Next Article in Journal
Exploring Perforated Jejunal GIST: A Rare Case Report and Review of Molecular and Clinical Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
A Smooth Muscle Cell-Based Ferroptosis Model to Evaluate Iron-Chelating Molecules for Cardiovascular Disease Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Mature Recombinant Human Activin A in Transgenic Rice Cell Suspension Culture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Random Allelic Expression in Inherited Retinal Disease Genes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 46
Issue 2
10.3390/cimb46020075
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deep Immunophenotyping of Circulating T and B Cells in Relapsing Adult-Onset Still’s Disease

by
Valentina Myachikova
1,2,†,
Igor Kudryavtsev
2,3,*,†,
Artem Rubinstein
2,3,
Arthur Aquino
2,
Dmitry Isakov
4,
Alexey Golovkin
2 and
Alexey Maslyanskiy
1,5
1
Rheumatology and Immunopathology Research Laboratory, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Almazov National Medical Research Centre” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 197341 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Diseases Research Laboratory, Federal State Budgetary Institution “Almazov National Medical Research Centre” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 197341 St. Petersburg, Russia
3
Laboratory of Cellular Immunology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia
4
Department of Immunology, First St. Petersburg State Medical University, 197022 St. Petersburg, Russia
5
Scientific, Clinical and Educational Centre of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(2), 1177-1191; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46020075
Submission received: 29 December 2023 / Revised: 19 January 2024 / Accepted: 25 January 2024 / Published: 1 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Molecular Mechanisms in Human Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is a complex systemic inflammatory disorder, categorized as an ‘IL-1 driven’ inflammasomapathy. Despite this, the interaction between T and B cells remains poorly understood. We conducted a study, enrolling 7 patients with relapsing AOSD and 15 healthy control subjects, utilizing deep flow cytometry analysis to examine peripheral blood T- and B-cell subsets. T-cell and B-cell subsets were significantly altered in patients with AOSD. Within CD4+ T cells, Th2 cells were decreased. Additionally, Th17 cell and follicular Th cell subsets were altered within CD45RA–CD62L+ and CD45RA–CD62L– Th cells in patients with AOSD compared to healthy controls. We identified changes in CD8+ T cell maturation and ‘polarization’ in AOSD patients, with an elevated presence of the TEMRA CD8+ T cell subset. Furthermore, the percentage of Tc1 cells was decreased, while the frequency of CCR6–CXCR3– Tc2 cells was elevated. Finally, we determined that the frequency of CD5+CD27– B cells was dramatically decreased in patients with AOSD compared to healthy controls. Further investigations on a large group of patients with AOSD are required to evaluate these adaptive immunity cells in the disease pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Still’s disease, initially described by Sir George Frederic Still in children [1], was renamed in 2001 as systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) for standardized terminology. Eric Bywaters identified it in adults 75 years after the first description [2], labeling it adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD). Until 2014, AOSD and sJIA were regarded as distinct nosologies, but this perception changed following gene expression analysis in 2014 [3]. This rare disorder has an annual incidence of 0.16 cases per 100,000 persons, marked by sterile inflammation, prolonged fever, musculoskeletal involvement, skin manifestations, serous membrane involvement, other variable symptoms, and prominent neutrophil-driven leukocytosis [4].
The systemic polycyclic course of AOSD is recognized for its distinct phases of relapse and remission. During a relapse, patients experience severe symptoms, marked by abnormal laboratory test results, showcasing a diverse array of pro-inflammatory cytokines and acute-phase reactants, particularly elevated levels of ferritin. Elevated ferritin concentrations independently predict the emergence of secondary macrophage-activating syndrome (MAS) or secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) [5]. Conversely, in remission, symptoms abate, and laboratory indicators revert to normal levels [6].
The etiology remains unknown, and the pathogenesis, considered a possible mixed (autoinflammatory > autoimmune) systemic inflammatory disease, involves the dysregulation of both the innate and adaptive immune systems [7]. On the one hand, gathered data suggest dysregulation within the innate immune system, reflecting the autoinflammatory nature of the disease, characterized by the activation of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) signaling pathways [8].
Studies have shown increased nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-and leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-containing receptor pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3) expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from AOSD patients that positively correlates with disease activity [9]. On the other hand, a number of patients exhibit a genetic association with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles [7], highlighting the potential influence of adaptive immunity (indicating an autoimmune origin of the disorder). This observation may elucidate why not all patients respond to therapy with IL-1 and IL-6 blockers, as well as the transition from a relapsing to a chronic course.
Limited studies explore adaptive immunity’s role in Still’s disease pathogenesis. Prolonged proinflammatory cytokine synthesis, in contrast to monogenic periodic fevers, may significantly impact not only on visceral organs but also secondary lymphoid tissues where T- and B-lymphocyte differentiation underlying acquired immunity reactions occurs. Specifically, IL-1β and IL-18 contribute to Th0 polarization toward Th1 and Th17 cell fates in lymphoid tissue [10]. IL-1β increases the number of IL-17 and IFN-γ-producing cells, granzyme B-expressing cells, IFN-γ-producing cytolytic CD8+ T cells [11], and, in conjunction with IL-6 and IL-23, it promotes Th17-skewed CD4+ T-cell differentiation [12].
This study aimed to analyze the peripheral blood immune cell profile by using flow cytometry to gain deeper insights into immune system functioning during relapsing AOSD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Characteristics

From April to October 2022, we enrolled 7 patients with a relapse of AOSD in this study. All patients met the diagnostic criteria for AOSD, as proposed by Yamaguchi et al. [13]. Disease activity was assessed using the modified Pouchot’s score (by Rau M.) [14]. We documented the clinical data during the relapse (not all symptoms the patients had previously) (Table 1) and collected whole blood samples from all participants after an overnight fast.
Six patients experienced a severe exacerbation of the disease, while one (Patient 7, Table 1) had a moderate relapse with inadequate pathogenic treatment (4 patients were on a low dose of NSAIDs, and 3 patients were on a low dose of prednisolone (with or without methotrexate), as indicated in Table 1). Additionally, the concentration of C-reactive protein was elevated in all patients. Six patients had a polycyclic course of the disease with a prolonged medical history, whereas one patient had a monocyclic course. All patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Control group consisted of 15 age-matched apparently healthy controls (HCs) (5 men and 10 women) in this study. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Almazov National Medical Research Center (protocol code 28, 12 February 2018). All participants provided written informed consent.

2.2. Sample Collection

Peripheral blood was collected into vacuum K3-EDTA-containing test tubes and was then processed to analyze less than 6 h after collection. The frequencies of the main circulating T- and B-cell subsets were analyzed using flow cytometry. CytoFlex S Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used for immunophenotyping.

2.3. CD3+ T-Cell Phenotyping via Flow Cytometry

T-cell surface markers in peripheral blood samples were detected by flow cytometric analysis. For CD4+ T-cell subsets, peripheral blood samples (200 μL) were incubated with anti-human CD45RA-FITC, CD62L-PE, CXCR5-PerCP/Cy5.5, CCR6-PE/Cy7, CXCR3-APC, CD3-APC/Cy7, CD4-PacBlue, and CCR4-BV510. The detailed characteristics of antibodies are given in Supplementary Table S1. Gaiting strategy was described previously in detail [14]. For CD8+ T-cell subsets, CD4-PacBlue was replaced with CD8-PacBlue. The detailed characteristics of antibodies are given in Supplementary Table S2. All antibodies were manufactured by BioLegend, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA) and were used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Gaiting strategies were described previously in detail [15] and are shown in Supplementary Figures S1 and S2.
Blood samples were incubated with antibodies for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. For red blood, cells were lysed for 15 min in the dark with 2 mL of the VersaLyse Lysing Solution (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA) supplied with 50 μL of the IOTest 3 Fixative Solution (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA). Next, all samples were washed for 7 min at 330 g with 4 mL of a sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplied with 2% of heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Finally, leukocytes were resuspended in 0.5 mL PBS containing a 2% neutral-buffered formalin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and analyzed via flow cytometry. At least 40,000 CD4+ T cells or 20,000 CD8+ T cells were analyzed in each sample.

2.4. CD19+ B-Cell Phenotyping via Flow Cytometry

B-cell subset frequencies and phenotypes in the peripheral blood samples from patients with AOSD and healthy controls were analyzed through flow cytometry. In brief, 100 μL of whole peripheral blood was stained with the following cocktail of mouse anti-human antibodies: IgD-Alexa Fluor 488, CD38-PE, CD27-PE/Cy7, CD24-APC, CD19-APC/Cy7, CD5-PacBlue, and CD45-KrO. The detailed characteristics of antibodies are given in Supplementary Table S3. Red blood cell lysing procedure was followed by cell washing, as described above. At least 5000 CD19+ B cells were analyzed for each sample. The gating strategy was described previously [16] and is shown in Supplementary Figure S3.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The flow cytometry data analysis was performed using Kaluza software v2.1 (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Statistical calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and Statistica 7.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) software. Normality was checked using Pearson’s chi-squared test. All data are presented as a percentage of cells in the main T- or B-cell subsets. Quantitative data are expressed as median and interquartile range: Me (25; 75) in all tables and figures. Nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare different groups. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Alterations in Main Circulating Lymphocyte Subsets in Patients with AOSD

We performed flow cytometry to determine the percentages of CD3+, CD19+, CD8+, and CD4+ T cells in the blood samples of 7 patients with AOSD and 15 patients from the control group. We noticed that patients with AOSD had increased frequencies of T cells (81.08% (76.96; 87.78) vs. 72.53% (68.57; 73.88) with p = 0.007), while CD19+ B cells were decreased (5.32% (4.06; 9.97) vs. 12.54% (8.16; 16.13) with p = 0.018, respectively). Furthermore, in peripheral blood samples from the AOSD group, the levels of CD8+ T cells were elevated if compared to healthy controls (30.77% (26.44; 39.60) vs. 23.42% (19.55; 28.52), p = 0.010), but these two groups had similar percentages of CD4+ T cells (47.09% (30.05; 57.17) vs. 47.04% (40.65; 47.94), respectively, with p = 0.805) and similar CD4/CD8 ratio (1.53 (0.87; 2.17) vs. 1.77 (1.52; 2.44), respectively, with p = 0.192).

3.2. Alterations in Th Cell Maturation and ‘Polarization’ in Patients with AOSD

Primarily, we identified main maturation Th subsets classified by CD45RA and CD62L co-expression (Figure 1A–D), and no significant differences were found in the ‘naïve’ (CD45RA+CD62L+), central memory (CD45RA–CD62L+), effector memory (CD45RA–CD62L–), or TEMRA (CD45RA+CD62L–) Th cell frequencies between patients with the AOSD and control groups. Next, to assess relevant circulating ‘polarized’ CD4+ T cell subsets, we studied the cell surface co-expression of CXCR5, CXCR3, CCR4, and CCR6 chemokine receptors on peripheral blood Th cells, as described previously [14]. Th1 cells were identified as CXCR5–CXCR3+CCR4–CCR6–, Th2 cells had CXCR5–CXCR3–CCR4+CCR6– phenotype, Th17 cells were CXCR5–CCR6+, and follicular Th cells expressed CXCR5 on their cell membrane. We noticed (Figure 1E–H) that patients with AOSD had dramatically decreased numbers of CXCR5–CXCR3–CCR4+CCR6– Th2 cells within the total CD4+ T-cell subset if compared to the healthy control group (1.29% (0.81; 3.70) vs. 6.77% (4.62; 10.11) with p < 0.001).
We next assessed the level of ‘polarized’ Th cell subsets within central memory cells that patrol secondary lymphoid organs, and effector memory cells, able to migrate to the peripheral inflamed tissue to augment the immune responses. As shown in Figure 2, within central memory Th cells, patients with AOSD had increased frequencies of Th17 cells, while Th2 cells were decreased when compared to the HC group (59.41% (48.46; 61.26) vs. 44.88% (39.78; 50.32) with p = 0.001 and 1.48% (1.11% (2.86) vs. 11.76% (9.95; 16.69) with p < 0.001, respectively). Oppositely, Th17 levels in patients with AOSD were decreased within effector memory Th cells when compared to healthy controls (43.58% (29.82; 51.62) vs. 64.99% (55.69; 73.49), p = 0.002). We also indicated that these two groups had similar percentages of Th1 and follicular Th cells within CM and EM CD4+ T-cell subsets.
Next, because patients with AOSD had an altered distribution of peripheral blood CM and EM Th17 cells, we investigated changes in distinct Th17 subsets with different patterns on CXCR3 and CCR4 expression. Currently, there are four major Th17 cell subsets, including CCR4+CXCR3– ‘classical’ Th17 cells, CCR4+CXCR3+ double-positive (DP) Th17 cells, CCR4–CXCR3+ ‘non-classical’ or Th17.1 cells, and CCR4–CXCR3– double-negative (DN) Th17 [17,18]. We noticed that patients with AOSD showed dramatically elevated levels of DN Th17 cells within CM CCR6+ Th cells but decreased frequencies of ‘classical’ and DP Th17 cells if compared to the healthy control group (Table 2). Next, we found increased levels of DN Th17 and ‘classical’ Th17 cells within CCR6+ EM CD4+ T cells, while the numbers of non-classical Th17.1 cells were decreased if compared to HC.
Finally, we focused on circulating CXCR5-expressing follicular Th cell subsets and identified four maim Tfh cell subsets, including CXCR3+CCR6– Tfh1, double-negative CXCR3–CCR6–Tfh2, CXCR3–CCR6+ Tfh17, and double-positive CXCR3+CCR6+ DP Tfh cells, based on CXCR3 and CCR6 chemokine receptor co-expression [19]. First, we noticed a decreased frequency of central memory Tfh17 cells in patients with AOSD (24.63% (21.75; 27.81) vs. 33.64% (27.26; 37.29) with p = 0.008, Table 3). Next, within CD45RA–CD62L– effector memory Tfh cells that were able to leave circulating blood, to migrate to the sites of inflammation and to take part in ectopic lymphoid structure formation [20], we found decreased levels of Tfh2 cells (6.94 (1.57; 11.70) vs. 14.23 (9.89; 18.58) with p = 0.010) and increased levels of DP Tfh cells (31.53 (22.40; 37.80) vs. 18.86 (17.00; 23.48) with p = 0.007) in patients with AOSD vs. healthy controls.

3.3. Alterations in CD8+ T-Cell Maturation and ‘Polarization’ in Patients with AOSD

As shown previously, we found increased numbers of circulating CD8+ T cells in patients with AOSD. Primarily, using multicolor flow cytometry, we assessed the frequencies of peripheral blood CD8+ T-cell subsets with different CD45RA and CD62L co-expression. Similar to CD4+ T cells, we were able to subdivide CD8+ T cells into naïve, central memory, effector memory, and TEMRA cells (Figure 3). We found that the relative number of the most mature CD8+ T-cell subset—TEMRA—was elevated in patients with AOSD if compared to healthy controls (40.51% (22.85; 51.81) vs. 24.06% (17.33; 26.26), p = 0.038). Next, we analyzed CXCR3 and CCR4 co-expression on the cell surface of CD8+ T cells. Within total CD8+ T cells, we identified CCR6–CXCR3+ Tc1 cells, CCR6–CXCR3– Tc2 cells, CCR6+CXCR3– Tc17, and double-positive CCR6+CXCR3+ Tc17.1, as proposed earlier [21,22]. While examining ‘polarized’ CD8+ T-cell counts, it was found that in patients with AOSD, the percentage of Tc1 cells was decreased (61.72% (51.88; 66.90) vs. 73.31% (65.09; 77.59) with p = 0.015). Moreover, the frequency of CCR6–CXCR3– Tc2 cells was elevated (25.24% (15.73; 43.32) in the AOSD group vs. 10.92% (8.34; 13.60) in the control group with p < 0.001).
Next, we analyzed the frequency of CCR6–CXCR3+ Tc1 within ‘naïve’, CM, EM, and TEMRA CD8+ T cells in patients with AOSD (Figure 4) and found that the level of Tc1 cells in ‘naïve’ and TEMRA CD8+ T cells was decreased if compared to healthy controls (69.01% (68.79; 78.10) vs. 82.54% (71.41; 87.36) with p = 0.015 for ‘naïve’ CD8+ T cells and 57.87% (43.47; 67.76) vs. 76.89% (69.22; 80.09) with p = 0.003 fro TEMRA CD8+ T cells, respectively). Next, compared with the healthy control, the percentages of CCR6–CXCR3– Tc2 cells in patients with AOSD were increased in ‘naïve’ EM and TEMRA CD8+ T cells (23.18% (15.82; 25.62) vs. 8.37% (6.82; 13.44) with p = 0.003, 20.25% (10.23; 30.89) vs. 8.18% (4.08; 11.82) with p = 0.022, and 39.43% (27.73; 54.96) vs. 19.32% (16.45; 26.65) with p = 0.003, respectively). Nevertheless, we found no significant differences in frequencies of CCR6-expressing CD8+ T-cell subsets between patients with AOSD and healthy controls.

3.4. Alterations in CD19+ B-Cell Maturation in Patients with AOSD

Finally, considering the potential role of specific humoral immunity alterations during adult-onset Still’s disease, we focused on circulating B cells and their main subsets. Primarily, for B-cell subset immunophenotyping, we used the so-called “Bm1-Bm5” classification, which is based on the relative expression of IgD and CD38 [23]. We revealed six main B-cell maturation stages, including “naïve” IgD+CD38– or Bm1 cells, “activated naïve” IgD+CD38+ or Bm2 cells, ‘pre-germinal-center’ IgD+CD38++ or Bm2 cells, so-called IgD-CD38++ “Bm3 + Bm4” cell subset, that contained containing centroblasts and centrocytes, and peripheral blood circulating memory subsets, early memory IgD–CD38+ or eBm5 cells, and resting memory IgD–CD38– cells or Bm5 cells. As shown in Table 4, we found that patients with AOSD had decreased levels of Bm2 cells and increased frequencies of resting memory Bm5 cells.
Finally, we determined CD5 vs. CD27 co-expression and distinguished CD5+CD27– cells with regulatory properties within the total B-cell population. We found that the frequency of CD5+CD27– B cells was dramatically decreased in patients with AOSD vs. healthy controls (2.53% (0.24; 9.98) vs. 16.80% (10.92; 19.21) with p = 0.002, Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Here, we present the study data, attempting to analyze the circulating adaptive immune lymphocyte profile in AOSD patients by assessing the phenotypic characteristics of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as CD19+ B cells, by focusing on the relevant maturation and ‘polarization’ status.
The data obtained suggest that the Th cell ratio underwent profound alterations, both within central memory cells, mirroring events occurring in lymphoid tissues, and in effector memory Th cells, regulating the functional activity of effector cells regarding the inflammatory focus via produced effector cytokines. For instance, a higher percentage of CM Th17 cells indicates that their elevated generation in lymphoid tissues may be related to the high level of “polarizing” Th17 cytokines in patients with this pathology.
In this regard, it was previously shown that an upregulated level of NLRP3 inflammasome and its correlation with disease activity evidence that activated NLRP3 is involved in AOSD pathogenesis [4]. The hyperactivation of the NLRP3 inflammasome subunit may result in the hyperproduction of active proinflammatory IL-1 family cytokines, primarily IL-1β and IL-18 [6,24]. In turn, these cytokines can elicit the activation of other downstream proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), involved in AOSD pathogenesis and triggering events related to induced inflammation and T cell “polarization” [25,26]. Moreover, the relative abundance of IL-17-secreting (Th17) cells in patients with active AOSD vs. control subjects was increased [27]. For instance, the peripheral blood Th17 cell level correlated with disease activity, ferritin levels as well as concentrations of serum cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, IL-18, IL-21, and IL-23. On the other hand, upon reaching the clinical remission phase, the peripheral blood level of Th17 cells and IL-17 as well as ferritin decreased compared with active AOSD. Our personal data, showing a decline in the CM Th17 cell level, indirectly corroborate that Th17 cells are specifically recruited to peripheral inflammatory foci.
It should also be noted that we revealed prominent alterations in Th17 cell subset composition, associated primarily with a lower percentage of CXCR3-expressing Th17 cells putatively due to their targeted recruitment of a gradient of CXCR3 ligands—CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11—to the site of inflammation. It should be mentioned that the serum level of pro-inflammatory chemokine CXCL10 in AOSD was markedly higher than in patients with RA and control subjects [28]. In addition, a strong relation between the CXCL10 level and validated markers of disease activity, including ferritin and AST as well as systemic assessment scores, was observed. Most patients with AOSD later experienced profoundly decreased CXCL10 levels after effective therapy, although a change in CXCL10 levels correlated solely with changed systemic parameters.
Moreover, CXCL10 and its cognate receptor CXCR3 were highly expressed in skin lesions, whereas increased CXCL10 accumulation was observed in inflammatory cells along with mucin deposits. Moreover, another study showed that apart from IFN-γ, the level of all three CXCR3 ligands—CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11—was increased in the peripheral blood of AOSD patients [29]. An increase in the level of such chemokines was closely related to the elevated amount of key peripheral blood inflammatory factors—C-reactive protein and ferritin. Moreover, the accumulation of CD4+ T cells at inflammatory sites was tightly linked to CXCL11 production.
Moreover, we found a prominent decline in the CM Th2 cell level in AOSD patients vs. control subjects, which also affected the Th1/Th2 cell ratio, which was skewed to a higher percentage of Th1 lymphocytes. It should be noted that in the active phase, IL-4 and IL-13, but not IFN-γ, IL-12, or IL-20 levels, were increased in patients with AOSD [30]. Moreover, serum IL-18 levels showed a good correlation with IL-4 levels, suggesting that AOSD is characterized by a Th2 rather than a Th1 cell cytokine profile. Our personal data also indicate that Th2 cells are actively involved in the pathogenesis of AOSD. On the other hand, new-onset AOSD is coupled to a higher level of circulating IFN-γ-producing Th1 cells paralleled with an increased Th1/Th2 cell ratio, verified by assessing the production of IFN-γ and IL-2, respectively [31]. Similar results were obtained while analyzing the gene expression levels of relevant cytokines in skin biopsy samples. Apart from this, the level of peripheral blood IFN-γ-producing Th1 cells was closely associated with a higher serum IL-18 level and AOSD clinical manifestations [31]. Three-month-long therapy with glucocorticoids and methotrexate revealed that patients with AOSD had decreased circulating IL-18 as well as peripheral blood IFN-γ+ Th1 cell levels.
We also observed a significantly altered profile in circulating CD8+ T cells, primarily manifested by their increased percentage in peripheral blood during AOSD, which is in line with the data obtained by Guo et al. [32]. Moreover, using cluster analysis, Guo et al. showed that patients with peak CD8+ T cell counts had maximum systemic scores at diagnosis and were more likely to have pulmonary infiltrates, pericarditis, splenomegaly, and poorer response to treatment as well as the highest total number of disease outbreaks. However, Jung et al. noted a significantly decreased CD8+ T cell level in AOSD compared to the control group [33]. It should also be noted that histological data in AOSD revealed an increased CD8+ T-cell count in the skin, liver, and bone marrow [34].
It is worth noting that we detected no changes in the CD8+ T-cell distribution across maturation stages. At the same time, some studies noted a higher percentage of peripheral blood “naïve” CD8+ T cells in AOSD [33]. On the other hand, a recent study by Chi et al. showed that during active AOSD, T cells are characterized by decreased levels of “naïve” cells and central memory cells, whereas the percentage of effector cells and effector memory cells increased [35]. Apparently, alterations in both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cell maturation are closely related to disease activity, which may underlie heterogeneity in the obtained data.
Moreover, while analyzing CD8+ T cells, we found a rise in the percentage of peripheral blood cytokine-producing Tc2 CD8+ T cells along with a decreased level of Tc1 cytolytic cells in patients with AOSD. It is also interesting to note that an inflamed lymph node biopsy from an AOSD patient revealed the dominance of CD8+ T cells, but only a small number of them expressed the maturity marker granzyme B [36] along with increased levels of Th2 cytokines, including IL-4 and IL-13 [30], which may also be related to an increased percentage of Tc2 cells at the systemic level. As noted above, patients with AOSD are characterized by high levels of CXCR3 ligands—CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11—powerfully recruiting CXCR3-expressing cells (including Tc1 with CXCR3+CCR6– phenotype) into inflamed tissue [29]. Moreover, the synovial membrane level of TNF-α mRNA expression, one of the key effector cytokines in Tc1 cells, in AOSD was significantly increased compared with osteoarthritis but remained significantly lower than that observed in rheumatoid arthritis [24], allowing us to assume that some relevant cells may produce this cytokine in developing arthritis during AOSD.
Interestingly, an inflamed lymph node biopsy from an AOSD patient uncovered that CD8+ T cells prevailed, among which only a few expressed the T-cell maturity marker granzyme B [36]. At the same time, the accumulation of granzyme B is more typical for mature Tc1 CD8+ T cells able to migrate to the site of inflammation, where it may participate in IL-18 proform cleavage into the active pro-inflammatory counterpart by analogy with caspase-1 and mast cell chymase [37,38]. Therefore, our data as well as sparse publications suggest that CD8+ T cells might be involved in the pathogenesis of AOSD, which requires further research.
We also observed an altered CD19+ B-cell profile in AOSD, which is in line with previously published data [34,38]. We found that such alterations were associated with a higher percentage of resting memory IgD–CD38– B cells and decreased ‘pre-germinal-center’ Bm2 cell levels. Chi et al. observed, in active AOSD, a decline in the percentage of naïve and memory B cells, whereas the level of circulating plasma cell precursors was increased [35]. It should be noted that IL-1β promotes B-cell activation, proliferation as well as differentiation into plasma cells [39], which may be closely related to high levels of this cytokine in AOSD during increased disease activity. In contrast, Fang et al. showed that active AOSD is paralleled with an increased percentage of “naïve” IgD+CD27– B cells, double-negative IgD–CD27– B cells as well as CD20–CD27hi plasmablasts, whereas the “regulatory” B-cell subsets—IgD+CD27+ and CD24hiCD27+—significantly decreased [40].
Regarding B-cell subsets with regulatory properties, we noted a decline in the level of peripheral blood CD5-expressing B cells in Still’s disease. Hallmark studies point to the fact that CD5+ B cells can be found in diverse human tissues being able to produce autoantibodies (including rheumatoid factor and anti-ssDNA antibodies), as well as higher counts of CD5+ B cells in autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren’s syndrome [41,42]. Unfortunately, little is currently known about the functional characteristics of such cells and their role in the pathogenesis of human autoimmune diseases. Laboratory animal models uncovered that CD5-expressing B cells belong to the B1a population typically localized in the peritoneal cavity and produce low-affinity IgM antibodies with autoreactive specificity [43]. Moreover, IL-10 synthesized by CD5+ B cells is involved in controlling autoimmune reactions in murine experimental encephalomyelitis [44]. CD5 in humans is found on the cell membrane of transitional CD24+++CD38++ T1 B cells [45], but based on recent studies, such cells compared to other transitional B-cell subsets produce IL-10 at a relatively low level [46]. Interestingly, patients suffering from NLRP1-associated autoinflammatory syndrome (also characterized by high IL-18 and IL-1β levels) had higher peripheral blood transitional B cells, bearing the regulatory phenotype CD24highCD38highCD27low/neg [47]. Hence, various populations of human “regulatory” B cells remain poorly characterized; however, in the case of some autoinflammatory and autoimmune disorders, they can be used as diagnostic markers and potential therapeutic targets.
Finally, our findings provide new insights into the development of targeted therapies for patients with AOSD. Currently, the management of AOSD is predominantly based on anti-inflammatory therapy, rather than disease–modifying anti–rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The concept of the “window of opportunity” for anti-cytokine therapy is extensively discussed, with a focus on IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors, primarily as first-line agents. It has been observed that initiating this class of drugs early is more effective and leads to a more enduring response. In refractory cases and in the development of HLH, Janus kinase inhibitors as well as interferon-gamma inhibitors are also considered [7]. Furthermore, the efficacy of canakinumab therapy on patients with sJIA, both clinically and in the laboratory, was demonstrated in clinical trials, where gene expression analysis was conducted three days after drug administration. There was a distinctive pattern, marked by the swift return to normal levels of transcripts related to sJIA overexpressed genes, including genes associated with IL-1 and IL-6 signaling pathways [48]. In another study assessing the dynamics of IL-1RA, IL-18, and IL-6, a reduction in these parameters was noted by the sixth week of canakinumab therapy [49]. Several cohort studies evaluating anakinra therapy have demonstrated consistent improvements in the mentioned cytokines, bringing them back to the normal range throughout the course of treatment [50,51]. However, some studies have demonstrated that IL-18, unlike other pro-inflammatory cytokines and proteins, does not decrease during remission [6].

5. Conclusions

We presented study data, attempting to analyze the circulating adaptive immune lymphocyte profile in AOSD patients by assessing the phenotypic characteristics of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as CD19+ B cells, by focusing on the relevant maturation and ‘polarization’ status. T-cell and B-cell subsets were significantly altered in patients with AOSD.

6. Limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the study was carried out using a small sample and heterogeneous patient cohort, an inherent limitation of AOSD as a very rare disease. Consequently, we refrained from comparing the clinical patient data with the peripheral blood immune cell profile.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb46020075/s1, Supplementary Table S1: List of monoclonal antibodies for immunophenotyping of peripheral blood CD4+ T-cell subsets; Supplementary Table S2: List of monoclonal antibodies for immunophenotyping of peripheral blood CD8+ T-cell subsets; Supplementary Table S3: List of monoclonal antibodies for immunophenotyping of peripheral blood CD19+ B cell subsets. Supplementary Figure S1: Flow cytometry gating strategy used to define CD4+ T-cell subsets. Supplementary Figure S2: Flow cytometry gating strategy used to define CD8+ T-cell subsets. Supplementary Figure S3: Flow cytometry gating strategy used to define CD19+ B-cell subsets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.K., V.M. and A.M.; methodology, I.K., A.G. and A.M.; investigation, A.A., A.R., I.K. and A.G.; resources, I.K., A.G. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, V.M. and I.K.; writing—review and editing, I.K., A.R., D.I., V.M. and A.M.; supervision, I.K. and A.M.; project administration, I.K. and A.M.; funding acquisition, patient supervision, V.M. and A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Agreement No. 075-15-2022-301).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Almazov National Medical Research Center (protocol code 28, 12 February 2018). All patients included in the study provided informed consent.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and supplementary material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Still, G.F. On a Form of Chronic Joint Disease in Children. Arch. Dis. Child. 1941, 16, 156–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bywaters, E.G. Still’s Disease in the Adult. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1971, 30, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nirmala, N.; Brachat, A.; Feist, E.; Blank, N.; Specker, C.; Witt, M.; Zernicke, J.; Martini, A.; Junge, G. Gene-expression Analysis of Adult-Onset Still’s Disease and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis is Consistent with a Continuum of a Single disease Entity. Pediatr. Rheumatol. 2015, 13, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gerfaud-Valentin, M.; Jamilloux, Y.; Iwaz, J.; Sève, P. Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2014, 13, 708–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jia, J.; Wang, M.; Ma, Y.; Meng, J.; Zhu, D.; Chen, X.; Shi, H.; Sun, Y.; Liu, H.; Cheng, X.; et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Induced Intermediate Monocytes Trigger Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. BMC Med. 2023, 21, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Inoue, N.; Shimizu, M.; Tsunoda, S.; Kawano, M.; Matsumura, M.; Yachie, A. Cytokine Profile in Adult-Onset Still’s Disease: Comparison with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Clin. Immunol. 2016, 169, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruscitti, P.; Cantarini, L.; Nigrovic, P.A.; McGonagle, D.; Giacomelli, R. Recent Advances and Evolving Concepts in Still’s Disease. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2024. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feist, E.; Mitrovic, S.; Fautrel, B. Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Targets for Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018, 14, 603–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hsieh, C.-W.; Chen, Y.-M.; Lin, C.-C.; Tang, K.-T.; Chen, H.-H.; Hung, W.-T.; Lai, K.-L.; Chen, D.-Y. Elevated Expression of the NLRP3 Inflammasome and Its Correlation with Disease Activity in Adult-Onset Still Disease. J. Rheumatol. 2017, 44, 1142–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hutton, H.L.; Ooi, J.D.; Holdsworth, S.R.; Kitching, A.R. The NLRP3 Inflammasome in Kidney Disease and Autoimmunity. Nephrol. Carlton Vic. 2016, 21, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ben-Sasson, S.Z.; Wang, K.; Cohen, J.; Paul, W.E. IL-1β Strikingly Enhances Antigen-Driven CD4 and CD8 T-Cell Responses. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2013, 78, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bent, R.; Moll, L.; Grabbe, S.; Bros, M. Interleukin-1 Beta-A Friend or Foe in Malignancies? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yamaguchi, M.; Ohta, A.; Tsunematsu, T.; Kasukawa, R.; Mizushima, Y.; Kashiwagi, H.; Kashiwazaki, S.; Tanimoto, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Ota, T. Preliminary Criteria for Classification of Adult Still’s Disease. J. Rheumatol. 1992, 19, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Rau, M.; Schiller, M.; Krienke, S.; Heyder, P.; Lorenz, H.; Blank, N. Clinical Manifestations but Not Cytokine Profiles Differentiate Adult-Onset Still’s Disease and Sepsis. J. Rheumatol. 2010, 37, 2369–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Golovkin, A.; Kalinina, O.; Bezrukikh, V.; Aquino, A.; Zaikova, E.; Karonova, T.; Melnik, O.; Vasilieva, E.; Kudryavtsev, I. Imbalanced Immune Response of T-Cell and B-Cell Subsets in Patients with Moderate and Severe COVID-19. Viruses 2021, 13, 1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kudryavtsev, I.V.; Arsentieva, N.A.; Korobova, Z.R.; Isakov, D.V.; Rubinstein, A.A.; Batsunov, O.K.; Khamitova, I.V.; Kuznetsova, R.N.; Savin, T.V.; Akisheva, T.V.; et al. Heterogenous CD8+ T Cell Maturation and “Polarization” in Acute and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients. Viruses 2022, 14, 1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dankers, W.; den Braanker, H.; Paulissen, S.M.J.; van Hamburg, J.P.; Davelaar, N.; Colin, E.M.; Lubberts, E. The Heterogeneous Human Memory CCR6+ T Helper-17 Populations Differ in T-Bet and Cytokine Expression but All Activate Synovial Fibroblasts in an IFNγ-Independent Manner. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2021, 23, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kotake, S.; Yago, T.; Kobashigawa, T.; Nanke, Y. The Plasticity of Th17 Cells in the Pathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Clin. Med. 2017, 6, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morita, R.; Schmitt, N.; Bentebibel, S.-E.; Ranganathan, R.; Bourdery, L.; Zurawski, G.; Foucat, E.; Dullaers, M.; Oh, S.; Sabzghabaei, N.; et al. Human Blood CXCR5(+)CD4(+) T Cells Are Counterparts of T Follicular Cells and Contain Specific Subsets That Differentially Support Antibody Secretion. Immunity 2011, 34, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hutloff, A. T Follicular Helper-Like Cells in Inflamed Non-Lymphoid Tissues. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Loyal, L.; Warth, S.; Jürchott, K.; Mölder, F.; Nikolaou, C.; Babel, N.; Nienen, M.; Durlanik, S.; Stark, R.; Kruse, B.; et al. SLAMF7 and IL-6R Define Distinct Cytotoxic versus Helper Memory CD8+ T Cells. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trombke, J.; Loyal, L.; Braun, J.; Pleyer, U.; Thiel, A.; Pohlmann, D. Analysis of Peripheral Inflammatory T Cell Subsets and Their Effector Function in Patients with Birdshot Retinochoroiditis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bohnhorst, J.Ø.; Bjørgan, M.B.; Thoen, J.E.; Natvig, J.B.; Thompson, K.M. Bm1-Bm5 Classification of Peripheral Blood B Cells Reveals Circulating Germinal Center Founder Cells in Healthy Individuals and Disturbance in the B Cell Subpopulations in Patients with Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 3610–3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, D.-Y.; Lan, J.-L.; Lin, F.-J.; Hsieh, T.-Y. Proinflammatory Cytokine Profiles in Sera and Pathological Tissues of Patients with Active Untreated Adult Onset Still’s Disease. J. Rheumatol. 2004, 31, 2189–2198. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, S.; Zheng, S.; Tang, S.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, S.; Fang, H.; Qiao, J. Autoinflammatory Pathogenesis and Targeted Therapy for Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2020, 58, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sfriso, P.; Bindoli, S.; Galozzi, P. Adult-Onset Still’s Disease: Molecular Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Advances. Drugs 2018, 78, 1187–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, D.-Y.; Chen, Y.-M.; Lan, J.-L.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, H.-H.; Hsieh, C.-W. Potential Role of Th17 Cells in the Pathogenesis of Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Rheumatol. Oxf. Engl. 2010, 49, 2305–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Han, J.H.; Suh, C.-H.; Jung, J.-Y.; Nam, J.-Y.; Kwon, J.E.; Yim, H.; Kim, H.-A. Association of CXCL10 and CXCL13 Levels with Disease Activity and Cutaneous Manifestation in Active Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Han, J.H.; Suh, C.-H.; Jung, J.-Y.; Ahn, M.-H.; Han, M.H.; Kwon, J.E.; Yim, H.; Kim, H.-A. Elevated Circulating Levels of the Interferon-γ-Induced Chemokines Are Associated with Disease Activity and Cutaneous Manifestations in Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saiki, O.; Uda, H.; Nishimoto, N.; Miwa, T.; Mima, T.; Ogawara, T.; Azuma, N.; Katada, Y.; Sawaki, J.; Tsutsui, H.; et al. Adult Still’s Disease Reflects a Th2 Rather than a Th1 Cytokine Profile. Clin. Immunol. Orlando Fla. 2004, 112, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, D.Y.; Lan, J.L.; Lin, F.J.; Hsieh, T.Y.; Wen, M.C. Predominance of Th1 Cytokine in Peripheral Blood and Pathological Tissues of Patients with Active Untreated Adult Onset Still’s Disease. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2004, 63, 1300–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, R.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Meng, X.; Li, R.; Chen, X.; Lu, L. AOSD Endotypes Based on Immune Cell Profiles: Patient Stratification with Hierarchical Clustering Analysis. Rheumatol. Oxf. Engl. 2023, 62, 1636–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jung, J.-Y.; Choi, B.; Sayeed, H.M.; Suh, C.-H.; Kim, Y.W.; Kim, H.-A.; Sohn, S. Characteristic Patterns of HLA Presentation and T Cell Differentiation in Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2018, 32, 2058738418791284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, H.-A.; Kwon, J.E.; Yim, H.; Suh, C.-H.; Jung, J.-Y.; Han, J.H. The Pathologic Findings of Skin, Lymph Node, Liver, and Bone Marrow in Patients with Adult-Onset Still Disease. Medicine 2015, 94, e787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chi, H.; Hong, X.; Dai, N.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Cheng, X.; Ye, J.; Shi, H.; Hu, Q.; et al. The Landscape of Innate and Adaptive Immune Cell Subsets in Patients with Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Rheumatol. Oxf. Engl. 2023, kead507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, Z.; Xu, H.; Min, Q.; Li, Z.; Bi, J.; Liu, L.; Liang, Y. Adult-Onset Still’s Disease with Multiple Lymphadenopathy: A Case Report and Literature Review. Diagn. Pathol. 2021, 16, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Omoto, Y.; Yamanaka, K.; Tokime, K.; Kitano, S.; Kakeda, M.; Akeda, T.; Kurokawa, I.; Gabazza, E.C.; Tsutsui, H.; Katayama, N.; et al. Granzyme B Is a Novel Interleukin-18 Converting Enzyme. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2010, 59, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Akeda, T.; Yamanaka, K.; Tsuda, K.; Omoto, Y.; Gabazza, E.C.; Mizutani, H. CD8+ T Cell Granzyme B Activates Keratinocyte Endogenous IL-18. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2014, 306, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lipsky, P.E.; Thompson, P.A.; Rosenwasser, L.J.; Dinarello, C.A. The Role of Interleukin 1 in Human B Cell Activation: Inhibition of B Cell Proliferation and the Generation of Immunoglobulin-Secreting Cells by an Antibody against Human Leukocytic Pyrogen. J. Immunol. 1983, 130, 2708–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fang, X.; Ye, H.; Xie, Y.; Wei, C.; Liu, S.; Yao, H.; Li, Z.; Jia, Y.; Hu, F. B Cell Subsets in Adult-Onset Still’s Disease: Potential Candidates for Disease Pathogenesis and Immunophenotyping. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2023, 25, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burastero, S.E.; Casali, P.; Wilder, R.L.; Notkins, A.L. Monoreactive High Affinity and Polyreactive Low Affinity Rheumatoid Factors Are Produced by CD5+ B Cells from Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 1988, 168, 1979–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dauphinée, M.; Tovar, Z.; Talal, N. B Cells Expressing CD5 Are Increased in Sjögren’s Syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1988, 31, 642–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kantor, A.B.; Herzenberg, L.A. Origin of Murine B Cell Lineages. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1993, 11, 501–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fillatreau, S.; Sweenie, C.H.; McGeachy, M.J.; Gray, D.; Anderton, S.M. B Cells Regulate Autoimmunity by Provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sims, G.P.; Ettinger, R.; Shirota, Y.; Yarboro, C.H.; Illei, G.G.; Lipsky, P.E. Identification and Characterization of Circulating Human Transitional B Cells. Blood 2005, 105, 4390–4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Simon, Q.; Pers, J.-O.; Cornec, D.; Le Pottier, L.; Mageed, R.A.; Hillion, S. In-Depth Characterization of CD24(High)CD38(High) Transitional Human B Cells Reveals Different Regulatory Profiles. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 1577–1584.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Grandemange, S.; Sanchez, E.; Louis-Plence, P.; Tran Mau-Them, F.; Bessis, D.; Coubes, C.; Frouin, E.; Seyger, M.; Girard, M.; Puechberty, J.; et al. A New Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Syndrome Associated with NLRP1 Mutations: NAIAD (NLRP1-Associated Autoinflammation with Arthritis and Dyskeratosis). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1191–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Brachat, A.H.; Grom, A.A.; Wulffraat, N.; Brunner, H.I.; Quartier, P.; Brik, R.; McCann, L.; Ozdogan, H.; Rutkowska-Sak, L.; Schneider, R.; et al. Early Changes in Gene Expression and Inflammatory Proteins in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients on Canakinumab Therapy. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017, 19, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ghannam, K.; Zernicke, J.; Kedor, C.; Listing, J.; Burmester, G.R.; Foell, D.; Feist, E. Distinct Effects of Interleukin-1β Inhibition upon Cytokine Profile in Patients with Adult-Onset Still’s Disease and Active Articular Manifestation Responding to Canakinumab. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fitzgerald, A.A.; LeClercq, S.A.; Yan, A.; Homik, J.E.; Dinarello, C.A. Rapid Responses to Anakinra in Patients with Refractory Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52, 1794–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kötter, I.; Wacker, A.; Koch, S.; Henes, J.; Richter, C.; Engel, A.; Günaydin, I.; Kanz, L. Anakinra in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Adult-Onset Still’s Disease: Four Case Reports with Serial Cytokine Measurements and a Review of the Literature. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 37, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cimb 46 00075 g001
Figure 1. Alterations in Th cell maturation and ‘polarization’ in patients with AOSD. Scatter plots (A–D) show the frequencies of ‘naïve’, central memory (CM), effector memory (EM), and terminally differentiated CD45RA-positive effector memory (TEMRA) CD4+ T cells within total CD4+ T cells, respectively. Scatter plots (E–H) show Th1, Th2, Th17, and follicular Th frequencies within total CD4+ T cells, respectively. Black circles—patients with AOSD (AOSD, n = 7); white circles—healthy control (HC, n = 15). Each dot on scatter plots represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars show the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75)). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Figure 1. Alterations in Th cell maturation and ‘polarization’ in patients with AOSD. Scatter plots (A–D) show the frequencies of ‘naïve’, central memory (CM), effector memory (EM), and terminally differentiated CD45RA-positive effector memory (TEMRA) CD4+ T cells within total CD4+ T cells, respectively. Scatter plots (E–H) show Th1, Th2, Th17, and follicular Th frequencies within total CD4+ T cells, respectively. Black circles—patients with AOSD (AOSD, n = 7); white circles—healthy control (HC, n = 15). Each dot on scatter plots represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars show the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75)). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Cimb 46 00075 g001
Cimb 46 00075 g002
Figure 2. Alterations in relative numbers of Th2 and Th17 cell subsets in patients with AOSD. Scatter plots (A–H) show the frequencies of Th1, Th2, Th17, and follicular Th within total CM and EM CD4+ T cells, respectively. Black circles denote patients with AOSD (AOSD, n = 7); white circles—healthy control (HC, n = 15). Each dot on scatter plots represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars show the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75)). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Figure 2. Alterations in relative numbers of Th2 and Th17 cell subsets in patients with AOSD. Scatter plots (A–H) show the frequencies of Th1, Th2, Th17, and follicular Th within total CM and EM CD4+ T cells, respectively. Black circles denote patients with AOSD (AOSD, n = 7); white circles—healthy control (HC, n = 15). Each dot on scatter plots represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars show the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75)). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Cimb 46 00075 g002
Cimb 46 00075 g003
Figure 3. Alterations in CD8+ T-cell maturation and ‘polarization’ in patients with AOSD. Scatter plots (A–D) show the percentages of ‘naïve’, central memory (CM), effector memory (EM), and TEMRA CD8+ T cells within total CD8+ T cells, respectively. Scatter plots (E–H) show Tc1, Tc2, Tc17, and Tc17.1 cells, respectively. Black circles denote patients with AOSD (AOSD, n = 7); white circles—healthy control (HC, n = 15). Each dot represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars depict the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75)). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Figure 3. Alterations in CD8+ T-cell maturation and ‘polarization’ in patients with AOSD. Scatter plots (A–D) show the percentages of ‘naïve’, central memory (CM), effector memory (EM), and TEMRA CD8+ T cells within total CD8+ T cells, respectively. Scatter plots (E–H) show Tc1, Tc2, Tc17, and Tc17.1 cells, respectively. Black circles denote patients with AOSD (AOSD, n = 7); white circles—healthy control (HC, n = 15). Each dot represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars depict the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75)). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Cimb 46 00075 g003
Cimb 46 00075 g004
Figure 4. Imbalance in peripheral blood Tc1, Tc2, Tc17, and Tc17.1 cells in major CD8+ T-cell subsets with varying patterns of CD45RA and CD62L expression in patients with AOSD. Scatter plots (A–P) show the relative numbers of Tc1, Tc2, Tc17 andTc17.1 cells within ‘naïve’, central memory, effector memory, and TEMRA CD8+ T cells, respectively. Black circles denote patients with AOSD (AOSD, n = 7); white circles—healthy control (HC, n = 15). Each dot represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars depict the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75)). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Figure 4. Imbalance in peripheral blood Tc1, Tc2, Tc17, and Tc17.1 cells in major CD8+ T-cell subsets with varying patterns of CD45RA and CD62L expression in patients with AOSD. Scatter plots (A–P) show the relative numbers of Tc1, Tc2, Tc17 andTc17.1 cells within ‘naïve’, central memory, effector memory, and TEMRA CD8+ T cells, respectively. Black circles denote patients with AOSD (AOSD, n = 7); white circles—healthy control (HC, n = 15). Each dot represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars depict the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75)). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Cimb 46 00075 g004
Cimb 46 00075 g005
Figure 5. Decreased relative number of CD5+CD27– B cells in patients with AOSD. Representative dot plots showing expression of CD5 vs. CD27 in a patient with AOSD (A) and healthy control subject (B). Scatter plots (C) show the relative number of CD5+CD27– cells among total B-cell subset, respectively, in the peripheral blood samples from patients with AOSD (n = 7, black circles, AOSD) and healthy controls (n = 15, white circles, HC). Each dot represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars represent the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Figure 5. Decreased relative number of CD5+CD27– B cells in patients with AOSD. Representative dot plots showing expression of CD5 vs. CD27 in a patient with AOSD (A) and healthy control subject (B). Scatter plots (C) show the relative number of CD5+CD27– cells among total B-cell subset, respectively, in the peripheral blood samples from patients with AOSD (n = 7, black circles, AOSD) and healthy controls (n = 15, white circles, HC). Each dot represents individual subjects, and horizontal bars represent the group medians and quartile ranges (Med (Q25; Q75). The p-value was determined by the Mann–Whitney U-test.
Cimb 46 00075 g005
Table 1. General characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, treatment of patients with adult-onset Still’s disease during the relapse.
Table 1. General characteristics, clinical and laboratory data, treatment of patients with adult-onset Still’s disease during the relapse.
NPatient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Patient 5Patient 6Patient 7
Age, years old28262163304352
Sex2211222
Years of disease10312<1186
CoursePolycyclicPolycyclicPolycyclicPolycyclicMonocyclicPolycyclicPolycyclic
Modified Pouchot’s score [14]5584442
Laboratory data
White blood cells × 109/L (4.0–9.0)9.013.112.817.812.813.36.1
Neutrophils × 109/L
(2.0–5.8)		5.78.310.314.99.09.73.8
Neutrophils (%)63.563.281.084.070.073.262.0
Lymphocytes × 109/L
(1.2–3.2)		2.53.82.31.73.82.11.7
NLR2.282.184.478.762.364.62.23
Platelets (150–400)411430228394428561215
C–reactive protein, mg/L (0.0–5.0)117.08.245.051.922.6231.06.4
Ferritin, ng/mL (30.0–150)5125518001218311219151
ALT, U/L (0.00–33)12166736121014
AST, U/L (5.0–32)17174918121116
Clinical data
Fever111111-
Sore throat-111-1-
Pericarditis-11----
Pleuritis-11----
Artrhitis111-11-
Arthralgia1111111
Myalgia111-11-
Rush11111-1
Lymphadenopathy1111---
Splenomegaly--1----
Hepatomegaly--11---
Treatment
on relapse		low dose of NSAIDsprednisolone 6.25 mg, methotrexate 20 mglow dose of NSAIDslow dose of NSAIDsNSAIDs (ibuprofen 2400 mg) pantoprazol 40 mgPrednis-olone 10 mgPrednis-olone 5 mg, metho-trexate 15 mg
Abbreviations: ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; NLR, Neutrophil–Lymphocyte Ratio; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; (-)—sign is absent during the relapse.
Table 2. Imbalance in circulating Th17 cell subsets in patients with AOSD.
Table 2. Imbalance in circulating Th17 cell subsets in patients with AOSD.
Th17 Cell SubsetsPhenotypeAOSD
(n = 7)		Healthy Control (n = 15)p Value
Med (Q25; Q75)Med (Q25; Q75)
% within CM CCR6+ Th17:
DN Th17CCR4–CXCR3–26.51 (20.39; 42.77)3.27 (2.67; 4.28)<0.001
class Th17CCR4+CXCR3–26.31 (19.32; 30.37)35.37 (27.72; 42.65)0.022
Th17.1CCR4–CXCR3+16.60 (15.01; 38.03)32.52 (22.66; 35.55)0.192
DP Th17CCR4+CXCR3+19.11 (10.87; 28.20)31.39 (26.61;37.05)0.005
% EM within CCR6+ Th17:
DN Th17CCR4–CXCR3–6.55 (2.94; 11.83)1.66 (1.53; 3.01)0.015
class Th17CCR4+CXCR3–42.20 (33.62; 46.01)21.94 (18.65; 25.66)0.008
Th17.1CCR4–CXCR3+23.06 (17.63; 31.09)47.85 (45.77; 52.17)<0.001
DP Th17CCR4+CXCR3+33.07 (20.28; 34.96)27.08 (21.61; 31.60)0.275
Table 3. Imbalance in circulating CXCR5-expressing follicular Th cell subsets in patients with AOSD.
Table 3. Imbalance in circulating CXCR5-expressing follicular Th cell subsets in patients with AOSD.
Tfh Cell SubsetsPhenotypeAOSD
(n = 7)		Healthy Control (n = 15)p
Value
Med (Q25; Q75)Med (Q25; Q75)
% CM CCR6+ Tfh:
Tfh1CCR6–CXCR3+29.37 (25.38; 31.79)27.07 (24.23; 31.27)0.503
Tfh2CCR6–CXCR3–17.00 (11.34; 25.48)19.23 (14.12; 22.54)0.698
Tfh17CCR6+CXCR3–24.63 (21.75; 27.81)33.64 (27.26; 37.29)0.008
DP TfhCCR6+CXCR3+27.31 (18.09; 33.42)20.76 (18.78; 21.91)0.130
% EM CCR6+ Tfh:
Tfh1CCR6–CXCR3+25.26 (12.62; 40.94)22.89 (15.90; 28.48)0.459
Tfh2CCR6–CXCR3–6.94 (1.57; 11.70)14.23 (9.89; 18.58)0.010
Tfh17CCR6+CXCR3–35.23 (19.69; 46.94)41.82 (37.10; 48.29)0.148
DP TfhCCR6+CXCR3+31.53 (22.40; 37.80)18.86 (17.00; 23.48)0.007
Table 4. Imbalance in circulating B-cell subsets in patients with AOSD.
Table 4. Imbalance in circulating B-cell subsets in patients with AOSD.
B Cell SubsetsPhenotypeAOSD
(n = 7)		Healthy Control (n = 15)p Value
Med (Q25; Q75)Med (Q25; Q75)
Bm1IgD+CD38–9.39 (5.92; 41.21)7.90 (3.70; 9.88)0.307
Bm2IgD+CD38+50.10 (39.08; 56.04)60.41 (52.18; 68.75)0.053
Bm2′IgD+CD38++3.73 (0.43; 7.12)8.21 (5.46; 9.70)0.045
Bm3 + Bm4IgD–CD38+++1.79 (0.26; 4.31)1.61 (1.37; 2.39)0.972
eBm5IgD–CD38+10.71 (8.66; 13.86)13.86 (11.27; 17.82)0.105
Bm5IgD–CD38–15.80 (9.89; 19.22)6.30 (4.54; 8.19)0.018
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Myachikova, V.; Kudryavtsev, I.; Rubinstein, A.; Aquino, A.; Isakov, D.; Golovkin, A.; Maslyanskiy, A. Deep Immunophenotyping of Circulating T and B Cells in Relapsing Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 1177-1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46020075

AMA Style

Myachikova V, Kudryavtsev I, Rubinstein A, Aquino A, Isakov D, Golovkin A, Maslyanskiy A. Deep Immunophenotyping of Circulating T and B Cells in Relapsing Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2024; 46(2):1177-1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46020075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Myachikova, Valentina, Igor Kudryavtsev, Artem Rubinstein, Arthur Aquino, Dmitry Isakov, Alexey Golovkin, and Alexey Maslyanskiy. 2024. "Deep Immunophenotyping of Circulating T and B Cells in Relapsing Adult-Onset Still’s Disease" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46, no. 2: 1177-1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46020075

APA Style

Myachikova, V., Kudryavtsev, I., Rubinstein, A., Aquino, A., Isakov, D., Golovkin, A., & Maslyanskiy, A. (2024). Deep Immunophenotyping of Circulating T and B Cells in Relapsing Adult-Onset Still’s Disease. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46(2), 1177-1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46020075

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop