Next Article in Journal
Drone Noise Emission Characteristics and Noise Effects on Humans—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Green Color Exposure on Stress, Anxiety, and Pain during Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation in Dental Patients Requiring Sedation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 11
10.3390/ijerph18115943
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Children’s Smartphone Addiction on Sleep Duration: The Moderating Effects of Gender and Age

by
Ji-Yeon Yoon
1,
Kyu-Hyoung Jeong
2,* and
Heeran J. Cho
3,*
1
Institute for Life and Culture, Sogang University, Seoul 04100, Korea
2
Department of Social Welfare, Semyung University, Jecheon 27136, Korea
3
Department of Health Administration, Yonsei University, Seoul 03021, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(11), 5943; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115943
Submission received: 9 March 2021 / Revised: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 18 May 2021 / Published: 1 June 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Smartphones are an important part of children’s and adolescents’ lives, and they often spend a lot of time using them. This study aims to precisely discover the effects of smartphone addiction on sleep duration as moderated by age and gender. Materials and methods: The data utilized in this study are from the ‘Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey 2018′ by the National Youth Policy Institute; a total of 4940 youths (2399 in grade 4 and 2541 in grade 7) from the survey were analyzed by Stata 15.0 S. The dependent variable is sleep duration, and the independent variables are the sub-factors of smartphone addiction: disturbance of adaptive functions, virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance. An independent t-test was conducted to confirm the differences in the main variables according to gender and age. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to verify the moderating effects of gender and age in the relationship between children’s smartphone addiction and sleep duration. Results: First, the average sleep duration among grade 4 students was 9.17 h and grade 7 students was 7.96 h. Second, sleep duration was significantly higher for males than females, while there was no difference in smartphone addiction by gender. Third, smartphone addiction, particularly the sub-factor of tolerance significantly affected sleep duration. Fourth, age significantly affected sleep duration and gender had a moderating effect on sleep duration. Conclusions: Interventions to develop a healthy smartphone usage culture on family and societal levels would be beneficial for increasing awareness of smartphone addiction and its adverse effects on children and adolescents. Furthermore, targeted intervention would be more effective at modifying addictive behavior and sleep duration than trying to administer blanket interventions to youths as a whole.

1. Introduction

As mobile phones have become more advanced, offering users increasing capabilities and becoming more computer-like than cellphone-like, the new term “Smartphone” was adopted [1]. Smartphones allow access to a nearly limitless amount of education, knowledge, and every connected person in the world [2]. Smartphones are becoming increasingly like miniature laptops as they offer web browsing, WiFi, and a variety of educational and entertainment applications, and smartphones are popular and widely available [3]. Additionally, many modern smartphones have sleek and attractive designs, and their features are constantly evolving to be more convenient for users, especially for children and adolescents.
In Korea, 90% of 10- to 18-year-old children and adolescents owned a smartphone in 2018; this figure has been rapidly increasing since 2012 [4]. Korean children’s and adolescents’ average smartphone usage time is 36.2 h per week, which is 12.7 h longer than that of Korean adults’ usage [5]. It has been revealed that 3 out of 10 adolescents were shown to be over-dependent on smartphones, and those students used their smartphones for 63.5 h per week, or more than 9 h per day on average, negatively affecting their sleep and studies [5].
While smartphones have many productive applications, such as sending e-mails or utilizing reference and productivity applications [6], their overuse can cause a wide range of problems. Excessive smartphone use may be harmful to fingers, hands, wrists, and forearms [7]. Poor posture may cause damage to the muscles and bones of the neck and spine [8], and people may also be susceptible to neurological disorders such as depression [9,10,11,12]. It has also been reported that excessive use of smartphones leads to an increase in psychological problems, mainly among young people [13,14]. Turel and Serenko submitted that addictions may go beyond the scope of substance addictions, and smartphone addiction is an example of this [10].
According to Kim, excessive use of smartphones can be a sign of smartphone addiction [15], which is defined as compulsive and problematic behavioral patterns in using smartphones, inability to control use of smartphones, experiencing withdrawal symptoms when unable to use smartphones, increased tolerance with greater use, and functional impairment [16,17]. Scholars have attempted to define various sub-categories of smartphone addiction. Lin and her colleagues revealed and outlined the components of smartphone addiction as tolerance, withdrawal, compulsive symptoms, and functional impairment [16] and Kim outlined the components of smartphone addiction as tolerance, withdrawal, disturbance of adaptive functions, and virtual orientation [18].
Studies have reported contradictory findings regarding gender differences and smartphone addiction. Some revealed that females are more likely to be addicted to smartphones and engage in problematic smartphone usage [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Other studies showed that males experienced higher levels of problematic smartphone usage compared to females [9,26,27]. There are also studies that found no gender effect [28]. Age and smartphone usage have showed some degree of correlation. According to the Internet Addiction Survey (2011), smartphone addiction is more prevalent among teenagers than users in their twenties [29]. It has been noted that when people have a low level of education, they are more likely to be addicted to smartphones [29], and it is indicated that young children in general might be susceptible to smartphone addiction as they are too young to make rational decisions [30]. A recent study showed that 1 in 4 middle school students tended to be addicted to smartphones, and increasing numbers of elementary students have access to smartphones [31].
Smartphone use was shown to affect children and adolescents, causing them to have insufficient, disturbed or poor-quality sleep [32,33,34], which has emerged as a public health issue in technologically advanced societies [35]. Specifically, young people often tend to use their smartphones in their beds and before going to sleep [36], leading to insufficient sleep duration [37] and impaired sleep quality accordingly. It is also reported that excessive electronic media (e.g., smartphone) use at night is a risk factor for adolescents’ sleep disturbance and depression [38,39]. Likewise, previous studies reported that smartphone addiction negatively affect sleep duration which may cause adverse health issues.
While various studies have been conducted regarding smartphone addiction, few studies dealt with smartphone addiction sub-factors precisely in relation to gender and age using a large representative national sample. In this study, we investigated smartphone addiction as it affects sleep duration by means of its sub-factors, which include disturbance of adaptive functions, virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance in relation to gender and age, utilizing the ‘Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey 2018 (KCYPS 2018)’ from the National Youth Policy Institute (NYPI), in Sejong, South Korea.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Model

The research model was designed to examine the moderating effects of gender and age in the relationship between smartphone addiction and sleep duration in children and adolescents (Figure 1). The sub-factors of smartphone addiction—disturbance of adaptive functions, virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance—and their effects on sleep duration [17] were put forward in this study.

2.2. Data

The data utilized in this study are from the KCYPS 2018, which is the most recent available survey from the NYPI. The Korean Children and Youth Panel Survey is a nationwide representative survey of children and adolescents in Korea. It aims to produce basic data to be used to establish effective child and youth policies by comprehensively grasping various aspects of child and adolescent growth and development. As of 2018, the sample of KCYPS was extracted using a multi-stage cluster sampling method based on the grade 4 population, who were mostly born in 2008, and the grade 7 population, who were mostly born in 2005. A total of 5197 surveys were completed (2607 grade 4 students, 2590 grade 7 students). NYPI collected the data for only grades 4 and 7 to establish KCYPS 2018, which comprehensively grasp changes in the growth and development of children and adolescents; grade 4 to represent children and grade 7 to represent adolescents. In this study, 4940 youths (2399 in grade 4 and 2541 in grade 7) which had no missing values were included in the analysis. Regarding adequacy of the sample size, the minimum sample size was checked using G*Power 3 (G*Power, Düsseldorf, Germany), Effect Size f2 was set to 0.15, α error probability was set to 0.05, power (1-β probability) was set to 0.8 [40]. The results showed that a minimum value of 98 participants would be sufficient.

2.3. Measures

2.3.1. Dependent Variable: Sleep Duration

The dependent variable of this study was sleep duration, which was based on average wake-up time and average bedtime. It is calculated as follows: (average wake-up time + 24) − average bedtime = sleep duration.

2.3.2. Independent Variable: Smartphone Addiction

The independent variable of this study was smartphone addiction. The scale was modified from the Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale (SAPS) developed by Kim and his colleagues [17] at the NYPI for children and adolescents (Table 1). SAPS consists of a total of 15 questions (5 disturbance of adaptive functions, 2 virtual world orientation, 4 withdrawal, 4 tolerance), and a 4-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, 4 = strongly agree). Disturbance of adaptive functions consisted of 5 items including ‘my school grades dropped due to excessive smartphone use’ and ‘people frequently comment on my excessive smartphone use’. Virtual life orientation consisted of 2 items including ‘when I cannot use a smartphone, I feel like I have lost the entire world’. Withdrawal consisted of 4 items including ‘I get restless and nervous when I am without a smartphone’, and tolerance consisted of 4 items including ‘I try cutting my smartphone usage time, but I fail’. Out of 15 questions, ‘My smartphone does not distract me from my studies’, ‘I am not anxious even when I am without a smartphone’, ‘I don’t spend a lot of time using smartphone’ were coded in reverse. The average of the questions was calculated. The higher the score, the higher the level of smartphone addiction was interpreted. In this study, tolerance means spending increasing time on one’s smartphone, in the same way this concept was used in Lin et al. [16] and American Psychiatric Association [41]. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.884 and reliability was found to be reasonably high.

2.3.3. Moderator Variable

The moderator variables used in this study are gender (male = 0, female = 1) and age (4th grade in elementary school = 0, 7th grade in middle school = 1).

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Stata 15.0 SE was used for the analysis. An independent t-test was conducted to confirm the difference in the main variables according to gender and age. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to verify the moderating effects of gender and age in the relationship between children’s smartphone addiction and sleep duration.

3. Results

3.1. Differences in the Main Variables According to Gender and Age

The results of the independent t-test to find out the differences of the main variables according to gender and age are shown in Table 2 and Table 3. Smartphone addiction did not show any statistically significant difference according to gender, and the sub-factors (the disturbance of adaptive functions, virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance) were also found to be statistically insignificant. However, regarding sleep duration, the males’ average was 8.64 h (SD = 1.01) and the females’ average was 8.45 h (SD = 1.15), and this difference was statistically significant (t = 6.342, p < 0.001). In the case of age, there was a significant difference in smartphone addiction and sleep duration. Specifically, smartphone addiction was significantly lower in grade 4 students (M = 1.75, SD = 0.50) than grade 7 students (M = 1.97, SD = 0.48) (t = −16.352, p < 0.001). Sub-factors, disturbance of adaptive functions, virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance were also found to be significantly lower in grade 4 students. The average sleep duration was 9.17 h (SD = 0.81) in grade 4 students and 7.96 h (SD = 0.97) in grade 7 students, and it was confirmed that the grade 4 students had a significantly longer sleep duration than the grade 7 students (t = 47.772, p < 0.001).

3.2. Analysis of Research Model

Table 4 shows the moderating effect of gender in the relationship between smartphone addiction and sleep duration. First, the coefficient of determination for sleep duration was 33.6% (R2 = 0.336), and the regression equation is statistically significant (F = 499.61, p < 0.001). The independent variable, smartphone addiction (B = −0.109, p < 0.05) and the moderator variable, age (B = −1.202, p < 0.001) had a significant effect on sleep duration. The lower the level of smartphone addiction, the longer the sleep duration was for grade 4 students compared to grade 7 students. Meanwhile, gender did not significantly affect sleep duration. For the interactions, smartphone addiction × gender (B = −0.177, p < 0.001) had a significant effect on sleep duration, but smartphone addiction × age was found to have no significant effect on sleep duration.
The effect of using gender as a moderating variable in the relationship between smartphone addiction and sleep duration is shown in Figure 2. It shows that the higher the level of smartphone addiction, the more rapidly the sleep duration for females decreased compared with males.
The effects of gender and age on the relationship between the sub-factors of smartphone addiction (disturbance of adaptive functions, virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance) and sleep duration are shown in Table 5. The coefficient of determination for sleep duration was 33.8% (R2 = 0.338), and the regression equation was statistically significant (F = 179.89, p < 0.001). Sub-factors of smartphone addiction, tolerance (B = −0.139, p < 0.01), as an independent variable, and age (B = −1.230, p < 0.001) as a moderator variable significantly affected sleep duration. In other words, the lower the tolerance score, the longer the sleep duration in grade 4 compared with grade 7, which means that grade 4 students had lower tolerance to smartphone use and got more sleep. Meanwhile, disturbance of adaptive functions, virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and gender did not significantly affect sleep duration. In the case of the interactions, only withdrawal × gender (B = −0.127, p < 0.05) was found to have a significant effect on sleep duration.
The moderator effect of gender in the relationship between withdrawal and sleep duration is shown in Figure 3. It shows that the higher the degree of withdrawal was, the more rapidly the sleep duration decreased in females (Figure 3).

4. Discussions

This study examined the relationship between smartphone addiction and sleep duration with moderating effects of gender and age for the 4940 participants in grade 4 and grade 7 living in South Korea, based on the KCYPS 2018. Specifically, the sub-factors of smartphone addiction—disturbance of adaptive functions, virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance—were investigated in relation to sleep duration. Detailed research discussion points are as follows.
Firstly, there was no difference in smartphone addiction by gender, but sleep duration was significantly longer for males than females. While previous studies showed contradictory results regarding gender [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], this study showed that gender had no significant effect on smartphone addiction, corroborating the studies of Demirci et al. [28]. Furthermore, there were significant differences for smartphone addiction and sleep duration between grade 4 and grade 7 students. Grade 7 students were more addicted to smartphones and had a shorter sleep duration than grade 4 students; grade 7 students experienced more disturbance of adaptive functions, and ranked more highly on measures of virtual life orientation, withdrawal, and tolerance to smartphones than grade 4 students. Park and Park [42] indicated that children could easily become addicted to smartphones because they have not reached the age when they are able to make rational decisions. However, this study suggests that although children still may have not reached an age when they are capable of making rational decisions, smartphone addiction could be more severe among young adolescents than children, as grade 4 students measured lower on smartphone addiction than grade 7 students.
Secondly, smartphone addiction significantly affected sleep duration; in particular, sleep duration was affected by increased tolerance scores meaning that though students tried to control their smartphone use, they were more likely to fail, leading to shorter sleep duration. It was shown that grade 7 students were higher in tolerance, and their sleep duration was shorter than students in grade 4 accordingly. This also shows that students in higher grades, who are higher in tolerance to smartphones get less sleep, and it indicates that tolerance is an important sub-factor to measure smartphone addiction. According to Deniz, when smartphone dependency increases, there is a decrease in sleep duration, and those who are older are at greater risk of smartphone addiction [43]. It was also reported that excessive use of smartphones causes depression and/or anxiety, which may lead to sleep problems [44]. A study conducted in Belgium suggested that one quarter of young people with smartphones experience disturbed sleep patterns [45]. In South Korea, Kim showed that sub-factors of smartphone addiction such as daily life problems, withdrawal symptoms, and loss of control are related to insufficient sleep [46].
Thirdly, gender has a moderating effect in the relationship between withdrawal from smartphones and sleep duration; the higher the degree of withdrawal was, the more rapidly the sleep duration decreased in females. This result is in line with the studies reporting that females are more likely to engage in problematic smartphone use [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. It was also shown in a study conducted in India that smartphone usage was higher for females than males [47]. Furthermore, it was found that a health-promoting lifestyle positively associated with sleep duration and smartphone dependence was a significant predictor of sleep deprivation for female juniors in college [48].
On the other hand, this study analyzed grade 4 and grade 7 students in general, and did not focus specifically on students who are severely addicted to smartphones, so the mean scores of smartphone addiction and its sub-factors are mostly below 2 (Table 2) and the average sleep duration of grade 4 students (9.17 h) and grade 7 students (7.96 h) might not look so problematic. However, as smartphone addiction among children and adolescents is becoming more severe, resulting in increased sleep deprivation among those who are over-dependent on smartphones [5,6], the significant results of this study should be considered seriously.

5. Conclusions

This study is meaningful as it explored the effects of the sub-factors of smartphone addiction on sleep duration in greater depth in relation to gender and age among children and adolescents from a large set of representative national sample data. As smartphone addiction and insufficient sleep affect health adversely, considering the insight of this study would be beneficial.
This study presented the relationships between smartphone addiction and sleep duration with the moderating effects of age and gender, and shed light on tolerance as a main factor that decreases sleep duration for adolescents, and withdrawal as a main factor that affects the sleep duration of females. This study suggests that interventions would be beneficial to prevent smartphone addiction among youth of different ages and genders. It would be more efficient to carry out separate programs for different gender and age groups, considering smartphone addiction sub-factors like tolerance and withdrawal. The behaviors and thought processes that would manifest due to these sub-factors at different stages of development and in different genders would likely require highly targeted and specialized interventions to be resolved successfully.
Specifically, it would be efficient and prudent for schools, society, and governments to provide healthy smartphone usage culture education not only to children and adolescents, but also their parents. In this way, children and adolescents can become aware of the severity of smartphone addiction and its adverse effects at the family and societal levels. Furthermore, when implementing programs for children and adolescents, it may be necessary to focus more on females, as females are more prone to smartphone addiction than males. Smartphone addiction rehab would be also helpful for students who have sleeping problems, providing treatment in more specialized ways. Likewise, more targeted intervention would be more essential for modifying addictive behavior and sleep duration, instead of targeting youth as a whole.
This study had the following limitations and recommendations for future studies. First, as we used secondary data, there was a limitation in the original data, and the students’ ages were restricted to grades 4 and grade 7. More accurate results regarding age could be determined if there were more available data covering a more diverse set of ages. In future studies, collecting data for additional age groups would result in more precise assessments. Second, this study looked at grades 4 and grade 7 without focusing on students who were seriously addicted to smartphones. In order to understand the seriousness of smartphone addiction and sleep duration in depth, focusing on the group which has been most impacted would be efficient for future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.-H.J.; Funding acquisition, J.-Y.Y.; Methodology, K.-H.J.; Project administration, H.J.C.; Resources, K.-H.J.; Supervision, H.J.C.; Writing—original draft, J.-Y.Y., K.-H.J. and H.J.C.; Writing—review & editing, H.J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in https://www.nypi.re.kr/archive/board?menuId=MENU00252.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. History. Stockholm Smartphone. Available online: http://www.stockholmsmartphone.org/history (accessed on 18 October 2018).
  2. Emanuel, R.; Bell, R.; Cotton, C.; Craig, J.; Drummond, D.; Gibson, S.; Harris, A.; Harris, M.; Hatcher Vance, C.; Jones, S.; et al. The truth about smartphone addiction. Coll. Stud. J. 2015, 49, 291–299. [Google Scholar]
  3. Katz, J.E.; Aakhus, M. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. KISDI. Key Contents of 2018 Korea Media Panel Survey; KISDI: Jinchun-gun, Korea, 2019; Volume 19, p. 18. [Google Scholar]
  5. Barun ICT Research Center. 2016 Smartphone Usage Statistics Report Survey Final Report; Yonsei University Barun ICT Research Center: Seoul, Korea, 2017; pp. 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lepp, A.; Barkley, J.E.; Karpinski, A.C. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 31, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ming, Z.; Pietikainen, S.; Hanninen, O. Excessive texting in pathophysiology of first carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Pathophysiology 2006, 13, 269–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Binning, E. How Texting Can Be a Pain in the Neck. The New Zealand Herald. Available online: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10688597 (accessed on 1 October 2019).
  9. Takao, M.; Takahashi, S.; Kitamura, M. Addictive personality and problematic mobile phone use. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 2009, 12, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Turel, O.; Serenko, A. Is mobile email addiction overlooked? Commun. ACM 2010, 53, 41–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Walsh, S.P.; White, K.M.; Hyde, M.K.; Watson, B. Dialling and driving: Factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2008, 40, 1893–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Yen, C.F.; Tang, T.C.; Yen, J.Y.; Lin, H.C.; Huang, C.F.; Liu, S.C.; Ko, C.H. Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan. J. Adolesc. 2009, 32, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bianchi, A.; Phillips, J.G. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology Behav. 2005, 8, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Biglu, M.H.; Ghavami, M. Factors influencing dependence on mobile phone. J. Anal. Res. Clin. Med. 2016, 4, 158–162. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, H. Exercise rehabilitation for smartphone addiction. J. Exerc. Rehabil. 2013, 9, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, Y.H.; Chang, L.R.; Lee, Y.H.; Tseng, H.W.; Kuo, T.B.; Chen, S.H. Development and validation of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lin, Y.H.; Chiang, C.L.; Lin, P.H.; Chang, L.R.; Ko, C.H.; Lee, Y.H.; Lin, S.H. Proposed diagnostic criteria for smartphone addiction. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kim, D.I.; Chung, Y.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, M.C.; Lee, Y.H.; Kang, E.B.; Keum, C.M.; Karin, J.E. Development of Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for Adults: Self-report. Korean J. Couns. 2012, 13, 629–644. [Google Scholar]
  19. Augner, C.; Hacker, G.W. Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters in young adults. Int. J. Public Health 2012, 57, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Billieux, J.; Van der Linden, M.; Rochat, L. The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2008, 22, 1195–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, Y.K.; Chang, C.T.; Lin, Y.; Cheng, Z.H. The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 31, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mok, J.Y.; Choi, S.W.; Kim, D.J.; Choi, J.S.; Lee, J.; Ahn, H.; Choi, E.J.; Song, W.Y. Latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2014, 10, 817–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Şar, A.H.; Ayas, T.; Horzum, M.B. Developing the smartphone addiction scale and its validity and reliability study. Online J. Technol. Addict. Cyberbullying 2015, 2, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schifferstein, H.N.J. The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: A study of self-reports. Acta Psychol. 2006, 121, 41–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Walsh, S.P.; White, K.M.; Cox, S.; Young, R.M. Keeping in constant touch: The predictors of young Australians’ mobile phone involvement. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2011, 27, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Morahan-Martin, J.; Schumacher, P. Incidence and correlates of pathological Internet use among college students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2000, 16, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Öztunç, M. Analysis of problematic mobile phone use, feelings of shyness and loneliness in accordance with several variables. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 106, 456–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Demirci, K.; Orhan, H.; Demirdas, A.; Akpınar, A.; Sert, H. Validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale in a younger population. Bull. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2014, 24, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jun, J.S.; Ko, Y.S.; Um, N.R. 2011 Internet Addiction Survey; National Information Society Agency: Seoul, Korea, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kwon, M.; Lee, J.Y.; Won, W.Y.; Park, J.W.; Min, J.A.; Hahn, C.; Kim, D.J. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56936. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim, D.Y. More than 1 in 4 Middle School Students are Addicted to Smartphones. Available online: http://www.akomnews.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=news&wr_id=39327 (accessed on 12 May 2020).
  32. Bae, S.M. Smartphone addiction of adolescents, not a smart choice. J. Korean Med Sci. 2017, 32, 1563. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sankar, U.G.; Monisha, R. Evaluation of Smartphone Addiction and Quality of Sleep among School Children. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2013, 13, 1409–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Badre, G. Excessive Mobile Use Affects Sleep in Teens. Available online: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080609071402.htm (accessed on 12 May 2020).
  35. Cheung, L.M.; Wong, W.S. The effects of insomnia and Internet addiction on depression in Hong Kong Chinese adolescents: An exploratory cross-sectional analysis. J. Sleep Res. 2011, 20, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Akıllı, G.K.; Gezgin, D.M. Examination of the Relationship between Nomophobia Levels and Different Behavior Patterns of University Students [Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Nomofobi Düzeyleri ile Farklı Davranış Örüntülerinin Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Univ. J. Educ. Fac. 2016, 1, 51–69. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kamibeppu, K.; Sugiura, S. Impact of the mobile phone on junior high-school students’ friendships in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 2005, 8, 215–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lemola, S.; Perkinson-Gloor, N.; Brand, S.; Dewald-Kaufmann, J.F.; Grob, A. Adolescents’ electronic media use at night, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age. J. Youth Adolesc. 2014, 44, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Van den Bulck, J. Adolescent use of mobile phones for calling and for sending text messages after lights out: Results from a prospective cohort study with a one-year follow-up. Sleep 2007, 30, 1220–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Di Stefano, J. How much power is enough? Against the development of an arbitrary convention for statistical power calculations. Funct. Ecol. 2003, 17, 707–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  42. Park, C.; Park, Y.R. The conceptual model on smartphone addiction among early childhood. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2014, 4, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gezgin, D.M. Understanding Patterns for Smartphone Addiction: Age, Sleep Duration, Social Network Use and Fear of Missing Out. Cypriot J. Educ. Sci. 2018, 13, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Demirci, K.; Akgönül, M.; Akpinar, A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J. Behav. Addict. 2015, 4, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Van den Bulck, J. Text messaging as a cause of sleep interruption in adolescents, evidence from a cross-sectional study. J. Sleep Res. 2003, 12, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, B.Y. The Correlations among High School Students’ Internet Game Addiction, Smartphone Addiction, the Lack of Sleep and Stress. Ph.D. Thesis, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  47. Nayak, J.K. Relationship among smartphone usage, addiction, academic performance and the moderating role of gender: A study of higher education students in India. Comput. Educ. 2018, 123, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, S.Y.; Chen, K.L.; Lin, P.H.; Wang, P.Y. Relationships among health-related behaviors, smartphone dependence, and sleep duration in female junior college students. Soc. Health Behav. 2019, 2, 26. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 18 05943 g001 550
Figure 1. Research Model.
Figure 1. Research Model.
Ijerph 18 05943 g001
Ijerph 18 05943 g002 550
Figure 2. Moderating effect analysis result 1.
Figure 2. Moderating effect analysis result 1.
Ijerph 18 05943 g002
Ijerph 18 05943 g003 550
Figure 3. Moderating effect analysis result 2.
Figure 3. Moderating effect analysis result 2.
Ijerph 18 05943 g003
Table
Table 1. Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for Children and Adolescents.
Table 1. Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for Children and Adolescents.
SubdomainItems
Disturbance
of Adaptive
Functions		1. My school grades dropped due to excessive smartphone use
2. I have a hard time doing what I have planned (study, do homework, or go to afterschool classes) due to using smartphone
3. People frequently comment on my excessive smartphone use
4. Family or friends complain that I use my smartphone too much
5. My smartphone does not distract me from my studies
Virtual world
orientation		6. Using a smartphone is more enjoyable than spending time with family or friends
7. When I cannot use a smartphone, I feel like I have lost the entire world
Withdrawal8. It would be painful if I am not allowed to use a smartphone
9. I get restless and nervous when I am without a smartphone
10. I am not anxious even when I am without a smartphone
11. I panic when I cannot use my smartphone
Tolerance12. I try cutting my smartphone usage time, but I fail
13. Even when I think I should stop, I continue to use my smartphone too much
14. Spending a lot of time on my smartphone has become a habit
15. I don’t spend a lot of time using smartphone
Table
Table 2. Differences in the main variables by gender.
Table 2. Differences in the main variables by gender.
VariablesMale (n = 2568)Female (n = 2372)t
MSDMSD
Smartphone addiction1.870.501.860.510.418
Disturbance of adaptive functions2.110.602.080.621.723
Virtual life orientation1.520.611.500.590.873
Withdrawal1.640.571.640.580.020
Tolerance2.200.672.220.72−1.058
Sleep duration8.641.018.451.156.342 ***
Note: n = sample size, M = mean, SD = standard deviation, t = t-value, *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 3. Differences in the main variables by age.
Table 3. Differences in the main variables by age.
VariablesGrade 4 (n = 2399)Grade 7 (n = 2541)t
MSDMSD
Smartphone addiction1.750.501.970.48−16.352 ***
Disturbance of adaptive functions1.970.602.220.58−14.511 ***
Virtual life orientation1.410.571.610.61−11.933 ***
Withdrawal symptoms1.540.561.730.58−11.524 ***
Tolerance2.060.702.340.66−14.407 ***
Sleep duration9.170.817.960.9747.772 ***
Note: n = sample size, M = mean, SD = standard deviation, t = t-value, *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 4. Research model analysis 1.
Table 4. Research model analysis 1.
VariablesBS.E.
Independent variableSmartphone Addiction (A)−0.109 *0.044
Moderator variableGender (B)0.0820.097
Age (C)−1.202 ***0.099
InteractionA × B−0.177 ***0.050
A × C0.0160.051
Constant9.4730.082
R20.336
F(sig.)499.61 ***
Note: B = B-static, S.E = standard error, sig. = significance * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 5. Research model analysis 2.
Table 5. Research model analysis 2.
VariablesBS.E.
Independent variableDisturbance of adaptive functions (A)−0.0480.050
Virtual life orientation (B)0.0080.051
Withdrawl (C)0.0520.055
Tolerance(D)−0.139 **0.042
Moderator variableGender (E)0.0640.099
Age (F)−1.230 ***0.102
InteractionA × E−0.0270.058
B × E−0.0660.059
C × E−0.127 *0.069
D × E−0.0280.051
A × F0.0820.058
B × F−0.0870.059
C × F0.0170.063
D × F−0.0040.051
Constant9.4930.084
R20.338
F(sig.)179.89 ***
Note: B = B-static, S.E = standard error, sig. = significance * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoon, J.-Y.; Jeong, K.-H.; Cho, H.J. The Effects of Children’s Smartphone Addiction on Sleep Duration: The Moderating Effects of Gender and Age. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5943. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115943

AMA Style

Yoon J-Y, Jeong K-H, Cho HJ. The Effects of Children’s Smartphone Addiction on Sleep Duration: The Moderating Effects of Gender and Age. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(11):5943. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115943

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoon, Ji-Yeon, Kyu-Hyoung Jeong, and Heeran J. Cho. 2021. "The Effects of Children’s Smartphone Addiction on Sleep Duration: The Moderating Effects of Gender and Age" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 11: 5943. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115943

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop