Next Article in Journal
Measuring Air Quality for Advocacy in Africa (MA3): Feasibility and Practicality of Longitudinal Ambient PM2.5 Measurement Using Low-Cost Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Adsorption of Methylene Blue Dye by Calix[6]Arene-Modified Lead Sulphide (Pbs): Optimisation Using Response Surface Methodology
Previous Article in Journal
Country-Level Relationships of the Human Intake of N and P, Animal and Vegetable Food, and Alcoholic Beverages with Cancer and Life Expectancy
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Innovative in Situ Monitoring of Sulfate Reduction within a Wastewater Biofilm by H2S and SO42− Microsensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Reductive Defluorination and Mechanochemical Decomposition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): From Present Knowledge to Future Remediation Concepts

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Division 4.3 Contaminant Transfer and Environmental Technologies, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205 Berlin, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(19), 7242; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197242
Submission received: 14 September 2020 / Revised: 30 September 2020 / Accepted: 1 October 2020 / Published: 3 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Environmental Science and Technology)

Abstract

:
Over the past two decades, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have emerged as worldwide environmental contaminants, calling out for sophisticated treatment, decomposition and remediation strategies. In order to mineralize PFAS pollutants, the incineration of contaminated material is a state-of-the-art process, but more cost-effective and sustainable technologies are inevitable for the future. Within this review, various methods for the reductive defluorination of PFASs were inspected. In addition to this, the role of mechanochemistry is highlighted with regard to its major potential in reductive defluorination reactions and degradation of pollutants. In order to get a comprehensive understanding of the involved reactions, their mechanistic pathways are pointed out. Comparisons between existing PFAS decomposition reactions and reductive approaches are discussed in detail, regarding their applicability in possible remediation processes. This article provides a solid overview of the most recent research methods and offers guidelines for future research directions.

1. Introduction

Per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances (short PFASs), especially fluorinated organic surfactants, have emerged as a controversial compound class in the past decades. Anthropologically developed in the late 1940s for non-commercial use, PFASs were gradually established as versatile coatings of food-packings [1,2], outdoor apparel [3], as additives in chemical production (such as Teflon® production) [4,5] or highly effective flame retardants. The latter are often referred to as aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs), since fluorinated telomers, alkyl sulfonates as well as alkyl acids are applied as foam fire extinguishing agents against liquid fires (“Class B” fires) [6]. Due to their unique and remarkable properties, the majority of applied PFASs seem to be irreplaceable [7,8]. The increasing use of PFASs in day to day applications evidently lead to their increased environmental exposure, causing the substance class of PFASs to be under special observation over the last decade. Since long-chained perfluoro alkyl acids, sulfonic acids (C8-C14) as well as fluorinated alkyl ammonium and phosphates are amongst the main responsible environmental pollutants, research investigations were mainly focused on them [6].
Industrially, per- and polyfluorinated surfactants were synthesized mainly by electrochemical fluorination (ECF) or oxidation of either fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) or fluorotelomer sulfonyl chlorides (FTSCls). Both classes can be generated either by hydrolysis or the reaction of Na2S2O4 and N-Chlorosuccinimide (NCS) with the respective fluorotelomer halogens (FTHals) [9]. In contrast to the previous mentioned methods, perfluorinated alkyl acids and carboxylates were mainly produced by the oxidation and hydrolysis of perfluoroalkyl iodides (Figure 1). Due to their polyfluorinated chain structure, PFASs exhibit extraordinary chemical stability and can be described as both strongly lipophobic as well as hydrophobic (Figure 1) [6,10,11]. Compared to hydrocarbon-based surfactants, fluorinated surfactants exhibit significantly stronger pKa values due to their stronger electron-withdrawing substituents. Thus, trifluoro acetic acid (CF3COOH, pKa = 0.52) exhibits a significantly stronger Brønstedt acidity, compared to the non-fluorinated analogue acetic acid (CH3COOH, pKa = 4.76) [12]. Additionally, a higher degree of fluorination can be correlated to an increasing tendency towards formation of intra- and intermolecular interaction, mainly hydrogen bonding [13]. Moreover, most PFASs exhibit a much lower surface tension compared to their non-fluorinated derivatives, leading to unique wetting properties used in applications of, e.g., detergents [14]. Displaying a broad variety of unique properties, research and development intensively propelled the evolution of existing PFAS compounds over recent decades. Consistently, there are more than 4700 known and partly characterized compounds and precursors, respectively [15].
The enormous application potential of PFASs is contrasted by the lack of proper knowledge about the effects on flora and fauna and biocompatibility with respect to living beings, especially their harmful behavior towards human life. In 2001, the topic gained broader interest and attention after initial reports of the ubiquitous spread of PFASs and their impact on biological systems through environmental exposure [16]. Follow-up studies showed negative influences of PFASs on human metabolism and linked higher rates of physiologic diseases (e.g., lipid profile, diabetes or hypertension) [17,18]. In addition, several reports point out the possible interconnection of long-term PFOA and PFOS uptake and resulting organ damage or higher cancer rates, respectively [19,20]. The increasing number of scientific reports and proper investigations about the environmental impact and toxicity of PFASs eventually led to political debates and restriction on production, distribution and use of single PFASs in consumer products [10,21].
In Europe, the production and distribution of very persistent perfluorinated compounds (chain length C8-C14) are regulated by the REACH-enactment. Since 2009, the production and commercial application of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) has been heavily restricted, being classified as a “persistent organic pollutant” (POP) by the Stockholm Convention [22]. Analogously, the C8 chained perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) has been prohibited since 2020, leading to an adjustment of production and application towards shorter C4-C7-derivatives or substitution by polyfluorinated telomers [23].
After overcoming initial concerns, the worldwide research and investigation of (non)volatile poly- and perfluorinated alkylated compounds with respect to their environmental outcome and human exposure was strongly increased [21]. PFAS exposure led to the contamination of drinking water systems [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], river and lake sediments [32,33,34,35,36,37], soils [38,39,40], crops [41,42,43] and animals [44,45,46], as shown by numerous investigations. Moreover, PFASs were detected in deep ocean water samples [47], in the atmosphere [48] as well as in the Arctic environment [49]. Human PFAS intake is caused by the exposure of treated consumables but can be mainly traced back to the human food chain. Exhibiting a highly inert and persistent character, PFASs can be detected in various ecological systems all over the planet a long time after their exposure [26,27,46,50,51,52,53]. It was reported that PFASs can be mobilized in soils through the uptake of water, leading to the expansion of contamination in; e.g., agriculturally cultivated land [54,55]. The continuous release of contaminants induced by ground water flows and further water intake can cause a secondary contamination of natural water sources and adjacent watercourses, respectively [28].
On the one hand, the increasing numbers of studies reveal the true impact of PFAS exposure in the environment, but simultaneously show the enormous lack of knowledge and practical remediation applications. Current decontamination strategies of PFAS-burdened soils mainly consist of adsorption methods using PFAS adsorbents for fixation of PFAS pollutants in the ground. A second option is the utilization of a “pump and treat” process, cycling polluted soils through a washing plant leading to the concentration of the pollutants in the fine fraction. Only a subsequent, high-energy consuming pyrolysis process guarantees the total destruction of all fluorinated organic contaminants. Both approaches are cost-effective and not intended for the direct decomposition of all PFAS contaminants [56,57]. Hence, there is a great demand for innovative developments and chemical treatment technologies, dealing with new strategies of tackling the PFAS problem which are described in the following sections.

2. State-Of-The-Art Liquid Reactions

One of the biggest remediation challenges of PFAS contamination is the high persistence of perfluorinated molecules, originating from the extraordinary stable C−F bond ( D 0 C F   = 485 kJ/mol) [12]. Breaking these bonds requires a significantly higher amount of energy than used for the chemical degradation of chlorinated ( D 0 C C l   = 323 kJ/mol) and brominated ( D 0 C B r   = 269 kJ/mol) organic pollutants [58]. To lower the required energy amount, the use of catalytically active materials can be advisable [59,60,61]. The latest developments of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), including chemical oxidation (e.g., persulfate oxidation, ozonation), photooxidation, electrochemical or thermal oxidation, have been recently reviewed by several authors [62,63,64,65]. In contrast to oxidative processes, reduction involves the direct transformation of electrons from a reducing agent with a lower reduction potential compared to the substrate. Advanced reduction processes (ARPs), reductive metals (e.g., zero-valent iron (ZVI)), hydride radicals (H·) and most notably hydrated electrons (E0 = −2.9 V) have been used to achieve the effective cleavage of C−F bonds in PFASs [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. The investigation of PFAS reduction reactions have shown that they are sensitive towards the choice of reagents, their concentrations and reaction times as well as pH value of the solution [74,75,76], thus can show variable efficiencies. Hereafter, we give a detailed overview of recent developments of PFAS-degradation based on reductive defluorination.

2.1. Hydrothermal Treatment

The thermal decomposition of PFASs takes place between 200 and 800 °C [77]. In the absence of hydrogen sources, incomplete degradation takes place and usually yields shorter, more volatile PFASs and also exhibits a high global warming potential. For example, Sörengard et al. treated PFAS-contaminated soils directly in a furnace at 150–550 °C, where almost all added PFASs were degraded [78]. Additionally, the authors stated that supplementary air-phase vacuum filtration techniques are needed to separate the developing gaseous perfluoroalkyls. Yu et al. performed a hydrothermal liquefaction of wet PFAS-contaminated sewage sludge at 350 °C for 60 min [79]. More than 99% of perfluoroalkyl acids were degraded, but not totally defluorinated. In contrast, only a low amount of perfluoroalkyl sulfonates were degraded. In order to be converted into fuels, remaining short-chain PFASs require more sophisticated steps, including high temperature catalytic deoxygenation/denitration and cracking. Wu et al. used NaOH as additive for the hydrothermal degradation of PFOSs at 350 °C [80]. Subsequent 19F nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy measurements showed a complete conversion of C−F bonds to fluoride (2.5 g/L PFOS) within 40 min for a reaction with 1 M NaOH. Small quantities of short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids (≤1.5% of inserted PFOSs) were detected as transient intermediates, indicating that an initial OH-catalyzed cleavage of the sulfonate headgroup is followed by rapid sequential decarboxylation reactions, eventually leading to complete mineralization. Wang et al. recommended calcium hydroxide as the most effective Ca reagent for the PFAS defluorination of waste material at 400 °C because the carbon−fluorine bonds in PFASs can be converted to carbon−hydrogen bonds via the hydrodefluorination reaction [81]. Furthermore, PFASs with different chain lengths and functional groups were investigated showing that perfluoroalkyl sulfonates were more stable compared to perfluoroalkyl acids towards Ca treatment.

2.2. Biochemical/Microbial Degradation

In general, degradation by microorganisms (biodegradation) is one of the most important mechanisms by which organic contaminants are removed from the environment. The reductive dechlorination of aromatic compounds has been demonstrated for chlorinated benzenes, phenols, benzoates, biphenyls, and dioxins by bacteria in sediments [82]. However, precise biodegradation pathways and the ultimate fate of PFASs are still unknown [82]. Additionally, the strength of the carbon–fluorine bond is generally believed to be the main factor in limiting the mineralization of perfluorinated molecules. Thus, most microbial studies on PFASs only show a very low degradation rate of <5% [83]. Often, only the carboxylic C−C bond is degraded leading to the formation of shorter chain PFASs [84]. Sun et al. showed that several fluorotelomer alcohols can be biologically degraded to trifluoro acetic acid (TFA), the shortest perfluoroalkyl acid, during 32 days in a landfill soil microbial culture system [85]. Furthermore, Luo et al. showed a degradation of PFOA by enzyme-catalyzed oxidative humification reactions with soybean meal as mediator [86]. In the presence of soybean meal and laccase, PFOA was degraded 24% in water after 36 days and 40% in soil slurry after 140 days. However, only C−C bond degradation could be monitored, yielding various partially fluorinated organic compounds.

2.3. Photochemical Reduction

Oxidative and photochemical methods were often investigated in several research projects in the past [62,76,87]. The photochemical reduction was mainly performed with UV light and free reducing radicals formed from sulphite (SO32-), but other inorganic and organic compounds were also used. Song et al. successfully used UV light with sulphite for the defluorination of PFOA [67]. Their process led to a quantitative removal of PFOA after one hour and a defluorination ratio of 88.5% at reaction time of 24 h under an N2 atmosphere at 25 °C and a pH value of 10.3 in water. They also showed that NO3 has a negative influence on the degradation of PFOA. Gu et al. used a similar system and degraded 98% of PFOS at 25 °C and a pH of 9.2 with a defluorination rate of approximately 50% after 30 min [88]. Bentel and co-workers operated the UV/sulphite system with a higher pH of 12 [75]. This approach led to defluorination rates of 73–100% for various perfluoroalkyl acids after an 8-h treatment. This finding was assigned to an elevated OH concentration in solution since the degradation of PFASs in the presence of pure NaOH was reported previously (see also Section 2.1). In a different report, various perfluoroalkyl ether carboxylic acids (PFECAs) were degraded at a pH of 9.5 [73]. All compounds were degraded but the defluorination rates were only between 30 and 98% after 48 h of treatment. In a different study, the PFECA GenX (perfluoro(2-methyl-3-oxahexanoate ammonium salt) was degraded and defluorinated in a UV/sulphite system at pH 10 [89]. This resulted in a defluorination rate of >90% after a six-hour radiation treatment. In a comparable experiment, these authors performed a degradation of the PFAS monochlorinated-polyfluorinated-ether sulfonate (F-53B) from the chromium industry with a defluorination rate of 70% after a two-hour treatment [69]. Tenorio et al. used an AFFF concentrate as a PFAS source for the UV/sulphite photo reductive treatment at 20 °C and a pH of 9.5 [90]. The experiment resulted in an overall PFAS defluorination rate of 53% after 49 h treatment.
Another approach was taken by Qu et al. [66]. They used potassium iodide as a mediator for the UV treatment. Their experiment with PFOA was conducted under anaerobic conditions at pH 9. The resulting defluorination rate of PFOA reached 98.9%. Tang et al. used a Fenton system (FeIISO4/H2O2) for the photo reductive UV treatment of PFOA [91]. Within a reaction time of one hour, the added PFOA was rapidly degraded, resulting in a PFOA removal rate of 87.9% and a defluorination rate of 35.8%. After a reaction time of five hours the PFOA degradation rate and defluorination efficiency increased up to 95% and 53.2%, respectively. A photo reductive treatment with H2O2 and a water soluble tungstic heteropolyacid photocatalyst (H3PW12O4∙6H2O) was published by Hori et al. [92]. The combination of the photo active additives led to a defluorination rate of 88% after 24 h treatment. GalliumIII oxide was used in two studies for the photo reductive treatment of PFOA [93,94]. After three hours of UV treatment, 98.8% of PFOA was degraded and the defluorination rate was 31.6% under anaerobic conditions. Sahu et al. used a bismuth phosphate photocatalyst (Bi3O(OH)(PO4)2) for the UV treatment of PFOA [95]. This material showed quantitative PFOA degradation after one hour and a defluorination rate of approximately 60% after two hours, which was much higher than for other catalysts (Ga2O3, BiPO4 and TiO2) in this experiment. Additionally, TiO2 was utilized in combination with oxalic acid for the photocatalytic UV reduction in PFOA [96]. Under anaerobic conditions approximately 85% of PFOA was degraded and a defluorination rate of 16.5% was obtained after three hours of reaction time. Under aerobic conditions, no defluorination was possible. Furthermore, a combination of 3-indole-acetic-acid and an organo-modified montmorillonite was used [68]. In this reaction, the modified clay acts as electrostatic sorbent for PFAS molecules and simultaneously it can be used as stabilizing agent for hydrated electrons originating from photo excited 3-indole-acetic acid radical cations. For PFOA, quantitative degradation was obtained after five hours of treatment with a UV light accompanied by a defluorination rate larger than 90% within 10 h and up to 96% after 18 h treatment.

2.4. Hetero- and Homogenous Redox Catalysis

Additionally, heterogenous and homogenous catalysis were also studied in different ways to degrade and defluorinate PFASs in aqueous media. Hori et al. treated PFOS combined with iron powder in aqueous solution which was heated at 150–350 °C under an elevated pressure of 23.3 MPa for six hours [97]. When temperatures above 250 °C were reached, PFOSs could be degraded. At 350 °C, the degradation of PFOSs was completed but only approximately 50% of the fluorine mass was mineralized. Two different studies used titaniumIII citrate and vitamin B12 for the reduction of PFASs [98,99]. Exposed to anoxic aqueous conditions at 70 °C and pH 9, PFOSs were completely degraded to shorter chain derivatives by Ochoa-Herrera et al. Since reductive defluorination was the limitation in this approach, only 18% PFOS was defluorinated after seven days of reaction time [98]. Lee et al. used copper nanoparticles in addition to titaniumIII citrate and vitamin B12, resulting in a 65% degradation of PFOA after 24 h in an anoxic aqueous solution at 70 °C and pH of 9 [99]. Liu et al. modified the procedure of Ochoa-Herrera et al. and used a cobalt catalyst to degrade PFASs [100]. Additionally, NiFe supported on activated coal was utilized as a heterogenous catalyst in order to degrade PFOS at 50 °C. Interestingly, 94% of PFOSs could be degraded and defluorinated after a long lasting 120 days period at 22 °C [101]. Another approach was presented by Liu et al. where ZVI and biochar were applied to reduce seven different PFASs in aqueous solutions [102]. Using the combination of both reagents was more efficient than the single application of ZVI because of the better adsorption capacity of biochar for PFASs. The PFAS removal rate was between 20 and approximately 95% after 120 days of reaction time, depending on the kind of PFAS. However, the defluorination rate for PFOA and PFOS could never exceed 10% and 5%, respectively, which might be underestimated by the sorption of fluoride by ZVI and biochar.

3. Mechanochemical Decomposition of PFASs and Involved Reaction Mechanisms

A far more promising strategy in terms of the decomposition of fluorinated pollutants in solid matrices might be the application of ball milling. Although mechanochemistry (MC) was intensively studied with regard to the removal of chlorinated and brominated persistent organic pollutants (POPs), little is known about the mechanochemical impact on PFASs [103,104,105]. Until today, only few examples have been reported showing the chemical degradation of representative compounds—mainly PFOS and PFOA—in ball-milling chemistry. Since this technique delivers high amounts of friction energy required to trigger the oxidative or reductive decomposition of perfluorinated substances, specific attention is drawn to several MC approaches in this review. Two main MC reaction types were classified by Dubinskaya—one including the mechanical stress causing the deformation of the crystal lattice and molecular structure, leading to the disruption of intermolecular interactions. Second, mechanical friction causes valence bond deformation, leading to the cleavage of chemical bonds, oxidation and hydrolysis reactions of organic molecules. Additionally, ball milling-induced friction generates free radicals on the substrate surface, leading to the formation of radical pairs and excited states [106,107,108]. These types of reaction are fundamental for MC reactivity and can be applied to the explanation of complex reaction pathways. Known MC processes for decomposition of PFASs are summarized and described in detail in the following sections.

3.1. Lewis Base/Brönstedt Base-Assisted Reactions

A ground-breaking development was achieved when Baron and co-workers reported the mineralisation of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) in the presence of dried sodium hydroxide to NaF via nucleophilic exchange after one hour of ball-milling treatment [109]. The latter was performed with a zirconia pot and balls operating at 700 revolutions per minute (rpm) under ambient conditions. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and ion chromatography was used to show the formation of mineralized NaF and consumption of the polymeric vinylidene fluoride. Since the formation of water was observed, the suggested mechanism proposed the formation of polyvinyl alcohols, leading to subsequent condensation reactions to branched polyethers or -ketones. Most notably, a 90% defluorination of PVDF could only be achieved by the consequent removal of water during the milling treatment. Similar results on the degradation of PVDF were reported during the same year with the use of another basic compound. Zhang et al. showed a 98% reduction in the same starting material, when ball milling was applied in the presence of La2O3 for at least 240 min under identical reaction conditions [110]. Again, the use of XRD and FT-IR spectroscopy could prove the gradual reduction in PVDF and the formation of LaOF as a stable fluoride-containing product. Mechanistically, the authors claim the exchange of two fluoride atoms by one O2-, leading to the formation of polyketones or polyvinyl alcohol which can undergo intermolecular condensation reactions [110]. Shortly after this, La2O3 was used in the mechanochemical defluorination of polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) and was ground under the exact same reaction conditions. The reaction was reported to emanate from the oxide/fluoride exchange reaction leading to the formation of water, HF and CO2. Besides LaOF, La(CO3)F was observed as the primary mineralization product. When the reaction was performed at 600 °C, a decarboxylation reaction of the La(CO3)F was initiated, increasing the LaOF formation under the decomposition of PTFE [111]. In a similar manner, Zhang et al. performed the mechanochemical decomposition of PTFE with the aid of CaO and SrO, respectively [112]. The mineralization of organic fluorine to the very low soluble inorganic salts CaF2 and SrF2 as well as formation of CO gas, act as the driving force for breaking the strong C−F bonds of the fluorinated polymer. When SrO2 was used, the formation of SrF2 and direct carbonation of PTFE was observed. Analogous to previous experiments, the MC decomposition of polytetrafluoroethylene could be performed in the course of several hours.
The first notable tribochemical experiments on perfluorinated surfactants were carried out by Hosomi et al. in 2008 [113]. The group was able to fully decompose two of the most abundant PFASs: perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The reactions were performed in steel containers loaded with a mixture of PFASs and CaO with a molar ratio of 2.0:2.1 (F:Ca). After an 18 h milling time at 700 rpm, no further decomposition of either PFOS or PFOA was detected. XRD diffractograms and FT-IR spectra were recorded to monitor the formation of CaF2 and CaCO3 as mineralization products. Although no overall yields were reported, the successful use of a fluoride-accepting metal oxide as co-milling agent for the decomposition of molecular PFASs was shown for the first time. In 2013, a detailed study on the mineralization of PFOS and PFOA was published with the use of a nucleophilic base KOH [114]. After 4 h of ball milling at 275 rpm, an 88.3 and 96.7% fluoride recovery from PFOSs and PFOA was measured, due to the higher stability of the PFOS molecule towards nucleophilic attacks. After 6 h, the respective XRD patterns showed a complete defluorination and formation of KF and K2SO4/K2CO3, respectively. Interestingly, the reaction could only be conducted when an excess of the reagent KOH was used. The mechanism for the KOH-induced defluorination reaction of PFOSs and PFOA was proposed via a primary nucleophilic attack of a hydroxyl anion at the carbon atom of the terminal carboxylic acid group (PFOA) or at the sulfur atom of the terminal sulfonate group (PFOS). After the cleaving of the carbonate/sulfate group, a second hydroxide anion can undergo a nucleophilic substitution of one terminal fluoride atom leading to the formation of KF and polyfluoro alcohols. The subsequent exchange of fluoride with hydroxide eventually leads to the formation of water and carbon as well as KF (see also Figure 2). Due to FT-IR spectra, a fast degradation of both starting materials could be monitored after only 30 min, hence the authors claim the initial steps to be the fastest, whereas after the decarboxylation and loss of SO4 the reaction rate slowed down gradually.
Similar reaction rates were observed for homologous perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), perfluordecanoic acid (PFDA) and perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA), showing the high variety and low selectivity of the MC treatment [114].
Among hundreds of polyfluorinated chemicals, the PFOS derivative F-53B (see Figure 3) attracted more attention than others when it was first reported to be highly exposed in especially Chinese environmental soils and aquatic systems [115]. Having been used for decades mainly in the galvanic industry, the monosubstituted polyfluoroether sulfate was eventually rated and classified as a POP in the Stockholm Convention in 2009.
Initial MC defluorination attempts were performed by Huang et al. when they investigated the decomposition of F-53 and F-53B in the presence of KOH [116]. Using a steel-housed setup with rotation speeds of 275 rpm and an excess of KOH reagent, a full degradation of both compounds was achieved after six to eight hours of milling time. Since the degradation of F-53B follows first-order kinetics the monochloro-substituted compound could be degraded much faster than its perfluorinated derivative F-53. Using XRD, XPS as well as 19F NMR spectroscopy, they showed that F-53B was not only attacked by OH at the sulfonic group, but also the cleavage of the energetically weaker C−Cl bond occurred. Ion chromatography was implemented to show the mineralization products being fluorides, chlorides, sulfates as well as formates. Another group of widely used PFOS and PFOA alternatives are polyfluoro telomers. Although this compound class is regarded as less toxic and bioaccumulative, their representatives are still mainly persistent due to their slow-going and incomplete biodegradation [117]. An MC approach was first reported for the fluorotelomer 6:2-FTS (see Figure 3) in 2017, as complete decomposition was reached in less than one hour of tribochemical treatment with an excess of KOH. Analysis of the reaction pathway clarified that the presence of the significantly weaker C−H bonds (D0 = 417 kJ/mol) [12] in fluorotelomers leads to an efficient cleavage of the PFAS molecule and thus to faster decomposition times [118].
While most scientific studies on MC defluorination reactions are based on the use of an excess of the respective co-milling agent, the first stoichiometric activation was contributed in the work of Huang et al. in 2017 [119]. In a series of experiments including fluorinated surfactants PFOS and PFOA as well as PFHxS, PFBS, OBS, PFOS amide and F-53B (see Figure 3), stoichiometric amounts of La2O3 were successfully applied to decompose all PFASs in a course of up to ten hours. The transformation of organic fluoride into the inorganic fluorides La(CO3)F and LaOF as well as the formation of LaSO4 could be observed via X-ray diffraction. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) studies as well as 19F NMR spectroscopy revealed no detectable residual organofluorine compounds, indicating a complete degradation and defluorination of the systems. Mechanistically, Huang et al. propose a multi-strategical approach (Figure 4) [119]. After the mechanochemically induced excitation of an electron, a nucleophilic attack of a negatively charged oxygen moiety (radical ion O-.) is proposed at the electrophilic carbon or sulfur atom. After the loss of CO2 or SO3, the defluorination process is launched by two possible mechanistic pathways. One pathway is the carbonization of the PFAS molecule, induced by the transfer of a surface charge electron from a La2O3 molecule on the PFAS residue, leading to the cleavage of a C−F bond and release of F. Subsequent carbonization leads to a further release of fluoride ions and reduction in CF2 units to elemental carbon. The second proposed decomposition pathway of PFASs is induced by the oxidation of terminal carbon atoms by an oxidation agent such as La2O3. In this oxidative addition, the carbon is oxidized to RF-CO2 and reductively eliminated as La2(CO3)3, accompanied by the formation of La(CO3)F. Notably, the use of stoichiometric amounts of the Lewis base leads to a reaction rate of zeroth order, indicating its possible application as a catalytic system for PFAS degradation.

3.2. Lewis Acid-Assisted Reactions

In 2018, Tang et al. reported an unprecedented use of an aluminum oxide in defluorination reactions, when they performed an MC reaction between PFOA and Al2O3, leading to a 99.4% removal and 92.5% conversion of the starting material to a polyfluoroalkene product after two and a half hours [120]. By implementing a different approach, PFOA transformation into a fluorinated building block was detected. Using an excess of Al2O3 (molar ration 1:25), an almost quantitative formation of 1H-perfluorohept-1-ene (1H-1-PFHp) was observed after two and a half hours of co-grinding in a planetary ball mill at 350 rpm. When the reaction was performed with the shorter derivatives, PFHxA and PFBA, quantitative conversion to the respective polyfluoroalkenes 1H-perfluorohex-1-ene and 1H-perfluorobut-1-ene was observed. The reaction products were identified via gas chromatography (GC)- and LC-MS and more specifically with the help of solid state and liquid NMR spectroscopy of the 19F and 13C nuclei. The formation of fluoride ions was traced by the application of a fluoride sensitive electrode (F-ISE). Bearing both Lewis acid aluminum sites and Brønstedt acidic OH functionalities at the surface, Al2O3 has been shown to be a promising candidate in the activation of organohalides [121]. Based on FT-IR spectra, the initial mechanistic step was proposed to be the deprotonation of the carboxylic acid group by surface hydroxyl groups of alumina (see Figure 5). After subsequent decarboxylation, the interaction of the negatively charged fluoride moieties and Lewis acidic aluminum centers on the surface leads to elimination of fluoride and reprotonation. Thus, formation of Al−F species as well as the respective polyfluoroalkenes occur. Analogous behavior has been studied during the MC activation of PTFE with Al2O3 [122]. Since the reaction barrier for a subsequent defluorination is too high, no further reductive dehalogenation reaction can be observed. With their approach, Tang and co-workers provided a method for the defluorination of a wide range of PFASs under sustainable and cost-efficient conditions.
Unprecedent work was recently published by Buryak et al., mechanochemically activating the fluoropolymer PTFE by various zero-valent metals in the presence of hexanes as co-solvents [123]. Using excess powdered Mg, Ti and W metals as co-milling agents, medium-scale batches of PTFE (300g mixture) could be mechanochemically degraded into gaseous fluorocarbon monomers. Alongside the organic by-products, water and CO2 were identified as the major reaction products. Although the fate of the reducing agent is not highlighted and the existence of fluoride ions were not traced, it is believed that zero-valent metals were reduced to the respective metal fluorides via reductive dehalogenation reaction induced by ball-milling electron transfer.

3.3. Oxidant-Assisted Reactions

Due to their extraordinary bond strength, the majority of PFASs are chemically inert towards chemical oxidation reactions. Nonetheless, several commercially available oxidants such as H2O2, O3 or KMnO4 have been shown to be reactive towards PFASs, based on free radical electron oxidation processes [124]. Although widely applied in advanced oxidation processes and solution-based remediation strategies of persistent organic pollutants, [64,125] sodium persulfate (Na2S2O8, PS) was rarely used in the MC decomposition reactions of PFASs. In 2015, the first noted report showed the MC activation of the fluoro surfactant derivative F-53B (Figure 3) by the co-milling of persulfate and NaOH in a planetary ball mill [126]. After eight hours of reaction time, the formation of H2O inhibited further reaction progress. Eventually, 88% of the precursor was decomposed while the fluoride recovery efficiency yielded over 50%. The authors point out that a specific molar ratio of PS and hydroxide is a key element for the effective generation of hydroxide, superoxide and sulfate radical anions, leading to the decomposition and defluorination of the reacted F-53B (PS:NaOH:F-53B = 4.17:1.75:0.05). The suggested mechanistic pathway involves the radical hydroxyl anions, initiating the cleavage of the C−S bond of F-53B and subsequent nucleophilic substitutions at the fluorinated organic intermediates leading to the gradual shortening and mineralization of the polyfluorinated chain.
By replacing the co-milling agent NaOH with alumina, the synergetic effects of Al2O3 and PS lead to the complete defluorination of PFOA under the formation of HF [127]. The co-workers alongside Zhu and Tang were able to almost quantitatively mineralize PFOA and its homologues perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA), perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) after two hours of treatment at 350 rpm in a planetary ball mill. Most notably, full defluorination could only be reached through the adjustment of the ideal co-milling agent to substrate ratio. As depicted in Figure 6, all PFAS derivatives were gradually consumed, resulting in the formation of CO2 and hydrogen fluoride.
Mechanistically, an initial reaction step is the deprotonation of PFOA via the surface-bound oxygen atoms of Al2O3, whereas terminal hydroxyl functions act as catchers via intermolecular F···H−O interactions. High-energy ball-milling friction is claimed to cause the homolytic separation of PS, yielding sulfate radicals (SO4·). The latter can undergo radical coupling reactions with surface hydroxyl groups to form strong hydroxyl radicals that are known to play a crucial role in the decomposition reactions of halogenated pollutants [76,124]. Isotopically labelled alumina (18O) was successfully implemented to prove the suggested reaction pathway and could partly be detected in the oxidized reaction products CO18O and C18O2, respectively. The reaction intermediates and products were analyzed and quantified via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), liquid 19F and 27Al NMR spectroscopy, HPLC MS/MS spectrometry and ion chromatography, respectively.
Most recently, a unprecedented synthetic strategy was published, based on the complementary effects of zero-valent iron (ZVI) and the oxidation agent potassium ferrateVI [128]. Complete degradation and almost quantitative defluorination (95%) was achieved when PFHxS (Figure 1) and the perfluoro methyl acrylate C6SA (Figure 3) were treated in a zirconia-housed planetary ball mill at 600 rpm for four hours. The optimized Fe0:FeVI ratio was found to be 2:1. Known as a potent reagent with a high reduction potential, ferrateVI compounds have been successfully applied in various MC reactions [129,130]. ZVI has been used earlier in reductive defluorination reactions of PFASs before (compare Section 2.4) but serves a different purpose here. Upon the exothermic reaction of ferrateVI with ZVI in the presence of water, H2O2 and Fe2O3 are formed (ΔG = −5913 kJ/mol). Simultaneously, ferrateVI gets reduced by ZVI involving electron transfer reactions and the formation of perferrylV and OH radicals. Both processes can be regarded as key elements in this tribo-assisted oxidation reaction. With regard to the mechanism of the decomposition reaction of PFHxS, the authors propose the homolysis of the relatively weak C−S bond as the favored initiating step, followed by the release of SO3H (see Figure 7). For methacrylate C6SA, an oxygenation reaction by one of the hypervalent iron oxide species leads to formation of an SO3 group at the fluorinated sidechain (not displayed). In the following step, the newly created fluoroalkyl radical can rearrange with an unpaired OH radical to form perfluoro alcohols. The elimination of HF leads to the formation of perfluoro acyl fluorides, which can be oxidized to perfluoro acids with a smaller chain length. Deprotonation and subsequent radical decarboxylation initiate the following reaction cycle, progressing the PFHxS decomposition. As shown by previously reported investigations, CO2, elemental carbon and HF were detected and quantified as the major reaction products.

4. Future Prospect—Applicability in Remediation

Surveying the existing literature concerning PFASs in environmental ambience of the last two decades, it is evident that reported cases of contamination have grown drastically, whereas new insights of PFAS degradation slowly progressed [48]. Both advanced oxidation and reduction defluorination processes (AOP, ARP) have been developed, utilizing different reaction conditions ranging from basic thermal treatments up to sophisticated photooxidation catalysts [62,76]. Their reaction efficiencies vary from low percentage yields to quantitative decomposition and full mineralization. While the majority of the reviewed processes seem both reliable and reproduceable, most of them require extreme reaction conditions. The latter range from high-demanding physical conditions (hydrothermal treatments) [78,80,131], over sensitive reactants and equipment (photochemical treatment) [62,67,90,91,132,133], up to very long reaction times (biological and bio-inorganic catalysis) [83,85,86].
In contrast, on a laboratory scale, the MC defluorination of PFASs is neither extremely energy demanding nor extremely sensitive, does not require extreme heat or pressure and reaction times stay within 1–18 h. Thus, mechanochemistry can be regarded as a pioneering technology in terms of PFAS remediation. Moreover, simple and cost-efficient reagents (CaO, ZVI, KOH, Al2O3, La2O3, Na2FeO4, Na2S2O8, etc.) can be applied, yielding significant decomposition and defluorination ratios [113,118,119,120,127,128]. The process can be easily interrupted for quality control, process monitoring or addition of reagents or additives. Over the period of the last ten years, progress has been made with respect to the mechanistic understanding of tribochemical defluorination reactions. Consequently, reaction conditions and application of reagents (molar ratio, milling conditions, milling times, rotational speed) could be gradually improved. Nonetheless, further research on the isolation of single reaction products is necessary in order to get a profound mechanistic understanding of MC-controlled defluorination reactions. Due to its destructive nature, mechanochemistry allows specific reaction pathways that might not be accessible via other defluorination approaches. Furthermore, mechanochemistry does not require solvent assistance, hence is much more accessible for a wider range of applications. Altogether, mechanochemistry can undoubtedly be regarded as the most sustainable PFAS treatment technology existing.
So far, both reductive and oxidative defluorination reactions were performed under MC treatment. In comparison, more oxidative processes are known, since oxidation agents such as S2O82- are easily accessible and economically feasible. On the other hand, MC oxidative defluorination is more dangerous, since organically bound fluorine gets oxidized to HF, which is a highly toxic and corrosive gas. Only a subsequent base-wash converts HF into harmless mineral fluorides. By performing a reductive defluorination, no toxic HF gets formed since the direct conversion of organic fluorides into metal fluoride salts occur. This might be of greater interest when conceptions for scaling-up MC reactions are made. MC degradation has only been shown for a few selected PFASs on a small scale. With regard to availability as remediation tool, more detailed research is inevitable, especially in terms of the variety of fluorinated compounds, reagents and scalability. Furthermore, no solid information on matrix influences during MC defluorination reactions are available and limitations of milling systems, reaction conditions or efficiency of higher scale MC defluorination reactions are completely unknown.
Cagnetta et al. have summarized the previously attempted applications of ball milling as a means of remediation of POP-contaminated solids [105]. According to their investigation, large-scale ball mills performed their specific remediation tasks and competed well in terms of costs per m3 of contaminated soil (76 USD/m3), compared to state-of-the-art applications like incineration (914–1540 USD/m3) or landfilling (200–340 USD/m3). Nonetheless, reactions were performed on soils containing both organic chlorinated pollutants (PCB, etc.) and inorganic heavy metals (Cr, Pb, Ni, etc.) but no studies on ball milling PFAS-containing solid matrices are known.
If up-scaled decomposition reactions might not work for PFAS-contaminated matrices, MC might contribute in a diverse way. In a different approach, the sorption capacity of chitosan was mechanochemically optimized and successfully applied as a sorbent for PFOS [134]. In the short term, improved PFAS adsorption techniques might be very beneficial since adsorption materials are often affordable and can be utilized quickly [57,65]. In the long term, PFAS sorption applications are not always reliable [135] and since the pollutant is only temporarily fixed, subsequent treatments are still inevitable.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we presented an overview of the state-of-the-art literature on reductive defluorination reactions on PFASs. Several different reaction strategies were introduced, and compared with regard to their reagents, reaction conditions, decomposition and defluorination efficiency. Most of the reported techniques only result in the C-C bond cleavage of PFASs, leading to formation of mostly poisonous short-chain fluorinated compounds. Furthermore, it must be mentioned that false treatment, e.g., thermal treatment, at too-low temperatures in the absence of a hydrogen source leads to an incomplete degradation, usually yielding shorter, more volatile PFASs. So far, complete PFAS decomposition is only enabled by thermal pyrolysis. Besides, the use of planetary ball mills has evolved over the last couple of years as a very promising and most importantly sustainable technology. Exhibiting an enormous reaction potential, mechanochemistry has developed as a competent application of decomposing per- and polyfluorinated POPs. A comprehensive understanding of the involved mechanistic processes can support further progression and improvements of reaction strategies. Since the limitations of existing methods have not been reached, further research and development is required to improve and to reach beyond the current state-of-the-art methods.
As stressed, there are no studies on implementing ball milling as a remediation application of PFAS-contaminated soils, ashes, waste or slags. So far, no scientific reports on the influence of solid matrices and the effects of reductive defluorination reactions during ball milling are known. More effort needs to be invested in optimizing reagents (e.g., appropriate reducing agents), milling conditions, influence of external parameters and milling efficiency. Additionally, the estimated cost calculation for MC degradation of PFASs is unknown but might be comparable to the estimated values of previous halogenated POP treatments. Thus, further testing is required to assure the functionality and reproducibility in larger scale applications.
Finally, the combination of several techniques such as the ball milling of PFAS-contaminated fine fractions concentrated in soil-washing plants or PFAS-loaded adsorption agents might be one example of a sustainable and effective future application of mechanochemistry as a PFAS remediation technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.R. and C.V.; writing—original draft preparation, P.R. and C.V.; writing—review and editing, P.R., C.V. and F.-G.S.; visualization, P.R.; supervision, F.-G.S.; funding acquisition, F.-G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review paper was gratefully funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy BMWi; ZIM program, grant number 16KN076722 “PerFluSan-PFTSan”.

Acknowledgments

We highly acknowledge the numerous discussions with our cooperative partner V. Birke (University of Applied Science Wismar).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Schaider, L.A.; Balan, S.A.; Blum, A.; Andrews, D.Q.; Strynar, M.J.; Dickinson, M.E.; Lunderberg, D.M.; Lang, J.R.; Peaslee, G.F. Fluorinated compounds in U.S. fast food packaging. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2017, 4, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schultes, L.; Peaslee, G.F.; Brockman, J.D.; Majumdar, A.; McGuinness, S.R.; Wilkinson, J.T.; Sandblom, O.; Ngwenyama, R.A.; Benskin, J.P. Total fluorine measurements in food packaging: How do current methods perform? Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Hill, P.J.; Taylor, M.; Goswami, P.; Blackburn, R.S. Substitution of PFAS chemistry in outdoor apparel and the impact on repellency performance. Chemosphere 2017, 181, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kissa, E. Fluorinated Surfactants and Repellents, 2nd ed.; Taylor & Francis: Basel, Switzerland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lehmler, H.J. Synthesis of environmentally relevant fluorinated surfactants—A review. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 1471–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buck, R.C.; Murphy, P.M.; Pabon, M. Chemistry, properties, and uses of commercial fluorinated surfactants. In Polyfluorinated Chemicals and Transformation Products; Knepper, T.P., Lange, F.T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pabon, M.; Corpart, J.M. Fluorinated surfactants: Synthesis, properties, effluent treatment. J. Fluor. Chem. 2002, 114, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mumtaz, M.; Bao, Y.; Liu, L.; Huang, J.; Cagnetta, G.; Yu, G. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in representative fluorocarbon surfactants used in Chinese film-forming foams: Levels, profile shift, and environmental implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Scott, P.J.H.; Campbell, I.B.; Steel, P.G. A general method for the preparation of perfluoroalkanesulfonyl chlorides. J. Fluor. Chem. 2005, 126, 1196–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Posner, S. Perfluorinated compounds: Occurrence and uses in products. In Polyfluorinated Chemicals and Transformation Products; Knepper, T.P., Lange, F.T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 25–39. [Google Scholar]
  11. Siegemund, G.; Schwertfeger, W.; Feiring, A.; Smart, B.; Behr, F.; Vogel, H.; McKusick, B.; Kirsch, P. Fluorine compounds, organic. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirsch, P. Modern Fluoroorganic Chemistry; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Smart, B.E. Fluorine substituent effects (on bioactivity). J. Fluor. Chem. 2001, 109, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jia, X.H.; Luo, Y.Z.; Huang, R.; Bo, H.D.; Liu, Q.Y.; Zhu, X.H. Spreading kinetics of fluorocarbon surfactants on several liquid fuels surfaces. Colloids Surf. A 2020, 589, 124441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koch, A.; Aro, R.; Wang, T.; Yeung, L.W.Y. Towards a comprehensive analytical workflow for the chemical characterisation of organofluorine in consumer products and environmental samples. Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 123, 115423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Giesy, J.P.; Kannan, K. Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1339–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hekster, F.M.; Laane, R.W.P.M.; de Voogt, P. Environmental and toxicity effects of perfluoroalkylated substances. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 99–121. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sunderland, E.M.; Hu, X.C.; Dassuncao, C.; Tokranov, A.K.; Wagner, C.C.; Allen, J.G. A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2019, 29, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Steenland, K.; Fletcher, T.; Savitz, D.A. Epidemiologic evidence on the health effects of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 1100–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kennedy, G.L.; Symons, J.M. Carcinogenicity of perfluoroalkyl compounds. In Toxicological Effects of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances; DeWitt, J.C., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 265–304. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindstrom, A.B.; Strynar, M.J.; Libelo, E.L. Polyfluorinated compounds: Past, present, and future. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 7954–7961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lallas, P.L. The Stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants. Am. J. Int. Law 2017, 95, 692–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ateia, M.; Maroli, A.; Tharayil, N.; Karanfil, T. The overlooked short- and ultrashort-chain poly- and perfluorinated substances: A review. Chemosphere 2019, 220, 866–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Loos, R.; Gawlik, B.M.; Locoro, G.; Rimaviciute, E.; Contini, S.; Bidoglio, G. EU-wide survey of polar organic persistent pollutants in european river waters. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Loos, R.; Locoro, G.; Comero, S.; Contini, S.; Schwesig, D.; Werres, F.; Balsaa, P.; Gans, O.; Weiss, S.; Blaha, L.; et al. Pan-European survey on the occurrence of selected polar organic persistent pollutants in ground water. Water Res. 2010, 44, 4115–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Theobald, N.; Caliebe, C.; Gerwinski, W.; Huhnerfuss, H.; Lepom, P. Occurrence of perfluorinated organic acids in the North and Baltic seas. part 1: Distribution in sea water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2011, 18, 1057–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Theobald, N.; Caliebe, C.; Gerwinski, W.; Huhnerfuss, H.; Lepom, P. Occurrence of perfluorinated organic acids in the North and Baltic Seas. Part 2: Distribution in sediments. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gellrich, V. Sorption und Verbreitung per- und Polyfluorierter Chemikalien (PFAS) in Wasser und Boden. Ph.D. Thesis, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Gießen, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  29. Costanza, J.; Arshadi, M.; Abriola, L.M.; Pennell, K.D. Accumulation of PFOA and PFOS at the air-water interface. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kärrman, A.; Wang, T.; Kallenborn, R.; Langseter, A.M.; Grønhovd, S.M.; Ræder, E.M.; Lyche, J.L.; Yeung, L.; Chen, F.; Eriksson, U.; et al. PFASs in the Nordic Environment Screening of Poly-and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) and Extractable Organic Fluorine (EOF) in the Nordic Environment, 515 ed.; TemaNord; Nordisk Ministerråd: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2019; p. 153. ISSN 0908-6692. [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, S.; Junaid, M.; Zhong, W.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, N. A sensitive method for simultaneous determination of 12 classes of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in groundwater by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 2020, 251, 126327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zareitalabad, P.; Siemens, J.; Hamer, M.; Amelung, W. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in surface waters, sediments, soils and wastewater—A review on concentrations and distribution coefficients. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vierke, L.; Moller, A.; Klitzke, S. Transport of perfluoroalkyl acids in a water-saturated sediment column investigated under near-natural conditions. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 186, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mussabek, D.; Ahrens, L.; Persson, K.M.; Berndtsson, R. Temporal trends and sediment-water partitioning of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in lake sediment. Chemosphere 2019, 227, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Higgins, C.P.; Field, J.A.; Criddle, C.S.; Luthy, R.G. Quantitative determination of perfluorochemicals in sediments and domestic sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3946–3956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yeung, L.W.; De Silva, A.O.; Loi, E.I.; Marvin, C.H.; Taniyasu, S.; Yamashita, N.; Mabury, S.A.; Muir, D.C.; Lam, P.K. Perfluoroalkyl substances and extractable organic fluorine in surface sediments and cores from Lake Ontario. Environ. Int. 2013, 59, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Codling, G.; Vogt, A.; Jones, P.D.; Wang, T.; Wang, P.; Lu, Y.L.; Corcoran, M.; Bonina, S.; Li, A.; Sturchio, N.C.; et al. Historical trends of inorganic and organic fluorine in sediments of Lake Michigan. Chemosphere 2014, 114, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, P.; Wang, T.; Giesy, J.P.; Lu, Y. Perfluorinated compounds in soils from Liaodong Bay with concentrated fluorine industry parks in China. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tan, B.; Wang, T.; Wang, P.; Luo, W.; Lu, Y.; Romesh, K.Y.; Giesy, J.P. Perfluoroalkyl substances in soils around the Nepali Koshi River: Levels, distribution, and mass balance. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 9201–9211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Campos Pereira, H.; Ullberg, M.; Kleja, D.B.; Gustafsson, J.P.; Ahrens, L. Sorption of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) to an organic soil horizon—Effect of cation composition and pH. Chemosphere 2018, 207, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ghisi, R.; Vamerali, T.; Manzetti, S. Accumulation of perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in agricultural plants: A review. Environ. Res. 2019, 169, 326–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, W.; Rhodes, G.; Ge, J.; Yu, X.; Li, H. Uptake and accumulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in plants. Chemosphere 2020, 261, 127584. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Felizeter, S.; Jurling, H.; Kotthoff, M.; De Voogt, P.; McLachlan, M.S. Influence of soil on the uptake of perfluoroalkyl acids by lettuce: A comparison between a hydroponic study and a field study. Chemosphere 2020, 260, 127608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sebastiano, M.; Angelier, F.; Blevin, P.; Ribout, C.; Sagerup, K.; Descamps, S.; Herzke, D.; Moe, B.; Barbraud, C.; Bustnes, J.O.; et al. Exposure to PFAS is associated with telomere length dynamics and demographic responses of an arctic top predator. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 10217–10226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sharp, S.; Sardina, P.; Metzeling, L.; McKenzie, R.; Leahy, P.; Menkhorst, P.; Hinwood, A. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in ducks and the relationship with concentrations in water, sediment, and soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Spaan, K.M.; van Noordenburg, C.; Plassmann, M.M.; Schultes, L.; Shaw, S.; Berger, M.; Heide-Jorgensen, M.P.; Rosing-Asvid, A.; Granquist, S.M.; Dietz, R.; et al. Fluorine mass balance and suspect screening in marine mammals from the northern hemisphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4046–4058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Yamashita, N.; Kannan, K.; Taniyasu, S.; Horii, Y.; Petrick, G.; Gamo, T. A global survey of perfluorinated acids in oceans. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 51, 658–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nakayama, S.F.; Yoshikane, M.; Onoda, Y.; Nishihama, Y.; Iwai-Shimada, M.; Takagi, M.; Kobayashi, Y.; Isobe, T. Worldwide trends in tracing poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment. Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 121, 115410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shoeib, M.; Harner, T.; Vlahos, P. Perfluorinated chemicals in the arctic atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7577–7583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Martin, J.W.; Kannan, K.; Berger, U.; de Voogt, P.; Field, J.; Franklin, J.; Giesy, J.P.; Harner, T.; Muir, D.C.; Scott, B.; et al. Analytical challenges hamper perfluoroalkyl research. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 248A–255A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Skutlarek, D.; Exner, M.; Färber, H. Perfluorierte Tenside (PFT) in der aquatischen Umwelt und im Trinkwasser. Umweltwiss. Schadst. Forsch. 2006, 18, 151–154. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rayne, S.; Forest, K. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonic and carboxylic acids: A critical review of physicochemical properties, levels and patterns in waters and wastewaters, and treatment methods. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2009, 44, 1145–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, P.; Oyang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Tu, T.; Tian, X.; Li, L.; Zhao, Y.; Li, J.; Xiao, Z. Occurrence of perfluorinated compounds in agricultural environment, vegetables, and fruits in regions influenced by a fluorine-chemical industrial park in China. Chemosphere 2019, 225, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kalbe, U.; Bandow, N.; Bredow, A.; Mathies, H.; Piechotta, C. Column leaching tests on soils containing less investigated organic pollutants. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014, 147, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lyu, X.; Liu, X.; Sun, Y.; Ji, R.; Gao, B.; Wu, J. Transport and retention of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in natural soils: Importance of soil organic matter and mineral contents, and solution ionic strength. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2019, 225, 103477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, P.; Zhi, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, H.; Li, Z.; Peng, Y.; He, Y.; Luo, L.; Rong, X.; Zhou, Y. Research progress on the removal of hazardous perfluorochemicals: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 250, 109488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mahinroosta, R.; Senevirathna, L. A review of the emerging treatment technologies for PFAS contaminated soils. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 255, 109896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. O’Hagan, D. Understanding organofluorine chemistry. An introduction to the C-F bond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Y.; Moores, A.; Liu, J.; Ghoshal, S. New insights into the degradation mechanism of perfluorooctanoic acid by persulfate from density functional theory and experimental data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 8672–8681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khan, M.Y.; So, S.; da Silva, G. Decomposition kinetics of perfluorinated sulfonic acids. Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lyu, X.; Liu, X.; Wu, X.; Sun, Y.; Gao, B.; Wu, J. Importance of Al/Fe oxyhydroxide coating and ionic strength in perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) transport in saturated porous media. Water Res. 2020, 175, 115685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Trojanowicz, M.; Bojanowska-Czajka, A.; Bartosiewicz, I.; Kulisa, K. Advanced oxidation/reduction processes treatment for aqueous perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS)—A review of recent advances. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 170–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nzeribe, N.; Crimi, M.; Thagard, S.M.; Holsen, T.M. Physico-chemical processes for the treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A review blossom. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 49, 866–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, L.; He, L.; Xue, J.; Ma, Y.; Xie, Z.; Wu, L.; Huang, M.; Zhang, Z. Persulfate-based degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in aqueous solution: Review on influences, mechanisms and prospective. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 393, 122405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ross, I.; McDonough, J.; Miles, J.; Storch, P.; Thelakkat, K.P.; Kalve, E.; Hurst, J.; Dasgupta, S.S.; Burdick, J. A review of emerging technologies for remediation of PFASs. Remediat. J. 2018, 28, 101–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Qu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, F.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Q. Photo-reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid in water. Water Res. 2010, 44, 2939–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Song, Z.; Tang, H.; Wang, N.; Zhu, L. Reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid by hydrated electrons in a sulfite-mediated UV photochemical system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tian, H.; Gao, J.; Li, H.; Boyd, S.A.; Gu, C. Complete defluorination of perfluorinated compounds by hydrated electrons generated from 3-indole-acetic-acid in organomodified montmorillonite. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bao, Y.; Huang, J.; Cagnetta, G.; Yu, G. Removal of F-53B as PFOS alternative in chrome plating wastewater by UV/sulfite reduction. Water Res. 2019, 163, 114907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bentel, M.J.; Yu, Y.; Xu, L.; Li, Z.; Wong, B.M.; Men, Y.; Liu, J. Defluorination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) with hydrated electrons: Structural dependence and implications to PFAS remediation and management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 3718–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Trojanowicz, M.; Bartosiewicz, I.; Bojanowska-Czajka, A.; Kulisa, K.; Szreder, T.; Bobrowski, K.; Nichipor, H.; Garcia-Reyes, J.F.; Nalecz-Jawecki, G.; Meczynska-Wielgosz, S.; et al. Application of ionizing radiation in decomposition of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in waters. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 357, 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Su, Y.; Rao, U.; Khor, C.M.; Jensen, M.G.; Teesch, L.M.; Wong, B.M.; Cwiertny, D.M.; Jassby, D. Potential-driven electron transfer lowers the dissociation energy of the C-F bond and facilitates reductive defluorination of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 33913–33922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bentel, M.J.; Yu, Y.; Xu, L.; Kwon, H.; Li, Z.; Wong, B.M.; Men, Y.; Liu, J. Degradation of perfluoroalkyl ether carboxylic acids with hydrated electrons: Structure-reactivity relationships and environmental implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 2489–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Chen, Z.; Li, C.; Gao, J.; Dong, H.; Chen, Y.; Wu, B.; Gu, C. Efficient reductive destruction of perfluoroalkyl substances under self-assembled micelle confinement. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 5178–5185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bentel, M.J.; Liu, Z.K.; Yu, Y.C.; Gao, J.Y.; Men, Y.J.; Liu, J.Y. Enhanced degradation of perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) by UV/sulfite treatment: Reaction mechanisms and system efficiencies at pH 12. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cui, J.; Gao, P.; Deng, Y. Destruction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with advanced reduction processes (ARPs): A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 3752–3766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xiao, F.; Sasi, P.C.; Yao, B.; Kubatova, A.; Golovko, S.A.; Golovko, M.Y.; Soli, D. Thermal stability and decomposition of perfluoroalkyl substances on spent granular activated carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sorengard, M.; Lindh, A.S.; Ahrens, L. Thermal desorption as a high removal remediation technique for soils contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yu, J.; Nickerson, A.; Li, Y.L.; Fang, Y.D.; Strathmann, T.J. Fate of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) during hydrothermal liquefaction of municipal wastewater treatment sludge. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020, 6, 1388–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wu, B.R.; Hao, S.L.; Choi, Y.J.; Higgins, C.P.; Deeb, R.; Strathmann, T.J. Rapid destruction and defluorination of perfluorooctanesulfonate by alkaline hydrothermal reaction. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, F.; Lu, X.; Li, X.Y.; Shih, K. Effectiveness and mechanisms of defluorination of perfluorinated alkyl substances by calcium compounds during waste thermal treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 5672–5680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Parsons, J.R.; Sáez, M.; Dolfing, J.; de Voogt, P. Biodegradation of perfluorinated compounds. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Whitacre, D.M., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; Volume 196, pp. 53–71. [Google Scholar]
  83. Liu, J.; Mejia Avendano, S. Microbial degradation of polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the environment: A review. Environ. Int. 2013, 61, 98–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hamid, H.; Li, L.Y.; Grace, J.R. Formation of perfluorocarboxylic acids from 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTS) in landfill leachate: Role of microbial communities. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sun, M.; Cui, J.N.; Guo, J.Y.; Zhai, Z.H.; Zuo, P.; Zhang, J.B. Fluorochemicals biodegradation as a potential source of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to the environment. Chemosphere 2020, 254, 126894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Luo, Q.; Liang, S.; Huang, Q. Laccase induced degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid in a soil slurry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 359, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sun, Q.B.; Zhao, C.Y.; Frankcombe, T.J.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y. Heterogeneous photocatalytic decomposition of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 523–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gu, Y.; Dong, W.; Luo, C.; Liu, T. Efficient reductive decomposition of perfluorooctanesulfonate in a high photon flux UV/sulfite system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 10554–10561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bao, Y.; Deng, S.; Jiang, X.; Qu, Y.; He, Y.; Liu, L.; Chai, Q.; Mumtaz, M.; Huang, J.; Cagnetta, G.; et al. Degradation of PFOA substitute: GenX (HFPO-DA ammonium salt): Oxidation with UV/persulfate or reduction with UV/sulfite? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 11728–11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tenorio, R.; Liu, J.; Xiao, X.; Maizel, A.; Higgins, C.P.; Schaefer, C.E.; Strathmann, T.J. Destruction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) with UV-sulfite photoreductive treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 6957–6967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tang, H.Q.; Xiang, Q.Q.; Lei, M.; Yan, J.C.; Zhu, L.H.; Zou, J. Efficient degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid by UV-Fenton process. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 184, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hori, H.; Hayakawa, E.; Einaga, H.; Kutsuna, S.; Koike, K.; Ibusuki, T.; Kiatagawa, H.; Arakawa, R. Decomposition of environmentally persistent perfluorooctanoic acid in water by photochemical approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6118–6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhao, B.; Zhang, P. Photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid with β-Ga2O3 wide bandgap photocatalyst. Catal. Commun. 2009, 10, 1184–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhao, B.; Lv, M.; Zhou, L. Photocatalytic degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid with beta-Ga2O3 in anoxic aqueous solution. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 774–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sahu, S.P.; Qanbarzadeh, M.; Ateia, M.; Torkzadeh, H.; Maroli, A.S.; Cates, E.L. Rapid degradation and mineralization of perfluorooctanoic acid by a new petitjeanite Bi3O(OH)(PO4)2 microparticle ultraviolet photocatalyst. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018, 5, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, Y.; Zhang, P. Photocatalytic decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by TiO2 in the presence of oxalic acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 1869–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hori, H.; Nagaoka, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Sano, T.; Yamashita, N.; Taniyasu, S.; Kutsuna, S.; Osaka, I.; Arakawa, R. Efficient decomposition of environmentally persistent perfluorooctanesulfonate and related fluorochemicals using zerovalent iron in subcritical water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 1049–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ochoa-Herrera, V.; Sierra-Alvarez, R.; Somogyi, A.; Jacobsen, N.E.; Wysocki, V.H.; Field, J.A. Reductive defluorination of perfluorooctane sulfonate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 3260–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lee, Y.C.; Chen, Y.P.; Chen, M.J.; Kuo, J.; Lo, S.L. Reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid by titanium (III) citrate with vitamin B12 and copper nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 340, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, J.Y.; Van Hoomissen, D.J.; Liu, T.C.; Maizel, A.; Huo, X.C.; Fernandez, S.R.; Ren, C.X.; Xiao, X.; Fang, Y.D.; Schaefer, C.E.; et al. Reductive defluorination of branched per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances with cobalt complex catalysts. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018, 5, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zenobio, J.E.; Modiri-Gharehveran, M.; de Perre, C.; Vecitis, C.D.; Lee, L.S. Reductive transformation of perfluorooctanesulfonate by nNiFe(0)-activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 397, 122782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Liu, Y.; Ptacek, C.J.; Baldwin, R.J.; Cooper, J.M.; Blowes, D.W. Application of zero-valent iron coupled with biochar for removal of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic and sulfonic acids from water under ambient environmental conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 719, 137372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Birke, V.; Mattik, J.; Runne, D. Mechanochemical reductive dehalogenation of hazardous polyhalogenated contaminants. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 5111–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cagnetta, G.; Robertson, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, K.; Yu, G. Mechanochemical destruction of halogenated organic pollutants: A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 313, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Cagnetta, G.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. A mini-review on mechanochemical treatment of contaminated soil: From laboratory to large-scale. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 48, 723–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tipikin, D.S.; Lebedev, Y.S.; Poluektov, O.G.; Schmidt, J. ESE-detected EPR of triplet radical pairs produced by mechano-chemical treatment of 2,6-di-t-butylquinone diazide mixed with 3,5-di-t-butylpyrocathechon. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 215, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chemerisov, S.D.; Grinberg, O.Y.; Tipikin, D.S.; Lebedev, Y.S.; Kurreck, H.; Mobius, K. Mechanically induced radical pair formation in porphyrin quinone and related donor-acceptor mixtures—Unusual stability and zero-field splittings. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 218, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tipikin, D.S.; Lebedev, Y.S.; Rieker, A. Mechanochemical generation of stable radical species. Oxidation of pyrocatechols. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 272, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, Q.W.; Lu, J.F.; Saito, F.; Baron, M. Mechanochemical solid-phase reaction between polyvinylidene fluoride and sodium hydroxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 81, 2249–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, J.R.; Zhang, Q.W.; Saito, F. Mechanochemical synthesis of lanthanum oxyfluoride by grinding lanthanum oxide with poly (vinylidene fluoride). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 4785–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lee, J.; Zhang, Q.W.; Saito, F. Synthesis of nano-sized lanthanum oxyfluoride powders by mechanochemical processing. J. Alloy. Compd. 2003, 348, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Qu, J.; He, X.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.; Saito, F. Decomposition pathways of polytetrafluoroethylene by co-grinding with strontium/calcium oxides. Environ. Technol. 2017, 38, 1421–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Shintani, M.; Naito, Y.; Yamada, S.; Nomura, Y.; Zhou, S.; Nakashimada, Y.; Hosomi, M. Degradation of perfluorooctansulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by mechanochemical treatment. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 2008, 34, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, K.; Huang, J.; Yu, G.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, S.; Wang, B. Destruction of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by ball milling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 6471–6477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wang, S.; Huang, J.; Yang, Y.; Hui, Y.; Ge, Y.; Larssen, T.; Yu, G.; Deng, S.; Wang, B.; Harman, C. First report of a chinese PFOS alternative overlooked for 30 years: Its toxicity, persistence, and presence in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 10163–10170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, K.L.; Cao, Z.G.; Huang, J.; Deng, S.B.; Wang, B.; Yu, G. Mechanochemical destruction of chinese PFOS alternative F-53B. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 286, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, N.; Liu, J.; Buck, R.C.; Korzeniowski, S.H.; Wolstenholme, B.W.; Folsom, P.W.; Sulecki, L.M. 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate aerobic biotransformation in activated sludge of waste water treatment plants. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 853–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lu, M.; Cagnetta, G.; Zhang, K.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. Mechanochemical mineralization of “very persistent” fluorocarbon surfactants 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2FTS) as an example. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Cagnetta, G.; Zhang, Q.W.; Huang, J.; Lu, M.N.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.J.; Deng, S.B.; Yu, G. Mechanochemical destruction of perfluorinated pollutants and mechanosynthesis of lanthanum oxyfluoride: A waste-to-materials process. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 316, 1078–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lv, H.Q.; Wang, N.; Zhu, L.H.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Li, W.J.; Tang, H.Q. Alumina-mediated mechanochemical method for simultaneously degrading perfluorooctanoic acid and synthesizing a polyfluoroalkene. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 2526–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Biswas, S.; Pramanik, A.; Sarkar, P. Computational studies on the reactivity of alkyl halides over (Al2O3) n nanoclusters: An approach towards room temperature dehydrohalogenation. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 10205–10218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Onodera, T.; Kawasaki, K.; Nakakawaji, T.; Higuchi, Y.; Ozawa, N.; Kurihara, K.; Kubo, M. Tribocatalytic reaction of polytetrafluoroethylene sliding on an aluminum surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 15954–15962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ul’yanov, A.V.; Tataurova, O.G.; Popov, D.A.; Toporov, Y.P.; Malkin, A.I.; Buryak, A.K. Study of the products of the mechanochemical activation of teflon in a mixture with metals by chromatography-mass spectrometry and thermodesorption mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Chem. 2019, 74, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dombrowski, P.M.; Kakarla, P.; Caldicott, W.; Chin, Y.; Sadeghi, V.; Bogdan, D.; Barajas-Rodriguez, F.; Chiang, S.-Y. Technology review and evaluation of different chemical oxidation conditions on treatability of PFAS. Remediat. J. 2018, 28, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhou, Z.; Liu, X.T.; Sun, K.; Lin, C.Y.; Ma, J.; He, M.C.; Ouyang, W. Persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for organic-contaminated soil remediation: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 836–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yan, X.; Liu, X.T.; Qi, C.D.; Wang, D.L.; Lin, C.Y. Mechanochemical destruction of a chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonate (F-53B, a PFOS alternative) assisted by sodium persulfate. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 85785–85790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, N.; Lv, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, L.; Hu, Y.; Majima, T.; Tang, H. Complete defluorination and mineralization of perfluorooctanoic acid by a mechanochemical method using alumina and persulfate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 8302–8313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Deng, S.; Bao, Y.; Cagnetta, G.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. Mechanochemical degradation of perfluorohexane sulfonate: Synergistic effect of ferrate (VI) and zero-valent iron. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 264, 114789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhang, Z.Y.; Ji, D.; Mao, W.; Cui, Y.; Wang, Q.; Han, L.; Zhong, H.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, Y. Norgaard, K.; et al. Dry chemistry of ferrate (VI): A solvent-free mechanochemical way for versatile green oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10949–10953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhao, J.F.; Liu, Y.Q.; Wang, Q.; Fu, Y.S.; Lu, X.H.; Bai, X.F. The self-catalysis of ferrate (VI) by its reactive byproducts or reductive substances for the degradation of diclofenac: Kinetics, mechanism and transformation products. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 192, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Blotevogel, J.; Giraud, R.J.; Borch, T. Reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid by zero-valent iron and zinc: A DFT-based kinetic model. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sansotera, M.; Persico, F.; Pirola, C.; Navarrini, W.; Di Michele, A.; Bianchi, C.L. Decomposition of perfluorooctanoic acid photocatalyzed by titanium dioxide: Chemical modification of the catalyst surface induced by fluoride ions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 148, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Duan, L.; Wang, B.; Heck, K.; Guo, S.; Clark, C.A.; Arredondo, J.; Wang, M.; Senftle, T.P.; Westerhoff, P.; Wen, X.; et al. Efficient photocatalytic PFOA degradation over boron nitride. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Qiu, W.; Vakili, M.; Cagnetta, G.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. Effect of high energy ball milling on organic pollutant adsorption properties of chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 148, 543–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Li, Y.; Oliver, D.P.; Kookana, R.S. A critical analysis of published data to discern the role of soil and sediment properties in determining sorption of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 628, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Left: schematic overview of synthetic production of per- and polyfluoroalkyl surfactants [6]. Right: highlighted amphoteric properties of linear perfluorinated surfactants; molecular structure of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA); perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) and perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA).
Figure 1. Left: schematic overview of synthetic production of per- and polyfluoroalkyl surfactants [6]. Right: highlighted amphoteric properties of linear perfluorinated surfactants; molecular structure of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA); perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) and perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA).
Ijerph 17 07242 g001
Figure 2. Proposed mechanism of reaction of KOH with PFOS and PFOA under mechanochemical treatment [114].
Figure 2. Proposed mechanism of reaction of KOH with PFOS and PFOA under mechanochemical treatment [114].
Ijerph 17 07242 g002
Figure 3. Overview of selected PFASs derivatives activated in tribochemical reactions. First row left: chemical structure of monosubstituted 2-[(6-chloro-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6-dodecafluorohexyl)oxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluorethane sulfonate potassium salt know as F-53B. First row right: chemical structure of 2-[(1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-tridecafluorohexyl)oxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane sulfonate potassium salt, abbreviated as F-53. Second row left: chemical structure of 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctanesulfonate potassium salt, short 6:2-FTS. Second row right: chemical structure of N-ethylperfluorooctane-1-sulfonamide (PFOS amide). Third row left: Structure of perfluorobutyl sulfonate potassium salt (PFBS). Third row right: chemical structure of p-perfluorous nonenoxybenzene sulfonate sodium salt (OBS). Bottom: chemical structure of 2-[2-(perfluorohexyl)]-sulfonylmethylaminoethyl acrylate, C6SA.
Figure 3. Overview of selected PFASs derivatives activated in tribochemical reactions. First row left: chemical structure of monosubstituted 2-[(6-chloro-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6-dodecafluorohexyl)oxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluorethane sulfonate potassium salt know as F-53B. First row right: chemical structure of 2-[(1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-tridecafluorohexyl)oxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane sulfonate potassium salt, abbreviated as F-53. Second row left: chemical structure of 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctanesulfonate potassium salt, short 6:2-FTS. Second row right: chemical structure of N-ethylperfluorooctane-1-sulfonamide (PFOS amide). Third row left: Structure of perfluorobutyl sulfonate potassium salt (PFBS). Third row right: chemical structure of p-perfluorous nonenoxybenzene sulfonate sodium salt (OBS). Bottom: chemical structure of 2-[2-(perfluorohexyl)]-sulfonylmethylaminoethyl acrylate, C6SA.
Ijerph 17 07242 g003
Figure 4. Proposed mechanistic pathways for the stoichiometrical activation of selected PFASs with La2O3 (reprint from [119], with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 4. Proposed mechanistic pathways for the stoichiometrical activation of selected PFASs with La2O3 (reprint from [119], with permission from Elsevier).
Ijerph 17 07242 g004
Figure 5. Proposed mechanistic steps for the alumina-mediated activation of PFOA (reproduced from [120] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Figure 5. Proposed mechanistic steps for the alumina-mediated activation of PFOA (reproduced from [120] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry).
Ijerph 17 07242 g005
Figure 6. Proposed representation of synergetic influences of sodium persulfate (PS) and alumina during mechanochemical activation of PFOA (reprinted with permission from [127], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Figure 6. Proposed representation of synergetic influences of sodium persulfate (PS) and alumina during mechanochemical activation of PFOA (reprinted with permission from [127], copyright 2019 American Chemical Society).
Ijerph 17 07242 g006
Figure 7. Decomposition of PFHxS via mechanochemical reaction with ferrateVI and zero-valent iron (ZVI), proposed by [128].
Figure 7. Decomposition of PFHxS via mechanochemical reaction with ferrateVI and zero-valent iron (ZVI), proposed by [128].
Ijerph 17 07242 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roesch, P.; Vogel, C.; Simon, F.-G. Reductive Defluorination and Mechanochemical Decomposition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): From Present Knowledge to Future Remediation Concepts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197242

AMA Style

Roesch P, Vogel C, Simon F-G. Reductive Defluorination and Mechanochemical Decomposition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): From Present Knowledge to Future Remediation Concepts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(19):7242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197242

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roesch, Philipp, Christian Vogel, and Franz-Georg Simon. 2020. "Reductive Defluorination and Mechanochemical Decomposition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): From Present Knowledge to Future Remediation Concepts" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 19: 7242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197242

APA Style

Roesch, P., Vogel, C., & Simon, F. -G. (2020). Reductive Defluorination and Mechanochemical Decomposition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): From Present Knowledge to Future Remediation Concepts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197242

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop