Next Article in Journal
Permeability of Gemcitabine and PBPK Modeling to Assess Oral Administration
Previous Article in Journal
Gene Expression Studies in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Samples of Cutaneous Cancer: The Need for Reference Genes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

De Novo Assembly and Species-Specific Marker Development as a Useful Tool for the Identification of Scutellaria L. Species

1
Central R&D Center, B&Tech Co., Ltd., Gwangju 61239, Korea
2
College of Korean Medicine, Dongshin University, Naju-si 58245, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 43(3), 2177-2188; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb43030152
Submission received: 13 September 2021 / Revised: 17 November 2021 / Accepted: 29 November 2021 / Published: 1 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Bioinformatics and Systems Biology)

Abstract

:
Scutellaria L. (family Lamiaceae) includes approximately 470 species found in most parts of the world and is commonly known as skullcaps. Scutellaria L. is a medicinal herb used as a folk remedy in Korea and East Asia, but it is difficult to identify and classify various subspecies by morphological methods. Since Scutellaria L. has not been studied genetically, to expand the knowledge of species in the genus Scutellaria L., de novo whole-genome assembly was performed in Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi using the Illumina sequencing platform. We aimed to develop a molecular method that could be used to classify S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi, S. indica L. and three other Scutellaria L. species. The assembly results for S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi revealed a genome size of 318,741,328 bp and a scaffold N50 of 78,430. The assembly contained 92.08% of the conserved BUSCO core gene set and was estimated to cover 94.65% of the genome. The obtained genes were compared with previously registered Scutellaria nucleotide sequences and similar regions using the NCBI BLAST service, and a total of 279 similar nucleotide sequences were detected. By selecting the 279 similar nucleotide sequences and nine chloroplast DNA barcode genes, primers were prepared so that the size of the PCR product was 100 to 1000 bp. As a result, a species-specific primer set capable of distinguishing five species of Scutellaria L. was developed.

1. Introduction

Scutellaria L. is a genus of annual or perennial herbaceous plants belonging to the family Lamiaceae. Members of this genus live in temperate regions and approximately 470 species are known [1,2,3], with some used as folk remedies in Korea and East Asia. To date, it has been confirmed that extracts of the genus Scutellaria have antitumor, hepatoprotective, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, antibacterial and antiviral effects [4]. In Korea, 17 species of the genus Scutellaria are known to grow wild and several subspecies have been reported in addition to these species [5]. However, subspecies of Scutellaria L. may be confused because of their morphological similarities. For this reason, certain Scutellaria L. species used in pharmaceuticals and foods are very commonly used interchangeably. Therefore, it is necessary to classify and identify these taxa molecularly rather than morphologically. Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi is a representative species of the genus Scutellaria and has efficacy in diarrhea, dysentery, hypertension, hemorrhaging, insomnia, inflammation and respiratory infections. Scutellaria barbata D. Don is also known as “Ban Zhi Lian” in China and “Banjiryun” in Korea, has been used for inflammations, hemoptysis, hematuria, stomach pain and mosquito bites. Scutellaria indica L. was employed for analgesia, detoxification, promoting blood circulation effects in China, Korea and India. The differences in efficacy traditionally used for each of these species actually led to differences in the constituent compounds. In addition, Scutellaria indica L., Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi and Scutellaria pekinensis var. transtra (Makino) H. Hara is commonly referred to as “skullcaps”. These are subspecies with very similar phenotypes and are easily mixed and misused. For this reason, accurate identification and classification of each species is required not only in academia but also in industrial fields such as drug development using natural products [4,6]. However, genetic research on the genus Scutellaria is not active and only a small number of genes are registered in the NCBI GenBank database.
Molecular markers have been widely applied as useful tools to assess genetic variation or to classify species and have improved the genetic analysis of plants [7]. These molecular markers include random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), ribosomal DNA (rDNA), simple sequence repeat (ISSR), sequence characterization amplification region (SCAR) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. In particular, SSRs are used as genetic markers for studies such as parentage analysis, fingerprinting, genetic structural analysis and genetic mapping due to their reproducible polymorphic features [15,16,17].
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology is advancing rapidly to create sequencing libraries and build effective solutions for data analysis [15]. Deep sequencing and de novo assembly using RNA sequencing technology has become an alternative to genomic sequencing for protein discovery and phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis in organisms [18]. Furthermore, it has accelerated the development of genome-wide SSRs or microsatellites that can be used more quickly and efficiently, even in non-model plants with limited background genetic information. For this reason, NGS is performed for the development of genetic markers. Recently, the successful generation of transcriptome data through NGS for the development of SSR markers in non-model plants lacking a reference genome has been reported successfully [7,14,19].
In this study, we performed de novo whole-genome assembly of Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi. We aimed to develop an accurate set of markers for identification through genetic analysis of S. indica L. and S. indica var. tsusimensis, which are difficult to distinguish visually.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Genomic DNA Extraction

Samples of five Scutellaria L. species with different leaf shapes were collected from Gangjin County (Jeollanamdo, Korea). Total genomic DNA was extracted from five dried Scutellaria L. leaves (100 mg) using a Plant DNeasy Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Sample 3 additionally extracted RNA for WGS, and RNA extraction was performed using a universal RNA extraction kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Only Sample 3 was performed WGS, and the DNA of the other four samples was used only for the identification of species-specific primers.

2.2. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification

The reaction for PCR amplification using primers included 0.5 μL of Taq polymerase (nTaq Mg2+, Enzynomics, Daejeon, Korea), 2 μL of 10× nTaq buffer, 2 μL of dNTP mixture (2.5 mM), 1 μL of forward primer (10 pmole), 1 μL of reverse primer (10 pmole) and 2 μL of quantified template DNA (5 ng/μL) mixed together, and purified water was added to reach a final reaction volume of 20 μL. PCR conditions included predenaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 42–55 °C for 30 s, amplification at 72 °C for 30 s and denaturation. After repeating the process up to amplification 30 times, a final extension step was performed at 72 °C for 10 min to obtain a DNA amplification product. The DNA amplification product was dripped on a 2% agarose gel and electrophoresed for 30 min, and when species specificity was confirmed, it was used for species differentiation.

2.3. Sequel Library Construction

A sample of high-quality and high-molecular-weight DNA is required to prepare size-selected (approximately 20 kb) SMRTbell templates. We used PicoGreen to measure the concentration of genomic DNA. All samples passed the QC screening criteria. For PacBio Sequel sequencing, 8 μg of input genomic DNA was used for 20 kb library preparation. For gDNA with a size range less than 17 kb, we used a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) to determine the actual size distribution. The library insert sizes were in the optimal size range, and we sheared gDNA with a g-TUBE (Covaris Inc., Woburn, MA, USA) and purified it using AMPurePB magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) if the apparent size was greater than 40 kb. A 10 μL library was prepared using the PacBio SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). SMRTbell templates were annealed using Sequel Binding and Internal Ctrl Kit 3.0 (Pacific Biosciences). The Sequel Sequencing Kit 3.0 and SMRT Cells 1M v3 Tray were used for sequencing. Movies (600 min) of each SMRT Cell (Pacific Biosciences) were captured using the PacBio Sequel (Pacific Biosciences) sequencing platform by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea).
For the analysis, Illumina short read sequences were generated by the Illumina HiSeq XTen platform and PacBio long read sequences were generated by the PacBio Sequel system. Illumina short reads were assembled into contigs using Platanus-allee 2.2.2 [20] with a 51 initial k-mer size and 0.8 maximum k-mer factor. The contigs were subjected to scaffolding and gap filling using PacBio long read sequences by PBJelly 15.8.24 [21]. To assess assembly quality, BUSCO [22] (based on evolutionarily informed expectations of the gene content of near-universal single-copy orthologs) analysis was performed using BUSCO 3.0 with eukaryote odb version 9. Additionally, Illumina short reads were aligned against the gap-filled scaffolds to calculate the mapping ratio, mapping coverage and insert size for assessment. MAKER 3.01.03 [23] was used to predict genes from the gap-filled scaffolds based on the SNAP model. For additional annotation, the consensus sequences were searched against the GenBank nonredundant (NR), UniProt, GO, InterPro, Pfam, CD, TIGRFAM and EggNOG 4.5 databases [24] using blast [25] v2.6.0+.

2.4. Preparation of Species-Specific Primers Using Barcode DNA

The chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) barcodes of five species of Scutellaria registered in the NCBI GenBank database were analyzed. Specific primers were designed by aligning each nucleotide sequence with CLC Sequence Viewer to search for nucleotide sequences (single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), deletions, insertions) that appeared only in the relevant species. To increase specificity when preparing a specific primer, a SNP was placed at the 3′-end, and the third nucleotide sequence was mismatched to the 5′-side therefrom to prepare a specific primer. In addition, the nucleotide sequence obtained through WGS de novo assembly was matched with the previously registered nucleotide sequence of the genus Scutellaria using the NCBI BLAST service. With the matching result, the primer was designed so that the PCR amplification product was 100 bp to 1000 bp using Primer-BLAST.

3. Results

3.1. Leaf Profiles of Five Species of Scutellaria L.

The leaf shape of five different species of Scutellaria L. is shown in Figure 1. Sample 1 has medium-sized leaves of 2–3.5 cm. The leaves are thin, there is almost no depression of the upper leaf veins, and the leaves are heart-shaped, almost round. Sample 2 has large leaves of 1.3–3.8 cm. The pulses on the upper side are not clear but the pulses on the lower side are protruding. The leaf is cordate, the leaf apex and base are acute, and the edge of the leaf has approximately 10 pairs of sharp serrated teeth. Sample 3 is very similar to Sample 1 but the veins are distinct, and the leaf shape is closer to the heart shape than that of Sample 1. The petiole of Sample 4 is narrow triangular-ovate to slightly tentacle-shaped, 1.2–2.5 cm long and 0.6–1.5 cm wide. It is apically acute, basal broadly wedge-shaped to sharp, with margins dull and shallow, 3–4 toothed, matte, and rarely with down along the veins. Sample 5 leaves are lanceolate with a length of 2.7–5.2 cm and a width of 0.6–1.1 cm, the leaf apex is acute, and the leaf base is rounded. In particular, it is very difficult to distinguish the species because the leaf size, shape and stem characteristics of Sample 1 and Sample 3 are very similar. Combining their characteristics, Sample 1 and Sample 3 are S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi or S. indica L. Sample 2 has the characteristics of S. pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara. Sample 4 has the characteristics of S. barbata D. Don. Sample 5 has the characteristics of S. baicalensis Georgi. However, their species could not be determined by the shape of the leaves. Therefore, a method was developed to confirm the species through whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis of Sample 3, and to use it to confirm the species by using the genetic characteristics of other species.

3.2. RNA-Seq-Based De Novo Assembly of Sample 3

The total number of bases and reads, and GC (%), Q20 (%) and Q30 (%) values were calculated for the DNA sample. From the DNA, 973,624,734 reads were produced, and the total number of bases was 147,017,334,834. The GC content was 37.4% and the Q30 value was 90.45%. Trimmomatic was used to remove adapter sequences and low-quality reads to reduce biases in the analysis. After filtering the DNA sample, 749,527,438 reads were generated for a total of 112,735,647,909 bases. The GC content was 36.69% and the Q30 value was 96.49% (Table 1). If the amount of filtered data is more than 150-fold the genome size estimated by the genome survey, then the data were randomly subsampled to 150-fold the genome size in order to reduce the negative effect of too much data. The base quality plot generated by FastQC was used to check the overall quality of the produced data. This plot shows the range of quality values at each cycle. The x-axis and y-axis are the number of cycles and Phred quality score (Q-score), respectively (Figure 2).

3.3. K-Mer Analysis

Prior to assembly, k-mer analysis was performed to estimate the genome size of the sample. Sharp left peaks indicate random sequencing errors, right peaks indicate adequate data and genome size can be estimated using total k-mer counts and volume peaks (Figure 3). The genome size estimation for Sample 3 using k-mer analysis is presented in Figure 3. A k-mer size of 21 was used for genome size estimation. A peak measured at half the peak depth showed a heterozygosity of 0.404 for Sample 3. The genomic sequence repeat length for Sample 3 was obtained by calculating the ratio of 1.8-fold the number of k-mers after the main peak to the total number of k-mers (Table 2).

3.4. Assembly Results

The best k-mer was selected by the status of the assembled results such as the number of contigs, contig sum and contig N50. As shown in Table 3, the number of identified contigs was 19,521, with a total of 298,515,080 bases. The contig N50 was 42,020. An N50 means that half of all bases reside in contigs of this size or longer. The longest contig was 411,840, the shortest was 1000 and the average length of the contigs was 15,260. Additionally, in the case of the assembled scaffolds, 14,625 scaffolds with 318,741,328 bases were identified, the N50 value was 78,430 and the average scaffold length was 21,794. The longest scaffold was 803,009 and the shortest scaffold was 1000.

3.5. Self-Mapping Results

To determine the insert size of the raw data and how many reads were used in the assembly, raw reads were mapped to the assembly results. As shown in Table 4, a total of 749,527,438 bases were read, and the number of bases read in the mapping was 655,896,731, accounting for approximately 87.51%. After mapping, the necessary statistics were calculated. The depth representing the number of times each gene was sequenced was calculated to be 276.51. When the depth is 80–150× of the genome size, it is possible to guarantee high accuracy and reliability by preventing substitution of the wrong nucleotide due to sequencing error; however, too great a depth (higher than 200×) can cause negative effects during assembly because sequencing error bases with high depth cannot be distinguished from normal bases. The percentage of the genomes covered by the reads was 94.65%. The adapter sequences were removed from the library, which consists of paired-end reads (Read 1, Read 2) and internal mate regions. The insert size of the sequence calculated from the mapping result was 475 bp. In general, inserts of paired-end libraries have sizes between 350 and 450 bp and are distributed in the form of a standard normal distribution.

3.6. Blast Results

After the complete genome or draft genome was assembled, BLAST analysis was carried out to identify to which species each scaffold showed similarity. The best hit and top five hit results were identified using the NCBI NT database. As a result of BLAST, 45.03% of the samples had no hits and the Sesamum genus was the most matched, with a rate of 16.31%. Ipomoea showed a rate of 8.62%, Erythranthe a rate of 4.59%, Scutellaria a rate of 1.94% and other genera, a rate of 23.50% (Figure 4).

3.7. BUSCO Results

To assess the completeness of the genome assembly, Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) analysis was performed based on evolutionarily informed expectations of gene content from near-universal single-copy orthologs. By default, bacteria or eukaryotic DB was used for analysis. As shown in Table 5, 303 total BUSCO groups were searched. There were 279 complete BUSCOs (92.08%). Of these, 229 single-copy BUSCOs (75.58%) and 50 duplicate-copy BUSCOs (16.50%) were analyzed. The number of fragmented BUSCOs, which were only partially recovered matches, was 4 (1.32%). There were 20 missing BUSCOs without a match, representing a rate of 6.60%.

3.8. Gene Prediction and Annotation Results

After the complete genome or draft genome was assembled, the locations of protein-coding genes were predicted, and their functions were annotated. MAKER was used to predict genes in the draft genome, and the InterProScan, UniProt and EggNOG databases were used to annotate the functions of the genes. As shown in Figure 5, a total of 23,814 genes were identified by MAKER. The numbers of identified CDSs, tRNAs and rRNAs were 22,788, 670 and 356, respectively (Table 6). In EggNOG functional classification, a total of 23,716 unigenes were classified into 25 categories. Among them, “function unknown” was the largest group (12,200, 51.44%). This was followed by “Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones” (1565, 6.59%), “Transcription” (1500, 6.32%), “Signal transduction mechanisms” (1312, 5.53%) and “Carbohydrate transport and metabolism” (3861, 5.15%).

3.9. Validation of Species-Specific Primers Using Barcode DNA

The assembled DNA was searched for species-specific primers. As a result of BLAST, nine chloroplast DNA loci were selected among 279 nucleotides and annotated genes matched in Scutellaria species. All the transcripts containing detected nucleotides and chloroplast DNA were subjected to primer design with Primer3. Among the resulting large number of primer pairs, 4 primers that specifically amplified DNA in 3 species were selected (Table 7). As shown in Figure 6A, the SL primer (945 bp) amplified DNA for both CYC2B of S. indica L. and S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi. The SP primer (173 bp) amplified DNA specifically for PsbA of S. pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara (Figure 6B). The ST1 and ST2 primers (491 bp and 444 bp, respectively) amplified DNA specifically for atpI_0 and rbcL_3, respectively, of S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi (Figure 6C,D). The SD1 and SD2 primers (939 bp and 77 bp, respectively) did not amplify sequences specific to S. barbata D. Don (Figure 6E,F). The SB primers (218 bp) amplified chloroplast DNA of S. baicalensis Georgi (Figure 6G). Although no primers specifically amplified DNA in S. indica L. and S. barbata D. Don, the species could be distinguished by cross-validation with other primers. Differentiation methods were established for 5 species of the Scutellaria genus using the above primers. Table 7 provides the sequence and information of each primer. In conclusion, the leaves of each sample shown in Figure 1 could be characterized by specific primer sets and cross-validation. Sample 1 was S. indica L. and Sample 2 was determined to be S. pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara. Sample 3 was judged to be S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi and Sample 4 was judged to be S. barbata D. Don. Finally, Sample 5 was determined to be S. baicalensis Georgi.

4. Discussion

Recently, genetic investigations and the development of markers for subspecies of plants that cannot be classified visually or phenotypically have been active. Even for similar subspecies, the differences in physiological activity and components are clear, so these studies are receiving increasing attention [26,27]. In the field of marker development, a comprehensive investigation of new or combined species-specific variable markers in the chloroplast region of plants has begun. However, genetic information of plants is essential for differentiation and research is almost impossible if there is no reference genome. In this study, we aimed to genetically differentiate S. indica L. and S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi, which are difficult to classify by phenotype. In some cases, most of the specimens identified as S. indica L. were actually S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi [2]. In the NCBI GenBank database, about 17 species in the genus Scutellaria L. have reported the complete chloroplast genomes. However, among the five species of Scutellaria L. selected for this study, only S. baicalensis Georgi has been reported as a complete chloroplast genome. A specific primer developed using the reference genome was tested but classification failed because it did not show specific amplification. For this reason, we performed whole-genome de novo assembly to obtain the genome of the subspecies S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi. Most of the genes did not have hits and 279 genes matched the genus Scutellaria. Primers were prepared by screening these 279 genes and nine annotated chloroplast barcoded DNA loci. Since the primers prepared with each sequence registered in GenBank did not show specific amplification, we aimed to design primers that were specific to each species by using the gene matched with the genus Scutellaria via BLAST. As a result, four specifically amplifying primers were designed and three species could be classified. The SP primer was specific to S. pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara (S. pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara voucher KUS:2006-1082 trnH-PsbA intergenic spacer, partial sequence; and PsbA (psbA) gene, partial CDS). It was prepared using the base sequence of the chloroplast (KX060016.1). Primers (ST1 and ST2 primers) specific to S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi were prepared using the annotated chloroplast barcode DNA AtpI_0 and rbCL_3 nucleotide sequences. The sequences of these two barcode DNAs were registered in the NCBI GenBank database and given accession numbers MZ714561 and MZ714562, respectively. For S. baicalensis Georgi, the complete chloroplast genome sequence (S. baicalensis Georgi isolate BOP028266 chloroplast, complete genome (MF521633.1)) was deposited in GenBank, so it was possible to obtain the specific SB primer. The SL primer was produced using the nucleotide sequence of the S. indica L. TCP transcription factor (CYC2B) gene, partial CDS (KM526800.1), but amplified DNA in two species, S. indica L. and S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi. However, when this primer was used with the ST1 or ST2 primer, S. indica L. could be discerned. The SD1 primer amplifies DNA in the Scutellaria insignis chloroplast, the complete genome (KT750009.1) was produced using the sequence and classification was possible because the primer amplified DNA only in S. barbata D. Don. However, it was concluded that this result alone was insufficient evidence, and a differentiation method was developed using both the SD2 and SD1 primers, which amplified DNA in all five species. The SD2 primer is specific to Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis voucher SWUS (Kim 2008-008 psbK-psbI intergenic spacer, partial sequence). It was prepared using the chloroplast (KX059898.1) base sequence. This study focused on classifying five species of the genus Scutellaria L. native to Korea as a precedent study for our future research. Prior to this study, five species whose usefulness was confirmed in the screening process for new drug development were selected. For in-depth studies, it was necessary to investigate and standardize the active compounds for each of the five species. Except for S. barbata D. Don and S. baicalensis Georgi, the morphologies between the three species were very similar. Due to the similar shape of the three species, it was difficult to conduct research because it was difficult to supply and sample accurate raw materials. Therefore, research on classification and identification by species was urgently needed. Species-specific primer development was attempted by comparing each gene, but the three species lacked reference genomes and did not overlap, so SNP or barcode genes could not be targeted and failed to generate classification markers using the reported reference genome. Species-specific primers were prepared using the annotated cpDNA portion of the WGS results, S. indica L. and S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi could be classified, and a classification method for five species was made with the additionally prepared primers. However, genetic studies on S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi, S. indica L. and S. pekinensis var. transtra (Makino) H. Hara are still lacking, and further studies are needed. In addition, it cannot be regarded as a perfect genetic classification because species-specific primers focusing on the SNP part were not prepared by comparing cpDNA or barcode genes with each of the five overlapping species. Nevertheless, it is very meaningful to be able to classify five species of Scutellaria L. genus and we will make up for the shortcomings through future genetic research.

5. Conclusions

This study reports the sequencing, assembly and annotation of the genome of S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi using de novo assembly, as well as a method for discriminating five species of Scutellaria using species-specific primers. Among the nucleotide sequences obtained as a result of WGS, annotated chloroplast DNA (AtpI_0, rbcL_3) was used to prepare a primer that was specific to S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi, and using this primer, S. indica L. and S. indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi were molecularly classified. In addition, a primer set that can distinguish among S. pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara, S. barbata D. Don and S. baicalensis Georgi was developed. The results will lay a solid foundation for future genetic studies in this species. Furthermore, fractionation by species-specific markers identified in the assembled genome suggested that the markers will be useful for subsequent investigations of phylogenetic structure and genetic diversity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.; data curation, W.S.K. and H.C.; formal analysis, H.C.; funding acquisition, S.K. and C.-S.N.; methodology, H.C.; project administration, S.K.; resources, J.S.K. and S.K.; writing—original draft, S.K.; writing—review and editing, C.-S.N. and S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a Korea Innovation Foundation (INNIPOLIS) grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) through a science and technology project that opens the future of the region (grant number: 2021-DD-UP-0380). The funding body did not play a role in study design, study performance, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation/writing of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon specific request.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank other colleagues in our laboratory for their help and effort in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Lee, Y.; Kim, S. The complete chloroplast genome of Scutellaria indica var. coccinea (Lamiaceae), an endemic taxon in Korea. Mitochondrial DNA. Part B Resour. 2019, 4, 2539–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kim, S.T.; Lee, S.T. Taxonomy of the genus Scutellaria (Lamiaceae) in Korea. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 1995, 25, 71–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, C.-S.; Kim, S.-Y.; Byun, G.-O. A new record for Korean flora: Scutellaria tuberifera CY Wu & C. Chen (Lamiaceae). Korean J. Plant Taxon. 2011, 41, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shang, X.; He, X.; Li, M.; Zhang, R.; Fan, P.; Zhang, Q.; Jia, Z. The genus Scutellaria an ethnopharmacological and phytochemical review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 128, 279–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, Y.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, B.Y.; Kim, J.-S.; Kim, S. A new distribution record of Scutellaria barbata D. Don (Lamiaceae) and an erroneously identified Scutellaria in Korea. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 2018, 48, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kim, S.-T.; Lee, S.-T. Fruit surface morphology of Scutellaria (Lamiaceae) in Korea and its taxonomic implication. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 1995, 25, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, V.K.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, S.; Singh, B.D. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Tools and Impact in Plant Breeding. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Breeding, Biotechnology and Molecular Tools; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 563–612. [Google Scholar]
  8. Punia, A.; Yadav, R.; Arora, P.; Chaudhury, A. Molecular and morphophysiological characterization of superior cluster bean (Cymopsis tetragonoloba) varieties. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2009, 12, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pathak, R.; Singh, S.; Singh, M.; Henry, A. Molecular assessment of genetic diversity in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) genotypes. J. Genet. 2010, 89, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kuravadi, N.A.; Tiwari, P.B.; Tanwar, U.K.; Tripathi, S.K.; Dhugga, K.S.; Gill, K.S.; Randhawa, G.S. Identification and characterization of EST-SSR markers in cluster bean (Cyamopsis spp.). Crop Sci. 2014, 54, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kuravadi, N.A.; Yenagi, V.; Rangiah, K.; Mahesh, H.; Rajamani, A.; Shirke, M.D.; Russiachand, H.; Loganathan, R.M.; Lingu, C.S.; Siddappa, S. Comprehensive analyses of genomes, transcriptomes and metabolites of neem tree. PeerJ 2015, 3, e1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Pathak, R. Clusterbean: Physiology, Genetics and Cultivation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar, S.; Parekh, M.J.; Patel, C.B.; Zala, H.N.; Sharma, R.; Kulkarni, K.S.; Fougat, R.S.; Bhatt, R.K.; Sakure, A.A. Development and validation of EST-derived SSR markers and diversity analysis in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba). J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taheri, S.; Lee Abdullah, T.; Yusop, M.R.; Hanafi, M.M.; Sahebi, M.; Azizi, P.; Shamshiri, R.R. Mining and development of novel SSR markers using next generation sequencing (NGS) data in plants. Molecules 2018, 23, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lee, J.; Kang, S.-J.; Shim, H.; Lee, S.-C.; Kim, N.-H.; Jang, W.; Park, J.Y.; Kang, J.H.; Lee, W.H.; Lee, T.J.; et al. Characterization of chloroplast genomes, nuclear ribosomal DNAs, and polymorphic SSR markers using whole genome sequences of two euonymus hamiltonianus phenotypes. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, J.; Joh, H.J.; Kim, N.-H.; Lee, S.-C.; Jang, W.; Choi, B.S.; Yu, Y.; Yang, T.-J. High-throughput development of polymorphic simple sequence repeat markers using two whole genome sequence data in Peucedanum japonicum. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Grover, A.; Sharma, P. Development and use of molecular markers: Past and present. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lenz, P.H.; Roncalli, V.; Hassett, R.P.; Wu, L.-S.; Cieslak, M.C.; Hartline, D.K.; Christie, A.E. De novo assembly of a transcriptome for Calanus finmarchicus (Crustacea, Copepoda)–the dominant zooplankter of the North Atlantic Ocean. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Singh, V.; Goel, R.; Pande, V.; Asif, M.H.; Mohanty, C.S. De novo sequencing and comparative analysis of leaf transcriptomes of diverse condensed tannin-containing lines of underutilized Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kajitani, R.; Yoshimura, D.; Okuno, M.; Minakuchi, Y.; Kagoshima, H.; Fujiyama, A.; Kubokawa, K.; Kohara, Y.; Toyoda, A.; Itoh, T. Platanus-allee is a de novo haplotype assembler enabling a comprehensive access to divergent heterozygous regions. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. English, A.C.; Richards, S.; Han, Y.; Wang, M.; Vee, V.; Qu, J.; Qin, X.; Muzny, D.M.; Reid, J.G.; Worley, K.C.; et al. Mind the gap: Upgrading genomes with Pacific Biosciences RS long-read sequencing technology. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Simao, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cantarel, B.L.; Korf, I.; Robb, S.M.; Parra, G.; Ross, E.; Moore, B.; Holt, C.; Sanchez Alvarado, A.; Yandell, M. MAKER: An easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 2008, 18, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Szklarczyk, D.; Forslund, K.; Cook, H.; Heller, D.; Walter, M.C.; Rattei, T.; Mende, D.R.; Sunagawa, S.; Kuhn, M.; et al. eggNOG 4.5: A hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D286–D293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kim, Y.; Kim, A.Y.; Jo, A.; Choi, H.; Cho, S.S.; Choi, C. Development of user-friendly method to distinguish subspecies of the Korean medicinal herb perilla frutescens using multiplex-PCR. Molecules 2017, 22, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kim, Y.; Choi, H.; Shin, J.; Jo, A.; Lee, K.E.; Cho, S.S.; Hwang, Y.P.; Choi, C. Molecular Discrimination of Cynanchum wilfordii and Cynanchum auriculatum by InDel Markers of Chloroplast DNA. Molecules 2018, 23, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Leaf profiles of five species of Scutellaria L.
Figure 1. Leaf profiles of five species of Scutellaria L.
Cimb 43 00152 g001
Figure 2. Base quality of DNA at each cycle after filtering. (A) Read 1 at each cycle after filtering. (B) Read 2 at each cycle after filtering. Yellow box: Interquartile range (25–775%) of Phred scores at each cycle. Red line: Median Phred score at each cycle. Blue line: Average Phred score at each cycle. Green background: Good quality. Orange background: Acceptable quality. Red background: Poor quality.
Figure 2. Base quality of DNA at each cycle after filtering. (A) Read 1 at each cycle after filtering. (B) Read 2 at each cycle after filtering. Yellow box: Interquartile range (25–775%) of Phred scores at each cycle. Red line: Median Phred score at each cycle. Blue line: Average Phred score at each cycle. Green background: Good quality. Orange background: Acceptable quality. Red background: Poor quality.
Cimb 43 00152 g002
Figure 3. K-mer graph. The genome size can be estimated using the total k-mer number and volume peak. The top of the peak does not intersect the kmer-peak line because of overdispersion of the real data.
Figure 3. K-mer graph. The genome size can be estimated using the total k-mer number and volume peak. The top of the peak does not intersect the kmer-peak line because of overdispersion of the real data.
Cimb 43 00152 g003
Figure 4. Genus-level summary of BLASTN results. The following figure shows the proportion based on the genus level as the result of the best hit for the entire contig.
Figure 4. Genus-level summary of BLASTN results. The following figure shows the proportion based on the genus level as the result of the best hit for the entire contig.
Cimb 43 00152 g004
Figure 5. EggNOG functional classification of Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis unigenes. In total, 23,716 unigenes were assigned to 25 categories.
Figure 5. EggNOG functional classification of Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis unigenes. In total, 23,716 unigenes were assigned to 25 categories.
Cimb 43 00152 g005
Figure 6. PCR analysis of five Scutellaria species using primers designed to amplify SL (A), SP (B), ST1 (C), ST2 (D), SD1 (E), SD2 (F) and SB (G). Amplicons: M, 100 bp DNA ladder; Sample 1, Scutellaria indica L.; Sample 2, Scutellaria pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara; Sample 3, Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi; Sample 4: Scutellaria barbata D. Don; Sample 5: Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi.
Figure 6. PCR analysis of five Scutellaria species using primers designed to amplify SL (A), SP (B), ST1 (C), ST2 (D), SD1 (E), SD2 (F) and SB (G). Amplicons: M, 100 bp DNA ladder; Sample 1, Scutellaria indica L.; Sample 2, Scutellaria pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara; Sample 3, Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi; Sample 4: Scutellaria barbata D. Don; Sample 5: Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi.
Cimb 43 00152 g006
Table 1. Summary of the Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis data.
Table 1. Summary of the Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis data.
Raw Data StatsFiltered Data Stats
Total read bases147,017,334,834112,735,647,909
Total reads973,24,734749,527,438
GC (%)37.436.69
Q20 (%)95.5198.91
Q30 (%)90.4596.49
Table 2. K-mer analysis results.
Table 2. K-mer analysis results.
K-Mer CoverageHeterozygosityGenome LengthGenome Repeat Length
21mer234.20.404352,670,975166,169,989
Table 3. Assembly summary of contigs and scaffolds.
Table 3. Assembly summary of contigs and scaffolds.
ContigsScaffolds
No.19,56114,625
Sum298,515,080318,741,328
N5042,02078,430
Longest411,840803,009
Shortest10001000
Average length15,26021,794
Table 4. Overall mapping statistics.
Table 4. Overall mapping statistics.
Library NameTotal ReadsMapped ReadsCoverage (%)DepthIns. Size (Std.)
DNA749,527,438655,896,731 (87.51%)94.65276.51475.88 (113.04)
Table 5. BUSCO analysis results.
Table 5. BUSCO analysis results.
StatusOf BUSCOsPercentage
Complete BUSCOs (C)
Complete and single-copy BUSCOs (S)22975.58%
Complete and duplicated BUSCOs (D)5016.50%
Fragmented BUSCOs (F)41.32%
Missing BUSCOs (M)206.60%
Total BUSCO groups searched303100.00%
Table 6. Genome annotation summary.
Table 6. Genome annotation summary.
SampleContigsBasesGenesCDSstRNAsrRNAs
DNA14,625318,741,32823,81422,788670356
Table 7. Primer pairs tested by PCR with genomic DNA from five Scutellaria species.
Table 7. Primer pairs tested by PCR with genomic DNA from five Scutellaria species.
Primer NameSequence (5′->3′)Product SizeTm (℃)NCBI Accession of
Target Genome
LocusTarget Species
SL PrimerForwardTGCTTACCTGCTTCCACAGG945 bp54KM526800.1CYC2BScutellaria indica L.
ReverseTCGGTGGCGACGTTATATGG
SP PrimerForwardGAAATTACTTTTAAATTCAT173 bp42KX060016.1trnH-PsbAScutellaria pekinensis var. transitra (Makino) H. Hara
ReverseGTAGTCTTTCCTAGACTTTA
ST1 PrimerForwardTTGTGGCATCACTAACCCCC491 bp54MZ714561AtpI_0Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi
ReverseAGGGGTAGGCTGAACGTACT
ST2 PrimerForwardCGCATTCCTCCAGCCTATGT444 bp54MZ714562rbcL_3Scutellaria indica var. tsusimensis (H. Hara) Ohwi
ReverseATCACGGCAGTAGTGTGCAA
SD1 PrimerForwardATAACTTCCCTCTAGACTTA939 bp43KT750009.1-Scutellaria barbata D. Don
ReverseTGAATTTCAATTATTTTTTC
SD2 PrimerForwardACCCTTGATTCGCACACTGA77 bp55KX059898.1PsbK-PsbIScutellaria barbata D. Don
ReverseTGAGGAAACGGACGTAAGCC
SB PrimerForwardTCCCCAAAAAGTGGATCCCG218 bp55MF521633.1-Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi
ReverseGGGCCTCATTGGTAAGTGCT
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, H.; Kang, W.S.; Kim, J.S.; Na, C.-S.; Kim, S. De Novo Assembly and Species-Specific Marker Development as a Useful Tool for the Identification of Scutellaria L. Species. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 43, 2177-2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb43030152

AMA Style

Choi H, Kang WS, Kim JS, Na C-S, Kim S. De Novo Assembly and Species-Specific Marker Development as a Useful Tool for the Identification of Scutellaria L. Species. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2021; 43(3):2177-2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb43030152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Hakjoon, Wan Seok Kang, Jin Seok Kim, Chang-Su Na, and Sunoh Kim. 2021. "De Novo Assembly and Species-Specific Marker Development as a Useful Tool for the Identification of Scutellaria L. Species" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 43, no. 3: 2177-2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb43030152

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop