Investigating the Effective Factors of Using Personal Protective Equipment from the Perspective of Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
by
, and
Razieh Mokhtari
1, 
Ali Safdari
2,
Davood Hekmatpou
1,
Ali Sahebi
3,
Siamak Moayedi
4,
Mercedes Torres
4 and
Mohamad Golitaleb
1,* 1
Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak 3819693345, Iran
2
Student Research Committee, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak 3819693345, Iran
3
Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam 6931851147, Iran
4
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(15), 7882; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157882
Submission received: 5 May 2021
/
Revised: 10 July 2021
/
Accepted: 13 July 2021
/
Published: 26 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nursing and COVID-19 Ⅱ)
Abstract
:Considering the importance of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for preventing COVID-19 transmission, the aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the use of PPE from the perspective of the nurses caring for COVID-19 patients. This descriptive cross-sectional study surveyed 240 nurses working in the central COVID-19 hospitals of Arak, Iran. Nurses were enrolled in the study by a convenience sampling method. The data collection tool was a validated questionnaire. Data were analyzed by SPSS 16 software using descriptive statistics, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent sample t-test. Environmental (4.24 ± 0.45), personal (4.16 ± 0.42), and organizational (4.04 ± 0.50) factors all contribute significantly to nursing attitudes about PPE use (p < 0.05). The average score, combining all identified factors, was 4.15 ± 0.31. The most influential factor contributing to appropriate use of PPE was environmental, while the least impactful parameters were related to rules and regulations. Environmental factors have the greatest impact on the use of PPE from the perspective of the nurses caring for patients with COVID-19. Managers and healthcare organizations should provide appropriate and adequate PPE to nurses, educate them on proper use, and monitor the process to resolve barriers.
1. Introduction
The Association of Infection Control and Epidemiology Specialists supports measures to prevent the transmission of the novel coronavirus from patients to healthcare workers (HCWs) [1,2]. Strict adherence to infection prevention guidelines is a critical component of efforts to stop the spread of infectious and contagious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare personnel [2,3]. A study conducted in China showed that approximately one-third of those infected with COVID-19 were HCWs [4]. In Italy, 10% of healthcare providers contracted the virus, 3% of whom died [1]. This highlights the importance of providing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for HCWs in order to prevent transmission in the healthcare environment [5,6].
Nurses are an essential component of the frontline team caring for COVID-19 patients. Their service is vital to the care of the sick and further efforts to end the pandemic [2,7]. The International Council of Nurses has recognized the key role of nurses in the treatment and care of patients with COVID-19 [8]. Considering the highly infectious nature of the disease and the dire consequences of HCW infections for healthcare infrastructure, it is important to pay close attention to the use of PPE [5,8].
The provision of adequate PPE to nurses has been a significant challenge throughout this pandemic. High cost, limited supply, and high rates of consumption have all contributed to PPE shortages experienced by HCWs worldwide. Shortages in PPE have caused great concern among HCWs regarding their safety and protection [8,9].
In a recent review, factors such as low skill, lack of training, insufficient access to PPE, and environmental factors were noted as barriers to the use of PPE by nurses [10]. In addition, personal characteristics including beliefs, attitudes, and values and organizational factors such as communication, training, performance feedback, and acceptance among colleagues or managers have been shown to influence nurses’ rates of compliance with self-protection behaviors [8,10].
Previous studies have demonstrated that nurses who care for patients with a novel infectious disease (such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or H1N1) may be unaware of the most up-to-date information regarding safe patient care and are ill-equipped with PPE [11,12]. The experience of Saudi nurses caring for Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) patients also showed that the nurses lacked adequate knowledge about the disease and were more vulnerable to contracting the virus [12]. Prior to the current COVID-19 pandemic, most recent studies regarding best practices for infection control of HCWs were based on lessons learned during the MERS, SARS, and H1N1 outbreaks [13,14,15]. Nursing compliance with preventive behaviors against respiratory infectious diseases such as SARS and H1N1 has been shown to be influenced by their level of knowledge [16,17], attitudes toward the disease [18], and risk perception [19]. To the best of our knowledge, no study has assessed the impact of individual, organizational, and environmental factors on the use of PPE by nurses caring for patients with COVID-19. We aimed to investigate factors affecting the use of PPE with a focus on nursing perspectives.
2. Methods
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study population consisted of nurses caring for COVID-19 patients in the hospitals affiliated with Arak University of Medical Sciences. All nurses working in the COVID-19 care centers of Valiasr (n = 110) and Ayatollah Khansari (n = 130) hospitals were enrolled via the census sampling method (Figure 1). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the university and researchers obtained the permission of hospital directors and head nurses. The research team visited the target wards, spoke to the nurses individually and in groups, and asked eligible nurses to complete this anonymous questionnaire. This occurred during three working shifts (morning, evening, and night). Participants were assured about the confidentiality of their responses and the voluntary nature of the study. Inclusion criteria were having at least a bachelor’s degree in nursing and at least six months of work experience. The exclusion criterion was an unwillingness to participate. The data collection tool, a paper-based questionnaire, was handed to eligible nurses and placed by the researcher into a folder after completion. The time needed to complete the questionnaire was 10 min. The data were collected from 5 October to 15 November 2020. For confidentiality, the questionnaires were filled out anonymously without any identifying data. The content validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by 10 nursing research experts. The content validity ratio (CVR) and the content validity index (CVI) of the checklist were calculated as 0.71 and 0.94, respectively. Moreover, the total reliability of its items was approved by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88 (0.79 for environmental factors, 0.96 for organizational factors, and 0.90 for individual factors). The reliability was also confirmed based on calculating the correlation coefficient index (0.81) through a test–retest method in a pilot study of 15 nurses with an interval of 10 days.
The questionnaire consisted of two parts. The first part included demographic information (gender, age, marital status, education, position, work experience, and previous attendance at any PPE training workshop). The second part consisted of 26 statements about the environmental (4 questions), organizational (9 questions), and individual (13 questions) factors affecting the respondent’s use of PPE. The statements were scored based on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree = 5, agree = 4, no opinion = 3, disagree = 2, and strongly disagree = 1). Using this 5-point scale, the hypothetical average score of the population was assumed to be 3 (i.e., the middle point = the option of “no opinion”) during data analysis. The mean score of each item and dimension was determined separately and compared with the hypothetical mean. A mean score of higher than 3 was regarded as above the average, while a mean score of less than 3 was considered below the average. To calculate the average score of each category, the scores of all questions were summed up and then divided by the total number of questions in that domain.
The data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 16) using descriptive statistics. The one-way ANOVA test was used to determine any significant differences when comparing the scores of more than two groups, and the independent sample Student t-test was used to examine the mean score differences between two-state variables.
3. Results
Out of 240 distributed questionnaires, 230 were returned, for a response rate of 95.8%. Table 1 shows that 195 nurses (84.4%) were female and 35 (15.2%) were male. Overall, 219 nurses (95.2%) had a bachelor’s degree, and 11 (4.8%) had a master’s degree. Regarding position, the majority of participants (187, 81.3%) were clinical nurses, while only two (0.9%) were supervisors. Most respondents were married (152, 66.1%). The mean duration of work experience was 12.38 ± 6.22 years, and the mean age was 37.23 ± 7.13 years. More than half of the nurses (126, 54.8%) had participated in PPE training workshops.
The factors affecting the use of PPE by nurses participating in this survey were environmental (4.24 ± 0.45), individual (4.16 ± 0.42), and organizational (4.04 ± 0.50), listed in order of expressed importance. The average score for all categories was 4.15 ± 0.31. Considering homogeneous variances and normal distribution based on the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (p < 0.05), the univariate t-test rendered significant results for all of the environmental, organizational, and individual factors (p < 0.05). Therefore, as the observed averages were significantly greater than the hypothetical mean (i.e., 3), these factors were found to have a substantial impact on decision making (Table 2).
After examining the homogeneity of variances using Levene’s test (p < 0.05), a t-test was used to compare the mean scores obtained based on gender, education, marital status, and previous participation in a PPE training workshop (Table 3). Nurses with a bachelor’s degree placed more importance on personal factors contributing to their decisions regarding PPE use when compared with nurses who held a master’s degree, although this difference was not found to be highly significant (p = 0.08). The results of the t-test show that nursing compliance with the use of PPE was significantly associated with female gender (p = 0.05). An increased importance of environmental factors was significantly associated with being married (p < 0.05).
The results of the analysis of variance of the total score after confirming the homogeneity of variances based on Levene’s test (p < 0.05) show that the highest and lowest total mean scores were related to the charge nurse and nurse supervisor positions, with mean scores of 129.80 and 65.50, respectively (Table 4).
4. Discussion
HCWs are at the frontline of fighting COVID-19 and should use PPE to protect themselves against the disease. Conversely, wearing PPE increases their stress and workload [20]. Our results show that environmental factors were the most impactful on nurses’ decisions regarding the use of PPE, while individual preferences carried less weight. A study from Pakistan showed that a lack of availability and inappropriate use of PPE were among the most notable factors contributing to the transmission of COVID-19 disease to HCWs [21]. Furthermore, an Italian study showed that proper education regarding the use of PPE was just as important as providing adequate supplies [22]. Adequate and appropriate access to PPE reduces the incidence of mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety in nurses [23]. Therefore, in addition to access to PPE, HCWs should receive the necessary and appropriate education to use this equipment safely. Our results show a relatively low importance of personal factors, such as knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs, on the use of PPE by nurses. A study in Nepal showed that it is possible to improve attitudes and safety performances by disseminating accurate information about COVID-19 transmission and infection [24,25]. It is likely that increased efforts aimed at educating nurses regarding COVID-19 transmissibility and infection could improve their attitudes toward, and compliance with, recommended PPE use.
Organizational factors also affected nurses’ attitudes toward PPE to some degree. Healthcare organizations should consider continuously training their personnel to use PPE as a part of their COVID-19 pandemic response programs [26]. Furthermore, Delgado et al. showed that supporting HCWs should be among the strategic priorities of healthcare systems during this pandemic [27]. Ahmed et al. also showed that providing HCWs with PPE is essential, and hospital managers and governments should implement measures to guarantee their access [28]. Overall, our study showed that the factors that had the greatest impact on the views of the nurses caring for patients with COVID-19 regarding the use of personal protective equipment were as follows: environmental factors such as availability of PPE, lack of barriers to safe work practices, and cleanliness and order of the workplace; organizational factors such as feedback from supervisors and safety officers regarding the use of PPE, providing constructive and continuous education to nurses on the use of PPE, addressing staff shortages, implementing quarantine and isolation policies, limiting time for patient care, and high work pressure and workload; personal factors such as believing in the effectiveness of PPE, perception of the organization’s safety requirements, the impact of mental norms on the use of PPE, knowledge of coronavirus transmission routes, knowing how to use PPE, understanding the risk of contracting the COVID-19, and setting an example for colleagues by using PPE.(Table 5).
Ultimately, healthcare systems have an important role in maintaining an adequate supply of PPE for nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. If this role is neglected, organizations face declining quality of care, increased risk to staff, worsening levels of burnout, and an overall compromise in their efficiency and performance.
5. Limitations
A limitation of our study was the relatively low sample size. This can potentially reduce the generalizability of the results. One way to address this would be to pursue larger, multicenter studies in the future. In addition, if respondents were concerned regarding the confidentiality of their answers, they may have provided answers that were less critical of their workplace or organization. This may have altered the results to show a greater support for the use of PPE than in actual practice. This may also have resulted in less critique of the provision and organizational support for PPE than truly experienced. Counteracting this effect, however, may also be a concern for stigma against personal beliefs that conflict with hospital policy, therefore making participants less likely to express their personal beliefs if at odds with those of the organization. Finally, the cross-sectional design of the study may limit our results.
6. Conclusions
Environmental factors had the greatest impact on the use of PPE from the perspective of the nurses caring for COVID-19 patients. Managers and healthcare organizations should provide appropriate and adequate PPE to nurses, educate them on proper use, and monitor the process to resolve barriers.
Author Contributions
R.M. conceptualized the study with support from M.G., A.S. (Ali Safdari), D.H., S.M., M.T. and A.S. (Ali Sahebi). R.M., A.S. (Ali Safdari) and M.G. extracted the data for this study. R.M. cleaned and analyzed the data with support from A.S. (Ali Sahebi). And M.G., S.M., M.T. and D.H. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to writing and finalizing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the COVID-19 Research Center (3627) and the Research Ethics Committee (IR.ARAKMU.REC.1399.092) of Arak University of Medical Sciences.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
We would like to offer our special thanks to the nurses for their cooperation in this study during the harsh conditions under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Cao, Y.; Li, Q.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; Miao, C.; Yang, H.; Chen, Z.; Li, C.; Li, L. Hospital Emergency Management Plan During the COVID-19 Epidemic. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020, 27, 309–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choi, J.S.; Kim, K.M. Crisis Prevention and Management by Infection Control Nurses During the Middle East Respiratory Coro-Navirus Outbreak in Korea. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2016, 44, 480–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jenkins, E.K.; McAuliffe, C.; Hirani, S.; Richardson, C.; Thomson, K.C.; McGuinness, L.; Morris, J.; Kousoulis, A.; Gadermann, A. A Portrait of the Early and Differential Mental Health Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada: Findings from the First Wave of a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey. Prev. Med. 2021, 145, 106333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saha, S.; Dutta, D. A Study on the Psychological Crisis During the Lockdown Caused Due to Covid-19 Pandemic. Afr. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 3, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
- Mokhtari, R.; Moayedi, S.; Golitaleb, M. COVID-19 Pandemic and Health Anxiety Among Nurses of Intensive Care Units. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2020, 29, 1275–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Greene, J.; Gibson, D.M. Workers at Long-Term Care Facilities and Their Risk for Severe COVID-19 Illness. Prev. Med. 2021, 143, 106328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Qin, W.; Wang, Z.; Yang, F. Factors Influencing Social Distancing to Prevent the Community Spread of COVID-19 Among Chinese Adults. Prev. Med. 2021, 143, 106385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millar, R.C. Nursing a Patient With Covid-19 Infection. Tasman. Med. J. 2020, 1, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, J.-S.; Kim, J.-S. Factors Influencing Preventive Behavior Against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus Among Nursing Students in South Korea. Nurse Educ. Today 2016, 40, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, D.; Gamage, B.; Bryce, E.; Copes, R.; Yassi, A. Protecting Health Care Workers from SARS and Other Respiratory Pathogens: Organizational and Individual Factors That Affect Adherence to Infection Control Guidelines. Am. J. Infect. Control 2005, 33, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.; Lee, O. Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Nurses on Personal Protective Equipment: Response to the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. J. Korean Acad. Fundam. Nurs. 2016, 23, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khalid, I.; Khalid, T.J.; Qabajah, M.R.; Barnard, A.G.; Qushmaq, I.A. Healthcare Workers Emotions, Perceived Stressors and Coping Strategies During a MERS-CoV Outbreak. Clin. Med. Res. 2016, 14, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cowling, B.J.; Park, M.; Fang, V.J.; Wu, P.; Leung, G.M.; Wu, J.T. Preliminary Epidemiological Assessment of MERS-CoV Outbreak in South Korea, May to June 2015. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20, 21163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hall, A.J.; Tokars, J.I.; Badreddine, S.A.; Bin Saad, Z.; Furukawa, E.; Al Masri, M.; Haynes, L.M.; Gerber, S.I.; Kuhar, D.T.; Miao, C.; et al. Health Care Worker Contact With MERS Patient, Saudi Arabia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 2148–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.; Lee, E.; Ryu, Y.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H.; Lee, H.; Yi, S.J. Epidemiological Investigation of MERS-CoV Spread in a Single Hospital in South Korea, May to June 2015. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20, 21169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gautret, P.; Benkouiten, S.; Salaheddine, I.; Belhouchat, K.; Drali, T.; Parola, P.; Brouqui, P. Hajj pilgrims’ Knowledge about Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus, August to September 2013. Eurosurveillance 2013, 18, 20604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, M.U.; Shah, S.; Ahmad, A.; Fatokun, O. Knowledge and Attitude of Healthcare Workers about Middle East Respiratory Syn-Drome in Multispecialty Hospitals of Qassim, Saudi Arabia. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Choi, J.-S.; Yang, N.-Y. Perceived Knowledge, Attitude, and Compliance With Preventive Behavior on Influenza A (H1N1) by University Students. Korean J. Adult Nurs. 2010, 22, 250–259. [Google Scholar]
- Brug, J.; Aro, A.R.; Oenema, A.; De Zwart, O.; Richardus, J.H.; Bishop, G.D. SARS Risk Perception, Knowledge, Precautions, and in-Formation Sources, The Netherlands. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudhury, A.; Singh, M.; Khurana, D.K.; Mustafi, S.M.; Sharma, S. Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study. Indian J. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 24, 1169–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ali, S.; Noreen, S.; Farooq, I.; Bugshan, A.; Vohra, F. Risk Assessment of Healthcare Workers at the Frontline Against COVID-19. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 36 (COVID19-S4), S99–S103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savoia, E.; Argentini, G.; Gori, D.; Neri, E.; Piltch-Loeb, R.; Fantini, M.P. Factors Associated With Access and Use of PPE During COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study of Italian Physicians. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arnetz, J.E.; Goetz, C.M.; Sudan, S.; Arble, E.; Janisse, J.; Arnetz, B.B. Personal Protective Equipment and Mental Health Symptoms Among Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2020, 62, 892–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alao, M.A.; Durodola, A.O.; Ibrahim, O.; Asinobi, O.A. Assessment of Health Workers’ Knowledge, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Prevention of COVID-19 Infection in Low-Resource Settings. Adv. Public Health 2020, 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nepal, R.; Sapkota, K.; Adhikari, K.; Paudel, P.; Adhikari, B.; Paudyal, N.; Sapkota, K.; Nepal, R. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers in Chitwan, Nepal. J. Chitwan Med. Coll. 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piché-Renaud, P.-P.; Groves, H.E.; Kitano, T.; Arnold, C.; Thomas, A.; Streitenberger, L.; Alexander, L.; Morris, S.K.; Science, M. Healthcare Worker Perception of a Global Outbreak of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Personal Protective Equipment: Survey of a Pediatric Tertiary-Care Hospital. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2021, 42, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgado, D.; Quintana, F.W.; Perez, G.; Liprandi, A.S.; Ponte-Negretti, C.; Mendoza, I.; Baranchuk, A. Personal Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Realities and Perspectives of Healthcare Workers in Latin America. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ahmed, J.; Malik, F.; Bin Arif, T.; Majid, Z.; A Chaudhary, M.; Ahmad, J.; Malik, M.; Khan, T.M.; Khalid, M. Availability of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Among US and Pakistani Doctors in COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus 2020, 12, e8550. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the selection of study based on STROBE.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of study participants.
| Variables | N (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 195 (84.8%) |
| Male | 35 (15.2%) | |
| Education | Bachelor’s degree | 219 (95.2%) |
| Master’s degree | 11 (4.8%) | |
| Marital status | Single | 78 (33.9%) |
| Married | 152 (66.1%) | |
| Previous participation in PPE training workshops | Yes | 126 (54.8%) |
| No | 104 (45.2%) | |
| Position | Nurse | 187 (81.3%) |
| Shift’s chief | 32 (13.9%) | |
| Head nurse | 9 (3.9%) | |
| Supervisor | 2 (0.9%) | |
| Age in years (mean ± SD) | 37.23 ± 7.13 | |
| Work experience in years (mean ± SD) | 12.38 ± 6.22 | |
Table 2.
Univariate t-test for the mean score of the factors affecting nursing compliance with the use of PPE (cut off point = 3).
Table 2.
Univariate t-test for the mean score of the factors affecting nursing compliance with the use of PPE (cut off point = 3).
| Dimensions | Mean | SD | p | T | df | Deviation from Hypothetical Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental factors | 4.24 | 0.45 | 0.001 | 41.48 | 229 | 1.24 |
| Organizational factors | 4.04 | 0.50 | 0.001 | 31.38 | 229 | 1.04 |
| Personal factors | 4.16 | 0.42 | 0.001 | 41.07 | 229 | 1.16 |
| All Categories | 4.15 | 0.31 | 0.001 | 56.18 | 229 | 1.15 |
Table 3.
Comparison of the mean scores of the factors affecting nurses’ compliance with using PPE based on gender, marital status, education, and previous participation in a PPE workshop.
Table 3.
Comparison of the mean scores of the factors affecting nurses’ compliance with using PPE based on gender, marital status, education, and previous participation in a PPE workshop.
| Variables | Environmental Factors | Organizational Factors | Personal Factors | Average of All Factors | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 4.24 ± 0.44 | 4.04 ± 0.48 | 4.17 ± 0.42 | 4.15 ± 0.30 |
| Male | 4.24 ± 0.53 | 4.08 ± 0.60 | 4.06 ± 0.42 | 4.13 ± 0.35 | |
| p * | 0.13 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.05 | |
| Education | Bachelor | 4.23 ± 0.45 | 4.04 ± 0.50 | 4.17 ± 0.42 | 4.14 ± 0.31 |
| Master | 4.56 ± 0.31 | 4.18 ± 0.62 | 3.94 ± 0.48 | 4.23 ± 0.32 | |
| p * | 0.16 | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.38 | |
| Marital Status | Single | 4.15 ± 0.47 | 4.07 ± 0.48 | 4.20 ± 0.39 | 4.14 ± 0.30 |
| Married | 4.29 ± 0.43 | 4.03 ± 0.51 | 4.13 ± 0.44 | 4.15 ± 0.31 | |
| p * | 0.02 | 0.55 | 0.22 | 0.84 | |
| Participation in PPE workshop | Yes | 4.28 ± 0.44 | 4.08 ± 0.47 | 4.19 ± 0.41 | 4.18 ± 0.29 |
| No | 4.19 ± 0.46 | 4.00 ± 0.53 | 4.10 ± 0.32 | 4.10 ± 0.32 | |
| p * | 0.95 | 0.60 | 0.16 | 0.70 | |
* Independent t-test.
Table 4.
The mean scores of the factors affecting the compliance of nurses with using PPE according to the nurses’ positions.
Table 4.
The mean scores of the factors affecting the compliance of nurses with using PPE according to the nurses’ positions.
| Position | Mean | SD | Mean of Degree | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nurse | 4.14 | 0.29 | 113.77 | 0.59 |
| Shift’s chief | 4.22 | 0.40 | 129.80 | |
| Head nurse | 4.14 | 0.21 | 111.67 | |
| Supervisor | 3.98 | 0.18 | 65.50 | |
| p = 0.13 | Df1 = 3 | Df2 = 226 | F = 1.88 | |
Table 5.
Frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation of nurses’ responses to the factors affecting the use of personal protective equipment.
Table 5.
Frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation of nurses’ responses to the factors affecting the use of personal protective equipment.
| Number | Factor Impacting the Use of PPE | High and Very High | Moderate | Low and Very Low | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The availability of PPE | 215 (93.5%) | 15 (6.5%) | 0 | 4.53 | 0.61 |
| 2 | The lack of barriers to safe work practices | 210 (91.3%) | 17 (7.4%) | 3 (1.3%) | 4.31 | 0.66 |
| 3 | The cleanliness and order of the workplace | 204 (88.8%) | 21 (9.1%) | 5 (2.1%) | 4.33 | 0.75 |
| 4 | The patient’s clinical course deterioration | 146 (63.7%) | 72 (31.1%) | 12 (5.2%) | 3.79 | 0.86 |
| 5 | The support of managers about the implementation of safety procedures | 152 (66.1%) | 63 (27.4%) | 15 (6.5%) | 3.76 | 0.88 |
| 6 | Feedback from supervisors and safety officers regarding the use of PPE | 168 (73%) | 48 (20.9%) | 14 (6.1%) | 3.90 | 0.90 |
| 7 | Providing constructive and continuous education to nurses on the use of PPE | 190 (82.6%) | 36 (15.7%) | 4 (1.7%) | 4.20 | 0.76 |
| 8 | Staff shortage for patient care | 188 (81.7%) | 36 (15.7%) | 6 (2.6%) | 4.10 | 0.77 |
| 9 | Managers’ expectations on the use of PPE | 178 (77.4%) | 34 (14.8%) | 18 (7.8%) | 4.00 | 1.04 |
| 10 | The impact of the workplace prevailing safety practices on using PPE | 189 (82.2%) | 34 (14.8%) | 7 (3%) | 4.09 | 0.80 |
| 11 | Implementing quarantine and isolation policies | 194 (84.7%) | 30 (12.7%) | 6 (2.6%) | 4.12 | 0.76 |
| 12 | Limited time for patient care | 192 (83.4%) | 29 (12.7%) | 9 (3.9%) | 4.13 | 0.80 |
| 13 | High work pressure and workload | 191 (83.1%) | 27 (11.7%) | 12 (5.2%) | 4.09 | 0.85 |
| 14 | Believing in the effectiveness of PPE to prevent infectious disease, such as COVID-19 transmission | 208 (90.5%) | 16 (6.9%) | 6 (2.6%) | 4.26 | 0.72 |
| 15 | Perception of the organization’s safety requirements | 209 (91%) | 17 (7.3%) | 4 (1.7%) | 4.22 | 0.69 |
| 16 | The impact of mental norms on the use of PPE | 215 (93.5%) | 12 (5.2%) | 3 (1.3%) | 4.32 | 0.65 |
| 17 | Having knowledge of coronavirus transmission routes | 212 (92.3) | 11 (4.7%) | 7(3%) | 4.29 | 0.71 |
| 18 | Knowing how to use PPE | 211 (91.8%) | 15(6.5%) | 4 (1.7%) | 4.27 | 0.66 |
| 19 | Understanding the risk of contracting the COVID-19 | 208 (90.5%) | 22 (9.5%) | 0 | 4.29 | 0.63 |
| 20 | Believing in a reduction in the quality of patient–nurse communication when using PPE | 165 (71.7%) | 42 (18.3%) | 23 (10%) | 3.89 | 0.97 |
| 21 | Believing in a reduction of agility in patient care when using PPE | 183 (79.6%) | 38 (16.5%) | 9 (3.9%) | 4.06 | 0.79 |
| 22 | Previous infection of self, or colleague, with the coronavirus or other infectious diseases | 207 (11.8%) | 20 (86.9%) | 3 (1.3%) | 4.23 | 0.65 |
| 23 | Setting an example for colleagues by using PPE | 208 (90.5%) | 21 (9.1%) | 1 (0.4%) | 4.28 | 0.64 |
| 24 | Patients’ expectations about nurses using PPE | 172 (74.9%) | 45 (19.5%) | 13 (5.6%) | 4.02 | 0.87 |
| 25 | A positive attitude toward the protective effect of PPE | 206 (89.6%) | 24 (10.4%) | 0 | 4.21 | 0.61 |
| 26 | Valuing personal judgment over organizational policies | 138 (60.1%) | 67 (29.1%) | 25 (10.8%) | 3.68 | 0.94 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Mokhtari, R.; Safdari, A.; Hekmatpou, D.; Sahebi, A.; Moayedi, S.; Torres, M.; Golitaleb, M. Investigating the Effective Factors of Using Personal Protective Equipment from the Perspective of Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157882
AMA Style
Mokhtari R, Safdari A, Hekmatpou D, Sahebi A, Moayedi S, Torres M, Golitaleb M. Investigating the Effective Factors of Using Personal Protective Equipment from the Perspective of Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(15):7882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157882
Chicago/Turabian StyleMokhtari, Razieh, Ali Safdari, Davood Hekmatpou, Ali Sahebi, Siamak Moayedi, Mercedes Torres, and Mohamad Golitaleb. 2021. "Investigating the Effective Factors of Using Personal Protective Equipment from the Perspective of Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 15: 7882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157882
APA StyleMokhtari, R., Safdari, A., Hekmatpou, D., Sahebi, A., Moayedi, S., Torres, M., & Golitaleb, M. (2021). Investigating the Effective Factors of Using Personal Protective Equipment from the Perspective of Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157882
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
