Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Exercise Compliance on Risk Reduction for Hamstring Strain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
The Relationship between Mindful Attention Awareness, Perceived Stress and Subjective Wellbeing
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Muscle Strength on Marathon Race-Induced Muscle Soreness
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reopening of Schools in the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Quality of Life of Teachers While Coping with This New Challenge in the North of Spain
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Consequences of COVID-19 Confinement for Teachers: Family-Work Interactions, Technostress, and Perceived Organizational Support

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(21), 11259; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111259
by Patricia Solís García 1,*, Rocío Lago Urbano 2 and Sara Real Castelao 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(21), 11259; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111259
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 22 October 2021 / Accepted: 23 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Teachers' Well-Being at Work and Quality of Life)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Very relevant article given the contingency product of the Covid-19 pandemic, therefore it contributes to scientific knowledge.

Regarding the structure, the results mention and describe the statistical analysis techniques, however, this information must be presented in the materials and methods.

It is recommended to clarify the type of research and strengthen the discussion.

Author Response

Following the suggestions of reviewer number 2, a sentence has been introduced indicating the type of investigation and the statistical analysis techniques are described in the materials and methods section. Likewise, the discussion has been strengthened with new studies.

Reviewer 2 Report

A nice and interesting topic, compliments for the authors.

I have one minor remarks:

Introdution, second paragraph on page 2:

I consider the rational for the study als rather weak, why are these pillars fundamental? I suggest the authors to motivate the reasoning more strongly, supported by some more literature.

 

 

Author Response

the introduction has been reinforced, supporting in the literature the convenience of the 3 fundamental pillars of the study.

Back to TopTop