Next Article in Journal
Individual and Interactive Effects of Socio-Ecological Factors on Dengue Fever at Fine Spatial Scale: A Geographical Detector-Based Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Perceived Social Norms in Rural Sanitation: An Explorative Study from Infrastructure-Restricted Settings of South Ethiopia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 14
Issue 7
10.3390/ijerph14070793
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cross-Sectional Study to Determine the Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Virus Infection in High Risk Groups in the Northeast Region of Brazil

by
Jakeline Ribeiro Barbosa
1,2,
Cristianne Sousa Bezerra
1,2,
Filipe Anibal Carvalho-Costa
3,
Carolina Pimentel de Azevedo
1,
Geane Lopes Flores
1,
Jeová Keny Baima Colares
2,4,
Danielle Malta Lima
2,4,
Elisabeth Lampe
1 and
Lívia Melo Villar
1,*
1
Viral Hepatitis Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Programme in Pathology, Federal University of Ceará State, Fortaleza CE 60430-160, Brazil
3
Laboratory of Epidemiology and Molecular Systematics, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil
4
Postgraduate Programme in Medical Sciences, University of Fortaleza, Fortaleza CE 60811-905, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(7), 793; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070793
Submission received: 11 May 2017 / Revised: 30 June 2017 / Accepted: 30 June 2017 / Published: 17 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Global Health)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: HBV (Hepatitis B Virus) and HCV (Hepatitis C Virus) infections are more prevalent in vulnerable populations than the general population. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection in HIV-positive patients (GI), chronic renal failure (CRF) patients (GII) and coagulation disorder individuals (GIII). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2014 to March 2015. Serum samples were tested for markers of hepatitis B and C by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sociodemographic, epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data and accompanying statistical analyses were performed using Epi Info™ 7. Results: A total of 348 individuals were recruited, i.e., 154 HIV-positive, 143 CRF and 51 coagulopathy patients. Among them, more than 66% were men, and the predominant age group was 26–35 years in GI and 56–65 years in GIII. Most patients had more than 8 years of education (66.2% in GI, 60.6% in GIII and 46.1% in GII), with a family income between 100–400 dollars in more than 48% of patients. The prevalence of the HBsAg marker was 3.9%, 7% and 3.9%, total anti-HBc was 28.6%, 55.9% and 31.4%, and anti-HCV was 1.3%, 12.6% and 47% for GI, GII and GIII, respectively. However, the prevalence of anti-HBs was greater than 70% in all groups. Conclusions: This study shows a high prevalence of HBV and HCV among specific groups compared to the general population. Factors such as age, income, number of sexual partners, sexually transmitted disease burden, blood transfusion history or blood products and blood transfusions before 1994 were associated with a higher prevalence for these infections.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) can cause acute and chronic liver disease, which can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure and/or hepatocellular carcinoma [1,2]. An estimated 240 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus, which is defined as testing positive for hepatitis B surface antigen for at least 6 months. Of these cases, more than 686,000 people die every year due to hepatitis B complications, such as cirrhosis and liver cancer [3]. In Brazil, the prevalence of antibodies against HBc (anti-HBc) ranged from 8.1% to 10.3% in the Federal District and the Central-West region, while the prevalence of HBsAg antigen was 0.19% in the Northeast, 0.47% in the Central-West and 0.60% in the Federal District [4].
It is estimated that approximately 130–150 million people worldwide have chronic hepatitis C infection and that approximately 700,000 people die each year from liver disease related to hepatitis C [3]. In Brazil, the prevalence of Hepatitis C antibodies (anti-HCV) was 1.38% in the state capitals of the five macro-regions and the Federal District, and it varied from 0.68% in the Northeast to 2.10% in the North region of the country [5].
HBV and HCV infections are prevalent worldwide, especially in the most vulnerable populations, such as patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) that are on haemodialysis and patients with coagulation disorders compared to the general population [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
HBV and HCV prevalence is high among individuals infected with HIV due to the shared routes of transmission of infection, such as injecting drug use, blood transfusion and sexual intercourse [11,13,15]. In Brazil, the prevalence of HIV/HBV co-infection ranged from 2.8% to 10.3%, while HIV/HCV co-infection ranged from 4.6% to 6.4% [14,16,17]. The high prevalence of co-infected individuals varied according to the specific region of the country [18].
CRF patients are considered high-risk for acquiring HBV and HCV infections because parenteral exposure during the dialysis treatment is a major route of transmission. These infections negatively impact the survival of the haemodialysis patients and those undergoing renal transplant. In Brazil, the prevalence of anti-HBc and HBsAg were 34.1% and 15.4%, respectively, while the prevalence of anti-HCV ranged from 12% to 33.9% in CRF patients [7,8,9,19].
Hereditary coagulopathies are the result of deficiency diseases of one or more plasma clotting proteins. Among the inherited bleeding disorders, haemophilia and Von Willebrand’s Disease (VWD) are the most common. Haemophilia A and B are X-linked recessive bleeding disorders included among rare diseases and caused by mutations in the factor VIII and factor IX genes. Both factors take part in the intrinsic pathway of blood coagulation, and affected individuals have severe, moderate and mild forms of the diseases, which are defined by factor plasma levels [20,21,22]. However, VWD is caused by a decrease in or dysfunction of the protein called Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) and affects both genders. The diversity of mutations results in various clinical manifestations, e.g., platelet dysfunction associated with decreased serum factor VIII levels [21].
Treatment of coagulopathies involves the replacement of deficient clotting factors, which is administered as processed concentrates from blood donors and/or synthesized by the pharmaceutical industry. Clotting factor replacement increases the survival of coagulopathy patients. However, these patients are at an increased risk of infection with HBV and HCV because of multiple blood transfusions and frequent parenteral exposure. In Brazil, the prevalence of HBV infection ranged from 0.7% to 2.3%, while HCV infection ranged from 2.5% to 34.9% in this population [12,22,23].
Brazilian studies to determine the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection are common in the general population, mainly in the Southeast region of the country. However, few studies have been conducted including these specific populations in Northeast Brazil, such as HIV-positive individuals, patients with CRF on haemodialysis and patients with coagulation disorders [17]. Identifying the prevalence of these infections in these more vulnerable groups is critical to diagnose, treat and prevent the spread of these infections. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection in HIV-positive patients, CRF patients on haemodialysis and coagulation disorders in Fortaleza-CE, Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Sampling and Population

A cross-sectional study was conducted during the period of June 2014 to March 2015. Sociodemographic data from subjects were obtained through a questionnaire, including the variables of income, risk behaviour, age, gender, marital status and education.
Three groups included were as follows: I—HIV-infected patients (n = 154); II—patients with CRF on haemodialysis (n = 143); and III—patients with coagulopathy (haemophilia or von Willebrand disease) (n = 51). These groups were recruited, respectively, from a private HIV/AIDS clinic, private haemodialysis clinic and public Hematology and Hemotherapy Center of Ceará city, all of which are located in Fortaleza, Northeast region of Brazil.
The inclusion criteria for the selection of participants were as follows: individuals of both genders, aged 18 years or more and referral to one of the three health service centres involved in this study (group I, II or III). In addition, diagnostic criteria for HIV (group I) was considered, which included individuals who tested positive using the HIV 1/2 STAT-PAK® kit (Chembio Diagnostic Systems Inc., Medford, NY, USA) and who may or may not have undergone antiretroviral treatment for HIV. Group II included CRF patients who were already diagnosed and undergoing haemodialysis treatment in the nephrology clinic. Group III included patients with haemophilia- (A and B) and VWD-type coagulopathies who were diagnosed by clinical and laboratory parameters at the Center of Hematology of Ceará, where patients are monitored since childhood.

2.2. Laboratory Analysis

Blood samples (10 mL) were collected from each subject by venipuncture, centrifuged to obtain serum and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Serum samples were tested for markers of hepatitis B and C by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using commercially available kits. All samples were examined for the presence of HBsAg (Bioelisa® HBsAg, Biokit, Lliçà d’Amunt, Spain), total anti-HBc (anti-HBc Bioelisa®, Biokit), anti-HBs (anti-HBs Bioelisa®, Biokit) and anti-HCV (Murex anti-HCV version 4.0®, DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reactive and indeterminate samples were retested in duplicate and indeterminate results were excluded. Serological tests were performed at the Viral Hepatitis Laboratory of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute—FIOCRUZ.

2.3. Data Analysis

Sociodemographic, epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data were entered Microsoft Access® database (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Statistical analyses were performed using Epi Info™ 7 (Epi Info Software, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA). Prevalence rates in distinct groups were compared with Fisher’s exact test. Results with p values (two-tailed) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

2.4. Ethical Aspects

The Ethics Committee of FIOCRUZ approved this study under the numbers 34049514.7.3006.5258 and 34049514.7.3009.5051. All patients included in the study provided informed consent and study protocols were followed according to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

3. Results

A total of 348 patients were recruited for this study, which included 154 HIV-infected patients, 143 patients with CRF on haemodialysis and 51 patients with coagulopathies, with at least 68% of these patients being men. More than 55% were 26–35 years of age in the HIV group (GI) and coagulopathy group (GIII), while the predominant age was 56–65 years in haemodialysis group (GII) (Table 1).
Regarding marital status, 70.8% of group I and 66.7% of group III were single. However, approximately 50% of group II subjects were married or had a stable union. The education of the participants was greater than 8 years in 66.2% of group I, 60.6% of group III and 46.1% of group II. Of which, more than 48% of participants had a monthly family per capita income between 100 and 400 dollars.
As shown in Table 2, the prevalence of the HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) was 3.9%, 7% and 3.9% for groups I, II and III, respectively. While the prevalence of total anti-HBc marker was 28.6%, 55.9% and 31.4% in GI, GII and GIII, respectively, anti-HBs prevalence was greater than 70% in all groups. The presence of total anti-HBc and anti-HBs, which indicated immunity after HBV infection, was 21.4% (33/154) in group I, 38.5% (55/143) in group II and 29.4% (15/51) in group III.
The prevalence of HCV antibody (anti-HCV) was 1.3% (2/154), 12.6% (18/143) and 47% (24/51) in HIV-positive, CRF-haemodialysis and coagulopathy groups, respectively.
Table 3 shows the prevalence of total anti-HBc antibody in relation to the risk factors for each group, with males being the most prevalent, i.e., 31.1% (41/131) of group I, 56.1% (55/98) of group II 32% (16/50) of group III. The prevalence of total anti-HBc in the respective groups was 36.9% (17/46) in the age range of 36–45 years, 69.4% (25/36) in the age range of 56–65 years, and 50% (6/12) in the range of 36–45 years. There was a statistically significant difference between the frequency of this marker in the different age groups of group II (p = 0.013) and group III (p = 0.025).
Regarding the monthly family per capita income, the highest prevalence of anti-HBc was among individuals without income in group I (50%, 4/8), among individuals with an income higher than $400 in group II (69.4%, 25/36) and among those without income in group III (75%, 3/4, p = 0.059).
Regarding sexual behaviour, men who had sex with men (MSM) had a higher prevalence of total anti-HBc (34.5%, 30/87) in group I, while the highest prevalence of anti-HBc in groups II and III (55.9%, 52/93; 32.6%, 16/49) was among non-MSM subjects. Regarding the number of sexual partners in the previous year, the prevalence of anti-HBc in group I was higher among those who had more than 10 partners (p = 0.003). In group II, anti-HBc was more prevalent among those who had six partners or more. While in group III, it was higher among those who had only one partner in the last twelve months (45%, 9/20). There was no statistically significant correlation between the use of a condom and the frequency of anti-HBc in the groups.
The prevalence of anti-HBc was higher for those individuals with coagulopathy (GIII) who had already undergone blood or plasma transfusion (p = 0.018) and for blood transfusions performed before 1994 (p = 0.076), since testing for anti-HCV became a mandatory component of serological screening conducted at Brazilian blood banks after November 1993.
Table 4 shows the prevalence of anti-HCV according to the socioeconomic and behavioural characteristics of each group; there was a prevalence of 4.3% (1/23) among females and 3.2% (1/131) among males in group II (15.3%, 15/98) and group III (48%, 24/50). The highest age range for anti-HCV was 46–55 years (5.2%, 1/19), 56–65 years (22.2%, 8/36) and 36–45 years (91.6%, 11/12) in GI, GII, and GIII, respectively. Married/stable union individuals and those with 1–8 years of education had a higher prevalence of anti-HCV.
Participants in this study with a monthly family per capita income of less than 100 dollars had a higher prevalence of anti-HCV in group I (6.4%, 1/16) and group II (14.3%, 3/21), while group III had a prevalence of 56% (14/25) among those with incomes of 100 to 400 dollars.
Regarding sexual behaviour, the prevalence of anti-HCV in group II was higher for those who had more numerous sexual partners in the last year, whereas in the case of groups I and III, the prevalence was higher for those with one sexual partner. The absence of a condom during intercourse and the practise of oral/anal intercourse were not statistically significant for anti-HCV positivity in these groups. Although inconsistent condom use presented a significant value of p = 0.062 in group II.
On the other hand, individuals with a sexually transmitted infection had a higher prevalence of anti-HCV in group I (2.9%, 2/69) and group III (80%, 8/10), with a significant p value for the coagulopathy group (p = 0.031).
Regarding individuals who previously received a blood or plasma transfusion, the highest prevalence of anti-HCV was 15.5% (14/90) in group II and 60% (21/35) in group III, in which results for the coagulopathy group were statistically significant (p = 0.004). Moreover, individuals who received blood transfusions prior to 1994 were more inclined to HCV exposure and had an anti-HCV prevalence of 41.2% (7/17) and 64% (16/25), with p = 0.004 for the haemodialysis group (Table 4). On the other hand, the use of injectable drugs had a significant p value (p = 0.064) in group II, albeit not statistically significant.

4. Discussion

In the present study, high HBV and HCV prevalence was found in HIV-positive (GI), haemodialysis CRF (GII), and coagulopathies (GIII) populations compared to the general population. We found HBsAg prevalence of 3.9%, 7% and 3.9%, anti-HBc prevalence of 28.6%, 55.9% and 31.4%, and anti-HCV prevalence of 1.3%, 12.6% and 47% in GI, GII and GII, respectively. Pereira et al. [4,5] showed that the HBsAg prevalence ranged from 0.19% to 0.60%, total anti-HBc prevalence ranged from 8, 1% to 10.3%, and anti-HCV prevalence was 1.38% (ranging from 0.68% to 2.60%) in the general population. In Brazil, the prevalence of hepatitis B and C varies according to the geographical region, risk factors, sociodemographic- and population-based characteristics [4,5].
HBV prevalence in HIV-infected individuals was similar to previous studies [14,16,17,18]. In the Northeast region of Brazil, Távora et al. [17] found a prevalence of HBV/HIV (3.7%) similar to the present study, despite the different profiles of the health services; we recruited individuals from outpatient HIV/AIDS clinics, while subjects in the previous study were recruited from the infectious disease hospital. Having more than five sexual partners per year and previous sexually transmitted infections correlated with HBV exposure probably due to the shared common transmission routes of both HIV and HBV, particularly through the sexual route [17,24]. As such, this highlights the importance of health education and vaccination programmes for this group to prevent the transmission of HBV.
In patients with CRF on haemodialysis, the prevalence of HBsAg (7%) and anti-HBc (55.9%) were higher compared to HIV-infected individuals, which could be due to repeated blood exposure during CRF maintenance therapy [25]. The prevalence of both were higher than the prevalence found in the Southeast region (5.5% of HBsAg and 4% of anti-HBc) [19] and in a multicentre Brazilian study (1.4% of HBV prevalence) [26], but lower than the HBsAg prevalence in the South (10%) [27] and Central-West region (46.7%) [28]. These studies showed variable HBV prevalence rates in CRF population that may have been influenced by differences in organizational structure or the work process at haemodialysis centres, which includes the frequency of hygiene and sterilization of equipment in the dialysis room, reuse of capillaries and distribution of patients according to the number of health professionals [8,27,29,30].
Patients with CRF on haemodialysis who were older and received 100 to 400 dollars in monthly family income had high anti-HBc prevalence. Older individuals could undergo longer haemodialysis periods, which increases the risk of HBV exposure [31]. In addition, these individuals had difficulty to maintain employment due to the length of time spent on haemodialysis and their clinical condition; these subjects typically received social security benefits (sickness benefit) as a source of income [31,32].
Among the coagulopathy group, the prevalence of HBsAg and total anti-HBc was 3.9% and 31.4%, respectively. These results were higher than those found in the South region of Brazil (HBsAg prevalence of 2.9% and prevalence of total anti-HBc of 28.5%) [33,34]. These differences may have been due to the classification of haemophilia and VWD that lead to frequent blood transfusion and a higher risk of exposure to HBV [12,22,23]. In this group, age, history of sexually transmitted disease and blood or plasma transfusion, were associated with a high risk of HBV infection (p < 0.05), which was similar to previous observations [35,36,37].
Regarding HCV infection, low anti-HCV prevalence (1.3%) was found in HIV-infected individuals compared to studies conducted in the Northeast region (5.4%) [17] and Southeast region of Brazil (4.6% and 6.4%) [14,16]; this was probably due to the small number of intravenous drug users enrolled in the present study. In CRF patients, the prevalence of anti-HCV was 12.6% which is lower than that found in studies conducted in the Southeast region (14.8%) [9], Northeast region (52%) [38] and South region of Brazil (13.57%) [39], which could have been the result of different standards of good practice for dialysis services [25,29,39]. In this group, receiving a blood transfusion before 1994 was associated with HCV infection (p = 0.004), as anti-HCV screening in Brazil was initiated in blood banks in 1993 [40].
In coagulopathy patients, anti-HCV prevalence was 47% which is higher than that found in the Southeast region (39.4%) [34], Northeast region (42.2%) [41] and South region of the country (34.16%) [34] and could have been the result of different types of coagulopathy included in each study. The anti-HCV prevalence was 34.9%, 29.7% and 12% in individuals affected by haemophilia A, haemophilia B and VWD, respectively [23]. In this group, a history of sexually transmitted disease and transfusion of blood and/or plasma were associated with high risk of HCV transmission (p < 0.05), which reinforced the view that coagulopathy patients who received multiple blood transfusions or blood products [39] prior to 1994 were most affected by HCV due to the lack of anti-HCV screening in blood banks before that date [35,36].

5. Conclusions

This study showed a high prevalence of HBV and HCV among the specific groups evaluated compared to the general population. Factors such as age, income, number of sexual partners, history of sexually transmitted disease, blood or plasma transfusion and transfusion before 1994 were associated with the higher prevalence of these infections. These data indicated the necessity of continuous diagnosis, follow-up and prevention of HBV and HCV infections in these groups to prevent clinical complications and the spread of these infections.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the health authorities from the recruitment centres health authorities from the recruitment centers for technical support, the Center for Integrated Medical Care of the University of Fortaleza, the PRONEFRON Group, the Outpatient clinic of Hereditary Coagulopathies of the Hematology and Hemotherapy Center of Ceará–Hemoce and, Juliana Custódio Miguel and Elisangela Ferreira da Silva from the Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis (LAHEP/FIOCRUZ) for technical assistance in laboratory testing. This research was supported by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazilian National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ).

Author Contributions

Jakeline R. Barbosa contributed to the study design, administered participant surveys, analysed and interpreted data, and drafted and revised the manuscript. Cristianne S. Bezerra and Filipe A. Carvalho-Costa assisted with the design of the study survey, data collection, data interpretation and manuscript revisions. Carolina Pimentel de Azevedo administered participant surveys, assisted with data collection and reviewed the manuscript. Geane L. Flores assisted with data interpretation and with writing and revising the manuscript. Jeová Keny Baima Colares, Danielle Malta Lima and Elisabeth Lampe participated conceptualization of the study, laboratory tests and manuscript reviews. Lívia Melo Villar conceived the study, managed data acquisition, participated in study design and coordination and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McMahon, B.J. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Semin. Liver Dis. 2004, 24, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Seeff, L.B. The history of the “natural history” of hepatitis C (1968–2009). Liver Int. 2009, 29, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization—WHO. Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C. Updated April 2017. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/en/ (accessed on 5 May 2017).
  4. Pereira, L.M.M.B.; Martelli, C.M.T.; Merchán-Hamann, E.; Montarroyos, U.R.; Braga, M.C.; Lima, M.L.C.; Cardoso, M.R.; Turchi, M.D.; Costa, M.A.; de Alencar, L.C.; et al. Population-based multicentric survey of hepatitis B infection and risk factor differences among three regions in Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 81, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Pereira, L.M.M.B.; Martelli, C.M.T.; Moreira, R.C.; Merchan-Hamman, E.; Stein, A.T.; Cardoso, M.R.A.; Figueiredo, G.M.; Montarroyos, U.R.; Braga, C.; Turchi, M.D.; et al. Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis C virus infection in Brazil, 2005 through 2009: A cross-sectional study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Franchini, M.; Mannucci, P.M. Co-morbidities and quality of life in elderly persons with haemophilia. Br. J. Haematol. 2009, 148, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Edey, M.; Barraclough, K.; Johnson, D.W. Review article: Hepatitis B and dialysis. Nephrology 2010, 15, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Moreira, R.C.; Deguti, M.M.; Lemos, M.F.; Saraceni, C.P.; Oba, I.T.; Spina, A.M.M.; Nascimento-Lima, A.S.; Fares, J.; Azevedo, R.S.; Gomes-Gouvêa, M.S.; et al. HBV markers in haemodialysis Brazilian patients: A prospective 12-month follow-up. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2010, 105, 107–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Leão, J.R.; Pace, F.H.L.; Chebli, J.M.F. Infecção pelo vírus da hepatite C em pacientes em hemodiálise: Prevalência e fatores de risco. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2010, 47, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Joukar, F.; Besharati, S.; Mirpour, H.; Mansour-Ghanaei, F. Hepatitis C and hepatitis B seroprevalence and associated risk factors in hemodialysis patients in Guilan province, north of Iran. Hepat. Mon. 2011, 11, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Kretzer, I.F.; Livramento, A.; Cunha, J.; Gonçalves, S.; Tosin, I.; Spada, C.; Treitinger, A. Hepatitis C worldwide and in Brazil: Silent epidemic—Data on disease including incidence, transmission, prevention, and treatment. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ferreira, A.A.; Leite, I.C.G.; Bustamante-Teixeira, M.T.; Guerra, M.R. Hemophilia A in Brazil—Epidemiology and treatment developments. J. Blood Med. 2014, 5, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brandão, N.A.; Pfrimer, I.A.; Martelli, C.M.; Turchi, M.D. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C infection and associated factors in people living with HIV in midwestern Brazil. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 19, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Flores, G.L.; Almeida, A.J.; Miguel, J.C.; Cruz, H.M.; Portilho, M.M.; Scalioni, L.P.; Marques, V.A.; Lewis-Ximenez, L.L.; Lampe, E.; Villar, L.M. A cross section study to determine the prevalence of antibodies against HIV infection among hepatitis B and C infected individuals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lacombe, K.; Rockstroh, J. HIV and viral hepatitis coinfections: Advances and challenges. Gut 2012, 61 (Suppl. 1), i47–i58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Farias, N.S.I.; Coelho, D.M.; Oliveira, U.B.; Binelli, C.A. Coinfecção pelos vírus das hepatites B ou C e da imunodeficiência adquirida: Estudo exploratório no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil, 2007 a 2010. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2012, 21, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Távora, L.G.F.; Hyppolito, E.B.; Cruz, J.N.M.; Portela, N.M.B.; Pereira, S.M.; Veras, C.M. Hepatitis B, C and HIV co-infections seroprevalence in a northeast Brazilian center. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2013, 50, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Oliveira, S.B.; Merchán-Hamann, E.; Amorim, L.D.A.F. HIV/AIDS coinfection with the hepatitis B and C viruses in Brazil. Cad. Saúde Publica 2014, 30, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Marquesini, G.; Gonçales, N.S.L.; Gonçales Júnior, F.L. Prevalência dos marcadores sorológicos dos vírus da hepatite B (VHB) e da hepatite C (VHC) em hemodialisados. Rev. Panam. Infectol. 2008, 10, 23–27. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mannucci, P.M.; Tuddenham, E.G.D. The haemophiliac—From royal genes to gene therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1773–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Federici, A.B.; Santagostino, E.; Rumi, M.G.; Russo, A.; Mancuso, M.E.; Soffredini, R.; Mannucci, P.M.; Colombo, M. The natural history of hepatitis C virus infection in Italian patients with von Willebrand’s disease: A cohort study. Haematologica 2006, 91, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Brazilian Health Ministry. Secretary of Health Care. General Coordination of Blood and Hemoderivatives. In Profile of Hereditary Coagulopathies in Brazil; Brazilian Health Ministry: Brasília, Brazil, 2015; p. 62. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rezende, S.M.; Pinheiro, K.; Caram, C.; Genovez, G.; Barca, D. Registry of inherited coagulopathies in Brazil: First report. Haemophilia 2009, 15, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kapembwa, K.C.; Goldman, J.D.; Lakhi, S.Y.; Bowa, K.; Vermund, S.H.; Mulenga, J.; Chama, D.; Chi, B.H. HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C in Zambia. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2011, 3, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Halle, M.P.; Choukem, S.P.; Kaze, F.F.; Ashuntantang, G.; Tchamago, V.; Mboue-Djieka, Y.; Temfack, E.; Luma, H.N. Hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immune deficiency virus seroconversion positivity rates and their potential risk factors among patients on maintenance hemodialysis in Cameroon. Iran. J. Kidney Dis. 2016, 10, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Sesso, R.C.; Lopes, A.A.; Thomé, F.S.; Lugon, J.R.; Santos, D.R. Brazilian Chronic Dialysis Survey 2013—Trend analysis between 2011 and 2013. J. Bras. Nefrol. 2014, 36, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Carrilho, F.J.; Moraes, C.R.; Pinho, J.R.R.; Mello, I.M.V.G.C.; Bertolini, D.A.; Lemos, M.F.; Moreira, R.C.; Bassit, L.C.; Cardoso, R.A.; Ribeiro-dos-Santos, G.; et al. Hepatitis B virus infection in Haemodialysis Centres from Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil: Predictive risk factors for infection and molecular epidemiology. BMC Public Health 2004, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Carneiro, M.A.S.; Martins, R.M.B.; Teles, A.S.; Silva, A.S.; Lopes, C.L.; Cardoso, D.D.P.; Vanderborght, B.O.; Yoshida, C.F. Hepatitis C prevalence and risk factors in hemodialysis patients in central Brazil: A survey by polymerase chain reaction and serological methods. Men. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2001, 96, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Santos, M.A.M.; Souto, F.J.D. Infection by the hepatitis C virus in chronic renal failure patients undergoing hemodialysis in Mato Grosso State, central Brazil: A cohort study. BMC Public Health 2007, 7, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chang, J.M.; Huang, C.F.; Chen, S.C.; Daí, C.Y.; Yeh, M.L.; Huang, J.F.; Kuo, H.T.; Chuang, W.L.; Yu, M.L.; Hwang, S.J.; et al. Discrepancy between serological and virological analysis of viral hepatitis in hemodialysis patients. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 11, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zambonato, T.K.; Thomé, F.S.; Gonçalves, L.F.S. Socioeconomic status of patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis in northwestern Rio Grande do Sul—Brazil. J. Bras. Nefrol. 2008, 30, 192–199. [Google Scholar]
  32. Carmo, R.A.; Oliveira, G.C.; Guimarães, M.D.C.; Oliveira, M.S.; Lima, A.A.; Buzek, S.C.; Corrêa-Oliveira, R.; Rocha, M.O.C. Hepatitis C virus infection among Brazilian hemophiliacs: A virological, clinical and epidemiological study. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2002, 35, 589–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fontes, E.M.; Amorim, L.; Carvalho, S.M.; Farah, M.B. Hemophilia care in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica/Pan Am. J. Public Health 2003, 13, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hoepers, A.T.C. Hemofilia no estado de Santa Catarina: Estudo clínico. Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. 2008, 30, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ximenes, R.A.; Figueiredo, G.M.; Cardoso, M.R.; Stein, A.T.; Moreira, R.C.; Coral, G.; Crespo, D.; Santos, A.A.; Montarroyos, U.R.; Braga, M.C.; et al. Population-based multicentric survey of hepatitis B infection and risk factors in the north, south, and southeast regions of Brazil, 10–20 years after the beginning of vaccination. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 93, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ziaee, M.; Namaei, M.H.; Azarkar, G. The prevalence of HTLV-1 and its co-infection with HCV, HBV and HIV in hemophilic patients. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 31, 1246–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kucharska, M.; Inglot, M.; Szymczak, A.; Rymer, W.; Zalewska, M.; Malyszczak, K.; Zaleska-Dorobisz, U.; Kuliszkiewicz-Janus, M. Co-infection of the hepatitis C virus with other blood-borne and hepatotropic viruses among hemophilia patients in Poland. Hepat. Mon. 2016, 16, e35658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Medeiros, M.T.G.; Lima, J.M.C.; Lima, J.W.O.; Medeiros, M.M.C.; Coelho-Filho, J.M.C. Prevalence and associated factors to hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients in Brazil. Rev. Saúde Pública 2004, 38, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sassaki, L.; Bertolini, D.A.; Arraes, S.M.A.A. Soroprevalência da Hepatite C em pacientes sob tratamento de diálise da região de Toledo, Paraná. Arq. Mudi 2006, 10, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n 1.376 de 19 de Novembro de 1993. Available online: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/legislacao#/ (accessed on 17 March 2017).
  41. Silva, L.K.; Silva, M.B.S.; Lopes, G.B.; Rodart, I.F.; Costa, F.Q.; Santana, N.P.; Paraná, R.; Santana, A.; Reis, M.G. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection and HCV genotypes among hemophiliacs in the State of Bahia, northeastern Brazil: Analysis of serological and virological parameters. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2005, 38, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.
VariableHIV Positive (n = 154)CRF α Haemodialysis (n = 143)Coagulopathy (n = 51)
N (%)N (%)N (%)
GenderMale131 (85.0)98 (68.5)50 (98.0)
Female23 (15.0)45 (31.5)1 (2.0)
Age group (years) 18–2523 (14.9)1 (0.7)15 (29.4)
26–3558 (37.7)24 (16.8)19 (37.3)
36–4546 (29.9)27 (18.9)12 (23.5)
46–5519 (12.3)34 (23.8)4 (7.8)
56–657 (4.5)36 (25.2)0 (0.0)
≥66 1 (0.6)21 (14.7)0 (0.0)
Unknown0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (2.0)
Marital statusMarried/stable union 44 (28.6)72 (50.3)17 (33.3)
Single109 (70.8)71 (49.7)34 (66.7)
Unknown1 (0.6)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
EducationIlliterate 2 (1.3)11 (7.7)2 (3.9)
1 to 8 years50 (32.5)66 (46.1)18 (35.3)
>8 years102 (66.2)66 (46.1)31 (60.8)
Monthly family per capita incomezero8 (5.2)4 (2.8)4 (7.8)
<100 dollars16 (10.4)22 (15.4)13 (25.5)
100 to 400 dollars75 (48.7)82 (57.3)25 (49.0)
>400 dollars55 (35.7)35 (24.5)9 (17.6)
α CRF = chronic renal failure.
Table
Table 2. HBV and HCV markers in population studied.
Table 2. HBV and HCV markers in population studied.
VariableHIV-Positive (n = 154)CRF * Haemodialysis (n = 143)Coagulopathy (n = 51)
N (%)N (%)N (%)
Marker of Exposure to HBV
HBsAg reactive6 (3.9%)10 (7.0%)2 (3.9%)
Total anti-HBc reactive44 (28.6%)80 (55.9%)16 (31.4%)
Anti-HBs reactive115 (74.7%)103 (72.0%)37 (72.5%)
Anti-HBc reactive/Anti-HBs reactive33 (21.4%)55 (38.5%)15 (29.4%)
Marker of Exposure to HCV
Anti-HCV reactive2 (1.3%)18 (12.6%)24 (47.0%)
* CRF = chronic renal failure.
Table
Table 3. Prevalence of anti-HBc antibody in population groups with a high risk for HBV infection.
Table 3. Prevalence of anti-HBc antibody in population groups with a high risk for HBV infection.
VariableHIV Reactive (n = 154)p-ValueCRF (n = 143)p-ValueCoagulopathy (n = 51)p-Value
Positive/Tested (% Positive)Positive/Tested (% Positive)Positive/Tested (% Positive)
Gender *
Male41/131 (31.3)0.08455/98 (56.1)116/50 (32.0)1
Female3/23 (13.0)25/45 (55.5)0/1 (0.0)
Age Group (years) **
18–255/22 (22.7)0.6780/1 (0.0)0.0131/15 (6.7)0.025
26–3515/58 (25.9)11/24 (45.8)7/19 (36.8)
36– 4517/46 (36.9)14/27 (51.8)6/12 (50.0)
46–555/19 (26.3)18/34 (52.9)2/4 (50.0)
56–652/7 (28.6)25/36 (69.4)0/0 (0.0)
≥66 0/1 (0.0)12/21 (57.1)0/0 (0.0)
Marital Status *
Married/stable union12/44 (27.3)139/72 (54.2)0.7376/17 (35.3)0.753
Single32/110 (29.1)41/71 (57.8)10/34 (29.4)
Education **
Illiterate 0/2 (0.0)0.8916/11 (54.5)0.4061/2 (50.0)0.570
1 to 8 years11/35 (31.4)28/56 (50.0)1/11 (9.1)
>8 years33/117 (28.2)46/76 (60.5)13/37 (35.1)
Monthly Family per Capita Income **
04/8 (50.0)0.8370/1 (0.0)0.0593/4 (75.0)0.121
<100 dollars3/16 (18.7)10/21 (47.6)4/12 (33.3)
100 to 400 dollars18/75 (24.0)43/82 (52.4)6/25 (24.0)
>400 dollars19/55 (34.5)25/36 (69.4)3/10 (30.0)
Sexual Orientation (Males) *
MSM30/87 (34.5)0.3122/4 (50.0)10/0 (0.0)0.202
Non-MSM10/40 (25.0)52/93 (55.9)16/49 (32.6)
Sexual Partner—Last Year **
111/66 (16.7)0.00340/72 (55.5)0.2679/20 (45.0)0.543
<520/49 (40.8)11/22 (50.0)3/16 (18.7)
6 to 107/15 (46.7)2/2 (100.0)0/4 (0.0)
>103/6 (50.0)3/3 (100.0)1/3 (33.3)
Unknown3/18 (16.7) 24/44 (54.5) 3/8 (37.5)
Condom Use **
Always29/112 (25.9)0.42221/35 (60.0)0.2856/17 (35.3)0.704
Sometimes12/29 (41.4)14/21 (66.7)6/20 (30.0)
Never2/8 (25.0)42/81 (51.8)3/9 (33.3)
Unknown1/5 (20.0) 3/6 (50.0) 1/5 (20.0)
ARV Treatment
Yes6/123 (4.9)0.600
No0/31 (0.0)- -
Unknown12/194 (6.2)
Sexually Transmitted Infection
Yes29/69 (42.0)0.00123/39 (58.9)0.7078/10 (80.0)0.000
No15/84 (17.8)56/102 (54.9)8/40 (20.0)
Unknown
Oral Intercourse
Yes37/115 (32.2)0.09231/54 (57.4)17/25 (28.0)0.537
No6/37 (16.2)34/60 (56.7)8/21 (38.1)
Unknown1/2 (50.0) 15/29 (51.7) 1/5 (20.0)
Anal Intercourse
Yes35/114 (30.7)0.30226/50 (52.0)0.4596/19 (31.6)1
No8/38 (21.0)43/72 (59.7)9/27 (33.3)
Unknown1/2 (50.0) 11/21 (52.4) 1/5 (20.0)
Tattoo
Yes12/42 (28.6)15/13 (38.5)0.2432/6 (33.3)1
No32/112 (28.6)75/130 (57.7)14/44 (31.8)
Unknown0 0 0/1 (0.0)
Piercing
Yes4/15 (26.7)11/2 (50.0)11/2 (50.0)1
No40/139 (28.8)79/141 (56.0)15/47 (31.9)
Unknown0 0 0/2 (0.0)
Transfusion of Blood/Plasma
Yes5/16 (31.2)0.77951/90 (56.7)0.86115/35 (42.8)0.018
No39/136 (28.7)28/51 (54.9)1/15 (6.7)
Unknown0/2 (0.0) 1/2 (50.0) 0/1 (0.0)
Transfusion before 1994
Yes3/8 (37.5)0.56911/15 (73.3)0.16113/25 (52.0)0.076
No1/8 (12.5)39/75 (52.0)2/11 (18.2)
Unknown40/138 (29.0) 30/53 (56.6) 1/15 (6.7)
Attend Manicure
Yes24/94 (25.5)0.46045/80 (56.2)16/20 (30.0)1
No19/59 (32.2)34/62 (54.8)10/30 (33.3)
Unknown1/1 (100.0) 1/1 (100.0) 0/1 (0.0)
Injecting/Inhaled Drug Use
Yes8/34 (23.5)0.5253/8 (37.5)0.4661/6 (16.7)0.649
No36/120 (30.0)76/134 (56.7)15/43 (34.9)
Unknown0 1/1 (100.0) 0/2 (0.0)
CRF = chronic renal failure; * Fisher’s exact test; ** chi-square test for trend.
Table
Table 4. Prevalence of anti-HCV antibody in population groups with a high risk for HCV infection.
Table 4. Prevalence of anti-HCV antibody in population groups with a high risk for HCV infection.
VariableHIV Reactive (n = 154)p-ValueCRF (n = 143)p-ValueCoagulopathy (n = 51)p-Value
Positive/Tested (% Positive)Positive/Tested (% Positive)Positive/Tested (% Positive)
Gender *
Male1/131 (3.2)0.27715/98 (15.3)0.18224/50 (48.0)1
Female1/23 (4.3)3/45 (6.7)0/1 (0.0)
Age Group (Years) α
18–250/22 (0.0)0.3670/1 (0.0)0.3942/15 (13.3)0.474
26–350/58 (0.0)1/24 (4.1)9/19 (47.4)
36–451/46 (2.1)5/27 (18.5)11/12 (91.6)
46–551/19 (5.2)2/34 (5.9)1/4 (25.0)
56–650/7 (0.0)8/36 (22.2)0/0 (0.0)
≥66 0/1 (0.0)2/21 (9.5)0/0 (0.0)
Marital Status *
Married/stable union1/44 (2.3)0.4919/72 (12.5)111/17 (64.7)0.135
Single1/110 (0.9)9/71 (12.7)13/34 (38.2)
Education α
Illiterate 0/2 (0.0)0.1281/11 (9.0)0.1441/2 (50.0)0.404
1 to 8 years1/35 (2.8)11/56 (19.6)6/11 (54.5)
>8 years1/117 (0.8)6/76 (7.9)16/37 (43.2)
Monthly Family Per Capita Income α
Zero0/8 (0.0)0.4810/1 (0.0)0.4124/4 (100.0)0.210
<100 dollars1/16 (6.4)3/21 (14.3)3/12 (25.0)
100 to 400 dollars0/75 (0.0)11/82 (13.4)14/25 (56.0)
>400 dollars1/55 (1.8)3/36 (8.3)3/10 (30.0)
Sexual Orientation (Males) *
MSM1/87 (1.1)11/4 (25.0)0.4950/0 (0.0)1
Non-MSM0/40 (0.0)14/93 (15.0)23/49 (46.9)
Sexual Partner—Last Year α
11/66 (1.5)0.3316/72 (8.3)0.21413/21 (61.9)0.214
<50/49 (0.0)5/22 (22.7)6/16 (37.5)
6 to 100/15 (0.0)2/2 (100.0)1/4 (25.0)
>100/6 (0.0)1/3 (33.3)1/3 (33.3)
Unknown1/18 (5.6) 4/44 (9.1) 3/7 (42.9)
Condom Use α
Always2/112 (1.8)0.1657/35 (20.0)0.0629/18 (50.0)0.938
Sometimes0/29 (0.0)3/22 (13.6)8/19 (42.1)
Never0/8 (0.0)7/81 (8.6)5/9 (55.5)
Unknown0/5 (0.0) 1/5 (20.0) 2/5 (40.0)
Sexually Transmitted Infection
Yes2/69 (2.9)0.2014/39 (10.2)0.7798/10 (80.0)0.031
No0/84 (0.0)14/102 (13.7)15/40 (37.5)
Unknown1 2 1
Oral Intercourse
Yes2/115 (1.7)15/54 (9.2)0.2759/25 (36.0)0.138
No0/37 (0.0)10/60 (16.6)13/21 (61.9)
Unknown0/2 (0.0) 3/27 (11.1) 2/5 (40.0)
Anal Intercourse
Yes1/114 (0.8)0.4387/50 (14.0)0.7808/19 (42.1)0.561
No1/38 (2.6)8/72 (11.1)14/27 (51.8)
Unknown0/2 (0.0) 1/21 (4.8) 2/5 (40.0)
Tattoo
Yes1/42 (2.4)0.4720/13 (0)0.3723/6 (50.0)1
No1/112 (0.9)18/13013/21 (61.9)
Unknown0 0 1/1 (100.0)
Piercing
Yes1/15 (6.6)0.1860/2 (0.0)12/2 (100.00)0.215
No1/139 (0.7)18/141 (12.7)21/47 (44.7)
Unknown0 0 1/2 (50.0)
Transfusion of Blood/Plasma
Yes0/16 (0.0)114/90 (15.5)0.11021/35 (60)0.004
No2/136 (1.5)3/51 (5.9)2/15 (13.3)
Unknown0/2 (0.0) 1/2 (50.0) 1/1 (100.0)
Transfusion before 1994
Yes0/8 (0.0)17/17 (41.2)0.00416/25 (64.0)0.464
No0/8 (0.0)7/73 (9.6)5/11 (45.4)
Unknown2/138 (1.4) 4/53 (7.5) 3/15 (20.0)
Attend Manicure
Yes2/94 (2.1)0.5237/80 (8.7)0.2019/20 (45.0)1
No0/59 (0.0)10/62 (16.1)14/30 (46.6)
Unknown
Injecting/Inhaled Drug Use
Yes1/34 (2.9)0.3933/8 (37.5)0.0643/6 (50.0)1
No1/120 (0.8)15/134 (11.2)20/43 (46.5)
Unknown0/0 (0.0) 0/1 (0.0) 1/2 (50.0)
CRF = chronic renal failure; α Chi-Squared for trend; * Fisher’s exact test.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro Barbosa, J.; Sousa Bezerra, C.; Carvalho-Costa, F.A.; Pimentel de Azevedo, C.; Lopes Flores, G.; Baima Colares, J.K.; Malta Lima, D.; Lampe, E.; Melo Villar, L. Cross-Sectional Study to Determine the Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Virus Infection in High Risk Groups in the Northeast Region of Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070793

AMA Style

Ribeiro Barbosa J, Sousa Bezerra C, Carvalho-Costa FA, Pimentel de Azevedo C, Lopes Flores G, Baima Colares JK, Malta Lima D, Lampe E, Melo Villar L. Cross-Sectional Study to Determine the Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Virus Infection in High Risk Groups in the Northeast Region of Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(7):793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro Barbosa, Jakeline, Cristianne Sousa Bezerra, Filipe Anibal Carvalho-Costa, Carolina Pimentel de Azevedo, Geane Lopes Flores, Jeová Keny Baima Colares, Danielle Malta Lima, Elisabeth Lampe, and Lívia Melo Villar. 2017. "Cross-Sectional Study to Determine the Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Virus Infection in High Risk Groups in the Northeast Region of Brazil" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 7: 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070793

APA Style

Ribeiro Barbosa, J., Sousa Bezerra, C., Carvalho-Costa, F. A., Pimentel de Azevedo, C., Lopes Flores, G., Baima Colares, J. K., Malta Lima, D., Lampe, E., & Melo Villar, L. (2017). Cross-Sectional Study to Determine the Prevalence of Hepatitis B and C Virus Infection in High Risk Groups in the Northeast Region of Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7), 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop