Are Heart Rate and Rating of Perceived Exertion Effective to Control Indoor Cycling Intensity?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Participants
2.3. Experimental Sessions
2.4. Measurements
2.5. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Practical Application
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Norton, K.; Norton, L.; Sadgrove, D. Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2010, 13, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Golderg, J. Spinning® Instructor Manual. Phase 1: The Spinning® Journey 1.01; Schwinn Fitness International: Givisiez, Switzerland, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Muyor, J.M. Exercise Intensity and Validity of the Ratings of Perceived Exertion (Borg and OMNI Scales) in an Indoor Cycling Session. J. Hum. Kinet. 2013, 39, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Caria, M.A.; Tangianu, F.; Concu, A.; Crisafulli, A.; Mameli, O. Quantification of Spinning bike performance during a standard 50-minute class. J. Sports Sci. 2007, 25, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Battista, R.A.; Foster, C.; Andrew, J.; Wright, G.; Lucia, A.; Porcari, J.P. Physiologic responses during indoor cycling. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2008, 22, 1236–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dias, M.R.C.; Silva, A.C.E.; Júnior, J.M.N.; Batista, L.A.; de Lima, J.R.P.; da Silva Novaes, J. Effect of pedal cadence on mechanical power output and physiological variables. Braz. J. Kinanthropometry Hum. Perform. 2007, 9, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbosa, T.M.; Sousa, V.F.; Silva, A.J.; Reis, V.M.; Marinho, D.A.; Bragada, J.A. Effects of musical cadence in the acute physiologic adaptations to head-out aquatic exercises. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010, 24, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arngrímsson, S.A.; Stewart, D.J.; Borrani, F.; Skinner, K.A.; Cureton, K.J. Relation of heart rate to percent VO2 peak during submaximal exercise in the heat. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 94, 1162–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowell, L.B. Human cardiovascular adjustments to exercise and thermal stress. Physiol. Rev. 1974, 54, 75–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos-Jiménez, A.; Hernández-Torres, R.P.; Wall-Medrano, A.; Torres-Durán, P.V.; Juárez-Oropeza, M.A.; Solis Ceballos, J.A. Acute physiological response to indoor cycling with and without hydration; case and self-control study. Nutr. Hosp. 2013, 28, 1487–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, S.A.F.; Guida, H.L.; dos Antonio, A.M.; de Abreu, L.C.; Monteiro, C.B.M.; Ferreira, C.; Ribeiro, V.F.; Barnabe, V.; Silva, S.B.; Fonseca, F.L.A.; et al. Acute Auditory Stimulation with Different Styles of Music Influences Cardiac Autonomic Regulation in Men. Int. Cardiovasc. Res. J. 2014, 8, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
- Shaulov, N.; Lufi, D. Music and light during indoor cycling. Percept. Mot. Skills 2009, 108, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carneiro, A.L.; Oliveira, G.R.; Matos, D.G.; Aidar, F.; Manzini-Filho, M.L.; Hickner, R.C.; Reis, V.M. Physiological response to fluid intake with and without carbohydrate during indoor cycling classes. Gazz. Med. Ital. Arch. Sci. Med. 2014, 173, 291–298. [Google Scholar]
- Tschakert, G.; Kroepfl, J.; Mueller, A.; Moser, O.; Groeschl, W.; Hofmann, P. How to Regulate the Acute Physiological Response to “Aerobic” High-Intensity Interval Exercise. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2015, 14, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
- Eston, R.G.; Lamb, K.L.; Parfitt, G.; King, N. The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from a perceptually-regulated graded exercise test. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 94, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robertson, R.J.; Goss, F.L.; Bell, J.A.; Dixon, C.B.; Gallagher, K.I.; Lagally, K.M.; Timmer, J.M.; Abt, K.L.; Gallagher, J.D.; Thompkins, T. Self-regulated cycling using the Children’s OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2002, 34, 1168–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robertson, R.J.; Noble, B.J. Perception of physical exertion: Methods, mediators, and applications. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 1997, 25, 407–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shinya Yamauchi, S.M. Rating of Perceived Exertion for Quantification of the Intensity of Resistance Exercise. Int. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2013, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robertson, R.J.; Goss, F.L.; Dube, J.; Rutkowski, J.; Dupain, M.; Brennan, C.; Andreacci, J. Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for cycle ergometer exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2004, 36, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, F.Y.; Pereira, G.; Chimin, P.; Siqueira-Pereira, T.A.; Simões, H.G.; Bishop, D.J. Estimating the perceived exertion threshold using the OMNI scale. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010, 24, 1602–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soriano-Maldonado, A.; Romero, L.; Femia, P.; Roero, C.; Ruiz, J.R.; Gutierrez, A. A learning protocol improves the validity of the Borg 6-20 RPE scale during indoor cycling. Int. J. Sports Med. 2014, 35, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Miñarro, P.A.; Muyor Rodríguez, J.M. Heart rate and overall ratings of perceived exertion during Spinning® cycle indoor session in novice adults. Sci. Sports 2010, 25, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balke, B.; Ware, R.W. An experimental study of physical fitness of Air Force personnel. U.S. Armed Forces Med. J. 1959, 10, 675–688. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- American College of Sport Medicine ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 9th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-1-60913-605-5.
- Jackson, A.S.; Pollock, M.L. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br. J. Nutr. 1978, 40, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Siri, W.E. Body composition from fluid spaces and density: Analysis of methods. 1961. Nutr. Burbank Los Angel. Cty. Calif 1993, 9, 480–491; discussion 480–492. [Google Scholar]
- Fritz, C.O.; Morris, P.E.; Richler, J.J. Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chen, M.J.; Fan, X.; Moe, S.T. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: A meta-analysis. J. Sports Sci. 2002, 20, 873–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aniceto, R.R.; Ritti-Dias, R.M.; Dos Prazeres, T.M.P.; Farah, B.Q.; de Lima, F.F.M.; do Prado, W.L. Rating of Perceived Exertion During Circuit Weight Training: A Concurrent Validation Study. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015, 29, 3336–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherr, J.; Wolfarth, B.; Christle, J.W.; Pressler, A.; Wagenpfeil, S.; Halle, M. Associations between Borg’s rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 113, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Track | Time | BPM | RPM | RPE < (OMNI 0–10) | HR (% HRmax) | VO2 (Thresholds and % VO2 Peak) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5:00 | 80 | 80/60 | 2 | 40% | VTI |
2 | 3:00 | 80 | 80/60 | 4 | 50% | VTI |
3 | 5:00 | 120 | 60 | 6 | 70% | VTII |
4 | 6 | 120 | 60 | Interval 1 min at 6 with 1 min at 8 | Interval 1 min at 70% with 1 min at 90% | Interval 1 min at VTII with 1 min at 90% |
5 | 2:30 | 80 | 80/60 | 4 | 50% | VTI |
6 | 3:30 | 120 | 60 | 6 | 70% | VTII |
7 | 5.00 | 120 | 60 | Interval 30 s at 6 with 30 s at 8 | Interval 30 s at 70% with 30 s at 90% | Interval 30 s at VTII with 30 s at 90% |
8 | 4:30 | 80 | 80/60 | 4 | 50% | VTI |
9 | 3:30 | 120 | 60 | 6 | 70% | VTII |
10 | 5.00 | 120 | 60 | Interval 1 min at 6 with 1 min at 8 | Interval 30 s at 70% with 30 s at 90% | Interval 30 s at VTII with 30 s at 90% |
11 | 2:00 | 80 | 80/60 | 2 | 40% | VTI |
VO2 | HR | RPE | |
---|---|---|---|
VO2Abs (l/min) | 2.33 ± 0.27 | 1.98 ± 0.20 * | 2.10 ± 0.29 |
VO2rel (ml/kg/min) | 30.09 ± 3.18 | 25.49 ± 1.84 * | 27.12 ± 3.14 * |
HR (beat/min) | 137.77 ± 7.32 | 130.85 ± 6.56 | 134.71 ± 8.34 |
RER | 1.17 ± 0.32 | 1.24 ± 0.18 | 1.22 ± 0.26 |
VO2 | HR | RPE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute (l/min) | Relative (ml/kg/min) | Absolute (l/min) | Relative (ml/kg/min) | Absolute (l/min) | Relative (ml/kg/min) | |
T1 | 1.08 ± 0.16 * | 13.83 ± 1.28 * | 0.98 ± 0.21 * | 12.79 ± 2.54 * | 0.95 ± 0.17 * | 12.24 ± 1.65 * |
T2 | 1.62 ± 0.24 | 20.87 ± 2.61 | 1.39 ± 0.35 | 18.38 ± 4.60 | 1.24 ± 0.18 | 15.92 ± 1.98 |
T3 | 2.54 ± 0.38 | 32.71 ± 3.18 | 2.13 ± 0.35 | 28.56 ± 4.53 | 2.16 ± 0.29 | 27.81 ± 2.88 |
T4 | 2.97 ± 0.41 & | 38.37 ± 4.11 & | 2.73 ± 0.41 & | 35.39 ± 4.83 & | 2.68 ± 0.31 & | 34.48 ± 2.84 & |
T5 | 2.26 ± 0.30 | 27.95 ± 4.37 | 2.04 ± 0.42 | 25.37 ± 4.71 | 1.66 ± 0.36 | 22.86 ± 4.07 |
T6 | 2.54 ± 0.33 | 32.96 ± 3.99 | 2.16 ± 0.40 | 29.20 ± 4.41 | 2.04 ± 0.34 | 25.87 ± 3.49 |
T7 | 2.97 ± 0.38 & | 38.43 ± 4.42 & | 2.75 ± 0.36 & | 35.65 ± 3.61 & | 2.64 ± 0.20 & | 34.47 ± 3.39 & |
T8 | 1.85 ± 0.36 | 25.17 ± 4.77 | 1.72 ± 0.33 | 20.78 ± 3.25 | 1.48 ± 0.28 | 18.81 ± 2.62 |
T9 | 2.43 ± 0.36 | 31.51 ± 4.93 | 2.00 ± 0.37 | 26.99 ± 3.84 | 1.97 ± 0.28 | 26.23 ± 3.17 |
T10 | 2.85 ± 0.34 & | 36.94 ± 4.92 & | 2.60 ± 0.29 & | 33.82 ± 3.73 & | 2.51 ± 0.31 & | 32.30 ± 3.87 & |
T11 | 1.85 ± 0.40 | 22.37 ± 5.93 | 1.62 ± 0.37 | 20.89 ± 4.25 | 1.64 ± 0.36 | 19.78 ± 4.15 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Canário-Lemos, R.; Vilaça-Alves, J.; Moreira, T.; Peixoto, R.; Garrido, N.; Goss, F.; Furtado, H.; Machado Reis, V. Are Heart Rate and Rating of Perceived Exertion Effective to Control Indoor Cycling Intensity? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134824
Canário-Lemos R, Vilaça-Alves J, Moreira T, Peixoto R, Garrido N, Goss F, Furtado H, Machado Reis V. Are Heart Rate and Rating of Perceived Exertion Effective to Control Indoor Cycling Intensity? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(13):4824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134824
Chicago/Turabian StyleCanário-Lemos, Rui, José Vilaça-Alves, Tiago Moreira, Rafael Peixoto, Nuno Garrido, Fredric Goss, Hélio Furtado, and Victor Machado Reis. 2020. "Are Heart Rate and Rating of Perceived Exertion Effective to Control Indoor Cycling Intensity?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 13: 4824. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134824