Next Article in Journal
Burnout in Intensive Care Unit Workers during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Italian Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Mental Well-Being of Health Care Workers during the Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Nationwide Study in Poland
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Eco-Efficiency Analysis for the Russian Cities along the Northern Sea Route: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach Using an Epsilon-Based Measure Model

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(11), 6097; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116097
by Shuaiyu Yao 1, Mengmeng Chen 2,*, Dmitri Muravev 1,3 and Wendi Ouyang 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(11), 6097; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116097
Submission received: 4 May 2021 / Revised: 31 May 2021 / Accepted: 2 June 2021 / Published: 5 June 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Global review comments

a) Tables/Figures formatting must be improved.

b) The authors must be explain how obtained the data information.

Other comments

Line 154: All acronyms must be clarify in text

Line 225: Section 3 should be improved

Line 240: Equation (2): all variable must be clarified

Line 283: Table 2 must be represented using one page

Line 338: Please clarify “It is clear from Table 4 that the efficiency of capital and public investment of many Russian Arctic cities is relatively low, as 18 out of 28 cities need to have a more-than-50% reduction in both capital and public investment to achieve eco-efficiency.”

Line 439: The Supplementary Materials are not available.

Line 456: Please clarify “The data presented in this study is contained within the article.”

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments are located in the attached file 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

1. The work is exciting and essential to the field.
    2. I have minor considerations to make:
        a. Rewrite the first person pronouns into third person (impersonal form).
        b. Revise reference #35. Consider that there are more recent publications.
        c. Specify the reason for the temporal cut-off being only up to the year 2019.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop