Next Article in Journal
Spatial Distribution and Biochemical Characterization of Serine Peptidase Inhibitors in the Venom of the Brazilian Sea Anemone Anthopleura cascaia Using Mass Spectrometry Imaging
Previous Article in Journal
Krill Oil’s Protective Benefits against Ultraviolet B-Induced Skin Photoaging in Hairless Mice and In Vitro Experiments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantification of a Sulfated Marine-Inspired Antifouling Compound in Several Aqueous Matrices: Biodegradation Studies and Leaching Assays from Polydimethylsiloxane Coatings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bioactive Peptides from Barnacles and Their Potential for Antifouling Development

1
Center for Evolution and Conservation Biology, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
2
Key Laboratory of Bioactive Peptides of Yunnan Province, KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, National Resource Center for Non-Human Primates, Kunming Primate Research Center, National Research Facility for Phenotypic & Genetic Analysis of Model Animals (Primate Facility), Sino-African Joint Research Center and Engineering Laboratory of Peptides, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Kunming 650107, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(9), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090480
Submission received: 26 July 2023 / Revised: 26 August 2023 / Accepted: 29 August 2023 / Published: 30 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Natural Products with Antifouling Activity, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

:
Barnacles, a prevalent fouler organism in intertidal zones, has long been a source of annoyance due to significant economic losses and ecological impacts. Numerous antifouling approaches have been explored, including extensive research on antifouling chemicals. However, the excessive utilization of small-molecule chemicals appears to give rise to novel environmental concerns. Therefore, it is imperative to develop new strategies. Barnacles exhibit appropriate responses to environmental challenges with complex physiological processes and unique sensory systems. Given the assumed crucial role of bioactive peptides, an increasing number of peptides with diverse activities are being discovered in barnacles. Fouling-related processes have been identified as potential targets for antifouling strategies. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of peptides derived from barnacles, aiming to underscore their significant potential in the quest for innovative solutions in biofouling prevention and drug discovery.

1. Introduction

The phenomenon of biofouling, which refers to the adhesion of undesired organisms onto solid surfaces, poses a global challenge, entailing significant economic and environmental consequences. As recorded, the financial costs associated with biofouling control have ranged from USD 1.5 to 3 billion per year [1,2]. The scientific community has dedicated significant efforts to exploring suitable strategies for inhibiting the fouling process, with a particular focus on barnacles [3]. As one of the largest macrofouling organisms globally, barnacles have limited natural predators and are frequently employed as target model species in antifouling research. Around 400 natural products derived from marine microorganisms, algae, and marine invertebrates have been documented for their antifouling activity. However, the majority of antifouling agents targeting macrofouling were predominantly composed of small-molecule chemicals and exhibited hazardous properties [4,5,6]. Although certain small-molecule chemicals, such as now-prohibited tributyltin, exhibit favorable performance characteristics, only a limited number have been successfully commercialized and deployed in marine environments. There is a great need to explore more effective, environmentally friendly antifouling agents, particularly those targeting barnacles. Peptides, which play a crucial role in the physiological processes of barnacles [7], could be key targets and promising candidates for screening antifouling agents.
Peptides, consisting of amino acids connected by peptide bonds, have been reported to play a crucial role in the physiological process of barnacles, particularly in relation to their neurosystem and settlement mechanisms [8]. Moreover, peptides serve as excellent signals in marine ecosystems and offer numerous advantages over smaller information molecules like amino acids. This provides an opportunity for the screening of antifouling agents when targeting internal functional peptides in relation to their production processes. Numerous bioactive peptides, which play an essential role in the neurosystem, hormone regulation, cell growth, and reproduction, have been explored [9,10] for drugs and industries with great advantages, including high efficiency, safety, and higher selectivity [11,12]. These characteristics also render peptides promising candidates for antifouling applications. Moreover, barnacles can serve as a rich source of peptides, which are commonly present as bioactive compounds within their structures. Bioinformatic analysis revealed the presence of additional unexplored peptide sequences. Dominguez-Perez’s team found over 11,755 peptide sequences from Pollicipes pollicipes, although their separate identification was not conducted [13]. Currently, the majority of barnacle-derived peptides are neuropeptides, as barnacles have demonstrated unique mechanisms for determining their exploratory stage and settlement status, primarily relying on sensory mechanoreceptive and chemoreceptive signals [14]. The physiological function of peptides and in vivo chemical reactions in barnacles, such as larvae development, settlement, intercommunication, and intracommunication, remain enigmatic. There are numerous unexplored barnacle-derived peptides.
Barnacle-derived peptides are a promising yet overlooked source for screening antifouling agents. Approximately 71% of the Earth’s surface is encompassed by oceans, harboring a plethora of bioactive substances with rare and distinctive chemical characteristics derived from their intricate ecological milieu. For instance, sponges possess the capability to synthesize diverse secondary metabolites as a defense mechanism [15]. It has been reported that sponge Geodia barretti could produce antifouling cyclopeptide with an EC50 value of 15 nM [16,17]. With their gregarious nature, barnacles exhibit a preference for aged fouling sites and are believed to inhibit the growth of other fouling species. These chemical defenses not only manifest at the macroscopic level but also operate within the internal environment of barnacles. The production of prostaglandins could be influenced by feeding and environmental factors, subsequently impacting the reproductive processes of barnacles [18]. Regulating the production and efficacy of keystone peptides could potentially constitute a groundbreaking advancement in biofouling prevention, with numerous antibiofilm peptides having been extensively investigated and recognized as environmentally benign antifouling agents. Post-settlement A. amphitrite effectively eradicated the bacterial biofilm using a fluid containing reactive oxygen species (ROS) [8]. Barnacles, commonly employed as a modal organism for screening antifouling compounds, hold potential as a gateway for the targeted validation and screening of antifouling agents.
There is a growing recognition among researchers that barnacle-derived peptides hold significant potential as a promising target and source of bioinformatically based antifouling compounds. Barnacles not only act as fouling organisms but also serve as environmental stressors. The physiological and behavioral adaptability of barnacles enables their utilization as model organisms in various environmental research, including studies on climate change and mental monitoring [19]. These examples demonstrate the significant potential of exploring new functional peptides. Unlike conventional extraction methods, the contemporary approach for investigating natural products involves genome mining based on machine learning, which integrates homology searching, active peptide characterization, and enzymatic hydrolysis strategies [20,21,22]. Barnacle proteomics analysis has revealed the presence of numerous functional proteins [19]. Interestingly, bioinformatic analysis revealed that the metabolite and pathways of barnacles, particularly during the sensing, reproduction, and settlement stages, have a striking similarity with insects undergoing molting processes [23]. This discovery provides a novel avenue for barnacle research, highlighting the intricate nature of peptide-mediated processes and emphasizing the potential insights that could be gained from exploring insect-derived peptides. Although numerous peptides have been investigated using bioinformatic approaches, the majority of them lack comprehensive validation. A comprehensive understanding of the intricate functionalities of peptides is of the utmost importance. A more profound elucidation of the mechanism in barnacles could facilitate the development of novel antifouling strategies.
Given the alarming state of biofouling, it is imperative and opportune to explore novel potential antifouling strategies with reduced toxicity. This review provides a comprehensive summary of barnacle-related peptides categorized according to different physiological processes, offering valuable insights for future investigations into antifouling approaches. Specifically, this review highlights: (i) an overview of various types of barnacle-derived peptides based on physiological roles; (ii) the involvement of peptides in the biofouling process and their functions; and (iii) the potential utility and prospects for further research development in utilizing barnacle-derived peptides. While acknowledging that this review might not be exhaustive, it presents compelling evidence supporting the significance of barnacle-derived peptides in barnacles’ physiological function and their promising applications.

2. Barnacles–Smart Macrofouler

2.1. The Structure of Barnacles

Barnacles exhibit a complex life cycle consisting of six stages in the planktonic and the sessile phases. The shifting of these stages is highly sensitive to environmental factors, making them potential targets for antifouling agents that can inhibit dynamic variation. The structure of barnacles, particularly the sensory organs, has aroused considerable interest among researchers and scholars. The sensing process of cyprids has been found to be associated with their attachment organs, namely the two attachment discs on the antennules (see Liang et al., 2019 for review) [8]. However, a more detailed dissection is required due to the division of labor and cooperation among organs in many functional physiological processes. Nevertheless, in ripened individuals, some adhesive-secreting cells adhere to the ovary, making it difficult to separate them [13]. Additionally, certain glands, such as cement glands, have been reported to degenerate during molting, further complicating the dissection process. Previous studies by Gallus involved studying the entire soft tissue immediately after its removal from the shell for subsequent bioinformatic research [24] but yielded ambiguous results. Moreover, contamination from bacteria poses challenges in achieving accurate separation and drawing the correct conclusions. For instance, it has been suggested that bacterial activity could contribute to barnacle settlement pheromone’s native serine protease activity [25]. Given that single-cell sequencing is widely employed nowadays, obtaining high-quality clean samples from barnacles becomes crucial [26]. To accomplish this goal effectively, compiling and referencing additional studies is beneficial.

2.2. The Role of Barnacle in Biofouling

Barnacles are a globally renowned macrofouler and are recognized as common vector species [27]. They exhibit a ubiquitous distribution within the intertidal zone. Biofouling is a dynamic and intricate process that can be categorized into two components, namely microfouling and macrofouling. In greater detail, biofouling undergoes four stages: (1) the adsorption of organic particles, (2) colonization by primary organisms, (3) the settlement of invertebrates, and (4) the establishment of a complex macroscopic fouling community [28]. Within aquatic environments, microorganisms such as bacteria and algae rapidly attach to surfaces within minutes, leading to biofilm formation until the larvae explore the surface. Ultimately, a diverse macroscopic fouling community is established following the settlement of macroalgal zoospores and invertebrate larvae [28]. In this process, barnacles function as integral components of the macroorganism and establish connections with other fouling organisms. The chemical defenses between these organisms represent a valuable source of antifouling agents, inspiring the further development of antifouling strategies. For instance, certain bacterial species that are capable of forming biofilms have been demonstrated to inhibit the settlement of barnacle larvae [29], and this inhibitory effect has been reciprocated [30]. Given that barnacles possess the ability to cleanse biofilms and engage in communication [8], they serve as a reservoir for anti-microfouling compounds. Y-organs, which are molting glands found in decapod crustaceans, provide animals with flexibility when controlling their molting time. While previous studies have shed light on the functionality of Y-organs in crustaceans [31], there is limited documentation regarding barnacle molting glands specifically associated with the molting process [32]. Understanding the settlement mechanisms of barnacles is closely intertwined with comprehending the biofouling process; thus, investigating the mechanism of this settlement could aid in identifying potential targets for antifouling interventions.

2.3. The Settlement and the Molting Processes of Barnacles

A deeper understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying molting and settlement is crucial for identifying novel antifouling targets in barnacles. The settlement process is intricately linked to the fouling substrate, such as the biofilm, with its composition potentially exerting positive or negative effects on the settlement. Additionally, certain barnacle organisms exhibit a preference for pristine surfaces [33,34,35]. It has been postulated that the nervous system plays a pivotal role in controlling the settlement process, whereby larvae are primed for settling once their nervous system reaches full development. Choosing an inappropriate substrate may also result in larval mortality. Perceived cues are believed to be mediated through specific receptors located on a larval sensory organ, with signals transmitted via both nervous and cellular signal transduction systems. Notably, arthropodin, an inducer found in the adult shell of Balanus balanoides, has been proposed to participate in the gregarious settlement and represents the first peptide-like signaling molecule discovered [25]. In subsequent investigations, it was found that the larvae exhibited a discernment between conspecific SIPC and those belonging to different species. Based on transcriptome analysis, the MARK cascade, blood coagulation cascade, and Wnt signaling were identified as pivotal regulators in larval development, especially driving the transition to the settlement stage [36]. From a bioactive compound perspective, it has been well-documented that barnacle metamorphosis is regulated via hormones such as methyl farnesoate (sesquiterpenoid) and receptors with structurally comparable features to the insect juvenile hormone [23,37], which exhibit analogous structures compared to those found in insects. Despite not being peptides, the control of methyl farnesoate is intricately linked to neuropeptides [38]. This finding offers a novel perspective on the research methodologies concerning barnacles, suggesting that insights into the molting process and insect pathway could enhance our understanding of these organisms. The settlement and molting processes of barnacles were found to be interconnected yet distinct phenomena. For example, protein kinase C, a family of protein kinase enzymes, was reported to be involved in larval metamorphosis rather than the actual settlement process of B. amphitrite [39]. There is compelling evidence to suggest that the process of adhesion occurs in a cyclic, multi-step manner synchronized with the molt cycles [40] and exhibits sensitivity to various environmental conditions and stressors [36,41]. In this study, we discussed these two processes separately, introducing the corresponding peptides in distinct sections.
Feeding is a crucial physiological activity that plays a pivotal role in preventing obesity and metabolic diseases by regulating metabolism. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the cessation of feeding during the cyprid period in barnacles remain unknown [42]. FMRFamid-like peptides have been identified in B. amphitrite and are believed to be essential to digestive processes [43], yet their functional principles have been poorly elucidated. Although several behavioral experiments, including observations of larval swimming behaviors, settlement experiments, and color experiments, have been conducted for validation, there has been limited investigation into appetitive behavior and food consumption—an area extensively studied in fruit fly research but largely unexplored in barnacle research. Since the existence of a non-feeding cyprid stage during the planktonic phase of barnacle life stages has been identified, exploring feeding behavior may offer new insights into inhibiting barnacle settlement. Furthermore, energy levels are closely associated with elevated lipid levels, which could serve as potential indicators for further study and as targets for intervention.
In this section, we aimed to emphasize the significant potential of barnacle-derived peptides due to their close association with the biofouling process. These peptides could serve as promising targets for inhibiting the barnacle settlement or disrupting the fouling process in other organisms via intra- and inter-communication mechanisms. Enhancing our understanding of barnacle-derived peptides and their roles in biofouling could contribute to exploring novel antifouling strategies.

3. The Role of Barnacle-Derived Peptides in Biofouling

3.1. Neuropeptides—The Regulator

Neuropeptides, bioactive peptides present in the nervous system, play a crucial role as major regulators of physiological processes during barnacle development stages, including growth, reproduction, settlement, environment sensing, molting and cuticle hardening [44], feeding behavior, adaptation to external factors (stress regulation [45] and temperature fluctuation [46]), protein degradation and cell–cell interactions [47]. Crustaceans with a relatively simple neurosystem serve as an excellent model for studying these phenomena. However, recent studies have indicated that neuropeptides in barnacles are not solely produced by the brain or central nervous system [48] but are also expressed in non-neuronal tissues like compound eyes [45]. For example, the syn cerebrum of the cypris exhibits a remarkable complexity involving structures such as frontal filaments, nauplius eyes, compound eyes, and antennules [49]. Though the correlations between different neuropeptides were tested widely, their precise cellular signaling mechanisms remained elusive [50]. These findings collectively indicate that the working principle of neuropeptides can be complex even in a simple system.
Biofouling is a dynamic and complex process, and many parts are mainly controlled by neuropeptides, such as biofilm recognition [47], the settlement decision, and the swimming depth [51]. The pigment dispersing hormone (PDH) was initially isolated from the eyestalks of the shrimp Pandalus borealis as a light-adapting hormone and was then also discovered in the barnacle [52]. PDH signaling likely involves adenylate cyclase, cAMP, and protein kinase A, while its localization has been observed in the protocerebrum with a highly intricate internal organization of neuropil regions and tracts consisting of the optic ganglia [53].
The settlement of barnacles was assumed to be regulated by a specialized sensory-neurosecretory system [54], which facilitated decision-making processes. The selection of a suitable substratum for the permanent attachment of competent cyprid relies on their sensitive responses to both the physical and chemical characteristics of the environment, as well as conspecific biogenic cues [55]. However, the underlying mechanisms of this system remain unknown. Compared to the adults, the nerve development in barnacle larvae appears more intriguing and diverse. Previous studies have demonstrated the regulation of PDH, SIFamide, calcitonin, and B-type allatostatin, tachykinin-related peptides in both cyprids and juveniles [7]. FMRFamide (Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-amide, FMRFa), belonging to a family of brain-gut peptides, is widely distributed in the nervous system of the invertebrate [56], and almost 50 FMRFamide IR neurons were identified in B. amphitrite [24]. The function of FMRFamide-like peptide IR neurons in the cyprid stage differed from that observed in adult barnacles. In adults, over 50 FMRFamid-like peptides IR were found within the ventral ganglion, while only two of them were involved in rhythmic muscular contractions of the limbs [57]. It is common for peptides to be discovered in barnacles while their exact functions remain unknown, such as the prothoracicotropic hormone [23]. The identification and characterization of the inhibitors and excitants for these functional peptides could provide novel antifouling strategies.
Barnacles, classified as arthropods, are closely related to other crustaceans. However, certain proteins and peptides found in barnacles have been observed to play similar roles in insects [58]. Bioinformatics data further support this interesting relationship; Yan’s work has revealed that some neuropeptides of B. amphitrite exhibit a closer affinity with insects than decapods [7]. The FGLamide allatostatin family is widely distributed among insects and crustaceans and has been identified as an inhibitor of juvenile hormone biosynthesis [3,59]. Allatostatins are pleiotropic neuropeptides that have also been widely discovered in insects and crustaceans. They primarily serve two functions: inhibiting juvenile hormone synthesis and reducing food intake. Three types of allatostatins were found in barnacles using meta-transcriptomics and were further verified with a qPCR. A-type allatostatin, regarded as an emerging hormone related to the nutrient state, could accelerate the use of lipids, regulate metabolism and feed decisions, and play an important role in cyprid: the non-feeding stage [60]. B-type allatostatin, also known as a myo-inhibiting peptide, is implicated in controlling visceral muscle contractions, the regulation of metabolism, feeding, and sleep. There is evidence showing that B-type allatostatin is involved in the immune system [61]. C-type allatostatin, characterized by a conserved unblocked PISCF motif at the C-terminus, is separately regulated by the known C-type allatostatin gene [62]. C-type allatostatin has been demonstrated to modulate the neuromuscular system and has been distributed in the stomatogastric nervous system for crabs [63]. Liu et al. found that C-type allatostatin could inhibit vitellogenin absorption and oocyte growth [62]. However, the exact functions of C-type allatostatins in barnacles remain to be further explored. The red pigment-concentrating hormone (pGlu-Leu-Asn-Phe-Ser-Pro-Gly-Trp -amide, localizationRPCH) is widely found in crustaceans and insects but has little record in the barnacle. The absence of RPCH is surprising, and Webster put forward the hypothesis that PDH-like immunoreactive (PDHLI) neurons could override any pigment-concentrating effect of RPCH [64] without further evidence to support it. The peptides in inserts and crustaceans can only be a reference but not solid evidence for barnacle research.
Currently, bioinformatic methods, including in silico genome and transcriptome mining, are widely employed for the discovery of natural products from barnacles and have proved to be successful and effective [23,47]. The identification of neuropeptides in barnacles primarily relies on transcriptomics data; however, visual studies on neuropeptides can provide more comprehensive insights. Kalke et al. imaged the nervous system of barnacles in different stages by immunolabelling and observed their variation [49]. Integrating imaging techniques with bioinformatic tools could be a promising strategy to elucidate the underlying mechanism and validate the functional process of specific neuropeptides. Furthermore, the identification of unique neuropeptide structures in barnacles, which could potentially modulate their functional efficiency, may provide additional evidence for neuroscientific research.
Integrating the bioinformatic method, imaging method, validation experiment, and extraction method can deepen our understanding of peptides in barnacles and their functions and enable the exploration of more antifouling strategies (Table 1).

3.2. Settlement Peptide—Adsorption Step in Biofouling

Numerous environmental factors, such as color, olfaction, biofilm, planktonic micro-community, and chemicals, are considered significant cues for biofouling settlements. Settlement-inducing protein pheromones and barnacles with water-borne protein complexes [25] were found to play a vital role in the settlement process both separately and jointly, and the composition, especially the ratio, was closely related to the habitat chosen, adult–adult interaction, and varied between different species of barnacles [66]. Individually, settlement-inducing protein pheromones, a contact pheromone, could induce larvae settlements and function as an adhesive [67]. Tegtmeyer used to claim that peptides with a basic carboxy-terminal amino acid and either a neutral or a basic amino-terminal amino acid could enhance their settlement without further proof [68]. There is little to the structure of the barnacle peptide recorded for a structure–activity relationship that the chemical modification puts forward slowly.
Barnacles are sensitive to sound, color, and olfaction during the exploration stage, and the cyprid relies on sensory mechanoreceptive and chemoreceptive signals to decide the fouling status. Sound can be a neglected factor during the settlement, especially at the cyprid, the nauplius VI stage, and late stage (juvenile and adult), working as an important communication method [36]. Five octopamine receptor subtypes were expressed in the cyprids and further related to the settlement process [69]. Barnacles are supposed to release antibacterial peptides to kill bacteria on the surface before their settlement [70]. The interaction between the bacteria and barnacles, especially the community structure of the biofilm, has been proven to affect the settlement choice of barnacles, especially during the period from cypris larvae to sessile juveniles [44]. The expression of arginine kinase, a primary enzyme related to cellular energy metabolism, varies according to environmental conditions, such as oxidation stress hypoxia and energetic stress regulated by the P38 MARK and NO/cGMP pathway [71,72]. Besides the environmental factors, it is believed that there are active interactions of larvae–adult and adult–adult through the chemical signal, and this also works intraspecifically [73]. There were few exact peptides identified in barnacles that self-assembled monolayers were applied to when exploring antifouling peptides. Ederth’s team designed five peptides and tested the self-assembled and antifouling ability of these peptides [74].
Though there are few peptides identified exactly from barnacle cement, the sequence result from tandem mass spectrometry found peptides similar to bovine trypsin and human transglutaminase, such as XIII A1 peptides [75], which showed that there are more remain unexplored. However, this exploring method lacked further validation, and the extraction method limited the identification of exact functional peptides: a general gap for natural product discovery. Though people have found many strains of algae that could inhibit the settlement of barnacles, and some peptides have been proven to work as signal function, no exact peptides have been identified, while many chemicals have been extracted and identified [76].
Nitric oxide is an important signal transduction molecule and has been reported to negatively affect the larval settlement in various fouling organisms, including gastropods, ascidians, sea urchins, annelids, and barnacles [77]. Current studies have found that nitric oxide signaling may control the overall settlement process in barnacles, and its regulation is mainly conducted via guanylyl cyclase and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cyclic GMP, cGMP) [39]. In addition, nutrients have been proven to have a close connection with the settlement of barnacles. For many years, people have found that the natural inhibitor cues released by algae and coral could avoid sessile fouling [78]. Based on this connection, Jasmin designed a field experiment and found that barnacles preferred nutrient-enriched biofilm, which differed from other fouling communities [79]. Researchers have shed light on many different physiological processes. However, the reason for these phenomena on the molecular level remains unknown and worth further exploration.

3.3. Adhesive and Chemosensory Peptides—The Attachment Strategies of Barnacles

Barnacles have developed remarkable attachment strategies to undergo adhesion without any degradation, even decades after death [80]. This characteristic makes barnacles the main biofouling organism in the marine environment [36]. This is a dramatic and complicated process, including the adsorption process, water displacement, adhesion, and cohesion process. Researchers have devoted a lot of effort to these processes of interest [81]. Based on this fantastic characteristic, researchers are interested in exploring the biochemistry process and have applied it in medical use [81]. Barnacle cement is not a uniform structure, and there are two other interfacial types near the bulk cement. 19kDa peptides were discovered to bind to interfacial cement but did not gain much attention because of their insoluble nature [82]. Over 94% composition of barnacle cement is a multi-protein complex, and numerous short barnacle cement-derived peptides are dominant, but their function remains ambiguous [83]. Moreover, the composition of cement can change in accordance with the site and life stages. Dany’s studies have proved this in Policipes pollicipes [31], where the gland has more identified peptide sequences than cement, dominated by the muscle, cytoskeleton, and other uncharacterized peptides. The polymerization mechanism of barnacle cement raised an interest in underwater adhesive studies. Polypeptides, a chain of amino acids bound together via covalent peptide bonds, were commonly found in barnacle cement [84]. Raman’s team studied peptides Bp1(VPPPCD) and Bp2 (KLDLLTDG), which have both hydrophobic and charged groups, and revealed that the physical structure of peptides could affect adhesion strength [85]. The tight attachment of barnacles is the key challenge for antifouling, where weakening the attachment of barnacles could be a new strategy.
Since more methods, such as self-assembled monolayer techniques, have been successfully used to study the molecular interaction mechanisms of barnacle peptides, more cement peptides need to be explored and deeply learned, which could give more inspiration to the application of barnacle cement for medical use or industrial material. So et al. [86] found that the repeated simple domain and charged domain lie on the full-length 19 kDa protein. Based on this discovery, two biomimetic peptides were designed: one with charged domains and low-complexity domains, which could induce self-assembly and self-organization into nanofibrils, while the other type only had the function of self-assembly. The cement protein Balcp19k was found to form entangled nanofibrils and nanorings under acidic and low-ionic-strength conditions [87]. The detailed designed peptides and barnacle-derived peptides are listed in Table 2.
Self-assembling peptides exhibit specific physicochemical and biochemical activities as well as a potential in antifouling. The direct application of the barnacle-derived peptides is challenging due to their low yield, while self-assembling peptides broaden the scope of potential application. These peptides exhibit good effects on microfouling and the settlement process of barnacles. Researchers have attempted to synthesize key recombinant barnacle cement or barnacle-inspired peptides. These findings show the feasibility and great application potential of self-assembling peptides inspired by barnacles in antifouling and other related fields. It is also of great importance to reveal how barnacles achieve strong adhesion via self-assembling, and this is also a good strategy to block the biofouling process by inhibiting the adhesion.

4. Conclusions

Barnacles, globally renowned marine fouling organisms, possess limited natural predators. Researchers have dedicated over a century to studying barnacles, with a specific emphasis on antifouling mechanisms and cement application. However, the physiological activities and in vivo chemical reactions of barnacles remain largely enigmatic. Although only a restricted number of barnacle-derived peptides have been discovered and characterized thus far, they serve as an inspirational foundation for novel antifouling strategies.
The intricate fouling process of barnacles is intricately regulated by neuropeptides, settlement peptides, and chemosensory peptides. The pivotal role of these peptides in the biofouling process renders them promising targets for antifouling interventions. Furthermore, an enhanced comprehension of barnacle attachment mechanisms could facilitate researchers in exploring a wide range of natural products with diverse activities, thereby expanding the potential applications of barnacle-derived peptides. Despite the significant progress that has been made in barnacle research, numerous knowledge gaps still exist that necessitate further investigation to elucidate their precise underlying mechanisms. Most conclusions and discovered peptides in barnacle research are speculative and uncertain. Proteins and peptides in barnacles have been identified using bioinformatic methods; however, their validation was insufficient. Researchers are gradually recognizing the crux of the matter and are striving to enhance these methodologies. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the advancements made in barnacle-derived peptides, demonstrating the untapped potential of peptides in antifouling applications and expects to inspire further innovation in this field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L., G.X., R.L. and A.W.; Data curation, X.L., H.J. and G.X.; Writing—original draft preparation, X.L. and H.J.; Writing—review and editing, X.L., H.J., G.X., R.L. and A.W.; supervision, R.L. and A.W.; Funding acquisition, R.L. and A.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the PI Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (GML2021GD0807), the Foundation for Scientific and Technical Project of Nansha, Guangzhou (2022ZD005), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2105003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2002219), Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-BRP-008-003 and SAJC202103), Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department (202003AD150008 and 202302AA310035), Kunming Science and Technology Bureau (2022SCP007), New Cornerstone Investigator Program from Shenzhen New Cornerstone Science Foundation and Bureau of Industry and Information Technology of Kunming (2120784001315 and 2120784001310).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this review are available in the main text.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Fitridge, I.; Dempster, T.; Guenther, J.; de Nys, R. The impact and control of biofouling in marine aquaculture: A review. Biofouling 2012, 28, 649–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mathew, N.T.; Kronholm, J.; Bertilsson, K.; Despeisse, M.; Johansson, B. Environmental and Economic Impacts of Biofouling on Marine and Coastal Heat Exchangers. In Life Cycle Engineering and Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stay, B.; Tobe, S.S. The role of allatostatins in juvenile hormone synthesis in insects and crustaceans. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 277–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, L.L.; Wu, C.H.; Qian, P.Y. Marine natural products as antifouling molecules—A mini-review (2014–2020). Biofouling 2020, 36, 1210–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qian, P.Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Fusetani, N. Mini-review: Marine natural products and their synthetic analogs as antifouling compounds: 2009–2014. Biofouling 2015, 31, 101–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Qi, S.H.; Ma, X. Antifouling Compounds from Marine Invertebrates. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yan, X.C.; Chen, Z.F.; Sun, J.; Matsumura, K.; Wu, R.S.; Qian, P.Y. Transcriptomic analysis of neuropeptides and peptide hormones in the barnacle Balanus amphitrite: Evidence of roles in larval settlement. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liang, C.; Strickland, J.; Ye, Z.; Wu, W.; Hu, B.; Rittschof, D. Biochemistry of Barnacle Adhesion: An Updated Review. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiang, Z.; Xue, Q.; Gao, P.; Yu, H.; Wu, M.; Zhao, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Dai, L. Antioxidant peptides from edible aquatic animals: Preparation method, mechanism of action, and structure-activity relationships. Food Chem. 2023, 404 Pt B, 134701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahmed, S.; Mirzaei, H.; Aschner, M.; Khan, A.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Khan, H. Marine peptides in breast cancer: Therapeutic and mechanistic understanding. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 142, 112038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dang, T.; Süssmuth, R.D. Bioactive Peptide Natural Products as Lead Structures for Medicinal Use. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 1566–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cui, M.; Ma, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Luo, X. Antifouling sensors based on peptides for biomarker detection. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 127, 115903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Domínguez-Pérez, D.; Almeida, D.; Wissing, J.; Machado, A.M.; Jänsch, L.; Castro, L.F.; Antunes, A.; Vasconcelos, V.; Campos, A.; Cunha, I. The Quantitative Proteome of the Cement and Adhesive Gland of the Pedunculate Barnacle, Pollicipes pollicipes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kotsiri, M.; Protopapa, M.; Roumelioti, G.M.; Economou-Amilli, A.; Efthimiadou, E.K.; Dedos, S.G. Probing the settlement signals of Amphibalanus amphitrite. Biofouling 2018, 34, 492–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Müller, W.E.; Wang, X.; Proksch, P.; Perry, C.C.; Osinga, R.; Gardères, J.; Schröder, H.C. Principles of biofouling protection in marine sponges: A model for the design of novel biomimetic and bio-inspired coatings in the marine environment? Mar. Biotechnol. 2013, 15, 375–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, R.; Zhou, X.; Xu, T.; Yang, X.; Liu, Y. Diketopiperazines from marine organisms. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 2809–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hedner, E.; Sjögren, M.; Hodzic, S.; Andersson, R.; Göransson, U.; Jonsson, P.R.; Bohlin, L. Antifouling activity of a dibrominated cyclopeptide from the marine sponge Geodia barretti. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rowley, A.F.; Vogan, C.L.; Taylor, G.W.; Clare, A.S. Prostaglandins in non-insectan invertebrates: Recent insights and unsolved problems. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208 Pt 1, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chandramouli, K.H.; Qian, P.; Ravasi, T. Proteomics insights: Proteins related to larval attachment and metamorphosis of marine invertebrates. Front. Mar. Sci. 2014, 1, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gómez-Espinoza, O.; Núñez Montero, K.; Barrientos, L. Antimicrobial Activity of Cyanobacteria-Derived Compounds; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 145–172. ISBN 9780128214916. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bin, Y.; Zhang, W.; Tang, W.; Dai, R.; Li, M.; Zhu, Q.; Xia, J. Prediction of Neuropeptides from Sequence Information Using Ensemble Classifier and Hybrid Features. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 3732–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Olsen, S.M.; Pedersen, L.T.; Laursen, M.H.; Kiil, S.; Dam-Johansen, K. Enzyme-based antifouling coatings: A review. Biofouling 2007, 23, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Z.F.; Matsumura, K.; Wang, H.; Arellano, S.M.; Yan, X.; Alam, I.; Archer, J.A.; Bajic, V.B.; Qian, P.Y. Toward an understanding of the molecular mechanisms of barnacle larval settlement: A comparative transcriptomic approach. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 22913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gallus, L.; Diaspro, A.; Beltrame, F.; Fato, M.; Tagliafierro, G. Three-dimensional computer-aided reconstruction of FMRFamide immunopositive neuron distribution in the ventral ganglion of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite (Cirripedia, Crustacea). Eur. J. Histochem. EJH 2001, 45, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rittschof, D.; Cohen, J.H. Crustacean peptide and peptide-like pheromones and kairomones. Peptides 2004, 25, 1503–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Christie, A.E.; Stemmler, E.A.; Dickinson, P.S. Crustacean neuropeptides. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 4135–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wassick, A.; Hunsucker, K.; Swain, G. A baseline survey to document the distribution and abundance of native and non-native barnacle species in Port Canaveral, Florida. BioInvasions Rec. 2020, 11, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martín-Rodríguez, A.J.; Babarro, J.M.; Lahoz, F.; Sansón, M.; Martín, V.S.; Norte, M.; Fernández, J.J. From broad-spectrum biocides to quorum sensing disruptors and mussel repellents: Antifouling profile of alkyl triphenylphosphonium salts. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rajitha, K.; Nancharaiah, Y.V.; Venugopalan, V.P. Role of bacterial biofilms and their EPS on settlement of barnacle (Amphibalanus reticulatus) larvae. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 150, 104958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rajitha, K.; Nancharaiah, Y.V.; Venugopalan, V.P. Insight into bacterial biofilm-barnacle larvae interactions for environmentally benign antifouling strategies. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020, 149, 104937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shyamal, S.; Das, S.; Guruacharya, A.; Mykles, D.L.; Durica, D.S. Transcriptomic analysis of crustacean molting gland (Y-organ) regulation via the mTOR signaling pathway. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mykles, D.L. Signaling Pathways That Regulate the Crustacean Molting Gland. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 674711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aldred, N.; Clare, A.S. The adhesive strategies of cyprids and development of barnacle-resistant marine coatings. Biofouling 2008, 24, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peng, L.H.; Liang, X.; Xu, J.K.; Dobretsov, S.; Yang, J.L. Monospecific Biofilms of Pseudoalteromonas Promote Larval Settlement and Metamorphosis of Mytilus coruscus. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Olivier, F.; Tremblay, R.; Bourget, E.; Rittschof, D. Barnacle settlement:field experiments on the influence of larval supply, tidal level, biofilm quality and age on Balanus amphitrite cyprids. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 199, 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Al-Aqeel, S.; Ryu, T.; Zhang, H.; Chandramouli, K.H.; Ravasi, T. Transcriptome and Proteome Studies Reveal Candidate Attachment Genes during the Development of the Barnacle Amphibalanus Amphitrite. Front. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kelly, M.; Sanford, E. The evolution of mating systems in barnacles. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010, 392, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nagaraju, G.P.C. Is methyl farnesoate a crustacean hormone. Aquaculture 2007, 272, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Y.; He, L.S.; Zhang, G.; Xu, Y.; Lee, O.O.; Matsumura, K.; Qian, P.Y. The regulatory role of the NO/cGMP signal transduction cascade during larval attachment and metamorphosis of the barnacle Balanus (=Amphibalanus) amphitrite. J. Exp. Biol. 2012, 215 Pt 21, 3813–3822. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, Z.; Leary, D.H.; Liu, J.; Settlage, R.E.; Fears, K.P.; North, S.H.; Mostaghim, A.; Essock-Burns, T.; Haynes, S.E.; Wahl, K.J.; et al. Molt-dependent transcriptomic analysis of cement proteins in the barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. González-Ortegón, E.; Giménez, L.; Blasco, J.; Le Vay, L. Effects of food limitation and pharmaceutical compounds on the larval development and morphology of Palaemon serratus. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 503–504, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hentze, J.L.; Carlsson, M.A.; Kondo, S.; Nässel, D.R.; Rewitz, K.F. The Neuropeptide Allatostatin A Regulates Metabolism and Feeding Decisions in Drosophila. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gallus, L.; Bottaro, M.; Ferrando, S.; Girosi, L.; Ramoino, P.; Tagliafierro, G. Distribution of FMRFamide-like immunoreactivity in the alimentary tract and hindgut ganglia of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite (Cirripedia, Crustacea). Microsc. Res. Tech. 2006, 69, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Essock-Burns, T.; Gohad, N.V.; Orihuela, B.; Mount, A.S.; Spillmann, C.M.; Wahl, K.J.; Rittschof, D. Barnacle biology before, during and after settlement and metamorphosis: A study of the interface. J. Exp. Biol. 2017, 220 Pt 2, 194–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Buchberger, A.; Muthuvel, G.; Li, L. Expression and distribution of neuropeptides in the nervous system of the crab Carcinus maenas and their roles in environmental stress. Proteomics 2015, 15, 3969–3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nishizaki, M.T.; Carrington, E. The effect of water temperature and velocity on barnacle growth: Quantifying the impact of multiple environmental stressors. J. Therm. Biol. 2015, 54, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wong, Y.H.; Yu, L.; Zhang, G.; He, L.S.; Qian, P.Y. In Silico Prediction of Neuropeptides/Peptide Hormone Transcripts in the Cheilostome Bryozoan Bugula neritina. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Van den Pol, A.N. Neuropeptide transmission in brain circuits. Neuron 2012, 76, 98–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kalke, P.; Frase, T.; Richter, S. From swimming towards sessility in two metamorphoses—The drastic changes in structure and function of the nervous system of the bay barnacle Amphibalanus improvisus (Crustacea, Thecostraca, Cirripedia) during development. Contrib. Zool. 2020, 89, 324–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marco, H.G.; Verlinden, H.; Vanden Broeck, J.; Gäde, G. Characterisation and pharmacological analysis of a crustacean G protein-coupled receptor: The red pigment-concentrating hormone receptor of Daphnia pulex. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Conzelmann, M.; Offenburger, S.L.; Asadulina, A.; Keller, T.; Münch, T.A.; Jékely, G. Neuropeptides regulate swimming depth of Platynereis larvae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, E1174–E1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, Y.; Nagata, S. Chapter 93—Crustacean cardioactive peptide. In Handbook of Hormones, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 795–797. [Google Scholar]
  53. Meelkop, E.; Temmerman, L.; Schoofs, L.; Janssen, T. Signalling through pigment dispersing hormone-like peptides in invertebrates. Prog. Neurobiol. 2011, 93, 125–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Conzelmann, M.; Williams, E.A.; Tunaru, S.; Randel, N.; Shahidi, R.; Asadulina, A.; Berger, J.; Offermanns, S.; Jékely, G. Conserved MIP receptor-ligand pair regulates Platynereis larval settlement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8224–8229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Clare, A.S.; Matsumura, K. Nature and perception of barnacle settlement pheromones. Biofouling 2000, 15, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Krajniak, K.G. Invertebrate FMRFamide related peptides. Protein Pept. Lett. 2013, 20, 647–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gallus, L.; Ferrando, S.; Bottaro, M.; Diaspro, A.; Girosi, L.; Faimali, M.; Ramoino, P.; Tagliafierro, G. Presence and distribution of FMRFamide-like immunoreactivity in the cyprid of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite (Cirripedia, Crustacea). Microsc. Res. Tech. 2009, 72, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gan, Z.; Yuan, J.; Liu, X.; Dong, D.; Li, F.; Li, X. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of deep- and shallow-water barnacle species (Cirripedia, Poecilasmatidae) provides insights into deep-sea adaptation of sessile crustaceans. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, C.; Chin-Sang, I.; Bendena, W.G. The FGLamide-allatostatins influence foraging behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yan, G.; Zhang, G.; Huang, J.; Lan, Y.; Sun, J.; Zeng, C.; Wang, Y.; Qian, P.Y.; He, L. Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Candidate Genes and Pathways Involved in Larval Settlement of the Barnacle Megabalanus volcano. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xu, Z.; Wei, Y.; Guo, S.; Lin, D.; Ye, H. B-type allatostatin modulates immune response in hepatopancreas of the mud crab Scylla paramamosain. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020, 110, 103725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, A.; Liu, F.; Shi, W.; Huang, H.; Wang, G.; Ye, H. C-Type allatostatin and its putative receptor from the mud crab serve an inhibitory role in ovarian development. J. Exp. Biol. 2019, 222 Pt 21, 207985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Christie, A.E.; Miller, A.; Fernandez, R.; Dickinson, E.S.; Jordan, A.; Kohn, J.; Youn, M.C.; Dickinson, P.S. Non-amidated and amidated members of the C-type allatostatin (AST-C) family are differentially distributed in the stomatogastric nervous system of the American lobster, Homarus americanus. Invertebr. Neurosci. 2018, 18, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Webster, S.G. Peptidergic Neurons in Barnacles: An Immunohistochemical Study Using Antisera Raised Against Crustacean Neuropeptides. Biol. Bull. 1998, 195, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 18673470, Type A Allatostatin I. 2022. Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Type-A-Allatostatin-I (accessed on 19 August 2022).
  66. Kitade, S.; Endo, N.; Nogata, Y.; Matsumura, K.; Yasumoto, K.; Iguchi, A.; Yorisue, T. Faint chemical traces of conspecifics delay settlement of barnacle larvae. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 983389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kotsiri, M.; Protopapa, M.; Mouratidis, S.; Zachariadis, M.; Vassilakos, D.; Kleidas, I.; Samiotaki, M.; Dedos, S.G. Should I stay or should I go? The settlement-inducing protein complex guides barnacle settlement decisions. J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 221 Pt 22, 185348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Tegtmeyer, K.; Rittschof, D. Synthetic peptide analogs to barnacle settlement pheromone. Peptides 1988, 9, 1403–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lind, U.; Alm Rosenblad, M.; Hasselberg Frank, L.; Falkbring, S.; Brive, L.; Laurila, J.M.; Pohjanoksa, K.; Vuorenpää, A.; Kukkonen, J.P.; Gunnarsson, L.; et al. Octopamine receptors from the barnacle balanus improvisus are activated by the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist medetomidine. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 78, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dobretsov, S.; Rittschof, D. Love at First Taste: Induction of Larval Settlement by Marine Microbes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Downs, M.; Johnson, P.; Zeece, M. Insects and Their Connection to Food Allergy. EFSA J. 2016, 10, 1016. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang, G.; Yan, G.-Y.; Yang, X.-X.; Wong, Y.-H.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; He, L.-S.; Xu, Y.; Qian, P.-Y. Characterization of Arginine Kinase in the Barnacle Amphibalanus Amphitrite and Its Role in the Larval Settlement. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 2016, 326, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Abramova, A.; Alm Rosenblad, M.; Blomberg, A.; Larsson, T.A. Sensory receptor repertoire in cyprid antennules of the barnacle Balanus improvisus. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ederth, T.; Lerm, M.; Orihuela, B.; Rittschof, D. Resistance of Zwitterionic Peptide Monolayers to Biofouling. Langmuir 2019, 35, 1818–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dickinson, G.H.; Vega, I.E.; Wahl, K.J.; Orihuela, B.; Beyley, V.; Rodriguez, E.N.; Everett, R.K.; Bonaventura, J.; Rittschof, D. Barnacle cement: A polymerization model based on evolutionary concepts. J. Exp. Biol. 2009, 212, 3499–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Jouuchi, T.; Satuito, C.G.; Kitamura, H. Sugar compound products of the periphytic diatom Navicula ramosissima induce larval settlement in the barnacle, Amphibalanus amphitrite. Mar. Biol. 2007, 152, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yan, G.; Sun, J.; Wang, Z.; Qian, P.Y.; He, L. Insights into the Synthesis, Secretion and Curing of Barnacle Cyprid Adhesive via Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analyses of the Cement Gland. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dobretsov, S.; Qian, P.-Y. The role of epibotic bacteria from the surface of the softcoral Dendronephthya sp. in the inhibition of larval settlement. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2004, 299, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lawes, J.C.; Clark, G.F.; Johnston, E.L. Disentangling settlement responses to nutrient-rich contaminants: Elevated nutrients impact marine invertebrate recruitment via water-borne and substrate-bound cues. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 645, 984–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Liang, C.; Ye, Z.; Xue, B.; Zeng, L.; Wu, W.; Zhong, C.; Cao, Y.; Hu, B.; Messersmith, P.B. Self-Assembled Nanofibers for Strong Underwater Adhesion: The Trick of Barnacles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 25017–25025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Yuk, H.; Wu, J.; Sarrafian, T.L.; Mao, X.; Varela, C.E.; Roche, E.T.; Griffiths, L.G.; Nabzdyk, C.S.; Zhao, X. Rapid and coagulation-independent haemostatic sealing by a paste inspired by barnacle glue. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 5, 1131–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Urushida, Y.; Nakano, M.; Matsuda, S.; Inoue, N.; Kanai, S.; Kitamura, N.; Nishino, T.; Kamino, K. Identification and functional characterization of a novel barnacle cement protein. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 4336–4346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kamino, K. Absence of cross-linking via trans-glutaminase in barnacle cement and redefinition of the cement. Biofouling 2010, 26, 755–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yamamoto, H.; Nagai, A. Polypeptide models of the arthropodin protein of the barnacle Balanus balanoides. Mar. Chem. 1992, 37, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Raman, S.; Malms, L.; Utzig, T.; Shrestha, B.R.; Stock, P.; Krishnan, S.; Valtiner, M. Adhesive barnacle peptides exhibit a steric-driven design rule to enhance adhesion between asymmetric surfaces. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 152, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. So, C.R.; Yates, E.A.; Estrella, L.A.; Fears, K.P.; Schenck, A.M.; Yip, C.M.; Wahl, K.J. Molecular Recognition of Structures Is Key in the Polymerization of Patterned Barnacle Adhesive Sequences. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 5172–5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liang, C.; Bi, X.; Gan, K.; Wu, J.; He, G.; Xue, B.; Ye, Z.; Cao, Y.; Hu, B. Short Peptides Derived from a Block Copolymer-like Barnacle Cement Protein Self-Assembled into Diverse Supramolecular Structures. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23, 2019–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Nakano, M.; Shen, J.R.; Kamino, K. Self-assembling peptide inspired by a barnacle underwater adhesive protein. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1830–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Nakano, M.; Kamino, K. Amyloid-like Conformation and Interaction for the Self-Assembly in Barnacle Underwater Cement. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 826–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Neuropeptide related to the biofouling process in barnacles.
Table 1. Neuropeptide related to the biofouling process in barnacles.
PeptideRelated FunctionsAmino Acids SequenceReferences
Pignent depersing hormone (PDH)Regular color change and sensingNSELINSILGLPKVMNDA[57]
Crustacean Cardioactive peptide (CCAP)Control the ecdysis and stomatogastric behaviorPFCNAFTGC[52]
A-type allatostatinRelated to the nutrient state such as lipids usage
regular metabolism
Conserved pentapeptide C-terminal sequence Y/F-X-F-G-L/lamide[60]
B-type allatostatinMuscle control, metabolism regulation, feeding, sleepingWith conserved W(X0) amide at the C-terminus[61]
C-type allatostatinModulating the neuromuscular systemCharacterized by a non-amidated c-terminal pentapeptide PISCF motif[7]
Calcitonin-like diuretic hormone-isoform AMaintain ionic homeostasis of hemolymph during barnacle developmentGFDFGLGRGFSASQAAKHKMGLEAAEFPSGPa
SIFamideTransmitting neural signals and detecting exogenic cues in the settlement processesMGSRCAVRRVAAVLVVALVAMALLAPLTEAGYRKPTFNGSIFGKRAAAAAEAEAAQGLARMCAAAYTVCGFPAE
Tachykinin-relate peptide (TRPs)Feeding-related behavior: food intake and digestion-related functionsPhe–Xaa1–(Gly/Ala)–Xaa2–Arg–NH2 for most TKRPs or Phe–Xaa1–Xaa2–Xaa3–Arg–NH2 for natalisins
The prothoracicotropic hormone (PTTH)Promote larval developmentunsigned[23]
FMRFamide-like peptidesNeurotransmitter in the central nervous system and gut
Neurosecretory role in the sensory function of frontal filament
A group of peptides with N-terminally extended Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-NH2[57]
Some sequences were referred from NCBI (2022) [65].
Table 2. Peptide fragments from barnacles and their modifier homologues related to adhesive and chemosensation.
Table 2. Peptide fragments from barnacles and their modifier homologues related to adhesive and chemosensation.
PeptideAmino Acids SequenceAmide Length (aa)(Inspired) SourceReferences
cMr20-S5 Ac-SKLPCNDEHPCYRKEGGVVSCDCK 24 Mrcp- 20k [88]
cMr20-S6 Ac-KTITCNEDHPCYHSYEEDGVTKSDCDCE 28
Bp1 GSGSVPPPCD 10 Interfacial cement [85]
Bp2 GSKLDLLTDG 10
BCP1 QTGYTRGGAAVSSTGATQGAGS 22 Full-length 19 kDa protein [86]
BCP1C QTGYTRGGAAVSSTGATQGAGSLDLAIDGPGGFKARSK 38
BCP2 AVGNSGVSGSGVSIGDSGFRQKTQT 25
BCP2C AVGNSGVSGSGVSIGDSGFRQKTQTNSEAGSKGTKRA 37
BCP3 TGTQGKGITSGEAVANQKAGAEGG 24
BCP3C TGTQGKGITSGEAVANQKAGAEGGAQRVEAVKYVESDGKNLYKVEKVD 48
BCP4 GTSSSGHKASSSGPGRFITSN 21
BCP4C GTSSSGHKASSSGPGRFITSNEVGTEIKLTTPELD 35
mutBCP1 QTGYTRGGAAVSSTGATQCAGS 22
P1 VPPPSDLSIKSKLKQV 16 Barnacle cp19k [87]
P2 GATKGNAAVTTKGTTSGS 18
P3 GVVKSVVRTPTSVEKK 16
P4 KAAVGDTGLSAVSASADNG 19
P5 LFKNLGKATTEVKTTKDGTKVKTK 24
P6 TAGKGKTGGTATTLQIADANGG 22
P7 VSEKSLKLDLLTDGLKFVKVTEKKQ 25
P8 GTATSSSGHKASGVGHS 17
P9 VFKVLNEAETELELKGL 17
R1-3 RRKYSGILGDLIQVAVIRYY 20 cp52k [89]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Jin, H.; Xu, G.; Lai, R.; Wang, A. Bioactive Peptides from Barnacles and Their Potential for Antifouling Development. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090480

AMA Style

Liu X, Jin H, Xu G, Lai R, Wang A. Bioactive Peptides from Barnacles and Their Potential for Antifouling Development. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(9):480. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xuan, Hui Jin, Gaochi Xu, Ren Lai, and Aili Wang. 2023. "Bioactive Peptides from Barnacles and Their Potential for Antifouling Development" Marine Drugs 21, no. 9: 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop