Next Article in Journal
Injuries in Korean Elite Taekwondo Athletes: A Prospective Study
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Knowledge, Practice and Guidelines towards the Novel COVID-19 among Eye Care Practitioners in Nigeria–A Survey-Based Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 14
10.3390/ijerph17145142
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Properties on Tetraena mongolica in the Arid and Semi-Arid Regions, China

by
Mengying Ruan
1,
Yuxiu Zhang
1,* and
Tuanyao Chai
2
1
School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2
College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(14), 5142; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145142
Submission received: 26 June 2020 / Revised: 10 July 2020 / Accepted: 13 July 2020 / Published: 16 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Science and Engineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tetraena mongolica is a rare and endangered species unique to China. The total number and density of Tetraena mongolica shrubs in desertification areas have experienced a sharp decrease with increases in coal mining activities. However, available information on the T. mongolica rhizosphere soil quality and microbial properties is scarce. Here, we investigated the effect of coal mining on the soil bacterial community and its response to the soil environment in the T. mongolica region. The results showed that the closer to the coal mining area, the lower the vegetation coverage and species diversity. The electrical conductivity (EC) in the contaminated area increased, while the total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), and soil organic carbon (SOC) decreased. The activity of NAG, sucrose, β-glucosidase, and alkaline phosphatase further decreased. In addition, the mining area could alter the soil’s bacterial abundance and diversity. The organic pollutant degradation bacteria such as Sphingomonas, Gemmatimonas, Nocardioides, and Gaiella were enriched in the soil, and the carbon-nitrogen cycle was changed. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and Pearson’s correlation coefficients showed that the change in the bacterial community structure was mainly caused by environmental factors such as water content (SWC) and EC. Taken together, these results suggested that open pit mining led to the salinization of the soil, reduction the soil nutrient content and enzyme activity, shifting the rhizosphere soil microbial community structure, and altering the carbon-nitrogen cycle, and the soil quality declined and the growth of T. mongolica was affected in the end. Therefore, the development of green coal mining technology is of great significance to protect the growth of T. mongolica.

1. Introduction

T. mongolica is a rare and endangered species unique to the western Ordos Plateau in North-Central and Wuhai City, China [1]. China Red Data Book lists this rare species as the second highest priority for conservation. It is a common deciduous shrub inhabiting arid and semi-arid regions. T. mongolica is a xerophyte with a well-developed root system that is particularly suited to its habitat and able to cope with drought and other harsh natural conditions. It serves a role in stabilizing the sand in the region by promoting soil and water conservation and windbreaking. T. mongolica has been in decline in recent years. During the last 28 years, it has decreased 19.36% and covers less than 13.40 km2·a−1 [2]. This could be caused by the climate change but is attributed mainly to human activities, especially the coal mining [3].
The distribution of coal in Wuhai City is similar to the distribution of T. mongolica. Wuhai City mainly focuses on open pit mining. Coal mining gave rise to the destruction of the T. mongolica environment, where contaminants such as Cu, Pb, Mo, and As were highly enriched in the soil [4]. Furthermore, the combustion of coal particles and coal produces airborne compounds that may contain heavy metals and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), which settle or wash out of the atmosphere and contaminate the soil. The normal function of the soil in mining areas is changed due to the influence of these heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [5]. Coal mining activities affect the soil’s physical quality and interfere with the diversity of soil bacterial community. Coal mining activities affect the physical quality of the soil: high bulk density and low water holding capacity, porosity, moisture content, pH, and soil nutrients (total nitrogen and available phosphorus) [6]. Coal mining activities interfered with the soil bacterial community structure, which led to a significant reduction in soil enzyme activity, with the dominant bacteria comprising Proteobacteria, Actinomycetes, and Acidobacteria [7].
Plant growth depends on nutrient cycling in the soil releasing nutrients throughout [8]. Soil nutrient determines the growth of vegetation and plays an important role in the development of ecosystem, especially the vegetation community. The diversity of soil bacterial community structure is closely related to soil function [9]. Soil bacterial community structure is the foundation of soil function. Bacteria are responsible for nutrient conversion cycle, organic matter decomposition, humus formation, and system stabilization in soil ecological functions [10]. Soil bacteria participate in soil nutrient cycling and energy flow. Rhizosphere bacterial community composition depended on plant diversity. The root activity significantly affected the biological properties of soil [11]. Until recently, research on T. mongolica has focused on the biological characteristics, insect-related and pollination characteristics, landscape fragmentation process, and cell and genetic structure [12,13]. However, available information on the T. mongolica rhizosphere soil microbial properties is scarce, especially the coal mining. In this study, the soil nutrients and bacterial community structure of soil around T. mongolica were measured to evaluate the change of soil quality. The objectives of the study were (1) to understand the changes of plant community structure in the T. mongolica regions, (2) to evaluate the variation of soil quality in T. mongolica soil under open pit mining conditions, (3) to investigate the effect of soil bacterial diversity near T. mongolica and its response to open pit mining.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area is located in Wuhai City (39°02′30″–39°54′55″ N, 106°36′25″–107°08′05″ E), a new industrial city in the west of the Inner Mongolian autonomous region of Northwest China. There is a continental climate in the study area. The average temperature is 9.3 °C, the average annual rainfall is 162 mm, and the average sunshine exposure is 3138.6 h [14]. The vegetation coverage in the study area is 25%, and the main vegetation type is desert grassland, including such species as T. mongolica, Ammopiptanthus mongolicus, and Zygophyllum xanthoxylum.
In August 2018, based on the distribution of coal resources and T. mongolica, soil was collected from T. mongolica area disturbed by coal mining (P1, P2, P3), soil was less polluted from the Nature Reserve of T. mongolica (H1, H2), an adjacent unexploited area (CK). The distribution and characteristics of the samples are described in Figure 1. The soil closely bound to the roots collected within the space used by the roots is considered to be the rhizosphere [15]. In each plot, three quadrants (5 × 5 m per quadrant) were established as three soil cores. Using community ecology techniques, we investigated plant assemblages in the T. mongolica regions. In each quadrant, five samples were randomly collected and mixed to form a composite soil sample at soil depth (0–15 cm, 15–30 cm). Each soil sample was divided into two parts. Each part was naturally air-dried and filtered through a 2 mm mesh to test the soil properties. This portion was stored at 80 °C for subsequent high-throughput Illumina sequencing analysis.

2.2. Analysis of the Properties of Soil Samples

The dried soil was passed through a 1 mm sieve to determine the particle fractions. A conductivity meter was used to measure the soil electrical conductivity (EC) of the air-dried samples. Soil water content (SWC) was determined by drying soil samples at 105 °C for 24 h. The total nitrogen (TN) was determined by the Kjeldahl method [16]. The level of available phosphorus (AP) in the soil was determined by the molybdenum-blue method. The available potassium (AK) was extracted, and the level was determined using the methods described by Bao [17]. The soil organic carbon (SOC) content was determined using dichromate oxidation [18]. Mp-Nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide, disodium phenyl phosphate colorimetry, and indophenol-blue colorimetry were used to measure N-acetyl-β-d-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.52, NAG), alkaline phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.1), and sucrase (EC 3.2.1.26) activities, respectively [19]. The soil β-glucosidase (EC3.2.1.21) level was determined by culture and spectrophotometry. Three repeated experiments were carried out for the above indicators.

2.3. Soil Microbial Community Analysis

According to the manufacturer instructions, 500 mg of soil genomic DNA was extracted from each sample using the E.Z.N.A. soil DNA kit (Omega Biotek, GA 30071, USA). The extracted DNA was purified and quantified by a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo, MA 02451, USA). Each extracted 16S rRNA v3-v4 region was amplified by PCR using the following procedure: at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 95 °C, annealing for 30 s at 55 °C, and extension for 45 s at 72 °C, and then 10 min at 72 °C. The primers 341F (5’-barcode-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’) and 805R (5’-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’) were used [20]. The bar code for each primer corresponds to the unique eight-base sequence for each sample. The PCR mixture contained 5 μL of 10 x PCR buffer solution, 0.5 μL of 10 mm nucleotides, 10 ng of template DNA, 0.5 μL of each primer (50 mm), and 50 μL of ddH2O in total. The PCR products were determined by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The amplicon extracted from 2% agarose gel was purified using a PCR purification kit (Beckman, Indiana 46268, USA) and quantified using a Qubit® 2.0 fluorimeter (Invitrogen, CA 92008, USA) according to the standard protocol. Paired sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Shanghai Sangon Biotechnology Co., LTD., Shanghai, China) in accordance with the standard protocol (2300). The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) table was input into PICRUSt for metagenome prediction using the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) database.

2.4. Data Analysis

Simpson Index, Shannon–Wiener Index, and Pielou’s Evenness Index can measure the species diversity of the plant community. Community richness index (Chao1 and ACE estimator) and community diversity index (Shannon and Simpson index) were calculated in Mothur using the high-throughput sequencing data. The Shannon and Simpson indices were employed to estimate soil microbial diversity. The raw data were collated with Excel 2016 and visualized with Origin 2017. SPSS 23.0 was applied for statistical analysis. The figures were produced with Origin 2017. Redundancy analysis (RDA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) were used to determine the correlations between soil indicators among the samples using Canoco 5.0.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Open Pit Mining on Plant Community Structure

Field investigations were conducted on the vegetation community structure in the area where Tetraena mongolica was distributed in Table 1. The vegetation coverage and species diversity indicators in polluted areas close to the mining area is low. The vegetation coverage and species diversity of Tetraena mongolica: Nature reserve is lower than that of the control area. Species number, coverage and species diversity index of plants at sampling points: the control area > Nature reserve > the contaminated area. The vegetation in the contaminated area is mainly Reaumuria soongarica, Tetraena mongolica, and Achnatherum splendens. The vegetation in the Nature reserve is mainly composed of Tetraena mongolica and Zygophyllum xanthoxylon. Tetraena mongolica and Phragmites australis are the main vegetation in the control area. Different locations have different vegetation types.

3.2. Effect of Open Pit Mining on Soil Quality

The soil particle size distribution is indicated in Figure 2. The contaminated area and conservation area mainly consisted of fine sand and moderate sand, where 15–30 cm is considered coarse sand. The control area mainly contained sand and silt, while sand was the major component of both the contaminated and conservation areas. The conservation area had coarse sand. There was more moderate sand and silt present in the contaminated area than in the control area. There was also less clay in the topsoil, but the amount of clay at 15–30 cm increased.
As shown in Figure 3, the soil SWC and EC of the samples showed different trends. The soil EC ranged from 1.80–2.62 dS·m−1. These soil variables gradually increased with depth, and the values in the contaminated area were statistically higher than those in the control area at the same depth. The SWC ranged from 5.95 to 15.60% in the control and contaminated areas. The SWC of the T. mongolica regions increased with the increase in depth. The surface water content of the contaminated area was at a low level. There were same trends in the severe group and the controls with regard to soil nutrients. For these groups, the TN, AP, AK, and SOC exhibited similar changes with depth, but the values were statistically higher in the control area than in the contaminated areas. The soil TN of all studied areas ranged from 0.11 g·kg−1 to 0.65 g·kg−1. The soil AP of all studied areas ranged from 3.48 mg·kg−1 to 8.91 mg·kg−1. The AP content decreased with the increase in depth, and the surface soil value in the control area was significantly higher than that in the contaminated area. The soil AK ranged from 95.39 mg·kg−1 to 160.29 mg·kg−1. The AK content in the topsoil was higher in the control area compared to the contaminated area. The SOC of the control areas decreased from 0–15 cm to 15–30 cm by 16.81%, while these percent decreases were 19.32% from 0–15 cm to 15–30 cm in the contaminated areas. The control areas had a lower decrease in rates over the soil depth range than the contaminated areas.
The activities of four enzymes (NAG, sucrose, β-glucosidase, and alkaline phosphatase) in the T. mongolica regions are displayed in Figure 4. Soil enzyme activity decreased with increasing depth in both the control and contaminated areas. The surface enzymes activity in the control area was significantly higher than that in other areas. Soil NAG activity in the T. mongolica regions ranged from 2.88 to 11.75 μg·g−1·h−1. Soil sucrose activity in the T. mongolica regions ranged from 1.50 to 6.31 mg·g−1·24 h−1. The activity of β-glucosidase ranged from 14.69 to 41.17 mg·g−1·24 h−1. The highest activity of alkaline phosphatase was 1.92 mg·g−1·24 h−1 in the control area at 0–15 cm depth. The activity levels in contaminated areas were significantly lower than those in the control areas. The overall activity of the four enzymes in the control area soil was significantly higher than that in the contaminated area soil. Therefore, all the results show that open pit mining reduces soil enzyme activity.

3.3. Effect of Open Pit Mining on Bacterial Community Structure and Composition

The coverage index actually reflects whether the sequencing results represent the real situation of the sample. The coverage of all samples was above 95%, indicating that the results of sequencing were reliable and reflected the real situation of soil bacteria. As shown in Table 2, the ACE, Shannon and Chao1 indices for six sites revealed similar trends and exhibited a gradual decrease with depth; higher values were recorded for the control area at the same depth. The Simpson diversity index was the highest among two samples collected at 15–30 cm depth, and the value of the control area was lower than that of the contaminated area. These results show that the soil structure induced by open pit mining gradually decreases the bacterial richness and diversity.
Bacterial 16S rRNA genes collected from 12 soil samples were sequenced by high-throughput sequencing and cluster analysis, and a total of 11 phyla were obtained (Figure 5). At the phylum level, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi were the 7 most abundant phyla. In addition, approximately 7% of the sequences were not assigned to any of the existing phyla, suggesting that there are unrecognized microbial resources in the region. As shown in Figure 5, the community structure of each site was the same at the phylum level, but the relative abundance of each genus was different. Actinobacteria were abundant in the contaminated areas at 15–30 cm depths, but in other areas the opposite was true. Proteobacteria were the most abundant at a soil depth of 0–15 cm. Acidobacteria were more abundant at soil depth of 0–15 cm than at soil depth of 15–30 cm. Increased levels of Planctomycetes were detected in the surface soil of the contaminated areas. Gemmatimonadetes were the most abundant at a soil depth of 0–15 cm in the contaminated area. Chloroflexi were more abundant than the deep layer when the soil depth is 0–15 cm. In the desert, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Candidatus Saccharibacteria were the 4 most abundant phyla. Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were more abundant at soil depth of 15–30 cm than at soil depth of 0–15 cm; they were the opposite of the levels observed for Candidatus Saccharibacteria and Bacteroidetes. At the phylum level, the contaminated area of the soil bacterial community structure was similar to the control area, and the relative abundance of bacteria belonging to each phylum exhibited obvious differences, verifying that coal mining has an apparent influence on the soil bacteria community structure.
At the genus level, the thermal maps of microbial communities in different sampling areas were constructed (Figure 6). At the genus level, 628 bacterial genera were detected. The 20 most abundant genera, with a frequency >1.5% in at least one sample, were selected for heat map analysis. Based on Figure 6, the main genus types in soil samples were as follows: Sphingomonas, Gp6, Gemmatimonas, WPS-1_genera_incertae_sedis, Nocardioides, and Saccharibacteria_genera_incertae_sedis. The main genus types in the conservation area and contaminated area were Sphingomonas, Gp6, and Gemmatimonas. Nocardioides, and Saccharibacteria_genera_incertae_sedisere were the main genus types in the desert area. In both the control and contaminated areas, Sphingomonas was the primary genus, representing 2.52–8.67% the sequences. Gemmatimonas was the next major component of the bacterial community in all samples. Gaiella represented 0.45–12.37% of the sequences, among which the contaminated area harbored a significantly high percentage. Nocardioides represented 0.45–2.12% of the sequences obtained from the control and contaminated areas. Acidobacteria, particularly subgroups Gp6, Gp4, Gp16, and Gp7, represent approximately 10% of all bacteria found in the soil. Saccharibacteria_genera_incertae_sedis represented between 0.52% and 1.99% of the sequences discovered in the control and contaminated areas, respectively, among which the desert area harbored a significantly high percentage (10%). Other core genera included Pirellula, Thiobacillus, Sphingomonas, and Rubrobacter.
Based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, the abundance of functional genes is predicted. Functional genes with statistical differences at p < 0.05 between contaminated area and control area were shown in Figure 7. At the second level, most KEGG pathways significantly different were increased by open pit mining. The larger differences between contaminated area and control area samples were found for the terms “Carbohydrate Metabolism”, “Membrane Transport”, and “Amino Acid Metabolism”. The results indicate that coal mining causes changes in soil bacterial metabolism. At the third level, the larger differences between contaminated area and control area samples were found for the terms “Peptidases “, “Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptopha” and “Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis”. Functional genes related to peptidases had enriched.

3.4. Response of Bacterial Community to Soil Environmental Factors

Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between soil chemical properties and soil bacterial community (Table 3). Among the main environmental factors, there is a significant relationship between every factors and soil bacterial community. The changes of eight dominant bacteria are related to soil properties. The correlation between different bacterial groups and each soil environmental factor is different. Sphingomonas showed a significant positive correlation with AP (p < 0.05); Gp6 showed a significant positive correlation with SWC, and Gemmatimonas exhibited a significant positive correlation with EC and SWC (p < 0.05). Nocardioides showed a significant negative correlation with EC and SWC (p < 0.05), and there was a significant negative correlation with SOC and TN (p < 0.01). Saccharibacteria_genera_incertae_sedis showed a significant negative correlation with SWC and Sand (p < 0.05), and there was a significant negative correlation with EC, SOC, and TN (p < 0.01).
To further explore the relationships between environmental factors and bacterial community structures, a canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) tri-plot was constructed, as shown in Figure 8. CCA1 and CCA2 explained 40.01% and 35.82% of the variance, respectively. The environmental factors and soil nutrients were found to be closely related to the structure and composition of the soil microbial communities. The SWC and EC have the longest arrow lines, indicating that they are both major factors driving changes in soil nutrients and enzyme activity. Thus, the SWC and EC were the strongest determinants, respectively, with respect to the microbial community composition. AK, AP, TN, and SOC were positivity correlated with the soil bacterial community composition. Soil enzymatic activities were positivity correlated with the soil bacterial community composition.

4. Discussion

4.1. Open Pit Mining Reduced Soil Nutrient and Enzyme Activity

Open pit mining damages soil structure, decreases soil water holding capacity, and seriously affects plant growth. The closer to the coal mining area, the lower the vegetation coverage and species diversity. Although the T. mongolica Nature Reserve is far away from the mining area, it is also polluted, and the vegetation coverage and species diversity are reduced. In this study, we found that the particle size distribution in the contaminated area was mainly sandy soil, whereas open pit mining increases the content of sand and decreases the content of silt. The EC of soil in the contaminated area was significantly higher than that in the control area at the same depth. At the same time, the soil moisture content was low, while the soil EC value was relatively high, which reflects the desertification characteristics of poor-quality alkaline soil in this region. The SOC in the distribution area of T. mongolica was low, and the TN, AP, and AK were also very low. This indicates that soil fertility was very low, and the amount of nitrogen phosphorus content that could be directly absorbed by plants was very low in the contaminated areas.
T. mongolica regions are located in the arid and semi-arid area of Northwest China. Water is the main ecological limiting factor in the study area. The decrease in field moisture capacity may be related to the loss of physical clay in soil [21]. Severe soil erosion and wind erosion in this area are some of the most important factors causing soil desertification, with open pit mining exacerbating the problem. In arid and semi-arid areas, the rainfall rate is much slower than the evaporation rate, and the salt content accumulates in the soil and groundwater. The soil is generally alkaline, while coal mining aggravates the evaporation of water, thus causing soil salinity risk. The available nutrients in the soil are decreased in polluted areas, which may be caused by soil structure destruction due to open pit mining. Processes such as coal mining, coal transportation, coal gangue heap, discharge at will, and wind dust will intensify the accumulation of heavy metals in the surrounding soil, and this will have an impact on soil nutrients [22]. Soil enzyme activity is a sensitive and reliable index of soil biological activity and soil fertility [23,24]. For instance, NAG and phosphatase participate in soil the C, N and P cycles, which may affect soil fertility [25]. β-glucosidase can change cellulose, starch, and sugar into low molecular weight compounds [26]. Urease plays a vital role in the hydrolysis of urea into carbon dioxide and ammonia [27]. Phosphatase catalyzes organophosphate mineralization and immobilization processes, affecting the potential supply of organophosphorus. There are many factors affecting the enzyme activity, and its mechanism is complex. Soil water is one of the main factors affecting soil enzyme activity, which can regulate soil microbial activity by affecting soil osmotic potential, nutrients, energy transfer, and microbial cell metabolism, thereby affecting soil enzyme activity [28]. The soil nutrient content and enzyme activity were significantly different in among separate farmlands, and the soil urease, phosphatase and catalase activity were significantly linearly correlated with the soil organic matter and nutrient content [29]. The catalase, polyphenol oxidase, and sucrase activities in the soil were significantly correlated with the available nitrogen in the soil and that urease and polyphenol oxidase were significantly correlated with the total nitrogen content, with the sucrase activity significantly correlated with the level of organic matter present [30].
As pollution increases, the soil enzyme synthesis function declines, microbial growth is restrained, soil organic matter decomposes at a slower pace, respiration is restrained, N fixation effects are reduced, and the turnover rate of C and N elements and the energy cycle are reduced; this results in lower soil organic matter and TN content. As a consequence, the soil water capacity, EC, soil nutrients, and other factors can change the soil enzyme activity, while coal mining increases the soil heterogeneity and causes changes to the soil enzyme activity. Changes in soil nutrients and uenzyme activity indicate that open pit mining leads to soil degradation, affecting the TOC, N, and P cycles of the soil, and thus affecting the total number and density of T. mongolica.

4.2. The Soil Bacterial Community Shift due to Open Pit Mining

Soil microorganisms are an important part of the rhizosphere soil ecosystem, and their quantity and distribution are influenced by many factors, which can reflect the subtle changes within the soil ecosystem. The secretion from the roots of plants have a serious effect on microorganisms of the rhizosphere. Soil microbial communities play an important role in ecosystems by regulating soil processes.
In the soil environments, bacteria species or strains are very abundant. The diversities are related to the vegetation, soil moisture, and depth. Open pit mining had severe effects on soil properties such as the SWC, soil EC, nutrient levels, and enzyme activities. Thus, the soil structure induced by open pit mining gradually decreases the bacterial richness and diversity. In the present study, the 7 dominant bacterial communities present in the soils belonged to the phyla Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, Gemmatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi in the same pattern observed from the above index. Among the bacteria from various topsoil sources, 92% belong to the 9 dominant phyla: Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Gemmatimonadetes, and Firmicutes [31]. Li studied the effects of vegetation restoration among different soil bacterial communities, and the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria [7]. Li [32] also investigated the diversity and composition of bacterial communities in response to reclamation of a soil subsidence area affected by mining activities, and found that the predominant phyla in present in the soils were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Planctomycetes. This indicates that the soil bacterial community in the Tetraena mongolica region is consistent with other types of soil at the phyla level.
In addition, the abundance of some core genera in the soil also changed substantially, such as the increase in Sphingomonas, Gemmatimonas and Gaiella and the decrease in Nocardioides. Sphingomonas sp. was a member of the hydrocarbon degrading family Sphingomonadaceae and relies on vitamins for its growth [33]. Vitamins are an essential micronutrient to promote biodegradation activity and accelerate the degradation of tributyl phosphate. Therefore, Sphingomonas was abundant in the contaminated area. Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 promotes the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana [34]. Gemmatimonas plays a key role in the fixation of organic carbon [35]. Gemmatimonas also participates in SOC dynamics because Gemmatimonas can metabolize fibers, thus promoting the degradation of cellulose [36]. Consequently, the Gemmatimonas content is higher in the topsoil. Gaiella and Solirubrobacter have also been reported to degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [37]. Nocardioides species degrade aromatic amines by utilizing a mixture of aromatic amines as a source of carbon, nitrogen, energy, and sulfur [38]. Nocardioides sp. strain PD653 are capable of denitrating chloroaromatic compounds [39]. Acidobacterial subgroups Gp4 and Gp6 are more abundant in soils with relatively high SOC [40]. It is reported that Saccharibacteria_genera_incertae_sedis mostly exists in desert areas [41]. Prediction of functional gene in rhizosphere soil showed that the largest differences between contaminated area and control area samples were the terms “Carbohydrate Metabolism” and “Peptidases”. The activity of all cysteine peptidases depends on a catalytic dyad of cysteine and histidine [42]. Rhizosphere soil increased the carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism, which were related to higher rates of soil C turnover [43]. Soil microbial richness and activity are closely related to the availability of soil nutrients. “Amino Acid Metabolism” were the energy and carbon sources of bacterial metabolism [44]. Thus, rhizosphere soil could promote more amino acid production and humic substance synthesis. During the metabolism, the microbes were accumulated in soil and probably concerned in further carbon and nitrogen cycling.
Open pit mining has no significant effect on the composition of the soil’s microbial community, but open pit mining reduces the diversity of soil bacteria, and the soil environment in the polluted area was poor, which changed the relative abundance of dominant bacteria. Thus, the dominant bacteria had strong anti-interference ability and open pit mining increased the abundance of bacteria for metabolism and degradation of organic pollutants. The dominant bacteria played an important role in nutrient cycling in poor soil. Microbial degradation is not only the main pattern of degrading mining area pollution but also one of powerful means to treat pollution in the environment.

4.3. Response of the Soil Bacterial Community to Changes in Soil Properties

Soil properties can affect the composition of bacterial communities, and those soil microbial communities play an important role in the ecosystem by regulating soil processes [9,45]. In this study, the correlation coefficient of CCA and Pearson’s correlation coefficients showed the relationship between the relative abundance of dominant flora and soil properties, indicating the response of the change of soil bacterial community to the change of soil biochemical characteristics. There was a significant correlation between the bacteria and the soil EC, SWC, TN, AP, and SOC, indicating that the soil bacterial community in Wuhai was also affected by the soil properties. Zeng [46] reported a significant correlation between soil bacterial communities and the levels of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen [24], and total phosphorus. Gao [47] observed that soil TP was positively correlated with Actinobacteria and negatively correlated with Firmicutes. Taylor [48] believed that soil enzyme activity was significantly correlated with soil microbial quantity and microbial diversity. Torres-Cortes found that the diversity of rhizosphere bacteria in central and southern Mexico changed with different seasons, and Acosta-Martínez identified positive correlations between Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, Verrucomicrobia, and Fibrobacteres and the activity of alkaline phosphatase and β-glucosidase or β-glucosaminidase [49]. Li studied the effects of vegetation restoration on the soil bacterial community, enzyme activity, and nutrients in the Loess Plateau and found that soil organic matter, available phosphorus, urease, and sucrase significantly increased, with the dominant phyla being Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Acidobacteria [7]. Our result, among the main environmental factors, is that there is a significant relationship between every factor and soil bacterial community. Changes in dominant bacteria are related to soil properties, consistent with previous studies.
Thus, the changes of soil environmental factors and nutrients are the main factors controlling the changes of soil bacterial community structure. It may be because the area is located in the arid and semi-arid area, with less rainfall and large water evaporation. Microorganisms are involved in the decomposition of plant litter, and changes in the quality and quantity of litter lead to differences in soil TOC. However, open pit mining destroys the soil structure, which leads to the decrease of soil water holding capacity, the increase of electrical conductivity, and the accumulation of soil salt. The loss of water will be accompanied by the loss of nutrients. The accumulation of salt in the soil will hinder the nutrient cycle in the soil. Soil microbial communities play an important role in ecosystems by regulating soil processes. Therefore, the soil water and electrical conductivity are environmental factors that disturb the soil plants and microorganisms. This discovery indicates that open pit mining changes the physical and chemical properties of soil, decreases carbon and nitrogen cycling, and changes soil nutrients, which changes the structure of soil microbial communities in the Tetraena mongolica region.

5. Conclusions

Open pit mining leads to surface damage and deterioration of the ecological environment. Our study showed that open pit mining had severe effects on Tetraena mongolica soil properties such as the SWC, soil EC, nutrient levels, and enzyme activities. The results showed that the electrical conductivity (EC) increased; the TN, AP, AK, and SOC decreased, and the activity of four kinds of enzymes (NAG, sucrose, β-glucosidase, and alkaline phosphatase) in the soil decreased. In the present study, seven dominant phyla were found, in which the relative abundance of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Gemmatimonadetes increased while the abundance of Acidobacteria, Planctomycetes, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi decreased. In addition, the abundance of some core genera in the soil also changed substantially, such as the increase in Sphingomonas, Gemmatimonas, and Gaiella and the decrease in Nocardioides. These results indicate that open pit mining caused the soil microbial community structure to shift, bacterial diversity and relative abundance to decrease, the carbon-nitrogen cycle to alter, the enzyme activity to decrease, the salinization of the soil to reach serious conditions, and the soil nutrient content to be reduced. This paper discusses the effects of open pit mining on Tetraena mongolica soil that were revealed; further studies are needed to investigate the harm brought by soil changes on Tetraena mongolica, and to reveal the potential interaction between plant community and soil microbial community.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and Y.Z.; methodology, M.R.; software, M.R.; validation, M.R., Y.Z. and T.C.; formal analysis, M.R.; investigation, M.R.; resources, Y.Z. and T.C.; data curation, M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. and M.R.; visualization, M.R.; supervision, Y.Z. and T.C.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0504400) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2020YJSHH06).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ma, X.; Chang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhai, W.; Yu, X.; Feng, Y. The complete chloroplast genome of Tetraena mongolica (Zygophyllaceae), an endangered shrub endemic to China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 1030–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhen, J.H.; Yu, S.; Zhao, M.; Liu, G.H. Habitat suitability assessment of endangered plant Tetraena mongolica Maxim. Sci. Cold Arid Reg. 2011, 3, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shan, Q. The impact of anthropogenic disturbance on landscape of Tetraena mongolica shrub in the Wuhai City. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2014, 34, 6346–6354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, W.F.; Hao, W.D.; Bian, Z.F.; Lei, S.G.; Wang, X.S.; Sang, S.X.; Xu, S.C. Effect of coal mining activities on the environment of Tetraena mongolica in Wuhai, Inner Mongolia, China—A geochemical perspective. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 132, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rai, A.K.; Paul, B.; Singh, G. Assessment of Top Soil Quality in The Vicinity of Subsided Area in the South Eastern Part of Jharia Coalfield, Jharkhand, India. Rep. Opin. 2009, 12, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pandey, B.; Mukherjee, A.; Agrawal, M.; Singh, S. Assessment of Seasonal and Site-Specific Variations in Soil Physical, Chemical and Biological Properties around Opencast Coal Mines. Pedosphere 2019, 29, 642–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, P.F.; Zhang, X.C.; Hao, M.D.; Cui, Y.X.; Zhu, S.L.; Zhang, Y.J. Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Bacterial Communities, Enzyme Activities, and Nutrients of Reconstructed Soil in a Mining Area on the Loess Plateau, China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lehman, R.M.; Acosta-Martinez, V.; Buyer, J.S.; Cambardella, C.A.; Collins, H.P. Soil biology for resilient, healthy soil. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2015, 70, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bhandari, K.B.; Longing, S.D.; West, C.P. iSoil Microbial Communities in Corn Fields Treated with Atoxigenic Aspergillus flavus. Soil Syst. 2020, 4, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dai, H.C.; Chen, Y.Q.; Yang, X.L.; Cui, J.X.; Sui, P. The effect of different organic materials amendment on soil bacteria communities in barren sandy loam soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 24019–24028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, C.R.; Condron, L.M.; Davis, M.R.; Sherlocka, R.R. Phosphorus dynamics in the rhizosphere of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don.). Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 487–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beier, B.A.; Chase, M.W.; Thulin, M. Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy of subfamily Zygophylloideae (Zygophyllaceae) based on molecular and morphological data. Plant Syst. Evol. 2003, 240, 11–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ge, X.J.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, N.X.; Chen, H.S.; Qi, W.Q. Genetic variation in the endangered Inner Mongolia endemic shrub Tetraena mongolica Maxim. (Zygophyllaceae). Biol. Conserv. 2003, 111, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, G. The Western Ordos Plateau as a Biodiversity Center of Relic Shrubs in Arid Areas of China. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14, 3187–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Garcia, C.; Roldan, A.; Hernandez, T. Ability of Different Plant Species to Promote Microbiological Processes in Semiarid Soil. Geoderma 2005, 124, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Niu, S.; Yang, H.; Yu, G. Contrasting responses of phosphatase kinetic parameters to nitrogen and phosphorus additions in forest soils. Funct. Ecol. 2018, 32, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bao, S. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. In Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2000; pp. 70–111. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bowman, R.A.; Cole, C.V. An Exploratory Method for Fractionation of Organic Phosphorus From Grassland Soils. Soil Sci. 1978, 125, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tabatabai, M.A.; Bremner, J.M. Use of pnitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1969, 1, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, D.H.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Du, P.C.; Li, X.; Wang, H.Y.; Han, N.; Chen, C.; Gao, Z.C. Rapid Identification of Bacterial Species Associated with Bronchiectasis via Metagenomic Approach. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2014, 27, 898–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duyusen, E.G.; Gorkem, A. Effect of sediment size on bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated sediments of Izmir Inner Bay. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, 1784–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ashraf, M.A.; Maah M., J.; Yusoff, I. Chemical Speciation and Potential Mobility of Heavy Metals in the Soil of Former Tin Mining Catchment. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 125608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Acosta-Martinez, V.; Amanda, C.; Jane, J. Simultaneous determination of multiple soil enzyme activities for soil health-biogeochemical indices. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 126, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bhandari, K.B.; West, C.P.; Acosta-Martinez, V.; Cotton, J.; Cano, A. Soil health indicators as affected by diverse forage species and mixtures in semi-arid pastures. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2018, 132, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kang, Y.H.; Liu, S.H.; Wan, S.Q.; Wang, R.S. Assessment of soil enzyme activities of saline–sodic soil under drip irrigation in the Songnen plain. Paddy Water Environ. 2013, 11, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, F.; Yang, X.F.; Li, Z.; Du, C.Y.; Wang, J.F.; Li, S. Overexpression and characterization of a glucose-tolerant β-glucosidase from T. aotearoense with high specific activity for cellobiose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 8903–8915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. García-Ruiz, R.; Ochoa, V.; Belén Hinojosa, M.; Carreira, J.A. Suitability of enzyme activities for the monitoring of soil quality improvement in organic agricultural systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 2137–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wan, Z.M.; Wu, J.G. Study progress on factors affecting soil enzyme activity. J. Northwest Sci-Tech Univ. Agric. For. 2005, 33, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shu, Y.Y.; Huang, J.S.; Zhao, G.J.; Bao, W.K.; Li, G.Q.; Pang, X.Y. Effects of afforestation with different tree species on soil enzyme activities and nutrient content in eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, H.S.; Ren, Y.F.; Zhao, T.Q.; He, Y.X. Research on the Woodland Soil Enzyme Activities in Coal Mining Subsidence Area. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics & Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai, China, 16–18 May 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Janssen, P.H. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1719–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Li, Y.Y.; Chen, L.Q.; Wen, H.Y. Changes in the composition and diversity of bacterial communities 13 years after soil reclamation of abandoned mine land in eastern China. Ecol. Res. 2014, 30, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, J.; Lin, H.; Dong, Y.B.; Li, B. Elucidating the biodegradation mechanism of tributyl phosphate (TBP) by Sphingomonas sp. isolated from TBP-contaminated mine tailings. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 250, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Luo, Y.; Wang, F.; Huang, Y.L.; Zhou, M.; Gao, J.L.; Yan, T.Z.; Sheng, H.M.; An, L.Z. Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 Increases Plant Growth Rate and Alters Rhizosphere Microbial Community Structure of Arabidopsis thaliana Under Drought Stress. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Guo, L.J.; Zheng, S.X.; Cao, C.G.; Li, C.F. Tillage practices and straw-returning methods affect topsoil bacterial community and organic C under a rice-wheat cropping system in central China. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Y.H.; Yu, Z.H.; Li, Y.S.; Wang, G.H.; Liu, J.J.; Liu, J.D.; Liu, X.B.; Jin, J. Microbial association with the dynamics of particulate organic carbon in response to the amendment of elevated CO2-derived wheat residue into a Mollisol. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 607, 972–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, L.; Zhang, J.; Peng, C. Shift of Soil Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Dissipation Pattern and Microbial Community Composition due to Rhamnolipid Supplementation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019, 230, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Juárez-Ramírez, C.; Galíndez-Mayer, J.; Ruiz-Ordaz, N.; Ramos-Monroy, O.; Santoyo-Tepole, F.; Poggi-Varaldo, H. Steady-state inhibition model for the biodegradation of sulfonated amines in a packed bed reactor. New Biotechnol. 2015, 32, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ito, K.; Takagi, K.; Kataoka, R.; Kiyota, H.; Iwasaki, A. Dissipation, dehalogenation, and denitration of chloroaromatic compounds by Nocardioides sp. strain PD653: Characterization of the substrate specificity. J. Pestic. Sci. 2019, 44, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sul, W.J.; Asuming-Brempong, S.; Wang, Q.; Tourlousse, D.M.; Penton, C.R. Tropical agricultural land management influences on soil microbial communities through its effect on soil organic carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 65, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Schumann, P.; De-Chao, Z.; Franca, L. Marmoricola silvestris sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from alpine forest soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 1313–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rawlings, N.D.; Barrett, A.J. Families of cysteine peptidases. Methods Enzym. 1994, 244, 461–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hartman, W.H.; Ye, R.Z.; Horwath, W.R.; Tringe, S.G. A genomic perspective on stoichiometric regulation of soil carbon cycling. ISME J. 2017, 11, 2652–2665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hou, D.D.; Wang, K.; Liu, T.; Wang, H.X.; Lin, Z.; Qian, J.; Lu, L.L.; Tian, S.K. Unique Rhizosphere Micro-characteristics Facilitate Phytoextraction of Multiple Metals in Soil by the Hyperaccumulating Plant Sedum alfredii. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 5675–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bhandari, K.B.; West, C.P.; Acosta-Martinez, V. Assessing the role of interseeding alfalfa into grass on improving pasture soil health in semi-arid Texas High Plains. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 147, 103399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zeng, Q.C.; Dong, Y.H.; An, S.S. Bacterial Community Responses to Soils along a Latitudinal and Vegetation Gradient on the Loess Plateau, China. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gao, Y.C.; Wang, J.N.; Guo, S.H.; Hu, Y.L.; Li, T.T. Effects of salinization and crude oil contamination on soil bacterial community structure in the Yellow River Delta region, China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015, 86, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taylor, J.P.; Wilson, B.; Mills, M.S.; Burns, R.G. Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Acosta-Martínez, V.; Dowd, S.E.; Sun, Y.; Wester, D.; Allen, V. Pyrosequencing analysis for characterization of soil bacterial populations as affected by an integrated livestock-cotton production system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010, 45, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 17 05142 g001 550
Figure 1. Tetraena mongolica distribution area and sample location.
Figure 1. Tetraena mongolica distribution area and sample location.
Ijerph 17 05142 g001
Ijerph 17 05142 g002 550
Figure 2. Soil particle size distribution of samples. Soil particles classifications: clay (0–5 μm); silt (5–50 μm); fine sand (50–250 μm), moderate sand (250–500 μm) and coarse sand (500–1000 μm).
Figure 2. Soil particle size distribution of samples. Soil particles classifications: clay (0–5 μm); silt (5–50 μm); fine sand (50–250 μm), moderate sand (250–500 μm) and coarse sand (500–1000 μm).
Ijerph 17 05142 g002
Ijerph 17 05142 g003 550
Figure 3. Physicochemical properties of the soil samples. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 0.05 (p < 0.05) levels.
Figure 3. Physicochemical properties of the soil samples. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 0.05 (p < 0.05) levels.
Ijerph 17 05142 g003
Ijerph 17 05142 g004 550
Figure 4. Changes in soil enzyme activities in the control and contaminated areas. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 0.05 (p < 0.05) levels.
Figure 4. Changes in soil enzyme activities in the control and contaminated areas. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 0.05 (p < 0.05) levels.
Ijerph 17 05142 g004
Ijerph 17 05142 g005 550
Figure 5. At the phylum level, soil bacterial community composition in the T. mongolica regions.
Figure 5. At the phylum level, soil bacterial community composition in the T. mongolica regions.
Ijerph 17 05142 g005
Ijerph 17 05142 g006 550
Figure 6. Heat map of microbial community structure in soil.
Figure 6. Heat map of microbial community structure in soil.
Ijerph 17 05142 g006
Ijerph 17 05142 g007 550
Figure 7. Prediction of abundance of functional gene contents of rhizosphere soil. The microbial functions were predicted at the second (top) and the third (bottom) level of the KEGG pathway.
Figure 7. Prediction of abundance of functional gene contents of rhizosphere soil. The microbial functions were predicted at the second (top) and the third (bottom) level of the KEGG pathway.
Ijerph 17 05142 g007
Ijerph 17 05142 g008 550
Figure 8. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of environment variables, enzymatic activity, and bacterial diversity.
Figure 8. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of environment variables, enzymatic activity, and bacterial diversity.
Ijerph 17 05142 g008
Table
Table 1. Changes in plant community structure at sampling sites.
Table 1. Changes in plant community structure at sampling sites.
Sample CodeVegetation Coverage (%)Shannon- IndexPielou’s IndexSimpson IndexMain
Companion Species
P123.331.050.710.87Achnatherum splendens
P228.491.230.720.89Reaumuria soongarica
P321.291.180.690.90Achnatherum splendens
H146.791.350.670.86Zygophyllum xanthoxylon
H251.311.470.640.82Zygophyllum xanthoxylon
CK72.341.530.680.72Phragmites australis
Table
Table 2. Characteristics of soil bacterial richness and diversity indices in different soil samples.
Table 2. Characteristics of soil bacterial richness and diversity indices in different soil samples.
Sample CodeShannonACEChao1CoverageSimpson
P1-16.698139.967828.360.950.06
P1-35.937124.627228.360.950.09
P2-16.878496.797847.480.950.07
P2-35.847051.327025.390.950.10
P3-16.828308.257956.830.960.07
P3-35.757150.237081.620.970.09
H1-17.2710,527.349096.680.960.05
H1-36.369488.998049.600.950.08
H2-17.1511,035.318847.980.960.05
H2-36.569468.667766.700.950.07
CK-17.4312,458.3710,510.840.980.02
CK-36.7110,703.709766.700.970.04
Table
Table 3. Pearson correlations coefficient between the relative abundance of the dominant bacterial genera and environment factors.
Table 3. Pearson correlations coefficient between the relative abundance of the dominant bacterial genera and environment factors.
SphingomonasGp6GemmatimonasNocardioidesGaiellaAciditerrimonasSaccharibacteria
EC0.1350.4630.643 *−0.747 *0.365−0.201−0.764 **
SWC0.3510.785 *0.722 *−0.678 *0.146−0.434−0.763 *
SOC0.5760.4140.347−0.820 **−0.106−0.321−0.797 **
TN0.2530.2390.292−0.839 **0.0550.023−0.870 **
AP0.602 *−0.190−0.191−0.522−0.317−0.151−0.485
AK0.526−0.112−0.054−0.581 *−0.115−0.177−0.582
Sand−0.139−0.277−0.5080.576−0.3990.1090.621 *
The correlations are significant at the 0.05 level. * indicates p < 0.05; ** indicates p < 0.01.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruan, M.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, T. Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Properties on Tetraena mongolica in the Arid and Semi-Arid Regions, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145142

AMA Style

Ruan M, Zhang Y, Chai T. Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Properties on Tetraena mongolica in the Arid and Semi-Arid Regions, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(14):5142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruan, Mengying, Yuxiu Zhang, and Tuanyao Chai. 2020. "Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Properties on Tetraena mongolica in the Arid and Semi-Arid Regions, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 14: 5142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145142

APA Style

Ruan, M., Zhang, Y., & Chai, T. (2020). Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Properties on Tetraena mongolica in the Arid and Semi-Arid Regions, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145142

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop