Next Article in Journal
Catecholamines Attenuate LPS-Induced Inflammation through β2 Adrenergic Receptor Activation- and PKA Phosphorylation-Mediated TLR4 Downregulation in Macrophages
Previous Article in Journal
Hepatotoxicity Induced by Methyl Eugenol: Insights from Toxicokinetics, Metabolomics, and Gut Microbiota
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Evaluation of Rz2 Gene Expression in Sugar Beet Hybrids Infected with Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus

by
Ruslan Moisseyev
1,2,
Alexandr Pozharskiy
1,
Aisha Taskuzhina
1,2,
Marina Khusnitdinova
1,
Ualikhan Svanbayev
1,
Zagipa Sapakhova
3 and
Dilyara Gritsenko
1,2,*
1
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
3
Laboratory of Breeding and Biotechnology, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(10), 11326-11335; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100674
Submission received: 17 September 2024 / Revised: 7 October 2024 / Accepted: 9 October 2024 / Published: 12 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Sugar beet hybrids are essential in modern agriculture due to their superior yields, disease resistance, and adaptability. This study investigates the role of the Rz2 gene in conferring resistance to beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) in 14 sugar beet hybrids cultivated in Kazakhstan, including local and European varieties. The Rz2 gene, encoding a CC-NB-LRR protein, is a known resistance factor against BNYVV. Using RT-qPCR, we assessed Rz2 expression and detected BNYVV in bait plants inoculated with virus-infested soil. Our findings identified two highly resistant varieties: the Kazakh cultivar ‘Abulhair’ and the French line 22b5006. Additionally, the Kazakh cultivar ‘Pamyati Abugalieva’ and the French hybrid ‘Bunker’ exhibited increased resistance, suggesting involvement of other resistance loci. Notably, the Danish hybrid ‘Alando’, despite resistance to rhizomania, did not effectively resist BNYVV, highlighting possible evasion of its genetic factors by local virus strains. Our results emphasize the importance of Rz2 in resistance breeding programs and advocate for further research on additional resistance genes and the genetic variability of BNYVV in Kazakhstan. This work pioneers the molecular evaluation of BNYVV resistance in sugar beet in Kazakhstan, contributing to sustainable disease management and improved sugar beet production.

1. Introduction

Rhizomania caused by beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) is one of the most severe diseases affecting sugar beet listed among the quarantine diseases of economic significance [1] and is responsible for sugar beet yield losses of up to 80% [2]. Infected roots exhibit stunted growth, abnormal development of lateral roots around the main root, necrotic rings in the root zone, and yellowing of the leaves [3]. The virus spreads extensively through the soil-borne vector Polymyxa betae [4], which produces zoospores in the soil, enabling the virus to survive in the form of resting spores for decades [5]. There are three main pathotypes of the beet necrotic yellow vein virus: A, B, and P [6,7,8]. Pathotype A has been identified in Greece, parts of Europe, the USA, and Asia [8], pathotype B is found in Germany and the Upper Rhine Valley, while pathotype P is limited to specific regions in France, the United Kingdom, and Kazakhstan [6]. Pathotypes A and B contain four genomic RNAs, while pathotype P carries a fifth RNA, which is associated with increased virulence [6,9].
Conventional pest control methods are largely ineffective; thus, the development of resistant sugar beet varieties is of primary importance for crop protection [10]. As of now, four resistance genes, Rz1, Rz2, Rz3, and Rz4, have been identified, originating from wild relatives of sugar beet. Genes Rz1 and Rz2 are considered the main factors of resistance against BNYVV [11]. Whereas the mechanism of resistance induced by Rz1 are not known, Rz2 has been identified as a key component of the plant’s immune defense system, encoding a protein from the CC-NB-LRR class, which plays a role in the active recognition of pathogens [12]. Genes of this type are crucial in providing dominant resistance in plants by initiating a hypersensitive response (HR), leading to localized cell death at the site of infection. R-class proteins are structurally organized into NB and LRR domains, which are responsible for recognizing viral proteins and transmitting signals [13], ultimately triggering cell death, making them essential components of the plant immune response [14]. Experimental studies confirmed that the presence of the Rz2 gene confers a higher level of resistance [3] by inducing a hypersensitivity response against BNYVV and the beet soilborne mosaic virus belonging to the same genus Benyvirus [15]. In 2002–2003, resistance-breaking isolates of BNYVV were detected in the Imperial Valley of California, overcoming the resistance conferred by the Rz1 gene in sugar beet varieties, whereas Rz2 retained its effect in prevention of the infection [12].
The present study focuses on the evaluation of resistance against BNYVV conferred by the Rz2 gene in a selection of local and foreign sugar beet varieties grown in Kazakhstan. The obtained results are novel for Kazakhstan and will help to introduce and implement methods based on molecular biology for the selection of sugar beets resistant to rhizomania and other viral diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Soil Samples, and P. betae Detection

Fourteen sugar beet hybrids from European and Kazakhstani breeding programs were evaluated for resistance to a local isolate of the A strain of BNYVV (Table 1). Six hybrids originated from France, five from Kazakhstan, two from Germany, and one from Denmark. All hybrids had been confirmed to be regionally adapted in the fields of the south and south-east of Kazakhstan.
Soil samples containing Polymyxa betae were collected from sugar beet fields in 2023 and used for plant inoculation with BNYVV. These samples were taken from the collateral root systems of virus-infected plants. The presence of Polymyxa betae in the soil was confirmed by PCR using primers PB-F 5′-ATCATGTCGGCAACCGAAAGT-3′ and PB-R 5′-TCTGAGATCTTGTATGGTTCGG-3′, and probe (BHQ)- 5′-TCGGATTCTTGGAACGATAATCCGCCA-3′- (FAM). The primers and probe were developed and provided by LetGen Biotech company (Izmir, Turkey). The reaction mix was prepared using Luna Universal Probe qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) for a volume of 20 μL and contained 0.5 μM each of forward and reverse primers, 0.25 μM probe, and 2 μL of prepared DNA extracts from soil. PCR was carried out using a Bio-Rad CFX 96 system with the following program: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min; 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, followed by combined annealing and elongation at 58 °C, with measurements of the signal for 30 s according to manufacturer protocol. The Limit of Detection (LOD) for P. betae was 101 copies/µL: Cq = 37.2 ± 0.5. LOD was calculated by standard deviation analysis according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The threshold was set at 95 RFU.

2.2. Plant Inoculation and BNYVV Detection

Polymyxa betae-positive soil samples were mixed with clean soil in the ratio 1:1. Three to five sugar beet seeds of every hybrid were planted in this soil in three replicates and cultivated in the climatic chamber KBWF 240 (Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany). The temperature and relative humidity were kept at values 24 °C and 65%, respectively. The photoperiod was set to a 14 h light and 10 h dark cycle. The control plants were cultivated in clean soil. The lateral rootlets of the plants were periodically examined for the presence of P. betae cystosori by a microscope using 0.05% aniline blue dye in lactoglycerol as a staining and mounting medium.
The total RNA from plants was extracted by an RNA Plant/Fungi Total RNA Purification Kit (Norgen Biotek, Thorold, ON, Canada). For the detection of BNYVV, a Real-Time PCR Detection Kit provided by LetGen Biotech, Turkey (Cat# LSK471-0500), was used. This kit was designed for the direct detection of viral RNA by reverse transcription and qPCR within a single tube and includes two reaction mixes: the first for the detection of pathotype B with an FAM-labeled probe, and the second for the detection of pathotypes A and P with probes labeled with FAM and Cy5, respectively. The reaction mix was prepared following the manufacturer’s recommendation. For each sample, 500 ng of total RNA was used. PCR was run in a Bio-Rad CFX 96 real-time amplification system. A sample was considered positive for BNYVV types A, B, or P if the threshold cycle value was present and did not exceed 30. LOD was 12 copies/µL with a corresponding Ct value of 35.0. LOD was calculated by standard deviation analysis according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The threshold was set at 100 RFU for FAM and 75 for Cy5.

2.3. RT-qPCR Analysis of Rz2 Expression

Total RNA was isolated from the lateral root system of each hybrid using the Plant/Fungi Total RNA Purification Kit (Norgen Biotek, Thorold, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A total of 1-2 µg of total RNA was used for reverse transcription (RT). RT of obtained RNA extracts was performed for an hour at 45 °C using Superscript IV reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A combination of oligo-dT and random hexameric primers was used.
The expression of the gene Rz2 was analyzed using primers qP-Rz2s (5′- CAGCAGCAATACACAAGTCCA-3′) and qP-Rz2as (5′- TGATGAATGTAATGGAGCATAGAAATT-3′) [15]. The sugar beet GAPDH gene was used as a reference gene [15]. The reaction mixes for Rz2 and reference gene were prepared using Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) for a volume of 20 μL and contained 0.4 μM each of forward and reverse primers. PCR was carried out using the Bio-Rad CFX 96 system. The reaction conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for 20 s, and extension at 72 °C for 40 s. A final extension step was performed at 72 °C for 5 min. Each biological replicate consisted of three different plants, and three biological replicates were used. Each biological sample was analyzed in two technical repeats. Normalization of data and calculation of relative expression values were performed using the 2−ΔΔCt method [16]; the average Ct by biological replicates was used for calculations. The plotting of results was performed using Prism 10.3.1 software for Windows (GraphPad, Boston, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of P. betae Infestation and BNYVV Amplification in Lateral Root Systems of Sugar Beet Hybrids

To inoculate the sugar beet plants with BNYVV, fourteen hybrids were planted in P. betae-contaminated soil samples collected from virus-positive plants in 2023. The isolate Kz1-3 (PP947733.1 and PP947719.1) was used in the present work, which belonged to the A strain according to the qPCR results. The presence of P. betae in the soil samples prior to seed planting was confirmed by qPCR. The cultivated plants were screened for the presence of P. betae before BNYVV testing. The first signs of P. betae infestation in the lateral root systems of the sugar beet plants were observed during the fourth week of cultivation in the contaminated soil. In contrast, the control plants showed no signs of P. betae presence. By the fifth and sixth weeks, all experimental plants were infested by P. betae (Figure 1). Further, all plants were analyzed by RT-qPCR for virus detection. Despite the presence of BNYVV in the tested plants, symptoms of infection in the above-ground plant parts, such as yellowing, wilting, and leaf chlorosis, were not detected (Figure 2). The evaluation of disease symptoms in the lateral root system could not be conducted due to the plants’ immature stage of development. At this early growth phase, the lateral roots had not sufficiently developed, making it difficult to accurately observe or assess any potential symptoms of disease.
According to the qPCR analysis of BNYVV accumulation in plants, the highest viral amplification was observed in all hybrids at week 6, except for ‘Abulhair’, ‘Pamyati’ Abugalieva, and 22b5006, in which the virus was not detected. For the other hybrids, the Ct values for viral amplification ranged from 20 to 24, indicating a substantial level of viral replication (Figure 3).
However, for the ‘FD Bunker’ hybrid, the Ct value was notably higher, recorded at 34.5, suggesting a suppression of viral amplification, possibly due to an effective plant defense response. Testing for virus presence at week 8 showed no significant difference in viral amplification compared to week 6, indicating that the viral load stabilized over time in the infected hybrids; Table 2. Therefore, plants from weeks 6 and 8 were used for the analysis of Rz2 expression.

3.2. Evaluation of Rz2 Expression in Sugar Beet Hybrids

The expression level of the Rz2 gene was analyzed in all sugar beet hybrids included in the current study. The Rz2 gene is a key determinant of resistance to BNYVV, and its presence and expression levels can provide insights into the plant’s ability to suppress viral replication. According to the RT-qPCR analysis, the Rz2 gene was not detected in the ‘Viorika’, ‘Eider’, ‘Alando’, ‘Bolashak’, ‘Concertina’, and ‘Puls’ hybrids. The expression of the Rz2 gene in the remaining hybrids varied significantly, indicating a differential response to BNYVV infection among the studied sugar beet varieties. The first step was to compare differences in relative expression between weeks 6 and 8. We did not identify statistically supported differences in expression levels (Table 3). The mean values of weeks 6 and 8 were represented further.
The relative expression levels of the Rz2 gene were highest in the hybrids ‘Abulhair’, ‘22b5006′, and ‘Pamyati Abugalieva’, with mean values of 12.41×, 9.66×, and 2.16×, respectively; Figure 4. These elevated expression levels suggest a strong activation of the plant’s defense mechanisms in these hybrids, potentially contributing to their observed resistance to viral accumulation.
In contrast, the relative expression of Rz2 in the ‘FD Bunker’, ‘Aksu’, ‘Taraz’, and ‘22b5004′ hybrids was much lower, not exceeding 1.52×. This lower expression may indicate a weaker resistance response, which could be linked to their susceptibility to BNYVV, as observed in the viral amplification analysis. The variability in Rz2 expression levels across the hybrids highlights the complex nature of resistance mechanisms and suggests that other factors, in addition to Rz2, might be influencing the plants’ ability to combat BNYVV infection.

4. Discussion

In contemporary agricultural practices, sugar beet hybrids are widely used due to their higher yields, disease resistance, adaptability to diverse climates, and superior root quality [17]. This study aimed to investigate the role of the Rz2 gene in providing resistance to BNYVV in 14 sugar beet hybrids cultivated in Kazakhstan, including 5 local, 6 French, 2 German, and 1 Danish hybrid. Kazakh hybrids ‘Pamyati Abugalieva’, ‘Aksu’, ‘Abulhair’, ‘Bolashak’, and ‘Taraz’, developed by the Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, are known for their high productivity and disease resistance. The Danish hybrid ‘Alando’ is a high-yielding, mid-season, single-germ diploid with genetic resistance to rhizomania and tolerance to cercospora and aphanomyces, according to the seed provider. The German hybrids ‘Viorika’ and ‘Concertino’ provide substantial sugar production, with ‘Concertino’ excelling in early- and mid-harvest scenarios, while ‘Viorika’ performs well under irrigation and is suitable for mid- to late harvests, with resistance to fusarium, scab, aphanomyces, and cercospora. The French hybrids ‘Bunker’, ‘Eider’, ‘22b5006’, ‘22b5004’, and ‘Puls’, created by PAT “Florimond Desprez Veuve et Fils,” are distinguished by their high sugar content and strong disease resistance. However, for most hybrids the data on their agronomic properties are limited by the commercial information and require experimental validation.
The use of beet hybrids harboring resistance genes against BNYVV is a crucial part of the disease management as the spread of the virus is difficult to control. BNYVV may persist in the dormant spores of P. betae for over 15 years [18]; thus, the infested soil may be a source of infection long after the elimination of the affected plants or even crop changes. The use of resistant varieties could increase the efficiency of beet production. The Rz2 gene encoding the CC-NB-LRR protein is a well-characterized resistance factor against BNYVV in sugar beet [13,19] and considered efficient for disease prevention [20]. Here, we have tested the expression of Rz2 and the presence of BNYVV in the bait plants after inoculation with soil samples infested by P. betae carrying the virus. The tested hybrids represented the sugar beet varieties grown in Kazakhstan, including five hybrids of local selection. The previous studies show that the expression of Rz2 prevents amplification of the virus by inducing a hypersensitive response-like reaction [15]. As shown in Figure 4, three cultivars demonstrated higher levels of Rz2 expression. The same three hybrids showed negative results when tested for the presence of BNYVV; Figure 3. Notably, such an outcome was observed regardless of the relative expression levels between these three hybrids. Thus, the expression level observed in the hybrid ‘Pamyati Abugalieva’ was sufficient to prevent virus amplification in plants; however, it could also harbor other resistance loci such as Rz1, providing a cumulative resistance effect. Another cultivar, ‘FD Bunker’ (France), had slightly increased expression and showed an increased Ct value, indicating partial suppression of the virus. These hybrids demonstrating suppressed virus with only moderate Rz2 expression require further extensive studies involving other resistance loci. The obtained results have shown that the expression of the Rz2 gene measured by RT-qPCR is an informative indicator of resistance in response to the inoculation by BNYVV in sugar beet. As we have seen, the correlation between Rz2 expression and virus amplification helps to evaluate resistance even when the visual symptoms are absent or week and thus inconclusive.
Based on the obtained results, the hybrid ‘Abulhair’ (Kazakhstan), as well as the line 22b5006 (France), should be considered the promising genetic source for the selection of sugar beets resistant to BNYVV. The hybrid ‘Pamyati Abugalieva’ has also demonstrated efficient prevention of the reproduction of the virus despite lower Rz2 expression and thus should be tested further. Although allegedly resistant to rhizomania, the ‘Alando’ hybrid did not show efficacy against BNYVV. The reason for this may be that this variety carries genetic factors other than Rz2, which could be evaded by the local BNYVV strains.
The present work was the first to evaluate resistance to BNYVV in sugar beet using molecular methods in Kazakhstan. The identified Rz2 gene should be used as the primary BNYVV resistance factor in domestic breeding programs as it is, unlike the Rz1 gene, less prone to resistance breaking by genetically diverse BNYVV strains [12,21]. Previously, we found that the strains persisting on local sugar beet fields may be difficult to detect by traditional methods due to a lack of visual symptoms despite causing yield losses [22]. Also, as the previous studies show, the Kazakhstani BNYVV shares peculiar similarity with the P-type isolates from Europe despite the long distance and the limited connections [6]; we have also observed sequence variations in the p25 protein which were not typical for the foreign isolates [22]. Therefore, studies on BNYVV resistance in sugar beet in our country require a comprehensive approach combining expression analysis of resistance genes with wide-scale investigation of the genetic variability in the virus. Thus, the development of new targeted breeding programs is crucial to protect sugar beet production, as well as the development and implementation of sensitive molecular biology-based detection technologies.
Our study focused specifically on the Rz2 gene in relation to sugar beet resistance, without exploring additional genetic factors that might contribute to enhanced resistance. Further studies ought to focus on additional resistance genes or quantitative trait loci, explore a broader range of varieties, establish several resistance breeding programs, and analyze the long-term resistance stability. Furthermore, gene editing could be investigated to enhance the Rz2 gene or add novel resistance characteristics into sugar beet. These future directions will enhance the sustainable control of BNYVV and other diseases in sugar beet cultivation, therefore facilitating increased yields, enhanced quality, and the adoption of more sustainable farming methods.

5. Conclusions

This study presents the results of tests of the expression of the Rz2 resistance gene during BNYVV infection in sugar beet varieties grown in Kazakhstan. An RT-qPCR assay in combination with real-time PCR-based BNYVV detection allowed the identification of two highly resistant hybrids: ‘Abulhair’ (Kazakhstan) and the ‘22b5006′ line (France). Additionally, the hybrids ‘Pamyati Abugalieva’ (Kazakhstan) and ‘Bunker’ (France) demonstrated increased resistance in combination with moderate Rz2 expression, indicating a probable involvement of other resistance loci. Further studies on sugar beet resistance against BNYVV in Kazakhstan require an in-depth investigation of beet resistance with respect to BNYVV’s genetic variability.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb46100674/s1: Table S1: Ct values for Rz2 gene expression evaluated by RT-qPCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.G.; methodology, D.G.; formal analysis, Z.S.; investigation, R.M., A.T., M.K. and U.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.G. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, D.G. and A.P.; supervision, D.G.; project administration, D.G.; funding acquisition, D.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Kazakhstan, grant number AP13067825: ‘Study of genetic resistance of sugar beet to rhizomania and selection of promising varieties for targeted breeding’.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in this study are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. EPPO Datasheet: Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus. Available online: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/BNYVV0/datasheet (accessed on 12 July 2024).
  2. Mcgrann, G.R.D.; Grimmer, M.K.; Mutasa-Göttgens, E.S.; Stevens, M. Progress towards the Understanding and Control of Sugar Beet Rhizomania Disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009, 10, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Biaggi, M.; Stevanato, P.; Trebbi, D.; Saccomani, M.; Biancardi, E. Sugar Beet Resistance to Rhizomania: State of the Art and Perspectives. Sugar Tech. 2010, 12, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tamada, T.; Baba, T. Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus from Rizomania-Affected Sugar Beet in Japan. Jpn. J. Phytopathol. 1973, 39, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Decroës, A.; Mahillon, M.; Genard, M.; Lienard, C.; Lima-Mendez, G.; Gilmer, D.; Bragard, C.; Legrève, A. Rhizomania: Hide and Seek of Polymyxa Betae and the Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus with Beta Vulgaris. MPMI 2022, 35, 989–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Koenig, R.; Lennefors, B.-L. Molecular Analyses of European A, B and P Type Sources of Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus and Detection of the Rare P Type in Kazakhstan. Arch. Virol. 2000, 145, 1561–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koenig, R.; Lüddecke, P.; Haeberlé, A.M. Detection of Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus Strains, Variants and Mixed Infections by Examining Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphisms of Immunocapture RT-PCR Products. J. General. Virol. 1995, 76, 2051–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kruse, M.; Koenig, R.; Hoffmann, A.; Kaufmann, A.; Commandeur, U.; Solovyev, A.G.; Savenkov, I.; Burgermeister, W. Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of Reverse Transcription-PCR Products Reveals the Existence of Two Major Strain Groups of Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus. J. General. Virol. 1994, 75, 1835–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Koenig, R.; Haeberlé, A.-M.; Commandeur, U. Detection and Characterization of a Distinct Type of Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus RNA 5 in a Sugarbeet Growing Area in Europe. Arch. Virol. 1997, 142, 1499–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peltier, C.; Hleibieh, K.; Thiel, H.; Klein, E.; Bragard, C.; Gilmer, D. Molecular Biology of the Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus. Plant Viruses 2008, 2, 14–24. [Google Scholar]
  11. Amiri, R.; Mesbah, M.; Moghaddam, M.; Bihamta, M.R.; Mohammadi, S.A.; Norouzi, P. A New RAPD Marker for Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus Resistance Gene in Beta vulgaris. Biol. Plant. 2009, 53, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, H.-Y.; Lewellen, R.T. Distribution and Molecular Characterization of Resistance-Breaking Isolates of Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus in the United States. Plant Dis. 2007, 91, 848–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Capistrano-Gossmann, G.G.; Ries, D.; Holtgräwe, D.; Minoche, A.; Kraft, T.; Frerichmann, S.L.M.; Rosleff Soerensen, T.; Dohm, J.C.; González, I.; Schilhabel, M.; et al. Crop Wild Relative Populations of Beta Vulgaris Allow Direct Mapping of Agronomically Important Genes. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. de Ronde, D.; Butterbach, P.; Kormelink, R. Dominant Resistance against Plant Viruses. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wetzel, V.; Willlems, G.; Darracq, A.; Galein, Y.; Liebe, S.; Varrelmann, M. The Beta Vulgaris-Derived Resistance Gene Rz2 Confers Broad-Spectrum Resistance against Soilborne Sugar Beet-Infecting Viruses from Different Families by Recognizing Triple Gene Block Protein 1. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 22, 829–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Richardson, K. Traditional Breeding in Sugar Beet. Sugar Tech. 2010, 12, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Scholten, O.E.; Lange, W. Breeding for Resistance to Rhizomania in Sugar Beet: A Review. Euphytica 2000, 112, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Funk, A.; Galewski, P.; McGrath, J.M. Nucleotide-Binding Resistance Gene Signatures in Sugar Beet, Insights from a New Reference Genome. Plant J. 2018, 95, 659–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nalbandyan, A.A.; Fedulova, T.P.; Hussein, A.S. Molecular Selection of Beta Vulgaris, L. Breeding Material with Biotic Stress-Resistance Genes. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2019, 45, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liebe, S.; Wibberg, D.; Maiss, E.; Varrelmann, M. Application of a Reverse Genetic System for Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus to Study Rz1 Resistance Response in Sugar Beet. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pozharskiy, A.; Mendybayeva, A.; Moisseyev, A.; Khusnitdinova, M.; Nizamdinova, G.; Gritsenko, D. Molecular Detection and Sequencing of Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus and Beet Cryptic Virus 2 in Sugar Beet from Kazakhstan. Front. Microbiol. 2024; submitted. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Sugar beet hybrids after 6 weeks of planting in the soil. Microscopy images of stained lateral roots were obtained at 20× magnification (left); scale 50 μm. Infestation by P. betae was analyzed in control plants (A) grown in sterile soil and in plants grown in P. betae-contaminated soil (B).
Figure 1. Sugar beet hybrids after 6 weeks of planting in the soil. Microscopy images of stained lateral roots were obtained at 20× magnification (left); scale 50 μm. Infestation by P. betae was analyzed in control plants (A) grown in sterile soil and in plants grown in P. betae-contaminated soil (B).
Cimb 46 00674 g001
Figure 2. Sugar beet hybrids after 8 weeks of growth in soil. Control healthy plants (left) and BNYVV-infected plants (right). Abulhair (A), Viorika (B), and Taraz (C) hybrids.
Figure 2. Sugar beet hybrids after 8 weeks of growth in soil. Control healthy plants (left) and BNYVV-infected plants (right). Abulhair (A), Viorika (B), and Taraz (C) hybrids.
Cimb 46 00674 g002
Figure 3. Amplification of BNYVV in 6- and 8-week-old sugar beet hybrids. Ct—cycle threshold. Error bars indicate standard deviation. The paired t-test yielded a p-value of less than 0.05.
Figure 3. Amplification of BNYVV in 6- and 8-week-old sugar beet hybrids. Ct—cycle threshold. Error bars indicate standard deviation. The paired t-test yielded a p-value of less than 0.05.
Cimb 46 00674 g003
Figure 4. Relative expression of the Rz2 gene in 6- and 8-week-old sugar beet hybrids was analyzed. The 2−ΔΔCt method was employed to calculate differences in expression between infected and healthy plants, using sugar beet GAPDH as the reference gene. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 4. Relative expression of the Rz2 gene in 6- and 8-week-old sugar beet hybrids was analyzed. The 2−ΔΔCt method was employed to calculate differences in expression between infected and healthy plants, using sugar beet GAPDH as the reference gene. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Cimb 46 00674 g004
Table 1. The hybrids of sugar beet of European and Kazakhstani origin.
Table 1. The hybrids of sugar beet of European and Kazakhstani origin.
#HybridOrigin
122b5006France
2FD BunkerFrance
3EiderFrance
422b5004France
5PulsFrance
6Pamyati AbugalievaKazakhstan
7AksuKazakhstan
8AbulhairKazakhstan
9BolashakKazakhstan
10TarazKazakhstan
11ConcertinaGermany
12ViorikaGermany
13AlandoDenmark
Table 2. RT-PCR analysis of BNYVV amplification in 6- and 8-week-old sugar beet plants. Negative controls were excluded from the table as they were not representative. Paired t-test, p = 0.907, with p-value threshold of 0.05.
Table 2. RT-PCR analysis of BNYVV amplification in 6- and 8-week-old sugar beet plants. Negative controls were excluded from the table as they were not representative. Paired t-test, p = 0.907, with p-value threshold of 0.05.
Week 6Week 8
Sample IDHybridP. betae in SoilCt ValueSDCt ValueSDPresence/Absence of Virus
S1Abulhairpresent----Not detected
S2Viorikapresent22.171.2021.130.88Detected
S3Bunkerpresent34.531.3035.721.58Detected
S4Tarazpresent23.531.5022.171.95Detected
S5Eiderpresent23.031.6823.571.30Detected
S622b5006present----Not detected
S7Alandopresent22.071.0023.541.40Detected
S8Aksupresent22.301.2223.331.47Detected
S9Bolashakpresent20.530.7119.500.84Detected
S1022b5004present22.931.4621.771.46Detected
S11Concertinapresent22.330.8021.141.32Detected
S12Pamyati Abugalievapresent----Not detected
S13Pulspresent22.701.6423.801.51Detected
Table 3. RT-qPCR analysis of relative expression of Rz2 gene in in 6- and 8-week-old sugar beet plants infected by BNYVV. The Rz2-negative hybrids were excluded from the table. Paired t-test, p = 0.9, with p-value of threshold 0.05. Also see Table S1 for Ct values for each biological replicate.
Table 3. RT-qPCR analysis of relative expression of Rz2 gene in in 6- and 8-week-old sugar beet plants infected by BNYVV. The Rz2-negative hybrids were excluded from the table. Paired t-test, p = 0.9, with p-value of threshold 0.05. Also see Table S1 for Ct values for each biological replicate.
Week 6Week 8
Sample IDHybridΔΔCt 2−ΔΔCtΔΔCt 2−ΔΔCtPresence/Absence of Virus
S1Abulhair−3.6312.41−3.4911.24Not detected
S3Bunker−0.601.52−0.611.53Detected
S4Taraz0.790.580.910.53Detected
S622b5006−3.279.66−3.018.06Not detected
S8Aksu0.470.720.640.64Detected
S1022b50041.790.291.580.33Detected
S12Pamyati Abugalieva−1.112.16−1.542.91Not detected
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moisseyev, R.; Pozharskiy, A.; Taskuzhina, A.; Khusnitdinova, M.; Svanbayev, U.; Sapakhova, Z.; Gritsenko, D. Evaluation of Rz2 Gene Expression in Sugar Beet Hybrids Infected with Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 11326-11335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100674

AMA Style

Moisseyev R, Pozharskiy A, Taskuzhina A, Khusnitdinova M, Svanbayev U, Sapakhova Z, Gritsenko D. Evaluation of Rz2 Gene Expression in Sugar Beet Hybrids Infected with Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2024; 46(10):11326-11335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moisseyev, Ruslan, Alexandr Pozharskiy, Aisha Taskuzhina, Marina Khusnitdinova, Ualikhan Svanbayev, Zagipa Sapakhova, and Dilyara Gritsenko. 2024. "Evaluation of Rz2 Gene Expression in Sugar Beet Hybrids Infected with Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46, no. 10: 11326-11335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100674

APA Style

Moisseyev, R., Pozharskiy, A., Taskuzhina, A., Khusnitdinova, M., Svanbayev, U., Sapakhova, Z., & Gritsenko, D. (2024). Evaluation of Rz2 Gene Expression in Sugar Beet Hybrids Infected with Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46(10), 11326-11335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46100674

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop