Next Article in Journal
Psychiatry in the Digital Age: A Blessing or a Curse?
Previous Article in Journal
Psychological Morbidity among University Students in Hong Kong (2014–2018): Psychometric Properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) and Related Correlates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of the Barthel Index to Assess Activities of Daily Living before and after SARS-COVID 19 Infection of Institutionalized Nursing Home Patients
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Personal Tools and Psychosocial Resources of Resilient Gender-Based Violence Women

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(16), 8306; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168306
by Rebeca García Montes 1, Inmaculada Corral Liria 1,*, Raquel Jimenez Fernandez 1, Rocío Rodriguez Vázquez 1, Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo 2 and Marta Losa Iglesias 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(16), 8306; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168306
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 30 July 2021 / Published: 5 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nursing and Society)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The subject of the paper and the research itself are highly significant and they merit special attention and support. The authors stated clearly the data collection process, and the data itself appears to be well organized. Yet, there is a suspicion of a methodological gap. Although the strategy for data analysis is anchored into the seven steps of Paul F. Colaizzi’s method of descriptive phenomenology, the authors ommitted to state if they followed the bracketing process in the formulation of meaning; something that makes the selection and interpretation of data subject to bias. Nevertheless, the paper makes a strong case for theoretical soundness, and it is worth publishing without any reservation. 

Reviewer 2 Report

Nothing to mention
Back to TopTop