Next Article in Journal
Marine Biocompounds for Neuroprotection—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Ameliorative Effects of Peptides from the Oyster (Crassostrea hongkongensis) Protein Hydrolysates against UVB-Induced Skin Photodamage in Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Extracts and Marine Algae Polysaccharides in Therapy and Prevention of Inflammatory Diseases of the Intestine

by
Natalya N. Besednova
1,
Tatyana S. Zaporozhets
1,*,
Tatyana A. Kuznetsova
1,
Ilona D. Makarenkova
1,
Sergey P. Kryzhanovsky
2,
Lydmila N. Fedyanina
2 and
Svetlana P. Ermakova
3
1
Somov Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Vladivostok 690087, Russia
2
School of Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok 690087, Russia
3
G.B. Elyakov Pacific Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, FEB RAS, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2020, 18(6), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/md18060289
Submission received: 28 April 2020 / Revised: 27 May 2020 / Accepted: 27 May 2020 / Published: 31 May 2020

Abstract

:
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a serious public health problem worldwide. Current therapeutic strategies that use anti-inflammatory drugs, immunosuppressants, and biological treatments are often ineffective and have adverse health effects. In this regard, the use of natural compounds aimed at key pathogenic therapeutic targets in IBD attracts universal attention. Seaweed is a valuable source of structurally diverse biologically active compounds. The materials presented in the review indicate that seaweed extracts and polysaccharides are effective candidates for the development of drugs, biological food additives, and functional nutrition products for the treatment and prevention of IBD. The structural features of algal polysaccharides provide the possibility of exposure to therapeutic targets of IBD, including proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, nuclear factor NF-kB, intestinal epithelial cells, reactive oxygen and nitrogen. Further study of the relationship between the effect of polysaccharides from different types of algae, with different structure and molecular weights on immune and epithelial cells, intestinal microorganisms will contribute to a deeper understanding of their mechanisms and will help in the development of drugs, dietary supplements, functional foods for the treatment of patients with IBD.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of idiopathic chronic inflammatory intestinal conditions. The two main disease categories are Crohn’s disease (CrD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), which occupy one of the leading positions of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract due to the severity, frequency of complications and mortality [1,2]. Late diagnosis and inadequate treatment lead to the development of complications, including the occurrence of malignant growth, as well as disabled people of working age and death. Since the middle of the 20th century, the incidence of IBD has been increasing everywhere, is on average 4.1 per 100,000 population for UC and 0.8 per 100,000 population for CrD [2,3,4,5,6]. The prevalence of IBD has also increased significantly, turning these diseases into a public health problem worldwide [7].
The etiology of IBD is still unknown, despite a long history of study. From a modern perspective, the pathogenesis of IBD is considered as the interaction of several factors Advances in gene sequencing technology have identified more than 160 susceptibility genes associated with IBD, but these genes are not the main reason for the increase in the number of diseases [8,9]. The rapid rise of IBD incidence in certain geographic regions suggests that disturbance of the immune system and/or imbalanced interactions with microbes leads to the development of chronic intestinal inflammation when certain environmental factors, including exposure to drugs (such as antibiotics), viruses, psychological stress, air pollutants, diet, and chemicals contribute to trigger genetically susceptible hosts [10,11,12].
Immunological dysregulation in IBD is characterized by dysfunction of the effector and regulatory cells of innate acquired immunity, which leads to the uncontrolled release of soluble inflammatory mediators with the subsequent development of pathological changes [13,14]. T cells are activated in both diseases, but the level of differentiation and activation of T-cell immunity is different in CrD and UC. CrD is usually designated as a Th1 and Th17 condition with elevated production of IL-12, IL-23, IFN-γ, and IL-17, whereas UC is usually characterized as a Th2 condition with increased production of IL-13, IL-5, and IL-9 [13,15,16]. It is also well documented that downregulation of IL-10 promotes disease progression in patients with IBD [15,17]. On the other hand, a lot of new information accumulated on a defective innate immunity as the primary mechanism involved with the development of IBD [18]. Innate immunity provides an answer through recognition of pathogen-associated molecular structures (PAMP), which include Nod-like-receptor (NLRs), mannose receptors, scavenger-receptor and Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Abnormal regulation of these signaling pathways during both the early and chronic phases of intestinal inflammation may result in a persistent inflammatory process, which may underlie the pathogenesis of IBD [19]. Finally, the development of new molecular genetic tools made it possible to study in more detail the key mechanisms of the effect of microbiota on the intestines in IBD [20,21].
According to the current recommendations, anti-inflammatory drugs (5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives, corticosteroids) and immunosuppressants (thiopurines, antimetabolites, calcineurin inhibitors), biological drugs (anticytokine drugs, adhesion molecule antagonists, antibiotics) can be used for the treatment of IBD [22], surgical procedures to repair or remove affected areas of the gastrointestinal tract, as well as non-pharmacological alternative methods, can be used to treat IBD [23]. However, their use is often not safe for the body and is associated with side effects. Aminosalicylates cause headaches and nausea. Corticosteroids can lead to the development of osteoporosis, hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes, exacerbation of gastrointestinal ulcers. Anti-TNFα drugs can cause allergic and anaphylactoid reactions, infectious complications, cardiological symptoms, skin lesions. Moreover, TNF inhibitors are not useful for one-third of all patients (i.e., <primary failures>), and a further one third lose effect over time (<secondary failures>) [24].
Given the serious side effects associated with conventional treatment, the search for new sources of drugs to improve the clinical symptoms of IBD remains essential. Recent advances in the study of IBD pathogenesis have opened up prospects for the development of new treatment strategies aimed at therapeutic targets and associated with the use of areactogenic and effective natural compounds that can block the adhesion and migration of leukocytes into the inflamed intestinal mucosa and inhibit cytokines, normalize the intestinal microflora, maintain clinical remission and accelerate mucous healing intestinal membrane [25,26].
In this regard, marine algae represent a huge bioresource of natural ingredients [27,28]. Recently, studies have been actively developed related to the possibility of using complex glycans (polysaccharides) as therapeutic agents [29,30,31,32]. A wide range of biological activity of polysaccharides―immunomodulating, antitumor, antiviral, antioxidant, lipid-lowering―is closely related to their monosaccharide composition, molecular weights, types of bonds and chain conformation [33] and is reflected in the reports of both preclinical and clinical trials [33,34]. A large number of experimental data indicates that algal polysaccharides, as well as algae extracts, have an anti-inflammatory and gastroprotective effect and are very promising for the treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal diseases [35,36,37,38,39]. Algae polysaccharides are resistant to the action of gastric juice, the digestive enzymes of the host, are not absorbed in the upper sections of the gastrointestinal tract, and can serve as fermentation substrates for specific intestinal microbial populations [40,41]. Marine polysaccharides also have great potential for drug delivery systems [30].
This work includes a review of current ideas about the possibility of using extracts and polysaccharides of seaweed as the basis for drugs, dietary supplements and functional food products for the prevention and treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

2. Algae Polysaccharides

2.1. Brown Algae Polysaccharides

Brown seaweed is a large group of multicellular photoautotrophic organisms. Alginates and fucoidans are two of the best-known seaweed biopolymers and have experimentally and clinically proven pharmacological effects, such as hypolipidemic, hypoglycemic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, metal-binding, and immunomodulating [32,35,37,42,43,44].
Fucoidans are complex highly sulfated, usually branched polysaccharides in the range from several tens to several thousand kDa, often containing, in addition to fucose residues, glucose, galactose, xylose, mannose and uronic acids, as well as acetyl groups [44,45]. Fucoidans are present mainly in the matrix of the cell wall of various types of brown algae and also perform important structural and protective [45,46]. The potential application of fucoidan in pharmaceutical technology is also due to its ionic nature. The negative charge of the molecule results from the presence of sulfate residues in the C-2 and C-4 positions, occasionally in C-3, allowing the formation of complexes with other oppositely charged molecules [47]. Fucoidan has a low-toxicity, is biodegradable [30] and is a biocompatible compound approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) category as a food ingredient [47]. Fucoidans might exhibit antioxidant [43], anticoagulant [48], antibacterial, antifungal [49], anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory [50] activity.
Alginic acids are found in all brown seaweeds (Phaeophyceae) in a proportion of 18% to 40% of the total plant mass [46]. These anionic polysaccharides belong to the family of linear copolymers and consist of residues of β-d-mannuronic and α-l-guluronic acids [51]. Alginates (water-soluble salts of alginic acid) are biocompatible, non-toxic, non-immunogenic and biodegradable [46]. The alginates are known to form a physical gel by hydrogen bonding at low pH (acid gel) and by ionic interactions with divalent or trivalent ions, which act as crosslinkers between adjacent polymer chains [46]. Alginate hydrogels are widely used as biomaterials [52]. Alginic acid also plays an important role as fiber for maintaining the health of animals and humans [27].
Laminarans are low molecular weight (5–10 kDa) β-d-glucans which consist of β-(1→3)-linked d-glucose residues. They differ from each other with regard to their length and branching structure [53,54]. The content of laminaran in some types of brown algae is from 10% to 35% of the dry weight [32]. Laminarans possess diverse biological properties—antioxidant, antitumor, antimicrobial, immunomodulating, prebiotic and anticoagulant [55,56,57].

2.2. Red Algae Polysaccharides

The main structural component of red algae is sulfated polysaccharides (galactans)—carrageenans, agars, porphyrin, xylan—which have no analogs among other plant polysaccharides. The structural features of these polysaccharides are determined by the species affiliation of algae, their habitat conditions and determine a wide range of biological activity [32].
Carrageenans are a family of sulfated hydrocolloids whose polymer chain is built from galactose residues and its derivatives with alternating α-(1-3) and β-(1-4) bonds. Carrageenans are classified by location and the amount of sulfate groups in the monosaccharide residues and the presence of 3,6-angirogalactose in 4-O-substituted residues and are divided into carrageenans kappa (k), iota (i) and lambda (λ) [32,58]. Carrageenans are the most studied among algae polysaccharides in terms of toxicity, pyrogenicity and allergenicity and food safety and medical use [59,60]. Carrageenans have immunomodulating, antioxidant, antitoxic, antiviral, antitumor and anticoagulant properties [61]. Recently, the utility of carrageenans as gelling- or viscosity-enhancing agents for controlled drug release systems [60]. However, taking into account three differences in the properties of the most important types of carrageenans (κ, τ, λ), the safety assessment should be very thorough.

2.3. Green Alga Polysaccharides

Ulvan is the major water-soluble polysaccharide found in green seaweed of the order Ulvales (Ulva and Enteromorpha sp.) that has sulfate, rhamnose, xylose, iduronic and glucuronic acids as the main constituents [58,62]. The structure of the disaccharide moieties of ulvans resembles that of glycosaminoglycans, which occur in the extracellular matrix of connective tissues of animals [32]. Ulvan and its oligosaccharides have various biological effects, such as anticoagulant, antiviral, antiallergic, antitumor, anti-inflammatory etc. [62].

3. Experimental Models of IBD

Success in understanding the intestinal inflammation that occurs with inflammatory bowel disease has been achieved through the development of mouse models of intestinal inflammation [63]. There are two main approaches to modeling UC and CrD [64]. The first of these consists in obtaining spontaneously developing diseases in mice with a certain genotype or as a result of exposure to the genome (knockout or transgenic mice), which is associated with a loss of immune tolerance to autogenic intestinal microflora. The second approach is to simulate chemically induced colitis. For this, trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS), sodium dextran sulfate (DSS), oxazolone (4-ethoxymethylene-2-phenyl-2-oxazolin-5) and others are used. TNBS elicits a Th-1-dependent immune response and oxazolone-Th-2 phenotype. Intrarectal administration of the TNBS renders colonic proteins immunogenic to the host immune system and thereby initiates a mucosal immune response that drives colitis in susceptible mouse strains [65]. Administration of oxazolone elicits colonic inflammation that differs markedly from that caused by TNBS and that resembles many features of ulcerative colitis rather than CrD [66].
As some of these characteristics resemble features of CrD, TNBS colitis has been widely used in the study of immunologic aspects relevant to this disease, including cytokine secretion patterns, mechanisms of oral tolerance, and effects of potential immunotherapies. However, experimental colitis in mice is most often modeled using DSS, which mice receive with drinking water. This model is popular due to the ease of reproduction and the speed of obtaining the effect, depending on the time of exposure and dose [67]. In this case, mice with DSS-induced colitis exhibit phenotypic characteristics similar to acute and chronic colitis in humans (rectal bleeding, weight loss, diarrhea, ulceration of the submucous membrane, violation of the structure of crypt cells, penetration of a large number of cells into the colon mucosa). Macroscopic and histopathological changes are associated with excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [68]. Importantly, this inflammation develops in the absence of T cells mediating adaptive immunity, that effector cytokines produced by innate cells are sufficient to cause the inflammation. On this basis, DSS colitis has become a useful model for the study of the innate immune mechanisms involved in the development of intestinal inflammation [64].
In vitro cell culture models provide a useful tool for studying IBD. Immortalized cell lines of animal and human origin, including IEC Caco-2, IPEC-1, and IPEC-J2, are used to study the effects of drugs and food elements on the barrier function of intestinal epithelium, paracellular permeability, cytokine production and mucosal immune response in IBD [69,70]. The advantages of using IPEC-J2 as an in vitro model of the GI tract are the high resemblance between humans and pigs, and the ease of extrapolating in vitro to in vivo characteristics [69]. Human Caco-2 cells originally isolated from a human colon adenocarcinoma, after 18–21 days of culture become a homogenously polarized monolayer of enterocyte-like cells with apical and basolateral membranes, a brush border with microvilli and TJ [71]. Caco-2 cells express TLR and produce various cytokines [72], which allows them to be used to evaluate substances with both immunomodulating properties and the ability to protect damaged intestinal epithelium [73,74,75]. The cell transfer model used with great effect to define the role of regulatory cells in intestinal inflammation and establish the fact that mucosal homeostasis depends on a balance between mucosal proinflammatory effector function and anti-inflammatory regulatory function [76].

4. Therapeutic Targets for Algae Polysaccharides in IBD

4.1. Targeting Pro-inflammatory Pathways

4.1.1. Pro-inflammatory Cytokines

It has now been clearly established that cytokine responses are key elements that control the inflammatory mechanisms that underlie IBD [13,16,25,77]. Cytokines not only drive intestinal inflammation and diarrhea in IBD but may also regulate extra-intestinal disease manifestations (for example, arthralgia or arthritis) and systemic effects. Furthermore, cytokines seem to have a crucial role in driving complications of IBD such as intestinal stenosis, fistula formation and colitis-associated neoplasias [77]. Studies using tissue from patients with IBD and animal models of IBD have identified cytokine spectrum as potential new targets for the therapy of intestinal inflammation [76]. Such targets include IL-17, the main pathogenetic factor IBD, which stimulates a strong chronic immune-inflammatory response [78], pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-12, IL-23 and IL-21, as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL -10 and TGF-β [16,77]. Theoretically, potential strategies would include the blockade of Th17 cell differentiation and expansion, the neutralization of the cytokines produced by these cells, and the inhibition of the specific transcription factors required for Th17 cell function [79,80,81]. The key role of cytokines is also highlighted by the fact that blockade of TNF is now commonly used as a standard therapy for IBD in the clinic [82].
Brown algae polysaccharides are promising candidates as a therapeutic alternative for patients with IBD due to the fact that these compounds modulate many pro-inflammatory mechanisms and mediators including regulation of gene expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines related to ulcerative colitis [32,42,50,83,84].
Matsumoto et al. [85] examined the preventative of various types of fucoidans on the production of IL-6 in the line of colon epithelial cells CMT-93 stimulated by lipopolysaccharides in vitro and in vivo effect on chronic colitis of mice induced by sodium dextran. Fucoidans from Cladosiphon okamuranus Tokida and Kjellmaniella crassifolia have been shown to inhibit IL-6 production in CMT-93 cells and decrease NF-kB nuclear translocation. Fucoidan from Cladosiphon okamuranus also inhibited the synthesis of IFNγ and IL-6 and increased the synthesis of IL-10 and TGF-β in the colon lamina propria reduced the expression level of IL-6 mRNA in mouse epithelial cells compared to mice fed a standard diet. Disease activity index and myeloperoxidase activity also decreased in mice treated with Cladosiphon okamuranus fucoidan. Ryan et al. [86] showed that β-glucan obtained from Laminaria hyperborea and Laminaria digitata can both significantly decrease the expression of Th17-associated cytokines (IL-17a, IL-17F, and IL-22) as well as receptor IL-23R and IL-6, with no alteration to the T regulatory cell (TREG)–related targets.
O’Shea et al. [87] studied the impact of prior consumption of laminaran and/or and fucoidan on pathology and inflammation following DSS challenge in pigs. The findings of this study show that prior exposure to diets containing and fucoidan and a combination of and fucoidan and laminaran together, ameliorated weight loss, diarrhea, but failed to improve the pathology score associated with a DSS challenge in the proximal colon of pigs. Pigs receiving both LAM and/or FUC prior to the onset of a DSS challenge had decreased IL-6 mRNA abundance.
Lean et al. [83] evaluated the therapeutic potential of fucoidan-polyphenol complex (Maritech® Synergy, which is a highly characterized, certified organic complex of fucoidan and marine polyphenols, sourced from wild Fucus vesiculosus seaweed) and depyrogenated fucoidan in DSS mouse model of acute colitis and depyrogenated fucoidan in DSS mouse model of acute colitis. Orally administered polysaccharides significantly ameliorated symptoms of colitis based on retention of body weight, as well as reduced diarrhea and fecal blood loss, compared to the untreated colitis group. Colon and spleen weight in mice treated with oral fucoidan was also significantly lower, indicating reduced inflammation and edema. The macroscopic changes induced by oral fucoidan correlated significantly with substantially decreased production of inflammatory cytokines by the colon tissue. It is noteworthy that deterioration in the condition of animals and an increase in the level of certain pro-inflammatory cytokines in the colon tissue was noted with intraperitoneal administration of depyrogenized fucoidan. The authors propose the oral use of fucoidan as an effective and well-tolerated maintenance therapy for a long period of time to reduce inflammation and maintain the integrity of the intestinal epithelium.
Tanoue et al. [73] in an in vitro model for co-culture of intestinal epithelial cells of Caco-2 and macrophage cells RAW264.7 have established that fucoidan inhibits the expression of the IL-8 gene in epithelial cells by reducing the production of TNF-α by macrophages stimulated by lipopolysaccharide.
The authors of these publications suggest that algae polysaccharides could, therefore, represent a novel nutraceutical option for the management of IBD and suggest using them as an effective and well-tolerated maintenance therapy for a long period of time to reduce inflammation and maintain the integrity of the intestinal epithelium.
Treatment with the methanolic extract significantly attenuates body weight loss and severe clinical symptoms in mice with experimental colitis induced by DSS. This was associated with a remarkable amelioration of colonic architecture and a significant reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokine production in the intestinal tissue. The authors attribute this effect to the ability of the extract to reduce the rate of migration of lymphoid cells into the focus of inflammation and directly inhibit the secretion of cytokines by immunocytes [88,89].
The authors also believe that these effects on clinical symptoms and on histological parameters could be due to the presence of antioxidant compounds, such as β-carotene and α-tocopherol that have been isolated from Caulerpa mexicana [90] and inhibition of the formation of free radicals and the suppression of oxidative stress can be one of the important factors causing a decrease in the intensity of damage to the intestinal epithelium [91].
The efficacy of oral administration of an ethanol extract of the red alga Eucheuma cottonii with a high content of polysaccharides in experimental colitis is described by Sudirman et al. [5]. Extract administration protected against weight loss and decreased the colon weight per length ratio. The intestinal mucosa of the control mice was thickened and eroded, while the mucus morphology was preserved in the animals treated with the extract. The level of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6) in the blood serum, as well as IL-1β in the colon tissue of mice with colitis receiving algae extract, was lower than that of control animals (pronounced manifestations of colitis). The level of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6) in the blood serum, as well as IL-1β in the colon tissue of mice with colitis receiving algae extract, was lower than that in control animals, and the level of anti-inflammatory interleukin IL-10 was higher.

4.1.2. Intercellular Adhesion Molecules

Lymphocyte-endothelial interactions mediated by adhesion molecules, such as selectins, integrins, cadherins, etc., play an important role in the migration and involvement of leukocytes in places of inflammation and can also be used as potential therapeutic targets for chronic intestinal inflammation [92]. Selectins that bind to the mannose and fucose terminal residues of polysaccharides and glycoconjugates slow rolling of leukocytes and platelets to the surface of the endothelium of the vessel walls, facilitating transendothelial transmission [93]. The spatial pattern of sulfated saccharide structures of fucoidan, that imitates the clustering of sulfated, sialylated, and fucosylated oligosaccharides on the cell surface, provides binding to L- or P-selectins [94]. The interaction between fucoidan and selectins has physiological consequences that may be therapeutically beneficial. So, Semenov et al. [95] observed a significant suppression of the release of neutrophils into the abdominal cavity upon intravenous administration of fucoidan for 15 min–1.5 h after intraperitoneal administration of peptone to rats with experimental peritonitis. According to the authors, the blockade of inflammation at an early stage of its development occurs due to the interaction of fucoidan with P-selectin.
Zhang et al. [96] also found that intravenous administration of fucoidan reduced colonic mucosal damage and crypt destruction of dextran sodium sulfate-induced murine chronic colitis by reducing abolishing venular leukocyte rolling and extravascular recruitment. Most likely, fucoidan is acting like heparin or heparan sulfate (HS), presenting a spatial pattern of sulfated saccharide structures that imitates the clustering of sulfated, sialylated, and fucosylated oligosaccharides on the cell surface. Fucoidan is also able to block β2-integrin-dependent adhesion of leukocytes on intestinal epithelial cells by binding to CD11b/CD18 [97].
These results prove that sulfated polysaccharides, possessing the properties of glycosaminoglycan mimetics, block adhesion molecules and inhibit the migration of leukocytes, having a positive effect in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases

4.1.3. Active Oxygen and Nitrogen Species

The data accumulated to date show that oxidative stress plays a significant role in the pathogenesis and progression of IBD, being a potential pathogenic and critical factor in the occurrence, progression, and severity of the disease, and not a consequence of chronic inflammation of the intestinal mucosa [98,99]. Several literature reports have shown an increase of active forms of oxygen and nitrogen in patients with IBD [99,100] as well as in models of mouse colitis [101]. Defective antioxidant protection is another key factor contributing to the progression of IBD [99]. In this regard, potential therapeutic strategies for IBD aimed at signaling oxidative stress and involving the use of natural and synthetic antioxidant compounds are reviewed and discussed. Polysaccharides and algae extracts have pronounced antioxidant properties [38,44,102,103,104,105] and are potential therapeutic substances that target oxidative stress in IBD. However, further studies are needed to confirm the exact effects of these promising drugs and the suitable doses and administration routes.

4.2. Other Therapies

4.2.1. Intestinal Epithelial Cells (IEC)

An important role in the pathogenesis of IBD is given to reducing the effectiveness of the epithelial barrier. The epithelial barrier consists of several important elements, including the intact epithelial monolayer and the locking intercellular contacts (tight junctions, TJ) in which the membranes of neighboring cells are maximally brought together and are “cross-linked” by specialized proteins claudins and occludins [105]. A large body of evidence suggests that the disruption of the ECCs, TJ abnormalities and increased paracellular permeability contributes to excessive antigenic stimulation, which leads to the development of an immune-mediated inflammatory response in the intestinal wall and, ultimately, to IBD [105,106,107,108]. In this regard, the restoration of intestinal barrier function might be effective in preventing disease in at-risk individuals or maintaining remission in patients with IBD [109].
Iraha et al. [110] showed that fucoidan prevented H2O2-induced destruction of intestinal epithelial barrier function in a dose-dependent manner significantly increased transepithelial resistance, which indicates a direct increase in the barrier function of the intestinal epithelium and prevented a violation of paracellular permeability, increasing the expression of claudin-1. The authors suggest that fucoidan, which increases the epithelial protective function and promotes epithelial regeneration, might serve as an appropriate therapy for the treatment of IBD.
Yang et al. [111] investigated the potential anti-inflammatory and protective properties of intestinal permeability of an aqueous extract of Laminaria japonica and three types of fermented aqueous extracts of L. japonica in LPS-stimulated Caco-2 cells. All four extracts enhanced intestinal barrier function, preventing inhibition of tight junction-related protein levels, decreased monolayer permeability, and significantly reduced nitric oxide and IL-6 production.
A significant increase in the intestinal epithelial barrier and the immune function of cells when using low-molecular-weight fucoidan and high-stability fucoxanthin was shown in the same model [112].
Thus, the above examples show that algae polysaccharides can affect intestinal health by decreasing intestinal inflammation and enhancing barrier function by partially regulating dense compounds and associated proteins (claudine, occludine). Further studies of more TJ-linked proteins will establish the exact mechanism of action of polysaccharides and confirm their potential benefit as a suitable therapeutic agent for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

4.2.2. Microbiota

The concept of altered intestinal microbiome or dysbiosis is the significant IBD research event of the last decade. Newer molecular and genetic diagnostic tools have elucidated distinct changes in the gut microbiota in IBD patients and clarified the deficiencies of innate immunity [112]. IBD began to be seen as an immunodeficiency state, and impaired microbiome as a key factor in the long course of inflammation [113,114]. In this regard, manipulations of the intestinal microbiome, including the use of antibiotics, prebiotics, probiotics and fecal microbiota, are an attractive alternative for both prophylactic and therapeutic intervention in IBD [20,115,116,117].
According to the latest definition, prebiotics include substrates that are selectively used by host microorganisms that provide health benefits [118]. Substances claiming to be used as a prebiotic must meet three main criteria: be resistant to absorption and the action of enzymes in the upper gastrointestinal tract, must be fermented by colon microflora, and also be a selective substrate for the growth of beneficial bacteria and cause local or systemic effects beneficial to the health of the host [118]. Mono- and oligosaccharides meet the specified criteria to the greatest extent, although, in theory, any dietary material that is not absorbed by entering the colon can potentially be considered a prebiotic. Experimental [119] and clinical studies [120] have shown that prebiotics provide a favorable environment for the growth of probiotic strains in the intestine, inhibit potentially pathogenic bacteria, reduce inflammation of the mucous membrane, and reduce the risk of subsequent clinical relapses of IBD [116,119,120,121,122].
In recent years, much attention has been paid to the use of polysaccharides from algae as prebiotics, which are not broken down by upper enzymes and can be degraded in the colon by enzymes of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, such as xylanases and glycosyl hydrolases, phosphate transferases, hydrolases and isomerases [34,40,41,123,124,125]. Algal polysaccharides and oligosaccharides have advantages over other sources for the production of prebiotics since they can be included in food, feed or used as tablets. These dietary fibers differ in chemical and physico-chemical properties from fibers of terrestrial origin, their content is higher than in most fruits and vegetables and ranges from 33 to 50 g per 100 g of algae [123]. Some of the algae polysaccharides have already taken as dietary prebiotics and can be used in the complex treatment of IBD. These are low molecular weight polysaccharides LMW-PS, AGAROS (oligosaccharides—derivatives of agarose), xylooligosaccharides, galactose-oligosaccharides (GOS), neoagaro-oligosaccharides (NAOS), oligosaccharides-derivatives of alginate (ALGOS, arabicanic) [124]. Other polysaccharides are studied in experiments [126,127]. The data regarding the possibility of fermentation of fucoidan by intestinal microflora are contradictory, and today they cannot be considered final. Despite the evidence for the prebiotic activity of sulfated polysaccharides in vitro, there is an obvious delay in taking them as prebiotics. This circumstance may be associated with limited in vivo studies and insufficient clinical trials of the prebiotic potential of brown algae polysaccharides [125]. Enzymatic cleavage of α-1→3-bonds in the fucoidan molecule with the formation of sulfated oligosaccharides and fucose is carried out by fucoidanases, mainly isolated from marine fungi and bacteria and mollusks [128]. In this regard, some researchers believe that fucoidan is not fermented by intestinal microflora [126]. At the same time, other authors prove the prebiotic properties of sulfated polysaccharides of brown algae. Lynch et al. [129] found an increase in the total concentration of fatty acids in the proximal and distal parts of the colon of pigs, in the diet of which was added purified fucoidan. Stimulation of growth and the accumulation of biomass of bifidobacteria during their cultivation on a nutrient medium enriched with fucoidan from Fucus evanescens are shown by Kuznetsova et al. [130]. The prebiotic properties of the polysaccharide were confirmed in vivo in a model of drug dysbacteriosis in mice after a month-long treatment with a fermented milk drink with B. bifidum enriched with polysaccharides from brown alga F. evanescens [131]. An increase in Lactobacillus and Ruminococcaceae in the microbiota of the cecum of mice injected with fucoidan from Ascophyllum nodosum and L. japonica was noted in Reference [132]. Encouraging results suggesting the possibility of degradation of fucoidan by intestinal bacteria were obtained by Kong et al. [133]. The possibility of transforming fucoidan in the human body is also confirmed by the results of recent studies on the detection of fucoidan in peripheral blood after oral administration of the polysaccharide [134].
The above data show that algae polysaccharides have great potential for use as prebiotics in IBD and can realize health effects, including regulation of the composition and functions of microbiota, lowering the pH in the colon lumen and preventing intestinal colonization by pathogens, and reducing the production of reactive oxygen species providing energy sources for colonocytes and activating free fatty acid receptors. However, further studies of the prebiotic properties of oligo- and polysaccharides from algae are needed to obtain more complete information about their intestinal benefits, including in IBD.

5. Drug Delivery Systems based on Seaweed Polysaccharides

The problem of developing new technologies for the delivery of drugs with desired properties to therapeutic targets remains relevant at present [135]. The delivery of orally administered drugs to the colon is also highly desirable for the treatment of IBD [75]. However, targeting oral drugs to the colon, which is located at the distal end of the gastrointestinal tract, is difficult due to physiological problems, biochemical and environmental barriers, including those associated with mucus and epithelium [136]. Various polymer architectures (linear, branched main chains) and polymer combinations are proposed as carrier systems [137]. Marine polysaccharides have great potential for drug delivery systems because they are abundant, cheap, biocompatible and biodegradable, have a wide range of biological activity. Fucoidan deserves special attention among them. Sulfated polysaccharides have been shown to be endowed with specific features that enable this targeting ability. Some fragments of polysulfated fucoidan chains can recognize cell surface receptors, including those specific for mannose, fucose, galactose and N-acetylglucosamine residues, as well as TLR4, CD14, scavenger receptors and the mitogen-activated protein kinase receptor, and modulate the effects of signaling molecules in cells. The pleiotropic effect of sulfated polysaccharides of brown algae is due to their structural features. Some fragments of polysulfated fucoidan chains can recognize cell surface receptors, including those specific for mannose, fucose, galactose and N-acetylglucosamine residues, as well as TLR4, CD14, scavenger receptors and the mitogen-activated protein kinase receptor, and modulate the effects of signaling molecules in cells [30,137]. Therefore, sulfated polysaccharides can be used as specific recognition signals for targeting cells of the immune system and promote the accumulation of the drug in the inflamed intestine. The application of polysaccharides in pharmaceutical formulations includes their use in the manufacture of solid monolithic matrix systems, implants, films, beads, microparticles, nanoparticles, inhalable and injectable systems, as well as hydrogel formulations [30].
Recent preclinical studies have shown that nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems using algal polysaccharides can be promising tools with potentially effective results in the treatment of IBD [75]. Carrageenan and fucoidan in combination with chitosan are most often mentioned as a matrix material in the development of nanoparticles [138,139]. Interactions between the amino group of chitosan and the sulfate group of polysaccharides allow the formation of nanoparticles and limit drug release [138]. Moreover, the pH-responsive profile of fucoidan–chitosan nanoparticles prevents degradation under acidic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract and allows drug absorption in the intestine. For this reason, fucoidan and chitosan nanoparticles have been extensively studied for oral delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients [30,75,139].
Alginate-chitosan nanoparticles cross-linked by zinc ions and intended for the joint delivery of zinc and 5-aminosalicylic acid showed an excellent therapeutic effect in reducing inflammation in rats with induced colitis [140].
Wu et al. [76] investigated the effect of the berberine-loaded chitosan/fucoidan nanoparticles in protecting intestinal tight-junction barrier function against nitric oxide and inflammatory cytokines released from LPS-stimulated macrophage in a Caco-2 cells/RAW264.7 cell co-culture system. Berberine release from the nanoparticles had a fast release in simulated intestinal fluid (SIF, pH 7.4), while the release was slow in simulated gastric fluid (SGF, pH 2.0). Nanoparticles provided a decrease in TJ disturbance induced by LPS and helped restore barrier function in inflamed and damaged intestinal epithelium.
Lee et al. [75] also used co-cultivation of Caco-2 and RAW264.7 to evaluate soluble chitosan/fucoidan nanoparticles with egg shell protein membranes for treating defective intestinal epithelial cells. Nanoparticles effectively reduced NO and inhibited the production of TNF-α and IL-6 and protected epithelial cells from destruction. Furthermore, fucoidan can help the nanoparticles to target intestinal epithelial cells due to the fucose receptor on the epithelial cells. The authors consider chitosan and fucoidan nanoparticles to be potential carriers for drug delivery that reduce inflammation of the intestinal epithelium
Zhu et al. [141] constructed a biologically active complex—selenium nanoparticles coated with a polysaccharide from the green alga Ulva lactuca, possessing low toxicity and high anti-inflammatory activity. The complex had low toxicity and high anti-inflammatory activity. Supplementation with ULP-SeNPs resulted in a significant protective effect on DSS-induced acute colitis in mice including mitigation of body weight loss, and colonic inflammatory damage. ULP-SeNPs ameliorated macrophage infiltration as evidenced by decreased CD68 levels in colon tissue sections. The plasma levels of TNFα and IL-6, COX-2, and iNOS in these animals decreased compared to control animals not receiving the complex. Mechanistically, ULP-SeNPs inhibited the activation of macrophages by suppressing the nuclear translocation of NF-κB, which drives the transcription of these pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Wang et al. [142] used sodium alginate in combination with chitosan to create icariin-loaded microspheres. This drug is poorly soluble in water and has low bioavailability. The microspheres loaded with icariin could not only reduce the colonic injury by decreasing the colon mucosa damage index in rats but also reduce the inflammatory response by reducing the production and gene expression of inflammatory mediators and cytokines in colonic mucosa. All the results indicate that targeted microspheres loaded with icariin could exert the colon-protective effects through reducing the inflammatory response, which would be developed as a potential drug controlled release system for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.
Enhanced degradation of chitosan particles by enterobacteria of the colon is also a useful strategy for targeting drug release to the distal intestine. Crcarevska et al. [143] orally administered rats with colitis-induced microparticles of chitosan-Ca alginate loaded with budesonide coated with Eudragit S-100. The results showed a significant reduction in the severity of colitis after the application of particles coated with Eudragit S-100, compared with particles without coating, and with one budesonide.
Chang et al. [144] used amphiphilic thiolated sodium alginate for site-specific drug delivery in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nanospheres were synthesized by self-assembly of amphiphilic thiolated sodium alginate in deionized water, followed by crosslinking of a disulfide bond. The drug release in pH 6.0 buffer with GSH from drug-loaded nanospheres exhibited a marked increase, indicating that the nanospheres may be used for colon-specific drug delivery.
These studies show the potential of IBD treatment strategies using polysaccharide-based seaweed drug delivery systems. Nevertheless, for the successful application of this strategy in the treatment of IBD, further comprehensive studies of the patterns of accumulation of substances in the intestinal tissues are necessary.

6. Conclusions

Inflammatory bowel disease is a serious health concern among western societies worldwide. Current therapeutic strategies that use anti-inflammatory drugs, immunosuppressants, and biological treatments are often ineffective and have adverse health effects. In this context, the use of natural products has attracted widespread attention. Seaweed is a valuable source of structurally diverse bioactive compounds. The cell walls of algae are rich in polysaccharides with a wide range of biological activity. The presented materials indicate that seaweed extracts and polysaccharides are effective candidates for the development of drugs, biological food additives, and functional nutrition products for the treatment and prevention of IBD. The high therapeutic effectiveness of the extracts is due to the harmonious combination and interaction of a wide range of biologically active substances (polysaccharides, flavonoids, pectins, etc.) in their composition, which helps to enhance the pharmacological properties of each incoming ingredient and corresponds to the multivalence of the disease pathogenesis. The pleiotropic effect of sulfated polysaccharides of brown algae, due to their structural features, provides their ability to exert an effect on therapeutic IBD targets, including proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, nuclear factor NF-kB, and reactive oxygen and nitrogen forms. The prebiotic properties of oligo- and polysaccharides from seaweed are also an attractive alternative for both prophylactic and therapeutic intervention in IBD. Finally, algal polysaccharides have great potential in the development of drug delivery systems since the physicochemical properties of these carbohydrates provide the possibility of interaction with other compounds, whether drugs, proteins or other polymers.
However, currently, the majority of studies regarding the effectiveness of algal polysaccharides in IBD have been carried out in experiments on animals or ex vivo using material from patients suffering from these diseases. This circumstance is associated with difficulties in obtaining standardized drugs, which could be the basis for the creation of dosage forms. Undoubtedly, the use of algal polysaccharides in medicine will expand every year due to the further development of science and the expansion of the possibilities of obtaining standardized preparations based on these compounds. The lack of theoretical knowledge about the influence of specific structural parameters of algal polysaccharides on their biological properties is also a limiting factor. In this regard, the molecular architecture of polysaccharides and the role of structural elements in the manifestation of their biological properties are still the subject of active study and are a logical step towards the creation of drugs based on them.
We hope that further study of the relationship between the effect of polysaccharides from different types of algae, with different structure and molecular weights on immune and epithelial cells, intestinal microorganisms will contribute to a deeper understanding of their mechanisms and will help in the development of drugs, dietary supplements, functional foods for the treatment of patients with IBD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—N.N.B., T.S.Z., T.A.K.; Methodology—N.N.B., T.S.Z.; Validation—N.N.B., T.S.Z., T.A.K., I.D.M.; Formal Analysis―N.N.B., T.S.Z., T.A.K., I.D.M., S.P.K., L.N.F., S.P.E.; Writing Original Draft Preparation—N.N.B., T.S.Z.; Writing Review and Editing—N.N.B., T.S.Z., T.A.K., I.D.M. Project Administration, Funding Acquisition—L.N.F. and S.P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Gastroenterology Organisation. Global Guardian of Digestive Health. Serving the World. Available online: https://www.worldgastroenterology.org/guidelines/global-guidelines/inflammatory-bowel-disease-ibd (accessed on 4 March 2020).
  2. Cosnes, J.; Gower-Rousseau, C.; Seksik, P.; Cortot, A. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ponder, A.; Long, M.D. A clinical review of recent findings in the epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. Epidemiol. 2013, 5, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Baumgart, D.C.; Sandborn, W.J. Crohn’s disease. Lancet 2012, 380, 1590–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sudirman, S.; Hsu, Y.H.; He, J.L.; Kong, Z.L. Dietary polysaccharide-rich extract from Eucheuma cottonii modulates the inflammatory response and suppresses colonic injury on dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Burisch, J.; Munkholm, P. Inflammatory bowel disease epidemiology. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2013, 29, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. GBD 2017 inflammatory bowel disease collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jostins, L.; Ripke, S.; Weersma, R.K.; Duerr, R.H.; McGovern, D.P.; Hui, K.Y.; Lee, J.C.; Schumm, L.P.; Sharma, Y.; Anderson, C.A.; et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2012, 491, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kanai, T.; Matsuoka, K.; Naganuma, M.; Hayashi, A.; Hisamatsu, T. Diet, microbiota and inflammatory bowel disease: Lessons from Japanese food. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2014, 29, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abegunde, A.T.; Muhammad, B.H.; Bhatti, O.; Ali, T. Environmental risk factors for inflammatory bowel diseases: Evidence based literature review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 6296–6317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, D.; Cheon, J. Pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease and recent advances in biologic therapies. Immune Netw. 2017, 17, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Guan, Q.A. Comprehensive review and update on the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Immunol. Res. 2019, 7247238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Lee, S.H.; Kwon, J.E.; Cho, M.L. Immunological pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Intest. Res. 2018, 16, 26–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. de Souza, H.S.; Fiocchi, C. Immunopathogenesis of IBD: Current state of the art. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Melgar, S.; Yeung, M.M.; Forsberg, G.; Suhr, O.; Öberg, A.; Hammarstrom, S.; Danielsson, A.; Hammarström, M.L. Over-expression of interleukin 10 in mucosal T cells of patients with active ulcerative colitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2003, 134, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rana, S.V.; Sharma, S.; Kaur, J.; Prasad, K.K.; Sinha, S.K.; Kochhar, R.; Malik, A.; Morya, R.K. Relationship of cytokines, oxidative stress and G1 motility with bacterial overgrowth in ulcerative colitis patients. J. Crohns Colitis. 2014, 8, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mitsuyama, K.; Tomiyasu, N.; Takaki, K.; Masuda, J.; Yamasaki, H.; Kuwaki, K.; Takeda, T.; Kitazaki, S.; Tsuruta, O.; Sata, M. Interleukin-10 in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease: Increased serum concentrations during the recovery phase. Mediators Inflamm. 2006, 26875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lesage, S.; Zouali, H.; Gezard, J.P.; Colombel, J.F.; Belaiche, J.; Almer, S.; Tysk, C.; O’Morain, C.; Gassull, M.; Binder, V.; et al. CARD 15/NOD2 mutational analysis and genotype-phenotype correlation in 612 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 70, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Elia, P.P.; Tolentino, Y.F.M.; Bernardazzi, C.; de Souza, H.S.P. The role of innate immunity receptors in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2015, 936193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zuo, T.; Ng, S.C. The gut microbiota in the pathogenesis and therapeutics of inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Frank, D.N.; Amand, A.L.S.; Feldman, R.A.; Boedeker, E.C.; Harpaz, N.; Pace, N.R. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13780–13785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Duff, W.; Haskey, N.; Potter, G.; Alcorn, J.; Hunter, P.; Fowler, S. Non-pharmacological therapies for inflammatory bowel disease: Recommendations for self-care and physician guidance. World. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 3055–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. de Mattos, B.R.; Garcia, M.P.; Nogueira, J.B.; Paiatto, L.N.; Albuquerque, C.G.; Souza, C.L.; Fernandes, L.G.; Tamashiro, W.M.; Simioni, P.U. Inflammatory bowel disease: An overview of immune mechanisms and biological treatments. Mediators Inflamm. 2015, 493012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nielsen, O. New Strategies for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2014, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Catalan-Serraa, I.; Brennaa, Ø. Immunotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Novel and emerging treatments. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2018, 14, 2597–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kady, E.M.E.; Asker, M.S.; Mahmoud, M.G. New trends of the polysaccharides as a drug. World. J. Agri. Soil. Sci. 2019, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Murata, M.; Nakazoe, J. Production and use of marine algae in Japan. JARQ. 2001, 35, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wells, M.L.; Potin, P.; Craigie, J.S.; Raven, J.A.; Merchant, S.S.; Helliwell, K.E.; Smith, A.G.; Camire, M.E.; Brawley, S.H. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: Revisiting our understanding. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 949–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ruocco, N.; Costantini, S.; Guariniello, S.; Costantini, M. Polysaccharides from the marine environment with pharmacological, cosmeceutical and nutraceutical potential. Molecules 2016, 21, E551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cunha, L.; Grenha, A. Sulfated seaweed polysaccharides as multifunctional materials in drug delivery applications. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanna, B.; Mishra, A. Nutraceutical potential of seaweed polysaccharides: Structure, bioactivity, safety, and toxicity. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jiao, G.; Yu, G.; Zhang, J.; Ewart, H.S. Chemical structures and bioactivities of sulfated polysaccharides from marine algae. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 196–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Hu, D.J.; Cheong, K.; Zhao, J.; Li, S. Chromatography in characterization of polysaccharides from medicinal plants and fungi. J. Sep. Sci. 2013, 36, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Raposo, M.F.J.; de Morais, A.M.; de Morais, R.M. Marine polysaccharides from algae with potential biomedical applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2967–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, Y.; Maochen, X.; Qi, C.; Aiguo, J.; Hao, L.; Shuliang, S. Biological activities of fucoidan and the factors mediating its therapeutic effects: A review of recent studies. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, E183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Nagaoka, M.; Shibata, H.; Kimura-Takagi, I.; Hashimoto, S.; Aiyama, R.; Ueyama, S.; Yokokura, T. Anti-ulcer effects and biological activities of polysaccharides from marine algae. Biofactors 2000, 12, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choi, J.I.; Raghavendran, H.R.B.; Sung, N.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Chun, B.S.; Ahn, D.H.; Choi, H.S.; Kang, K.W.; Lee, J.W. Effect of fucoidan on aspirin-induced stomach ulceration in rats. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2010, 183, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lajili, S.; Ammar, H.H.; Mzoughi, Z.; Amor, H.B.H.; Muller, C.D.; Majdoub, H.; Bouraoui, A. Characterization of sulfated polysaccharide from Laurencia obtuse and its apoptotic, gastroprotective and antioxidant activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Manlusoc, J.K.T.; Hsieh, C.L.; Hsieh, C.Y.; Hsieh, S.Y.; Salac, E.S.N.; Lee, Y.-T.; Tsai, P.-W. Pharmacologic application potential of sulfated polysaccharide from marine algae. Polymers (Basel) 2019, 11, E1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. O’Sullivan, L.; Murphy, B.; McLoughlin, P.; Duggan, P.; Lawlor, P.G.; Hughes, H.; Gardiner, G.E. Prebiotics from marine macroalgae for human and animal health applications. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2038–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Okolie, C.L.; Rajendran, S.R.C.K.; Udenigwe, C.C.; Aryee, A.N.A.; Mason, B. Prospects of brown seaweed polysaccharides (BSP) as prebiotics and potential immunomodulators. J. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ngo, D.N.; Kim, S.K. Sulfated polysaccharides as bioactive agents from marine algae. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hifney, A.F.; Fawzy, M.A.; Abdel-Gawad, K.M.; Gomaa, M. Upgrading the antioxidant properties of fucoidan and alginate from Cystoseira trinodis by fungal fermentation or enzymatic pretreatment of the seaweed biomass. Food Chem. 2018, 269, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Menshova, R.; Shevchenko, N.; Imbs, T.; Zvyagintseva, T.; Maluarenko, O.; Zaporoshets, T.; Besednova, N.; Ermakova, S. Fucoidans from brown alga Fucus evanescens: Structure and biological activity. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Li, B.; Lu, F.; Wei, X.; Zhao, R. Fucoidan: Structure and bioactivity. Molecules 2008, 13, 1671–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Senni, K.; Pereira, J.; Gueniche, F.; Delbarre-Ladrat, C.; Sinquin, C.; Ratiskol, J.; Godeau, G.; Fischer, A.-M.; Helley, D.; Colliec-Jouault, S. Marine polysaccharides: A source of bioactive molecules for cell therapy and tissue engineering. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1664–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Citkowska, A.; Szekalska, M.; Winnicka, K. Possibilities of fucoidan utilization in the development of pharmaceutical dosage Forms. Review. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Mansour, M.; Balti, R.; Yacoubi, L.; Ollivier, V.; Chaubet, F.; Maaroufi, R. Primary structure and anticoagulant activity of fucoidan from the sea cucumber Holothuria polii. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 1145–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Phull, A.R.; Ali, A.; Ahmed, M.; Zia, M.; Haq, I.; Kim, S. In vitro antileishmanial, antibacterial, antifungal and anticancer activity of fucoidan from Undaria pinnatifida. Int. J. Biosci. 2017, 11, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fernando, I.P.S.; Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Samarakoon, K.W.; Lee, W.W.; Kim, H.S.; Kang, N.; Ranasinghe, P.; Lee, H.; Jeon, J.Y. A fucoidan fraction purified from Chnoospora minima; a potential inhibitor of LPS-induced inflammatory responses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zubia, M.; Payri, C.; Deslandes, E. Alginate, mannitol, phenolic compounds and biological activities of two range-extending brown algae, Sargassum mangarevense and Turbinaria ornata (Phaeophyta, Fucales), from Tahiti (French Polynesia). J. Appl. Phycol. 2008, 20, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Augst, A.D.; Kong, H.J.; Mooney, D.J. Alginate Hydrogels as Biomaterials. Macromol. Biosci. 2006, 6, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rioux, L.; Turgeon, S.; Beaulieu, M. Characterization of polysaccharides extracted from brown seaweeds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 69, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ermakova, S.; Men’shova, R.; Vishchuk, O.; Kim, S.; Um, B.; Isakov, V.; Zvyagintseva, T. Water-soluble polysaccharides from the brown algae Eisenia bicyclis: Structural characteristics and antitumor activity. Algal Res. 2013, 2, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Malyarenko, O.S.; Usoltseva, R.V.; Shevchenko, N.M.; Isakov, V.V.; Zvyagintseva, T.N.; Ermakova, S.P. In vitro anticancer activity of the laminarans from Far Eastern brown seaweeds and their sulfated derivatives. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Smith, A.G.; O’Doherty, J.V.; Reilly, P.; Ryan, M.T.; Bahar, B.; Sweeney, T. The effects of laminarin derived from Laminaria digitata on measurements of gut health: Selected bacterial populations, intestinal fermentation, mucin gene expression and cytokine gene expression in the pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 105, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lee, J.Y.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, H.-J.; Park, W. Immunostimulatory Effect of Laminarin on RAW 264.7 Mouse Macrophages. Molecules 2012, 5, 5404–5411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Li, Z.-Y.; Valliappan, K. Prospect of Marine Algae for Production of Industrially Important Chemicals. Algal Biorefinery: An Integrated Approach; Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology: Kharagpur, India, 2015; pp. 195–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Holdt, S.L.; Kraan, S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: Functional food applications and legislation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 543–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, L.; Ni, R.; Shao, Y.; Mao, S. Carrageenan and its applications in drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 103, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Qureshi, D.; Nayak, S.K.; Maji, S.; Kim, D.; Banerjee, I.; Pal, K. Carrageenan: A wonder polymer from marine algae for potential drug delivery applications. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 1172–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lahaye, M.; Robic, A. structure and functional properties of Ulvan, a polysaccharide from green seaweeds. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1765–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Low, D.; Nguyen, D.D.; Mizoguchi, E. Animal models of ulcerative colitis and their application in drug research. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2013, 7, 1341–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Kiesler, P.; Fuss, I.; Strober, W. Experimental models of inflammatory bowel diseases. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 1, 154–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Neurath, M.; Fuss, I.; Strober, W. TNBS-colitis. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2000, 19, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Heller, F.; Fuss, I.; Nieuwenhuis, E.E. Oxazolone colitis, a Th2 colitis model resembling ulcerative colitis, is mediated by IL-13-producing NK-T cells. Immunity 2002, 17, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Chassaing, B.; Aitken, J.D.; Malleshappa, M.; Vijay-Kumar, M. Dextran Sulfate Sodium (DSS)-Induced Colitis in Mice. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2015, 104, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jeon, Y.-D.; Kang, S.-H.; Bang, K.-S.; Chang, Y.-N.; Lee, J.-H.; Jin, J.-S. Glycyrrhetic acid ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in vivo. Molecules 2016, 21, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Geens, M.M.; Niewold, T.A. Niewold. Optimizing culture conditions of a porcine epithelial cell line IPEC-J2 through a histological and physiological characterization. Cytotechnology 2011, 63, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Berri, M.; Oliver, M.; Holbert, S.; Dupont, J. Ulvan from Ulva armoricana (Chlorophyta) activates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway via TLR4 to induce intestinal cytokine production. Algal Res. 2017, 28, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pearce, S.C.; Coia, H.G.; Karl, J.P.; Pantoja-Feliciano, I.G.; Zachos, N.C.; Racicot, K. Intestinal in vitro and ex vivo models to study host-microbiome interactions and acute stressors. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ponce de León-Rodríguez, M.C.; Guyot, J.-P.; Laurent-Babot, C. Intestinal in vitro cell culture models and their potential to study the effect of food components on intestinal inflammation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3648–3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tanoue, T.; Nishitani, Y.; Kanazawa, K.; Hashimoto, T.; Mizuno, M. In vitro model to estimate gut inflammation using co-cultured Caco-2 and RAW264.7 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 374, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wu, S.J.; Don, T.M.; Lin, C.W.; Mi, F.-L. Delivery of berberine using chitosan/fucoidan-taurine conjugate nanoparticles for treatment of defective intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 5677–5697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Lee, M.; Huang, Y.C. Soluble eggshell membrane protein-loaded chitosan/fucoidan nanoparticles for treatment of defective intestinal epithelial cells. Int. J. Biolal. Macromol. 2019, 131, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Eri, R.; McGuckin, M.A.; Wadley, R. T cell transfer model of colitis: A great tool to assess the contribution of T cells in chronic intestinal inflammation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 844, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Neurath, M. Cytokines in Inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Mozaffari, S.; Nikfar, S.; Abdolghaffari, A.; Abdollahi, M. New biologic therapeutics for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2014, 14, 583–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Galvez, J. Role of Th17 Cells in the Pathogenesis of Human IBD. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 928461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zenewicz, L.; Antov, A.; Flavell, R. CD4 T-cell differentiation and inflammatory bowel disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2009, 15, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bettelli, E.; Carrier, Y.; Gao, W.; Korn, T.; Strom, T.; Oukka, M.; Weiner, H.; Kuchroo, V. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature 2006, 441, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Danese, S.; Fiocchi, C. Ulcerative colitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Lean, Q.Y.; Eri, R.D.; Fitton, J.H.; Patel, R.P.; Gueven, N. Fucoidan extracts ameliorate acute colitis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0128453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Pereira, L. Biological and therapeutic properties of the seaweed polysaccharides. Int. Biol. Rev. 2018, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Matsumoto, S.; Nagaoka, M.; Hara, T.; Kimura-Takagi, I.; Mistuyama, K.; Ueyama, S. Fucoidan derived from Cladosiphon okamuranus Tokida ameliorates murine chronic colitis through the down-regulation of interleukin-6 production on colonic epithelial cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2004, 136, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ryan, M.; O’Shea, C.; Collins, C.; O’Doherty, J.; Sweeney, T. Effects of dietary supplementation with Laminaria hyperborea, Laminaria digitate, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the IL-17 pathway in the porcine colon. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 263–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. O’Shea, C.J.; O’Doherty, J.V.; Callanan, J.J.; Doyle, D.; Thornton, K.; Sweeney, T. The effect of algal polysaccharides laminarin and fucoidan on colonic pathology, cytokine gene expression and Enterobacteriaceae in a dextran sodium sulfate-challenged porcine model. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bitencourt, M.; Dantas, G.; Lira, D.; Barbosa-Filho, J.; de Miranda, J.; Santos, D.; Souto, J. Aqueous and methanolic extracts of Caulerpa mexicana suppress cell migration and ear edema induced by inflammatory agents. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1332–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bitencourt, M.A.O.; Silva, H.M.D.; Abílio, G.M.F.; Miranda, G.E.C.; Moura, A.M.A.; de Araújo-Júnior, J.X.; Silveira, E.J.D.; Santos, B.V.O.; Souto, J.T. Anti-inflammatory effects of methanolic extract of green algae Caulerpa mexicana in a murine model of ulcerative colitis. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2015, 25, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Sousa, M.B.; Pires, K.M.S.; Alencar, D.B.; Saker-Sampaio, S. α- and β-carotene, and α-tocopherol in fresh seaweeds. Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2008, 28, 953–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Zheng, J.; Chen, Y.; Yao, F.; Chen, W.; Shi, G. Chemical composition and antioxidant/antimicrobial activities in supercritical carbon dioxide fluid extract of Gloiopeltis tenax. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 2634–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Thomas, S.; Baumgart, D.C. Targeting leukocyte migration and adhesion in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Inflammopharmacology 2012, 20, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Herter, J.; Zarbock, A. Integrin Regulation during Leukocyte Recruitment. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 4451–4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Berteau, O.; Mulloy, B. Sulfated fucans, fresh perspectives: Structures, functions, and biological properties of sulfated fucans and overview of enzymes active toward this class of polysaccharide. Glycobiology 2003, 13, 29–40R. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Semenov, A.V.; Mazurov, A.V.; Preobrazhenskaya, M.E.; Ushakova, N.A.; Mikhailov, V.I.; Berman, A.E.; Usov, A.I.; Nifantiev, N.E.; Bovin, N.V. Sulfated polysaccharides as inhibitors of the receptor activity of P-selectin and P-selectin-dependent inflammation. Vopr. Med. Chem. 1999, 44, 135–143. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang, X.W.; Liu, Q.; Thorlacius, H. Inhibition of selectin function and leukocyte rolling protects against dextran sodium sulfate-induced murine colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2001, 36, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zen, K.; Liu, Y.; Cairo, D.; Parkos, C.A. CD11b/CD18-dependent interactions of neutrophils with intestinal epithelium are mediated by fucosylated proteoglycans. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 5270–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Cross, R.K.; Wilson, K.T. Nitric oxide in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2003, 9, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rezaie, A.; Parker, R.D.; Abdollahi, M. Oxidative stress and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease: An epiphenomenon or the cause? Dig. Dis. Sci. 2007, 52, 2015–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jahanshahi, G.; Motavasel, V.; Rezaie, A.; Hashtroudi, A.A.; Daryani, N.E.; Abdollahi, M. Alterations in antioxidant power and levels of epidermal growth factor and nitric oxide in saliva of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2004, 49, 1752–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Arab, H.H.; Al-Shorbagy, M.; Abdallah, D.; Nassar, N. Telmisartan attenuates colon inflammation, oxidative perturbations and apoptosis in a rat model of experimental inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Jaswir, I.; Monsur, H.A. Anti-inflammatory compounds of macro algae origin: A review. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 15, 7146–7154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chakraborty, K.; Joseph, D.; Praveen, N.K. Antioxidant activities and phenolic contents of three red seaweeds (Division: Rhodophyta) harvested from the gulf of mannar of peninsular India. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 1924–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Tariq, A.; Athar, M.; Ara, J.; Sultana, V.; Ehteshamul-Haque, S.; Ahmad, M. Biochemical evaluation of antioxidant activity and polysaccharides fractions in seaweeds. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manage. 2015, 1, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hering, N.; Fromm, M.; Schulzke, J. Determinants of colonic barrier function in inflammatory bowel disease and potential therapeutics. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 1035–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zhong, Q.; Wei, B.; Wang, S.; Ke, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H. The antioxidant activity of polysaccharides derived from marine organisms: An overview. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Artis, D. Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal bacteria and maintenance of immune homeostasis in the gut. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bruewer, M.; Luegering, A.; Kucharzik, T.; Parkos, C.; Madara, J.; Hopkins, A.; Nusrat, A. Proinflammatory cytokines disrupt epithelial barrier function by apoptosis-independent mechanisms. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 6164–6172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Turner, J. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 799–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Iraha, A.; Chinen, H.; Hokama, A.; Yonashiro, T.; Kinjo, T.; Kishimoto, K.; Nakamoto, M.; Hirata, T.; Kinjo, N.; Higa, F.; et al. Fucoidan enhances intestinal barrier function by upregulating the expression of claudin-1. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 5500–5507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yang, H.-S.; Haj, F.G.; Lee, M.; Kang, I.; Zhang, G.; Lee, Y. Laminaria japonica extract enhances intestinal barrier function by altering inflammatory response and tight junction-related protein in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated Caco-2 cells. Nutrients 2019, 11, E1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Hwang, P.-A.; Phan, N.N.; Lu, W.J.; Hieu, B.T.N. Low-molecular-weight fucoidan and high-stability fucoxanthin from brown seaweed exert prebiotics and anti-inflammatory activities in Caco-2 cells. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 60, 32033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Hold, G.; Smith, M.; Grange, C.; Watt, E.; El-Omar, E.; Mukhopadhya, I. Role of the gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: What have we learnt in the past 10 years? World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 1192–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Holleran, G.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Ianiro, G.; Pecere, S.; Pizzoferrato, M.; Petito, V.; Graziani, C.; McNamara, D.; Gasbarrini, A.; Scaldaferri, F. Gut microbiota and inflammatory bowel disease: So far so gut! Minerva Gastroenterol. Dietol. 2017, 63, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Debnath, T.; Kim, D.; Lim, B. Natural products as a source of anti-inflammatory agents associated with inflammatory bowel disease. Molecules 2013, 18, 7253–7570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Nie, Y.; Lin, Q.; Luo, F. Effects of non-starch polysaccharides on inflammatory bowel disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Al Mijan, M.A.; Lim, B.O. Diets, functional foods, and nutraceuticals as alternative therapies for inflammatory bowel disease: Present status and future trends. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 2673–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gibson, G.R.; Hutkins, R.; Sanders, M.E.; Prescott, S.L.; Reimer, R.A.; Salminen, S.J.; Scott, J.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K.S.; Cani, P.D.; et al. Expert consensus document: The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Joo, E.; Yamane, S.; Hamasaki, A.; Harada, N.; Matsunaga, T.; Muraoka, A.; Suzuki, K.; Nasteska, D.; Fukushima, T.; Hayashi, T.; et al. Enteral supplement enriched with glutamine, fiber, and oligosaccharide attenuates experimental colitis in mice. Nutrition 2013, 29, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Barbalho, S.M.; Goulart, R.A.; Aranao, A.L.C.; de Oliveira, P.G.C. Inflammatory bowel diseases and fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols: An overview. J. Med. Food. 2018, 21, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Macfarlane, G.; Steed, H.; Macfarlane, S. Bacterial metabolism and health-related effects of galactooligosaccharides and other prebiotics. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 104, 305–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wong, C.; Harris, P.J.; Ferguson, L.R. Potential benefits of dietary fibre intervention in inflammatory bowel disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Gomez-Zavaglia, A.; Lage, M.A.P.; Jimenez-Lopez, C.; Mejuto, J.C.; Simal-Gandara, J. The potential of seaweeds as a source of functional ingredients of prebiotic and antioxidant value. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Raposo, M.F.J.; de Morais, A.M.; de Morais, R.M.S. Emergent sources of prebiotics: Seaweeds and microalgae. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Li, M.; Shang, Q.; Li, G.; Wang, X.; Yu, G. Degradation of marine algae-derived carbohydrates by bacteroidetes isolated from human gut microbiota. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Michel, C.; Lahaye, M.; Bonnet, C.; Mabeau, S.; Barry, J.L. In vitro fermentation by human faecal bacteria of total and purified dietary fibres from brown seaweeds. Br. J. Nutr. 1996, 75, 263–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Devill, C.; Gharbi, M.; Dandrifosse, G.; Peulen, O. Study on the effects of laminarin, a polysaccharide from seaweed, on gut characteristics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 1717–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kusaykin, M.; Bakunina, I.; Sova, V.; Ermakova, S.; Kuznetsova, T.; Besednova, N.; Zaporozhets, T.; Zvyagintseva, T. Structure, biological activity, and enzymatic transformation of fucoidans from the brown seaweeds. Biotechnol. J. 2008, 3, 904–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lynch, M.B.; Sweeney, T.; Callan, J.J.; O’Sullivan, J.T.; O’Doherty, J.V. The effect of dietary laminaria-derived laminarin and fucoidan on nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilisation, intestinal microflora and volatile fatty acid concentration in pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kusnetsova, T.A.; Zaporozhets, T.S.; Makarenkova, I.D.; Besednova, N.N.; Timchenko, N.F.; Zvyagintseva, T.N.; Shevchenko, N.M.; Mandrakova, N.V.; Melnikov, V.G. The prebiotic potential of polysaccharides from the brown alga Fucus evanescens and significance for the clinical use. Pac. Med. J. 2012, 1, 37–40. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  131. Zaporozhets, T.S.; Besednova, N.N.; Kusnetsova, T.A.; Zvyagintseva, T.N.; Makarenkova, I.D.; Kryzhanovsky, S.P.; Melnikov, V.G. The prebiotic potential of polysaccharides and extracts of seaweeds. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2014, 40, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Shang, Q.; Shan, X.; Cai, C.; Hao, J.; Li, G.; Yu, G. Dietary fucoidan modulates the gut microbiota in mice by increasing the abundance of Lactobacillus and Ruminococcaceae. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 3224–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kong, Q.; Dong, S.; Gao, J.; Jiang, C. In vitro fermentation of sulfated polysaccharides from E. prolifera and L. japonica by human fecal microbiota. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 91, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Tokita, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Mochida, H.; Iha, M.; Nagamine, T. Development of a fucoidan-specific antibody and measurement of fucoidan in serum and urine by sandwich ELISA. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Misra, A.; Shahiwala, A. Novel Drug Delivery Technologies: Innovative Strategies for Drug Re-positioning; Misra, A., Shahiwala, A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-981-13-3641-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zang, M.; Merlin, D. Nanoparticle-Based Oral Drug Delivery Systems Targeting the Colon for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2018, 24, 1401–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Fahmy, T.M.; Fong, P.M.; Goyal, A.; Saltzman, W.M. Targeted for drug delivery. Mater. Today 2005, 8, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Liu, Y.; Yao, W.; Wang, S.; Geng, D.; Zheng, Q.; Chen, A. Preparation and characterization of fucoidan-chitosan nanospheres by the sonification method. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 3844–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Da Silva, L.C.R.P.; Todaro, V.; Do Carmo, F.A.; Frattani, F.S.; De Sousa, V.P.; Rodrigues, C.R.; Sathler, P.C.; Cabral, L.M. A promising oral fucoidan-based antithrombotic nanosystem: Development, activity and safety. Nanotechnology 2018, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Duan, H.; Lü, S.; Qin, H.; Gao, C.; Bai, X.; Wei, Y.; Wu, X.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z. Co-delivery of zinc and 5-aminosalicylic acid from alginate/N-succinyl-chitosan blend microspheres for synergistic therapy of colitis. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 516, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhu, C.; Zhang, S.; Song, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ling, Q.; Hoffmann, P.R.; Li, J.; Chen, T.; Zheng, W.; Huang, Z. Selenium nanoparticles decorated with Ulva latuca polysaccharide potentially attenuate colitis by inhibiting NF-kB mediated hyper inflammation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Wang, Q.S.; Wang, G.F.; Zhou, J.; Gao, L.N.; Cui, Y.L. Colon targeted oral drug delivery system based on alginate-chitosan microspheres loaded with icariin in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 515, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Crcarevska, M.S.; Dodov, M.G.; Petrusevska, G.; Gjorgoski, I.; Goracinova, K. Bioefficacy of budesonide loaded crosslinked polyelectrolyte microparticles in rat model of induced colitis. J. Drug Target. 2009, 17, 788–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Chang, D.; Lei, J.; Cui, H.; Lu, N.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, X.; Gao, C.; Zheng, H.; Yin, Y. Disulfide cross-linked nanospheres from sodium alginate derivative for inflammatory bowel disease: Preparation, characterization, and in vitro drug release behavior. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Besednova, N.N.; Zaporozhets, T.S.; Kuznetsova, T.A.; Makarenkova, I.D.; Kryzhanovsky, S.P.; Fedyanina, L.N.; Ermakova, S.P. Extracts and Marine Algae Polysaccharides in Therapy and Prevention of Inflammatory Diseases of the Intestine. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18060289

AMA Style

Besednova NN, Zaporozhets TS, Kuznetsova TA, Makarenkova ID, Kryzhanovsky SP, Fedyanina LN, Ermakova SP. Extracts and Marine Algae Polysaccharides in Therapy and Prevention of Inflammatory Diseases of the Intestine. Marine Drugs. 2020; 18(6):289. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18060289

Chicago/Turabian Style

Besednova, Natalya N., Tatyana S. Zaporozhets, Tatyana A. Kuznetsova, Ilona D. Makarenkova, Sergey P. Kryzhanovsky, Lydmila N. Fedyanina, and Svetlana P. Ermakova. 2020. "Extracts and Marine Algae Polysaccharides in Therapy and Prevention of Inflammatory Diseases of the Intestine" Marine Drugs 18, no. 6: 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18060289

APA Style

Besednova, N. N., Zaporozhets, T. S., Kuznetsova, T. A., Makarenkova, I. D., Kryzhanovsky, S. P., Fedyanina, L. N., & Ermakova, S. P. (2020). Extracts and Marine Algae Polysaccharides in Therapy and Prevention of Inflammatory Diseases of the Intestine. Marine Drugs, 18(6), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18060289

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop