Next Article in Journal
Aberrant Mechanical Efficiency during Exercise Relates to Metabolic Health and Exercise Intolerance in Adolescents with Obesity
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Knowledge and Use Practices of Plastic Food Packaging among Young Adults in South Africa: Concerns about Chemicals and Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cesium in Biology, Pancreatic Cancer, and Controversy in High and Low Radiation Exposure Damage—Scientific, Environmental, Geopolitical, and Economic Aspects
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Transfer of Natural Radionuclides in Terrestrial Food Chains—A Review of Investigations in Finland

by
Susanna Salminen-Paatero
1,2,* and
Jussi Paatero
1
1
Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 55, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(20), 10577; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010577
Submission received: 8 September 2021 / Revised: 4 October 2021 / Accepted: 6 October 2021 / Published: 9 October 2021

Abstract

:
Transfer of natural radionuclides 210Pb, 210Po, 238U, and 228,230,232Th in subarctic food chains has been studied in Finland since the 1960s. The unique food chain lichen-reindeer-man related to Sami people in Finnish Lapland and other food chain options, from berries or mushrooms to man, have been explored and the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides in biological samples determined. The results from Finnish radioecological studies are summarized and differences in bioaccumulation between different radionuclides are discussed. It was found out that, although a substantial amount of activity concentration data exist from the research projects executed in Finland during the last 6 decades, more data, especially from U and Th, in biological environment and humans would be useful, e.g., for modeling purposes and for improved assessment of bioaccumulation and adverse effects (both radiological and chemical) of radionuclides.

1. Introduction

Following the atmospheric nuclear tests in the 1950s and early 1960s, several radioecological research projects focusing on the (sub)arctic food-chain lichen-reindeer/caribou-man were initiated in Scandinavia and North America [1,2,3]. Lichen collects deposited radionuclides efficiently and is the main fodder for reindeer during the winter season. The enrichment of radionuclides in this food chain can lead to exceptionally high body burdens among the indigenous Sami and Inuit populations consuming large quantities of the meat and edible organs of reindeer and caribou. This concerns both artificial and natural radionuclides, even though the first research projects dealt with 137Cs and other fission product nuclides. However, it was observed that the natural radionuclides 210Pb and 210Po are enriched in this food chain as well.
210Pb is formed in the atmosphere from the radioactive noble gas 222Rn, emanating from the Earth’s crust. In total, 99% of the airborne 222Rn originates from land and only 1% from the sea [4], and consequently high 210Pb concentrations are found in continental air masses. Owing to the long half-life of 210Pb (t½ = 22.3 a), its removal from the atmosphere is governed by the wet and dry deposition processes affecting the aerosol particles carrying it rather than radioactive decay. 210Pb decays to 210Po (t½ = 138.4 d) via the short-lived beta emitter 210Bi (t½ = 5.013 d). Being an alpha emitter 210Po is highly radiotoxic.
From the radiation protection point of view, less important natural radionuclides are 238U, 226Ra, 40K, and Th isotopes. However, 238U is a long-lived (t½ = 4.5 × 109 a) alpha emitter whose chemical toxicity exceeds its radiological toxicity. Although isotope 238U is not considered to cause significant radiation exposure, it is still the mother nuclide of a whole uranium decay series, producing isotopes of astatine, bismuth, lead, polonium, protactinium, radium, radon, thallium, and thorium while decaying. 40K also has a very long half-life (t½ = 1.28 × 109 a). A human body has a 40K whole body content of a few kBqs. The alpha emitter 226Ra (t½ = 1600 a) is an important radionuclide considering ingested radiation doses. However, the population in Finland receives exposure to 226Ra mainly via uptake from drinking water, and there is hardly any published data about 226Ra in terrestrial environment and biota in Finland, except 226Ra concentration in cereals [5], animal-based food products [6], and timber [7]. Therefore, 226Ra is left outside the scope of this article. Thorium has several isotopes with widely different half-lives. The longest half-life belongs to isotope 232Th (t½ = 1.405 × 1010 a). Owing to the long half-life, the specific activity of 232Th is low and thus its potential threat against human health might be due to its chemical characteristics (heavy metal) rather than radiological hazards.
The main aim of this literature review is to summarize the obtained data concerning natural radionuclides in the food-chains lichen-reindeer-man, mushroom/vegetation-reindeer-man, and mushroom/vegetation-man in Finnish Lapland (northern Finland), and some supporting data is included. A large amount of historical environmental radioactivity data was published only in reports with limited availability. Therefore, it is feasible to collect old and newer research data of natural radionuclides in terrestrial environment in Finland into this single review. A corresponding literature review about transuranium radionuclides in the subarctic food chains in Finland has been published previously [8].

2. 210Pb and 210Po

According to Paatero et al. [9], the 210Pb deposition in northern Finland is about 20–40 Bq/m2/a (Figure 1). The deposition level is lower than in southern Finland, where the maximum deposition is about 80 Bq/m2/a. In the atmosphere the 210Po:210Pb, activity ratio is usually about 5–10%, so the amount of 210Po deposition in Finnish Lapland is about 2 Bq/m2/a [10]. However, the 210Po:210Pb activity ratio continues to increase after the deposition.
210Po is enriched from soil to plants via root uptake [11,12] and in less extent via foliar uptake. Lichens behave differently than plants as 210Po transfers and enriches from air and surface soil to lichens mainly by surface (aerial) uptake [13]. 210Pb, a grandmother radionuclide of 210Po, has a different chemical and radiochemical behaviour than 210Po, although some similarities occur. Just like 210Po, 210Pb has also been found to accumulate efficiently to lichen, similarly with stable lead [14]. However, as will be discussed next and can be seen from the data in Table 1 and Table 2, there are clear differences between 210Po and 210Pb in their bioavailability and enrichment in the food chains.
Lichen is the main fodder of reindeer during the winter. In the 1960s, the 210Pb activity concentration in lichen (Cladonia alpestris) varied between 210 and 380 Bq/kg dry weight (d.w.) in Finnish Lapland and between 190 and 300 Bq/kg d.w. in southern Finland [15]. The 210Po:210Pb activity ratio in lichen varied from 0.78 to 0.98. The activity concentrations of 210Pb and 210Po were about a factor of 50 higher in lichen compared to those in other plants that reindeer eat during the summer season, such as birch (Betula verrucosa/Betula pendula) leaves. Persson [19] found similar 210Pb activity concentration levels in lichen in Sweden. According to his studies, the effective half-life (physical + biological) of 210Pb in lichen is 7 ± 2 years. As 210Pb and 210Po are natural radionuclides, their amount in the environment is very stable in the long-time scale. Due to this, the 210Pb content in lichen has not changed during the several decades of monitoring. The activity concentration of 210Pb in ground lichen (Cladonia sp.) was 250 Bq/kg d.w. in western Lapland in 1980 and 170 Bq/kg d.w. in eastern Lapland in 2004 [16].
Reindeer consume mushrooms in late summer and autumn. The 210Pb content in brown-yellow boletus (Suillus luteus) is rather low, only a few Bq/kg d.w. However, they contain 100–140 Bq/kg d.w. of 210Po, which significantly increases the intake of this nuclide into reindeer [16]. The content of 210Pb and 210Po varies two orders of magnitude from one species to another in mushrooms sampled in northern Finland (Figure 2a,b) [17]. The activity concentration of 210Pb ranged from 1.55 (Leccinum vulpinum) to 16.2 (Cortinarius armillatus) Bq/kg d.w. For 210Po, the corresponding range was from 8.98 (Hygrophorus camarophyllus) to 2192 (Leccinum vulpinum) Bq/kg d.w., respectively. Additionally, the type of forest and forest soil affects the content of 210Pb and 210Po in mushrooms. For example, the concentration level of radionuclides in the organic-rich litter layer affects the radionuclide content of mushrooms, but a clear connection between soil type and concentrations of 210Pb and 210Po in mushrooms has not been established yet. Furthermore, mushroom species are suggested to be the most important factor in radionuclide accumulation [17].
The activity concentration of 210Pb and 210Po in different parts of blueberry and lingonberry in northern Finland is depicted in Figure 3 [17]. The activity concentration of 210Po is higher than that of 210Pb in stems, berries, and leaves of both berry species, indicating a higher bioavailability of polonium compared to lead. The berries have much smaller activity content of both radionuclides compared to other parts of the plants. Plants are known to have a selective ability to metal uptake, capacity to store toxic metals in inert parts (e.g., tree stems) and seedlings, and prevention mechanism for blocking accumulation of toxic metals in their reproductive organs, e.g., seeds and berries [20,21,22,23,24].
The seasonal variation of reindeer’s feeding habits are also reflected in the content of 210Pb and 210Po in various reindeer tissues (Figure 4). The activity concentrations are in their minimum in summer when reindeers have consumed vascular plants, birch leaves, etc. (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The activity concentrations are higher in autumn and winter after the consumption of first mushroom and, later, lichen [15].
According to results by Solatie et al. [16], 210Pb mainly enriches reindeer bones after entering to reindeer body. There was a 10-fold concentration of 210Pb in the reindeer bones compared to muscles. In the same study, the concentration of 210Po was two times higher in bones than in muscles, at most. Therefore, relative enrichment of 210Po to bones was not as high as of 210Pb in investigated samples. Alongside bones, both 210Pb and especially 210Po enrich the liver and kidney in reindeer. The same preference for enrichment of 210Pb was also observed with aribous in Canada [13]. In past centuries when reindeer was the foundation of diet among reindeer herders, consumption of inner organs and bone marrow of reindeer was also considerable; therefore, it has had a significant effect on intake of both 210Pb and 210Po, increasing the internal radiation dose in the Lapland region.
Enrichment of 210Pb and 210Po from diet to humans is roughly similar to reindeer, since both radionuclides accumulate to human bone, liver, and kidney. Next, some differences between the two regions (Lapland and southern Finland) with different diets in the past, in the concentrations of 210Pb and 210Po in human organs, are discussed. A related review about possible increased cancer risk among Sami people due to anthropogenic radionuclides from nuclear weapons tests, diet, and life habits has been recently published by Soininen and Mussalo-Rauhamaa [25].
Kauranen and Miettinen [15] estimated that the intake of 210Po via ingestion within the reindeer herding population, 2.6 Bq/d, was 20 times higher than in the case of the general population, having an average western diet of 0.12 Bq/d. The corresponding intake of 210Pb was three times higher, 0.32 Bq/d, within the reindeer herding population, than in the average western diet of 0.12 Bq/d. The high intake of 210Po was mainly due to 210Po in reindeer meat and liver. In recent decades, the difference in diet habits between reindeer herders vs. the average population has probably decreased but not entirely disappeared. The high 210Po content in diets is also reflected in the body content of 210Po within the reindeer herding population. The 210Po activity concentration in the blood of reindeer herders was almost 20 times higher than within the population of Helsinki. The difference in the case of 210Pb was almost threefold. Correspondingly, the activity concentration of 210Po in human placenta in Inari and Utsjoki was over 12 times higher than within the population of Helsinki. In the case of teeth, the difference was only about a factor of two; the same as with 210Pb. It is clear that 210Po is not accumulated into teeth but is formed in situ from the decay of 210Pb.
In a later study by Mussalo-Rauhamaa et al. [18], a set of tissue samples of five autopsy cases from Inari and Utsjoki region, deceased between 1977 and 1979, were analyzed. It was found that the 210Pb activity concentration in human liver ranged from 0.13 to 1.0 Bq/kg wet weight (w.w.) with an average value of 0.48 Bq/kg w.w. In autopsy cases from southern Finland, an average 210Pb activity concentration of 0.27 Bq/kg w.w. was obtained. 210Po activity concentration in human liver in Lapland ranged from 0.40 to 8.0 Bq/kg w.w., with an average of 3.2 Bq/kg w.w. In autopsy cases from southern Finland, an average 210Po activity concentration of 0.57 Bq/kg w.w. was obtained. Thus, the activity concentration was two times higher in the residents of Lapland compared to those in southern Finland in the case of 210Pb. In the case of 210Po, the average activity concentration was over five times higher in the residents of Lapland compared to those in southern Finland. In a recent study, Muikku et al. [26] reported that the 210Po content in urine was three times higher in reindeer herders than the control group representing the average population. However, in the case of 210Pb, there was no difference.
The work of Holm and Persson [27] indicates clearly how 210Po dominates the total alpha activity of lichen (Table 3). The activity concentration of 210Po in 1972 was 50 times higher than the infamous plutonium isotopes from the atmospheric nuclear tests. In addition, the deposition of 210Pb has recurred every year after the ice age and will recur in the future too, contrary to plutonium deposition, which was in a longer timescale and was practically a single event. Furthermore, the half-lives of artificial radionuclides 238Pu (t½ = 87.7 a), 244Cm (t½= 18.1 a), and 242Cm (t½ = 163 d) are so short that they have decayed more or less significantly since their introduction to the environment.
After 1972, there have been several other nuclear events releasing artificial radionuclides to the environment, most importantly the nuclear reactor accidents of Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011. This kind of accidental release of radionuclides creates local and regional elevated radiation exposure. The radionuclide(s) in question, as well as the released activity level, environmental conditions, and countermeasures after the accident, etc., determine how high fractions of the received radiation dose are from natural radionuclides and from accidentally released (often artificial) radionuclides. The early situation after a nuclear accident, where artificial radionuclides often dominate the natural radionuclides as an exposure source, may change during time, when shorter-lived artificial radionuclides have been decaying and both spontaneous environmental processes, as well as remediation actions, have occurred.
The consumption of mushrooms and berries in Finland gives an example about changing radiation dose contributions due to new radioactivity sources. Deposition of 137Cs from the Chernobyl accident was uneven and parts of southern and central Finland received high deposition of 137Cs, whereas Finnish Lapland remained almost untouched. Therefore, 210Po and 210Pb in mushrooms and berries are still the main factors in their resulting ingested radiation dose in Lapland, while in southern Finland, Chernobyl-originated 137Cs has been the most important radionuclide, causing radiation doses from consumption of mushrooms and berries after 1986 [17].
In addition to radioecological studies, determination of 210Pb and 210Po from peat and sediment samples has been widely utilized in age dating purposes in Finland [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Applications of 210Po and 210Pb age dating have been found in, e.g., geology, environmental pollution studies, ecology, biogeochemistry, and climate change research.

3. Uranium Isotopes

There is not much published data about uranium concentrations in the terrestrial, above-ground environment in Finland (Table 4). The reasons for not studying or publishing uranium concentrations can be only speculated; maybe the concentration in the air, deposition, soil, and biota has been considered low, in respect to biological enrichment and health risks. Extensive investigations into U concentration in the Finnish geological environment have been conducted, but they have focused on studying conditions in the bedrock during and after the last ice age and characterizing chemical properties of the bedrock for nuclear waste disposal. Additionally, natural U deposits (natural analogue sites) and U-rich rock formations have been important research topics of radionuclide migration in Finland. In these geochemical studies, determination of U and Th concentrations, oxidation states of U, as well as sample age determination via U and Th isotope ratios, have been utilized as research methods [36,37,38,39].
The majority of ingested uranium in Finland, and possibly following health effects from uranium exposure, is due to consumption of drinking water containing substantial amounts of 238U and its daughters. Since this review focuses on exposure and enrichment route via ingestion of food, natural radionuclides in Finnish drinking waters are excluded from this overview, as that topic should earn its own literature review. Health effects from uranium decay series radionuclides due to drinking water consumption in Finland have been published by, e.g., Kahlos and Asikainen [42], Auvinen et al. [43], Kurttio et al. [44], Vesterbacka et al. [45], Vesterbacka [46], Kurttio et al. [47], and Turtiainen et al. [48]. However, enrichment of uranium from soil to food products and further to humans has been proved, e.g., in Germany [49] and Canada [13].
Yliruokanen [40] investigated the effect of uranium-rich bedrock on natural radionuclide concentrations of above-growing plants. The plant samples were collected in different locations in southern Finland in 1972 [50]. The published U concentrations in the plant ash varied from one plant group to another. The reported values were converted to a concentration of U in dried plants, shown in Table 4. Mosses (Cetraria islandica, Pleurozium schreberi, Sphagnum sp., Dicranum sp., Polytrichum commune, Hylocomium splendens, and Rhacomitrium microcarpon) had the highest U concentrations, 0.16–47 mg/kg d.w. The moss sample with the highest U concentration value was growing within proximity of U-rich pegmatite formation. Other plant species had a 10-fold variation in U concentrations: lichens (Cladonia alpestris, CI. arbuscula) had U concentrations of 0.06–0.57 mg/kg d.w., blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) had 0.05 mg/kg d.w., lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaéa) had 0.05 mg/kg d.w., silver birch (Betula alba) had 0.04–0.12 mg/kg d.w., and conifers (Pinus sylverstris and Picea abies) had 0.03–0.51 mg/kg d.w. [40].
Roivainen et al. [41] studied four different plant species, in respect to U accumulation from soil to plants, using concentration ratios. The investigated plant species were May lily (Maianthemum bifolium), narrow buckler fern (Dryopteris carthusiana), rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), and Norway spruce (Picea abies). They found that all four plant species behaved quite similarly, the mean U concentrations being 0.01–0.02 mg/kg d.w. (0.12–0.25 in Bq/kg) in leaves or needles and 0.09–0.17 mg/kg d.w. (1.1–2.1 in Bq/kg) in coarse roots. In all species, the concentration ratio between the plant and soil was higher in roots than in leaves/needles.
Indeed, high accumulation of U in plant roots and preference for remaining in the root system instead of above-ground plant parts has been observed in many studies, both in water and soil cultivation and with naturally growing plants [51,52,53,54,55].
One study came to the opposite conclusion; the green parts of the common nettle (Urtica dioica) contained more U than roots in the vicinity of a phosphogypsum stockpile [56]. Furthermore, U concentration in the plants did not decrease according to increasing distance from the stockpile. A probable reason for these observations was suspected to be due to aerial uptake of deposition by the plants. In any case, soil properties, plant species, plant age, U concentration of soil, type of root system, U speciation, etc., affect the accumulation of U in plants. Another contradictory study utilized a variety of plants and soil layers O and C beneath them, collected from a wide sampling area across northern Europe, including Finland [57]. Plant samples blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus), cowberry/lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea), crowberry (Empetrum nigrum), birch (Betula pubescens), willow (Salix spp.), pine (Pinus sylvestris), and spruce (Picea Abies) contained extremely low concentration of U, and plant/soil ratio could not be determined due to this. Moss samples (Hylocomium splendens and Pleurozium schreberi) were an exception, since they contained low but detectable amounts of U: 0.029 mg/kg d.w. was the median value of 140 samples. This study concluded that U remains in the C layer, instead of accumulating to plants via root uptake.
Uranium mostly enriches the kidneys, but also the skeleton and, to lesser extent, other internal organs after entering to human body. The predominant exposure source of U for humans in Finland is drinking water [44]. However, studies on increased cancer risk due to U and other natural radionuclides in Finnish drinking waters, including drilled wells in the U-rich bedrock, have not found clear correlation between cancer incidents and natural radionuclide content in drinking water [43,47].

4. Thorium Isotopes

Compared to 238U, there is even less published data about Th concentrations in the Finnish environment. Th, being at valence state 4+ in the environment, is less soluble and mobile than U, which is hexavalent in aerobic conditions and tetravalent in anoxic conditions in the environment. Thus, Th is less available for biota as well. Concentration of Th isotopes in the environment is lower than that of 238U. This can be also seen from the literature values of Reference [58] (Table 5), where activity concentrations of Th isotopes are shown to be much lower than the corresponding values of 238U. Higher concentrations of Th, equal to U, were found from plant samples growing close to or on a U-rich formation [40]. Transfer of Th from soil to food products has been observed in several international studies, e.g., [59,60,61,62], as well as accumulation of Th isotopes to humans from ingestion or inhalation, as in References [63,64,65].
Th resembles U in transferring from water (in hydroponic cultivation tests) or soil to plants via root uptake, because a major part of Th remains in the roots and only a minor part relocates to other parts of the plants [54]. Th was also found out to be bioaccumulated into wheat seedlings from water and soil in a phytoremediation study [66].
Yliruokanen [40] found out that 232Th concentration was low in plant ash, regardless of the plant species, being 0.24–4.1 Bq/kg d.w. (0.06–1.0 mg/kg d.w.) in lichens (Cladonia alpestris, CI. arbuscula), mosses (Cetraria islandica, Pleurozium schreberi, Sphagnum sp., Dicranum sp., Polytrichum commune, Hylocomium splendens, Rhacomitrium microcarpon), heather (Calluna vulgaris), blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus), lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaéa), and conifers, while it was below the detection limit in deciduous trees. The sampled plants were growing in areas with U-rich bedrock. Additionally, the concentration of 232Th in the investigated plants was stable considering varying mineralogical compositions and radionuclide levels in the bedrock below among the sampling sites.
According to Muuronen [58], three thorium isotopes were present in lichen samples of Lapland, namely 232Th (t½ = 1.405 × 1010 a), 230Th (t½ = 75400 a), and 228Th (t½ = 1.913 a). The activity concentration ranges varied from 0.076 to 0.47 Bq/kg d.w., from 0.063 to 0.19 Bq/kg d.w., and from 0.12 to 0.57 Bq/kg d.w. for 232Th, 230Th, and 228Th, respectively. In central Sweden, the corresponding activity concentrations were 0.06, 0.06, and 0.13 Bq/kg d.w., respectively; in other words, they were of the same order of magnitude as in northern Finland [27].
Muuronen [58] determined the same Th isotopes from reindeer bone samples as well. The activity concentration of 228Th, 2.4–23 Bq/kg d.w., was significantly higher in the reindeer bone samples compared to that of 232Th, 0.011–0.096 Bq/kg d.w., and 230Th, 0.012–0.11 Bq/kg d.w. This was due to presence of 228Ra, the mother nuclide of 228Th, in the reindeer bones. Young reindeers had much lower 228Th concentration in their bones compared to old reindeer individuals, who had a longer history of consuming lichen and other plants containing natural radionuclides. Therefore, there is no isotopic fractionation of Th isotopes in bioaccumulation to reindeer, based on these results.
Th enriches human skeletons just like U does. However, it was observed in the study by Larivière et al. [65] that, while accumulation of U was age-dependent in bone samples and it correlated with calcium turnover rate in the bones, Th accumulation in the bones was not age-dependent. The activity concentrations of Th isotopes in human bones in Finland have been determined to be 0.002–0.003 Bq/kg w.w. for 232Th, 0.004–0.005 Bq/kg w.w. for 230Th, and 0.010–0.013 Bq/kg w.w. for 228Th [58].

5. Radiation Dose Due to 210Pb and 210Po from Consumption of Reindeer Meat

Solatie et al. [16] calculated that a reindeer herder receives an effective radiation dose of 0.7 mSv/a when he/she consumes 200 g of reindeer meat daily, and the measured activity concentration of 210Po in the reindeer meat is 9 Bq/kg. The radiation dose increment from reindeer meat ingestion is 19% of the total annual average radiation dose from all sources in Finland. For comparison, effective annual radiation dose from inhalation of 210Pb in Finnish Lapland has been estimated to be 7 µSv/a, so the dose from inhaled 210Pb would be only 1% of the dose from 210Po via daily consumption of reindeer meat [67]. As previously presented, the radiation dose from other natural radionuclides is negligible compared to that from 210Pb and 210Po. However, other natural sources of radiation exposure, such as indoor radon, cosmic radiation, and gamma radiation from the ground, are the main factors contributing to the annual dose.
Thomas and Gates [13] calculated radiation doses from ingesting natural radionuclides in the case of the food chain lichen-caribou-man in northern Canada. They assessed effective annual doses from consuming meat, liver, and kidney separately and together. In their most similar case to the aforementioned calculation in [16], 100 g of caribou meat was consumed daily, and the resulting effective dose from 210Po was 0.61 mSv/a. The estimated radiation doses due to ingestion of reindeer meat in northern Finland and caribou meat in northern Canada are similar. Furthermore, consuming 100 g of caribou meat daily, one caribou liver per year, and 10 caribou kidneys per year would produce in total an effective radiation dose of 1.2 mSv/a only from 210Po [13], but other natural radionuclides have their own inputs to the received radiation dose as well.

6. Summary of Highlights in Natural Radionuclide Studies in Terrestrial Environment in Finland in Recent Decades

Highlights of the articles cited in this review are presented in the timeline in Figure 7. Interest in natural radionuclides as a source of radiation exposure in Finland is constantly increasing among decision-makers, research funding bodies, and research institutes, mainly due to NORM- (naturally occurring radioactive materials) related risks associated with existing and planned mines. New research openings will probably bring substantial amounts of new data about natural radionuclides in the Finnish environment, which is long-awaited and necessary as there are gaps in the timeline and only a few literature sources are available from the past six decades.

7. Conclusions

Considerable amounts of data concerning the transfer of natural radionuclides, especially 210Pb and 210Po, along with the subarctic food-chain lichen-reindeer-man have been gathered during the last 5–6 decades. Still, concentrations and bioaccumulation of natural radionuclides in terrestrial food chains are not fully known, and it would be useful to have more data of radionuclide concentrations in the biological samples in Finland. For example, U and Th have been much less investigated compared to Pb and Po, both in the environment and in humans. More numerous data would enable more reliable and accurate evaluation of radionuclide transfer and adverse effects due to radionuclide bioaccumulation.
Compared to studies performed in other subarctic regions, natural radionuclide concentrations in the Finnish terrestrial environment and biota are at the same level, although high variations exist in activity concentration values of a radionuclide. When comparing internal ingested radiation doses from foods among a wider group of populations, the highest concentration values of natural radionuclides in edible plants, mushrooms, and reindeer need to be notified due to the common practice of collecting natural food items and due to the specific reindeer herding tradition in Finland.
Differences in concentration levels and bioaccumulation of 210Pb and 210Po between two population groups, Sami people in Lapland and people in southern Finland, are clear, since they have had different diets until recent decades. It has been concluded that 210Po and 210Pb are the most important radionuclides in Lapland and 137Cs from the Chernobyl accident is the main contributor in southern Finland, while considering the radiation dose from consuming mushroom and berries in recent decades [17]. Food chain studies are constantly important in the evaluation of human radiation exposure both locally and globally as there are radioecologically exceptional environments for living, cultivating, hunting, and collecting and regional diets containing established and specific food chains. Furthermore, the level of radioactive contamination and bioavailable radionuclides in environments, both natural and artificial, will probably increase in the future. Forthcoming sources of environmental radioactivity can include accidental and controlled releases from nuclear power plants, nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities, and nuclear weapons testing. In addition, the operation of uranium mines and other mines releasing NORM radionuclides into the environment is likely to increase in the future.
Various radioecological and radiation protection models have been developed to assess the transfer of radionuclides along food chains and radiation doses due to ingestion. It has been pointed out by Thomas and Gates [13] that these models do not necessarily take into account chemical toxicity of the radionuclides, in addition to radiochemical and radiobiological effects. Radionuclides are often chemical analogues to stable elements in humans, for example, Po and S are chemical analogues and, therefore, Po can replace S in proteins. Not all of these special features of radionuclides in biological processes are included in the current radiation exposure and radionuclide transfer models; therefore, models need further development for obtaining improved views about the effects of biological enrichment of radionuclides in the environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.-P. and J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.-P. and J.P.; writing—review and editing, S.S.-P. and J.P. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

KO467 “Food and healthy security in the Norwegian, Russian, and Finnish border regions: linking local industries, communities, and socio-economic impacts”, EU/Kolarctic-ENPI-CBC programme. VN/17963/2020 “Source and health effects of radioactive substances within the Arctic area”, Finnish Foreign Ministry/IBA programme.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was initiated within the project “Food and health security in the Norwegian, Russian, and Finnish border regions: linking local industries, communities, and socio-economic impacts”. The project was funded by the EU/Kolarctic-ENPI-CBC programme managed by the Regional Council of Lapland. The work was accomplished within the project “Sources and health effects of radioactive substances within the Arctic area”, funded by the Finnish Foreign Ministry.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miettinen, J.K.; Jokelainen, A.; Roine, P.; Lidén, K.; Naversten, Y. 137Cs and potassium in people and diet—A study of finnish lapps. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A II Chemica 1963, 120, 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  2. Svensson, G.K.; Lidén, K. The transport of 137Cs from lichen to animal and man. Health Phys. 1965, 11, 1393–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hanson, W.C. Cesium-137 in Alaskan lichens, caribou and eskimos. Health Phys. 1967, 13, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baskaran, M.; Coleman, C.H.; Santschi, P.H. Atmospheric depositional fluxes of 7Be and 210Pb at Galveston and college station, Texas. J. Geophys. Res. 1993, 98, 20555–20571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Turtiainen, T.; Kostiainen, E. Radiological hazards in finnish cereals: Comparison of man-made and natural sources. Cereal Res. Commun. 2013, 41, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kämäräinen, M.; Turtiainen, T.; Vaaramaa, K. Radioactivity of Meat and Eggs Produced in Finland. Ympäristön Säteilyvalvonnan Toimintaohjelma, Ympäristön Säteilyvalvonta ja Valmius; Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority: Helsinki, Finland, 2017.
  7. Vetikko, V.; Turtiainen, T.; Leppänen, A.P.; Kämäräinen, M. Radioactivity of Timber in Finland. Ympäristön Säteilyvalvonnan Toimintaohjelma. Ympäristön Säteilyvalvonta; Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority: Helsinki, Finland, 2015.
  8. Paatero, J.; Salminen-Paatero, S. Transfer of transuranium elements along the food chain lichen-reindeer-man—A review of investigations in Finnish Lapland. J. Environ. Radioact. 2020, 212, 106126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paatero, J.; Vaaramaa, K.; Buyukay, M.; Hatakka, J.; Lehto, J. Deposition of atmospheric 210Pb and total beta activity in Finland. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 303, 2413–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paatero, J.; Vesterbacka, K.; Makkonen, U.; Kyllönen, K.; Hellen, H.; Hatakka, J.; Anttila, P. Resuspension of radionuclides into the atmosphere due to forest fires. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2009, 282, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hansen, W.R.; Watters, R.L. Plant uptake of 210Po from soil. Radiat. Bot. 1970, 10, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vaaramaa, K.; Aro, L.; Solatie, D.; Lehto, J. Distribution of 210Pb and 210Po in boreal forest soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 6165–6171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thomas, P.A.; Gates, T.E. Radionuclides in the lichen-caribou-human food chain near uranium mining operations in Northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Environ. Health Persp. 1999, 107, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Laaksovirta, K.; Olkkonen, H.; Alakuijala, P. Observations on the lead content of lichen and bark adjacent to a highway in Southern Finland. Environ. Pollut. 1976, 11, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kauranen, P.; Miettinen, J.K. 210Po and 210Pb in the Arctic food chain and the natural radiation exposure of lapps. Health Phys. 1969, 16, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Solatie, D.; Junttila, M.; Vesterbacka, P. 210Po and 210Pb in the food chain lichen–reindeer–man. Radiochemistry 2006, 48, 632–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vaaramaa, K.; Solatie, D.; Aro, L. Distribution of 210Pb and 210Po concentrations in wild berries and mushrooms in boreal forest ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 408, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mussalo-Rauhamaa, H.; Jaakkola, T.; Miettinen, J.K.; Laiho, K. Plutonium in Finnish Lapps. An estimate of the gastrointestinal absorption of plutonium by man based on a comparison of the plutonium content of Lapps and Southern Finns. Health Phys. 1984, 46, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Persson, B.R. 210Pb-Atmospheric deposition in lichen-carpets in northern Sweden during 1961–1969. Tellus 1970, 22, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Turpeinen, R.; Salminen, J.; Kairesalo, T. Mobility and bioavailability of lead in contaminated boreal forest soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 5152–5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Clemens, S. Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta 2001, 212, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Paatero, J.; Dauvalter, V.; Derome, J.; Lehto, J.; Pasanen, J.; Vesala, T.; Miettinen, J.; Makkonen, U.; Kyrö, E.-M.; Jernström, J.; et al. Effects of Kola Air Pollution on the Environment in the Western Part of the Kola Peninsula and Finnish Lapland—Final Report; Finnish Meteorological Institute: Helsinki, Finland, 2008.
  23. Wang, Y.; Zong, K.; Jiang, L.; Sun, J.; Ren, Y.; Sun, Z.; Wen, C.; Chen, X.; Cao, S. Characterization of an Arabidopsis cadmium-resistant mutant cdr3-1D reveals a link between heavy metal resistance as well as seed development and flowering. Planta 2011, 233, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, G.; Ma, J.; Jiang, P.; Li, J.; Gao, J.; Qiao, S.; Zhao, Z. The mechanism of plant resistance to heavy metal. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 310, 052004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Soininen, L.; Mussalo-Rauhamaa, H. Cancer incidence of finnish sami in the light of exposure to radioactive fallout. Int J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Muikku, M.; Heikkinen, T.; Solatie, D.; Vesterbacka, P. Natural variation in 210Po and 210Pb activity concentrations in the urine of Finnish population groups. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2011, 50, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Holm, E.; Persson, B.R.R. Comparative studies of natural and artificial α-emitters (actinides) in the lichen-reindeer-man food chain. In Actinides in Man and Animals, Proceedings of the Snowbird Actinide Workshop; 15–17 October 1979, Wrenn, M.E., Ed.; RD Press: Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 1979; pp. 525–537. [Google Scholar]
  28. Appleby, P.G.; Oldfield, F.; Thompson, R.; Huttunen, P.; Tolonen, K. 210Pb dating of annually laminated lake sediments from Finland. Nature 1979, 280, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El-Daoushy, F.; Tolonen, K.; Rosenberg, R. Lead 210 and moss-increment dating of two Finnish Sphagnum hummocks. Nature 1982, 296, 429–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. El-Daoushy, F.; Tolonen, K. Lead-210 and heavy metal contents in dated ombrotrophic peat hummocks from Finland. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 1984, 223, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tolonen, M. Vegetational history in coastal SW Finland studied on a lake and a peat bog by pollen and charcoal analysis. In Annales Botanici Fennici; Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board: Helsinki, Finland, 1987; Volume 24, pp. 353–370. [Google Scholar]
  32. Reinikainen, P.; Meriläinen, J.J.; Virtanen, A.; Veijola, H.; Äystö, J. Accuracy of 210Pb dating in two annually laminated lake sediments with high Cs background. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1997, 48, 1009–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rausch, N.; Nieminen, T.; Ukonmaanaho, L.; Le Roux, G.; Krachler, M.; Cheburkin, A.K.; Bonani, G.; Shotyk, W. Comparison of atmospheric deposition of copper, nickel, cobalt, zinc, and cadmium recorded by finnish peat cores with monitoring data and emission records. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 5989–5998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ukonmaanaho, L.; Nieminen, T.M.; Rausch, N.; Cheburkin, A.; Le Roux, G.; Shotyk, W. Recent organic matter accumulation in relation to some climatic factors in ombrotrophic peat bogs near heavy metal emission sources in Finland. Glob. Planet Change 2006, 53, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, H.; Väliranta, M.; Piilo, S.; Amesbury, M.J.; Aquino-Lopez, M.A.; Roland, T.P.; Salminen-Paatero, S.; Paatero, J.; Lohila, A.; Tuittila, E.-S. Decreased carbon accumulation feedback driven by climate-induced drying of two southern boreal bogs over recent centuries. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 2435–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Suksi, J.; Ruskeeniemi, T.; Lindberg, A.; Jaakkola, T. The distribution of natural radionuclides on fracture surfaces in Palmottu Analogue Study site in SW Finland. Radiochim. Acta 1991, 52–53, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Suksi, J.; Rasilainen, K. On the role of alpha-recoil in uranium migration—Some findings from the Palmottu natural analogue site, SW Finland. Radiochim. Acta 1996, 74, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ahonen, L.; Ervanne, H.; Jaakkola, T.; Blomqvist, R. Redox chemistry in uranium-rich groundwater of Palmottu uranium deposit, Finland. Radiochim. Acta 1994, 66–67, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ervanne, H. Uranium oxidation states in allanite, fergusonite and monazite of pegmatites from Finland. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie-Monatshefte 2004, 7, 289–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yliruokanen, I. Uranium, thorium, lead, lanthanoids and yttrium in some plants growing on granitic and radioactive rocks. Bull. Geol. Soc. Finl. 1975, 47, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roivainen, P.; Makkonen, S.; Holopainen, T.; Juutilainen, J. Soil-to-plant transfer of uranium and its distribution between plant parts in four boreal forest species. Boreal Environ. Res. 2011, 16, 158–166. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kahlos, H.; Asikainen, M. Internal radiation doses from radioactivity of drinking water in Finland. Health Phys. 1980, 39, 108–111. [Google Scholar]
  43. Auvinen, A.; Kurttio, P.; Pekkanen, J.; Pukkala, E.; Ilus, T.; Salonen, L. Uranium and other natural radionuclides in drinking water and risk of leukemia: A case-cohort study in Finland. Cancer Causes Control 2002, 13, 825–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kurttio, P.; Auvinen, A.; Salonen, L.; Saha, H.; Pekkanen, J.; Mäkeläinen, I.; Väisänen, S.B.; Penttilä, I.M.; Komulainen, H. Renal effects of uranium in drinking water. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vesterbacka, P.; Mäkeläinen, I.; Arvela, H. Natural radioactivity in drinking water in private wells in Finland. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2005, 113, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vesterbacka, P. Natural radioactivity in drinking water in Finland. Boreal Env. Res. 2007, 12, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kurttio, P.; Salonen, L.; Ilus, T.; Pekkanen, J.; Pukkala, E.; Auvinen, A. Well water radioactivity and risk of cancers of the urinary organs. Environ. Res. 2006, 102, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Turtiainen, T.; Muikku, M.; Vesterbacka, P.; Heikkinen, T. Uranium and 226Ra in drinking water supplied by Finnish waterworks. Radioprotection 2011, 46, S255–S263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Anke, M.; Seeber, O.; Müller, R.; Schäfer, U.; Zerull, J. Uranium transfer in the food chain from soil to plants, animals and man. Geochemistry 2009, 69, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nieminen, K.; Yliruokanen, I. Trace element analysis of granitic and radioactive rocks by spark source mass spectrometry with electrical detection. Bull. Geol. Soc. Finl. 1974, 46, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shahandeh, H.; Hossner, L.R. Role of soil properties in phytoaccumulation of uranium. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2002, 141, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rodríguez, P.B.; Tomé, F.V.; Fernández, M.P.; Lozano, J.C. Linearity assumption in soil-to-plant transfer factors of natural uranium and radium in Helianthus annuus L. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 361, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chang, P.; Kim, K.-W.; Yoshida, S.; Kim, S.-Y. Uranium accumulation of crop plants enhanced by citric acid. Environ. Geochem. Health 2005, 27, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shtangeeva, I. Uptake of uranium and thorium by native and cultivated plants. J. Environ. Radioact. 2010, 101, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Soudek, P.; Petrová, Š.; Benešová, D.; Dvořáková, M.; Vaněk, T. Uranium uptake by hydroponically cultivated crop plants. J. Environ. Radioact. 2011, 102, 598–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Olszewski, G.; Boryło, A.; Skwarzec, B. A study on possible use of Urtica dioica (Common nettle) plants as uranium (234U, 238U) contamination bioindicator near phosphogypsum stockpile. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2016, 308, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Reimann, C.; Koller, F.; Frengstad, B.; Kashulina, G.; Niskavaara, H.; Englmaier, P. Comparison of the element composition in several plant species and their substrate from a 1,500,000-km2 area in Northern Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 278, 87–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Muuronen, S. Distribution and Concentration of Thorium Isotopes in Lichen, Reindeer Bone and Human Bone. Radiochemistry Research Project Report; Laboratory of Radiochemistry, University of Helsinki: Helsinki, Finland, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pietrzak-Flis, Z.; Suplinska, M.M.; Rosiak, L. The dietary intake of 238U, 234U, 230Th, 232Th, 228Th and 226Ra from food and drinking water by inhabitants of the Walbrzych region. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1997, 222, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sathyapriya, R.S.; Nair, S.; Baskaran, K.; Prabhath, R.; Nair, M.; Acharya, R.; Rao, D. Estimation of thorium intake due to consumption of vegetables by inhabitants of high background radiation area by INAA. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2013, 294, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Frindik, O. Thorium und Uran in Lebensmitteln tierischer Herkunft [Thorium amd uranium in food of animal origin]. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1992, 194, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lauria, D.D.C.; Rochedo, E.R.R.; Godoy, M.L.D.P.; Santos, E.E.; Hacon, S.S. Naturally occurring radionuclides in food and drinking water from a thorium-rich area. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2012, 51, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wrenn, M.E.; Singh, N.P.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Cohen, N.; Saccomanno, G. Thorium in human tissues. In Proceedings of the Conference on natural radiation environment III, Houston, TX, USA, 23–28 April 1978; Gesell, T.F., Lowder, W.M., Eds.; Department of Energy, Technical Information Center: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 1980; pp. 783–799. [Google Scholar]
  64. Leiterer, A.; Berard, P.; Menetrier, F. Thorium and Health: State of the Art. Rapport CEA-R-6251; CEA Fontenay aux Roses, Direction des Sciences du Vivant, Unité Prositon: Fontenay aux Roses, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  65. Larivière, D.; Packer, A.P.; Marro, L.; Li, C.; Chen, J.; Cornett, R.J. Age dependence of natural uranium and thorium concentrations in bone. Health Phys. 2007, 92, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shtangeeva, I.; Ayrault, S. Phytoextraction of thorium from soil and water media. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2004, 154, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Salminen-Paatero, S.; Paatero, J. Total beta activity, 137Cs and 90Sr in surface air in northern Finland in 1963. Radiochim. Acta 2012, 100, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Deposition of 210Pb (Bq/m2/a) in Finland. Original data is published in [9].
Figure 1. Deposition of 210Pb (Bq/m2/a) in Finland. Original data is published in [9].
Ijerph 18 10577 g001
Figure 2. (a). 210Pb activity content of different mushroom species (blue = Leccinum Versipelle, red = Leccinum Vulpinum, black = Lactarius Rufus, green = Russula Decolorans, and purple = Cortinarius Armillatus) in northern Finland, from the data in [17]. (b). 210Po activity content of different mushroom species (blue = Leccinum Versipelle, red = Leccinum Vulpinum, black = Lactarius Rufus, green = Russula Decolorans, and purple = Cortinarius Armillatus) in northern Finland, from the data in [17].
Figure 2. (a). 210Pb activity content of different mushroom species (blue = Leccinum Versipelle, red = Leccinum Vulpinum, black = Lactarius Rufus, green = Russula Decolorans, and purple = Cortinarius Armillatus) in northern Finland, from the data in [17]. (b). 210Po activity content of different mushroom species (blue = Leccinum Versipelle, red = Leccinum Vulpinum, black = Lactarius Rufus, green = Russula Decolorans, and purple = Cortinarius Armillatus) in northern Finland, from the data in [17].
Ijerph 18 10577 g002
Figure 3. 210Pb and 210Po activity content in different parts of blueberry (V. myrtillus) and lingonberry (V. Vitis-idaea) in northern Finland, drawn from the data in [17]. The black lines denote the 210Po:210Pb activity ratios: a vertical scale on the right.
Figure 3. 210Pb and 210Po activity content in different parts of blueberry (V. myrtillus) and lingonberry (V. Vitis-idaea) in northern Finland, drawn from the data in [17]. The black lines denote the 210Po:210Pb activity ratios: a vertical scale on the right.
Ijerph 18 10577 g003
Figure 4. Average 210Pb and 210Po activity concentrations (Bq/kg wet weight) in reindeer tissues, compiled from data in [15]. The black vertical lines indicate the range of individual values.
Figure 4. Average 210Pb and 210Po activity concentrations (Bq/kg wet weight) in reindeer tissues, compiled from data in [15]. The black vertical lines indicate the range of individual values.
Ijerph 18 10577 g004
Figure 5. 210Po activity concentration (Bq/kg w.w. = wet weight) in reindeer tissues, from the data in [15]. Day number refers to Julian day number.
Figure 5. 210Po activity concentration (Bq/kg w.w. = wet weight) in reindeer tissues, from the data in [15]. Day number refers to Julian day number.
Ijerph 18 10577 g005
Figure 6. 210Pb activity concentration (Bq/kg w.w. = wet weight) in reindeer tissues, from the data in [15]. Day number refers to Julian day number.
Figure 6. 210Pb activity concentration (Bq/kg w.w. = wet weight) in reindeer tissues, from the data in [15]. Day number refers to Julian day number.
Ijerph 18 10577 g006
Figure 7. Timeline of the most significant steps in natural radionuclide studies in terrestrial environment in respect to food chains in Finland.
Figure 7. Timeline of the most significant steps in natural radionuclide studies in terrestrial environment in respect to food chains in Finland.
Ijerph 18 10577 g007
Table 1. Concentrations of 210Pb in Finnish environmental and biological samples. d.w. = dry weight, w.w. = wet weight. Sampling year is in parentheses.
Table 1. Concentrations of 210Pb in Finnish environmental and biological samples. d.w. = dry weight, w.w. = wet weight. Sampling year is in parentheses.
Sample TypeA 210Pb (Bq/kg d.w.)A 210Pb (Bq/kg w.w.)Reference
Lichen (1961–1967)190–380 [15]
Lichen (1980)250 [16]
Lichen (2004)170 [16]
Tree leaves (1964–1965) 11–42 [15]
Tree leaves (1989)20 [16]
Mushroom (2004)3 [16]
Mushrooms (2007)1.6–16 [17]
Berries (2004)2 [16]
Berries (2006–2007) 0.09–0.45[17]
Reindeer blood (1965–1967) 1.5–3[15]
Reindeer meat (1965–1967) 0.12–0.30[15]
Reindeer muscle (1984–2004)1.2–4.8 [16]
Reindeer bones (1964–1966) 138–196[15]
Reindeer bones (1988–2004)38–210 [16]
Reindeer kidney (1988–1989)62–85 [16]
Reindeer liver (1964–1967) 10–56[15]
Reindeer liver (2004)150 [16]
Human blood, reindeer herder (1966) 0.23–0.27[15]
Human blood, southern Finland (1966–1967) 0.1[15]
Placenta, Lapland (1966) 0.02–0.12[15]
Placenta, southern Finland (1966) 0.01–0.05[15]
Human kidney, southern Finland (~1966) 0.12–0.24[15]
Human teeth, Lapland (1966–1967)2.4–11 [15]
Human teeth, southern Finland (1966–1967)1.4–2.6 [15]
Human shinbone/tibia, southern Finland (~1966) 1.0–1.5[15]
Human ribs, Lapland (1977) 0.85 and 1.5[18]
Human liver, Lapland (1977–1979) 0.13–1.0 (average 0.48)[18]
Human liver, southern Finland (~1966) 0.08–0.11[15]
Human liver, southern Finland (1976–1979) 0.27 (average)[18]
Table 2. Concentration of 210Po in Finnish environmental and biological samples. Sampling year is in parentheses.
Table 2. Concentration of 210Po in Finnish environmental and biological samples. Sampling year is in parentheses.
Sample TypeA 210Po (Bq/kg d.w.)A 210Po (Bq/kg w.w.)Reference
Lichen (1961–1967)170–350 [15]
Tree leaves (1964–1965)3–12 [15]
Tree leaves (1989)19 [16]
Mushroom (2004)140 [16]
Mushrooms (2007)9–2190 [17]
Berries (2004)2.2 [16]
Berries (2006–2007) 0.3–1.0[17]
Reindeer blood (1965–1967) 4–18[15]
Reindeer meat (1964–1967) 3–12[15]
Reindeer muscle (1984–2004)23–66 [16]
Reindeer bones (1964–1966) 73–78[15]
Reindeer bones (1988–2004)12–71 [16]
Reindeer kidney (1988–1989)120–160 [16]
Reindeer liver (1964–1967) 38–174[15]
Reindeer liver (2004)470 [16]
Human blood, reindeer herder (1966) 0.24–0.57[15]
Human blood, southern Finland (1966–1967) 0.03[15]
Placenta, Lapland (1966) 0.63–2.8[15]
Placenta, southern Finland (1966) 0.05–0.16[15]
Human kidney, southern Finland (~1966) 0.34–0.95[15]
Human teeth, Lapland (1966–1967)2.3–10 [15]
Human teeth, southern Finland (1966–1967)1.4–2.5 [15]
Human shinbone/tibia, southern Finland (~1966) 0.95–1.3[15]
Human ribs, Lapland (1977) 0.8 and 1.0[18]
Human liver, Lapland (1977–1979) 0.4–8.0 (average 3.2)[18]
Human liver, southern Finland (~1966) 0.34–0.83[15]
Human liver, southern Finland (1976–1979) 0.57 (average)[18]
Table 3. Alpha-emitting radionuclides in lichen in Sweden in 1972 (original data from Holm and Persson [27]) and relative activities compared to 238U.
Table 3. Alpha-emitting radionuclides in lichen in Sweden in 1972 (original data from Holm and Persson [27]) and relative activities compared to 238U.
RadionuclideActivity Concentration (Bq/kg d.w.)Relative Activity (Act. Conc. 238U = 1)
210Po2601300
234U0.21
235U0.0070.035
238U0.21
228Th0.130.65
230Th0.060.3
232Th0.060.3
238Pu0.231.15
239+240Pu5.226
241Am1.15.5
237Np0.010.05
242Cm0.00020.001
244Cm0.0020.01
Table 4. Uranium concentration in Finnish environmental samples.
Table 4. Uranium concentration in Finnish environmental samples.
Sample Type238U-conc. (mg/kg d.w.)238U-conc. (Bq/kg d.w.)Reference
Lichens
Mosses
Shrubs
Trees (deciduous and conifers)
0.06–0.57
0.16–47
0.05
0.03–0.51
0.75–7.1
2.0–584
0.62
0.37–6.3
[40]
May lily, narrow buckler fern, rowan, Norway spruce 0.01–0.02 (leaves and needles)
0.09–0.17 (coarse roots)
0.12–0.25
1.1–2.1
[41]
Table 5. Concentrations of Th isotopes in the Finnish environmental and biological samples.
Table 5. Concentrations of Th isotopes in the Finnish environmental and biological samples.
Sample TypeAct. conc. 232Th (Bq/kg) Conc. 232Th (mg/kg) Reference
Lichens, mosses, dwarf shrubs, conifers0.24–4.1 (d.w.)0.06–1.0 (d.w.) [40]
Act. conc. 232Th (Bq/kg)Act. conc. 230Th (Bq/kg)Act. conc. 228Th (Bq/kg)
Lichen 0.076–0.47 (d.w.)0.063–0.19 (d.w.)0.12–0.57 (d.w.)[58]
Reindeer bone 0.011–0.096 (d.w.)0.012–0.11 (d.w.)2.4–23 (d.w.)[58]
Human bone0.002–0.003 (w.w.)0.004–0.005 (w.w.)0.010–0.013 (w.w.)[58]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salminen-Paatero, S.; Paatero, J. Transfer of Natural Radionuclides in Terrestrial Food Chains—A Review of Investigations in Finland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010577

AMA Style

Salminen-Paatero S, Paatero J. Transfer of Natural Radionuclides in Terrestrial Food Chains—A Review of Investigations in Finland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(20):10577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salminen-Paatero, Susanna, and Jussi Paatero. 2021. "Transfer of Natural Radionuclides in Terrestrial Food Chains—A Review of Investigations in Finland" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 20: 10577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010577

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop