1. Introduction
As, a marine sponge extract and anhydrophytosphingosine, jaspine B, inhibits sphingosine kinases and their proliferative activities [
1]. Since its isolation, several biochemical studies have demonstrated its ability to inhibit microtubule formation, cell growth, and cell death program stimulation [
2]. Human Sk-Mel28 melanoma cell lines and Murine B16 proliferation, for example, are inhibited by jaspine B in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Exposing these cells to jaspine B triggers cell death by typical apoptosis, as indicated by phosphatidylserine externalization, the release of cytochrome c, and caspase processing [
2]. Although biological studies of jaspine B and its congeners have exhibited cytotoxic properties in several cancer cell lines [
3,
4,
5], no commercial jaspine B natural products are available for therapeutic use.
Sphingomyelin, a cell membrane sphingolipid, plays a vital role in cell growth and mitosis and is upregulated in osteosarcoma and synovial sarcoma (SS). The metabolic intermediate of the sphingolipid pathway, ceramide, is critical in cellular signal transduction and apoptotic pathways. Jaspine B inhibits sphingomyelin synthase [
2] (
Figure 1) and induces apoptosis in HeLa cells, which are associated with disrupting sphingolipid homeostasis, resulting in increased ceramide levels [
3]. In gastric epithelial cells, jaspine B targets the autophagy pathways and demonstrates anticancer effects [
4]. The bioavailability and accumulation of jaspine B in the cells during the steady state is a significant factor that correlates with its cytotoxic efficacy [
6]. However, low bioavailability due to limited intestinal absorption and extensive oral clearance impedes its application as a promising anticancer agent. Coadministration with bile salts increases oral bioavailability and may enhance its pharmacological effects [
7].
This study developed a liposomal delivery system to improve jaspine B’s pharmacokinetics. We also tested its ability to inhibit cell proliferation in the sarcoma cell line and SS tumor growth in the animal model. Liposomes, a type of vesicle used for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications, are biocompatible delivery systems that enhance a drug’s oral bioavailability [
8]. Liposomes improve hydrophobic compound solubility and prevent chemical or enzymatic degradation in the gut. The lipid bilayer structure provides other advantages, such as cell membrane adherence, enhanced permeability, and lymphatic uptake. Liposomes consist of a phospholipid bilayer enclosing a small volume of aqueous buffer. Their size may vary from tens of nanometers to hundreds of micrometers, based on the protocol utilized for their preparation and use. Liposomes have successfully improved the oral bioavailability of various compounds, including peptides, proteins, and hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs [
9]. Liposomes are formulated using several methods. A new microfluidic fabrication uses streams of an ethanolic solution and an aqueous buffer and lipids forced through the central channel of a microfluidic mixer cartridge. (
Figure 2). The two liquid phases pass through a thin sheet with rectangular cross sections to form vesicular liposomes. Vesicle size is controlled by adjusting the total flow rate (TFR) and flow rate ratio (FRR) between the lipid and aqueous phases [
10].
We developed a novel jaspine B liposomal delivery system of jaspine B that enhance both in vitro and in vivo efficacy. We characterized the liposomal formulation using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and LC-MS/MS methods and tested the in vitro and in vivo efficacy in an SS cell line and an animal model.
3. Discussion
Yamato- SS cell line study results indicate that jaspine B formulation in a liposome significantly increased in vitro anticancer potency, with a lower IC
50 than jaspine B (
Figure 6 and
Table 2). Jaspine B’s efficacy against tumors originating from various tissues has been reported, where its effectiveness was dependent upon steady-state cellular accumulation [
12]. Our observation may also be attributed to improved jaspine B stability and liposomal lipid bilayer impact on enhanced cell permeation and accumulation.
Systemic administration of jaspine B significantly reduced lung metastatic melanoma cell growth [
13]. However, extensive systemic clearance or low bioavailability after oral administration, due to poor solubility and extensive first-pass effect, hampered its efficacy and reduced suitability for cancer treatment. Choi et al. used a bile salts coadministration approach. They improved jaspine B bioavailability by several folds, attributed to jaspine B’s permeation through the lipophilic cell membrane and tight junction [
7]. These results suggest that developing oral jaspine B formulations with bile acids and phospholipids could increase the compound’s bioavailability and tissue permeability [
14]; however, the observed pharmacokinetic improvement was not evaluated for pharmacodynamic effect. In other studies, the administration of several anticancer drugs, such as doxorubicin [
15] and paclitaxel [
16], in phospholipid mixture formulations also resulted in a higher cellular concentration and reduced systemic toxicity compared to the plain drug.
Similarly, we observed a pronounced pharmacodynamic effect on tumor growth suppression in a SS animal model after 4-week oral liposomal delivery of jaspine B, which outperformed plain jaspine B (
Figure 7 and
Figure 8). A significant level of deference was not attained due to the small number of animals enrolled in the study of jaspine B (
n = 4) and its liposomal formulation (
n = 3); however, we assume the observed in vivo efficacy improvement is rooted in jaspine B’s enriched oral bioavailability, parallel to the Choi et al. study. We are currently conducting a pharmacokinetic study in healthy animals to confirm the observed data and further elaborate on the mechanisms responsible for the observed effects.
The lipid compositions, their ratios, and jaspine B concentrations were determined from pilot study results, jaspine B physicochemical characteristics, the manufacturer’s protocol, initial suggestions from Precision NanoSystems scientists, and previous lipophilic molecule studies [
17,
18,
19]. The lipid concentration was kept constant at 5 mg/mL because higher concentrations clogged the cartridge and did not yield any liposomes. The formulation and characterization data of jaspine B (
Figure 5 and
Table 1) indicate that an optimal liposome size with narrower size distribution and highest EE% was achieved using a lipid mixture of 2:4:4
w/
w (cholesterol, DSPC, and DSPE-PEG), jaspine B concentration of 2 mg/mL, FFR of 2:1 and TFR of 8 mL/min. Although using a lower concentration of jaspine B at both values of FRR produced smaller liposomes, the size distribution was much broader, and EE% was much lower. Similar results were observed when a higher concentration of jaspine B with an FRR of 3:1 was used. The morphologic TEM image of liposomes clearly shows a lipidic bilayer structure surrounding an aqueous phase at the center. Jaspine B’s amphiphilic chemical structure (
Figure 9) enabled its incorporation into the liposome’s lipidic bilayer shell, which enhanced vesicle formation, increased membrane permeability, and improved in vitro and in vivo efficacy.
The short-period stability study of the liposomes showed an optimal shelf-life for this nanocarrier delivery system. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the possibility of preparation and storage by other means (e.g., lyophilized powder), which could further extend its shelf-life and ease its administration and usage. Considering jaspine B’s remarkable anti-tumor effect, the proposed liposomal drug delivery system offers a potentially effective treatment for SS and other cancers.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Materials
Cholesterol, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), and DSPE-PEG2000 Carboxylic Acid were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). All other reagents used were analytical grade and purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
4.2. Stereoselective Scale-Up Synthesis of Amphiphilic Jaspine B towards Liposome Formation
Jaspine B was synthesized and scaled up based on our published method [
11]. Briefly, stereoselective synthesis of jaspine B was performed using a chiral pool strategy starting with L-Serine (
Figure 9). The second-generation chiral aminobutenolide is synthesized in gram quantities starting from L-Serine (
Figure 9a). Chiral aminobutenolide (
Figure 9b) has inherent chirality with unsaturated lactone (Michael acceptor) and protected nucleophiles (OH, NH
2). Acetonide deprotection of aminobutenolide followed by Michael addition affords thermodynamically favorable enantiopure bicyclic furafuranone (
Figure 9c) as the only product. The all-syn tri-substitution is achieved in this transformation. Functional group transformation of the lactone in bicyclic furafuranone (
Figure 9c) provides an
N, O-protected jaspine B precursor (
Figure 9d). Global deprotection of jaspine B precursor under acidic conditions results in enantiopure jaspine B as HCl salt (
Figure 9e).
Jaspine B’s structural core has an all-syn trisubstituted tetrahydrofuran core, which constitutes the C-2 lipophilic tetradecyl alkyl chain and C-3 hydroxy, C-4 amino polar functionalities. This substitution pattern differentiates jaspine B with a hydrophilic head group and a lipophilic tail, mimicking the sphingolipid-type scaffold. This characteristic differentiation makes jaspine B amphiphilic. It is noteworthy that the final step of the jaspine B synthesis involves global deprotection of N-Cbz, N and O pentanonide in an aqueous HCl under vigorous stirring and reflux conditions. Jaspine B’s amphiphilic nature appears as an oil droplet immiscible in an aqueous environment supporting the structural features of liposomal formation. Upon cooling, it solidifies as white solid immiscible HCl salt.
For structural characterization, using the Bruker DRX 400 Mhz spectrometer, NMR spectra were recorded with the chemical shifts (δ) reported in ppm relative to CD3OD (for 1H) as the internal standard. The AB Sciex (Foster City, CA, USA) QTRAP 5500 quadrupole mass spectrometer in positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI) was used for molecular ion and purity confirmation.
The chemical composition of this liposome involves Cholesterol, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), and DSPE-PEG2000 Carboxylic Acid. The amphiphilic jaspine B matches the other constituents of liposome and efficiently enhances the vesicle formation (
Figure 10).
4.3. Preparation and Characterization of Liposomal Vesicles Using Microfluidics
Liposomes were prepared using a microfluidic mixing method using the NanoAssemblr™ Platform (Precision Nanosystems, Vancouver, BC, Canada). The mixer contains channels for organic and aqueous phases. Disposable syringes of 1 mL were used for inlet streams. Controlled TFR (8 mL/min) and aqueous to organic phase FRR (3:1 and 2:1) and two concentrations of 1 and 2 mg/mL jaspine B were used to achieve the optimum liposome size, encapsulation efficiency, and loading capacity. The temperature was controlled by a heating block unit and maintained at 60 °C.
To formulate the liposomes, 10 mg of lipid mixture (2:4:4
w/
w of cholesterol, DSPC, and DSPE-PEG) was dissolved in 2 mL ethanol to achieve a 5 mg/mL lipid solution. Such lipid composition, ratio, and concentration have been successfully used in studies for liposomal encapsulation of lipophilic and hydrophilic molecules [
17,
18,
19]. The lipid concentration was kept constant at 5 mg/mL to avoid cartridge clogging at higher concentrations.
Empty vesicles were manufactured by injecting lipids and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS 10 mM, pH 7.4) into the instrument’s separate chamber arms. The final liposomal formulation was collected from the chamber outlet and dialyzed at room temperature using PBS 10 mM. Then, liposome solutions were centrifuged in 10 kDa molecular weight cut-off falcon tubes for one hour at 4 °C to remove the remaining solvent. Jaspine B liposome formulation procedure was similar and used the same TFR and FRR input conditions, while jaspine B was dissolved in ethanol along with lipids due to its lipophilicity.
Size measurements and recording of the morphology of liposomes were performed using a TEM instrument according to a method described previously [
20]. A total of 20 µL of the sample was deposited onto mesh carbon-coated copper grids to obtain a thin film. The excess solvent was drained gently by blotting filter paper during the verification process. Then, the grids were air-dried at room temperature. The prepared grids were transferred to a grid holder and examined by a TEM instrument (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.
4.4. Jaspine B Analysis Using Liquid-Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
The level of jaspine B was measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method [
7] in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The system was composed of liquid chromatography in tandem with mass spectrometry (Shimadzu, Columbia, MD, USA) with a controller (CBM-20A), two binary pumps (LC-30AD), an autosampler (SIL-30AC), and an AB Sciex (Foster City, CA, USA) QTRAP 5500 quadrupole mass spectrometer in positive electrospray ionization mode (ESI). The chromatograms were monitored and integrated by the Analyst 1.7.2 software (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA).
LC separation was performed on an analytical reversed-phase column Kinetex®C18 100 × 2.1 mm (1.7 μm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) by a combination of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile and water (85:15, v/v) in isocratic mode at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min.
The positive ion ESI mass spectrometric parameters were as follows: capillary voltage; 5.5 kV, temperature; 250 °C, declustering potential (DP); 50 V, and collision cell exit potential (CXP); 15 V quantification was performed using MRM at m/z 299.8→270.1 (jaspine B), and m/z 336.1→320.0 (IS). Nitrogen was used as collision gas, and the collision energies were set at 30–40 eV. Calibration curves using peak height ratio (analyte over IS) were constructed over the range of 0.5 to 16 ng/mL in liposomes to measure jaspine B concentrations in liposomes.
4.5. Encapsulation Efficiency of Jaspine B Liposomes
The EE% of jaspine B in the liposomes was determined using a previously described method with minor modification [
21]. The liposome samples were centrifuged at 8000×
g for 10 min to remove unencapsulated jaspine B; supernatants were treated with an equal volume of triton-X100 (Ameresco. Solon, OH, USA), followed by centrifugation at 20,000×
g for 30 min. Twenty µL of 200 ng/mL IS was added to each sample, and the peak intensity was measured using an LC-MS/MS method. The content of jaspine B loaded in the liposomes was then calculated by a calibration curve. The EE was calculated using the following equation:
where MJL is the mass of jaspine B loaded into the liposomes, and MJI is the initial mass of the jaspine B in the system.
The stability of jaspine B liposome solution in PBS pH 7.4 was tested for size and EE% after storage at 4 °C for two months.
4.6. In Vitro Cell Viability Assay
A cell viability assay was performed using a previously published method [
22]. Dr. Torsten Nielson, University of British Columbia, provided the human Yamato-SS cell line (CVCL_6C44)which was maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO
2. The in vitro cell viability assay was performed using MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethyl thiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) reagent to compare the viability and anti-proliferation effects of jaspine B with jaspine B liposome in different concentrations. Cell viability was normalized using a drug-free medium or empty liposome as a control treatment. Cells were seeded in a 96-well tissue culture dish at 10,000 cells/well and incubated for twenty-four hours. Serial dilutions of jaspine B and jaspine B liposomes were prepared so that the final concentration ranged from 0.01 to 100 µM. After 72 h of treatment, 5 mg/mL MTT was added to each well, resulting in a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL MTT; cells were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO
2 for 2.5 h. Formazan crystals were resolubilized in 10% SDS and 0.01 M HCl, and the absorbance of the samples was measured at 570 nm and normalized to 650 nm using a microplate reading spectrophotometer, VarioscanLux (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
4.7. SS Induction, Dosage Regimens, and In Vivo Study in Mice
An animal model of SS was used to further investigate and compare the efficacy of jaspine B liposomes with plain jaspine B. Mouse experiments were conducted with the approval of the Idaho State University’s Institutional Animal Care Committee under legal and ethical standards established by the National Research Council and published in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (protocol #757, approved 5 July 2019). The previously described Rosa26-LSL-SS18-SSX1; Ptenfl/fl and Rosa26-LSL-SS18-SSX2; Ptenfl/fl mice [
23] were maintained on a mixed strain background, C57BL/6 and SvJ. Mice were genotyped with the following primers: Rosa26-LSL-SS18-SSX (F flox—AAACCGCGAAGAGTTTGTCCTC, F wt—GTTATCAGTAAGGGAGCTGCAGTGG, R—GGCGGATCACAAGCAATAATAACC) Pten (F flox—CAAGCACTCTGCGAACTGAG, R—AAGTTTTTGAAGGCAAGATGC). TATCre was dosed with 10 μL intramuscular injections at 50 μM at 1 month of age. Then, animals were randomly divided into four groups; the control group receiving vehicle (PBS) (
n = 7), jaspine B group receiving 5 mg/kg jaspine B (
n = 4), empty liposome group receiving empty liposome without jaspine B (
n = 3), and jaspine B liposome group receiving 5 mg/kg encapsulated jaspine B (
n = 3) [
23]. The tumor measurements were performed by an experienced person (blinded to the animal treatment group) using a digital caliper. Length, width, and height of the tumors were measured, and tumor sizes were calculated using a standard equation of W × D × L/2 and reported as mm
3.
4.8. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 statistical software (San Diego, CA, USA), and results were expressed as the mean ± SD. One-way analysis of the variances (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the differences between groups, followed by Tukey’s post hoc analysis. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.