; Fusetani, N. Marine pharmacology in 2007–8: Marine compounds with antibacterial, anticoagulant, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antimalarial, antiprotozoal, antituberculosis, and antiviral activities; affecting the immune and nervous system, and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2011, 153, 191–222. [Google Scholar]
  41. Dashtiannasab, A.; Kakoolaki, S.; Sharif Rohani, M.; Yeganeh, V. In vitro effects of Sargassum latifolium (Agardeh, 1948) againstselected bacterial pathogens of shrimp. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2012, 11, 765–775. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chemat, F.; Cravotto, G. Microwave-Assisted Extraction for Bioactive Compounds: Theory and Practice; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mansfield, L.S.; Gamble, H.R.; Fetterer, R.H. Characterization of the eggshell of Haemonchus contortus—I. Structural components. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 1992, 103, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Percot, A.; Viton, C.; Domard, A. Optimization of Chitin Extraction from Shrimp Shells. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sánchez-Rangel, J.C.; Benavides, J.; Heredia, J.B.; Luis Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A. The Folin-Ciocalteu assay revisited: Improvement of its specificity for total phenolic content determination. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 5990–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bahuaud, D.; Martinez-ortiz de Montellano, C.; Chauveau, S.; Prevot, F.; Torres-Acosta, F.; Fouraste, I.; Hoste, H. Effects of four tanniferous plant extracts on the in vitro exsheathment of third-stage larvae of parasitic nematodes. Parasitology 2006, 132, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Beane, R.D.; Hobbs, N.T. The Baermann technique for estimating Protostrongylus infection in bighorn sheep: Effect of laboratory procedures. J. Wildl. Dis. 1983, 19, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Doménech-Carbό, A.; Maciuk, A.; Figadère, B.; Poupon, E.; Cebrián-Torrejón, G. Solid-State Electrochemical Assay of Heme-Binding Molecules for Screening of Drugs with Antimalarial Potential. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 4014–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Minatchy, N.; Marie-Magdeleine, C.; Garin, M.; Nimir, F.; Romil-Granville, D.; Philibert, L.; Calif, V.; Bambou, J.-C.; Archimède, H. Nutraceutical properties of Leucaena leucocephala, Manihot esculenta, Cajanus cajan and a foliage blend in goat kids infected with Haemonchus contortus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marie-Magdeleine, C.; Udino, L.; Philibert, L.; Bocage, B.; Archimede, H. In vitro effects of Cassava (Manihot esculenta) leaf extracts on four development stages of Haemonchus contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 173, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Marie-Magdeleine, C.; Ceriac, S.; Barde, D.J.; Minatchy, N.; Periacarpin, F.; Pommier, F.; Calif, B.; Philibert, L.; Bambou, J.-C.; Archimède, H. Evaluation of nutraceutical properties of Leucaena leucocephala leaf pellets fed to goat kids infected with Haemonchus contortus. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae) (A); Carica papaya L. (Caricaceae) (B); Sargassum spp. (Sargassaceae) (C).
Figure 1. Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae) (A); Carica papaya L. (Caricaceae) (B); Sargassum spp. (Sargassaceae) (C).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00774 g001
Figure 2. 1H NMR Spectrum of aqueous extract of Sargassum: characterisation of mannitol (A); Papaya: characterisation of chlorogenate (B); Pawoka: characterisation of trigonelline (C).
Figure 2. 1H NMR Spectrum of aqueous extract of Sargassum: characterisation of mannitol (A); Papaya: characterisation of chlorogenate (B); Pawoka: characterisation of trigonelline (C).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00774 g002aPharmaceuticals 17 00774 g002b
Figure 3. Dose-effect of extracts on larval exsheatment of the H. contortus (A); Effect of Papaya, Sargassum and Pawoka extracts on larval exsheatment of the H. contortus parasite at 5 mg/mL concentration (B).
Figure 3. Dose-effect of extracts on larval exsheatment of the H. contortus (A); Effect of Papaya, Sargassum and Pawoka extracts on larval exsheatment of the H. contortus parasite at 5 mg/mL concentration (B).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00774 g003
Figure 4. Voltamogram of: Pawoka (heme interaction study) (A); Sargassum (heme interaction study) (B); Papaya extract (heme interaction study) (C); Papaya extract (chitin interaction study) (D); Pawoka extract (chitin interaction study) (E); Sargassum extract (chitin interaction study) (F).
Figure 4. Voltamogram of: Pawoka (heme interaction study) (A); Sargassum (heme interaction study) (B); Papaya extract (heme interaction study) (C); Papaya extract (chitin interaction study) (D); Pawoka extract (chitin interaction study) (E); Sargassum extract (chitin interaction study) (F).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00774 g004aPharmaceuticals 17 00774 g004bPharmaceuticals 17 00774 g004c
Table 1. Optical densities (OD) of Plant extracts and standard range and concentrations of polyphenols.
Table 1. Optical densities (OD) of Plant extracts and standard range and concentrations of polyphenols.
SampleAverage OD (750 nm)Gallic Acid Concentration (µg/mL)
S100
S20.150025
S30.261550
S40.3325100
S50.8635200
S61.2100300
Sargassum (1/10)0.108022.125
Papaya (1/10)0.6320153.125
Pawoka (1/10)0.360785.300
Table 2. Compound characterisation by 1H NMR of Sargassum sample (A); Papaya sample (B); and Pawoka sample (C).
Table 2. Compound characterisation by 1H NMR of Sargassum sample (A); Papaya sample (B); and Pawoka sample (C).
A.
Compound NameRelative Concentration (mM) in Sargassum
Mannitol0.3474
Alanine0.0096
Glutamate0.0092
Glutamine0.0090
Aspartate0.0060
Acetate0.0026
Valine0.0024
Lactate0.0011
Formate0.0008
B.
Compound NameRelative Concentration (mM) in Papaya
Glucose88.1664
Malate35.2627
Asparagine10.2431
Alanine8.7825
4-aminobutyrate4.7034
Chlorogenate4.1628
Valine2.1308
Trigonelline2.0848
Leucine1.9908
Lactate1.8929
Isoleucine1.3825
Formate1.3148
Uridine0.9758
S-Adenosylhomocysteine0.7200
C.
CompoundsRelative Concentration (mM) in Pawoka
Acetate6.5881
Fructose5.5754
Glucose3.6688
2-Octenoate2.8576
Gluconate2.3584
Galactose1.4728
Aspartate1.3986
Alanine1.3960
Formate1.0814
Succinate1.0653
2-Hydroxybutyrate1.0585
Propionate0.9949
4-aminobutyrate0.9265
Choline0.8408
Glutamate0.6515
Valine0.6485
Methanol0.6405
Lactate0.5504
Leucine0.4479
Asparagine0.4321
Fumarate0.4159
Isoleucine0.3571
Uridine0.3504
Phenylalanine0.1766
Trigonelline0.1533
Benzoate0.1301
Tyrosine0.0534
2-Hydroxyphenylacetate0.0454
Tryptophan0.0287
Table 3. An average percentage of H. contortus parasite larval exsheatment was observed following contact of the parasites with the extracts and the control (PBS) and IC50.
Table 3. An average percentage of H. contortus parasite larval exsheatment was observed following contact of the parasites with the extracts and the control (PBS) and IC50.
Average Percentage of Exsheatment (%)IC50 (mg/mL)
Control PBS
PBS Pawoka94.04-
PBS Papaya97.69-
PBS Sargassum95.36-
Plant extracts
Pawoka40.211.148
Papaya79.274.161
Sargassum57.371.980
Table 4. Potentials of different plant samples for the study of interaction with heme.
Table 4. Potentials of different plant samples for the study of interaction with heme.
SamplePotential of Heme
(mV)
Potential of Heme + Samples
(mV)
Potential of Samples
(Control, mV)
Ivermectin−0.20−0.72−0.60
Levamisole−0.20−0.16−0.18
Thiabendazole−0.20−0.20−0.36
Leucene tannins−0.20−0.44−0.42
Manioc tannins−0.20−0.40−0.40
Papaya−0.20−0.52−0.60
Pawoka−0.20−0.28−0.60
Sargassum−0.20−0.36−0.56
Table 5. Potentials of different samples for the study of interaction with chitin.
Table 5. Potentials of different samples for the study of interaction with chitin.
SamplePotential of Chitin
(mV)
Potentiel of Chitin + Samples
(mV)
Potential of Samples
(Control, mV)
Ivermectin−0.40−0.70−0.65
Levamisole−0.40−0.65−0.25
Thiabendazole−0.40−0.90−0.40
Leucene tannins−0.40−0.50−0.80
Manioc tannins−0.40−0.75−0.75
Papaya−0.40−0.85−1
Pawoka−0.40−1.10−0.85
Sargassum−0.40−0.90−0.80
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cabald, T.; Marie-Magdeleine, C.; Philibert, L.; Caradeuc, C.; Bertho, G.; Giraud, N.; Cebrián-Torrejón, G.; Sylvestre, M. Phytochemical Study of the Anthelminthic Potential of Guadeloupean Plant Biodiversity. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17060774

AMA Style

Cabald T, Marie-Magdeleine C, Philibert L, Caradeuc C, Bertho G, Giraud N, Cebrián-Torrejón G, Sylvestre M. Phytochemical Study of the Anthelminthic Potential of Guadeloupean Plant Biodiversity. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(6):774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17060774

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cabald, Tressy, Carine Marie-Magdeleine, Lucien Philibert, Cédric Caradeuc, Gildas Bertho, Nicolas Giraud, Gerardo Cebrián-Torrejón, and Muriel Sylvestre. 2024. "Phytochemical Study of the Anthelminthic Potential of Guadeloupean Plant Biodiversity" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 6: 774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17060774

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop