Next Article in Journal
Turnover Intention and Its Related Factors of Employed Doctors in Korea
Next Article in Special Issue
The Analysis of Dental Treatment under General Anaesthesia in Medically Compromised and Healthy Children
Previous Article in Journal
ATR–FTIR Spectral Analysis and Soluble Components of PM10 And PM2.5 Particulate Matter over the Urban Area of Palermo (Italy) during Normal Days and Saharan Events
Previous Article in Special Issue
Early Childhood Oral Health and Nutrition in Urban and Rural Nepal
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Qualitative Study of Child Nutrition and Oral Health in El Salvador

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(14), 2508; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142508
by Priyanka Achalu *,†, Neha Zahid, Dominique N Sherry, Andrew Chang and Karen Sokal-Gutierrez
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(14), 2508; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142508
Submission received: 6 June 2019 / Revised: 27 June 2019 / Accepted: 10 July 2019 / Published: 14 July 2019

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper is a study of child nutrition and aural health in El Salvador. The effects of nutrition transition, economic development, mother's knowledge and practices on oral hygiene were examined.

The focus is interesting, however this is not an article, but a summary of a questionnaire. However, this is not an article, but an enumeration of answers to the questionnaire. A non random selection of answers is highly subjective. In this case, statistical processing must be performed to objectively present the data. 

You described it as "Mothers noted both positive and negative changes in the nutrition and oral health environment since their childhoods." in L240.

What percentage is positive? and negative? What are the regional differences? What percentage of these causes are toothpaste, brushing, knowledge, food, or treatment? Most of the references you cited are also statistically processed. Use the references as a guide for statistical processing.


Author Response

Please see the attached file's section for Reviewer 1. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is interesting but it needs some major revsions.

Materials and Methods:

- the Ethical Committee protocol number is missing (line 59);

- the description of the sample is not clear, it needs to be improved;

- the paper is mssing in description of statistical analysis.

Results:

- this section is too long and the results are not well described, it is a not scientific way to describe results

Discussion

- this section can be improved.

Some references are too old.

-  Methods is lack of statistica anlysis and Ethical committee protocol number, so the esperiment can’t be replied without these details

- Results are to rewritten in a different style, more scientific without citino all the words of the partecipanti

- Discussion is a good section but it seems to be poor, it can be improved


Author Response

Please see the attached file's section with responses for Reviewer 2. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors present a nice, well written qualitative study about the perspectives of mothers in El Salvador regarding the quality of oral health care, changes in generational habits, and access to healthy food choices for their children.  It was interesting to read the contrasting perspectives among the mothers and also have their words quoted directly.  This study was well done.

Please check the attached file for detailed comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached file's section with responses for Reviewer 3. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I personally would like to see more statistical analysis, but this article is better than last time.

Reviewer 2 Report

THE PAPER CAN BE ACCEPTED 

Back to TopTop