Buonocore, J.J.; Casey, J.A.; Croy, R.; Spengler, J.D.; McKenzie, L.
Air Monitoring Stations Far Removed From Drilling Activities Do Not Represent Residential Exposures to Marcellus Shale Air Pollutants. Response to the Paper by Hess et al. on Proximity-Based Unconventional Natural Gas Exposure Metrics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 504.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020504
AMA Style
Buonocore JJ, Casey JA, Croy R, Spengler JD, McKenzie L.
Air Monitoring Stations Far Removed From Drilling Activities Do Not Represent Residential Exposures to Marcellus Shale Air Pollutants. Response to the Paper by Hess et al. on Proximity-Based Unconventional Natural Gas Exposure Metrics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(2):504.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020504
Chicago/Turabian Style
Buonocore, Jonathan J., Joan A. Casey, Rachel Croy, John D. Spengler, and Lisa McKenzie.
2020. "Air Monitoring Stations Far Removed From Drilling Activities Do Not Represent Residential Exposures to Marcellus Shale Air Pollutants. Response to the Paper by Hess et al. on Proximity-Based Unconventional Natural Gas Exposure Metrics" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 2: 504.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020504
APA Style
Buonocore, J. J., Casey, J. A., Croy, R., Spengler, J. D., & McKenzie, L.
(2020). Air Monitoring Stations Far Removed From Drilling Activities Do Not Represent Residential Exposures to Marcellus Shale Air Pollutants. Response to the Paper by Hess et al. on Proximity-Based Unconventional Natural Gas Exposure Metrics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 504.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020504