Quality of Life, Social Support, Acceptance of Illness, and Self-Efficacy among Pregnant Women with Hyperglycemia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Subjects
- →
- gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is diagnosed when at least one of the following criteria is met in a 75g Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT): fasting glucose 92–125 mg/dL (5.1–6.9 mmol/L), glucose level at 60 minutes ≥180 mg/dL (10 mmol/L) or glucose level at 2 hours 153–199 mg/dL (8.5–11 mmol/L);
- →
- diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) is diagnosed when at least one of the following criteria is met: fasting glucose over 126 mg/dL (7 mmol/L), glucose level at 2 hours in 75g OGTT ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L), or casual glucose level exceeding 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) with clinical hyperglycemic symptoms [23].
2.2. Assessments
- →
- The study was performed using the diagnostic survey method with questionnaires. The following instruments were used: the World Health Organization Quality of Life—BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), the Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS), the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS), the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and a standardized interview questionnaire designed to record the participants’ characteristics.
- →
- The World Health Organization Quality of Life—BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) test, which allows for evaluating QoL both in healthy and ill individuals in clinical practice, was developed on the basis of the WHOQOL-100 questionnaire. It has been adapted for use in Polish settings by L. Wołowicka and K. Jaracz. It includes 26 items referring to situations experienced by the patient in the previous 4 weeks. Its first 2 items involve the patient’s subjective view of their overall QoL and overall health. The remaining items allow for an assessment of 4 QoL domains: physical (somatic), psychological, social, and environmental. Responses are provided using a 5-item scale for a score of 1 to 5. In each domain, the score is positive, i.e., higher scores reflect a better QoL as perceived by the respondent. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach’s α for each of the scale’s dimensions ranges between 0.54 and 0.91. Cronbach’s α for the entire scale is 0.92 in healthy individuals, and 0.95 in ill individuals [17,19].
2.3. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Karuranga, S.; de Rocha Fernandes, J.; Huang, Y.; Malanda, B. (Eds.) International Diabetes Federation: IDF Diabetes Atlas 2017, 8th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2017; p. 59. [Google Scholar]
- Johns, E.C.; Denison, F.C.; Norman, J.E.; Rebecca, M.; Reynolds, R.M. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanisms, Treatment, and Complications. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 29, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aktün, H.L.; Uyan, B.; Yorgunlar, B.; Acet, M. Gestational diabetes mellitus screening and outcomes. J. Turk. Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2015, 16, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baz, B.; Riveline, J.P.; Gautier, J.F. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Definition, aetiological and clinical aspects. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 174, R43–R51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eades, C.E.; Cameron, D.M.; Evans, J.M.M. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 129, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halperin, I.J.; Feig, D.S. The role of lifestyle interventions in the prevention of gestational diabetes. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2014, 14, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, E.; Janghorbani, M.; Shahshahan, Z. Comparison of risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during early and late pregnancy. Midwifery 2018, 66, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iwanowicz-Palus, G.J.; Zarajczyk, M.; Jakubowska, A.; Bień, A.; Rzońca, E. Most frequent problems of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Pol. J. Public. Health 2016, 126, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Laine, M.K.; Kautiainen, H.; Gissler, M. Short primiparous women are at an increased risk for gestational diabetes mellitus. Public Health 2018, 156, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, P.C.; Hung, C.H.; Chan, T.F.; Lin, K.C.; Hsu, Y.Y.; Tzeng, Y.L. The risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study. Midwifery 2016, 42, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, N.G.; Niznik, C.M.; Yee, L.M. Optimizing postpartum care for the patient with gestational diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 217, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCanse, D.R. Diabetes in pregnancy. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 29, 685–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rönö, K.; Stach-Lempinem, B.; Eriksson, J.G.; Pöyhönen-Alho, M.; Klemetti, M.M.; Roine, R.P.; Huvinen, E.; Andersson, S.; Laivuori, H.; Valkama, A.; et al. Prevention of gestational diabetes with a prepregnancy lifestyle intervention—Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Womens Health 2018, 10, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Mo, M.; Muyiduli, X.; Wang, S.; Li, M.; Jiang, S.; Wu, Y.; Shao, B.; Shen, Y.; et al. The association of gestational diabetes mellitus with fetal birth weight. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2018, 32, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bień, A.; Rzońca, E.; Kańczugowska, A.; Iwanowicz-Palus, G. Factors affecting the quality of life and illness accteptance of pregnant women with diabetes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lefkovits, Y.R.; Stewart, Z.A.; Murphy, H. Gestational diabetes. Medicine 2019, 47, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Study Protocol for the World Health Organization Project to Develop a Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL); Quality of Life Research: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993; pp. 153–159.
- World Health Organization. Report of WHOQOL Focus Group Work; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse World Health Organization. WHOQOL Measuring Quality of Life; Raport Nr WHO/MSA/PSF/97.4; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Koetsenruijtera, J.; van Eikelenbooma, N.; van Lieshouta, J.; Vassilev, I.; Lionis, C.; Todorova, E.; Portillo, M.C.; Foss, C.; Serrano, G.M.; Roukova, P.; et al. Social support and self-management capabilities in diabetes patients: An international observational study. Patient Educ. Couns. 2016, 99, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levy, M.; Burns, R.J.; Deschênes, S.S.; Schmitz, N. Does Social Support Moderate the Association Among Major Depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Functional Disability in Adults with Diabetes? Psychosomatics 2017, 58, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marquez, B.; Anderson, A.; Wing, R.R.; West, D.S.; Newton, R.L.; Meacham, M.; Hazuda, H.P.; Peters, A.; Montez, M.G.; Broyles, S.T.; et al. The Relationship of Social Support with Treatment Adherence and Weight Loss in Latinos with Type 2 Diabetes. Obesity 2016, 24, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araszkiewicz, A.; Bandurska-Stankiewicz, E.; Budzyński, A.; Cypryk, K.; Czech, A.; Czupryniak, L.; Dzida, G.; Dziedzic, T.; Franek, E.; Gajewska, D.; et al. Diabetes and pregnancy. In 2019 Guidelines on the management of diabetic patients. A position of Diabetes Poland. Clin. Diabet. 2019, 8, A61–A64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, U.; Schwarzer, R. Soziale Unterstützung bei der Krankheitsbewältigung. Die Berliner Social Support Skalen (BSSS). Diagnostica 2003, 49, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felton, B.J.; Revenson, T.A.; Hinrichsen, G.A. Skala akceptacji choroby—AIS. In Measurement Instruments in Health Promotion and Psychooncology (Narzędzia Pomiaru w Promocji i Psychologii Zdrowia); Juczyński, Z., Ed.; Pracowania Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego: Warszawa, Poland, 2012; pp. 162–166. [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzer, R.; Jerusalem, M.; Juczyński, Z. Skala Uogólnionej Własnej Skuteczności—GSES. In Measurement Instruments in Health Promotion and Psychooncology (Narzędzia Pomiaru w Promocji i Psychologii Zdrowia); Juczyński, Z., Ed.; Pracowania Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego: Warszawa, Poland, 2012; pp. 89–94. [Google Scholar]
- Nolan, J.A.; McCrone, S.; Azulay, C.I.R. The maternal experience of having diabetes in pregnancy. J. Am. Assoc. Nurse Pract. 2011, 23, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sekhar, S.; Meroz, P.; Ramadevi, Ch.; Mahesh, T. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in gestational diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study in Tertiary Healthcare Centre. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2018, 7, 24–26. [Google Scholar]
- Kalka, D. Quality of life and proactive coping with stress in a group of middle adulthood women with type 2 diabetes. Pol. Psychol. Bull. 2016, 47, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogon, I.; Kasprzak, Z.; Szcześniak, Ł. Perceived quality of life and acceptance of illness in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Menopause Rev. 2017, 16, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rwegerera, G.M.; Moshomo, T.; Gaenamong, M.; Oyewo, T.A.; Gollakota, S.; Rivera, Y.P.; Masaka, A.; Godman, B.; Shimwela, M.; Habte, D. Health-related quality of life and associated factors among patients with diabetes mellitus in Botswana. Alex. J. Med. 2018, 54, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dalfrá, M.G.; Nicolucci, A.; Bisson, T. Quality of life in pregnancy and post-partum: A study in diabetic patients. Qual. Life Res. 2012, 21, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latif, L.; Hyer, S.; Shehata, H. Metformin effects on treatment satisfaction and quality of life in gestational diabetes. Br. J. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. 2013, 13, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholami, A.; Azini, M.; Borji, A.; Shirazi, F.; Sharafi, Z.; Zarei, E. Quality of Life Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Appication of WHOQOL-BREF Scale. Shiraz E-Med. J. 2013, 14, 162–171. [Google Scholar]
- Marquesim, N.A.Q.; Lima, S.A.M.; Costa, R.A.A.; Rodrigues, M.R.K.; Ferraz, G.A.R.; Molina, A.C.; Cassetari, B.F.N.; Rudge, M.V.C.; Calderon, I.M.P. Health Related Quality of Life in Pregnant Women with Diabetes or Mild Hyperglycemia. Int. Arch. Med. 2016, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mautner, E.; Greimel, E.; Trutnovsky, G.; Daghofer, F.; Egger, J.W.; Lang, U. Quality of life outcomes in pregnancy and postpartum complicated by hipertensive disorders, gestational diabetes and preterm birth. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009, 30, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramirez-Vélez, R. Embarazo y calidad vida relacionada con la salud: Estudio transversal. Colomb. Med. 2011, 42, 476–481. [Google Scholar]
- Trutnovsky, G.; Panzitt, T.; Magnet, E.; Stern, Ch.; Lang, U.; Dorfer, M. Gestational diabetes: Womens concerns, mood state, quality of life and treatment satisfaction. J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012, 25, 2464–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmed, N.M.; Fadel, E.A.; Khedr, N.F.H. Stressors and social support among pregnant women. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 2017, 6, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebuza, G.; Kaźmierczak, M.; Mieczkowska, E.; Gierszewska, M. Social support received by primiparae and multiparae in the perinatal period. Med. Biol. Sci. 2016, 30, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skurzak, A.; Kicia, M.; Wiktor, K.; Iwanowicz-Palus, G.; Wiktor, H. Social support for pregnant women. Pol. J. Public Health 2015, 125, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ramkisson, S.; Pillay, B.J.; Sibanda, W. Social support coping in adults with type 2 diabetes. Afr. J. Prim. Health Care Fam. Med. 2017, 9, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iranzad, I.; Bani, S.; Hasanpour, S.; Mohammadalizadeh, S.; Mirghafourvand, M. Perceived social support and stress among pregnant women at health centers of Iran-Tabritz. J. Caring Sci. 2014, 3, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edmonds, J.; Paul, M.; Sibley, L. Type, content, and source of social support perceived by women during pregnancy: Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2011, 29, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdollahpour, S.; Ramezani, S.; Khosravi, A. Perceived social support among family in pregnant women. Int. J. Pediatr. 2015, 3, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azimi, M.; Fahami, F.; Mohamadirizi, S. The relationship between perceived social support in the first pregnancy and fear of childbirth. Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 2018, 23, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirabzadeh, A.; Dolatian, M.; Forouzan, A.S.; Sajjadi, H.; Majd, H.A.; Mahmoodi, Z. Path analysis associations between perceived social support, stressful life events and other psychosocial risk factors during pregnancy and preterm delivery. Iran. Red. Crescent Med. J. 2013, 15, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shishehgar, S.; Dolatian, M.; Majd, H.A.; Teimoun, Z.; Alavi, S.T.; Halvaei, P. Social support and maternal stress during pregnancy: A PATH model. Int. J. Healthc. 2016, 2, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peimani, M.; Monjazebi, F.; Ghodssi-Ghassemabadi, R.; Nasli-Esfahani, E. A peer support intervention in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ. Couns. 2018, 101, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bertolin, D.C.; Pace, A.E.; Cesarino, C.B.; Riberio, R.C.H. M Psychological adaptation to and acceptance of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta. Paul. Enferm. 2015, 28, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besen, D.B.; Esen, A. Acceptance of illness and related factors in Turkish Patients with Diabetes. Soc. Behav. Personal. 2012, 40, 1597–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, A.; Reimer, A.; Kulzer, B.; Icks, A.; Paust, R.; Roelver, K.M.; Kaltheuner, M.; Ehrmann, D.; Krichbaum, M.; Haak, T.; et al. Measurement of psychological adjustment to diabetes with the diabetes acceptance scale. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2018, 32, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Souza, M.S.; Karkada, S.N.; Parahoo, K.; Venkatesaperumal, R.; Achora, S.; Cayaban, A.R.R. Self-efficacy and self-care behaviours among adults with type 2 diabetes. Appl. Nurs. Res. 2017, 36, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kav, S.; Yilmaz, A.A.; Bulut, Y.; Dogan, N. Self-efficacy, depression and self-care activities of people with type 2 diabetes in Turkey. Collegian 2017, 24, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linden, K.; Sparud-Lundin, C.; Adolfsson, A.; Berg, M. Well-Being and Diabetes Management in Early Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber-Rajek, M.; Ciechanowska, K.; Mieszkowski, J.; Niespodziński, B.; Wycech, M.; Perzyńska, A. Impact of mental health resources on the quality of life of patients after stroke. J. Health Sci. 2014, 4, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
- Walker, R.J.; Smals, B.L.; Hernandez-Tejada, M.A.; Campbell, J.A.; Egede, L.E. Effect of diabetes self-efficacy on glycemic control, medication adherence, self-care behaviors, and quality of life in a predominantly low-income, minority population. Ethnicity Dis. 2014, 24, 349–355. [Google Scholar]
Socio-Demographic Data | n | % | |
---|---|---|---|
339 | 100 | ||
Age | 18–25 years | 60 | 17.7 |
26–30 years | 108 | 31.9 | |
31–35 years | 99 | 29.2 | |
36–40 years | 55 | 16.2 | |
>40 years | 17 | 5.0 | |
Marital status | single | 39 | 11.5 |
married | 300 | 88.5 | |
Residence | urban–province capital | 134 | 39.5 |
urban–other | 106 | 31.3 | |
rural | 99 | 29.2 | |
Education | primary or vocational | 120 | 35.4 |
bachelor’s degree | 73 | 21.5 | |
master’s degree | 146 | 43.1 | |
Professional activity | professionally active | 207 | 61.1 |
professionally inactive | 132 | 38.9 | |
Self-reported living conditions | very good | 101 | 29.8 |
good | 180 | 53.1 | |
average/poor | 58 | 17.1 | |
Number of pregnancies | first pregnancy | 128 | 37.8 |
second pregnancy | 117 | 34.5 | |
third or subsequent pregnancy | 94 | 27.7 | |
Time of glucose metabolism disorder diagnosis | before the current pregnancy | 35 | 10.3 |
at first visit at the beginning of pregnancy (before week 12) | 50 | 14.3 | |
between weeks 12 and 23 | 61 | 18.0 | |
at screening between weeks 24 and 28 | 181 | 53.4 | |
after week 28 | 12 | 3.5 | |
Treatment | diabetic diet + exercise | 220 | 64.9 |
diabetic diet + insulin | 119 | 35.1 |
WHOQOL-BREF Domains | M | SD | Me |
---|---|---|---|
General Quality of Life | 3.64 | 0.88 | 4.00 |
General Health | 3.43 | 0.83 | 4.00 |
Physical Health | 12.60 | 1.71 | 12.57 |
Psychological | 14.92 | 2.36 | 15.33 |
Social Relationships | 15.21 | 2.52 | 16.00 |
Environment | 14.88 | 2.35 | 15.00 |
BSSS Scales | M | SD | Me |
---|---|---|---|
Perceived Emotional Support | 3.39 | 0.51 | 3.50 |
Perceived Instrumental Support | 3.52 | 0.58 | 3.75 |
Need for Support | 2.95 | 0.53 | 3.00 |
Support Seeking | 2.99 | 0.66 | 3.00 |
Actually Received Support | 3.53 | 0.53 | 3.80 |
Socio-Demographic Data | General Quality of Life | General Health | Physical Health | Psychological | Social Relationships | Environment | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | ||
Age | 18–25 years (1) | 3.60 | 0.365 (-) | 3.38 | 0.588 (-) | 12.58 | 0.605 (-) | 15.07 | 0.827 (-) | 15.71 | 0.270 (-) | 14.71 | 0.425 (-) |
26–30 years (2) | 3.59 | 3.37 | 12.50 | 14.73 | 14.88 | 14.63 | |||||||
31–35 years (3) | 3.77 | 3.49 | 12.55 | 15.09 | 15.33 | 15.23 | |||||||
36–40 years (4) | 3.64 | 3.55 | 12.95 | 14.82 | 14.98 | 14.96 | |||||||
more than 40 years (5) | 3.35 | 3.29 | 12.54 | 14.94 | 15.53 | 14.71 | |||||||
Marital status | married | 3.67 | 0.154 | 3.46 | 0.178 | 12.65 | 0.179 | 15.03 | 0.043 | 15.27 | 0.148 | 15.00 | 0.023 |
single | 3.44 | 3.23 | 12.25 | 14.10 | 14.74 | 13.92 | |||||||
Residence | urban–province capital (1) | 3.63 | 0.042 | 3.43 | 0.042 | 12.63 | 0.508 (-) | 14.93 | 0.174 (-) | 15.42 | 0.074 (-) | 15.04 | 0.042 |
urban–other (2) | 3.50 | 1–2 | 3.29 | 1–2 | 12.45 | 14.62 | 14.74 | 14.27 | 1–2 | ||||
Rural (3) | 3.81 | 2–3 * | 3.59 | 2–3 * | 12.73 | 15.24 | 15.41 | 15.31 | 2–3 * | ||||
1–3 | 1–3 | 1–3 | |||||||||||
Education | primary or vocational (1) | 3.58 | 0.423 (-) | 3.35 | 0.153 (-) | 12.38 | 0.055 (-) | 14.54 | 0.020 | 14.97 | 0.041 | 14.08 | <0.001 |
bachelor’s degree (2) | 3.59 | 3.37 | 12.45 | 14.74 | 1–2 | 14.81 | 1–2 | 14.62 | 1–2 | ||||
master’s degree (3) | 3.71 | 3.53 | 12.86 | 15.32 | 2–3 | 15.60 | 2–3 * | 15.66 | 2–3 * | ||||
1–3 * | 1–3 | 1–3 * | |||||||||||
Professional activity | professionally active | 3.65 | 0.753 | 3.45 | 0.572 | 12.71 | 0.148 | 15.08 | 0.118 | 15.42 | 0.050 | 15.21 | 0.001 |
professionally inactive | 3.62 | 3.40 | 12.43 | 14.67 | 14.87 | 14.36 | |||||||
Self-reported living conditions | very good (1) | 3.93 | <0.001 | 3.68 | <0.001 | 12.98 | 0.001 | 16.09 | <0.001 | 15.96 | <0.001 | 16.24 | <0.001 |
good (2) | 3.63 | 1–2 * | 3.44 | 1–2 * | 12.60 | 1–2 | 14.63 | 1–2 * | 15.27 | 1–2 | 14.69 | 1–2 * | |
average/poor (3) | 3.16 | 2–3 * | 2.98 | 2–3 * | 11.96 | 2–3 * | 13.80 | 2–3 * | 13.68 | 2–3 * | 13.10 | 2–3 * | |
1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | ||||||||
Number of pregnancies | first pregnancy (1) | 3.73 | 0.327 (-) | 3.52 | 0.294 (-) | 12.78 | 0.293 (-) | 15.41 | 0.008 | 15.72 | 0.013 | 15.24 | 0.073 (-) |
second pregnancy (2) | 3.62 | 3.39 | 12.44 | 14.77 | 1–2 | 14.94 | 1–2 * | 14.74 | |||||
third or subsequent pregnancy (3) | 3.55 | 3.36 | 12.55 | 14.45 | 2–3 | 14.84 | 2–3 | 14.55 | |||||
1–3 * | 1–3 * | ||||||||||||
Treatment | diabetic diet + exercise | 3.71 | 0.049 | 3.46 | 0.369 | 12.64 | 0.562 | 15.12 | 0.032 | 15.25 | 0.671 | 15.03 | 0.121 |
diabetic diet + insulin | 3.51 | 3.38 | 12.53 | 14.55 | 15.13 | 14.61 |
Socio-Demographic Data | Perceived Emotional Support | Perceived Instrumental Support | Need for Support | Support Seeking | Actually Received Support | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | M | p (Post Hoc) | ||
Age | 18–25 years (1) | 3.33 | 0.497 (-) | 3.46 | 0.063 (-) | 2.98 | 0.312 (-) | 3.08 | 0.405 (-) | 3.43 | 0.165 (-) |
26–30 years (2) | 3.36 | 3.46 | 2.92 | 2.97 | 3.52 | ||||||
31–35 years (3) | 3.46 | 3.66 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.64 | ||||||
36–40 years (4) | 3.40 | 3.51 | 2.86 | 2.89 | 3.50 | ||||||
more than 40 years (5) | 3.43 | 3.34 | 2.88 | 2.82 | 3.45 | ||||||
Marital status | married | 3.43 | 0.009 | 3.56 | 0.001 | 2.95 | 0.648 | 2.99 | 0.656 | 3.57 | 0.052 |
single | 3.15 | 3.24 | 2.97 | 2.95 | 3.26 | ||||||
Residence | urban–province capital (1) | 3.50 | <0.001 | 3.61 | 0.005 | 2.96 | 0.001 | 3.05 | 0.012 | 3.60 | <0.001 |
urban–other (2) | 3.22 | 1–2 * | 3.37 | 1–2 * | 2.81 | 1–2 * | 2.83 | 1–2 | 3.35 | 1–2 * | |
rural (3) | 3.44 | 2–3 * | 3.56 | 2–3 | 3.08 | 2–3 | 3.07 | 2–3 | 3.64 | 2–3 * | |
1–3 | 1–3 | 1–3 | 1–3 * | 1–3 | |||||||
Education | primary or vocational (1) | 3.29 | <0.001 | 3.38 | <0.001 | 2.98 | 0.310 (-) | 2.96 | 0.075 (-) | 3.41 | <0.001 |
bachelor’s degree (2) | 3.27 | 1–2 | 3.39 | 1–2 | 2.87 | 2.87 | 3.42 | 1–2 | |||
master’s degree (3) | 3.54 | 2–3 * | 3.70 | 2–3 * | 2.97 | 3.07 | 3.69 | 2–3 * | |||
1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | |||||||||
Professional activity | professionally active | 3.45 | 0.010 | 3.61 | 0.001 | 2.99 | 0.059 | 3.08 | 0.001 | 3.59 | 0.011 |
professionally inactive | 3.30 | 3.39 | 2.88 | 2.85 | 3.44 | ||||||
Self-reported living conditions | very good (1) | 3.58 | <0.001 | 3.77 | <0.001 | 2.99 | 0.005 | 3.06 | 0.001 | 3.72 | <0.001 |
good (2) | 3.40 | 1–2 * | 3.51 | 1–2 * | 3.00 | 1–2 | 3.04 | 1–2 | 3.55 | 1–2 * | |
average/poor (3) | 3.06 | 2–3 * | 3.12 | 2–3 * | 2.75 | 2–3 * | 2.69 | 2–3 * | 3.15 | 2–3 * | |
1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | |||||||
Number of pregnancies | first pregnancy (1) | 3.51 | 0.003 | 3.63 | 0.022 | 3.01 | 0.135 (-) | 3.15 | 0.001 | 3.60 | 0.077 (-) |
second pregnancy (2) | 3.34 | 1–2 * | 3.47 | 1–2 | 2.88 | 2.94 | 1–2 * | 3.54 | |||
third or subsequent pregnancy (3) | 3.30 | 2–3 | 3.43 | 2–3 | 2.96 | 2.83 | 2–3 | 3.43 | |||
1–3 * | 1–3 * | 1–3 * | |||||||||
Treatment | diabetic diet + exercise | 3.41 | 0.582 | 3.56 | 0.083 | 2.99 | 0.039 | 3.02 | 0.213 | 3.55 | 0.336 |
diabetic diet + insulin | 3.37 | 3.45 | 2.87 | 2.93 | 3.49 |
M | SD | Me | |
---|---|---|---|
AIS | 31.37 | 6.38 | 32.00 |
GSES | 31.58 | 4.60 | 30.00 |
WHOQOL-BREF Domains | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Physical Health F = 14.380 p < 0.001 | Psychological F = 47.962 p < 0.001 | Social Relationships F = 25.672 p < 0.001 | Environment F = 38.653 p < 0.001 | |||||||||||||
B | β | t | p | B | β | t | p | B | β | t | p | B | β | t | p | ||
BSSS Subscales | Perceived Emotional Support | 0.362 | 0.107 | 10.312 | 0.190 | 0.390 | 0.084 | 1.276 | 0.203 | 0.872 | 0.175 | 2.334 | 0.020 | 0.945 | 0.203 | 2.943 | 0.003 |
Perceived Instrumental Support | 0.343 | 0.117 | 10.453 | 0.147 | 0.937 | 0.232 | 3.584 | <0.001 | 0.522 | 0.121 | 1.634 | 0.103 | 0.660 | 0.164 | 2.405 | 0.017 | |
Need for Support | −0.213 | −0.065 | −10.027 | 0.305 | −0.219 | −0.049 | −0.953 | 0.341 | 0.145 | −0.030 | −0.516 | 0.606 | −0.335 | −0.075 | −1.393 | 0.165 | |
Support Seeking | 0.067 | 0.025 | 0.380 | 0.704 | 0.139 | 0.039 | 0.719 | 0.473 | 0.275 | 0.072 | 1.163 | 0.246 | 0.145 | 0.040 | 0.715 | 0.475 | |
Actually Received Support | 0.085 | 0.026 | 0.418 | 0.677 | 0.338 | 0.077 | 1.505 | 0.133 | 0.765 | 0.162 | 2.782 | 0.006 | 0.855 | 0.194 | 3.618 | <0.001 | |
AIS | 0.073 | 0.270 | 40.952 | <0.001 | 0.153 | 0.415 | 9.460 | <0.001 | 0.085 | 0.215 | 4.284 | 0.000 | 0.079 | 0.214 | 4.635 | <0.001 | |
GSES | 0.055 | 0.147 | 20.684 | 0.008 | 0.088 | 0.171 | 3.876 | <0.001 | 0.077 | 0.141 | 2.795 | 0.005 | 0.084 | 0.164 | 3.543 | <0.001 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Iwanowicz-Palus, G.; Zarajczyk, M.; Pięta, B.; Bień, A. Quality of Life, Social Support, Acceptance of Illness, and Self-Efficacy among Pregnant Women with Hyperglycemia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203941
Iwanowicz-Palus G, Zarajczyk M, Pięta B, Bień A. Quality of Life, Social Support, Acceptance of Illness, and Self-Efficacy among Pregnant Women with Hyperglycemia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(20):3941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203941
Chicago/Turabian StyleIwanowicz-Palus, Grażyna, Marta Zarajczyk, Beata Pięta, and Agnieszka Bień. 2019. "Quality of Life, Social Support, Acceptance of Illness, and Self-Efficacy among Pregnant Women with Hyperglycemia" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 20: 3941. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203941