Rasch Analysis of Self-Reported Adherence to Patient-Centered Physical Therapy Scale among Japanese Physical Therapists: Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design
2.2. Participants
2.3. Outcomes
2.4. Procedures
3. Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Research Agenda
4.2. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kinmonth, A.L.; Woodcock, A.; Griffin, S.; Spiegal, N.; Campbell, M.J. Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: Impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. BMJ 1998, 317, 1202–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kinnersley, P.; Stott, N.; Peters, T.; Harvey, I. The patient-centredness of consultations and outcome in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pr. 1999, 49, 711–716. [Google Scholar]
- Rathert, C.; Wyrwich, M.D.; Boren, S.A. Patient-centered care and outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Med. Care Res. Rev. 2013, 70, 351–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McMillan, S.S.; Kendall, E.; Sav, A.; King, M.A.; Whitty, J.A.; Kelly, F.; Wheeler, A.J. Patient-centered approaches to health care: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Med. Care Res. Rev. 2013, 70, 567–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Dulmen, S.A.; Lukersmith, S.; Muxlow, J.; Santa Mina, E.; Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M.W.; van der Wees, P.J.; on behalf of the G-I-N Allied Health Steering Group. Supporting a person-centred approach in clinical guidelines. A position paper of the Allied Health Community—Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). Health Expect. 2015, 18, 1543–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Hammond, R.; Stenner, R.; Palmer, S. What matters most: A qualitative study of person-centered physiotherapy practice in community rehabilitation. Physiother. Theory Pr. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mudge, S.; Stretton, C.; Kayes, N. Are physiotherapists comfortable with person-centred practice? An autoethnographic insight. Disabil. Rehabil. 2014, 36, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hall, A.J.; Burrows, L.; Lang, I.A.; Endacott, R.; Goodwin, V.A. Are physiotherapists employing person-centred care for people with dementia? An exploratory qualitative study examining the experiences of people with dementia and their carers. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shand, L.; Higgins, R.; Murphy, B.; Jackson, A. Development and validation of the healthcare providers patient-activation scale. Patient Educ. Couns. 2019, 102, 1550–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, E.B.; Brownson, C.A.; O’Toole, M.L.; Shetty, G.; Anwuri, V.V.; Glasgow, R.E. Ecological Approaches to Self-Management: The Case of Diabetes. Am. J. Public Health 2005, 95, 1523–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miyamoto, S.; Takasaki, H. Cross-cultural adaptation to Japanese of the Healthcare Providers Patient-Activation Scale. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2020, 32, 810–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takasaki, H. Content validity and reliability of the modified Japanese version of the Healthcare Providers Patient-Activation Scale: Self-reported Adherence to Patient-centered Physical Therapy Scale. Physiothe Theory Pract. In press.
- Simms, L.J.; Zelazny, K.; Williams, T.F.; Bernstein, L. Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data. Psychol. Assess. 2019, 31, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takasaki, H.; Saiki, T.; Iwasada, Y. McKenzie Therapists Adhere More to Evidence-Based Guidelines and Have a More Biopsychosocial Perspective on the Management of Patients with Low Back Pain than General Physical Therapists in Japan. Open J. Ther. Rehabil. 2014, 2, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fernández-Domínguez, J.C.; De Pedro-Gómez, J.E.; Morales-Asencio, J.M.; Bennasar-Veny, M.; Sastre-Fullana, P.; Sesé-Abad, A. Health Sciences-Evidence Based Practice questionnaire (HS-EBP) for measuring transprofessional evidence-based practice: Creation, development and psychometric validation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Domínguez, J.C.; Sesé-Abad, A.; Morales-Asencio, J.M.; Sastre-Fullana, P.; Pol-Castañeda, S.; De Pedro-Gómez, J.E. Content validity of a health science evidence-based practice questionnaire (HS-EBP) with a web-based modified Delphi approach. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2016, 28, 764–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bond, T.G.; Fox, C.M. Applying the Rasch Model.: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Terwee, C.B.; Prinsen, C.A.C.; Chiarotto, A.; Westerman, M.J.; Patrick, D.L.; Alonso, J.; Bouter, L.; De Vet, H.C.W.; Mokkink, L.B. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Qual. Life Res. 2018, 27, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mokkink, L.B.; De Vet, H.C.W.; Prinsen, C.A.C.; Patrick, D.L.; Alonso, J.; Bouter, L.; Terwee, C.B. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual. Life Res. 2018, 27, 1171–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pedhazur, E.J. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction, 3rd ed.; Harcourt Brace College Publishers: Fort Worth, TX, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Takasaki, H.; Chien, C.-W.; Johnston, V.; Treleaven, J.; Jull, G. Validity and Reliability of the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire to Assess Cognitive Symptoms in People With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012, 93, 1774–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takasaki, H.; Treleaven, J. Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in people with chronic neck pain. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2013, 94, 1328–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takasaki, H.; Johnston, V.; Treleaven, J.; Jull, G. Neck Pain Driving Index: Appropriateness of the Rating Scale and Unidimensionality of the Strategic, Tactical, and Operational Levels. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2013, 94, 1842–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takasaki, H.; Hall, T. A Japanese version of the Patient Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Physiother Theory Pr. 2020, 36, 1438–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andresen, E.M. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000, 81, S15–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miki, T.; Kondo, Y.; Takebayashi, T.; Takasaki, H. Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, K.; Takasaki, H. Ability of Therapists Trained in Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy to Guess Pain Catastrophizing and Kinesiophobia Scores for Patients with Low Back Pain. Open J. Ther. Rehabil. 2020, 08, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, D.S.; Notz, W.; Fligner, M.A. The Basic Practice of Statistics; W.H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Beetsma, A.J.; Reezigt, R.R.; Paap, D.; Reneman, M.F. Assessing future health care practitioners’ knowledge and attitudes of musculoskeletal pain; development and measurement properties of a new questionnaire. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pr. 2020, 50, 102236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catley, M.J.; O’Connell, N.E.; Moseley, G.L. How good is the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire? A Rasch analysis of psychometric properties. J. Pain. 2013, 14, 818–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takasaki, H.; Kikkawa, K.; Chiba, H.; Handa, Y.; Sesé-abad, A.; Fernández-domínguez, J.C. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Sciences Evidence-based Practice Questionnaire into Japanese and its test–retest reliability in undergraduate students. Prog. Rehabil. Med. 2021, 6, 20210034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takasaki, H. Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy enhances attitude towards self-management in people with musculoskeletal disorders: A preliminary evidence with a before-after design. SAGE Open Med. 2017, 5, 2050312117740986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murray, A.; Hall, A.; Williams, G.C.; McDonough, S.M.; Ntoumanis, N.; Taylor, I.; Jackson, B.; Copsey, B.; Hurley, D.A.; Matthews, J. Assessing physiotherapists’ communication skills for promoting patient autonomy for self-management: Reliability and validity of the communication evaluation in rehabilitation tool. Disabil. Rehabil. 2019, 41, 1699–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takasaki, H.; Elkins, M.R.; Moseley, A.M. Use of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) in Japan. Phys. Ther. Res. 2016, 19, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Variables | Rasch Analysis (n = 110) | Regression Modeling (n = 85) |
---|---|---|
Age (years), mean ± SD | 32.5 ± 7.2 | 32.7 ± 7.1 |
Sex (no. of males to no. of females) | 85:25 | 68:17 |
Final academic degree (n), [%] | ||
Doctorate | 3 [2.7] | 3 [3.5] |
Master’s | 17 [15.5] | 15 [17.6] |
Bachelor | 53 [48.2] | 38 [44.7] |
Diploma | 37 [33.6] | 29 [34.1] |
Years since the acquisition of the physical therapy license (years), mean ± SD | 9.4 ± 6.0 | 9.8 ± 6.0 |
Item No.1 | Measure | SE | Infit MnSq | Infit Zstd | Outfit MsSq | Outfit Zstd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item 20 | 0.42 | 0.07 | 1.03 | 0.3 | 1.05 | 0.4 |
Item 38 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 1.14 | 1.0 | 1.08 | 0.6 |
Item 11 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 1.04 | 0.4 | 1.05 | 0.4 |
Item 9 | −0.07 | 0.07 | 0.90 | −0.7 | 0.87 | −0.9 |
Item 5 | −0.15 | 0.07 | 0.82 | −1.3 | 0.86 | −1.0 |
Item 34 | −0.15 | 0.07 | 1.05 | 0.4 | 0.96 | −0.2 |
Item 8 | −0.30 | 0.07 | 1.07 | 0.5 | 0.95 | −0.3 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficients (B) (95% Confidence Intervals) | Standardized Coefficients (β) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
(Constant) | 50.63 (36.14–65.12) | <0.001 | |
Sex 1 | −5.16 (−11.72–1.42) | −0.15 | 0.123 |
Final academic degree 2 | 7.58 (0.43–14.74) | 0.20 | 0.038 |
Age | 0.28 (−0.11–0.67) | 0.14 | 0.154 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Takasaki, H. Rasch Analysis of Self-Reported Adherence to Patient-Centered Physical Therapy Scale among Japanese Physical Therapists: Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910282
Takasaki H. Rasch Analysis of Self-Reported Adherence to Patient-Centered Physical Therapy Scale among Japanese Physical Therapists: Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(19):10282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910282
Chicago/Turabian StyleTakasaki, Hiroshi. 2021. "Rasch Analysis of Self-Reported Adherence to Patient-Centered Physical Therapy Scale among Japanese Physical Therapists: Cross-Sectional Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 19: 10282. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910282