1. Introduction
Skin photoaging happens as a result of exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light. Only 5% of solar radiation reaches the Earth’s surface, comprising wavelengths in the ranges of 315–400 nm (ultraviolet A (UVA)), 280–315 nm (UVB), 100‒280 nm (UVC). Specifically, UVA accounts for approximately 96.5% of the daily UV irradiation [
1,
2]. UVA irradiation can penetrate the epidermal and dermal layers of the skin, and contribute to oxidative stress, premature skin aging, and photo-carcinogenesis. Sustained exposure to UVA affects cell growth and survival, and induces DNA damage, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-galactosidase) activity [
3,
4]. Repeated exposure of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) to UVA irradiation has been established as a cellular senescence model to investigate certain characteristics of epidermal and dermal skin photoaging. When HDFs are exposed to UVA irradiation, there is an increase in the production of ROS, which leads to apoptosis, upregulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) expression, and the induction of senescence. UVA irradiation has also been reported to directly or indirectly lead to the release of inflammatory mediators, as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines. All these UVA-induced factors are responsible for macro- and micro- structural deterioration of human skin [
5,
6,
7].
In skin, UVA irradiation can lead to the induction of collagen fiber disorganization and injury, substantial deposition of abnormal elastic fibers, and upregulation of glycosaminoglycans. Prolonged exposure to UVA results in the degradation of collagen and elastin, and reduction in the synthesis of collagen [
8]. MMPs are zinc-containing endopeptidases that are able to digest various components of the dermal extracellular matrix (ECM), such as fibrillary collagen, elastin, laminin, proteoglycans, and fibronectin. They can be classified into five groups based on structural similarity, as well as substrate specificity: collagenases (MMP-1, MMP-8, and MMP-13), gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9), stromelysins (MMP-3, MMP-10, and MMP-11), matrilysins (MMP-7, and MMP-26), and membrane-type-MMPs (MMP-14, MMP-15, and MMP-16). These proteins, and particularly MMP-1 and MMP-3, are thought to play a critical role in UVA-induced skin photoaging [
2,
9,
10]. MMP-1 and MMP-3 are mainly secreted by HDFs, and degrade fibrillary collagen and type IV collagen. Studies on skin photoaging have shown that UVA promotes the degradation of ECM, as evidenced by a reduction in soluble collagen in the dermis that is associated with the upregulation of MMP-1 and MMP-3 [
1,
9].
Secondary metabolites derived from marine algae have been identified as a novel class of agents that can be used as cosmetic ingredients, as they have topical antibacterial, antiwinkle, anti-inflammatory and antimelanogenic properties [
11]. The secondary metabolites of marine algae play an important role in the green synthesis of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) containing active substances with antioxidant properties. The green synthesis of GNPs could also be mediated by marine algae extracts containing molecules that serve as reducing, stabilizing, and capping agents [
12,
13,
14]. GNPs have been used to treat a number of diseases by virtue of their biocompatibility and unique properties, such as conductivity, optical catalytic activity, and better structural characteristics than their bulk counterparts. GNP-based marine algae have been investigated thoroughly, and it has been experimentally documented that they possess medicinal properties, as well as various biological effects, such as antioxidative, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor activities [
15,
16,
17,
18].
Ecklonia stolonifera is a brown alga of the Laminariaceae family that is mainly distributed in the sea forests off the coasts of Far Eastern countries, such as Korea, China, and Japan [
19]. The pharmacological effects of
Ecklonia stolonifera can be attributed to the plant’s high levels of phlorotannins, phenolic compounds, terpenoids, steroids, and vitamins, all of which are associated with a range of effects, such as antioxidative, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, hepatoprotective, neuroprotective, antidermal-aging activities [
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25,
26]. The present study demonstrated that the
Ecklonia stolonifera extract is more effective than other conventional methods for the efficient synthesis of GNPs due to the presence of a large number of secondary metabolites which are required for the reduction, capsulation, and stabilization of GNPs. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the potential antiphotoaging effects of ES-GNPs in UVA irradiated HDFs.
3. Discussion
UV irradiation-induced skin aging is a heavy extrinsic form of aging resulting in the formation of winkles and a reduction in the levels of collagen and elastin in human skin. UVA irradiation causes DNA damage, degradation of collagen fibers, lipid oxidation and skin aging by generating intracellular ROS [
2]. Presently used antiphotoaging candidates suffer from several shortcomings such as poor water solubility, biodegradability and bioavailability [
13,
14]. Nanomaterial therapy is one of the promising approaches to combat the aforementioned limitations associated with most antiphotoaging candidates. Photo-aging is prevented or treated effectively by nanomaterial therapy, whereby brown alga extracts are employed.
Ecklonia stolonifera has several biological actions including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antidermal-aging activities. Due to the potential of brown alga and GNPs, our study focused on the design of
Ecklonia stolonifera-based GNPs. The particle size analysis of ES-GNPs using DLS showed average particle diameters of 49.5 ± 1.0 nm, while the PDI and zeta potential were 0.287 ± 0.001 and −25.23 ± 1.1 mV, respectively, demonstrating good dispersion. A particle size analysis of the ES-GNPs showed dimensions of 27.9 ± 4.3 nm with spherical shape morphologies, as confirmed by HR-TEM. The physicochemical properties of the ES-GNPs were successfully studied by DLS, HR-TEM, EDS, XRD and FT-IR. The EDS, XRD and FT-IR spectra exhibited expected functional groups, confirming the successful reduction, stabilization and capsulation of
Ecklonia stolonifera extracts onto GNPs.
UVA is skin photoaging inducer causing significant cellular senescence and ECM damage [
9]. Hence, there is a need to develop interventions to protect against its effects. We conducted the present study using ES-GNPs to examine cell viability, SA-β-galactosidase activity, ROS production, lysosome content, the expression of senescence related proteins, expression and secretion of MMP-1/-3 UVA irradiated HDFs. The HDF cytotoxicity of the ES extract and ES-GNPs was first evaluated using a CCK-8 assay; ES extract and ES-GNPs demonstrated cytotoxicity in a concentration-dependent way. The most common cellular senescence was characterized by SA-β-galactosidase activation. A hypothetical hydrolase, e.g., SA-β-galactosidase, is commonly used as an indirect essential maker of senescent cells. There is evidence showing that the HDF senescence caused by UVA irradiation could cause the increase of SA-β-galactosidase activity [
4]. In our study, UVA irradiation caused an increase in SA-β-galactosidase activity in HDF, while intervention with ES-GNPs noticeably diminished the impact thereof.
It is generally accepted that cellular senescence can accumulate intracellular ROS production. Furthermore, a study demonstrated that a high lysosome content may play a significant role in the process of the HDF senescence, which is stimulated by UVA irradiation [
3]. Our results were in accordance with previous studies, as we found essential mediators for the promotion of UVA-irradiated HDF senescence, which was also evident by the ROS production and lysosome contents. This increase was further attenuated significantly by ES-GNPs. Therefore, the inhibition of ROS production and lysosome contents was due to the ability of ES-GNPs to reduce HDF senescence by stimulating UVA irradiation. Senescence related proteins including p16, p21 and p-p53 have also been proposed to play a critical role in UVA-irradiated HDF senescence [
4]. In our study, we found that treatment with ES-GNPs inhibited the expression level of p16, p21 and p-p53, indicating the dependence of p16, p21 and p-p53 in ES-GNP-initiated anticellular senescence effects.
UVA irradiation not only affects the HDF functions, but also regulates the collagen microenvironment which, in turn, promotes MMPs expression. Thus, this alteration is a prominent feature of UVA-photoaged HDF. In particular, MMP-1/-3 is frequently expressed in HDF and plays an important role in HDF senescence. MMP-1/-3 inhibitors have been shown to improve anticellular senescence effects and decrease the SA-β-galactosidase activity and expression levels of senescence related proteins [
9,
10]. Therefore, crosstalk between the UVA irradiated HDF senescence and MMP-1/-3 needs further investigation. In the present study, ES-GNPs were shown to hinder the expression and secretion of MMP-1/-3 that perform vital roles in the development of UVA irradiated HDF senescence.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Reagents
In this study, 2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), 3-(4,5-dimethythiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT), chloroauric acid (HAuCl4·3H2O), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All chemicals were of analytical grade.
4.2. Free Radical Scavenging Assay
The DPPH radical scavenging activity of ES extracts was determined by following a previously published method [
30], with slight modifications. ES extracts were mixed with DPPH solution (60 µM) in 24 well microplates. The samples were shaken vigorously and then incubated at 25 °C for 2 h in the dark; then, the optical density was measured at 510 nm on a FLUOstar Omega Plate Reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). The ABTS assay was performed to determine the radical scavenging activity of ES extracts in accordance with a previously published method [
31], with slight modifications. ES extracts were mixed with ABTS solution (7 mM) and potassium persulfate (2.6 mM) and then incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 30 min. The absorbance was quantified at 734 nm on a spectrophotometer (Evolution 300 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA).
4.3. Preparation of the Ecklonia stolonifera Extract
Ecklonia stolonifera samples were collected from Jeju Island, Jeju Province, Korea. Botanical identification was made by Wook Jae Lee (Jeju Technopark, Jeju, Korea), and a sample specimen was deposited at the herbarium of the Jeju Biodiversity Research Institute, Jeju, Korea. The dried Ecklonia stolonifera samples were homogenized into a fine powder using an electric mixer (HMF-3100S, Hanil Electric, Seoul, Korea). The Ecklonia stolonifera extract was prepared by dissolving the powder in 80% ethanol at room temperature. This solution was then filtered and concentrated using a rotary vacuum evaporator (Buchi Rotavapor R-144, Buchi Labortechnik, Flawil, Switzerland).
4.4. Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization Of ES-GNPS
The synthesis and physicochemical characterization of ES-GNPs were determined following the method described by [
18]. In brief, to synthesize the ES-GNPs, an aqueous solution consisting of 1 mM gold (III) chloride solution (HAuCl
4) was mixed with the ES extract (2 mg/mL). The mixture was rigorously stirred and incubated at 25 °C for 15 min. The color change from yellow to violet after 15 min indicated the formation of ES-GNPs. ES-GNPs were detected using an Evolution 300 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA) from 300 to 800 nm. The particle size, zeta-potential, and polydispersity index (PDI) of ES-GNPs were determined at 25 ℃ by DLS technique using Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). The ES-GNPs were placed in a disposable zeta cell at 25 ℃. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using an X’Pert3 Powder X-ray Diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) operating at a scanning range of 30 to 80; voltage, 40 kV; and current, 30 mA. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was carried out using KBr pellets on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum GX FT-IR spectrophotometer operating in the range of 4000 and 400 cm
−1. The surface morphology, crystallinity, and chemical composition of the ES-GNPs were examined using high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), fast Fourier transform (FFT), and high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was performed on Thermo Scientific (FEI) Talos F200X G2 TEM.
4.5. Photocatalytic Activities of ES-GNPS
The photocatalytic activity of ES-GNPs was evaluated by observing the degradation of methylene blue and rhodamine B [
30]. In brief, ES-GNPs were added to a solution containing methylene blue (0.8 mM) and rhodamine B (0.05 mM); then, ice cold sodium borohydride (0.06 M) solution was added. The degradation of the dye was monitored on an Evolution 300 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA) in the range of 300–800 nm at regular intervals (1 min).
4.6. Cell Culture and Establishment of a Cellular Model of UVA Irradiation-Induced Ssenescence
Human dermal fibroblasts were obtained from Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA). They were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA), under a humidified atmosphere (95% air, 5% CO2) at 37 °C. All experiments were performed with HDFs from passage 4–6. First, HDFs were cultured in 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 104 cells per well for 24 h. Afterward, HDFs were treated with ES-GNPs (100 µg/mL) for 24 h; then, HDFs were exposed to UVA irradiation (Bio-Link BLX-365; Villber-Lourmat, Eberhardzell, Germany) with 5 × 8 W tubes (365 nm) serving as the UVA source. HDFs were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were then irradiated with UVA at 10 J/cm2. Then, PBS was removed, and HDFs were retreated with ES-GNPs (100 µg/mL) for 24 h. The control comprised untreated and unirradiated cells.
4.7. Cell Counting Kit-8 Assay
The viability of HDFs was assessed using the CCK-8 assay (Sigma, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density value was determined using a FLUOstar Omega Plate Reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) at 450 nm.
4.8. Senescence-Associated β-Galactosidase (SA-β-gal) Assay
SA-β-gal activity was determined using the senescence β-galactosidase staining kit (Cell Signaling Technology; Beverly, MA, USA), and a fluorogenic substrate based Quantitative Cellular Senescence Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc.; San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The proportions of SA-β-gal staining in the HDFs were represented as a percentage of the total number of HDFs counted in the optical field. SA-β-gal-stained HDFs were identified based on the fluorescent intensity that was recorded on a Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter FC500, Pasadena, CA, USA).
4.9. Measurement of Intracellular ROS Production and Lysosome Content
Intracellular ROS levels and lysosome content in the treated HDFs were evaluated using the ROS assay kit (CM-H2DCFDA, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Miami, OK, USA) and Lysotracker Green DND-26 (Cell signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, after UVA irradiation, the HDFs were rinsed with PBS and incubated with CM-H2DCFDA or Lysotracker Green DND-26 for 30 min in the dark. The fluorescent intensity was proportional to the intracellular ROS levels and lysosome content. Thereafter, intracellular ROS levels were determined based on the fluorescent intensity that was recorded on a Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter FC500, Pasadena, CA, USA).
4.10. Cell Cycle Assay
Flow cytometric analysis was conducted to investigate the cell cycle distribution of the UVA-irradiated HDFs. Briefly, HDFs were collected by trypsinization and washed three times with PBS. Subsequently, HDFs were stained with Propidium Iodide ReadyProbes Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Milpitas, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Finally, cell cycle analysis was performed on a Flow Cytometer Cytomics FC 500 (Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA, USA).
4.11. Total RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real Time PCR Analysis
The Total RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real Time PCR was used with some alterations to determine the mRNA levels [
18]. Total RNA was isolated from HDFs using RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA). Quantitative Real Time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using SYBR Green qPCR master mixes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA). Real time PCR assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The relative amount of target mRNA was determined using the Ct method by normalizing target mRNA Ct values to those for GAPDH (ΔCt). The real-time PCR cycling conditions were 95 °C for 5 min, 40 cycles for 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, followed by fluorescence measurement. The primer sequences used were as follows: MMP-1-sense (5′- tctgacgttgatcccagagagcag-3′), MMP-1-anti-sense (5′- cagggtgacaccagtgactgcac-3′), MMP-3-sense (5′-gagagcagaagaccgaaagga-3′), MMP-3-anti-sense (5′- cacaacaccacgttatcggg-3′), GAPDH-sense (5′-aggtggtctcctctgacttc-3′), and GAPDH-anti-sense (5′-taccaggaaatgagcttgac-3′).
4.12. MMP-1 and MMP-3 Flow Cytometry
Antibodies against MMP-1 (IC9011P) and MMP-3 (IC513P) were procured from R & D Systems Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA). The expression of MMP-1 and MMP-3 proteins was determined by means of flow cytometry using the PE-conjugated anit-MMP-1 and MMP-3. Isotype control is Mouse IgG1 PE-conjugated Antibody (IC002P, 5 µL/105 cells). Briefly, HDFs were fixed and permeabilized using the FIX & PERM Cell Permeabilization Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA). Thereafter, HDFs were incubated with the anti-MMP-1 (5 µL/105 cells) and MMP-3 antibody (5 µL/105 cells). Finally, the HDFs were analyzed for MMP-1 and MMP-3 protein expression using the Flow Cytometer Cytomics FC 500 (Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA, USA).
4.13. Western Blotting Analysis
HDFs were harvested and split with M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad protein assay kits (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Cell lysates were separated using 7–12% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were then electrotransferred onto a PVDF membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). After blocking with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, the PVDF membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: Anti-p16 (1:500, #92803), anti-p21 (1:500, #2947), anti-p-p53 (1:500, #9286), anti-p53 (1:500, #2524) and anti-β-tubulin (1:1000, #2144) (Cell Signaling, Waltham, MA, USA). After washing three times for 10 min with Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20 (TBST), the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (antirabbit IgG (1:1000, #7074), antimouse IgG (1:1000, #7076), Cell Signaling, Waltham, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The protein bands were detected using an enhanced Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA) and quantified as the ratio of the intensity of the band to the intensity of the α-tubulin band. Quantification was performed using an ImageQuant 350 analyzer (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA).
4.14. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
To examine whether ES-GNPs affected the secretion of MMP-1 and MMP-3, an ELISA was performed. The levels of MMP-1 (# EHMMP1) and MMP-3 (# BMS2014-3) in the supernatant were detected by commercial ELISA kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Miami, OK, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, followed by absorbance detection at 450 nm using a full wavelength microplate reader.
4.15. Statistical Analysis
All data are represented as means ± SEM of three independent replicates for each group. Comparisons were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc. Released 2008. SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc). Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to evaluate the differences among groups. A p-value of <0.01 or <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
5. Conclusions
The Ecklonia stolonifera extract can serve as a metal nanoparticle reducing agent due to the presence of many phlorotannins, phenolic compounds, terpenoids, steroids, and vitamins that can be used during the reduction, capsulation, and stabilization of ES-GNPs. This fact was confirmed in the case of ES-GNPs by UV-vis spectra, DLS, HR-TEM, EDS, XRD, and FT-IR. ES-GNPs. ES-GNPs exhibit effective photocatalysis by degrading methylene blue and rhodamine B. Our study demonstrated that ES-GNPs protected HDFs from UVA irradiation-induced cellular senescence by inhibiting the SA-β-galactosidase activity, reducing intracellular ROS production, lysosome content, and inhibiting G1 arrest and senescence related proteins. Additionally, these anticellular senescence effects can be mediated via the inhibition of MMP-1/-3 expression and secretion. Considering the biological functions of ES-GNPs, we speculate that ES-GNPs could serve as potential candidates for the treatment of skin-photoaging.