Next Article in Journal
VEGF as a Key Actor in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Oral Cancer: Prophylaxis, Etiopathogenesis and Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Examining the Potential Applicability of Orexigenic and Anorexigenic Peptides in Veterinary Medicine for the Management of Obesity in Companion Animals
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Tissue Engineered 3D Model of Cancer Cell Invasion for Human Head and Neck Squamous-Cell Carcinoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Potential MicroRNA Diagnostic Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue

1
Department of Dental Hygiene, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon 39528, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Gimcheon University, Gimcheon 39528, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(7), 6746-6756; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46070402
Submission received: 15 May 2024 / Revised: 22 June 2024 / Accepted: 25 June 2024 / Published: 1 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Cancer: Prophylaxis, Etiopathogenesis and Treatment)

Abstract

:
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of the tongue is a common type of head and neck malignancy with a poor prognosis, underscoring the urgency for early detection. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have remarkable stability and are easily measurable. Thus, miRNAs may be a promising biomarker candidate among biomarkers in cancer diagnosis. Biomarkers have the potential to facilitate personalized medicine approaches by guiding treatment decisions and optimizing therapy regimens for individual patients. Utilizing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we identified 13 differentially expressed upregulated miRNAs in OSCC of the tongue. Differentially expressed miRNAs were analyzed by enrichment analysis to reveal underlying biological processes, pathways, or functions. Furthermore, we identified miRNAs associated with the progression of OSCC of the tongue, utilizing receiver operating characteristic analysis to evaluate their potential as diagnostic biomarkers. A total of 13 upregulated miRNAs were identified as differentially expressed in OSCC of the tongue. Five of these miRNAs had high diagnostic power. In particular, miR-196b has the potential to serve as one of the most effective diagnostic biomarkers. Then, functional enrichment analysis for the target gene of miR-196b was performed, and a protein–protein interaction network was constructed. This study assessed an effective approach for identifying miRNAs as early diagnostic markers for OSCC of the tongue.

1. Introduction

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of the tongue is the most common cancer in the squamous cells of the tongue and is marked by an insidious nature [1]. It represents a significant portion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cases and accounts for approximately 31.9% of oral cavity cancers [2,3]. The main risk factors associated with the development of tongue cancer are tobacco smoking and excessive alcohol consumption. The early symptoms of OSCC are foreign body sensation or swallowing pain [4]. The treatment of tongue cancer is contingent upon the staging and anatomical site of the tumor, typically necessitating an approach encompassing surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Persistent investigation into early detection modalities and precision therapies is imperative for enhancing the therapeutic outcomes for individuals afflicted with tongue cancer. OSCC is one of the most diagnosed malignancies and a prominent contributor to mortality attributed to head and neck cancers [5]. OSCC has a poor prognosis because of the lack of a strong barrier for preventing tumor propagation [6]. Anticipating the prognosis of individuals diagnosed with OSCC holds importance in devising treatment strategies. In the early stage of OSCC, which is marked by a favorable prognosis, cancer-related mortality affects approximately 19% of patients [7]. The early detection of cancer correlates with elevated survival rates and diminished healthcare expenditures among patients, owing to decreased dependence on aggressive therapeutic modalities [8]. Early detection and treatment can greatly improve the prognosis for patients with OSCC [9].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNAs that play crucial roles in the regulation of gene expression and comprise approximately 22 nucleotides [10,11]. miRNAs operate by binding to messenger RNA molecules, thereby either inhibiting translation initiation or degrading mRNA [12]. miRNAs exhibit differential expression, being either upregulated or downregulated and are associated with the status and progression of tumors [13]. Several miRNAs have enhanced potential as biomarkers for diagnosing or monitoring specific cancers because they demonstrate cancer-specific expression patterns [14]. miRNA plays a crucial role in understanding the biological processes of tumors and developing treatment strategies.
The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) resource serves as a platform for the diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapy of cancer, including the exploration of potential miRNA-based biomarkers [15,16,17]. Graphical representations such as heatmaps and volcano plots facilitate the visualization of miRNA expression patterns and distinguish differential expression profiles. The objective of our study was to identify certain miRNAs essential for diagnosing OSCC by employing a methodology based on TCGA data. This approach, which includes diagnostic tools, discriminates between malignant and adjacent nontumorous tissues with remarkable sensitivity and specificity. Among the myriad candidates scrutinized, five miRNAs emerged as promising contenders for OSCC diagnosis, emphasizing their potential as biomarkers to augment the clinical management of tongue cancer, particularly in the early stages. Our investigation prioritized the exploration of biomarkers aimed at discerning OSCC. Utilizing bioinformatics, we performed a comprehensive analysis of OSCC transcriptome data, aiming to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying OSCC development and to identify specific molecules critical for its progression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Acquisition of TCGA Data

The miRNA expression profiles of OSCCs were downloaded from the TCGA data portal (http://firebrowse.org/, accessed on 3 May 2024), comprising 128 tumor samples and 13 adjacent nontumorous tissue samples. OSCC expression profiles were extracted from the TCGA HNSCC dataset, with the primary tumor site filtered to include only those of the tongue within the HNSCC dataset. Each sample comprised 1046 miRNA expression values obtained through the Illumina HiSeq platform. The miRNA expression profiles were generated using miRNA sequencing data, which represented a record of the reads per million miRNAs that were mapped. Clinical information regarding OSCC was sourced from the TCGA data portal. Table 1 presents comprehensive characteristics of the study, including genders, ages, pathologic stages, and tumor-node-metastasis classifications.

2.2. Selection of Candidate Diagnostic miRNAs

Identifying miRNAs as candidate biomarkers provides an important approach for advancing cancer diagnosis. Due to their stability and specificity, miRNAs are excellent diagnostic tools. Their utilization can lead to the development of accurate and sensitive diagnostic assays. By identifying cancer-specific miRNAs, researchers can improve early detection and treatment strategies for individual cancer patients. Heatmap analysis and volcano plots serve as valuable tools in elucidating discernible patterns of miRNA expression [18,19]. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves can provide evaluations of the accuracy of the predictive model selection of biomarkers [20]. The area under the curve (AUC) is a fundamental metric obtained from the ROC curve, offering a holistic evaluation of a diagnostic test’s performance. It quantifies the ability of a diagnostic test to discriminate between disease cases and non-cases [21]. A higher AUC indicates better diagnostic performance [22]. In studies evaluating diagnostic value, an AUC exceeding 0.90 indicates excellent diagnostic performance of the test [23]. We selected differentially expressed miRNAs, which were analyzed using a heatmap and a volcano plot. Subsequently, ROC curves were generated, and the AUC was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). ROC analysis identifies the optimal cutoff point, where sensitivity and specificity are maximized, for diagnostic biomarker values [24]. The point on the curve that maximizes the Youden Index is selected as the optimal threshold [24]. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were computed using GraphPad Prism software 6.0. miRNAs exhibiting an AUC > 0.9 were identified as potential diagnostic biomarkers.

2.3. Prediction of microRNA Targets

Predicting the target genes of miRNAs is crucial for regulating gene expression within cells and comprehending their involvement in the progress of cancers [25]. Studying miRNA–target interactions could reveal the biological function of certain miRNAs. We identified potential target mRNAs through the online miRNA prediction database miRDB (https://mirdb.org/, accessed on 8 May 2024). miRDB is a database for miRNA target prediction and functional annotation [26].

2.4. Functional Enrichment Analysis

Functional enrichment analysis is a bioinformatics computational method utilized for the interpretation of large-scale omics data, such as gene expression profiles or genomic datasets. Functional enrichment analysis assists researchers with uncovering the underlying biological mechanisms associated with observed experimental results. Gene ontology (GO)-based approaches utilize functional annotations to predict cancer driver genes [27]. The GO provides a hierarchical framework of terms organized into three main categories, including biological process, molecular function, and cellular component. Each term within GO represents a specific biological activity, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of gene functions and cellular organization. GO analysis was conducted using the DAVID online tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/, accessed on 10 May 2024). DAVID is a widely used bioinformatics resource system, comprising a web service for functional enrichment analysis and annotation [28]. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) is a comprehensive database and resource that links genomic information to higher-order functional information [29]. A p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. KEGG provides a suite of tools dedicated to pathway enrichment analysis, facilitating the identify of biological pathways related to a set of genes or proteins.

2.5. Protein–Protein Interaction Network

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks facilitate the identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in cancer research by elucidating altered protein interactions within cancer cells [30]. PPI network exploration utilized the Search Tool for Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database, a widely acknowledged resource for protein interaction data analysis (https://string-db.org/, accessed on 27 May 2024) [31]. Visualization of the network analysis was accomplished using Cytoscape software 3.9.1. CytoHubba was used to score node genes using the maximum clique centrality (MCC) algorithm [32].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Data analysis and visualization were conducted using GraphPad Prism software 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The independent samples t-test was used to determine statistical differences between groups. ROC curve analysis was employed, and the AUC was calculated to assess the diagnostic significance. A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was applied for statistical interpretation.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Differentially Expressed miRNAs in OSCC Patients from TCGA Database

A differential expression analysis was performed to identify miRNA expression levels that exhibited significant differences between OSCC tissues and adjacent nontumorous tissues (Figure 1). TCGA data were utilized for this analysis, which contrasted miRNA expression patterns in OSCC patients with those in HNSCC patients. A total of 13 upregulated miRNAs were identified as differentially expressed through heatmap analysis, with visualization facilitated by MultiExperiment Viewer 4.9.0 (Figure S1). Differentially expressed miRNAs with a p-value less than 0.05 and significant log2 fold changes were identified and visualized on the volcano plot [33]. The volcano plot was created using GraphPad Prism 6.0. (Figure 2).

3.2. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Values of the Five Potential miRNAs

Among the thirteen upregulated miRNAs, the AUC values (with a 95% CI) of hsa-miR-196a-1, hsa-miR-196b, hsa-miR-450a-2, hsa-miR-503, and hsa-miR-877 were 0.9447 (0.8991–0.9903), 0.9838 (0.9661–1.001), 0.9303 (0.8588–1.002), 0.9549 (0.9153–0.9946), and 0.9285 (0.8791–0.9779), respectively (Figure S2). These AUC values indicate the discriminative ability of each miRNA in distinguishing between OSCC tissues and adjacent nontumorous tissues, with higher values indicating better diagnostic efficacy. Notably, miR-196b exhibited the highest diagnostic value among the miRNAs evaluated. Detailed diagnostic values for five differentially expressed miRNAs are presented in Table 2.

3.3. Gene Ontology and KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis

We conducted a custom prediction search for the 369 target genes of miR-196b-5p and the 48 target genes of miR-196b-3p using miRDB. The results of the target genes for miR-196b-5p and miR-196b-3p are presented in Table S1. Furthermore, we utilized the DAVID database to identify potential biological functions of the target genes of miR-196b-5p and miR-196b-3p through GO enrichment analyses. The biological process group of the target genes of miR-196b-5p consisted of positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II (GO:0045944), embryonic skeletal system morphogenesis (GO:0048704), and anterior/posterior pattern specification (GO:0009952). The biological process group of the target genes of miR-196b-3p included RNA 3′ uridylation (GO:0071076), positive regulation of 3′-UTR-mediated mRNA stabilization (GO:1905870), and a defense response to Gram-negative bacteria (GO:0050829). The cellular component group of the target genes of miR-196b-5p comprised nucleoplasm (GO:0005654), nucleus (GO:0005634), and cytoplasmic stress granule (GO:0010494). The cellular component group of the target genes of miR-196b-3p included cytoplasm (GO:0005737), cilium (GO:0005929), and cytosol (GO:0005829). The molecular function group of the target genes of miR-196b-5p included transcriptional activator activity, RNA polymerase II transcription (GO:0001228), DNA binding (GO:0003677), and chromatin binding (GO:0003682). The molecular function group of the target genes of miR-196b-5p consisted of calcium ion binding (GO:0005509) and lipopolysaccharide binding (GO:0001530). GO analysis of target genes is shown in Table S2. The KEGG pathway was mainly enriched in axon guidance (hsa04360), spinocerebellar ataxia (hsa05017), the MAPK signaling pathway (hsa04010), the Ras signaling pathway (hsa04014), the mRNA surveillance pathway (hsa03015), mitophagy (hsa04137), and protein digestion and absorption (hsa04974). The results of KEGG enrichment analysis are shown in Table S3.

3.4. Identification of the Hub Genes

The identification of hub genes in cancer is essential for elucidating the intricate molecular mechanisms that drive cancer development, progression, and responses to treatment. Hub genes serve as nodes within gene regulatory networks and signaling pathways implicated in cancer pathogenesis. The identification of hub genes plays a critical role in advancing our understanding of cancer biology. The STRING database was utilized to construct and analyze a PPI network, with the minimum correlation coefficient threshold set at 0.400. The top five hub genes of miR-196-5p in the PPI network were identified using the MCC algorithm implemented in CytoHubba. The identified hub genes include Homeobox A5 (HOXA5), Homeobox A7 (HOXA7), Homeobox B6 (HOXB6), Homeobox B7 (HOXB7), and PBX Homeobox 1 (PBX1) (Figure 3A). The top five hub genes of miR-196-3p were SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (SMURF1), cullin 1 (CUL1), exportin 1 (XPO1), cytochrome P450 family 26 subfamily B member 1 (CYP26B1), and short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family 9C member 7 (SDR9C7) (Figure 3B).

4. Discussion

Biomarkers represent a promising avenue for advancing personalized medicine and optimizing therapy tailored to individual patients, while concurrently facilitating the exploration of novel drug targets and the development of novel treatment strategies [34]. Diagnostic biomarkers play a crucial role in either detecting or confirming the presence of specific diseases or conditions [35]. In clinical applications, the effective utilization of miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers necessitates adherence to stringent criteria, notably high sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, an ideal biomarker for a specific cancer type should exhibit significant differential expression [36]. Ultimately, biomarkers hold the potential to elevate standards of patient care and drive precision medicine initiatives forward [37]. miRNA profiling has garnered considerable attention as a valuable tool for tumor classification, early detection, disease prognosis, and therapeutic decision making. However, despite notable advancements, the field of miRNA research encounters persistent technical hurdles. The costs associated with miRNA profiling are still high and serve as a barrier to adoption. However, the utilization of miRNAs as biomarkers offers several advantages, including their manageable dimensionality, ease of testing, and clinical significance in disease diagnosis [38]. Detection of a select few miRNAs provides deeper insights into tumor developmental lineage and differentiation compared to profiling numerous mRNAs [39].
Diagnostic biomarkers for tongue cancer include various molecular entities such as long intergenic non-coding RNA, miRNAs, and metabolites. These biomarkers show promise for the early detection and monitoring of oral cancer. In previous research, the miRNA expression profiles of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) were investigated [40,41]. Salivary LINC00657 and miRNA-106a have been identified as potential diagnostic markers for OSCC [42]. Additionally, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, L-pipecolic acid, and L-carnitine have been investigated as the signature diagnostic biomarkers for OSCC [43]. In this study, we identified 13 miRNAs that were differentially expressed in OSCC patients. The findings from this research demonstrate a notable upregulation in the expression of hsa-miR-31, hsa-miR-196a-1, hsa-miR-196b, hsa-miR-210, hsa-miR-301a, hsa-miR-450a-2, hsa-miR-503, hsa-miR-877, hsa-miR-937, hsa-miR-1293, hsa-miR-3648, and hsa-miR-4326 within tissue samples obtained from patients diagnosed with OSCC in comparison to control samples. Subsequently, through ROC analysis, we identified these selected miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers of OSCC. Among these, five miRNAs demonstrated an AUC value of 0.9 or higher, with miR-196b emerging as particularly noteworthy in terms of diagnostic significance. The expression levels of miR-196a-1 are known to be markedly upregulated in tissue and plasma samples derived from individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer compared with controls [44]. miR-450a-2 exhibited downregulation in both gastric cancer cells and tissue [45]. The downregulation of miR-503 leads to an inhibition in the progression in OSCC [46]. miR-877-3p targets vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), and the positive expression of VEGFA has been associated with a significantly poor prognosis In cases of OSCC [47]. miR-196b has been proposed as a potential biomarker for the management of oral cancer, and its overexpression has been associated with enhanced oral cancer cell migration, invasion, and lymph node metastasis [48]. Elevated expression levels of miR-196a and miR-196b have been observed in saliva samples from patients diagnosed with HNSCC. These findings highlight the potential of these miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for detecting HNSCC at an early stage [49]. Additionally, the combined determination of plasma miR-196a and miR-196b may be used as a diagnostic biomarker for the early detection of oral cancer [50].
Identifying target genes can aid in the development of personalized therapies based on genetic profiles. Predicted target genes of miR-196b were categorized based on their biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions using GO analysis. Furthermore, analysis of enriched KEGG pathways has been conducted to elucidate the involvement of target genes of miR-196b in oral cancer. The expression of axon guidance genes is related to clinical features like pain and nodal status in oral cancer [51]. Clinical studies have reported dysphagia in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, type 3, type 6, and type 7 [52]. Dysphagia in oral cancer is commonly attributed to extensive tissue destruction, limited excursion of the remaining tissue, and sensory paralysis of the tongue [53]. The MAPK signaling pathway plays a crucial role in OSCC, where it interacts extensively with miRNAs to regulate cellular processes involved in OSCC development and progression [54]. The Ras signaling pathway is intricately linked to the pathogenesis of OSCC and contributes to key oncogenic processes such as cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [55]. The role of mRNA surveillance pathways, notably the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cancer. Additionally, the NMD pathway functions as a post-transcriptional regulator [55]. Mitophagy is a cellular process that selectively degrades dysfunctional mitochondria through autophagy [56]. Targeting mitochondria may be a promising way to treat OSCC [57]. Protein digestion and absorption are associated with oral cancer due to their role in nutrient uptake and cellular metabolism [58]. The top five hub genes of miR-196b-5p were screened using the MCC algorithm. These genes include HOXA5, HOXA7, HOXB6, HOXB7, and PBX1. Altered expression patterns of homeobox-containing HOX genes have been implicated in oral cancer [59]. The expression of HOXA5 was upregulated in OSCC samples compared to non-tumor tissue and was associated with survival rates [60]. Expression of HOXA7 in OSCC exhibited a substantial increase at both the mRNA and protein levels [61]. H3OXB6 was hypermethylated in OSCC cell lines (SCC4 and SCC9) derived from a human HNSCC [62]. HOXB7 is implicated in abnormal proliferation in oral carcinogenesis [63]. Expression analysis demonstrated the expression of PBX1 mRNA and protein within OSCC cells [64]. The top five hub genes of miR-196b-3p were SMURF1, CUL1, XPO1, CYP26B1, and SDR9C7. While this study presents promising findings, it is important to acknowledge several limitations. Conducting a larger cohort study is essential to further validate these findings. Additionally, investigating the functional roles of miRNAs through in vitro and in vivo studies in future research would significantly deepen our understanding of their biological mechanisms and signaling pathways. Nevertheless, our findings reveal a significant upregulation of miR-196b in tissues from oral cancer patients, suggesting its potential utility as a diagnostic biomarker.

5. Conclusions

A current method of diagnosing and screening OSCC of the tongue is the scalpel biopsy, which is time consuming and requires considerable expertise. While advanced imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies have advanced significantly in recent decades, CT scans can only detect the presence of masses [65], thus underscoring the need for supplementary diagnostic tools. The differential expression patterns of miRNAs in cancerous tissue samples and adjacent nontumorous tissue samples serve as valuable biomarkers for diagnostic purposes [66]. In conclusion, this study elucidated a five-miRNA diagnostic model associated with patients diagnosed with OSCC of the tongue. Our findings highlighted the remarkable diagnostic potential of miR-196b. Additionally, five hub genes were selected among the target genes of miR-196b. Ensuring the stability and reproducibility of biomarkers is crucial for augmenting their clinical applicability. Further research will prioritize the standardization of biomarker measurement methodologies and validation of biomarker performance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb46070402/s1: Table S1: Prediction of target genes of differentially expressed miR-196b; Table S2: GO analysis of target genes of miR-196b; Table S3: KEGG enrichment analysis of target genes of miR-196b. Figure S1: Heatmap for the identification of differentially expressed miRNAs. Figure S2: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of 13 differentially expressed miRNAs in oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.

Author Contributions

Y.J. and Y.-N.P. performed the studies, prepared the figures, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; Y.J. and J.-K.R. designed the project and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

This study benefited from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liang, L.; Li, Y.; Ying, B.; Huang, X.; Liao, S.; Yang, J.; Liao, G. Mutation-associated transcripts reconstruct the prognostic features of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2023, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, S.; Li, K.; Zhao, T.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, T.; Wu, Y.; Ding, L.; Huang, X.; Celentano, A.; Yang, X.; et al. Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis from tissue metabolic profiling. Oral Dis. 2023, 30, 2158–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, G.; Xiao, Z.; Ren, J.; Xia, R.H.; Wu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Tao, X. Machine learning based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters helps predict mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor expression in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A pilot study. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2024, 137, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Luo, J.; Zhang, L.; Guo, L.; Yang, S. PKM2 regulates proliferation and apoptosis through the Hippo pathway in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2021, 21, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, Y.W.; Kang, W.P.; Hong, C.Q.; Huang, B.L.; Qiu, Z.H.; Liu, C.T.; Chu, L.Y.; Xu, Y.W.; Guo, F.C. Nutritional and immune-related indicators-based Nomogram for predicting overall survival of surgical oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tang, W.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Tao, X. Assessment of tumor depth in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma with multiparametric MRI: Correlation with pathology. Eur. Radiol. 2022, 32, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Almangush, A.; Heikkinen, I.A.; Mäkitie, A.; Coletta, R.D.; Läärä, E.; Leivo, I.; Salo, T. Prognostic biomarkers for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 117, 856–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Crosby, D.; Bhatia, S.; Brindle, K.M.; Coussens, L.M.; Dive, C.; Emberton, M.; Esener, S.; Fitzgerald, R.C.; Gambhir, S.S.; Kuhn, P.; et al. Early Detection of Cancer. Science 2022, 375, eaay9040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Myers, D.; Allen, E.; Essa, A.; Gbadamosi-Akindele, M. Rapidly Growing Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue. Cureus 2020, 12, e7164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. O’Brien, J.; Hayder, H.; Zayed, Y.; Peng, C. Overview of MicroRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hammond, S.M. An overview of microRNAs. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 87, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Naeli, P.; Winter, T.; Hackett, A.P.; Alboushi, L.; Jafarnejad, S.M. The intricate balance between microRNA-induced mRNA decay and translational repression. FEBS J. 2023, 290, 2508–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dillhoff, M.; Wojcik, S.E.; Bloomston, M. MicroRNAs in Solid Tumors. J. Surg. Res. 2009, 154, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, T.; Croce, C.M.; Bloomston, M. MicroRNA: Trends in clinical trials of cancer diagnosis and therapy strategies. Exp. Mol. Med. 2023, 55, 1314–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boichard, A.; Wagner, M.J.; Kurzrock, R. Angiosarcoma heterogeneity and potential therapeutic vulnerability to immune checkpoint blockade: Insights from genomic sequencing. Genome Med. 2020, 12, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, G.; Luo, D.; Zhong, N.; Li, D.; Zheng, J.; Liao, H.; Li, Z.; Lin, X.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, C.; et al. GPC2 Is a Potential Diagnostic, Immunological, and Prognostic Biomarker in Pan-Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 857308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sempere, L.F.; Azmi, A.S.; Moore, A. microRNA-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications in cancer medicine. Genome Med. 2021, 12, e1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Qin, L.X. An Integrative Analysis of microRNA and mRNA Expression—A Case Study. Cancer Inform. 2008, 6, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, Q.; Zheng, C.; Shen, H.; Zhou, Z.; Lei, Y. MicroRNAs-mRNAs Expression Profile and Their Potential Role in Malignant Transformation of Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells Induced by Cadmium. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 902025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zou, K.H.; O’Malley, A.J.; Mauri, L. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation 2007, 115, 654–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Walter, S. The partial area under the summary ROC curve. Stat. Med. 2005, 24, 2025–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mandrekar, J.N. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Diagnostic Test Assessment. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, 1315–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Çorbacıoğlu, S.K.; Aksel, G. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 2023, 23, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Unal, I. Defining an Optimal Cut-Point Value in ROC Analysis: An Alternative Approach. Comput. Math Methods Med. 2017, 2017, 3762651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jorge, A.L.; Pereira, E.R.; Oliveira, C.S.; Ferreira, E.D.S.; Menon, E.T.N.; Diniz, S.N.; Pezuk, J.A. MicroRNAs: Understanding their role in gene expression and cancer. Einstein 2021, 19, eRB5996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.J.; Yin, H.L.; Li, Y.; Hao, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, Q.L. The Construction and Analysis of a ceRNA Network Related to Salt-Sensitivity Hypertensives. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 8258351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Althubaiti, S.; Karwath, A.; Dallol, A.; Noor, A.; Alkhayyat, S.S.; Alwassia, R.; Mineta, K.; Gojobori, T.; Beggs, A.D.; Schofield, P.N.; et al. Ontology-based prediction of cancer driver genes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sherman, B.T.; Hao, M.; Qiu, J.; Jiao, X.; Baseler, M.W.; Lane, H.C.; Imamichi, T.; Chang, W. DAVID: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acid Res. 2022, 50, W216–W221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ruffalo, M.; Bar-Joseph, Z. Protein interaction disruption in cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Szklarczyk, D.; Kirsch, R.; Koutrouli, M.; Nastou, K.; Mehryary, F.; Hachilif, R.; Gable, A.L.; Fang, T.; Doncheva, N.T.; Pyysalo, S.; et al. The STRING database in 2023: Protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D638–D646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kalia, M. Feature selection with the Fisher score followed by the Maximal Clique Centrality algorithm can accurately identify the hub genes of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17283. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ding, W.; Xin, J.; Jiang, L.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, T.; Shi, D.; Lin, B.; Li, L.; Li, J. Characterisation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell microRNA in hepatitis B-related acute-on-chronic liver failure. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kalia, M. Biomarkers for personalized oncology: Recent advances and future challenges. Metabolism 2015, 64, S16–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Califf, R.M. Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 243, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Condrat, C.E.; Thompson, D.C.; Barbu, M.G.; Bugnar, O.L.; Boboc, A.; Cretoiu, D.; Suciu, N.; Cretoiu, S.M.; Voinea, S.C. miRNAs as Biomarkers in Disease: Latest Findings Regarding Their Role in Diagnosis and Prognosis. Cells 2020, 9, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hartl, D.; de Luca, V.D.; Kostikova, A.; Laramin, J.; Kennedy, S.; Ferrero, E.; Siegel, R.; Fink, M.; Ahmed, S.; Millholland, J.; et al. Translational precision medicine: An industry perspective. J. Transl. Med. 2021, 19, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lussier, Y.A.; Stadler, W.M.; Chen, J.L. Advantages of genomic complexity: Bioinformatics opportunities in microrna cancer signatures. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2012, 19, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Sen, S. MicroRNA as Biomarkers and Diagnostics. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016, 231, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Soga, D.; Yoshiba, S.; Shiogama, S.; Miyazaki, H.; Kondo, S.; Shintani, S. microRNA expression profiles in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 30, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gombos, K.; Horváth, R.; Szele, E.; Juhász, K.; Gocze, K.; Somlai, K.; Pajkos, G.; Ember, I.; Olasz, L. miRNA expression profiles of oral squamous cell carcinomas. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 1511–1517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Tarrad, N.A.F.; Hassan, S.; Shaker, O.G.; AbdelKawy, M. “Salivary LINC00657 and miRNA-106a as diagnostic biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma, an observational diagnostic study”. BMC Oral Health 2023, 23, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Vimal, J.; George, N.A.; Kumar, R.R.; Kattoor, J.; Kannan, S. Identification of salivary metabolic biomarker signatures for oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Arch. Oral Biol. 2023, 155, 105780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mehrjoei, B.; Haghnazari, L.; Bashiri, H.; Rezvani, N. The diagnostic potential of miR-196a-1 in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2024, 24, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Raei, N.; Safaralizadeh, R.; Hesseinpourfeizi, M.; Yazdanbod, A.; Pourfarzi, F.; Latifi-Navid, S. Crosstalk between lncRNAs and miRNAs in gastrointestinal cancer drug resistance. Life Sci. 2021, 284, 119933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Han, L.; Cheng, J.; Li, A. hsa_circ_0072387 Suppresses Proliferation, Metastasis, and Glycolysis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells by Downregulating miR-503-5p. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2021, 36, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shao, Y.; Song, Y.; Xu, S.; Li, S.; Zhou, H. Expression Profile of Circular RNAs in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 533616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rajan, C.; Roshan, V.G.D.; Khan, I.; Manasa, V.G.; Himal, I.; Kattoor, J.; Thomas, S.; Kondaiah, P.; Kannan, S. MiRNA expression profiling and emergence of new prognostic signature for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Álvarez-Teijeiro, S.; Menéndez, S.T.; Villaronga, M.; Rodrigo, J.P.; Manterola, L.; de Villalaín, L.; de Vicente, J.C.; Alonso-Durán, L.; Fernández, M.P.; Lawrie, C.H.; et al. Dysregulation of Mir-196b in Head and Neck Cancers Leads to Pleiotropic Effects in the Tumor Cells and Surrounding Stromal Fibroblasts. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lu, Y.C.; Chang, J.T.C.; Huang, Y.C.; Huang, C.C.; Chen, W.H.; Lee, L.Y.; Huang, B.S.; Chen, Y.J.; Li, H.F.; Cheng, A.J. Combined determination of circulating miR-196a and miR-196b levels produces high sensitivity and specificity for early detection of oral cancer. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 48, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bhattacharya, A.; Janal, M.N.; Veeramachaneni, R.; Dolgalev, I.; Dubeykovskaya, Z.; Tu, N.H.; Kim, H.; Zhang, S.; Wu, A.K.; Hagiwara, M.; et al. Oncogenes overexpressed in metastatic oral cancers from patients with pain: Potential pain mediators released in exosomes. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rub, U.; Brunt, E.R.; Petrasch-Parwez, E.; Schols, L.; Theegarten, D.; Auburger, G.; Seidel, K.; Schultz, C.; Gierga, K.; Paulson, H.; et al. Degeneration of ingestion-related brainstem nuclei in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2, 3, 6 and 7. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2006, 32, 635–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Son, Y.R.; Choi, K.H.; Kim, T.G. Dysphagia in Tongue Cancer Patients. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2015, 39, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cheng, Y.; Chen, J.; Shi, Y.; Fang, X.; Tang, Z. MAPK Signaling Pathway in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Biological Function and Targeted Therapy. Cancers 2022, 14, 4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bongiorno, R.; Colombo, M.P.; Lecis, D. Deciphering the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway to identify cancer cell vulnerabilities for effective cancer therapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 40, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Youle, R.J.; Narendra, D.P. Mechanisms of mitophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bai, J.; Wu, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Shang, Z.; Jiang, E.; Shao, Z. Roles of mitochondria in oral squamous cell carcinoma therapy: Friend or foe? Cancers 2022, 14, 5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rodríguez-Molinero, J.; Migueláñez-Medrán, B.D.C.; Puente-Gutiérrez, C.; Delgado-Somolinos, E.; Martín Carreras-Presas, C.; Fernández-Farhall, J.; López-Sánchez, A.F. Association between Oral Cancer and Diet: An Update. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Padam, K.S.R.; Morgan, R.; Hunter, K.; Chakrabarty, S.; Kumar, N.A.N.; Radhakrishnan, R. Identification of HOX signatures contributing to oral cancer phenotype. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rodini, C.O.; Xavier, F.C.; Paiva, K.B.; De Souza Setúbal Destro, M.F.; Moyses, R.A.; Michaluarte, P.; Carvalho, M.B.; Fukuyama, E.E.; Head and Neck Genome Project Gencapo; Tajara, E.H.; et al. Head and Neck Genome Project Gencapo. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 40, 1180–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Duan, X.; Chen, H.; Ma, H.; Song, Y. The expression and significance of the HOXA7 gene in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oral Sci. 2017, 59, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Xavier, F.C.; Destro, M.F.; Duarte, C.M.; Nunes, F.D. Epigenetic repression of HOXB cluster in oral cancer cell lines. Arch. Oral Biol. 2014, 59, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Marcinkiewicz, K.M.; Gudas, L.J. Altered epigenetic regulation of homeobox genes in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 320, 128–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Platais, C.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Ebensberger, S.N.; Morgan, R.; Lambert, D.W.; Hunter, K.D. Targeting HOX-PBX interactions causes death in oral potentially malignant and squamous carcinoma cells but not normal oral keratinocytes. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, Q.; Gao, P.; Wang, X.; Duan, Y. The early diagnosis and monitoring of squamous cell carcinoma via saliva metabolomics. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hu, Y.; Dingerdissen, H.; Gupta, S.; Kahsay, R.; Shanker, V.; Wan, Q.; Yan, C.; Mazumder, R. Identification of key differentially expressed MicroRNAs in cancer patients through pan-cancer analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 2018, 103, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Relative expression levels of 13 differentially expressed miRNAs in oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue tissue and non-tumor tissue. (A) miR-31; (B) miR-196a-1; (C) miR-196b; (D) miR-210; (E) miR-301a; (F) miR-450a-2; (G) miR-503; (H) miR-877; (I) miR-937; (J) miR-1269; (K) miR-1293; (L) miR-3648; (M) miR-4326. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Relative expression levels of 13 differentially expressed miRNAs in oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue tissue and non-tumor tissue. (A) miR-31; (B) miR-196a-1; (C) miR-196b; (D) miR-210; (E) miR-301a; (F) miR-450a-2; (G) miR-503; (H) miR-877; (I) miR-937; (J) miR-1269; (K) miR-1293; (L) miR-3648; (M) miR-4326. *** p < 0.001.
Cimb 46 00402 g001
Figure 2. Volcano plot for the identification of differentially expressed miRNAs. A volcano plot was used to indicate the log2 fold change in 13 differentially expressed miRNAs. Differentially expressed miRNAs are ranked based on fold change and p-value. Adjustment for multiple testing was performed using Bonferroni correction, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.01.
Figure 2. Volcano plot for the identification of differentially expressed miRNAs. A volcano plot was used to indicate the log2 fold change in 13 differentially expressed miRNAs. Differentially expressed miRNAs are ranked based on fold change and p-value. Adjustment for multiple testing was performed using Bonferroni correction, with a significance threshold set at p < 0.01.
Cimb 46 00402 g002
Figure 3. A protein–protein interaction network of the top five hub genes. (A) The top five hub genes of miR-196b-5p. (B) The top five hub genes of miR-196b-3p.
Figure 3. A protein–protein interaction network of the top five hub genes. (A) The top five hub genes of miR-196b-5p. (B) The top five hub genes of miR-196b-3p.
Cimb 46 00402 g003
Table 1. Clinical data of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue from The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Table 1. Clinical data of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue from The Cancer Genome Atlas.
CharacteristicOverall
Gender, n (%)
Male82 (64.1)
Female46 (35.9)
Age (years)
Mean ± SD58.17 ± 13.27
NA1
Pathologic stage, n (%)
Stage I15 (11.72)
Stage II22 (17.19)
Stage III30 (23.44)
Stage IV51 (39.84)
Not Available10 (7.81)
Pathological, T, n (%)
T122 (17.19)
T245 (35.16)
T334 (26.56)
T419 (14.84)
TX6 (4.69)
Not Available2 (1.56)
Pathological, N, n (%)
N053 (41.41)
N118 (14.06)
N244 (34.38)
NX11 (8.59)
Not Available2 (1.56)
Pathological, M, n (%)
M043 (33.59)
MX13 (10.16)
Not Available72 (56.25)
Data are expressed as either frequency with percentages or means ± standard deviations; T: tumor; N: node; M: metastasis.
Table 2. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve and diagnostic values of five differentially expressed miRNAs.
Table 2. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve and diagnostic values of five differentially expressed miRNAs.
miRNAsAUC95% CICutoffSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)p-Value
miR-196a-10.94470.8991–0.9903<2.31984.6292.97<0.0001
miR-196b0.98380.9661–1.001<11.4792.3195.31<0.0001
miR-450a-20.93030.8588–1.002<1.28484.6293.75<0.0001
miR-5030.95490.9153–0.9946<2.2684.6293.75<0.0001
miR-8770.92850.8791–0.9779<0.855284.6283.59<0.0001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, Y.-N.; Ryu, J.-K.; Ju, Y. The Potential MicroRNA Diagnostic Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 6746-6756. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46070402

AMA Style

Park Y-N, Ryu J-K, Ju Y. The Potential MicroRNA Diagnostic Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2024; 46(7):6746-6756. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46070402

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Young-Nam, Jae-Ki Ryu, and Yeongdon Ju. 2024. "The Potential MicroRNA Diagnostic Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46, no. 7: 6746-6756. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46070402

APA Style

Park, Y. -N., Ryu, J. -K., & Ju, Y. (2024). The Potential MicroRNA Diagnostic Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46(7), 6746-6756. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46070402

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop