Next Article in Journal
Soil Organic Matter Responses to Mangrove Restoration: A Replanting Experience in Northeast Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Applying Customer Journey Mapping in Social Marketing to Understand Salt-Related Behaviors in Cooking. A Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
“One of My Basic Necessities of Life Is Work. That’s Just Broken Away.”—Explorative Triangulation of Personal and Work-Related Impacts for Supervisors and Disabled Employees in German Social Firms during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Social Marketing Intervention to Improve Treatment Adherence in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Self-Efficacy Mediates the Effect of Framing Eating Disorders Prevention Message on Intentions to Have a Sufficient Weight: A Pilot Study

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(17), 8980; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178980 (registering DOI)
by Agnès Helme-Guizon 1,*, Marie-Laure Gavard-Perret 1, Rebecca Shankland 2 and Valentin Flaudias 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(17), 8980; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18178980 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 June 2021 / Revised: 30 July 2021 / Accepted: 3 August 2021 / Published: 26 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Marketing’s Contribution to Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. The study is good. I suggest some modifications to the title.
  2. What is your sampling method?
  3. How did you come up with 233 participants?
  4. Do you have inclusion and exclusion criteria?
  5. What is the study period for each participant? Need to be mentioned.
  6. Your result indicated that a loss-framed message was more persuasive, in terms of intentions to reach or maintain sufficient weight than a gain-framed message in the context of ED prevention aiming at reducing restrained eating in the first-year university student women. Why? Could you justify it?
  7. I suggest re-writing of the conclusion part.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached detailed comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you so much for going through all the comments.

Author Response

We thank reviewer 1 for appreciating the improvements made to the manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached summary.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop