Appendix B
Case #1: A truck driver became bogged in a remote location. He abandoned his vehicle at about 15:00 and set out on foot. His body was found the following day, 30 km from the vehicle. It is not known whether the worker waited until evening before setting out on foot, but it is highly likely that he would have set out immediately so that he could follow the road. The dry-bulb temperature at 15:00 on the day when the worker was last seen alive was 42.2 °C, and on the following day the maximum dry-bulb temperature was 44.5 °C. Daily solar exposure was 8.1 kWh·m−2 on the first day and 7.5 kWh·m−2 on the second day. If he started walking straight away, his estimated hourly radiant heat load would be 413 W, in addition to the metabolic heat load of 300 W. Thus, the total evaporative sweat loss would have been well in excess of 1 L/h. Given the limited water supply he set out with, dehydration would soon have developed. The dehydration would have diminished his capacity for sweat production, with the probable consequence of heat storage. Death was almost certainly the result of the combined effects of dehydration and heat stroke. No pre-existing risk factors were identified, and it is therefore probable that in this case the heat stress was a sufficient cause of death: that is, nobody would be expected to survive in such circumstances. Had the worker stayed in the vehicle, with the windows open, his hourly total radiant and metabolic load would have been of the order of 200 W, with a fluid requirement from sweat evaporation of 300 mL/h, lessening with nightfall. With the air-conditioning functioning, fluid requirement would have been negligible. Thus, he would almost certainly have survived had he stayed with the vehicle.
Case #2: A bricklayer died after three days of work in moderately high heat (maximum dry bulb temperature 32.7 °C, solar exposure 470 W), high humidity (maximum dew point 22.5 °C) and mean air velocity 16.3 km/h. He ate almost no food in the four days prior to his death, so that there was a probable intercurrent illness. At autopsy, some lymphocytes were present amongst the myocardial fibres, and viral myocarditis was suspected. The level of heat and humidity suggest that the worker would probably have survived in cooler conditions. The lack of food intake would likely have led to some dehydration, as well as glycogen depletion: these would have been probable contributing factors, as well as the underlying illness, especially if it was myocarditis. Moreover, the deceased’s co-workers were not affected, thus it is highly likely that the intercurrent illness, as well as the lack of oral intake over four days, contributed to the death.
Case #3: A 56-year-old male died collecting donations door-to-door for a charity. He had been working for four days of a heat wave, daily maximum temperatures being 38.0, 41.0, 42.2 and 39.0 °C. Maximum dew point on the day he died was 19.6 °C, i.e., humidity was in the “uncomfortable” range, and daily solar exposure 7.0 kWh·m−2. The coroner’s report indicated that the worker was observed to be walking unsteadily on his feet shortly before he collapsed and died. He was mildly dehydrated, as suggested by the fact that his bladder was almost empty at autopsy. He was paid an incentive bonus on top of base salary, so there was a clear incentive to override the protection of self-pacing. Autopsy showed minimal atherosclerosis of the coronary vessels, and the prior observation of walking unsteadily makes sudden onset of ventricular fibrillation unlikely. Thus, while the oppressive heat conditions and the risk factors of dehydration and compromised self-pacing implicate heat stress as a causal factor, a complete explanation for this death is lacking, given the workload which was moderate only.
Case #4: A 25-year-old soldier died on a training course. For the previous two weeks, he had been engaged in outdoor activity. Temperature and humidity were high. There was no local BOM monitoring station but maximum WBGT measured on-site was 36 °C at 11:40. Work had commenced at 05:00 and continued until a scheduled rest period from 10:00 to 15:00. At 12:25, he had presented to a medic, having vomited and feeling breathless. He had drunk 8 L of fluid since 04:00. His temperature was 37.8 °C but settled to 37.1 °C, and at his request he was allowed to return to work, which he did at 15:30. He became disoriented, lost consciousness and was transferred to hospital with a core temperature of 41.7 °C on admission and died that evening. Serum electrolyte analysis was performed on a blood sample taken when he was admitted to hospital: serum sodium level was 128 mmol/L, which is below the normal range of 135–145 mmol/L, thus indicating hyponatremia. Although there is no indication of other soldiers being affected that day, another had suffered severe heat stroke five weeks before, and other course participants had suffered heat stroke in previous years. The motivation to return to duties implies compromised self-pacing, which is common in a military situation. Although these were only simulated battle conditions, completion of the course was a pre-requisite for promotion. Heat stroke is confirmed by the core temperature of 41.7 °C, so that the extreme conditions undoubtedly contributed to this death. As to why this soldier was affected and others were not, hyponatremia is a probable cause, suggested by the large fluid intake in the morning and his reported breathlessness, and confirmed by the low serum sodium concentration and marked pulmonary congestion noted at autopsy. Although cerebral oedema was not reported at autopsy, the brain weight of 1520 g is above expected value.
Case #5: A 23-year-old male collapsed working as a supermarket trolley boy. It was his fourth day at the job, following chronic unemployment due to a psychiatric disorder for which has was taking clozapine, amisulpride and venlafaxine. There was concern about his ability to perform the work because of his obesity. Maximum air temperature was 30.9 °C, humidity was high (maximum dew point 23.9 °C), moderate air velocity (21 km/h), and high radiant heat exposure (daily solar exposure 8.2 kWh·m−2) He did not eat lunch and worked through the lunch break. He was noted to have a high temperature, but the reading is not recorded. In hospital, the worker developed multiple organ failure and died 12 days later. Likely factors in the death were high radiant heat load, high humidity, compromised self-pacing (probably having been conscious of his job security during this closely monitored trial of work), obesity and lack of fitness. The role of the antipsychotic medication is uncertain.
Case #6. A 38-year-old man died after working on concrete formwork. He was probably acclimatised but this was his first day back after a weekend break. Maximum dB was 41.4 °C, maximum dew point 19.3 °C, and daily solar exposure 8.7 kWh·m−2. He was very muscular and appeared to have been taking “supplements”, but it is not stated what they were, and blood toxicology was not informative. He had become unwell and went to the health centre where a high breathing rate was noted, but temperature was normal (36.1 °C oral). He skipped the evening meal, and at 20:00 became incoherent and unsteady. Oral temperature again was normal. He was transported to hospital but died en route. At autopsy, there was swelling of the internal organs and flattening of the sulci of the brain. Sodium and potassium levels were measured in the vitreous humour and were elevated. Other workers also had found the heat oppressive, but there is no indication that any became unwell. Although normal oral temperature makes a diagnosis of heat stroke unlikely, it is probable that the heavy radiant heat exposure and the high work rate were causal factors in his death. (The inquest in this case has been re-opened.)
Case #7. A 25-year-old male, with a co-worker as passenger, was driving a vehicle which became bogged in a remote location. He and the co-worker left the vehicle, carrying 1.5 L of water. He was found deceased some hours later, 6.7 km from the vehicle. The co-worker was found severely dehydrated soon after: he was rehydrated and survived. The coronial report states that air temperature was 47 °C. The nearest BOM station, 100 km away, recorded a maximum temperature of 43.2 °C. Humidity was low (dew point 12.6 °C), and daily solar exposure 7.6 kWh·m−2. It is thus likely that the mean radiant temperature was close to 80 °C, which would lead to an hourly radiant heat load of 413 W for a person in the open. With an additional metabolic heat load of 300 W from walking, the total heat load of 713 W would require evaporation of more than 1 L/h (disregarding convective heat load). Had he remained in the vehicle with the windows open or had he found some shade to sit in while waiting to be rescued, the hourly heat load would have been 225 W with a fluid requirement of 350 mL; and if he had remained in the vehicle with the air-conditioning on, his fluid requirement would be close to zero. In either case, he would most probably have survived until rescued.
Case #8. A 50-year-old farmer was impaled by farm machinery—caught in his foot—on a warm February day. He was found deceased at 21:30 the following night, i.e., about 30 h from when he was last seen. The coroner found that death was caused by shock and exposure. Maximum air temperature was 34.6 °C on the first day, and daily solar exposure was 7.5 kWh·m−2. On the second day, maximum air temperature was 35.5 °C, and daily solar exposure 7.3 kWh·m−2. The coroner concluded that death probably occurred on the first day. Although heat exposure and the consequent dehydration probably contributed to this death, the primary causes were the impaling injury causing shock and immobility, and that he was not rescued earlier. It is likely that he would have survived longer if the environmental heat levels had been lower, but, even if the accident had occurred on a cool February day, it is not possible to say whether he would have survived for the 30 h between the injury and the arrival of help.
Case #9: A 19-year old male died after performing very heavy work installing insulation in a roof space for about 1.5 h. It was his first day in the job. Maximum dB was 40.5 °C, DP 18.7 °C, but mean hourly solar exposure was only 4.7 kWh·m−2, possibly because of cloud cover. Air speed was low (mean 11 km/h) and work was performed mainly under shade (in the roof space installing insulation). There was pressure to complete the job expeditiously. The one co-worker was unaffected. Heat stroke was confirmed by body core temperature of 40.5 °C and the onset of total organ failure, rhabdomyolysis and coagulopathy. The prime factors were the low air velocity associated with indoor work, which severely limits sweat evaporative capacity. Other factors were high ambient temperature, compromised self-pacing and lack of acclimatisation.
Case #10. A 25-year-old cadet engineer and three other marine personnel were replacing a valve n the engine room of a ship, located in waters close to Vietnam. Work commenced at 08:30. The ambient temperature in that location was said to range 35–50 °C. No meteorological data were available, but the engine room temperature was reported to be 48 °C with high humidity. An air-conditioned retreat area was close by. The cadet engineer had joined the vessel four days previously. At 10:30, he became disoriented and complained of feeling hot. Sweating was absent. A body temperature of 41.5 °C was recorded, with heart rate 166/min, blood pressure 126/69, and shallow laboured respiration. He died at 12:05. Autopsy showed gross cerebral oedema with uncal and tonsillar herniation, and gross oedema of the lungs. There was no mention of other workers being affected. It was thought that the deceased worker had not been taking rest breaks or drinking enough water.
Case #11. A 34-year old male became unwell at the end of a day in furniture removal. It was the third day of a heat wave, but he was only employed occasionally so that this appears to have been his first day working in the heat. Air temperature was 40.1 °C at 15:00, 37.4 °C at 18:00 and 29.3 °C at 21:00. The worker became ill at about 19:00 and was taken to hospital. His highest recorded body temperature was 42.3 °C. He died six hours after admission to hospital. Although he had been assigned relatively light furniture items to carry, it is likely that his workload was moderately heavy. Since a large amount of the work was performed indoors, the radiant heat load would have been much less than for outdoor work. In this case, a critical factor is the greatly reduced air velocity indoors, which reduces the convective heat loss and the capacity to evaporate sweat. The high body temperature confirms the diagnosis of heat stroke, and the high air temperature and the moderately heavy workload being performed largely indoors would have been significant causal factors. The fact that there were fellow workers unaffected suggests that there were personal factors making this worker more vulnerable to heat strain. Self-pacing was compromised: the worker had kept working despite some signs of unwellness earlier in the day. Lack of acclimatisation was another likely factor, this being his first day on this job. The worker was on regular antipsychotic medication, and lack of physical fitness is common in psychiatric illness. The medication was diazepam and quetiapine, and the coroner believed that the quetiapine was a causal factor in this worker’s death. There is some epidemiological evidence that antipsychotic medication can predispose to heat strain (discussed above), although there is limited evidence specifically related to quetiapine. The national Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) has only one record of heat stroke in a person taking quetiapine (it is probably not this worker as it was not a fatal event). Two witnesses mentioned that the worker had drunk a large amount of water, so that dehydration was probably not a factor. Indeed, his serum sodium level was 132 mm/L on admission to hospital (normal range 135–145), but the potassium level was elevated: thus, the hyponatremia was likely not dilutional but a consequence of the general metabolic failure from the hyperthermia (there was also biochemical evidence of renal failure and incipient hepatic failure).
Case #12. A 24-year-old woman visiting Australia on a working visa began work at 10:00 cutting wires on a tomato plantation. She had commenced work on the previous day at a watermelon farm. At 12:30 she complained of feeling hot and thirsty. She became disoriented then lost consciousness and breathing ceased. She did not respond to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Body temperature was not recorded. Air temperature was 31.3 °C at 12:00, with moderate humidity (dew point 18.5 °C with heat index 34 °C. Solar exposure was very high—8.2 kWh·m−2. At autopsy obesity was noted. The lungs were heavy with haemorrhagic oedema. There were two small red puncture marks on the right lower leg, about 0.8 cm apart, suggestive of snakebite.
Case #13. A 72-year-old man was contracted to replace a carpet in one room of a rental property. He commenced working, alone, at 12:30, and was found deceased at 16:03 with a hammer in his hand, suggesting sudden death. Air temperature was 38.1 °C at 12:00 and 35.2 °C at 15:00. Humidity was low (dew point 0 °C and 5 °C respectively), and total daily solar exposure was 8.9 kWh·m−2. There were mild emphysematous changes in the lung. There was evidence of pulmonary hypertension, with right ventricular dilatation and hypertrophy of the right ventricle and septum. Since this was indoor work, the likely low air velocity would have limited his sweat evaporative capacity. The heart condition found at autopsy would have limited his VO2max.