Next Article in Journal
Stand-Biased Desk Intervention on Sleep Quality of High School Students: A Pilot Study Using Tri-Axial Accelerometery
Previous Article in Journal
Homicides during the Barranquilla Carnival, Colombia: A 10 Year Time-Series Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph17010036
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Body Mass Index in Defining Childhood Obesity: Analysis of Cross-Sectional Data from Ghanaian Children

by
Theodosia Adom
1,2,*,
André Pascal Kengne
3,
Anniza De Villiers
4,
Rose Boatin
2 and
Thandi Puoane
1
1
School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
2
Nutrition Research Centre, Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra LG80, Ghana
3
Non-Communicable Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
4
Division of Research Capacity Development, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010036
Submission received: 4 August 2019 / Revised: 6 September 2019 / Accepted: 8 September 2019 / Published: 19 December 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Screening methods for childhood obesity are based largely on the published body mass index (BMI) criteria. Nonetheless, their accuracy in African children is largely unknown. The diagnostic accuracies of the World Health Organization (WHO), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the International Obesity Taskforce (IOTF) BMI-based criteria in defining obesity using deuterium dilution as a criterion method in a sample of Ghanaian children are presented. Methods: Data on anthropometric indices and percent body fat were collected from 183 children aged 8–11 years. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. The overall performance of the BMI criteria was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (AUC). Results: Overall sensitivity of WHO, CDC, and IOTF were 59.4% (40.6–76.3), 53.1% (34.7–70.9), and 46.9% (29.1–65.3) respectively. The overall specificity was high, ranging from 98.7% by WHO to 100.0% by IOTF. The AUC were 0.936 (0.865–1.000), 0.924 (0.852–0.995), and 0.945 (0.879–1.000) by the WHO, CDC, and IOTF criteria respectively for the overall sample. Prevalence of obesity by the WHO, CDC, IOTF, and deuterium oxide-derived percent body fat were 11.5%, 10.4%, 8.2%, and 17.5% respectively, with significant positive correlations between the BMI z-scores and percent body fat. Conclusions: The BMI-based criteria were largely specific but with moderate sensitivity in detecting excess body fat in Ghanaian children. To improve diagnostic accuracy, direct measurement of body fat and other health risk factors should be considered in addition to BMI.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases [1]. Among children, obesity may present significant health and psychological problems including type 2 diabetes, increased risk of developing hypertension, high cholesterol, orthopedic problems, and low self-esteem [1,2]. The adverse health consequences associated with obesity are related to excess body fat, calling for accurate methods for diagnosis, particularly among children. At present, the screening methods for obesity are based largely on the body mass index (BMI), calculated as body weight (in kg) divided by the square of the height (in meters). Despite its inherent limitations to distinguish between fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM), both of which contribute to the BMI [3], BMI has been traditionally used in epidemiological studies as a proxy for adiposity because of its relative simplicity and affordability. Nonetheless, BMI is a measure of excess weight rather that excess body fat and changes with age, gender, and maturation in children [3].
Different BMI criteria have been developed for the classification of weight status. These are: The World Health Organization (WHO) reference [4], derived from the z-score of the mean BMI-for-age after computing standard deviations; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [5], based on the BMI-for-age percentile methodology; and the International Obesity Taskforce (IOTF) [6] definition from the lambda, mu, and sigma (LMS) methodology for the calculation of the z-score.
A number of reference methods are available to measure body fatness including under water weighing, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), total body potassium, air displacement plethysmography, bioelectrical impedance, and isotope dilution method [7]. Some of these methods are limited to laboratory settings, costly, and may not be suitable for children [7,8]. The isotope dilution method is one of the safe, non-invasive methods for body composition assessment that enables measurements of body fat under free-living conditions [8].
Most studies among children and adolescents in Africa apply BMI-based criteria to estimate overweight and obesity [9]. Nonetheless, at the continental level, the diagnostic accuracy of the published BMI references to detect excess body fat among children is largely unknown; only few studies have compared the BMI criteria against a criterion measure of body fat [10,11]. The present study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracies of the three international BMI the CDC, IOTF, and WHO based criteria in defining obesity using deuterium dilution as a criterion method in a sample of Ghanaian primary school children.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a cross-sectional analysis of 8–11-year-old school children in six primary schools in an urban area in Ghana. Data on anthropometric indices and percent body fat were collected.

2.1. Study Population

A convenient sample of 183 children from three private and three public schools in the Adentan Municipality of the Greater Region of Ghana were randomly selected. The participants were a sub-sample from a larger study on childhood obesity involving 543 children from 14 schools comprising 111 girls and 72 boys. Details of the recruitment and selection of participants have been previously described [12].

2.2. Data Collection

2.2.1. Anthropometry

Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with a digital scale (Seca 869, GmbH & Co., Hamburg, Germany). Children were weighed in their school uniforms but asked to remove shoes, socks, watches, sweaters, jackets, and items in the pockets. Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using the Shorr Board (Shorr Productions, Olney, MD). All measurements were done in duplicates. The means of the duplicate measurements were used to compute BMI as body weight (in kilogramme) divided by height (in meters)2. BMI-for-age was calculated and obesity defined as BMI-for-age z-score ≥ +2.0 SD by WHO [4]; BMI-for-age percentile ≥ 95th percentile by CDC [5]; and BMI-for-age z-score ≥ 30 kg/m2 by IOTF adjusted to reflect the cut-off point at age 18 years [6].

2.2.2. Total Body Water for Percent Body Fat Estimation

Body fat of participants was assessed using the deuterium dilution method with Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) following the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) guidelines [13]. Children were asked not to eat for at least two hours prior to data collection. Pre-dose saliva samples were collected after which each child received a dose of given weight of deuterium oxide labelled water (99.8% purity, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc. Andover, MA) based on their body weight [13] to drink. The doses were prepared in batches prior to the study. No food or drinks were allowed during equilibration period. Two additional samples were collected 3 and 3.5 h after drinking the dose. The samples were transported on ice to the laboratory and stored at −20 °C prior to analysis.
Deuterium enrichment of the saliva samples were measured using FTIR (Shimadzu IRPrestige-21, Vienna, Austria) at the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission following IAEA guidelines [13]. Samples were analyzed in duplicates and the mean enrichment for each time point was calculated. Total body water (TBW) was calculated from the mean deuterium enrichment at time zero with the use of a correction factor (deuterium space) for non-aqueous dilution of deuterium oxide using the age-and gender- specific values for the hydration of FFM for children [14]. Where only one time point data was available, that was used to calculate the TBW.
Deuterium space = dose ingested (mg)/deuterium enrichment of saliva (mg/kg)
TBW (kg) = deuterium space/1.041
FFM was computed from the TBW as:
FFM (kg) = TBW (kg)/age-and gender-specific hydration factor
The FM was calculated as the difference between body weight and the FFM and expressed as a percentage of the body weight.
Fat mass = Weight (kg) − FFM (kg); expressed as percentage
There is no universally accepted definition for excess body fat using isotope dilution methods in children. For the purposes of this analysis, excess body fat was defined as body fat >25% for boys and >30% for girls, respectively [15].

2.2.3. Ethical Considerations

Ethics approvals were obtained from the Senate Research Committee of the University of Western Cape (ID NO: 15/5/5) and Ethical Review Committee of the Ghana Health Service (ID NO: GHS-ERC: 01/07/13). Approval was also obtained from the Municipal Education Directorate of the Ghana Education Service and from the heads of participating schools. Since the study involved children under 16 years, written informed consent were obtained from the parents or legal guardians of the children. Verbal assent was given by each participating child after explaining the study.

2.2.4. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed with Stata 13.0 (StataCorp). Results are expressed as means (±SDs) or medians (and 25th–75th percentiles) for continuous variables, while categorical variables are reported as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square test, Student t-test, and the Mann–Whitney U test were used for comparison as appropriate. A Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the relationship between percent body fat and WHO, CDC, and IOTF BMI-for-age z-scores. The performance of the published BMI criteria to discriminate children with excess body fat from those with normal body fat (childhood obesity) was evaluated. The sensitivity (the proportion of children with excess body fat who have high BMI-for-age z-scores), specificity (the proportion of children who do not have excess body fat and who do not have high BMI-for-age z-scores), positive predictive value (proportion of children with high BMI-for-age z-scores who have excess body fat), negative predictive value (proportion of children with low BMI-for-age z-scores who do have excess body fat), and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and area under the curves for the BMI references, were computed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Characteristics and Obesity Prevalence of Children

The descriptive characteristics and prevalence of obesity by the different diagnostic criteria are summarized in Table 1. The median (25th–75th percentiles) age of the study participants was 10 (9–10) years. No significant difference was observed between boys and girls in weight, height, and BMI. However, the girls had significantly higher percent body fat compared to the boys (21.3% vs. 14.7%; p < 0.0001).
Obesity prevalence appears to vary by gender and the criteria used; nonetheless, the differences were not significant. The overall prevalence based on the WHO, CDC, IOTF, and percent body fat determined by the deuterium method were 11.5%, 10.4%, 8.2%, and 17.5% respectively. Across criteria, the overall highest obesity prevalence was by percent body fat measured with the deuterium dilution method; 18.0% girls and 16.7% boys were classified as obese (p = 0.814). Prevalence based on the WHO criteria was 13.9% among boys and 9.9% among girls (p = 0.409). Using the CDC and IOTF cut-offs, the prevalence among boys was 11.1% and 8.3%, and 9.0% and 8.1% among girls respectively. Except for the deuterium method, all diagnostic criteria classified higher proportion of boys as obese compared to girls, although the differences were not significant. There were significant positive correlations between the BMI z-scores and percent body fat (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Across criteria, the correlation coefficient rho (ρ) was 0.638, p < 0.0001, 0.635, p < 0.001, and 0.625, p < 0.0001 for WHO, CDC, and IOTF, respectively. By gender, the corresponding values for WHO, CDC, and IOTF were higher in girls (0.694, 0.713, 0.719, all p < 0.0001) compared to boys (0.550, 0.532, and 0.562, all p < 0.0001).

3.2. Diagnostic Accuracy and Performance of BMI Criteria for Defining Obesity

The diagnostic performance of BMI-based criteria for classifying deuterium method-based obesity is presented in Table 2. The overall sensitivity was 59.4% (40.6–76.3), 53.1% (34.7–70.9), and 46.9% (29.1–65.3) by WHO, CDC, and IOTF criteria, respectively. The sensitivity was high among boys with the WHO criterion 75.0% (42.8–94.5) and low among girls using the CDC and IOTF criteria, 45.0% (23.1–68.5). By contrast, the specificity was high across the criteria in the overall sample ranging from 98.7% (95.3–99.8) by WHO to 100.0 (97.6–100.0) by IOTF. Further, the positive predictive values (PPV) in the overall sample ranged from 90.5% (69.6–98.8) by WHO to 100.0% (80.5–100.0) by IOTF. The negative predictive values (NPV) were higher with WHO-based criterion; 91.9% (86.7–95.7) and 89.9% (84.3–94.0) by IOTF. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were similar across all criteria by gender.
The overall accuracy and performance analysis of the BMI-for-age z-score and BMI-for-age percentiles in identifying obese children is indicated by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). The AUC areas were 0.936 (0.865–1.000), 0.924 (0.852–0.995), and 0.945 (0.879–1.000) by the WHO, CDC, and IOTF criteria, respectively, for the overall sample (Figure 4). The AUC did not differ in the overall sample and by gender (Supplementary Figures S1–S3) for all criteria.

3.3. Empirical Cut-Point Estimation for Defining Obesity

Using the Youden index J point approach of the empirical cut-point estimation (Table 3), the WHO, CDC, and IOTF cut-points that optimize sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for obesity were 0.68, 69.5%, and 0.50 respectively for the overall sample. The corresponding optimal cut-offs by gender were 0.86, 87.5%, and 0.50 for boys; and 0.68, 69.5%, and 0.50 for girls.

4. Discussion

This study provides the findings of the accuracy of the published BMI z-score for WHO, CDC, and IOTF to detect excess body fat in pre-adolescent school children in sub-Saharan Africa. The results show that BMI as an indicator of obesity had high specificity with mostly high predictive values across diagnostic criteria. Nonetheless, none of the published criteria achieved optimal rates of sensitivity. Across criteria, at least 40% of the children who were obese were misclassified. Area under the ROC curve indicated that BMI is an acceptable tool for diagnosing excess body fat. Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of the WHO, CDC, and IOTF references were similar across the overall samples and also when stratified by gender. We observed positive correlations between the deuterium-derived percent body fat and the published BMI z-scores. Furthermore, the optimal BMI cut-off points for defining obesity, as determined for the present sample were lower; 0.86 for boys, 0.68 for both girls, and overall by WHO reference; 87.5% for boys, 69.5% for both girls, and overall samples by CDC reference; and 0.50 for boys, girls, and overall sample by IOTF reference.
Several factors are known to influence the diagnostic performance of BMI-based criteria to detect excess body fat. These include the methods of body composition assessment, the cut-offs to define excess percent body fat in the evaluation of the BMI-criteria, and characteristics of the reference population such as ethnicity, maturity, and gender [16,17,18,19,20]. The low-to-moderate sensitivity and high specificity reported in the present study are generally consistent with the literature [11,17,21,22,23,24]. Furthermore, BMI underestimated adiposity in South Asian children while among children of African origin, body fat was overestimated [18,19]. The present results are contrasting to the findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of BMI, where a pooled sensitivity of 73.0% and specificity of 93.0% were reported [25].
Although the methodologies for assessing body fat may differ, many studies have consistently reported low sensitivity of IOTF criterion compared with other criteria for diagnosing childhood obesity [17,23,26,27]. For example, using multisite skinfold thicknesses as the measure of body fat, Zimmermann et al. [23] found that IOTF criterion had low sensitivity relative to the CDC in a national sample of 6–12 year old Swiss children. Deurenberg-Yap et al. [17] also observed lower overall prevalence of obesity by IOTF criterion compared to CDC criterion in Asian adolescents. In another study, BMI percentiles had low sensitivity but high specificity in Italian school children aged 8–12 years [22]. On the other hand, BMI showed higher sensitivities and moderate specificities in Brazilian children aged 7–12 years. The authors further observed that the WHO-based criterion was the least sensitive compared to the IOTF [28], contrary to the present study where the IOTF was least sensitive. Among African children, the evidence is limited. A 2018 pooled analysis of data from a relatively large sample of African school children aged 8–11 years from eight countries reported low sensitivity (29.7%) and high specificity (99.7%) for the WHO BMI definition [11], using deuterium oxide method as reference criterion for body fat [11]. In comparison to the aforementioned African study, the present study reported higher sensitivity (59.4%) but with similar specificity (98.7%).
The strong positive correlations observed between BMI and percent body fat was similar to the results from previous studies [26,29,30,31]. In a cohort of Swiss school children aged 8–11 years, BMI and body fat were highly correlated particularly in the upper half of the BMI regardless of gender, suggesting that BMI is a good proxy for body fat in children with higher BMI. The authors concluded that BMI could be a good surrogate for body fat in pre-pubertal children [29]. Results from studies that applied body fat derived from deuterium oxide are inconsistent. While the present results echo those among Moroccan adolescents [31], they are contrary to results among Brazilian [32], Australian, and Sri Lankan children [33], where low to moderate associations between body fat and BMI indices were found. Contrary to findings from previous studies [16,17,21], we did not find differences between boys and girls with respect to indices of diagnostic accuracy, although boys tended to have higher values relative to girls.
In comparison to the published BMI cut-offs to diagnose obesity, the optimal cut-offs for the present sample were lower across all criteria. This is not surprising given that the BMI reference cut-offs were generated from diverse populations. The present results suggest that it is appropriate to develop country- and population-specific BMI cut-offs to improve diagnosis of childhood obesity instead of the universal references. For example while the present cut-offs for WHO (0.86 for boys and 0.68 for girls) is similar to that reported in an African sample [11], in an Asian population the corresponding cut-offs were 1.86 for boys and 1.38 for girls [17].
These findings have public health implications in the management of childhood obesity. In adults, low to normal BMI with increased body fat is associated with an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease [19,34,35]. The results from the present study indicate that many children with normal BMI-for-age z-scores or percentiles had excess body fat hence BMI could be very useful for detecting excess body fat. Nonetheless, where BMI-for-age is the only criterion in screening children, low sensitivity and moderate sensitivity could lead to misclassification. This is because BMI cannot discriminate body fat and FFM (and the high BMI could be due to high FFM and not necessarily excess fat). This misclassification would lead to missed opportunities for interventions.
Strengths of the present study are: This is one of the first studies to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the three commonly used international BMI-based reference criteria to detect obesity in sub-Saharan Africa, with data obtained from primary school children in Ghana. The use of deuterium to assess body fat in the children is another strength of this study. The deuterium dilution technique employed in the study is safe, accurate, and non-invasive for assessing body composition and obtaining data on body fat and FFM. There are limitations of the present study that need to be considered in interpretation of the findings. The prohibitive costs of deuterium dilution techniques precluded recruitment of a random-representative large sample with broader age range and generation of body fat percentiles. Additionally, the present results could only be generalized to children aged 8–11 years. There is currently no definite cut-off for body fat with deuterium technique. However, the criteria used [15] is associated with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and has been consistently used. Moreover, the optimal cut-offs derived in the present study have not been cross-validated in an independent sample.

5. Conclusions

Although not significant, the prevalence of obesity varied with the diagnostic criteria applied. BMI z-scores were related to percent body fat in children aged 8–11 years indicating that BMI could be used as a proxy of body fat in this population for screening purposes. The current BMI references for diagnosing obesity in children are largely specific but less sensitive in Ghanaian children. These apparent limitations should be considered by healthcare professionals in diagnosing children. To improve diagnostic accuracy and minimize misclassification, more than one reference could be employed in addition to the direct assessment of body fat and or other health risk factors where practicable.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/36/s1, Figure S1: Receiver operating characteristics curves for WHO, stratified by gender. Figure S2: Receiver operating characteristics curves for CDC, stratified by gender. Figure S3: Receiver operating characteristics curves for IOTF, stratified by gender.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.A., A.P.K., A.D.V. and T.P.; data curation, T.A., A.P.K., R.B.; formal analysis, T.A., A.P.K.; funding acquisition, T.A. and R.B.; investigation, T.A., R.B.; methodology, T.A., A.P.K., A.D.V., R.B., T.P.; project administration, T.A., R.B., A.D.V., A.P.K., T.P.; resources, T.A., R.B.; software, T.A., A.P.K.; supervision, A.P.K., A.D.V., and T.P.; validation, T.A., A.P.K., A.D.V., R.B., T.P.; visualization, T.A., A.P.K., A.D.V., and T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, T.A.; writing—review and editing, T.A., A.P.K., A.D.V., R.B. and T.P.

Funding

This research was partly funded by the International Atomic Energy Agency, RAF 6042.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the cooperation and support of the schools, teachers, parents, and children during the data collection process. We express our gratitude to the research assistants for their help in data acquisition and laboratory analysis. The administrative support received from the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission is acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reilly, J.J. Health consequences of obesity. Arch. Dis. Child. 2003, 88, 748–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Reilly, J.J.; Kelly, J. Long-term impact of overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence on morbidity and premature mortality in adulthood: Systematic review. Int. J. Obes. 2011, 35, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wells, J.C.K. A Hattori chart analysis of body mass index in infants and children. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2000, 24, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. de Onis, M.; Onyango, A.W.; Borghi, E.; Siyam, A.; Nishida, C.; Siekmann, J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull. World Health Organ. 2007, 85, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kuczmarski, R.; Ogden, C.L.; Guo, S.; Grummer-Strawn, L.; Flegal, K.; Al, E. 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: Methods and development. In Vital Health Statistics; Series 11; Number 246; Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, May 2002; pp. 1–190. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cole, T.J.; Bellizzi, M.C.; Flegal, K.M.; Dietz, W.H. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ 2000, 320, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Goran, M.I. Measurement Issues Related to Studies of Childhood Obesity: Assessment of Body Composition, Body Fat Distribution, Physical Activity, and Food Intake. Pediatrics 1998, 101, 505–518. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Duren, D.L.; Sherwood, R.J.; Czerwinski, S.A.; Lee, M.; Choh, A.C.; Siervogel, R.M.; Chumlea, W.C. Body composition methods: Comparisons and interpretation. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2008, 2, 1139–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Muthuri, S.K.; Francis, C.E.; Wachira, L.J.M.; LeBlanc, A.G.; Sampson, M.; Onywera, V.O.; Tremblay, M.S. Evidence of an Overweight/Obesity Transition among School-Aged Children and Youth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Craig, E.; Reilly, J.; Bland, R. Body fatness or anthropometry for assessment of unhealthy weight status? Comparison between methods in South African children and adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2013, 16, 2005–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Diouf, A.; Adom, T.; Aouidet, A.; El Hamdouchi, A.; Joonas, N.I.; Loechl, C.U.; Leyna, G.H.; Mbithe, D.; Moleah, T.; Monyeki, A.; et al. Body mass index vs deuterium dilution method for establishing childhood obesity prevalence, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Morocco, Namibia, Senegal, Tunisia and United Republic of Tanzania. Bull. World Health Organ. 2018, 96, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Adom, T.; De Villiers, A.; Puoane, T.; Kengne, A.P. Prevalence and correlates of overweight and obesity among school children in an urban district in Ghana. BMC Obes. 2019, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. IAEA. Introduction to body composition assessment using the deuterium dilution technique with analysis of saliva samples by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. IAEA Hum. Health Ser. 2010, 12, 96. [Google Scholar]
  14. IAEA. Assessment of body composition and total energy expenditure in humans using stable isotope technique. IAEA Hum. Health Ser. 2009, 3, 133. [Google Scholar]
  15. Williams, D.P.; Going, S.B.; Lohman, T.G.; Harsha, D.W.; Srinivasan, S.R.; Webber, L.S.; Berenson, G.S. Body Fatness and Risk for Elevated Blood-Pressure, Total Cholesterol, and Serum-Lipoprotein Ratios in Children and Adolescents. Am. J. Public Health 1992, 82, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Neovius, M.G.; Linné, Y.M.; Barkeling, B.S.; Rossner, S.O. Sensitivity and specificity of classification systems for fatness in adolescents. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Deurenberg-Yap, M.; Niti, M.; Foo, L.L.; Ng, S.A.; Loke, K.Y. Diagnostic accuracy of anthropometric indices for obesity screening among asian adolescents. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 2009, 38, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hudda, M.T.; Nightingale, C.M.; Donin, A.S.; Fewtrell, M.S.; Haroun, D.; Lum, S.; Williams, J.E.; Owen, C.G.; Rudnicka, A.R.; Wells, J.C.; et al. Body mass index adjustments to increase the validity of body fatness assessment in UK Black African and South Asian children. Int. J. Obes. 2017, 41, 1048–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nightingale, C.M.; Rudnicka, A.R.; Owen, C.G.; Cook, D.G.; Whincup, P.H. Patterns of body size and adiposity among UK children of South Asian, black African-Caribbean and white European origin: Child Heart And health Study in England (CHASE Study). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 40, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, A.; Byrne, N.M.; Kagawa, M.; Ma, G.; Poh, B.K.; Ismail, M.N.; Kijboonchoo, K.; Nasreddine, L.; Trinidad, T.P.; Hills, A.P. Ethnic differences in the relationship between body mass index and percentage body fat among Asian children from different backgrounds. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 106, 1390–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Reilly, J.J.; Dorosty, A.R.; Emmett, P.M.; Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood Study Team. Identication of the obese child: Adequacy of the body mass index for clinical practice and epidemiology. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2000, 24, 1623–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bedogni, G.; Iughetti, L.; Ferrari, M.; Malavolti, M.; Poli, M.; Bernasconi, S.; Battistini, N. Sensitivity and specificity of body mass index and skinfold thicknesses in detecting excess adiposity in children aged 8–12 years. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2003, 30, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zimmermann, M.B.; Gubeli, C.; Puntener, C.; Molinari, L.; Hess, S.Y.; Hurrell, R.F. Detection of overweight and obesity in a national sample of 6–12-y-old Swiss children: Accuracy and validity of reference values for body mass index from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention anf the International Obesity Task Force. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 838–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gläßer, N.; Zellner, K.; Kromeyer-Hauschild, K. Validity of body mass index and waist circumference to detect excess fat mass in children aged 7–14 years. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 65, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Okorodudu, D.O.; Jumean, M.F.; Montori, V.M.; Romero-Corral, A.; Somers, V.K.; Erwin, P.J.; Lopez-Jimenez, F. Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr. Obes. 2015, 10, 234–244. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nichols, S.D.; Cadogan, F. BMI-based obesity cutoffs and excess adiposity in a Caribbean adolescent population of African origin. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reilly, J.J. Diagnostic accuracy of the BMI for age in paediatrics. Int. J. Obes. 2006, 30, 595–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. da Silva, K.S.; da Silva Lopes, A.; da Silva, F.M. Sensitivity and specificity of different classification criteria for overweight in schoolchildren from João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil. Rev. Nutr. 2010, 23, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dencker, M.; Thorsson, O.; Lindén, C.; Wollmer, P.; Andersen, L.B.; Karlsson, M.K. BMI and objectively measured body fat and body fat distribution in prepubertal children. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 2007, 27, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gómez-Campos, R.; David Langer, R.; de Fátima Guimarães, R.; Contiero San Martini, M.; Cossio-Bolaños, M.; de Arruda, M.; Guerra-Júnior, G.; Moreira Gonçalves, E. Accuracy of body mass index cutoffs for classifying obesity in Chilean children and adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mehdad, S.; Hamrani, A.; El Kari, K.; El Hamdouchi, A.; Barakat, A.; El Mzibri, M.; Mokhtar, N.; Aguenaou, H. Body mass index, waist circumference, body fat, fasting blood glucose in a sample of Moroccan adolescents aged 11–17 years. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012, 510458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bila, W.C.; De Freitas, A.E.; Galdino, A.S.; Ferriolli, E.; Pfrimer, K.; Lamounier, J.A. Deuterium oxide dilution and body composition in overweight and obese schoolchildren aged 6–9 years. J. Pediatr. 2016, 92, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wickramasinghe, V.P.; Cleghorn, G.J.; Edmiston, K.A.; Murphy, A.J.; Abbott, R.A.; Davies, P.S.W. Validity of BMI as a measure of obesity in Australian white Caucasian and Australian Sri Lankan children. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2005, 32, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Romero-Corral, A.; Somers, V.K.; Sierra-Johnson, J.; Korenfeld, Y.; Boarin, S.; Korinek, J.; Jensen, M.D.; Parati, G.; Lopez-Jimenez, F. Normal weight obesity: A risk factor for cardiometabolic dysregulation and cardiovascular mortality. Eur. Heart J. 2010, 31, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. World Health Organization. Public health Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Public Health 2004, 363, 157–163. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 17 00036 g001 550
Figure 1. Correlation between percent body fat measured by the deuterium dilution method and World Health Organization (WHO) body mass index (BMI) z-score. The dots represent percent body fat and the red line represent the fitted values.
Figure 1. Correlation between percent body fat measured by the deuterium dilution method and World Health Organization (WHO) body mass index (BMI) z-score. The dots represent percent body fat and the red line represent the fitted values.
Ijerph 17 00036 g001
Ijerph 17 00036 g002 550
Figure 2. Correlation between percent body fat measured by the deuterium dilution method and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) BMI z-score percentiles. The dots represent percent body fat and the red line represent the fitted values.
Figure 2. Correlation between percent body fat measured by the deuterium dilution method and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) BMI z-score percentiles. The dots represent percent body fat and the red line represent the fitted values.
Ijerph 17 00036 g002
Ijerph 17 00036 g003 550
Figure 3. Correlation between percent body fat measured by the deuterium dilution method and International Obesity Taskforce (IOTF) BMI z-score. The dots represent percent body fat and the red line represent the fitted values.
Figure 3. Correlation between percent body fat measured by the deuterium dilution method and International Obesity Taskforce (IOTF) BMI z-score. The dots represent percent body fat and the red line represent the fitted values.
Ijerph 17 00036 g003
Ijerph 17 00036 g004 550
Figure 4. Receiver operating characteristics curve for WHO, CDC, and IOTF criteria. Long broken forest green line: ROC area for IOTF, AUC = 0.945. Dash navy line: ROC area for WHO, AUC = 0.936. Solid maroon line: ROC area for CDC, AUC = 0.924. Diagonal line: ROC area for reference, AUC = 0.500.
Figure 4. Receiver operating characteristics curve for WHO, CDC, and IOTF criteria. Long broken forest green line: ROC area for IOTF, AUC = 0.945. Dash navy line: ROC area for WHO, AUC = 0.936. Solid maroon line: ROC area for CDC, AUC = 0.924. Diagonal line: ROC area for reference, AUC = 0.500.
Ijerph 17 00036 g004
Table
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics and obesity prevalence of children based on different diagnostic criteria.
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics and obesity prevalence of children based on different diagnostic criteria.
VariablesOverall (N = 183)Boys (N = 72)Girls (N = 111)p-Value
Median age (y)10 (9, 10)10.0 (9, 10)10.0 (9, 10)
Median Weight (kg)30.7 (27.2, 37.5)29.9 (27.5, 34.9)31.3 (27.1, 39.1)0.339
Mean height (cm)139.5 ± 8.2138 ± 7.2140.1 ± 8.810.232
Median BMI (kg/m2)15.7 (14.8, 18.0)15.5 (14.8, 17.1)16.0 (14.5, 18.7)0.617
Median BMI z-score−0.40 (−1.09, 0.63)−0.51 (−1.08, 0.19)−0.22 (−1.16, 0.68)0.387
Median body fat (%)19.3 (14.1, 26.1)14.7 (11.6, 21.1)21.3 (16.7, 27.4)<0.0001
WHO % (n)11.5 (21)13.9 (10.0)9.9 (11)0.409
CDC, % (n)10.4 (18)11.1 (8)9.0 (10)0.641
IOTF, % (n)8.2 (15)8.3 (6)8.1 (9)0.957
D2O, % (n)17.5 (32)16.7 (12)18.0 (20)0.814
Data are presented as median (25th, 75th percentiles); mean ± SD; percentage (frequency); CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; D2O: Deuterium oxide; IOTF: International Obesity Taskforce; WHO: World Health Organization; BMI: Body mass index.
Table
Table 2. Diagnostic accuracy of BMI-based criteria for defining obesity in children using the percent body fat derived from deuterium method as reference method.
Table 2. Diagnostic accuracy of BMI-based criteria for defining obesity in children using the percent body fat derived from deuterium method as reference method.
Sensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)
Overall
WHO59.4 (40.6–76.3)98.7 (95.3–99.8)90.5 (69.6–98.8)91.9 (86.7–95.7)
CDC53.1 (34.7–70.9)99.3 (96.4–99.9)94.4 (72.7–99.9)90.9 (72.7–99.9)
IOTF46.9 (29.1–65.3)100.0 (97.6–100.0)100.0 (80.5–100.0)89.9 (84.3–94.0)
Boys
WHO75.0 (42.8–94.5)98.3 (91.1–99.9)90.0 (55.5–99.8)95.1 (86.5–99.0)
CDC66.7 (34.9–90.1)100.0 (94.0–100.0)100.0 (63.1–100.0)93.8 (84.8–98.3)
IOTF50.0 (21.1–78.9)100.0 (94.0–100.0)100.0 (54.1–100.0)90.9 (81.3–96.6)
Girls
WHO50.0 (27.2–72.8)98.9 (94.0–99.9)90.9 (58.7–99.8)90.0 (82.4–95.1)
CDC45.0 (23.1–68.5)98.9 (94.0–99.9)90.0 (55.5–99.8)89.1 (81.3–94.4)
IOTF45.0 (23.1–68.5)100.0 (96.0–100.0)100.0 (66.4–100.0)89.2 (81.5–94.4)
CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; IOTF: International Obesity Taskforce; WHO: World Health Organization.
Table
Table 3. Optimal cut-point estimation of WHO and CDC criteria for diagnosis of obesity.
Table 3. Optimal cut-point estimation of WHO and CDC criteria for diagnosis of obesity.
Cut-offSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)AUC (95% CI)
WHO BMI-for-age z-score
Overall0.6893.8 (79.2–99.2)92.7 (87.3–96.3)73.2 (57.1–85.8)98.6 (95.0–99.8)0.932 (0.885–0.980)
Boys0.8691.6 (61.5–99.8)96.7 (88.5–99.6)84.6 (54.5–98.1)98.3 (90.9–99.6)0.942 (0.857–1.000)
Girls0.6895.0 (75.1–99.9)90.1 (82.1–95.4)67.9 (47.6–84.1)98.8 (93.5–99.7)0.926 (0.868–0.983)
CDC BMI-for-age percentiles
Overall69.590.6 (75.0–98.0)90.1 (84.1–94.3)65.9 (50.1–79.5)97.8 (93.8–99.5)0.903 (0.847–0.960)
Boys87.583.3 (51.6–97.9)91.7 (81.6–97.2)66.7 (38.4–88.2)96.5 (87.9–99.6)0.875 (0.759–0.991)
Girls69.595.0 (75.1–99.9)89.0 (80.7–94.6)65.5 (45.7–82.1)98.8 (93.4–99.9)0.920 (0.813–0.979)
IOTF BMI-for-age z-score
Overall0.5050.0 (31.9–68.1)100.0 (97.6–100.0)100.0 (79.4–100.0)90.4 (84.9–94.4)0.750 (0.660–0.840)
Boys0.5058.3 (27.7–84.8)100.0 (94.0–100.0)100.0 (59.0–100.0)92.3 (82.5–97.5)0.792 (0.646–0.937)
Girls0.5045.0 (21.1–68.5)100.0 (96.0–100.0)100.0 (66.4–100.0)89.2 (81.5–94.5)0.725 (0.613–0.837)
CI: Confidence interval; WHO BMI-for-age z-score: World Health Organization Body mass index for age z-score; CDC BMI-for-age: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; IOTF: International Obesity Taskforce; BMI-for-age: Body mass index-for-age.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adom, T.; Kengne, A.P.; De Villiers, A.; Boatin, R.; Puoane, T. Diagnostic Accuracy of Body Mass Index in Defining Childhood Obesity: Analysis of Cross-Sectional Data from Ghanaian Children. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010036

AMA Style

Adom T, Kengne AP, De Villiers A, Boatin R, Puoane T. Diagnostic Accuracy of Body Mass Index in Defining Childhood Obesity: Analysis of Cross-Sectional Data from Ghanaian Children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adom, Theodosia, André Pascal Kengne, Anniza De Villiers, Rose Boatin, and Thandi Puoane. 2020. "Diagnostic Accuracy of Body Mass Index in Defining Childhood Obesity: Analysis of Cross-Sectional Data from Ghanaian Children" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop