Next Article in Journal
Burnout Syndrome Risk in Child and Adolescent Tennis Players and The Role of Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet
Previous Article in Journal
Assess the Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of LACE and HOSPITAL Re-Admission Prediction Models as a Risk Management Tool for Home Care Patients: An Evaluation Study of a Medical Center Affiliated Home Care Unit in Taiwan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects and Mechanisms of Calcium Ion Addition on Lead Removal from Water by Eichhornia crassipes

1
Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China
2
Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
3
Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky Desertification, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guilin 541004, China
4
Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guilin 541004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(3), 928; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030928
Submission received: 12 December 2019 / Revised: 26 January 2020 / Accepted: 29 January 2020 / Published: 2 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Remediation and Management)

Abstract

:
Karst water is rich in calcium ions (Ca2+) and exhibits poor metal availability and low biodegradation efficiency. This study sought to analyze the effects and mechanisms of Ca2+ on lead (Pb) removal and absorption by Eichhornia crassipes (a floating plant common in karst areas). Moreover, the morphology and functional groups of E. crassipes in water were characterized via SEM, and FTIR. The results demonstrated that the removal rate of Pb in karst water (85.31%) was higher than that in non-karst water (77.04%); however, the Pb bioconcentration amount (BCA) in E. crassipes roots in karst water (1763 mg/kg) was lower than that in non-karst water (2143 mg/kg). With increased Ca2+ concentrations (60, 80, and 100 mg/L) in karst water, the Pb removal rate increased (85.31%, 88.87%, and 92.44%), the Pb BCA decreased (1763, 1317, and 1095 mg/kg), and the Ca BCA increased (6801, 6955, and 9368 mg/kg), which was attributed to PbCO3 and PbSO4 precipitation and competitive Ca and Pb absorption. High Ca2+ concentrations increased the strength of cation exchange, alleviated the fracture degree of fibrous roots, reduced the atrophy of vascular bundles, protected the cell wall, promoted C–O combined with Pb, enhanced the strength of O‒H, SO42−, C=O, and reduced the oxidization of alkynyl acetylene bonds.

1. Introduction

Karst water quality has begun to deteriorate in recent years due to increased industrial mining, agriculture, and other human activities. The “three wastes” generated by industrial and mining enterprises, municipal sewage discharge, and the use of heavy-metal-containing products have caused serious heavy metal environmental pollution [1]. Karst areas in China are mainly distributed in the southwestern region and are characterized by complex landforms and carbonate formations. Karst areas possess abundant groundwater resources, which are alkaline and rich in calcium ions (Ca2+) and exhibit poor metal availability and low biodegradation efficiency. Notably, karst water is characteristically rich in HCO3-Ca due to the dissolution of carbonate rocks [2]. Moreover, due to its unique hydrologic double-layer structure (i.e., surface and underground water), karst water is easily polluted but difficult to treat once it has been contaminated by heavy metals [3]. Heavy metal pollution in karst water has become an urgent, worldwide problem. Lead (Pb) is one of the most toxic heavy metal elements and has very long retention times, which is why it has become one of the most studied elements in the field of heavy metal pollution [4]. Aquatic Pb pollution mainly originates from industrial wastewater discharged by the lead smelting industry. Pb remains and accumulates in the food chain after entering the environment, which causes serious toxicity to organisms. Moreover, Pb affects plant photosynthesis and transpiration capacity [5,6]; therefore, Pb remediation has become the focus of many studies worldwide.
Eichhornia crassipes is an aquatic floating plant that is widely distributed all over the world and occurs in large quantities in karst areas in China. E. crassipes has broad, thick, glossy, ovate leaves and stems, which are important for photosynthesis, food production, gas exchange, and water transpiration [7]. This plant is known to adapt to a wide variety of environmental conditions and even grows well in sewage water. Importantly, E. crassipes possesses a high heavy metal tolerance and uptake efficiency and has therefore become popular for water phytoremediation [8]. E. crassipes can reproduce quickly and absorb various pollutants [9]. Suryandari et al. [10] also demonstrated Pb removal efficiencies of up to 99.71% in E. crassipes harvested after nine days.
Calcium (Ca) is an essential element for plants; it is an important regulator of plant growth and supports the structure and stability of cell walls, membranes, and membrane-binding proteins. Ca is also a second messenger that regulates the response of plants to environmental changes [11]. Moreover, certain Ca2+ concentrations could promote growth and development, metabolism, cell structure, and adaptability to heavy metal stress [12,13,14]. Ca2+ could also inhibit the transport of heavy metals from underground to aboveground plant structures [15]. Increased Ca2+ concentrations could reduce heavy metal solubility [16] and alleviate heavy metal phytotoxicity [17]. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the effects of Ca2+ on heavy metal accumulation in plants. Heeraman et al. [18] reported that high Ca2+ concentrations could promote the accumulation of arsenic in Zorro fescue (a grass species). In contrast, Calile et al. [16] demonstrated that Ca2+ had no apparent effect on the absorption of arsenic in the Chinese brake (Pteris vittata). Regardless of these discrepancies, high Ca2+ concentrations in karst water may be responsible for the higher heavy metal bioaccumulation capacity of some aquatic plants in karst waters than that in other environments [19]. However, the effects of Ca2+ on the Pb removal and accumulation capacity of E. crassipes in Pb-contaminated karst water remain unclear.
Therefore, this study sought to characterize the effect of Ca2+ on the Pb removal efficiency of E. crassipes in karst water. This study employed Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometry (FTIR), and other methods to investigate the Pb removal efficiency and absorption capacity of E. crassipes in karst and non-karst water at different Ca2+ concentrations. This study thus provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms by which Ca2+ modulates Pb uptake by E. crassipes in karst water under Pb-induced stress, and provides a theoretical basis for the effective application of E. crassipes for Pb remediation in polluted karst water.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Similarly sized wild E. crassipes plants were collected from the Huixian wetland (Guilin, Guangxi, China), where these plants are abundant and widely distributed. After discarding decomposed leaves, the surface dirt on the remaining leaves was removed by repeatedly washing them with tap water and then with de-ionized water. The E. crassipes plants used herein had the following characteristics: weight, 150 g; height, 30 cm; Ca, 13,275 mg/kg; Mg, 2325 mg/kg; K, 28,950 mg/kg; Na, 1198 mg/kg; P, 2695 mg/kg; Fe, 2570 mg/kg; Mn, 598 mg/kg; Pb, 2.46 mg/kg; Cd, 0.118 mg/kg; Cu, 16.5 mg/kg; Zn, 53.6 mg/kg.
The karst and non-karst water used in the experiments were obtained from the outlets of the Mamian Shizishan underground river at Huixian and the Lijiang River in Guilin, respectively, using polyethylene barrels. Table 1 summarizes the karst and non-karst water hydrochemical parameters determined by this study. All chemicals used for experimental purposes were of analytical grade and were dissolved in de-ionized water.

2.2. Methods

All experiments were conducted in controllable greenhouses at the Huixian Karst Wetland Ecological Base (Guilin, Guangxi, China). Eight liters of experimental water and 150 g of similarly sized E. crassipes plants with a 1:3 root to stem/leaf mass ratio were placed into individual polyethylene vessels and cultivated at 25 ± 3 ℃ under natural light conditions for 24 days. The experiments were performed in triplicate with the inclusion of a control group. Deionized water was added to each experimental vessel regularly to compensate for water absorption and transpiration and keep the overall water volume constant. Figure 1 illustrates the experimental setup and Table 2 summarizes the experimental parameters. The initial Pb concentration in the experimental water was adjusted to 0.5 mg/L. The Pb concentration was adjusted by adding an appropriate amount of Pb(NO3)2 to the experimental water. The Ca2+ concentrations in karst and non-karst water were adjusted to 60, 80, and 100 mg/L, and 20 and 60 mg/L, respectively. Ca2+ concentrations were adjusted by adding appropriate amounts of analytical grade CaCl2 to the experimental water. The compounds were allowed to fully dissolve before being added to the experimental vessels.
Pb concentrations in water and elemental composition of E. crassipes were determined, and SEM and FTIR analyses of E. crassipes were conducted in this study. The Pb concentrations in water were tested every eight days. Polyethylene (PE) bottles were soaked in 10% HNO3 for 24 h and washed three times with both deionized and the experimental water before collecting the water samples. The water samples were filtered through a 0.45-µm micropore membrane filter, after which the filtrate was transferred to 50-mL PE bottles. HNO3 was then added to reduce the water pH to <2. The PE bottles were then sealed with paraffin wax and stored in a 4 °C refrigerator keeping the samples from direct light contact. The Pb concentrations in the water samples were determined via ICP-MS (iCAP Q, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, [MA], USA) according to the GB/T 5750.6-2006. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the measured values of each index in the water sample was below 5.0% and the standard recovery was 80–120%. After the experimental treatment, E. crassipes was removed from the experimental vessel, rinsed with tap water, and allowed to dry, after which the roots, stems, and leaves were separated. The wet and dry weights of the samples were then measured. The elemental composition of roots, stems, and leaves were detected via ICP-MS according to the GB5009.268-2016. The detection limits of Ca, Mg, Na, K, P, Fe, Mn, Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn were 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 0.10, 0.02, 0.002, 0.05, and 0.50 mg/kg, respectively. The fresh roots, stems, and leaves were freeze-dried via one-step tert-butanol freeze-drying. The dried samples were sprayed with gold and the morphology of the samples was assessed via SEM (JEM-6490 LV, JEOL) at a 20 kV accelerating voltage. The functional groups involved in the process of Pb absorption by E. crassipes were characterized via FTIR (Spectrum TWO, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, [MA], USA) using the KBr tablet method; 1.00 mg of sample and 200.00 mg of crushed KBr crystals were added to an agate mortar and fully ground. The mixtures were then transferred to a mold to prepare uniform and transparent ingots using a tablet press. Three ingots were prepared for each processed sample.

2.3. Data Processing

The experimental data were analyzed using the Origin 9 (OriginLab, Northampton, [MA], USA) Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, [WA], USA) software, and the experimental values were expressed as the mean(s) ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3) of three replicate experiments. The data normality was first verified; descriptive statistics and data exploration were performed using the SPSS 19 software (IBM, Armonk, [NY], USA). The data were considered to be normally distributed at a p-value ≥ 0.05. Afterward, variance homogeneity was verified, and mean comparisons, one-way ANOVA, and variance homogeneity were determined using SPSS 19. The variance was deemed homogeneous at a p-value > 0.05. One-way ANOVA coupled with the Tukey test was performed using SPSS 19 to identify significant differences between treatments. The statistical significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.
The results obtained in the experiments were used to determine the following parameters:
Removal rate (%): q = (C0-C)/C0×100%;
Bioconcentration amount (BCA): BC = CP-CP0;
Bioconcentration factor (BCF): BCF = CP/CS;
Translocation factor (TF): TF = CSL/CR,
Where C0 is the concentration of Pb in water before the experiment (mg/L); C is the concentration of Pb in water during the experiment (mg/L); CP is the Pb content in a given E. crassipes structure (mg/kg); CP0 is the initial Pb content in a given E. crassipes structure (mg/kg); CS is the concentration of Pb in water after the experiment (mg/kg); CSL is the content of Pb in stems and leaves (mg/kg); CR is the Pb content in roots (mg/kg).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Ca2+ Concentration on Pb Removal from Water

As shown in Figure 2, the E. crassipes Pb removal rate in water varied as a function of Ca2+ concentration. The Pb removal rate in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+ (85.31%) was higher than that of non-karst water with 20 mg/L Ca2+ (77.04%). The Pb removal rate was 85.31%, 88.87%, and 92.44% in karst water with 60, 80, and 100 mg/L Ca2+, respectively. In non-karst water with 20 and 60 mg/L Ca2+, the Pb removal rate was 77.04% and 85.24%, respectively. The significant difference between the Pb removal rate in water with different Ca2+ concentrations was tested using SPSS 19. The p-value between groups was 0.004 (i.e., < 0.01), indicating that the difference between the removal rates of Pb in water with different Ca2+ concentrations was very significant. This study found that the Pb removal rate increased with higher Ca2+ concentrations in both karst and non-karst water, and therefore we concluded that high Ca2+ concentrations facilitate Pb removal from water by E. crassipes. Calile et al. [16] demonstrated that an increased Ca2+ concentration could reduce the solubility of heavy metals in water. Yin et al. [20] analyzed the effect of liming (91% calcium carbonate) on Pb weathering in sand berms and found that the total Pb concentrations in the limed plots were lower than those in the plots without lime. Yang et al. [21] demonstrated that CaCl2 greatly enhanced the Pb removal rate from blast furnace dust, which was consistent with present results. Nonetheless, Pb removal rates at a 60 mg/L Ca2+ concentration were only slightly lower in non-karst water (85.24%) than in karst water (85.31%). It can be speculated that other hydrochemical differences (i.e., in addition to Ca2+) between karst and non-karst water may modulate Pb removal by E. crassipes, such as HCO3 concentration, as proposed by Zhang et al. [19]. Therefore, the effects of HCO3 on Pb removal from karst water by E. crassipes should be analyzed in further studies.

3.2. Effect of Ca2+ Concentration on Pb Absorption in E. crassipes

The effect of Ca2+ concentration on the elemental composition of different E. crassipes structures before and after Pb absorption were tested by ICP-MS (Table 3). The Pb bioconcentration amount (BCA), bioconcentration factor (BCF), and translocation factor (TF) were then calculated (Table 4). Significant differences between the Pb BCA in E. crassipes in water with different Ca2+ concentrations were identified with the SPSS 19 software. The p-value was 0.001 (< 0.01), indicating that the difference between the Pb BCAs was very significant. The Pb BCA in E. crassipes roots in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+ (1763 mg/kg) was lower than that in non-karst water with 20 mg/L Ca2+ (2143 mg/kg). The Pb BCA in E. crassipes roots in karst water with 60, 80, and 100 mg/L Ca2+ were 1763, 1317, and 1095 mg/kg, respectively. Furthermore, in non-karst water with 20 and 60 mg/L of Ca2+, the Pb BCA in E. crassipes roots was 2143 mg/kg and 1881 mg/kg, respectively. This study found that Pb BCA in E. crassipes roots decreased with increased Ca2+ concentrations in both karst and non-karst water. Therefore, Pb removal rates from water and BCA in roots of E. crassipes exhibited opposite trends in response to Ca2+ concentration. The statistical correlations between Pb BCA in E. crassipes and Pb removal rate from water as a function of Ca2+ concentration were tested via Spearman rank correlation analysis with SPSS 19. The correlation was significant at a 0.01 confidence level (bilateral). Xie [22] analyzed the effects of Ca2+ on the Pb stress response of Epipremnum aureum and reported that Ca2+ significantly decreased Pb enrichment in roots. Moreover, Shi et al. [23] reported that exogenous Ca2+ addition could significantly reduce heavy metal absorption by the roots of Wedelia trilobata. Li et al. [24] also demonstrated that Ca2+ addition significantly reduced Pb enrichment in Lentinus edodes, which was consistent with our results.
BCF is among the most important indicators of heavy metal absorption in plants. It is expressed as the ratio between the heavy metal concentrations in aquatic plant tissues to the concentration in water, whereby a BCF > 1 is indicative of heavy metal accumulation in plants [25]. The Pb BCF in E. crassipes roots in 60 mg/L Ca2+ karst water (30,306) was higher than that in non-karst water with 20 mg/L Ca2+ (21,583), which was consistent with the Pb removal rate in water. The highest Pb BCF (31,531) was observed in 80 mg/L Ca2+ karst water. The Pb BCF in E. crassipes roots in 60 mg/L Ca2+ non-karst water (35,186) was higher than that in 20 mg/L Ca2+ non-karst water.
TF represents the ability of plants to transfer the absorbed heavy metals from underground to aboveground structures. A TF value > 1 indicates that the plant has a strong ability to transport a certain heavy metal [26]. The Pb TF in E. crassipes in water with different Ca2+ concentrations was below 1, indicating that the Pb transport ability of E. crassipes was weak regardless of Ca2+ concentration. High Ca2+ concentrations in water had no significant effect on the ability of E. crassipes to transfer Pb from roots to stems and leaves. E. crassipes has the ability to protect leaves and stems from the toxic effects of Pb on photosynthesis. Plants commonly absorb harmful heavy metals into their roots as a defense mechanism to prevent toxicity to leaves and stems and to maintain photosynthesis and other metabolic activities [27,28]. The lowest Pb TF occurred in 80 mg/L Ca2+ karst water (0.0650). The Pb TF in E. crassipes in 60 mg/L Ca2+ non-karst water (0.211) was lower than that in non-karst water with 20 mg/L Ca2+ (0.256). A similar study reported that certain Ca2+ concentrations could inhibit the transport of heavy metals from underground to aboveground plant structures [15].

3.3. Morphology Analysis

The morphology of roots, stems, and leaves of E. crassipes in water was examined by SEM. The SEM images of roots, stems, and leaves of E. crassipes in 60 and 80 mg/L Ca2+ karst water are illustrated in Figure 3.
Roots are vital structures for plant growth, as they are mainly responsible for absorbing water and inorganic salts. The root system is comprised of taproots and fibrous roots, which are largely responsible for pollutant removal. Figure 3a shows that there are voids between the taproots and fibrous roots of E. crassipes. Many of these voids develop into air passages, which provide buoyancy, support, and favorable conditions for roots to absorb heavy metals and enhance the adaptability of E. crassipes to aquatic environments. The cell walls of roots act as a biological semipermeable membrane, which is difficult for large molecular weight substances, nonionic compounds, and colloids to penetrate. There is also a large contact area between the root system and the water surface, which forms a filter layer capable of absorbing a variety of heavy metals to improve water quality [8,29]. As shown in Figure 3b,c, the voids between the taproots and fibrous roots did not change significantly in karst water with 60 and 80 mg/L Ca2+. Moreover, fibrous roots were more fragile in karst water with 60 mg/L than in karst water with 80 mg/L Ca2+. This study demonstrated that Pb had low toxicity on E. crassipes roots, which was attributable to the high Ca2+ concentrations in karst water. Similar studies also showed that high concentrations of Ca2+ could reduce the toxicity of heavy metals to other plants [23,24].
Leaves are important plant structures that are responsible for photosynthesis, gas exchange, and transpiration. Leaves have a relatively large surface area and contain many stomas, distributed evenly on the epidermis. Figure 3d illustrates the highly developed stoma structure of E. crassipes leaves, which enhances the photosynthesis and transpiration capacity of E. crassipes and promotes a more efficient heavy metal absorption in water through the roots. As shown in Figure 3e, most stomas were closed after absorbing Pb in 60 mg/L Ca2+ karst water. A similar study reported that E. crassipes possesses many small stomas, which closed upon safranin exposure [30]. Heavy metals enter leaves through the open stomas and then compromise the physiological activities of plants [31]. Brunet et al. [32] demonstrated that heavy metals disrupted carbon sequestration, which was attributed to stomatal closure. As shown in Figure 3f, when the Ca2+ concentration was 80 mg/L in karst water, a few stomas were still open. Therefore, our results suggest that Pb seriously damaged leaf morphology and high Ca2+ concentrations in karst water alleviated this Pb-induced morphological damage.
Stems are comprised of a highly developed intercellular epidermis, spongy cortex, vascular bundles, and medulla; the vascular bundle is arranged as a ring around the medulla, forming a complex network. As shown in Figure 3g, these structures are comprised of many interconnected air chambers and different sized airways, which facilitate gas exchange and storage. As shown in Figure 3h, after absorbing Pb in 60 mg/L Ca2+ karst water, the cortex became atrophied and thin, and the volume of the annular vascular bundle structure decreased. As shown in Figure 3i, the cortical morphology of stems was less affected in 80 mg/L Ca2+ karst water. These results suggest that E. crassipes stems were seriously damaged by Pb; however, the high concentration of Ca2+ in karst water reduced the Pb-induced morphological effects in stems.
The voids in roots, leaf stomas, air chambers, and stem airways provided favorable conditions for E. crassipes to accumulate large amounts of Pb. The morphology of stems and leaves was damaged more seriously than that of roots after absorbing Pb, indicating that roots had a stronger tolerance to Pb than stems and leaves. The results of this study demonstrate that roots were the main E. crassipes structures responsible for Pb absorption. Moreover, increased Ca2+ concentrations in water led to a reduction in Pb-induced damage to roots, stems, and leaves, thereby enhancing the adaptability of E. crassipes to Pb stress.

3.4. Functional Group Analysis

Figure 4 illustrates the transmittance spectrum of E. crassipes roots before and after absorbing Pb in water with different Ca2+ concentrations. FTIR spectra can provide a wealth of useful information on functional groups [33]. As shown in Figure 4, the FTIR spectrum of E. crassipes roots exhibited a few intense bands associated with organic functional groups. The broad band observed at 3453 cm−1 was attributed to O-H stretching vibration. The spectra peak at 2927 cm−1 represented -CH3 stretching vibration. The spectrum band observed at 2347 cm−1 reflected C≡C stretching vibration. The spectra peak at 1651 cm−1 represented protein C=O stretching vibration. The spectra band observed at 1033 cm−1 reflected C-O stretching vibration. The spectra peak at 534 cm−1 was attributed to SO42− stretching vibration [34].
As shown in Figure 4, both C≡C peaks shifted from 2347 to 2345 cm−1, and the peak strength of C≡C in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+ was smaller than that in non-karst water with 20 mg/L Ca2+. The protein C=O peak on the cell walls at 1651cm−1 did not shift, but the peak strength in karst water was greater than that in non-karst water, indicating that the cell wall structure changed when the protein C=O interacted with Pb [35]. The SO42− peak at 534 cm−1 shifted to 540 cm−1 in karst water but shifted to 670 cm−1 in non-karst water. The peak strength of the SO42− stretching vibration in karst water was greater than that in non-karst water. Therefore, this study demonstrated that C≡C, protein C=O, and SO42− played different roles in karst and non-karst water. O-H only had an effect in karst water, and the O-H peak shifted from 3453 to 3459 cm−1. The C-O peak only reacted in non-karst water, where it shifted from 1033 to 1036 cm−1. It is speculated that the different hydrochemical characteristics of karst and non-karst water may lead to the observed differences in functional groups, spectrum shapes, and the displacement and strength of some peaks, which should be examined in future research.
No significant changes in FTIR spectra shape were observed in karst water with 60, 80, and 100 mg/L Ca2+, suggesting that high Ca2+ concentrations in karst water did not obviously change the basic chemical composition of roots. Li [36] reported similar results in E. crassipes exposed to heavy metals in polluted aquatic environments. However, the displacement and strength of some peaks changed. The O-H peaks at 3453 cm−1 shifted to 3459, 3434, and 3433 cm−1 in karst water with 60, 80, and 100 mg/L Ca2+, respectively. Moreover, the O-H peak strength increased with increased Ca2+ concentrations, indicating that Ca2+ concentrations in karst water increased the occurrence of hydroxyl hydrogen bonds on the surface of E. crassipes. The C≡C peak at 2347 cm−1 had a same displacement, but the peak strength decreased with increased Ca2+ concentrations, suggesting that the strength of alkynyl groups on the surface of E. crassipes weakened as a result of combining Pb with the high Ca2+ concentrations in karst water. Acetylene compounds are easily oxidized; however, higher Ca2+ concentrations in karst water reduced the oxidization of the acetylene bond of alkynyl. The protein C=O peak at 1651 cm−1 did not shift, but the peak strength increased with higher Ca2+ concentrations, suggesting that cell wall structure changed when exposed to Pb. This result was consistent with a previous study that compared infrared spectroscopy between endogenous and exogenous metals in phytoplankton [37]. Protein C=O bonds played a more important role during Pb exposure. Cells absorb heavy metal ions through extracellular space, and the cell walls of plants are the first barrier against pollutants. The polyuronic acid and cellulose in cell walls provide a large number of exchange sites for pollutants [38]. Pb has a notably large ion radius and weak coordination ability. Therefore, it is difficult for Pb to enter into the cytoplasm through the cell wall and plasma membrane. E. crassipes absorbs Pb mainly through cell walls, as well as through non-metabolic interstitial diffusion between cells. Pb begins to enter the cytoplasm through the cell walls and plasma membranes after reaching saturation, and the toxicity of Pb to E. crassipes is low when the absorption speed is fast [39]. The peak strength of SO42− at 534 cm−1 shifted to 540, 559, and 643 cm−1 in karst water with 60, 80, and 100 mg/L Ca2+, respectively. The increased SO42− displacement indicated the presence of a small amount of sulfuric acid in E. crassipes. SO42− played a more significant role with increased Ca2+ concentrations. This study showed that when the Ca2+ concentration increased from 60 to 80 mg/L, O-H, C≡C, protein C=O, and SO42− responded to Pb exposure. When the Ca2+ concentration increased to 100 mg/L, a new functional group (C-O) at 1033 cm−1 was identified. The occurrence of O-H at 3453 cm−1 and C-O at 1033 cm−1 proved that E. crassipes contains alcoholic hydroxyl groups. Alcohol compounds are easily oxidized [34]. In this study, the results showed that alcoholic hydroxyls played a more significant role in karst water with high Ca2+ concentrations.
Our results suggest that high Ca2+ concentrations play an important role in regulating the response of functional groups in E. crassipes during Pb exposure. Some organic compounds such as alcohol and sulfate resins are known to be present in E. crassipes and both alcoholic hydroxyls and SO42− play a more significant role in water with high Ca2+ concentrations. Increases in Ca2+ concentrations in water reduce the oxidization of alkynyl acetylene bonds and therefore protect the cell of E. crassipes form heavy metal-induced damage.

3.5. Ion Exchange Analysis

Figure 5 illustrates the elemental composition and distribution in E. crassipes roots before and after Pb absorption from water with different Ca2+ concentrations. As shown in Figure 5, the Pb and Ca content in E. crassipes roots increased after absorbing the waterborne Pb. In contrast, the Mg, Na, and K contents in E. crassipes roots decreased. These observations are suggestive of cation exchange, whereby Pb was exchanged for Mg, Na, and K during the process of Pb absorption form water. Li et al. [34] demonstrated that Ca, Mg, and K were depleted from E. crassipes roots, while Cu and Cr were accumulated upon Pb exposure. Xia [40] also demonstrated that Pb was exchanged for K, Ca, and Mg during the absorption of Pb by E. crassipes, which was consistent with our results. The absorption of Ca and the depletion of Mg, Na, and K was more pronounced in E. crassipes roots when the Ca2+ concentrations in karst water were higher, indicating that high Ca2+ concentrations stimulated cation exchange. Furthermore, Na: K proportions in E. crassipes roots (0.228, 0.341, and 0.362) and Ca: Mg proportions (11.6, 19.8, and 29.8) increased in roots with increased Ca2+ concentrations in karst water (60, 80, and 100 mg/L).

3.6. Elemental Biogeochemical Behavior

Plants are selective in absorbing elements. Generally, plants absorb elements that are richer, easier to obtain, and that can serve a particular function. Ca is an essential element for plants. It is also an important plant growth regulator and mediates the response to environmental changes [11]. Pb is a nonessential trace element that occurs in nature; however, its accumulation can lead to serious toxic effects. Pb accumulation in plants mainly affects photosynthesis and transpiration. In our study, higher Ca2+ concentrations in the water led to decreased Pb BCA and higher Ca absorption in E. crassipes roots (Table 3). These results suggest that there was a competitive relationship between Ca and Pb in the process of being absorbed by E. crassipes. High Ca2+ concentrations in water therefore inhibited the absorption of Pb.
Pb concentration and form in natural water are affected by the concentrations of CO32−, SO42−, and OH, which facilitate the precipitation of Pb into PbCO3, PbSO4, and Pb(OH)2. The concentration of Pb in water is controlled by hydroxide ions, and the main complexation reactions in natural waters can be described as follows:
P b 2 + + O H = P b O H +
P b 2 + + 2 O H = P b ( O H ) 2 0
P b 2 + + 3 O H = P b ( O H ) 3
P b 2 + + C l = P b C l +
P b 2 + + 2 C l = P b ( C l ) 2 0
When the pH of water is 8.5, the proportions of Pb complexes are typically 88% PbOH+, 10% PbCO3, and 2% (PbCl+ + PbSO4) [41]. OH and CO32− can form ion pairs with Ca2+, but this mainly occurs in strongly alkaline solutions (pH > 9.5). The pH of karst water used in our experiments was 7.25 and pH varied between 8.27 and 8.60 as the Ca2+ concentration increased. The pH of natural water mainly depends on its free carbon dioxide (CO2) content and carbonate equilibrium. E. crassipes absorbs a substantial amount of CO2 during photosynthesis and pH likely increased due to photosynthesis-linked CO2 uptake. OH tended to form complexes with Pb rather than with Ca2+ due to the increase of pH in water. Some of the dissolved Pb existed in the form of PbOH+, PbCO3, PbCl+, and PbSO4. However, the solubility and mobility of Pb decreased because PbCO3 and PbSO4 are insoluble in water, which affected the absorption of Pb by E. crassipes. As the pH of the water increased with the increase of Ca2+ concentrations, PbCO3 and PbSO4 became more abundant.
As a result of increased Ca2+ concentrations, the precipitation of PbCO3 and PbSO4 and the competitive relationship between Ca and Pb in water led to a decrease in Pb BCA in E. crassipes and a higher Pb removal rate from water. Moreover, high Ca2+ concentrations alleviated the Pb-induced morphological damage to roots, stems, and leaves.

4. Conclusions

In summary, high Ca2+ concentrations improved the Pb removal efficiency of E. crassipes in karst water, but reduced the Pb BCA in E. crassipes roots. In contrast, the Ca BCA in roots increased, with increased Ca2+ concentrations in karst water. The highest bioconcentration factor and the lowest transport factor of Pb occurred in 80 mg/L Ca2+ karst water. The differences in bioconcentration amounts and removal rates induced by higher Ca2+ concentrations were attributed to Pb precipitation (i.e., as PbCO3 and PbSO4) and the competitive relationship between Ca and Pb in karst water. High Ca2+ concentrations in karst water increased the strength of cation exchange, whereby Pb was exchanged for Mg, Na, and K. Moreover, high Ca2+ concentrations in karst water alleviated Pb-induced structural damage to roots, stems, and leaves, and protected the cell wall of E. crassipes. Ca2+ also regulated the functional groups involved during Pb exposure in E. crassipes. The oxidization of alkynyl acetylene bonds decreased, and alcohol compounds and sulfate resin were both important during Pb pressing in water with high Ca2+ concentrations. Therefore, increasing the supply of Ca2+ could reduce the uptake of Pb and alleviate Pb toxicity in E. crassipes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z. and Z.J.; Methodology, J.Z.; Software, J.Z.; Validation, J.Z., Z.J., and L.Z.; Formal Analysis, J.Z.; Investigation, J.Z.; Resources, Z.J., X.Q., and Q.H.; Data Curation, J.Z.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.Z.; Writing—Review & Editing, J.Z., Z.J., and L.Z.; Visualization, J.Z.; Supervision, J.Z., Z.J., and G.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571203), the Basic Scientific Research Operating Expenses Project of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (YYWF201725), the China Geological Survey’s Project (DD20190343), and the China Scholarship Council (CSC) (No. 201908110325).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, L.; Liu, G.J.; Zhou, C.C.; Liu, R.Q.; Xi, S.S.; Da, C.N.; Liu, F. Spatial distributions, fractionation characteristics, and ecological risk assessment of trace elements in sediments of Chaohu Lake, a large eutrophic freshwater lake in eastern China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, J.M.; Jiang, Z.C.; Xu, G.L.; Qin, X.Q.; Huang, Q.B.; Zhang, L.K. Major Ionic Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Karst Groundwater at Xiangshui, Chongzuo. Environ. Sci. 2019, 40, 2143–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jiménez-Madrid, A.; Gogu, R.; Martinez-Navarrete, C.; Carrasco, F. Groundwater for human Consumptionin karst environment: Vulnerability, protection, and management. In The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry Book Series: Karst Water Environment, 1st ed.; Younos, T., Schreiber, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 68, pp. 46–61. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ji, M.C.; Zhang, J.Q.; Peng, Y.; Ma, Q.Y. Research on the resistances of several kinds of hydrophyte to Lead in hydroponic condition. Biotechnol. Bull. 2017, 33, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saxena, G.; Bharagava, R.N. Organic and inorganic pollutants in industrial wastes, their ecotoxicological effects, health hazards and bioremediation approaches. In Environmental Pollutants and Their Bioremediation Approaches, 1st ed.; Bharagava, R.N., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 23–56. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, H.X.; Huo, S.L.; Yeager, K.M.; Xi, B.D.; Zhang, J.T.; He, Z.S.; Ma, C.Z.; Wu, F.C. Accumulation of arsenic, mercury and heavy metals in lacustrine sediment in relation to eutrophication: Impacts of sources and climate change. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 93, 771–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yi, Z.J.; Yao, J.; Chen, H.L.; Wang, F.; Yuan, Z.M.; Liu, X. Uranium biosorption from aqueous solution onto Eichhornia crassipes. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016, 154, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Feng, W.; Xiao, K.; Zhou, W.B.; Zhu, D.W.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Yuan, Y.N.; Xiao, N.D.; Wan, A.Q.; Hua, Y.M.; Zhao, J.W. Analysis of utilization technologies for Eichhornia crassipes biomass harvested after restoration of wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 223, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahamadi, C.; Nharingo, T. Utilization of water hyacinth weed (Eichhornia crassipes) for the removal of Pb(II), Cd(II) and Zn(II) from aquatic environments: And adsorption isotherm study. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 1221–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Suryandari, M.K.; Hariati, A.M.; Mahmudi, M. Removal of Lead from water by Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. Imp. J. Interdiscip. Res. 2017, 3, 2387–2392. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirschi, K.D. The calcium conundrum: Both versatile nutrient and specific signal. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2438–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zaki, F.T.; Fathi, A.A. Impact of copper on some physiological aspects of Nostoc muscorum with special references to the detoxifying role of calcium. Acta Bot. Hung. 2004, 46, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, L.L.; Feng, T.; Xiang, Y.C.; Xiao, L.; Yan, M.L. Effect of exogenous calcium on seedling growth and physiological characteristics of Brassica Juncea under cadmium stress. J. Agro Environ. Sci. 2009, 28, 978–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lu, L.L.; Tian, S.K.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Yang, X.E.; Jiang, H. The role of Ca pathway in Cd uptake and translocation by the hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liao, X.X.; Chen, T.B.; Xiao, X.Y.; Huang, Z.C.; An, Z.Z.; Mo, L.Y.; Li, W.X.; Chen, H.; Zheng, Y.M. Spatial distributions of arsenic in contaminated paddy soils. Geogr. Res. 2003, 9, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Calile, N.; Swanwick, S.; Zhao, F.J.; McGrath, S.P. Arsenic hyperaccumulation by Pteris vittata from arsenic contaminated soils and the effect of liming and phosphate fertilisation. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 132, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Min, H.L.; Can, S.J.; Xu, Q.S.; Shi, G.X. Effects of exogenous calcium on resistance of Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle to cadmium stress. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2012, 32, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Heeraman, D.A.; Claassen, V.P.; Zasoski, R.J. Interaction of lime, organic matter and fertilizer on growth and uptake of arsenic and mercury by Zorro fescue (Vu lpia myuros L.). Plant Soil 2001, 234, 215–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, L.K.; Qin, X.Q.; Huang, Q.B.; Liu, P.Y.; Shan, X.J. Aquatic plants bioremediation to groundwater contaminated by mines in karst areas. Carsologica Sin. 2017, 36, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yin, X.Q.; Saha, U.; Ma, L. Effectiveness of best management practices in reducing Pb-bullet weathering in a shooting range in Florida. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 179, 895–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, S.F.; Zhao, M.J.; Li, J.S.; Feng, J.; Liu, Q. Removal of Zinc and Lead from blast furnace dust in a fluidized-bed roaster. J. Sustain. Metall. 2017, 3, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xie, S.J. Study on the Enrichment Characteristics of Heavy Metals in Epipremnum aureum and Related Mechanisms; Ocean University of China: Qingdao, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shi, H.P.; Wang, Y.L.; Eric, T.; LeeWah, C. Alleviated affect of exogenous CaCl2 on the growth, antioxidative enzyme activities and cadmium absorption efficiency of Wedelia trilobata hairy roots under cadmium stress. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 747–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, H.B.; Wei, H.B.; Hu, C.J.; Fu, L.Z.; Wu, X.Q.; Wu, Q.Q. Inhibitory effect of exogenous Ca2+ on accumulation of heavy metals in Lentinula edodes. For. Prod. Spec. China 2013, 127, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Farahat, E.; Linderholm, H.W. The effect of long-term wastewater irrigation on accumulation and transfer of heavy metals in Cupressus sempervirens leaves and adjacent soils. Sci. Total. Environ. 2015, 512, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guan, B.T.H.; Mohamat-Yusuff, F.; Halimoon, N.; Yong, C.S.Y. Uptake of Mn and Cd by wild Water Spinach and their bioaccumulation and translocation factors. Environ. Asia. 2017, 10, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sarital, S.; Rohit, S.; Shraddha, S. Comparative studies on accumulation of Cr from metal solution and tannery effluent under repeated metal exposure by aquatic plants: Its toxic effects. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2002, 80, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Woldemichael, D.; Zewge, F.; Leta, S. Potential of water Hyacinth (Eichhornia Crassipes (Mart.) Solms) for the removal of chromium from trannery effluent in constructed pond system. Ethiop. J. Sci. 2011, 34, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  29. Han, L.H.; Zhang, Y.P.; Di, X.M.; Huang, A.L.; Liu, C. Anatomical characteristics and ecological adaptability of vegetative organs of three invasive plants. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2018, 46, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rani, S.; Sumanjit, K.; Mahajan, R.K. Comparative study of surface modified carbonized Eichhornia crassipes for adsorption of dye safranin. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 2436–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Malar, S.; Vikram, S.S.; Favas, P.J.C.; Perumal, V. Lead heavy metal toxicity induced changes on growth and antioxidative enzymes level in water hyacinths [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)]. Bot Stud. 2014, 55, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Brunet, J.; Repellin, A.; Varrault, G.; Terrync, N.; Zuily-fodil, Y. Lead accumulation in the roots of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.): A novel plant for phytoremediation systems. CR Biol. 2008, 331, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Y.J.; Wang, B.; Guo, X.J.; Zou, C.W.; Tan, X.D. Investigating adsorption performance of heavy metals onto humic acid from sludge using Fourier-transform infrared combined with two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 9842–9850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, X.J.; Li, C.W.; Zhu, Q.L.; Huang, T.; Cai, Y.; Li, N.X.; Liu, J.Y.; Tan, X.D. Characterization of dissolved organic matter from biogas residue composting using spectroscopic techniques. Waste Manag. 2018, 78, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Q.; Chen, B.; Lin, P.; Zhou, J.L.; Zhan, J.H.; Shen, Q.Y.; Pan, X.J. Adsorption of heavy metal from aqueous solution by dehydrated root powder of Long-root Eichhornia crassipes. Int. J. Phytorem. 2014, 18, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, Q. Research on Removal Mechanisms of Four Kinds of Heavy Metals in Water by Long-Root Eichhornia crassipes and Its Recycling; Kunming University Science and Technology: Kunming, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  37. Han, R.P.; Li, J.J.; Yang, G.Y.; Bao, G.L. Comparison of infrared spectroscopy between native and binding metals’ phytoplankton. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 2000, 20, 489–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, H.X. Ecology of Pollution; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China; Springer Press: Berlin, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cai, C.X.; Wang, H.M.; Zhang, C.M. Studies on beneficiation mechanism and speed rate of removal of five heavy metalic ions by Water Gourd. J. Youjiang Teach. Coll. Natl. Guangxi 2002, 15, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xia, W. Preparation of Biochar and Adsorption of Heavy Metals in Soil; Nanjing Normal University: Nanjing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jang, H. Environmental Hydrochemistry; Chemistry Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Experimental design.
Figure 1. Experimental design.
Ijerph 17 00928 g001
Figure 2. The removal of lead (Pb) in water by Eichhornia crassipes under different concentrations of calcium ion (Ca2+).
Figure 2. The removal of lead (Pb) in water by Eichhornia crassipes under different concentrations of calcium ion (Ca2+).
Ijerph 17 00928 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) roots before experiment, (b) roots in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+, (c) roots in karst water with 80 mg/L Ca2+, (d) leaves before experiment, (e) leaves in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+, (f) leaves in karst water with 80 mg/L Ca2+,(g) stems before experiment, (h) stems in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+, (i) stems in karst water with 80 mg/L Ca2+.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) roots before experiment, (b) roots in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+, (c) roots in karst water with 80 mg/L Ca2+, (d) leaves before experiment, (e) leaves in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+, (f) leaves in karst water with 80 mg/L Ca2+,(g) stems before experiment, (h) stems in karst water with 60 mg/L Ca2+, (i) stems in karst water with 80 mg/L Ca2+.
Ijerph 17 00928 g003
Figure 4. Transmittance spectrum of E. crassipes roots before and after absorbing Pb in water with different Ca2+ concentrations.
Figure 4. Transmittance spectrum of E. crassipes roots before and after absorbing Pb in water with different Ca2+ concentrations.
Ijerph 17 00928 g004
Figure 5. Elemental composition and distribution in E. crassipes roots before and after Pb absorption from water with different Ca2+ concentrations.
Figure 5. Elemental composition and distribution in E. crassipes roots before and after Pb absorption from water with different Ca2+ concentrations.
Ijerph 17 00928 g005
Table 1. Hydrochemical parameters of karst water and non-karst water used in the experiments.
Table 1. Hydrochemical parameters of karst water and non-karst water used in the experiments.
ParametersKarst WaterNon-karst WaterParametersKarst WaterNon-karst Water
pH7.257.50K+/mg·L−13.461.95
Pb/µg·L−1<0.07<0.07Na+/mg·L−11.021.16
Al/µg·L−138.541.9Ca2+/mg·L−157.0623.42
Zn/µg·L−10.884.29Mg2+/mg·L−13.661.33
Cr/µg·L−14.521.30NH4+/mg·L−10.060<0.02
Ni/µg·L−11.400.91Cl/mg·L−13.045.25
Co/µg·L−1<0.03<0.03SO42−/mg·L−19.329.00
Cd/µg·L−1<0.06<0.06HCO3/mg·L−1173.5658.61
Mn/µg·L−144.66.92CO32−/mg·L−10.000.00
As/µg·L−11.160.64NO3/mg·L−10.848.17
Hg/µg·L−137.81.15NO2/mg·L−1<0.0020.002
Cu/µg·L−10.480.98F/mg·L−10.0780.080
CO2/mg·L−18.953.83PO43−/mg·L−10.230.040
SiO2/mg·L−15.355.25OH/mg·L−10.000.00
Permanganate index (CODMn) /mg·L−12.07<0.5Total iron (TFe) /mg·L−10.130.012
Table 2. Experimental parameters of the effects of calcium ion (Ca2+) concentrations on Eichhornia crassipes absorbing lead (Pb) in water.
Table 2. Experimental parameters of the effects of calcium ion (Ca2+) concentrations on Eichhornia crassipes absorbing lead (Pb) in water.
Experimental
Water
Heavy
Metal
CompoundsInitial concentration of Pb (mg/L)Volume of Water (L)Mass of Eichhornia crassipes (g)Mass of Pb(NO3)2 (g)Concentration of Ca2+ in Water (mg/L)Mass of CaCl2
(g)
Karst WaterPbPb(NO3)20.581500.0064600
800.4430
1000.8861
Non-karst
Water
PbPb(NO3)20.581500.0064200
600.8861
Table 3. Elemental composition of different E. crassipes structures before and after Pb absorption in water with different Ca2+ concentrations (mg/kg).
Table 3. Elemental composition of different E. crassipes structures before and after Pb absorption in water with different Ca2+ concentrations (mg/kg).
Water
Body
Concentrations of Ca2+ in Water (mg/L)PartsCaMgKNaPFeMnPbCdCuZn
Roots13,40111573021690252915,036232017710.44814.8212
Karst
Water
60Stems and Leaves17,800125115,301663293228953021770.093317777.8
Whole Plant16,700122812,231690283159308065760.182136111
Roots13,555684170358119417351153713240.5209.47155
80Stems and Leaves20,600129410,938612328749122586.50.13431.445.0
Whole Plant18,83911428629604295022065533960.23025.972.5
Roots15,96853715355552171504788911030.2478.72119
100Stems and Leaves22,100905618161031967703001730.10937.252.7
Whole Plant20,5678135020596294018394474060.14430.169.3
Non-karst
Water
Roots12,610671217357419039183218018880.33113.3220
60Stems and Leaves20,900108613,39165132509643613980.13338.257.4
Whole Plant18,82898210,586632291330198167700.18232.098.0
Roots13,31657616085571859380183821510.2049.70108
20Stems and Leaves17,600121714,59461028095743085500.086032.334.3
Whole Plant16,529105711,348597257213814409500.11626.652.7
Roots6600420017,40023002000944218177.670.3609.2598.1
UnloadedStems and Leaves15,500170032,80083029002791920.7300.037018.938.7
Whole Plant13,275232528,9501198267525705982.460.11816.553.6
Table 4. Enrichment of Pb in different E. crassipes structures in water with different Ca2+ concentrations.
Table 4. Enrichment of Pb in different E. crassipes structures in water with different Ca2+ concentrations.
Water BodyConcentrations of Ca2+ in Water (mg/L)Concentration of Pb in Water After the Experiment (mg/kg)Removal Rate
(%)
PartsBCA (mg/kg)BCFTF
Karst
Water
60 Roots176330,360\
0.058 ± 0.01885.31 ± 5.61Stems and Leaves1773039\
Whole Plant57698660.100
80 Roots131731,531\
0.042 ± 0.01388.87 ± 4.68Stems and Leaves85.72059\
Whole Plant39694260.0650
100 Roots109528,761\
0.038 ± 0.01592.44 ± 3.40Stems and Leaves1734523\
Whole Plant40610,5780.157
Non-karst
Water
60 Roots188135,186\
0.054 ± 0.01985.24 ± 8.91Stems and Leaves3987424\
Whole Plant77014,3570.211
20 Roots214321,583\
0.010 ± 0.04177.04 ± 10.26Stems and Leaves5495517\
Whole Plant95095340.256

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, J.-m.; Jiang, Z.-c.; Qin, X.-q.; Zhang, L.-k.; Huang, Q.-b.; Xu, G.-l. Effects and Mechanisms of Calcium Ion Addition on Lead Removal from Water by Eichhornia crassipes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030928

AMA Style

Zhou J-m, Jiang Z-c, Qin X-q, Zhang L-k, Huang Q-b, Xu G-l. Effects and Mechanisms of Calcium Ion Addition on Lead Removal from Water by Eichhornia crassipes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(3):928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030928

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Jin-mei, Zhong-cheng Jiang, Xiao-qun Qin, Lian-kai Zhang, Qi-bo Huang, and Guang-li Xu. 2020. "Effects and Mechanisms of Calcium Ion Addition on Lead Removal from Water by Eichhornia crassipes" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 3: 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030928

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop