Next Article in Journal
Gender Differences in Geriatric Depressive Symptoms in Rural China: The Role of Physical Housing Environments and Living Arrangements
Next Article in Special Issue
Health-Associated Nutrition and Exercise Behaviors in Relation to Metabolic Risk Factors Stratified by Body Mass Index
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Objective and Perceived Access to Food Stores Associated with Intake Frequencies of Vegetables/Fruits and Meat/Fish among Community-Dwelling Older Japanese
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Community-Based Intervention for Improving Medication Adherence for Elderly Patients with Hypertension in Korea
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Barriers and Enabling Factors Affecting Satisfaction and Safety Perception with Use of Bicycle Roads in Seoul, South Korea

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(5), 773; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050773
by Bimala Sharma 1,2, Hae Kweun Nam 3, Wanglin Yan 3 and Ha Yun Kim 2,4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(5), 773; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050773
Submission received: 8 February 2019 / Revised: 22 February 2019 / Accepted: 27 February 2019 / Published: 4 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Collection Health Behaviors, Risk Factors, NCDs and Health Promotion)

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report


A solid and relevant quantitative research on the contribution and role of the bicycle as an individual means of transport in relation to health. Variables can be seen as design principles for the built environment. You refer to a Dutch investigation. The bicycle seems to be in crisis because of the rapid innovation of the bicycle, including e-bike. It is clear that there is a difference between geographical cultures and that this study has the limitation of the typical Korean situation.


Author Response

Dear Reviewer,                                                                                                          

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to you for your time and effort to review our manuscript; and we appreciate your valuable comments that certainly improve the quality of the manuscript. The revisions we made in the manuscript are highlighted in red color.

Reviewers’ Comments

A solid and relevant quantitative research on the contribution and role of the bicycle as an individual means of transport in relation to health. Variables can be seen as design principles for the built environment. You refer to a Dutch investigation. The bicycle seems to be in crisis because of the rapid innovation of the bicycle, including e-bike. It is clear that there is a difference between geographical cultures and that this study has the limitation of the typical Korean situation.


Reply to reviewer

We would like to sincerely acknowledge your time and efforts to review our manuscript.

1.      Yes, we agree bicycle seems in crisis because of the rapid innovation of the bicycle, including e-bike. Although we did not ask about the type of cycle they are using, we have added the points in the discussion section (line,250-253)

2.      We would like to acknowledge for your comments that this study has the limitation of the typical Korean situation. This point has been inclined in the discussion (line,249-250)

 


Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

the contribution is very interesting and significant as for ethical and urban policy purposes it poses.

It is well organised as clear.

The only criticality is the coherence between the contents of the analysis and the health issue, since the latter wasn't adequately developed; just some literature background was provided, but no significant evidence about the relation between cycling and public health.

Some insight could help the paper to be more widely appreciated.

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,                                                                                                          

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to you for your time and effort to review our manuscript; and we appreciate your valuable comments that certainly improve the quality of the manuscript. The revisions we made in the manuscript are highlighted in red color.

 

 

Reviewers’ comments

 

The contribution is very interesting and significant as for ethical and urban policy purposes it poses.

It is well organized as clear.

The only criticality is the coherence between the contents of the analysis and the health issue, since the latter wasn't adequately developed; just some literature background was provided, but no significant evidence about the relation between cycling and public health.

Some insight could help the paper to be more widely appreciated.

 

 

Reply to reviewer’s comment

Thank you so much for your critical analysis and very important comments. We have added public health implication of the study in the discussion section (line, 195-198, 206-209, 221-226, 238-241)

Reference numbers 20-23 and 26 are added

 


Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop