Next Article in Journal
Shallow Hydrothermal Vent Bacteria and Their Secondary Metabolites with a Particular Focus on Bacillus
Next Article in Special Issue
Marine-Derived Indole Alkaloids and Their Biological and Pharmacological Activities
Previous Article in Journal
A Collagen Basketweave from the Giant Squid Mantle as a Robust Scaffold for Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diterpenoids from the Brown Alga Rugulopteryx okamurae and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expanding the Repertoire of Spongian-16-One Derivatives in Australian Nudibranchs of the Genus Goniobranchus and Evaluation of Their Anatomical Distribution

1
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
2
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2021, 19(12), 680; https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120680
Submission received: 25 October 2021 / Revised: 24 November 2021 / Accepted: 25 November 2021 / Published: 29 November 2021

Abstract

:
Extracts of the mantle and viscera of the Indo-Pacific nudibranchs Goniobranchus aureopurpureus and Goniobranchus sp. 1 afforded 11 new diterpenoids (111), all of which possess a tetracyclic spongian-16-one scaffold with extensive oxidation at C-6, C-7, C-11, C-12, C-13, and/or C-20. The structures and relative configuration were investigated by NMR experiments, while X-ray crystallography provided the absolute configuration of 1, including a 2′S configuration for the 2-methylbutanoate substituent located at C-7. Dissection of animal tissue revealed that the mantle and viscera tissues differed in their metabolite composition with diterpenes 111 present in the mantle tissue of the two nudibranch species.

1. Introduction

Spongian diterpenes are bioactive natural products isolated from sponges of the orders Dictyoceratida and Dendroceratida, and nudibranchs (shell-less mollusc) predators [1,2]. The first example of the spongian diterpene scaffold was isoagatholactone, isolated from the Mediterranean sponge Spongia officinalis by Cimino et al., and with the structure and absolute configuration established through chemical correlation with grindelic acid [3]. The metabolites spongian-16-one and spongian-15,16-dione were isolated from the New Zealand sponge Dictyodendrilla cavernosa [4]. The structure of spongian-16-one was determined through exhaustive nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies carried out independently by two groups, those of Kernan et al. [4] and Hambley et al. [5]. Spongian-16-one has also been isolated from several nudibranch species, including Chromodoris obsoleta and exhibits moderate anti-neoplastic activity against L1210 (IC50 = 5.0 µg mL−1) and KB (IC50 = 9.2 µg mL−1) cell lines [6]. In this group of tetracyclic diterpenes, further oxidation is commonly seen at C-7, C-11, C-12, C-13, C-15, C-17, and/or C-20 [7].
The current study, which forms part of our comprehensive study on nudibranchs of the genus Goniobranchus [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], represents the first chemical report on the secondary metabolite profile of the two nudibranch species, Goniobranchus aureopurpureus and Goniobranchus sp. 1 [20], each reassigned from an earlier taxonomic classification as Chromodoris species [21]. The structures and relative configuration of eleven isolated diterpene metabolites were determined by analysis of their two-dimensional NMR spectra as well as where applicable by X-ray crystallography to determine the absolute configuration. Our study also investigated the anatomical location of the terpenes and compared this with the distribution of metabolites in other Goniobranchus species.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Diterpenes from Goniobranchus aureopurpureus

Six specimens of G. aureopurpureus were collected from Nelson Bay (New South Wales, Australia) in March 2016. Specimens were dissected into their mantle and viscera and each body part was finely chopped, extracted with acetone and the extract concentrated under vacuum. The aqueous residues were partitioned with diethyl ether to yield an orange oil from the mantles and a green oil from the visceras. The individual mantle extracts were combined, as were the individual viscera extracts prior to fractionation by silica-flash chromatography. Subsequent normal phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC) yielded terpenes 15. The known compounds macfarlandin E [22], aplyviolene [23], polyrhaphin B [24], shahamin C [25], and secoshahamin [26] were also isolated from the mantle extract, while the viscera provided luffarin-X [27], spongian-16-one [4,5], 7α-acetoxyspongian-16-one [28], polyrhaphin A [24], 15,16-diacetoxyshahamin B [25], and 12-desacetoxypolyrhaphin A [29]. The known terpenes spongian-16-one, 7α-acetoxyspongian-16-one, macfarlandin E, aplyviolene, polyrhaphin B, and secoshahamin were isolated from both tissues. The new spongian diterpenes (15) show varying levels of oxidation, particularly at positions C-6, C-7, C-13 and C-20 (Figure 1).
Metabolite 1 was isolated as a colourless oil and displayed a sodiated ion at m/z 501.2829 [M + Na]+ from high-resolution electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) for C27H42O7. These data indicated an additional seven carbons and five oxygens when compared to spongian-16-one. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1 and Table 2; see Supplementary Material) also supported a substituted spongian-16-one skeleton [4,5] but with a methyl singlet at δH 2.04 and a triplet signal at δH 4.85, suggesting additional functionality, namely an acetate group and substitution at C-7, respectively. Doublet and triplet signals at δH 1.15 (J = 6.9 Hz) and δH 0.89 (J = 7.4 Hz), respectively, were attributed to the methyl groups of a 2-methylbutanoate ester, accounting for the remaining five carbon atoms, with gCOSY and HSQC data further validating the CH3(CH3CH2)CH- substructure. Signals for three ester carbonyls (δC 169.7, 174.0, and 175.4) validated six of the oxygen atoms present in the molecular formula. HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 4.85 (H-7, t, J = 2.8 Hz) and 1.15 (7-OCOCHCH3CH2CH3, d) to the signal at δC 175.4 confirmed the 2-methylbutanoate group at C-7. Noting that the J values of H-14 (δH 2.92, dd, J = 1.5, 6.5 Hz) for 1 were different from those observed in spongian-16-one (Kernan et al.: 2.07, dd, J = 5.0, 8.0 Hz; Hambley et al.: 2.09, dd, J = 5.4, 8.0 Hz ) [4,5], HMBC correlations from H-12eq (δH 2.28), H-14 (δH 2.92) and H-15ax (δH 4.20), as well as the signals at δH 2.04 (13-OCOCH3) and 2.92 (H-14) to the signal at δC 81.1 (C-13), located the acetate group at C-13. The signal for Me-20 of spongian-16-one [4,5] was replaced by signals for an oxymethylene H2-20 (δH 4.05 and δH 3.92) in 1. These proton chemical shifts were inconsistent with esterification at C-20 [7,30]; therefore, a hydroxy group was located at C-20, identifying the final oxygen atom. NOESY correlations observed between H-7/Me-17 and H2-20/Me-17 confirmed the same relative configuration as spongian-16-one; however, the configuration of the acetate at C-13 and the 2′-methyl in the 2-methylbutanoate substituent could not be determined by NMR methods. Metabolite 1 was crystallized from 10% EtOAc/hexanes, producing small needle-shaped crystals which were suitable for diffraction. The resulting crystal structure obtained established the overall relative configuration. The absolute configuration was assigned as 5S, 7R, 8R, 9R, 10R, 13S, 14R, 2′S; within naturally-occurring 2-alkylalkanoic acid derivatives, the 2′S configuration is favoured [31]. In 1, the cyclohexane rings A, B, and C each adopt a chair conformation. As a result, adjacent molecules interact through hydrogen bonds O(7)H•••O(4) = 2.17 Å, 167°, resulting in the formation of an undulating one-dimensional polymeric chain that extends down parallel to the crystallographic a-axis (Figure 2). The name of compound 1 was assigned as (-)-13-acetoxy-20-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate.
Diterpene 2 was isolated as a colourless oil and found to have the same C27H42O7 molecular formula as 1 inferred from HRESIMS (m/z 501.2824 [M + Na]+). Examination of the 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1 and Table 2) revealed similar signals to those of 1, including a methyl doublet at δH 1.15 (J = 6.9 Hz) and a methyl triplet at δH 0.91 (J = 7.4 Hz) for the methyl groups of a 2-methylbutanoate ester; there was also an acetate methyl singlet at δH 2.03. HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 4.87 (H-7, d, J = 3.2 Hz) and 1.15 (7-OCOCHCH3CH2CH3, d) to the signal at δC 174.9 confirmed the 2-methylbutanoate group at C-7. The configuration of the 2′-methyl in the ester sidechain could not be established further, owing to the small sample size, but was selected as identical to that in 1 on biogenetic considerations. HMBC correlations from H-20a (δH 4.79) and H-20b (δH 4.73) to the signal at δC 170.6 confirmed the position of the acetoxy group at C-20; there were NOESY correlations between H2-20/Me-17 and H-20b/Me-19. The doublet appearance of H-7 (J = 3.2 Hz) was initially considered consistent with an equatorial OH group at C-6; however, the signal for H-5 was a broadened singlet rather than the doublet with a large J value anticipated if H-6 was axial, (cf. aplyroseol-19 from Chromodoris reticulata [33]). The NOESY correlation between H-6/Me-18 supported an equatorial H-6, while the absence of an NOE between H-6 and Me-17, although not diagnostic, was also consistent with the changed configuration at C-6 compared to that in aplyroseol-19 [33]. The NOESY correlation between H-7/Me-17 placed the C-7 ester substituent on the opposite face to Me-17. Compound 2 was assigned the systematic name (-)-20-acetoxy-6β-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate.
Metabolite 3, also isolated as a colourless oil, displayed an adduct ion at m/z 443.2779 [M + Na]+ in HRESIMS analysis, which established the molecular formula as C25H40O5 with an additional five carbons and three oxygens compared with spongian-16-one. Due to the small sample quantity (<0.1 mg), a Shigemi tube was employed to increase the sensitivity of NMR signal detection [34]. The spectroscopic data again revealed a 2-methylbutanoate moiety, located at C-7 from the identical HMBC correlations for H-7 to those in 1 and 2. NOESY data could not be obtained, but the similar appearance of the signals for H-6 (δH 4.18, br s) and H-7 (δH 4.84, J = 2.6 Hz) compared to 2 established the axial hydroxy group at C-6 and the equatorial ester group at C-7. The 7.8 Hz coupling between H-13 and H-14 assigned the cis C/D ring junction. The name of compound 3 was assigned as (-)-6β-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate.
Diterpene 4, a colourless oil, exhibited an adduct ion at m/z 501.2831 [M + Na]+ in the HRESIMS, corresponding to a molecular formula of C27H42O7, which was the same molecular formula observed for 1 and 2. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data revealed an acetate methyl singlet at δH 2.04 as well as oxymethylene signals at δH 4.04 (d, J = 11.8 Hz) and 3.91 (d, J = 11.8 Hz) for H2-20, similar to comparable signals for 1, and suggesting a C-20 hydroxy group. The major difference compared to the data for 1 was the presence of two methyl doublets at δH 0.95 (d, J = 6.6 Hz) and 0.96 (d, J = 6.6 Hz) suggesting a 3-methylbutanoate substituent. There were gCOSY correlations from the H-3′ methine (δH 2.11, m) to both Me-4′ and Me-5′ and H2-2′ (δH 2.22, m, 2H). HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 4.86 (H-7, t, J = 2.6 Hz), 2.11 (7-OCOCH2CH(CH3)2, m, H-3′) and the methylene signals at δH 2.22 (7-OCOCH2CH(CH3)2, m, H2-2′) to the carbon at δC 171.9 confirmed the 3-methylbutanoate group was attached at C-7. These 1H chemical shifts and HMBC correlations were comparable to those of 7α-11α-dioxyspongian-16-one-7α-isopentanoate-11α-propionate [7]. The similarity of the signal pattern and chemical shift of H-14 (δH 2.91, dd, J = 1.2, 6.3 Hz) to that in 1, together with HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 2.04 (13-OCOCH3) and 2.91 (H-14) to the carbon at δC 81.0 (C-13) confirmed an acetate group at C-13. NOESY correlations determined the relative configuration of C-7 and C-10 to be identical to those of 1 and 2. X-ray studies (See Supplementary Materials) supported the configuration of C-13 to be the same as in 1. Compound 4 was assigned the name (-)-13-acetoxy-20-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(3-methyl)-butanoate.
Diterpene 5 was isolated as a colourless oil and displayed a sodiated molecular ion peak by HRESIMS at m/z 401.2293 [M + Na]+, corresponding to a molecular formula of C22H34O5. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (Table 1 and Table 2) showed an acetoxy methyl singlet at δH 2.09 and associated carbonyl signal at δC 169.7, comparable to those in the NMR data of 7α-acetoxyspongian-16-one [28]. HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 2.09 and 4.84 (H-7, d, J = 3.1 Hz) to the carbonyl at δC 169.7 confirmed the position of the acetoxy group at C-7. The doublet appearance of H-7 suggested hydroxy substitution at C-6. The relative configuration of 5 was identical to that of 2 from the NOESY correlations between H-6/Me-18, H-7/Me-17, H-5/H-9, and H-9/H-14. Compound 5 was assigned the systematic name (-)-7α-acetoxy-6β-hydroxyspongian-16-one.

2.2. Diterpenes from Goniobranchus sp. 1

Three specimens of Goniobranchus sp. 1 were collected from Mudjimba and Gneerings Reefs, South East Queensland, Australia. The extraction and chemical profile of the metabolites from the mantle and viscera tissue were carried out based on the previously described procedures. A total of fifteen spongian diterpene metabolites were isolated from Goniobranchus sp 1, including the new spongian-16-one analogues 6–11. From the mantle isoagatholactone [3], 12α-acetoxyspongian-16-one [30], 20-acetoxyspongian-16-one [30], 20-oxyspongian-16-one-propionate [30], 12α,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-dipropionate [30], 12α,20-diacetoxyspongian-16-one [7], 12α-acetoxy-20-oxyspongian-16-one-20-propionate [7], 20-acetoxy-12α-oxyspongian-16-one-12α-propionate (6), 20-acetoxy-13-hydroxyspongian-16-one (7), 12-hydroxyspongian-16-one (8), 12-hydroxy-20-oxyspongian-16-one-20-propionate (9), 12-hydroxy-11,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-11,20-dipropionate (10), and 11-hydroxy-12,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-12,20-dipropionate (11) were also isolated, while the viscera contained spongian-16-one [4,5] and 7α-acetoxyspongian-16-one [28]. The known metabolites isoagatholactone, 12α-acetoxyspongian-16-one [30], 20-acetoxyspongian-16-one [30], and 12α-acetoxy,20-oxyspongian-16-one-20-propionate [7] were isolated from both tissues. The new compounds (6–11) demonstrate a high level of oxidation, in particular at positions C-11, C-12, C-13 and/or C-20 (Figure 3).
Diterpene 6 was obtained as a colourless oil from NP-HPLC and exhibited a sodiated molecular ion peak in the HRESIMS at m/z 457.2566 [M + Na]+ (C25H38O6). The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data (Table 3 and Table 4) indicated an acetate group (δH 2.03, δC 21.2, 170.8) while a quartet (2H) at δH 2.33, a triplet at δH 1.16 and a carbonyl resonance at δC 173.0 were assigned to a propionate group. The NMR data of 6 were found to be similar to those of 12α-acetoxy-20-oxyspongian-16-one-20-propionate; however, there were some obvious differences in the location of substituents [7]. Oxymethylene signals at δH 4.56 (d) and 4.13 (m) corresponded to those of H2-20 in 20-acetoxyspongian-16-one [30]. These two signals, plus the acetate methyl signal at δH 2.03 (s), all correlated to the carbon signal at δC 170.8 and C-10 (δC 39.8), confirming the position of an acetate group at C-20. The chemical shift values, in particular those of H2-11 and H-13, as well as C-12, were comparable to those in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 12α,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-dipropionate [30] thereby establishing the propionate group at C-12. NOESY correlations between H-5/H-9, H-9/H-14, Hb-20/Me-17, H-20a/Me-19 and H-12/Me-17 placed H-12 and H2-20 on the same face as Me-17. Compound 6 was named (-)-20-acetoxy-12α-oxyspongian-16-one-12α-propionate.
Metabolite 7, which was isolated as a colourless oil, exhibited an adduct ion at m/z 401.2291 [M + Na]+ from HRESIMS, which corresponded to the same molecular formula as 5. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data again revealed an acetate group (δH 2.02, δC 21.2, 170.8) while oxymethylene signals at δH 4.55 (d, J = 13.1 Hz) and 4.14 (d, J = 13.1 Hz) were consistent with those of H2-20 in 6. HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 4.55 and 4.14 as well as from δH 2.02 to the carbon at δC 170.8 and to C-10 (δC 40.4) confirmed the position of the acetate group at C-20. NOE correlations between H-20a/Me-19 and H-20b/Me-17 again placed the C-20 acetate on the same face as Me-17. The upfield chemical shift for H-14 (δH 1.94, dd, J = 5.6, 7.8 Hz), together with HMBC correlations from signals at δH 1.94 (H-14) and 4.13 (H-15ax) to the quaternary carbon at δC 83.7 (C-13), confirmed a hydroxy group at C-13. The configuration at C-13 was not explored further, owing to the small quantity (0.2 mg) of the sample, and was provisionally assigned by comparison with 1 and 3. NOESY correlations between H-5/H-9 and H-9/H-14 confirmed the remaining stereochemistry. Compound 7 was assigned the systematic name (-)-20-acetoxy-13-hydroxyspongian-16-one.
Metabolite 8 was isolated as a colourless oil and displayed a sodiated ion at m/z 343.2245 [M + Na]+ from HRESIMS for C20H32O3 suggesting an extra hydroxy group compared to spongian-16-one. gCOSY correlations from the oxygenated methine proton signal at δH 4.52 (H-12, br s) to δH 1.63 (H2-11) and 2.66 (H-13) established the hydroxy group at the C-12 position, further confirmed by HMBC correlations. NOESY correlations observed between H-5/H-9, H-9/H-14, and H-12/Me-17 confirmed the overall stereochemistry. Compound 8 was named as (-)-12α-hydroxyspongian-16-one.
Diterpene 9 was isolated as a colourless oil and produced an adduct ion at m/z 415.2458 [M+Na]+ from HRESIMS for C23H36O5. The 1H NMR spectrum indicated a quartet (2H) at δH 2.31 and a triplet at δH 1.13, corresponding to propionate methylene and methyl signals. Oxymethylene signals at δH 4.59 (d, J = 12.1 Hz) and 4.17 (d, J = 12.1 Hz) corresponded to those of H2-20 in 20-oxyspongian-16-one-propionate [30]. HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 4.59 and 4.17, as well as from δH 2.31 (2H) and 1.13 to the carbon at δC 174.5 and C-10 (δC 40.2) confirmed the propionate group at C-20. The signals at δH 4.49 (H-12, br s) and 2.65 (H-13) were comparable to those in the 1H NMR spectrum of 8, positioning a hydroxy group at C-12. NOE correlations between Me-17, H-12 and H2-20 positioned the propionate group on the same face and the 12-OH on the opposite face to Me-17. The name of compound 9 was assigned as (-)-12α-hydroxy-20-oxyspongian-16-one-20-propionate.
Metabolite 10, a colourless oil, exhibited an adduct ion at m/z 487.2668 [M + Na]+ in the HRESIMS, corresponding to a molecular formula of C26H40O7, and 16 mass units larger than that of 12α, 20-dioxyspongian-16-one-dipropionate [30]. The 1H NMR spectrum revealed two multiplets at δH 2.34 (2H) and 2.46 (2H) and two methyl triplets at δH 1.15 (J = 7.7 Hz) and 1.18 (J = 7.7 Hz). The addition of two ester carbonyls (δC 173.6 and 174.2) and the lactone carbonyl (δC 180.3) located six of the oxygen atoms, with the seventh oxygen atom inferred to be an additional hydroxy group. Oxymethylene signals at δH 4.74 (d, J = 12.0 Hz) and 3.96 (dd, J = 1.9, 12.0 Hz) corresponded to those of H2-20 in 9 and 20-oxyspongian-16-one-propionate [30]. HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 4.74 and 3.96 as well as from the signals at δH 2.46 (2H) and 1.18 to the carbon at δC 174.2 and to C-10 (δC 41.2) confirmed a propionate group at C-20. The multiplicity of the H-9 signal at δH 1.35 was a doublet rather than the doublet of doublets observed for 8. HMBC correlations from H-11 (δH 5.95) and 11-OCOCH2CH3H 2.34 and 1.15) to the propionate carbonyl at δC 173.6 located the second propionate group at C-11. gCOSY correlations from H-11 and H-13 (δH 2.84) to H-12 (δH 2.79) confirmed the hydroxy group at C-12. The 9.4 Hz coupling between H-12ax and H-13 established a boat conformation for ring C [7]. NOESY correlations observed between H-5/H-9, H-9/H-14, H-20b/Me-17, and H-12/Me-17 confirmed the overall stereochemistry. Compound 10 was named systematically as (-)-12α-hydroxy-11β,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-11β,20-dipropionate.
The spongian-16-one analogue 11 was isolated as a colourless oil and produced an adduct ion at m/z 487.2667 [M + Na]+, giving the same molecular formula as 10, implying two propionate groups and a hydroxy group. The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data revealed signals for two propionate groups. Similar to 10, two ester carbonyls (δC 172.6 and 175.5) and a lactone carbonyl (δC 178.2) were identified. HMBC correlations from the signals at δH 4.61 (d, J = 12.2 Hz) and 4.02 (dd, J = 1.8, 12.2 Hz) as well as from δH 2.50, 2.45 and 1.12 to the carbon at δC 175.5 and C-10 (δC 40.7) confirmed a propionate group at C-20. HMBC correlations from the signal at δH 5.54 (H-12, dd, J = 3.0, 9.2 Hz) to the signal at δC 172.6 located the second propionate group at C-12. Lastly, the occurrence of a signal at δH 1.34 (d, J = 3.0 Hz) for H-9, together with gCOSY correlations from H-12 and H-9 to H-11 (δH 4.46), established a hydroxy group at C-11. The 9.2 Hz coupling between H-12ax and H-13 again established a boat conformation for ring C [7]. The NOESY correlations observed between H-5/H-9, H-9/H-14, H-20b/Me-17, and H-12/Me-17 confirmed the overall stereochemistry. Compound 11 was named as (-)-11β-hydroxy-12α,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-12α,20-dipropionate.

2.3. Anatomical Distribution of Metabolites

Comparison of individual body parts by 1H NMR spectroscopy, together with subsequent isolation work, revealed that new metabolites 15 were solely isolated from the mantle tissue of G. aureopurpureus. Likewise, new metabolites 611 were isolated only from the mantle tissue of Goniobranchus sp. 1. We also found that both species had more chemical diversity of metabolites in the mantle relative to the viscera. A full list of metabolites found in each body part is provided in the Supplementary Material. This pattern of anatomical distribution matches that of four Goniobranchus species that we previously studied (G. tinctorius, G. tasmaniensis, G. collingwoodi, and G. splendidus) [7,35]. These species may accumulate compounds in the mantle as they feed on a variety of sponge species with different chemistry. Compounds in the mantle are thought to be used for defensive purposes, and complex defensive mixtures may provide protection from a range of predators [10]. In contrast, we previously found two species (G. hunterae and G. verrieri) with the same metabolites in the mantle and viscera tissue, and one species (G. daphne) with fewer compounds in the mantle compared to the viscera [35].

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, the isolation work was conducted on two Goniobranchus species and afforded eleven new spongian diterpenes with oxidation at various positions, such as C-6, C-7, C-11, C-12, C-13, and/or C-20. The X-ray structure of 1 provided insight into the absolute configuration of the parent spongian-16-one [4,5]. Many of these highly oxygenated spongian diterpenes were only isolated from the mantle tissue, where they may play a role in deterring predators.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General Experimental Procedure

Specific rotations were measured at 23 °C on a Jasco P-2000 polarimeter for solutions in CHCl3 using a 1-millilitre cell (10-centimetre path length). NMR spectroscopic data were recorded on a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer using a 5-millimetre SEI probe or a Bruker Avance DRX 700 MHz spectrometer with a 5-millimetre TXI Zgrad probe for solutions in CDCl3 at 298K. Heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) data were acquired using a 1JC-H of 145 Hz, while HMBC spectra were acquired using nJC-H of 8 Hz. Positive and negative ion electrospray mass spectra were determined using either a Bruker Esquire HCT 3D ion trap instrument for low-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LRESIMS) or a MicrOTOF-Q or an Orbitrap Elite instrument for high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) with MeOH as solvent. Normal–phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC) was undertaken using a Waters 515 pump connected to a Gilson 132 series refractive index detector with a Phenomenex Luna (5 μm, 10 × 250 mm) column, using isocratic elution conditions at flow rates between 1–2 mL/ min. Silica gel 60 G and silica TLC plates F254 were purchased from Merck. Solvents were either distilled or were HPLC grade.

4.2. Biological Material

Six individuals of Goniobranchus aureopurpureus were collected from Nelson Bay (#1469-1474), New South Wales in March 2016. Three individuals of Goniobranchus (Chromodoris) sp. 1 were collected from Mudjimba (#1368 and #1563) and Gneerings Reefs (#1575) (Mooloolaba, Queensland) in October 2015 and October 2016. All collections were stored in individual containers at −20 °C until dissection into mantle and gut prior to extraction.

4.3. Extraction and Purification

The mantle and viscera tissue of each specimen of G. aureopurpureus and G. sp 1 were extracted in acetone (3 × 2 mL) and sonicated (5 min) separately. The extracts were reduced to aqueous suspensions, extracted with Et2O (3 × 3 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under N2 to give an orange oil (mantle tissue) or a green oil (viscera). The 1H NMR profile of the mantle and viscera extracts were compared between the specimens of each species and showed similar chemistry; for G. aureopurpureus (specimens #1469-1474) the mantle extracts were combined (51.9 mg) and the viscera extracts combined (56.1 mg) to produce two extracts. For G. sp 1 (specimens #1563, 1368 and 1575), the mantle extracts were combined (96.8 mg), as were the viscera extracts (71.2 mg). The extracts were further separated by NP-flash column chromatography with a stepwise solvent gradient from 100% hexanes to 100% MeOH.
Mantle fractions of G. aureopurpureus were further separated by NP-HPLC (25–30% EtOAc in hexanes) to yield 15-desacetoxy-12-acetoxydendrillolide A (0.4 mg), spongian-16-one (2.5 mg), macfarlandin E (1.8 mg), aplyviolene (1.6 mg), 7α-acetoxyspongian-16-one (0.6 mg), polyrhaphin B (0.1 mg), secoshahamin (0.1 mg), shahamin C (0.1 mg), 7α-acetoxy-6β-hydroxyspongian-16-one (5: 0.22 mg), 13-acetoxy-20-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate (1: 1.2 mg), 6β-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate (3: 0.06 mg), 20-acetoxy-6β-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate (2: 0.07 mg), and 13-acetoxy-20-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(3-methyl)-butanoate (4: 0.8 mg). Viscera fractions of G. aureopurpureus were further separated by NP-HPLC (25-30% EtOAc in hexanes) to yield luffarin-X (0.22 mg), spongian-16-one (0.43 mg) macfarlandin E (0.46 mg), polyrhaphin B (0.1 mg), secoshahamin (0.12 mg), polyrhaphin A (0.32 mg), 12-desacetoxypolyrhaphin A (0.14 mg), 15,16-diacetoxyshahamin B (0.14 mg), aplyviolene (0.79 mg), and 7α-acetoxyspongian-16-one (0.44 mg).
The NP-flash column chromatography mantle fractions of Goniobranchus sp 1 were separated by NP-HPLC (30% EtOAc in hexanes) to provide isoagatholactone (0.5 mg), 12α-acetoxyspongian-16-one (0.23 mg), 20-acetoxyspongian-16-one (7.94 mg), 20-oxyspongian-16-one-propionate (0.35 mg), 12α,20-diacetoxyspongian-16-one (0.43 mg), 12α,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-dipropionate (1.30 mg), 12α-acetoxy-20-oxyspongian-16-one-20-propionate (0.28 mg), 20-acetoxy-12α-oxyspongian-16-one-12α-propionate (6: 0.21 mg), and 20-acetoxy-13-hydroxyspongian-16-one (7: 0.17 mg). Mantle fractions eluting from DCM/EtOAc 4:1 and 1:1 were separated by NP-HPLC (30% EtOAc in hexanes) to yield 12-hydroxyspongian-16-one (8: 0.08 mg), 12-hydroxy-20-oxyspongian-16-one-20-propionate (9: 0.97 mg), 12-hydroxy-11,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-11,20-dipropionate (10: 0.17 mg), and 11-hydroxy-12,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-12,20-dipropionate (11: 0.11 mg). Viscera fractions eluting from hexanes/DCM (1:1 and 1:4), 100% DCM and DCM/EtOAc 4:1 were combined and separated by NP-HPLC (30% EtOAc in hexanes), providing isoagatholactone (0.16 mg), spongian-16-one (2.59 mg), 7α-acetoxyspongian-16-one (0.57 mg), 12α-acetoxyspongian-16-one (1.01 mg), 20-acetoxyspongian-16-one (0.30 mg), and 12α,20-diacetoxyspongian-16-one (0.83 mg).
(–)-13-Acetoxy-20-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate (1): colourless oil (1.2 mg); [ α ] D 21 –12 (c 0.12, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 1 and Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 501.2829 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C27H42NaO7, 501.2823).
(–)-20-Acetoxy-6β-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate (2): colourless oil (0.07 mg); [ α ] D 21 –71 (c 0.007, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 1 and Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 501.2824 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C27H42NaO7, 501.2823).
(–)-6β-Hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate (3): colourless oil (0.06 mg); [ α ] D 21 –167 (c 0.006, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 1 and Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 443.2779 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C25H40NaO5, 443.2768).
(–)-13-Acetoxy-20-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(3-methyl)-butanoate (4): colourless oil (0.8 mg); [ α ] D 21 –19 (c 0.08, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 1 and Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 501.2831 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C27H42NaO7, 501.2823).
(–)-7α-Acetoxy-6β-hydroxyspongian-16-one (5): colourless oil (0.22 mg); [ α ] D 21 –65 (c 0.022, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 1 and Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 401.2293 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C22H34NaO5, 401.2298).
(–)-20-Acetoxy-12α-oxyspongian-16-one-12α-propionate (6): colourless oil (0.21 mg); [ α ] D 21 –29 (c 0.021, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 3 and Table 4; HRESIMS m/z 457.2566 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C25H38NaO6, 457.2561).
(–)-20-Acetoxy-13-hydroxyspongian-16-one (7): colourless oil (0.17 mg); [ α ] D 21 –22 (c 0.017, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 3 and Table 4; HRESIMS m/z 401.2291 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C22H34NaO5, 401.2298).
(–)-12-Hydroxyspongian-16-one (8): colourless oil (0.08 mg); [ α ] D 21 –58 (c 0.01, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz), Table 3 and Table 4; HRESIMS m/z 343.2245 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C20H32NaO3, 343.2244).
(–)-12-Hydroxy-20-oxyspongian-16-one-20-propionate (9): colourless oil (0.97 mg); [ α ] D 21 –7 (c 0.097, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz), Table 3 and Table 4; HRESIMS m/z 415.2458 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C23H36NaO5, 415.2455).
(–)-12-Hydroxy-11,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-11,20-dipropionate (10): colourless oil (0.17 mg); [ α ] D 21 –35 (c 0.017, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 3 and Table 4; HRESIMS m/z 487.2668 [M + Na]+ (calculatedfor C26H40NaO7, 487.2666).
(–)-11-Hydroxy-12,20-dioxyspongian-16-one-12,20-dipropionate (11): colourless oil (0.11 mg); [ α ] D 21 –64 (c 0.011, CHCl3); 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CDCl3, 700 MHz), Table 3 and Table 4; HRESIMS m/z 487.2667 [M + Na]+ (calculated for C26H40NaO7, 487.2666).

4.4. X-ray Crystallographic Structure Determination

Full details of X-ray crystallography methods and data are available in the Supplementary Materials.
Crystallographic data for 1: C27H42O7 (M =478.60 g/mol): orthorhombic, space group P212121 (no. 19), a = 7.9081(2) Å, b = 11.0710(3) Å, c = 30.2192(8) Å, V = 2645.73(12) Å3, Z = 4, T = 100.01(10) K, μ(MoKα) = 0.085 mm-1, Dcalc = 1.202 g/cm3, 34647 reflections measured (4.562° ≤ 2Θ ≤ 56.56°), 6562 unique (Rint = 0.0495, Rsigma = 0.0347) which were used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0416 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.1191 (all data).
Crystallographic data for4: C27H42O7 (M =478.60 g/mol): orthorhombic, space group P212121 (no. 19), a = 7.9438(3) Å, b = 11.2958(8) Å, c = 28.897(2) Å, V = 2593.0(3) Å3, Z = 4, T = 99.99(10) K, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.087 mm−1, Dcalc = 1.226 g/cm3, 24810 reflections measured (4.578° ≤ 2Θ ≤ 50.246°), 4642 unique (Rint = 0.0727, Rsigma = 0.0429) which were used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0804 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.2256 (all data).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md19120680/s1. Figure S1: An image of G. aureopurpureus and Giniobranchus sp. 1; Figure S2: X-ray crystallography image of diterpene 4; Figures S3–S56: NMR and 2D NMR spectra of diterpenes 111 (1H, COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY). Tables S1 and S2 and Figures S57–S62: Anatomical distribution of metabolites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C.F. and M.J.G.; methodology, L.C.F. and J.K.C.; formal analysis, L.C.F., J.K.C. and M.J.G.; investigation, L.C.F., J.K.C. and M.J.G.; resources, K.L.C. and M.J.G.; data curation, L.C.F.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.F., K.L.C. and M.J.G.; writing—review and editing, L.C.F., K.L.C., J.K.C. and M.J.G.; supervision, K.L.C. and M.J.G.; project administration, M.J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the School of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, The University of Queensland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw NMR data files are available from the authors on request. All other data is contained within this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The assistance of T. Le, G. Pierens (NMR), and Peter Josh (MS) is acknowledged. Specimens were collected under a NSW Department of Primary Industries Scientific Collection Permit (# P16/0052-1.0) and QLD General Fisheries Permits (#161624 and #183990).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gonzalez, M.A. Spongiane diterpenoids. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2007, 3, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Keyzers, R.A.; Northcote, P.T.; Davies-Coleman, M.T. Spongian diterpenoids from marine sponges. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cimino, G.; De Rosa, D.; De Stefano, S.; Minale, L. Isoagatholactone, a diterpene of a new structural type from the sponge Spongia officinalis. Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kernan, M.R.; Cambie, R.C.; Bergquist, P.R. Chemistry of Sponges, IX. New diterpenes from the marine sponge Dictyodendrilla cavernosa. J. Nat. Prod. 1990, 53, 724–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hambley, T.W.; Poiner, A.; Taylor, W.C. The constituents of marine sponges. V. The isolation from Chelonaplysilla violacea (Dendroceratida) of aplyviolene and other diterpenes, and the determination of the crystal structure of aplyviolene. Aust. J. Chem. 1990, 43, 1861–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Miyamoto, T.; Sakamoto, K.; Arao, K.; Komori, T.; Higuchi, R.; Sasaki, T. Dorisenones, cytotoxic spongian diterpenoids, from the nudibranch Chromodoris obsoleta. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 8187–8198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Forster, L.C.; Winters, A.E.; Cheney, K.L.; Dewapriya, P.; Capon, R.J.; Garson, M.J. Spongian-16-one diterpenes and their anatomical distribution in the Australian nudibranch Goniobranchus collingwoodi. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Forster, L.C.; Pierens, G.K.; Clegg, J.K.; Garson, M.J. Dynamic NMR and computational studies inform the conformational description of dendrillane terpenes from the nudibranch Goniobranchus coi. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Forster, L.C.; Pierens, G.K.; Garson, M.J. Elucidation of relative and absolute configurations of highly rearranged diterpenoids and evidence for a putative biosynthetic intermediate from the Australian nudibranch Goniobranchus geometricus. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Winters, A.E.; White, A.M.; Cheney, K.L.; Garson, M.J. Geographic variation in diterpene-based secondary metabolites and level of defence in an aposematic nudibranch, Goniobranchus splendidus. J. Mollusc. Stud. 2019, 85, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dewi, A.S.; Pierens, G.K.; Cheney, K.L.; Blanchfield, J.T.; Garson, M.J. Chromolactol, an oxygenated diterpene from the Indo-Pacific nudibranch Goniobranchus coi: Spectroscopic and computational studies. Aust. J. Chem. 2018, 71, 798–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Winters, A.E.; Wilson, N.G.; van den Berg, C.P.; How, M.J.; Endler, J.A.; Marshall, N.J.; White, A.M.; Garson, M.J.; Cheney, K.L. Toxicity and taste: Unequal chemical defences in a mimicry ring. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 285, 20180457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Forster, L.C.; White, A.M.; Cheney, K.L.; Garson, M.J. Oxygenated terpenes from the Indo-Pacific nudibranchs Goniobranchus splendidus and Goniobranchus collingwoodi. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2018, 13, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Winters, A.E.; Green, N.F.; Wilson, N.G.; How, M.J.; Garson, M.J.; Marshall, N.J.; Cheney, K.L. Stabilizing selection on individual pattern elements of aposematic signals. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 284, 20170926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Forster, L.C.; Pierens, G.K.; White, A.M.; Cheney, K.L.; Dewapriya, P.; Capon, R.J.; Garson, M.J. Cytotoxic spiroepoxide lactone and its putative biosynthetic precursor from Goniobranchus Splendidus. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 2672–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. White, A.M.; Pierens, G.K.; Forster, L.C.; Winters, A.E.; Cheney, K.L.; Garson, M.J. Rearranged diterpenes and norditerpenes from three Australian Goniobranchus mollusks. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. White, A.M.; Dewi, A.S.; Cheney, K.L.; Winters, A.E.; Blanchfield, J.T.; Garson, M.J. Oxygenated diterpenes from the Indo-Pacific nudibranchs Goniobranchus splendidus and Ardeadoris egretta. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hirayama, Y.; Katavic, P.L.; White, A.M.; Pierens, G.K.; Lambert, L.K.; Winters, A.E.; Kigoshi, H.; Kita, M.; Garson, M.J. New cytotoxic norditerpenes from the Australian nudibranchs Goniobranchus Splendidus and Goniobranchus Daphne. Aust. J. Chem. 2016, 69, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mudianta, I.W.; White, A.M.; Garson, M.J. Oxygenated terpenes from Indo-Pacific nudibranchs: Scalarane sesterterpenes from Glossodoris hikuerensis and 12-acetoxy dendrillolide A from Goniobranchus albonares. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 865–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Cobb, G.T.; Willan, R.C. Undersea Jewels: A Colour Guide to Nudibranchs; Australian Govt. Dept. of the Environment and Heritage: Canberra, Australia, 2006.
  21. Johnson, R.F.; Gosliner, T.M. Traditional taxonomic groupings mask evolutionary history: A molecular phylogeny and new classification of the chromodorid nudibranchs. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Molinski, T.F.; Faulkner, D.J.; He, C.H.; Van Duyne, G.D.; Clardy, J. Three new rearranged spongian diterpenes from Chromodoris macfarlandi: Reappraisal of the structures of dendrillolides A and B. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 4564–4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hambley, T.W.; Poiner, A.; Taylor, W.C. Diterpene metabolites of the marine sponge Chelonaplysilla violacea: Aplyviolene and aplyviolacene. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3281–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bobzin, S.C.; Faulkner, D.J. Diterpenes from the marine sponge Aplysilla polyrhaphis and the dorid nudibranch Chromodoris norrisi. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3902–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Carmely, S.; Cojocaru, M.; Loya, Y.; Kashman, Y. Ten new rearranged spongian diterpenes from two Dysidea species. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 4801–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Uddin, M.H.; Hossain, M.K.; Nigar, M.; Roy, M.C.; Tanaka, J. New cytotoxic spongian-class rearranged diterpenes from a marine sponge. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2012, 48, 412–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Butler, M.S.; Capon, R.J. The luffarins (A-Z), novel terpenes from an Australian marine sponge, Luffariella geometrica. Aust. J. Chem. 1992, 45, 1705–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Karuso, P.; Taylor, W.C. The constituents of marine sponges. II. The isolation from Aplysilla rosea (dendroceratida) of (5R*, 7S*, 8R*, 9S*, 10R*, 13S*, 14S*, 15S*)-15, 17-epoxy-17-hydroxy-16-oxospongian-7-yl butyrate (aplyroseol-1) and related diterpenes (aplyroseol-2 to aplyroseol-6). Aust. J. Chem. 1986, 39, 1629–1641. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bobzin, S.C.; Faulkner, D.J. Novel rearranged spongian diterpenes from the Palauan sponge Dendrilla sp.: Reassessment of the structures of dendrillolide A and dendrillolide B. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5727–5731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Katavic, P.L.; Jumaryatno, P.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Blanchfield, J.T.; Garson, M.J. Oxygenated terpenoids from the Australian sponges Coscinoderma matthewsi and Dysidea sp. and the nudibranch Chromodoris albopunctata. Aust. J. Chem. 2012, 65, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rettinger, K.; Karl, V.; Schmarr, H.G.; Dettmar, F.; Hener, U.; Mosandl, A. Chirospecific analysis of 2-alkyl-branched alcohols, acids, and esters: Chirality evaluation of 2-methylbutanoates from apples and pineapples. Phytochem. Anal. 1991, 2, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Farrugia, L. ORTEP-3 for Windows—A version of ORTEP-III with a graphical user interface (GUI). J. Appl. Cryst. 1997, 30 Pt 1, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suciati; Lambert, L.K.; Garson, M.J. Structures and anatomical distribution of oxygenated diterpenes in the Australian nudibranch Chromodoris reticulata. Aust. J. Chem. 2011, 64, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schroeder, F.C.; Gronquist, M. Extending the scope of NMR spectroscopy with microcoil probes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7122–7131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Winters, A.E.; White, A.M.; Dewi, A.S.; Mudianta, I.W.; Wilson, N.G.; Forster, L.C.; Garson, M.J.; Cheney, K.L. Distribution of defensive metabolites in nudibranch molluscs. J. Chem. Ecol. 2018, 44, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of diterpenes 15.
Figure 1. Structures of diterpenes 15.
Marinedrugs 19 00680 g001
Figure 2. Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot (ORTEP) [32] representation of the crystal structure of (5S, 7R, 8R, 9R, 10R, 13S, 14R, 2′S)-13-acetoxy-20-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate (1) shown with 30% probability ellipsoids.
Figure 2. Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid Plot (ORTEP) [32] representation of the crystal structure of (5S, 7R, 8R, 9R, 10R, 13S, 14R, 2′S)-13-acetoxy-20-hydroxy-7α-oxyspongian-16-one-7α-(2-methyl)-butanoate (1) shown with 30% probability ellipsoids.
Marinedrugs 19 00680 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of 6–11.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of 6–11.
Marinedrugs 19 00680 g003
Table 1. 1H NMR assignments for spongian-16-one analogues 1–5a.
Table 1. 1H NMR assignments for spongian-16-one analogues 1–5a.
PositionδH, mult., J (Hz)
1 b2 c3 c,e4 c5 b
1 eq
1ax
2.22, br d (12.5)
0.89, m
2.34, m
0.78, m
1.75, m
0.86, m
2.22, m
0.89, m
1.74, m
0.86, m
2 eq
2ax
1.60, m
1.51, m
1.61, m
1.46, m
1.73, m
1.46, m
1.61, m
1.51, m
1.71, m
1.46, m
3eq
3ax
1.49, m
1.23, m
1.45, m
1.24, m
1.39, m
1.19, m
1.48, m
1.24, m
1.39, m
1.20, m
4-----
51.45, m1.38, br s1.16, 1.50, m1.16, d (2.0)
6eq
6ax
1.81, m
1.63, m
4.17, br s
-
4.18, br s
-
1.81, m
1.63, m
4.19, br s
-
7eq
7ax
4.85, t (2.8)
-
4.87, d (3.2)
-
4.84, d (2.6)
-
4.86, t (2.6)
-
4.84, d (3.1)
-
8-----
91.49, m1.14, m1.05, m1.44, m1.05, dd(2.2, 12.5)
10-----
11eq
11ax
1.92, m
1.89, m
1.80, m
1.58, m
1.58, m
1.47, m
1.88, m
1.88, m
1.57, m
1.45, m
12eq
12ax
2.28, dt(13.9, 5.8)
2.02, m
2.31, m
1.55, m
2.32, m
1.60, m
2.32, dt(14.1, 5.6)
1.99, m
2.32, m
1.60, m
13-2.57, t (7.9)2.57, t (7.8)-2.60, t (8.2)
142.92, dd (1.5, 6.5)2.49, m2.44, dd (5.6, 7.8)2.91, dd (1.2, 6.3)2.43, dd (5.6, 8.2)
15eq
15ax
4.22, dd (6.5, 9.9)
4.20, dd(1.5, 9.9)
4.25, d (10.2)
3.94, dd (5.5, 10.2)
4.27, d (10.1)
3.95, dd (5.6, 10.1)
4.25, dd (6.3, 9.9)
4.20, dd (1.2, 9.9)
4.26, d (10.2)
3.98, dd (5.6, 10.2)
16-----
171.10, s1.27, s1.22, s1.09, s1.21, s
18eq0.81, s0.90, s0.90, s0.81, s0.90, s
19ax0.81, s1.18, s1.19, s0.80, s1.19, s
20a
20b
4.05, d (11.8)
3.92, d (11.8)
4.79, m
4.73, m
1.19, s4.04, d (11.8)
3.91, d (11.8)
1.19, s
6-OH-dd-d
7-CO2CH3----2.09, s
7-CO2CH2CH(CH3)2---2.22, m
2.22, m
-
7-CO2CH2CH(CH3)2---2.11, m-
7-CO2CH2CH(CH3)2---0.95, d (6.6)
0.96, d (6.6)
-
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH32.40, m (7.1)2.41, q (6.9)2.45, m--
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH31.15, d (6.9)1.15, d (6.9)1.15, d (7.2)--
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH31.68, dt (13.6, 7.4)
1.48, m
1.68, dt (13.6, 7.4)
1.50, m
1.68, m
1.49, m
--
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH30.89, t (7.4)0.91, t (7.4)0.90, t (7.2)--
13- CO2CH32.04, s--2.04, s-
20-CO2CH3-2.03, s---
20-OHd--d-
a Chemical shifts (ppm) referenced to CHCl3H 7.26, δC 77.16). b At 500 MHz. c At 700 MHz. d Not observed. e Data acquired using a Shigemi NMR tube.
Table 2. 13C NMR assignments for spongian-16-one analogues 1–5a.
Table 2. 13C NMR assignments for spongian-16-one analogues 1–5a.
PositionδC, mult.
1 b 2 c 3 c,d4 c 5 b
134.6, CH236.6, CH242.4, CH234.9, CH242.4, CH2
218.7, CH218.6, CH218.7, CH218.8, CH218.7, CH2
341.7, CH243.4, CH244.1, CH241.7, CH243.9, CH2
432.2, C33.5, C33.7, C32.3, C33.2, C
548.1, CH51.8, CH51.3, CH47.9, CH51.2, CH
623.1, CH269.6, CH70.6, CH23.1, CH270.5, CH
773.4, CH75.2, CH75.7, CH73.6, CH76.1, CH
839.5, C37.9, C37.7, C39.3, C37.7, C
950.1, CH52.4, CH51.9, CH50.3, CH51.8, CH
1039.5, C40.8, C36.8, C41.5, C36.7, C
1118.7, CH219.1, CH217.4, CH218.8, CH217.4, CH2
1227.3, CH222.5, CH221.8, CH227.5, CH222.0, CH2
1381.1, C36.9, CH37.0, CH81.0, CH37.0, CH
1445.9, CH41.9, CH41.6, CH45.9, CH41.9, CH
1566.9, CH267.1, CH267.2, CH266.9, CH267.4, CH2
16174.0, C178.5, C178.9, C173.7, C178.9, C
1716.1, CH315.1, CH315.0, CH315.9, CH314.9, CH3
18eq33.4, CH333.8, CH333.2, CH333.6, CH333.4, CH3
19ax21.8, CH324.6, CH324.3, CH321.9, CH324.5, CH3
2062.1, CH264.1, CH217.6, CH362.1, CH218.0, CH3
- -
7-CO2CH3----169.7, C
7-CO2CH3--- 21.4, CH3
7-CO2CH2CH(CH3)2---171.9, C-
7-CO2CH2CH(CH3)2---44.0, CH2-
7-CO2CH2CH(CH3)2---25.7, CH
7-CO2CH2CH(CH3)2-
-
-
22.5, CH3
22.5, CH3
-
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH3175.4, C174.9, C175.3, C--
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH341.8, CH41.2, CH41.6, CH--
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH316.9, CH316.9, CH316.9, CH3--
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH326.8, CH226.8, CH226.9, CH2--
7-CO2CHCH3CH2CH311.8, CH311.8, CH311.7, CH3--
13-CO2CH3169.7, C--169.6, C-
13-CO2CH321.5, CH3--21.6, CH3-
20-CO2CH3-170.6, C---
20-CO2CH3-21.2, CH3---
a Chemical shifts (ppm) referenced to CHCl3H 7.26, δC 77.16). b At 500 MHz. c At 700 MHz. d Data acquired using a Shigemi NMR tube.
Table 3. 1H NMR assignments for spongian-16-one analogues 611a.
Table 3. 1H NMR assignments for spongian-16-one analogues 611a.
PositionδH, mult., J (Hz)
6 c7 c8 b9 b10 c11 c
1 eq
1ax
2.03, m
0.62, m
2.12, m
0.80, m
1.68, br d (12.8)
0.83, m
2.07, br d (13.2)
0.79, td (13.2, 2.3)
2.03, br d (13.4)
0.75, m
2.02, br d (13.6)
1.15, m
2 eq
2ax
1.54, m
1.43, m
1.56, m
1.45, m
1.61, m
1.42, m
1.57, m
1.46, m
1.61, m
1.47, m
1.62, m
1.50, m
3eq
3ax
1.45, m
1.16, m
1.45, m
1.17, m
1.38, m
1.15, td (13.2, 3.7)
1.45, m
1.19, m
1.45, m
1.16, m
1.45, br d (12.9)
1.18, m
4------
51.03, m1.01, dd (12.4, 2.1)0.89, m1.08, dd (12.3, 1.7)1.05, dd (12.7, 2.4)1.11, m
6eq
6ax
1.57, m
1.40, m
1.56, m
1.38, m
1.55, m
1.35, m
1.58, m
1.39, m
1.66, m
1.45, m
1.63, m
1.49, m
7eq
7ax
1.92, m
1.16, m
1.88, m
1.16, m
1.82, dt (12.8, 3.3)
1.09, dt (12.8, 3.5)
1.91, dt (12.8, 3.3)
1.17, m
1.76, dt (12.6, 3.1)
1.06, m
1.76, dt (12.6, 3.2)
1.06, td (12.6, 3.7)
8------
91.33, m1.04, m1.32, dd (9.1, 6.3)1.51, m1.35, d (2.9)1.34, d (3.0)
10------
11eq
11ax
2.00, m
1.80, dd (13.2, 3.4)
1.88, m
1.49, m
1.63, m
1.63, m
1.87, m
1.85, m
5.95, t (3.4)
-
4.46, t (3.0)
-
12eq
12ax
5.44, br s
-
2.63, m
1.62, m
4.52, br s
-
4.49, br s
-
4.36, m
-
5.54, dd (9.2, 3.0)
-
132.67, dt (8.0, 1.5)-2.66, d (8.0)2.65, d (7.9)2.84, dd (10.9, 9.4)3.00, dd (10.6, 9.2)
142.29, dd (8.0, 5.2)1.94, dd (7.8, 5.6)2.33, dd (8.0, 5.4)2.37, dd (7.9, 5.4)2.44, m2.44, m
15eq
15ax
4.26, d (9.9)
4.12, m
4.42, dd (9.4, 5.6)
4.13, dd (9.4, 7.8)
4.23, d (9.7)
4.11, dd (9.7, 5.4)
4.26, d (9.9)
4.13, dd (9.9, 5.4)
4.33, m
4.33, m
4.28, m
4.28, m
16------
170.90, s0.88, s0.82, s0.89, s0.95, s0.94, s
18eq0.89, s0.89, s0.86, s0.90, s0.87, s0.87, s
19ax0.83, s0.83, s0.81, s0.85, s0.81, s0.82, s
20a
20b
4.56, d (12.4)
4.13, m
4.55, d (13.1)
4.14, d (13.1)
0.82, s4.59, d (12.1)
4.17, d (12.1)
4.74, d (12.0)
3.96, dd (12.0, 1.9)
4.61, d (12.2)
4.02, dd (12.2, 1.8)
11-OH-----2.08, br s
11-CO2CH2CH3----2.34, m
2.34, m
-
11-CO2CH2CH3----1.15, t (7.7)-
12-OH--dd2.79, br s-
12-OCOCH3------
12-CO2CH2CH32.33, q (7.6)
2.33, q (7.6)
----2.46, m
2.40, m
12-CO2CH2CH31.16, t (7.7)----1.18, t (7.6)
13-OH-d----
20-OCOCH32.03, s2.02, s----
20-CO2CH2CH3---2.31, q (7.7)
2.31, q (7.7)
2.46, m
2.46, m
2.50, m
2.45, m
20-CO2CH2CH3---1.13, t (7.7)1.18, t (7.7)1.12, t (7.5)
a Chemical shifts (ppm) referenced to CHCl3H 7.26, δC 77.16). b At 500 MHz. c At 700 MHz. d Not observed.
Table 4. 13C NMR assignments for spongian-16-one analogues 6–11a.
Table 4. 13C NMR assignments for spongian-16-one analogues 6–11a.
PositionδC, mult.
6 c7 c8 b9 b10 c11 c
135.1, CH235.4, CH239.9, CH235.1, CH233.8, CH233.8, CH2
218.3, CH218.5, CH218.5, CH218.4, CH218.2, CH218.2, CH2
341.5, CH241.6, CH242.1, CH241.7, CH241.3, CH241.5, CH2
432.8, C33.0, C33.1, C33.1, C33.0, C32.9, C
557.1, CH57.0, CH56.8, CH56.9, CH58.0, CH58.2, CH
617.8, CH217.9, CH218.1, CH217.9, CH217.6, CH218.1, CH2
742.2, CH242.8, CH242.0, CH242.2, CH242.1, CH241.9, CH2
835.6, C36.3, C35.5, C36.0, C35.1, C33.2, C
950.0, CH56.7, CH48.8, CH49.0, CH62.6, CH64.2, CH
1039.8, C40.4, C36.1, C40.2, C41.2, C40.7, C
1125.6, CH219.4, CH227.1, CH229.2, CH270.4, CH67.7, CH
1267.9, CH28.1, CH265.1, CH64.9, CH66.4, CH69.5, CH
1343.1, CH83.7, C45.5, CH45.6, CH41.6, CH38.7, CH
1449.1, CH54.5, CH48.3, CH48.6, CH47.6, CH47.7, CH
1567.7, CH267.1, CH267.9, CH268.0, CH267.7, CH266.9, CH2
16174.9, C173.6, C176.3, C176.4, C180.3, C178.2, C
1715.3, CH315.5, CH315.4, CH315.2, CH317.7, CH317.6, CH3
18eq33.9, CH333.9, CH333.5, CH333.9, CH333.6, CH333.6, CH3
19ax22.1, CH322.0, CH321.6, CH321.9, CH321.9, CH321.7, CH3
2064.3, CH264.3, CH216.5, CH364.5, CH264.4, CH264.7, CH2
11-CO2CH2CH3----173.6, C-
11-CO2CH2CH3----27.9, CH2-
11-CO2CH2CH3----9.2, CH3-
12-CO2CH2CH3173.0, C--174.5, C-172.6, C
12-CO2CH2CH328.0, CH2--27.9, CH2-27.7, CH2
12-CO2CH2CH39.4, CH3--9.3, CH3-9.1, CH3
20-CO2CH3170.8, C170.8, C----
20-CO2CH321.2, CH321.2, CH3----
20-CO2CH2CH3----174.2, C175.5, C
20-CO2CH2CH3----27.6, CH227.4, CH2
20-CO2CH2CH3----9.0, CH39.4, CH3
a Chemical shifts (ppm) referenced to CHCl3H 7.26, δC 77.16). b At 500 MHz. c At 700 MHz.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Forster, L.C.; Clegg, J.K.; Cheney, K.L.; Garson, M.J. Expanding the Repertoire of Spongian-16-One Derivatives in Australian Nudibranchs of the Genus Goniobranchus and Evaluation of Their Anatomical Distribution. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120680

AMA Style

Forster LC, Clegg JK, Cheney KL, Garson MJ. Expanding the Repertoire of Spongian-16-One Derivatives in Australian Nudibranchs of the Genus Goniobranchus and Evaluation of Their Anatomical Distribution. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(12):680. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Forster, Louise C., Jack K. Clegg, Karen L. Cheney, and Mary J. Garson. 2021. "Expanding the Repertoire of Spongian-16-One Derivatives in Australian Nudibranchs of the Genus Goniobranchus and Evaluation of Their Anatomical Distribution" Marine Drugs 19, no. 12: 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120680

APA Style

Forster, L. C., Clegg, J. K., Cheney, K. L., & Garson, M. J. (2021). Expanding the Repertoire of Spongian-16-One Derivatives in Australian Nudibranchs of the Genus Goniobranchus and Evaluation of Their Anatomical Distribution. Marine Drugs, 19(12), 680. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop