Is the Grass Always Greener in Suburban Neighborhoods? Outdoors Play in Suburban and Inner-City Neighborhoods
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To map specific places that were reported by children as play areas (henceforth: reported play areas) in both neighborhood types. We hypothesized that suburban children will have more places where they regularly play outdoors compared to inner-city children. This hypothesis was based on a previous analysis of the study area [34,35], showing that the suburban neighborhood provides more supportive infrastructure for OP, such as multiple green open spaces and cul-de-sac streets.
- To explore children’s experience of OP in suburban and inner-city neighborhoods, while describing barriers, facilitators as well as other aspects of OP. This part of the study was exploratory and descriptive by nature, and thus, no specific hypotheses were predetermined.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and GIS Data
2.2. Study Design and Procedure
2.2.1. School Survey
Survey Measures
2.2.2. Mapping Activity and Semi-Structured Interviews
2.3. Analysis Plan
3. Results
3.1. Survey Findings
3.2. Findings from the Mapping Activity and Complementary Semi-Structured Interviews
3.2.1. Reported Play Areas
3.2.2. Findings from Complementary Semi-Structured Interviews:
Play Areas
3.3. Presence/Absence of Other People in Public Space
3.4. Social Norms
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts Interest
References
- Page, A.S.; Cooper, A.R.; Griew, P.; Jago, R. Independent mobility, perceptions of the built environment and children’s participation in play, active travel and structured exercise and sport: The peach project. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schoeppe, S.; Duncan, M.J.; Badland, H.M.; Oliver, M.; Browne, M. Associations between children’s independent mobility and physical activity. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Page, A.S.; Foster, L.J.; Qahwaji, D. Commuting to school—Are children who walk more physically active? Am. J. Prev. Med. 2003, 25, 273–276. [Google Scholar]
- Stone, M.R.; Faulkner, G.E. Outdoor play in children: Associations with objectively-measured physical activity, sedentary behavior and weight status. Prev. Med. 2014, 65, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Janssen, I.; LeBlanc, A.G. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Activ. 2010, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ginsburg, K.R. The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics 2007, 119, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burdette, H.L.; Whitaker, R.C. Resurrecting free play in young children. Arch. Paediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2005, 159, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hillman, M.; Adams, J.; Whitelegg, J. One False Move: A Study of Children’s Independent Mobility; PSI Publishing: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Cleland, V.; Timperio, A.; Salmon, J.; Hume, C.; Baur, L.A.; Crawford, D. Predictors of time spent outdoors among children: 5-year longitudinal findings. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2010, 64, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kimbro, R.T.; Brooks-Gunn, J.; McLanahan, S. Young children in urban areas: Links among neighborhood characteristics, weight status, outdoor play, and television watching. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011, 72, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koplan, J.P.; Liverman, C.T.; Kraak, V.I. Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Ploeg, H.P.; Merom, D.; Corpuz, G.; Bauman, A.E. Trends in australian children traveling to school 1971–2003: Burning petrol or carbohydrates? Prev. Med. 2008, 46, 60–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clements, R. An iinvestigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemp. Issues Early Child. 2004, 5, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, D.; Sallis, J.F.; Kerr, J.; Lee, S.; Rosenberg, D.E. Neighborhood environment and physical activity among youth: A review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011, 41, 442–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Panter, J.R.; Jones, A.P.; van Sluijs, E.M. Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: A review and framework for future research. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2008, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pont, K.; Ziviani, J.; Wadley, D.; Bennett, S.; Abbott, R. Environmental correlates of children’s active transportation: A systematic literature review. Health Place 2009, 15, 849–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saelens, B.E.; Handy, S.L. Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2008, 40, S550–S566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giles-Corti, B.; Timperio, A.; Bull, F.; Pikora, T. Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: Increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2005, 33, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Handy, S.; Cao, X.; Mokhtarian, P. Neighborhood design and children′s outdoor play: Evidence from northern california. Child. Youth Environ. 2008, 18, 160–179. [Google Scholar]
- Sandercock, G.; Angus, C.; Barton, J. Physical activity levels of children living in different built environments. Prev. Med. 2010, 50, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weir, L.A.; Etelson, D.; Brand, D.A. Parents′ perceptions of neighborhood safety and children′s physical activity. Prev. Med. 2006, 43, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holt, N.L.; Spence, J.C.; Sehn, Z.L.; Cutumisu, N. Neighborhood and developmental differences in children’s perceptions of opportunities for play and physical activity. Health Place 2008, 14, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Laxer, R.E.; Janssen, I. The proportion of youth′ physical inactivity attributable to neighbourhood built environment features. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2013, 12, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brockman, R.; Jago, R.; Fox, K.R. Children′s active play: Self-reported motivators, barriers and facilitators. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veitch, J.; Salmon, J.; Ball, K. Individual, social and physical environmental correlates of children′s active free-play: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aarts, M.J.; de Vries, S.I.; van Oers, H.A.; Schuit, A.J. Outdoor play among children in relation to neighborhood characteristics: A cross-sectional neighborhood observation study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2012, 9, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aarts, M.J.; Wendel-Vos, W.; van Oers, H.A.; van de Goor, I.A.; Schuit, A.J. Environmental determinants of outdoor play in children: A large-scale cross-sectional study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2010, 39, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karsten, L.; va Vilet, W. Children in the city: Reclaiming the street. Child. Youth Environ. 2006, 16, 151–167. [Google Scholar]
- Lekies, K.S.; Brensinger, D.B. Childhood nature experiences across residential settings: Rural, suburban, and urban. In Risk, Protection, Provision and Policy, Geographies of Children and Young People; Freeman, C., Tranter, P., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; Volume 12, pp. 68–83. [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, M.; Witten, K.; Kearns, R.A.; Mavoa, S.; Badland, H.M.; Carroll, P.; Drumheller, C.; Tavae, N.; Asiasiga, L.; Jelley, S.; et al. Kids in the city study: Research design and methodology. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carroll, P.; Witten, K.; Kearns, R.; Donovan, P. Kids in the city: Children’s use and experiences of urban neighbourhoods in auckland, new zealand. J. Urban Des. 2015, 20, 417–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baranowski, T.; Thompson, W.O.; Durant, R.H.; Baranowski, J.; Puhl, J. Observations on physical activity in physical locations: Ager gender, ethnicity, and month effects. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 1993, 64, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McKenzie, T.L.; Sallis, J.F.; Nader, P.R.; Broyles, S.L.; Nelson, J.A. Anglo-and mexican-american preschoolers at home and at recess: Activity patterns and environmental influences. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 1992, 13, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moran, M.R. The Relationship between the Built Environment and Active Living. Ph.D. Thesis, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Moran, M.R.; Plaut, P.; Epel, O.B. Do children walk where they bike? Exploring built environment correlates of children’s walking and bicycling. J. Transp. Land Use 2015, 9, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terrell, S.R.E. Mixed-methods research methodologies. Qual. Rep. 2012, 17, 254–280. [Google Scholar]
- Tranter, P.; Whitelegg, J. Children’s travel behaviours in Canberra: Car-dependent lifestyles in a low-density city. J. Transport. Geogr. 1994, 2, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, L.; Engelke, P.; Schmid, T. Health and Community Design: The Impact of the Built Environment on Physical Activity; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Bedimo-Rung, A.L.; Mowen, A.J.; Cohen, D.A. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2005, 28, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rofè, Y.; Feierstein, G.; Zarchin, I. Quantity and quality of public open spaces in Israel. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, Yantai, China, 18–20 August 2012; Volume 165, pp. 177–187. [Google Scholar]
- Corburn, J. Confronting the challenges in reconnecting urban planning and public health. Am. J. Public Health 2004, 94, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hipp, J.R.; Orcoran, J.; Wickes, R.; Li, T. Examining the social porosity of environmental features on neighborhood sociability and attachment. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e84544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities; Random House: New York, NY, USA, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Sallis, J.F.; Glanz, K. The role of built environment in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Future Child. 2006, 16, 89–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Timperio, A.; Ball, K.; Salmon, J.; Roberts, R.; Giles-Corti, B.; Simmons, D.; Baur, L.; Crawford, D. Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2006, 30, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Land Area (sq Km) a | Population ᵇ | Urban Form | Land Uses (Sq Km, Percent) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intersections Density c | Residential Density d | Built Coverage e | Green Open Space | Public Facilities | Retail | ||||
Inner city neighborhoods | Abramovitch * | 0.73 | 15,532 | 134.23 | 17.40 | 0.44 | 0.02 (3.92%) | 0.07 (13.72%) | 0.08 (15.68%) |
Katzanelson | 0.843 | 9805 | 97.25 | 9.67 | 0.38 | 0.06 (9.68%) | 0.08 (12.90%) | 0.03 (4.84%) | |
Rambam | 1.353 | 32,546 | 112.29 | 17.61 | 0.37 | 0.08 (8.17%) | 0.13 (13.19%) | 0.09 (8.85%) | |
Remez | 1.555 | 21,203 | 63.00 | 13.44 | 0.37 | 0.09 (7.68%) | 0.17 (13.68%) | 0.03 (2.71%) | |
Suburban neighborhoods | Chataney Pras Nobel | 1.473 | 5692 | 59.06 | 4.73 | 0.32 | 0.15 (13.63%) | 0.05 (4.54%) | 0.003 (0.27%) |
Neot Ashalim | 0.545 | 8987 | 33.06 | 11.98 | 0.22 | 0.07 (15.41%) | 0.10 (22.29%) | 0.004 (0.91%) | |
Neot Shikma * | 1.262 | 14,297 | 48.33 | 9.80 | 0.25 | 0.32 (32.96%) | 0.16 (16.48%) | 0.01 (1.45%) |
Total Sample | Outdoors Play at - | ||||||||||||
Green Open Space | Public Facility | Street | |||||||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
6% (n = 35) | 24% (n = 136) | 30% (n = 171) | 40% (n = 227) | 23% (n = 134) | 25% (n = 142) | 26% (n = 146) | 26% (n = 146) | 37% (n = 209) | 28% (n = 156) | 18% (n = 98) | 17% (n = 97) | ||
N’ type | Inner-city | 8% (n = 23) | 25% (n = 71) | 28% (n = 78) | 39% (n = 108) | 28% (n = 79) | 22% (n = 63) | 25% (n = 71) | 25% (n = 69) | 43% (n = 117) | 26% (n = 71) | 15% (n = 42) | 16% (n = 45) |
Suburban | 4% (n = 12) | 23% (n = 65) | 32% (n = 93) | 41% (n = 119) | 19% (n = 55) | 28% (n = 79) | 26% (n = 75) | 27% (n = 77) | 32% (n = 92) | 30% (n = 85) | 20% (n = 56) | 18% (n = 52) | |
Model summary | χ2 = 5.43, p = 0.14, n = 569 | χ² =6.62, p = 0.085, n = 568 | χ2 = 6.58, p = 0.087, n = 564 | ||||||||||
Gender | Boy | 5% (n = 15) | 15% (n = 43) | 29% (n = 82) | 51% (n = 147) | 20% (n = 58) | 21% (n = 59) | 27% (n = 77) | 32% (n = 90) | 32% (n = 90) | 27% (n = 75) | 20% (n = 55) | 21% (n = 60) |
Girl | 7% (n = 20) | 33% (n = 93) | 32% (n = 89) | 28% (n = 80) | 27% (n = 76) | 29% (n = 83) | 24% (n = 69) | 20% (n = 56) | 43% (n = 119) | 29% (n = 81) | 15% (n = 43) | 13% (n = 37) | |
Model summary | χ2 = 39.12, p < 0.0001, n = 569 | χ2 = 14.83, p = 0.002, n = 568 | χ2 = 11.18, p = 0.01, n = 560 | ||||||||||
IM | High | 3% (n = 12) | 21% (n = 74) | 31% (n = 107) | 45% (n = 159) | 18% (n = 63) | 26% (n = 91) | 28% (n = 97) | 28% (n = 98) | 28% (n = 97) | 28% (n = 96) | 24% (n = 83) | 20% (n = 69) |
Low | 10% (n = 23) | 29% (n = 61) | 30% (n = 63) | 31% (n = 65) | 33% (n = 70) | 23% (n = 49) | 22% (n = 48) | 22% (n = 47) | 52% (n = 110) | 28% (n = 59) | 7% (n = 14) | 13% (n = 27) | |
Model summary | χ2 = 22.16, p < 0.0001, n = 564 | χ2 = 16.02, p = 0.001, n = 563 | χ2 = 47.05, p < 0.0001, n = 555 | ||||||||||
PEChF | High | 5% (n = 10) | 23% (n = 46) | 25% (n = 51) | 47% (n = 95) | 18% (n = 36) | 25% (n = 5) | 26% (n = 52) | 32% (n = 64) | 29% (n = 58) | 27% (n = 54) | 22% (n = 43) | 22% (n = 44) |
Low | 7% (n = 25) | 25% (n = 87) | 33% (n = 119) | 35% (n = 125) | 27% (n = 95) | 25% (n = 89) | 26% (n = 93) | 22% (n = 79) | 41% (n = 145) | 29% (n = 102) | 15% (n = 52) | 15% (n = 51) | |
Model summary | χ2 = 8.51, p = 0.037, n = 558 | χ2 = 8.85, p = 0.031, n = 558 | χ2 = 12.87, p = 0.005, n = 549 |
Outdoors Play at Least Three Times a Week at - | |||
---|---|---|---|
Park | Public Facility | Street | |
Gender | 2.51 *** (1.70–3.71) | 1.78 *** (1.26–2.52) | 1.57 * (1.08–2.28) |
Independent mobility | 1.65 * (1.12–2.42) | 1.45 * (1.01–2.07) | 2.89 *** (1.90–4.36) |
PEChF | 1.23 ** (1.06–1.43) | 1.17 * (1.01–1.35) | 1.29 *** (1.10–1.52) |
Model summary | χ2 = 40.93, p < 0.0001, n = 554 | χ2 = 22.78, p < 0.0001, n = 554 | χ2 = 49.12, p < 0.0001, n = 545 |
Themes | Subthemes | Selected Quotes |
---|---|---|
1. Play areas | 1.1. Public parks and play grounds | 1.1.1. Facilitator: “That park is spacy and nice and there′s lots of things to do there—work out, swing, slide, and there′s also a labyrinth where you can have some time-out alone and enjoy its beauty or you can play games with friends” (girl, 6th grade, inner-city neighborhood) |
1.1.2. Facilitator: “That park is fun to hang out in, it′s spacy and there′s lots of things to do there—swing, work out, play ball, or just sit on the grass and chat with friends” (girl, 6th grade, suburban neighborhood) | ||
1.1.3. Barrier: “It’s boring in that park, there’s nothing to do there—only 1–2 swings, and some fitness facilities and that’s it I would have wanted to have more play facilities there” (boy, 5th grade, inner-city neighborhood) | ||
1.2. The creation of informal play settings in common areas of residential buildings | 1.2.1. Other: “The tenants in our building turned the buildings shelter into some kind of an indoor playground—they brought old things that they didn′t use anymore (beds, selves, sofas) and when it′s cold outside we play there, and when it′s hot we play in the building′s lobby/entrance hall this way only we (the buildings tenants) can play there because we have the code to enter the building, and other children that we don′t know can′t come in” (girl, 6th grade, inner-city neighborhood) | |
1.2.2. Other: “We have a huge storeroom that we′ve built in our house, where we keep all kinds of big toys (for example, ride on toys) and all of the children of our neighbors come and play with the toys sometimes, when its rainy we met at the storeroom and play tabletop games, and if it′s not rainy we play at the buildings outdoor entrance hall in our building area we can play freely, and nobody tells us what to do, unlike at the park where parents of little children won′t let us play because they are afraid that we′ll hurt their little children. So the park turned into a place for little children, and I have more fun playing in my building than at the park” (girl, 6th grade, inner city neighborhood) | ||
2. Other people | 2.1. Presence/absence of other people (general) | 2.1.1. Facilitator: "That park is safe because there′s always a lot of people out there so if something happens to you, they can give you help” (girl, 5th grade, traditional neighborhood) |
2.1.2. Facilitator: “It′s safe there because there are always people around, so if you fall people can help you there are always people there because there′s a preschool in the area so the teachers can also help you and if, for example, dangerous people come there—they can′t harm you because there are other people in the area that can call the police” (girl, 6th grade, suburban neighborhood) | ||
2.1.3. Barrier: “Usually there are not many people in the streets where I live, so if someone attacks you there won′t be anybody to call for help” (girl, 6th grade, inner-city neighborhood) | ||
2.2. Presence of intimidating groups (older kids) in parks | 2.2.1. Barrier: “Many things happened to kids from my class there (in a recreational facility) for example, some boys from my class went to play there in the afternoon, they put their cellular phones aside, and some older kids came, grabbed their phones and harassed them, but they (the boys from my class) managed to run away, but still, their cellular phones were stolen” (girl, 5th grade, suburban neighborhood) | |
2.2.2. Barrier: “I′m not allowed to walk in that park in the dark it′s either empty, or you have big kids who harass you one time I walked there in the dark and big kids threw detonators at me” (boy, 6th grade, suburban neighborhood) | ||
2.3. Presence of parents/grandparents with young children in parks | 2.3.1. Barrier: “That park is boring and not fun and there are a lot of old people there It bothers me when older people are in the park because they don′t let us have fun—they come with their little children and babies and they take them down the slides, and one time they called the police because we were playing ball and they thought that we didn′t let their children go down the slides” (boy, 5th grade, inner-city neighborhood) | |
2.3.2. Barrier: “In that park the parents or the grandparents of the little children tell us: ′there are little children here, you′re not allowed to play ball, you’re not allowed to be here′, so it turns into a place for small children because we’re not allowed to play there” (boy, 6th grade, inner-city neighborhood) | ||
3. Social norms | 3.1. Low social acceptability of OP | 3.1.1. Barrier: “I′m not allowed to hang out in the streets without notifying my parents about it because my mom tells me that I′m not a ‘street kid′ I′m allowed to play outdoors for something like two hours, but not for all day long ” (girl, 5th grade, inner-city neighborhood) |
3.1.2. Barrier: “There are older kids there that play with fire and do things that are not for our age they are ′street kids′ I don′t like it there there are always kids that curse and harass other kids, one time a boy threw a water balloon with mud at me” (girl, 5th grade, suburban neighborhood) | ||
3.2. Shift from active outdoors to passive indoors leisure | 3.2.1. Other: “We don′t play outdoors anymore, we go out together—for bowling, the movies, or just go out to get ice-cream—we do that instead of meeting at the park to play ball” (girl, 6th grade, suburban neighborhood) | |
3.2.2. Other: “I stopped going to that park because the kids in my class don’t play outdoors anymore, instead, they go visit other kids in their home or go to the movies together” (girl, 6th grade, inner-city neighborhood) |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Moran, M.R.; Plaut, P.; Merom, D. Is the Grass Always Greener in Suburban Neighborhoods? Outdoors Play in Suburban and Inner-City Neighborhoods. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070759
Moran MR, Plaut P, Merom D. Is the Grass Always Greener in Suburban Neighborhoods? Outdoors Play in Suburban and Inner-City Neighborhoods. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(7):759. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070759
Chicago/Turabian StyleMoran, Mika R., Pnina Plaut, and Dafna Merom. 2017. "Is the Grass Always Greener in Suburban Neighborhoods? Outdoors Play in Suburban and Inner-City Neighborhoods" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 7: 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070759