Next Article in Journal
Temporal Kinematic Differences between Forward and Backward Jump-Landing
Next Article in Special Issue
Work-Family Conflict and Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese Employees: Cross-Level Interaction of Organizational Justice Climate and Family Flexibility
Previous Article in Journal
Correlation of COVID-19 Pandemic with Healthcare System Response and Prevention Measures in Saudi Arabia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Associated with the Health Literacy on Social Determinants of Health: A Focus on Socioeconomic Position and Work Environment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 18
10.3390/ijerph17186668
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Is Rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Jeopardised by Previous Fatiguing Exercise?

by
J. Arturo Abraldes
1,2,
Ricardo J. Fernandes
2,3,*,
Núria Rodríguez
4 and
Ana Sousa
5,6
1
Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain
2
Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
3
Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
4
Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Catholic University of San Antonio, 30107 Murcia, Spain
5
Research Center for Sports, Exercise and Human Development, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
6
University Institute of Maia, 4475-690 Maia, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(18), 6668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186668
Submission received: 9 August 2020 / Revised: 2 September 2020 / Accepted: 11 September 2020 / Published: 13 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Contemporary and Emerging Issues of Occupational Safety and Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Survival outcomes increase significantly when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is provided correctly, but rescuer’s fatigue can compromise CPR delivery. We investigated the effect of a 100-m maximal run on CPR and physiological variables in 14 emergency medical technicians (age 29.2 ± 5.8 years, height 171.2 ± 1.1 cm and weight 73.4 ± 13.1 kg). Using an adult manikin and a compression-ventilation ratio of 30:2, participants performed 4-min CPR after 4-min baseline conditions (CPR) and 4-min CPR after a 100-m maximal run carrying emergency material (CPR-run). Physiological variables were continuously measured during baseline and CPR conditions using a portable gas analyzer (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy) and analyzed using two HD video cameras (Sony, HDR PJ30VE, Japan). Higher VO2 (14.4 ± 2.1 and 22.0 ± 2.5 mL·kg−1·min−1) and heart rate (123 ± 17 and 148 ± 17 bpm) were found for CPR-run. However, the compression rate was also higher during the CPR-run (373 ± 51 vs. 340 ± 49) and between every three complete cycles (81 ± 9 vs. 74 ± 14, 99 ± 14 vs. 90 ± 10, 99 ± 10 vs. 90 ± 10, and, 101 ± 15 vs. 94 ± 11, for cycle 3, 6, 9 and 12, respectively). Fatigue induced by the 100-m maximal run had a strong impact on physiological variables, but a mild impact on CPR emergency medical technicians’ performance.

1. Introduction

High quality chest compressions are crucial for successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and poor application can compromise the emergency situation outcome [1]. Several studies have indicated a significant relationship between survival outcomes and CPR quality, particularly chest compression depth [2,3], rate [4] and fraction [5]. The current guidelines (the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC)) describe standard CPR as administrated using a single approach for all adult patients—30:2 compress/ventilation ratio [6,7]—with chest compressions delivered at a rate and depth of at least 100 to 120 compressions/min and 5 cm (but no more than 6 cm), allowing full chest recoil between compressions and minimizing interruptions [6]. However, there are several physiological constraints that can significantly affect application in accordance with current guidelines and, therefore, compromise the CPR result [8].
The delivery of high-quality manual chest compressions is challenging. Rescuer’s fatigue is a likely contributor to variability of application and, thus, inflation quality during resuscitation [1]. CPR after a life-threatening emergency is sometimes performed with the technician in a non-resting state, since he/she might perform an intense run from the emergency vehicle to the person in need. This can lead to rescuer fatigue and chest compressions depth can degrade after 1 min of CPR delivery [9] (degrading continuously up to 3 min [10]). Rescuers themselves are not able to recognize when fatigue begins to affect their performance [11]. Furthermore, it is known that patient’s survival following CPR after cardiac arrest depends on adequate myocardial blood flow [12,13], which is more adequately provided when end tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) is monitored [14]. In fact, PetCO2 serves as a non-invasive measurement of blood flow generated by chest compression during resuscitation [15]. Low PetCO2 values during CPR have been associated with decreased return of spontaneous circulation rates and increased mortality, and high PetCO2 values related with a better return of spontaneous circulation rates and survival [16,17]. Optimal values of this variable depend on chest compression quality, ventilation rate and tidal volume [18], all of which might deteriorate with rescuer fatigue.
Although a direct relationship between survival outcomes and CPR quality variables has been shown, most studies analyzed rescuer’s fatigue during the specific CPR application period. Nevertheless, information on the effect of preceding strenuous exercise on the quality of chest compressions is limited. It is still unclear if high-quality inflation and chest compression is influenced by fatigue experienced in a typical CPR emergency setting. These findings can provide knowledge leading to better training and education for those providing CPR and, therefore, improve survival outcomes. Our purpose was to analyze the effect of a fatigue inducing 100 m maximal run with equipment on CPR performance and cardiorespiratory demand. It was hypothesized that previous exercise would induce a higher CPR physiological demand, even in well trained personnel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

Fourteen (nine males and five females) CPR trained (4–6 h in 2–3 weekly training sessions) and moderately active certified emergency medical technicians participated in the current study. They obtained their diploma from the Spanish Lifesaving Royal Federation, which follows the study plan of the International Lifesaving Federation. Their main characteristics were: 29.6 ± 6.3 vs. 28.6 ± 5.7 years, 177.1 ± 4.7 vs. 160.1 ± 13.6 cm and 78.6 ± 10.5 vs. 64.1 ± 12.9 kg for male and female (respectively). Individual written informed consent was provided, and participants were familiarized with the testing procedures during a pre-experiment session. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and journal guidelines. The ethics committee of the local institution approved the study design (Lifesaving Federation of Galicia code no. 2352/2015).

2.2. Design

After standing upright for 4 min to assess baseline physiological variables, participants performed a 4 min mouth-to-mouth CPR on an adult manikin (Laerdal® Resusci Anne Torso; Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway) with a 30:2 compression-ventilation ratio and 5 cm compression depth (in accordance with stablished guidelines [7,19]. At the end of the 4 min CPR, participants reassumed the upright position to recover for 4 min or until the baseline physiological values were reached. Then, participants performed a 100 m straight run (± 2° decline) at maximal intensity carrying standard emergency material (~10 kg) followed by 4 min mouth-to-mouth CPR, and a 4 min recovery period (as previously described; see Figure 1: CPR-run). In both experimental procedures, due to the fact that the participant was wearing the physiological testing mask, the two mouth-to-mouth ventilations were simulated, on the manikin after each 30-compression cycle.

2.3. Methodology

Gas exchange variables were continuously measured breath-by-breath during baseline, CPR and recovery periods using a telemetric portable gas analyzer (K4b2, Cosmed, Rome, Italy) placed near the rescuers center of mass, adding only 800 g to their total weight (for a detailed analysis of this apparatus and its use in different exercise mode settings see [20,21]. The gas analyzer and the turbine volume transducer were calibrated before each test with gases of known concentration (16% O2 and 5% CO2) and a 3 L syringe, respectively. Heart rate (HR) was monitored continuously with a Polar Vantage NV (Polar electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) that telemetrically transferred data to the K4b2 portable unit. In addition, in both tests, the 4 min CPR procedure was recorded using two HD video cameras (Sony, HDR PJ30VE, Japan; 100 Hz frequency) placed frontal and laterally on rigid tripods (HAMA Star 63, Spain) at 1 m height and 3 m distance from the participant to assure the procedure quality. The temporal analysis of the CPR techniques was done manual and independently by two experts, using Media Player Classic Home Cinema (MPC-HC v.1.7.10. 64 bits, Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA) with a 0.96 intra-test correlation.
Initially, errant breaths (e.g., coughing and signal interruptions), which do not truly represent the physiological functioning during exercise, were omitted from the oxygen uptake (VO2) analysis by including only those that were between mean ± four standard deviations [22]. Afterwards, individual breath-by-breath VO2 responses were smoothed using a three-breath moving average and time averaged every 10s [22]. Respiratory frequency (RF), tidal volume (TV), minute ventilation (VE), VO2, volume of carbon dioxide expired (VCO2), HR, respiratory quotient (R) and PetCO2 were measured throughout the 4 min baseline (4 min average) and the 4 min in both CPR tests (4 min average and average over each min). The total number of compressions were determined in both 4 min CPR conditions and the compression rate was measured over the first, second, third and fourth three complete CPR cycles (compressions 1–90, 91–180, 181–270 and 271–360, respectively). The correct depth of the compressions (5 cm) was controlled by an acoustic signal placed on the adult manikin. Therefore, for analysis purposes, the compressions that induced an acoustic signal were considered “correct” and the remaining the “incorrect”. The task intensity was rated after all CPR conditions using the Borg scale (RPE) [23].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All physiological and CPR related variables were checked for normality and homogeneity using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and reported as mean ± SD. Differences between CPR protocols were tested using a paired t-test and, when different cycles were analyzed within the same condition. An ANOVA for repeated measures was conducted (significant effects were further explored using Bonferroni post hoc procedures). Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was used to test the relationships between all variables. Magnitudes of standardized effects |f| were determined against the following criteria: small (0.2–0.5), moderate (0.5–0.8) and large (>0.8). All statistical procedures were conducted with SPSS 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

The fatigue inducing 100 m run lasted 28 ± 8 s, with Table 1 showing the values of the cardiopulmonary variables assessed during baseline and over each min of the CPR tests. Apart from RF (in both 2nd and 3rd min) and PetCO2 (in the 3rd min), the 100 m run produced higher overall values for all physiological variables (p < 0.001). In addition, higher values (p < 0.001) were observed for all variables over the 4 min during CPR-run compared with the CPR condition (except for PetCO2). Concomitantly CPR-run presented higher RPE values compared with CPR (5.2 ± 1.6 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9 a.u. in a scale of 0 to 10 units; p < 0.001). The percentage of change relative to the 1st min in both CPR and CPR-run conditions is presented in Figure 2.
In the CPR condition, VO2, VCO2, HR and PetCO2-1st min were lower from the 2nd min (p ≤ 0.02; η2 = 0.62, 0.51, 0.22 and 0.88, respectively), and VE, VO2, VCO2 and PetCO2-2nd min were lower compared to the 3rd min (p ≤ 0.03). TV and R-2nd min were lower than the 1st and 4th min (p ≤ 0.02), and VE-3rd min was higher and -4th min lower compared to the -1st min (p ≤ 0.01). In CPR-run, VO2, VCO2 and PetCO2-1st min were higher compared to the 2nd min (p < 0.001; η2 = 0.77, 0.86 and 0.89), and TV, VE, VO2, VCO2, HR and PetCO2 evidenced a similar behavior since the 2nd min was higher compared with the 3rd and 4th min (p ≤ 0.02). TV, VE and HR were lower at the 3rd comparing to the 1st min (p ≤ 0.01), but higher than the 4th min (p ≤ 0.03). Both VO2 and HR-2nd min were lower than the 1st min (p ≤ 0.04), but higher than the 3rd and 4th min (p ≤ 0.02). VO2 and HR-4th min were also lower compared with the 1st min (p < 0.001). Both R-2nd and 3rd min were higher than the 4th min (p < 0.001), with this latter value being lower compared with the 1st min (p < 0.03). PetCO2 mean values were different in-between min and RF values were similar over each min in both CPR and CPR-run conditions.
The compression rate and correct/incorrect compressions assessed from the first to the last complete three CPR cycles, as well as the total number of compressions in both tests, are displayed in Figure 3. The compression frequency was higher in the CPR-run than in the CPR condition (373 ± 51 vs. 340 ± 49; p = 0.004), but values were highly correlated (r = 0.85; p = 0.002). For all cycles, the compression rate was also greater for CPR-run compared to CPR (80.9 ± 9.8 vs. 73.9 ± 14.2, 99.4 ± 14.3 vs. 90.2 ± 10.5, 99.1 ± 13.2 vs. 92.2 ± 10.1 and 101.2 ± 15.2 vs. 93.9 ± 10.6 for cycles three, six and nine and 12; p ≤ 0.02). In addition, the compression rate from the first to the remaining subsequent three CPR complete cycles were lower in both conditions (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.84 and 0.83 for CPR and CPR-run). No differences were found between correct and incorrect compressions in either condition.

4. Discussion

The purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of fatigue on CPR and cardiopulmonary variables in certified emergency medical technicians. Our hypothesis was partially verified since the 100 m maximal run had a strong physiological impact during CPR. However, previous fatiguing exercise had no evident influence on CPR compression rate and depth (comparing to the values obtained after a 4 min resting period). Thus, even if the 100 m maximal run performed by the rescuers was not up to the level of elite runners, medical personnel seem to be sufficiently well prepared for doing it fast and maintain the CPR quality when in a fatigue state.
Recently, the European Resuscitation Council has recommended a TV range between 500 to 600 mL [6], a variable closely associated with peak airway pressure during CPR. In fact, managing peak airway pressure is fundamental to avoid stomach inflation and, by reducing TV, controlling peak flow rate [24]. In the current study, TV values over the 4 min CPR and CPR-run were 1360 and 2270 mL (ranging from 1300 to 1480 mL and 2000 to 2600 mL in the 1st and 4th min, respectively). TV was assessed through participants expired air (using a facemask), with the results being three to four-fold higher than the recommended ones. This suggests that they were high enough to ensure correct ventilation in the simulated CPR. In fact, this excess in ventilation volume and flow rate were recently reported in two studies conducted with lifeguards [18,22].
Lower TV (~500 vs. 1000 mL) in adult patients with respiratory arrest maintains good oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination (while decreasing peak airway pressure), making stomach inflation less likely [24]. In the current study, TV was higher in CPR-run compared with CPR and, although the time necessary to run the 100 m to reach the manikin was short (<30 s), it induced a higher cardiopulmonary response clearly visible along the 4 min CPR. This was also reflected by the higher RPE values reported in the CPR-run condition (~3 vs. 5 a.u.), as well as by the ~27 and 30 breaths/min of RF (or ventilation rate) for CPR and CPR-run. By extrapolating from compression rate values (~85 and 93 per min for CPR and CPR-run), it was shown that our participants performed ~6 breaths/min in the manikin, less than the 10 to 12 breaths/min suggested in international resuscitation guidelines [6]. However, no relevant differences in ventilation rate between survivors and non-survivors was previously reported [25]. As was the case for TV, RF was also higher in CPR-run compared to the CPR condition.
Complementarily to the high quality chest compressions and ventilation, PetCO2 is a fundamental CPR survival outcome, evaluating cardiac output at low-flow rates and helping assess CPR effectiveness [6]. Of the evaluated cardiopulmonary outcomes, only PetCO2 showed a similar behaviour in the overall 4 min CPR and CPR-run (~33 vs. 32 mmHg). This ranged from ~24 to 27 mmHg in patients that had in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and is independent of compression rate [26]. When ventilation is held constant, ideally in both rate and tidal volume, PetCO2 becomes an excellent measure of pulmonary blood flow [13]. In the current study, even if not directly measured in the manikin (but through the rescuers expired air), PetCO2 mean values found suggest that a CPR of adequate quality was provided. In support of our results, a cut point of 25.5 mmHg was established for initial PetCO2 [15]. For patients with initial PetCO2 < 25.5 mm Hg, survival benefit ceased at an earlier point in resuscitation, whereas above this threshold, the probability of survival cumulatively increased for a longer period. Optimal PetCO2 depend also, among other factors, on chest compression quality, ventilation rate and tidal volume [18] all which deteriorate with fatigue and, although a similar behavior was observed in the overall 4 min CPR, it was higher in the 1st, 2nd and 4th min of the CPR-run.
The influence of fatigue on CPR performance is shown in Figure 2. The change (compared to the 1st min) in the CPR outcomes showed an increase of ~32% on average (ranging 5 to 45%) for all cardiopulmonary variables (except for TV-2nd min and R). In contrast, all cardiopulmonary variables decreased ~15% (from 2 to 38%) along the CPR-run (except the R-2nd min), indicating physiological fatigue induced by the previous 100 m maximal run (as previously suggested [21]). In addition, the mean R value, a well-accepted indicator of exercise intensity, was higher in the CPR-run than in the CPR condition (1.25 vs. 0.92, ranging from 1.27 to 1.16 and 0.97 to 0.92, respectively), also suggesting that a previous intensive exercise leads to a relevant physiological fatigue during CPR.
In the current study, the mean VO2 and HR in the CPR condition represented only a moderate physiological demand (14.4 mL·kg−1·min−1 and 123 bpm, ranging between 11.4–16.5 mL·kg−1·min−1 and between 115–130 bpm). Similar metabolic demands were previously reported [27,28]. However, emergency medical technicians setting mostly involve being at rest, but with the occasional requirement to handle CPR in a limited time period after running at a high intensity to get to the victim as quickly as possible. The mean cardiovascular demands associated with performing this specific task were significantly higher (22 mL·kg−1·min−1 and 142 bpm, ranging between 13.3–27.2 mL·kg−1·min−1 and between 144–155 bpm) and approximately equivalent to those seen at continuous moderate intensity (60–70% of maximum intensity) in a range of different exercise modes [20]. In healthy subjects, this is the highest work percentage recommended to avoid excessive anaerobic metabolism and fatigue. Considering that the energetic demands placed on the rescuer depend upon the specific role assumed (e.g., performing on a flat surface, steep slope, stairs), rescuers occupational health training should include a variety of different exercises covering potential incident situations.
International resuscitation guidelines recommend that chest compressions should be delivered at a rate of, at least, 100 to 120 compressions/min [6], with a prompt CPR delivery having an essential role in the survival chain for cardiac arrest resuscitation. In fact, a recent work has demonstrated that return of spontaneous circulation from in-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with higher chest compression rates, consistent with out-of-hospital studies of CPR quality [29,30]. However, in the current study, the number of compressions/min were slightly lower than that suggested (~85 and 93 compressions/min for CPR and CPR-run), which is in line with six independent studies reporting that survivors have received 85 to 100 compressions/min chest compression rates, compared with non-survivors who received a lower rate [25]. In the current study, the compression rate over the first three complete cycles was lower than the subsequent three CPR complete cycles for both CPR and CPR-run (~74 and 80 compressions/min), underestimating the total number of compressions assessed over the 4 min (373 vs. 340 compressions/min). In fact, the second, third and fourth three complete CPR cycles (cycle three, six, nine and 12, respectively), in both conditions, were very close to those recommend from international resuscitation guidelines [6].
Unexpectedly, but in line with a previous 100 m simulated in-water rescue study [21], the mechanical related fatigue did not decisively influence rescuers CPR-run performance. In fact, the compression rate was higher for CPR-Run compared with the non-fatigue state corroborating previous findings that after a simulated water-rescue the rate of compressions increased compared to a resting control setting [31]. We have tried to upgrade Sousa et al. [21] results by analyzing characterizing in more detail the fatigue-induced deterioration over the four complete CPR cycles, focusing on the number of correct/incorrect compressions (defined as 30 and <30, respectively). In the literature [9,11], compressions were judged as correct if both depth and placement were in accordance with standard advanced cardiac life support guidelines. The % of correct and incorrect compressions, as well as the total number of compressions per min, remained similar from the 1st to the 5th (last) min of CPR. High-quality chest compressions are a key determinant of patient survival, although the sustained delivery of high-quality CPR is infrequently achieved in clinical practice.
Notwithstanding, it has been suggested that values equal to or greater than 70% effective compression and ventilation will deliver, CPR of sufficient quality [32]. The mean relative values for correct compressions in CPR condition was always greater than 70% (79% in average). However, in the CPR-run condition this value was 71%, when in cycle 1 was achieved 69% with the lowest value in cycle nine (61%). Therefore, our results show that the fatigue caused by the execution of the 100 m maximal run had some impact on quality, at least, in the beginning and near the end of the 4 min CPR. This may be due to anthropometric differences and the physical capacities of the rescuers. It was suggested that physical fatigue affects males less and with a BMI ≤ 25 kg·m2 [33]. From the 14 participants of the current study, five were females and with a BMI of 25 kg·m2, which could help explain the confounding results. Training could also be a variable that influences results and would be a key point in the good execution of CPR. The present results seem to suggest that, and although considering the absence of differences between correct and incorrect compressions, as well as the higher number of compressions in each three complete CPR cycles and over the 4 min CPR, previous fatiguing exercise might have jeopardized the quality of chest compressions.

5. Conclusions

The 100 m maximal run induce a relevant physiological stress over each min and in the overall 4 min CPR compared with starting a CPR from a resting state. The previous induced fatigue was not reflected in the quality of CPR since the total number of compressions and the compression rate from the first and three subsequent complete cycles were higher in CPR-run than in CPR. However, previous fatiguing exercise might have jeopardized the quality of chest compressions, as this was lower than 70% correct compressions during half of the 4-min CPR duration. This physiological constraint should be taken into consideration during the training process of certified rescuers, helping them to deal with this in emergency situations. Meanwhile, although the CPR was performed direct on the manikin, the ventilations were not (due to the breathing facemask worn by the rescuers). Therefore, in future studies, it will be important to use the new generation devices (that are already available) to measure rescuers ventilatory variables while performing CPR in line with European Resuscitation Council guidelines.

Author Contributions

A.S. and J.A.A. conceived the study, designed the trial, and obtained research funding. R.J.F. and N.R. supervised the conduct of the trial and data collection. N.R. and J.A.A. undertook recruitment of participating centers and participants and managed the data, including quality control. A.S. provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. A.S. and R.J.F. drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Lifesaving Federation of Galicia, Spain, for their outstanding technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sugerman, T.; Edelson, P.; Leary, M.; Weidman, K.; Herzberg, L.; Hoek, L.V.; Becker, B.; Abella, S. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: A prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation 2009, 80, 981–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Vadeboncoeur, T.; Stolz, U.; Panchal, A.; Silver, A.; Venuti, M.; Tobin, J.; Smith, G.; Nunez, M.; Karamooz, M.; Spaite, D. Chest compression depth and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2014, 85, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stiell, I.G.; Brown, S.P.; Nichol, G.; Cheskes, S.; Vaillancourt, C.; Callaway, C.W.; Morrison, L.J.; Christenson, J.; Aufderheide, T.P.; Davis, D.P. What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients? Circulation 2014, 130, 1962–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Idris, A.H.; Guffey, D.; Pepe, P.E.; Brown, S.P.; Brooks, S.C.; Callaway, C.W.; Christenson, J.; Davis, D.P.; Daya, M.R.; Gray, R. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 43, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Christenson, J.; Andrusiek, D.; Everson-Stewart, S.; Kudenchuk, P.; Hostler, D.; Powell, J.; Callaway, C.W.; Bishop, D.; Vaillancourt, C.; Davis, D. Chest compression fraction determines survival in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 2009, 120, 1241–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Neumar, R.; Shuster, M.; Callaway, C.; Gent, L.; Atkins, D.; Bhanji, F.; Brooks, S.; Caen, A. 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015, 115, S315–S367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Perkins, G.D.; Handley, A.J.; Koster, R.W.; Castrén, M.; Smyth, M.A.; Olasveengen, T.; Monsieurs, K.G.; Raffay, V.; Gräsner, J.-T.; Wenzel, V. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015, 95, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Talikowska, M.; Tohira, H.; Bailey, P.; Finn, J. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: Widespread variation in data intervals used for analysis. Resuscitation 2016, 102, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ochoa, F.J.; Ramalle-Gomara, E.; Lisa, V.; Saralegui, I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation 1998, 37, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ashton, A.; McCluskey, A.; Gwinnutt, C.; Keenan, A. Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min. Resuscitation 2002, 55, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hightower, D.; Thomas, S.; Stone, C.; Dunn, K.; March, J. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1995, 26, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kalenda, Z. The capnogram as a guide to the efficacy of cardiac massage. Resuscitation 1978, 6, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kern, K.B.; Sanders, A.B.; Voorhees, W.D.; Babbs, C.F.; Tacker, W.A.; Ewy, G.A. Changes in expired end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs: A prognostic guide for resuscitation efforts. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1989, 13, 1184–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sutton, R.M.; French, B.; Meaney, P.A.; Topjian, A.A.; Parshuram, C.S.; Edelson, D.P.; Schexnayder, S.; Abella, B.S.; Merchant, R.M.; Bembea, M. Physiologic monitoring of CPR quality during adult cardiac arrest: A propensity-matched cohort study. Resuscitation 2016, 106, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Wang, A.-Y.; Huang, C.-H.; Chang, W.-T.; Tsai, M.-S.; Wang, C.-H.; Chen, W.-J. Initial end-tidal CO2 partial pressure predicts outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2016, 34, 2367–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Grmec, Š.; Križmarič, M.; Mally, Š.; Koželj, A.; Špindler, M.; Lešnik, B. Utstein style analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—Bystander CPR and end expired carbon dioxide. Resuscitation 2007, 72, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kolar, M.; Križmarić, M.; Klemen, P.; Grmec, Š. Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide successful predicts cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field: A prospective observational study. Critical Care 2008, 12, R115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Iserbyt, P.; Schouppe, G.; Charlier, N. A multiple linear regression analysis of factors affecting the simulated Basic Life Support (BLS) performance with Automated External Defibrillator (AED) in Flemish lifeguards. Resuscitation 2015, 89, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2000, 102, 2135–2302.
  20. Sousa, A.; Figueiredo, P.; Zamparo, P.; Pyne, D.B.; Vilas-Boas, J.P.; Fernandes, R.J. Exercise modality effect on bioenergetical performance at VO2max intensity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015, 47, 1705–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sousa, A.; Fernandes, R.J.; Rodríguez, N.; Abraldes, J.A. Influence of a 100-M Simulated In-Water Rescue on Cardiopulmonary Parameters. Prehosp. Emerg. Care 2017, 21, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. De Jesus, K.; Guidetti, L.; de Jesus, K.; Vilas Boas, J.P.; Baldari, C.; Fernande, R. Which are the best VO2 sampling intervals to characterize low to severe swimming intensities? Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2014, 35, 1030–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Borg, G.A. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1982, 14, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wenzel, V.; Keller, C.; Ahamed, I.; Dorges, V.; Lindner, K.; Brimacombe, J. Effects of samller tidal volumes during basic life support ventilation in patients with respiratory arrest: Good ventilation, less risk? Resuscitation 1999, 43, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wallace, S.; Abella, S.; Becker, B. Quantifying the effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality on cardiac arrest outcome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2013, 6, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Sheak, K.; Douglas, W.; Leary, M.; Babaeizadeh, S.; UYuen, T.; Zive, D.; Owens, P.; Edelson, D.; Daya, M.; Idris, A.; et al. Quantitative relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide and CPR quality during both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015, 89, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miles, D.; Underwood, J.P.; Nolan, D.; Frey, M.; Gotshall, R. Metabolic, hemodynamic, and respiratory responses to performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Can. J. Appl. Sport Sci. 1984, 9, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  28. Buono, M.J.; Golding, L. The energy cost of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1980, 12, 118. [Google Scholar]
  29. Abella, B.S.; Sandbo, N.; Vassilatos, P.; Alvarado, J.P.; O’Hearn, N.; Wigder, H.N.; Hoffman, P.; Tynus, K.; Vanden Hoek, T.L.; Becker, L.B. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: A prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 2005, 111, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gallagher, E.J.; Lombardi, G.; Gennis, P. Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 1995, 274, 1922–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gómez, C.A.; Pérez, V.R.; Furelos, R.J.B.; Palacios-Aguilar, J. Efecto de la fatiga física del socorrista en los primeros cuatro minutos de la reanimación cardiopulmonar posrescate acuático. Emerg. Rev. Soc. Española Med. Urgenc. Y Emerg. 2013, 25, 184–190. [Google Scholar]
  32. Perkins, G.D.C.M.; Simons, R. Training manikins. In Abc Of Resuscitation, 5th ed.; Colqu-houn, M.H.A., Evans, T.R., Eds.; BMJ Publishing Group: London, UK, 2004; pp. 97–101. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hong, D.Y.; Park, S.O.; Lee, K.R.; Baek, K.J.; Shin, D.H. A different rescuer changing strategy between 30: 2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation that considers rescuer factors: A randomised cross-over simulation study with a time-dependent analysis. Resuscitation 2012, 83, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 17 06668 g001 550
Figure 1. Testing protocols: (i) 4-min baseline + 4-min cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) + 4-min recovery (upper panel) and (ii) 4-min baseline + 100-m Run with the material + 4-min CPR + 4-min recovery (lower panel). The manikin used is in accordance with the American Heart Association (AHA) and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for CPR practice.
Figure 1. Testing protocols: (i) 4-min baseline + 4-min cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) + 4-min recovery (upper panel) and (ii) 4-min baseline + 100-m Run with the material + 4-min CPR + 4-min recovery (lower panel). The manikin used is in accordance with the American Heart Association (AHA) and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for CPR practice.
Ijerph 17 06668 g001
Ijerph 17 06668 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage of change of the cardiopulmonary variables in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th min relative to the 1st min in CPR (A) and CPR-Run (B) conditions (the horizontal dashed line represents the 1st-min mean value). 1,2,3,4 Different from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th min, respectively; * 1st-min different from all min (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Percentage of change of the cardiopulmonary variables in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th min relative to the 1st min in CPR (A) and CPR-Run (B) conditions (the horizontal dashed line represents the 1st-min mean value). 1,2,3,4 Different from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th min, respectively; * 1st-min different from all min (p < 0.05).
Ijerph 17 06668 g002
Ijerph 17 06668 g003 550
Figure 3. Mean ± SD values for compression rate and total number of compressions (A), and mean relative values for correct and incorrect compressions (B) over the first, second, third and fourth (cycle three, six, nine and 12, respectively) three complete CPR cycles, when preceded by 4-min baseline (CPR) and 100 m maximal run (CPR-Run), conditions; three, six, nine, 12 different from cycles three, six, nine and 12 of the CPR-Run condition, respectively; # different from cycles six, nine and 12 within the same condition; * differences between CPR and CPR-Run condition (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Mean ± SD values for compression rate and total number of compressions (A), and mean relative values for correct and incorrect compressions (B) over the first, second, third and fourth (cycle three, six, nine and 12, respectively) three complete CPR cycles, when preceded by 4-min baseline (CPR) and 100 m maximal run (CPR-Run), conditions; three, six, nine, 12 different from cycles three, six, nine and 12 of the CPR-Run condition, respectively; # different from cycles six, nine and 12 within the same condition; * differences between CPR and CPR-Run condition (p < 0.05).
Ijerph 17 06668 g003
Table
Table 1. Mean ± SD values for the cardio-pulmonary variables assessed during baseline (base) and over each minute and over the 4-min in sessions 1 (CPR) and 2 (CPR-Run).
Table 1. Mean ± SD values for the cardio-pulmonary variables assessed during baseline (base) and over each minute and over the 4-min in sessions 1 (CPR) and 2 (CPR-Run).
VariablesRf
(b.min−1)		VT
(l)		VE
(l.min−1)		VO2
(ml/kg/min)		RVCO2
(ml.min−1)		HR
(bpm)		PetCO2
mmHg
CPRBase15.4 ± 3.71.1 ± 0.315.3 ± 3.56.2 ± 1.10.88 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.190 ± 1234.4 ± 2.5
1st min26.3 ± 8.9 11.30 ± 0.6 130.1 ± 8.4 111.4 ± 1.8 10.97 ± 0.0 10.81 ± 0.2 1115 ± 18 128.7 ± 4.4 1
2nd min29.6 ± 9.81.27 ± 0.4 233.9 ± 7.4 214.9 ± 1.9 20.87 ± 0.1 20.95 ± 0.2 2124 ± 15 230.8 ± 5.2 2
3rd min28.5 ± 7.71.46 ± 0.4 338.3 ± 7.7 316.5 ± 2.7 30.90 ± 0.0 31.09 ± 0.2 3128 ± 15 333.1 ± 4.6
4th min27.1 ± 7.2 41.48 ± 0.4 437.7 ± 9.3 416.0 ± 3.2 40.92 ± 0.1 41.08 ± 0.2 4130 ± 16 431.4 ± 4.4 4
4-min27.1 ± 8.3 *1.36 ± 0.4 *33.9 ± 7.3 *14.4 ± 2.1 *0.92 ± 0.1 *0.96 ± 0.2 *123 ± 17 *32.9 ± 5.0
CPR RunBase14.7 ± 1.21.1 ± 0.314.8 ± 2.57.7 ± 1.60.89 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.185 ± 1033.7 ± 2.1
1st min29.9 ± 5.82.6 ± 0.874.9 ± 17.327.2 ± 3.01.27 ± 0.12.51 ± 0.5155 ± 1539.6 ± 5.3
2nd min30.3 ± 5.62.48 ± 0.772.4 ± 17.722.8 ± 3.21.33 ± 0.12.24 ± 0.5154 ± 1337.2 ± 4.9
3rd min31.1 ± 5.72.20 ± 0.766.7 ± 16.719.8 ± 2.61.27 ± 0.11.86 ± 0.4148 ± 1533.7 ± 4.9
4th min32.1 ± 5.52.0 ± 0.562.6 ± 14.719.3 ± 2.91.16 ± 0.11.65 ± 0.3144 ± 1535.6 ± 5.4
4-min30.5 ± 5.82.27 ± 0.667.3 ± 15.022.0 ± 2.51.25 ± 0.12.01 ± 0.4148 ± 1731.9 ± 5.3
Rf: respiratory frequency; VT: tidal volume; VE: minute ventilation; VO2: volume of oxygen consumed; R: respiratory quotient; VCO2: volume of carbon dioxide expired; HR: heart rate; PetCO2: tidal carbon dioxide; 1, 2, 3, 4 significant different from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th minute of the CPR-Run condition, respectively; * significant different from CPR-Run condition.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abraldes, J.A.; Fernandes, R.J.; Rodríguez, N.; Sousa, A. Is Rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Jeopardised by Previous Fatiguing Exercise? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186668

AMA Style

Abraldes JA, Fernandes RJ, Rodríguez N, Sousa A. Is Rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Jeopardised by Previous Fatiguing Exercise? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(18):6668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186668

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abraldes, J. Arturo, Ricardo J. Fernandes, Núria Rodríguez, and Ana Sousa. 2020. "Is Rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Jeopardised by Previous Fatiguing Exercise?" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 18: 6668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186668

APA Style

Abraldes, J. A., Fernandes, R. J., Rodríguez, N., & Sousa, A. (2020). Is Rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Jeopardised by Previous Fatiguing Exercise? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186668

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop