Next Article in Journal
Relationship between Swimming Performance, Biomechanical Variables and the Calculated Predicted 1-RM Push-up in Competitive Swimmers
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Resilience on Health-Related Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 21
10.3390/ijerph182111392
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alcohol Consumption and Cigarette Smoking among Young Adults: An Instrumental Variable Analysis Using Alcohol Flushing

by
Yongho Jee
1,
Susan Park
2,
Eunu Yuk
3 and
Sung-il Cho
4,*
1
Advanced Biomedical Research Institute, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, 260, Gonghang-daero, Gangseo-gu, Seoul 07804, Korea
2
Institute for Community Care and Health Equity, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Korea
3
Korea Health Promotion Institute, Namsan Square Building, Toegyero 173, Jung-gu, Seoul 04554, Korea
4
Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(21), 11392; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111392
Submission received: 7 September 2021 / Revised: 26 October 2021 / Accepted: 27 October 2021 / Published: 29 October 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Association between drinking and smoking has remained controversial since the association between two studies were influenced by various confounding. Thus, our study aimed to explore the causal effect of alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking using alcohol flushing as an instrument variable, which is free from confounders. We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from 2500 Korean young adults (1600 men and 900 women). Alcohol flushing was strongly associated with log transformed alcohol consumption (F = 272). In men, alcohol non-flushers were 1.41 times (95% CI 1.28–1.55) more likely to smoke 100 cigarettes in their lifetime in logistic regression analysis. Alcohol non-flushers were also 1.3 times (95% CI 1.21–1.40) more likely to become daily smokers and 1.39 times (95% CI 1.27–1.51) more likely to be current smokers than alcohol flushers. However, in an IV analysis, no causal relationships between alcohol consumption and smoking status were found. Alcohol consumption, on the other hand, was causally associated with lowering nicotine dependence and former smoking in men. Alcohol consumption determined by alcohol flushing status does not appear to be causally linked to the smoking behavior of young adults. The relationship between alcohol consumption and nicotine dependence and smoking cessation needs further study.

1. Introduction

In the 1980s, the prevalence of smoking for Korean males was estimated as close to 80% [1]. This high smoking prevalence continued until the 1990s, began to steadily decline from 1998 until 2013, and has since stagnated at the 40% level.
However, the decline in smoking prevalence has not been even across the male population. For example, the prevalence of smoking for young adult men aged 20–29 and 30–39 was estimated in 2016 to be over 40% and 50%, respectively. As a result, smoking in young adult populations is still regarded as a serious social problem [2]. In addition, the prevalence of alcohol consumption among young adults is far above the smoking prevalence, remaining over 70% for young adult males [2].
In this context, smoking and drinking have long been viewed as co-existing unhealthy lifestyle habits among young adults. When continued into the long term, as is common for addictive behaviors, smoking and drinking may lead to various chronic diseases manifesting in middle to old age, underscoring the importance of targeting interventions towards young adults [3]. Interestingly, previous studies have reported an interaction between smoking and alcohol drinking with respect to the onset of esophageal and stomach cancer [4,5,6]. It may therefore be possible that the negative impact of alcohol or smoking behaviors individually is exacerbated when both occur simultaneously, and further, that one behavior serves as a risk factor for the other. This latter possibility is supported by a recent study by Masaoka et al. [7] suggesting alcohol to be a determinant of smoking status and this is further supported by epidemiological studies showing a strong association between the genetic variant ALDH2 (implicated in development of the alcohol flushing reaction) and smoking cessation [7]. However, whilst such findings are promising, there remains a lack of research examining the extent to which the consumption of alcohol is causally relevant with respect to smoking.
Identifying a causal relationship between drinking and smoking is both clinically and politically significant, as it can provide a clear indication of the most effective targets for developing and implementing health interventions. It may therefore be possible to focus on an upstream risk factor, with an emphasis upon prevention as opposed to treatment.
One approach to assessing the causal relationship between alcohol consumption and smoking is to adopt an instrumental variable (IV) approach. Such approaches use variables as instruments to control for unmeasured confounding and allow for unbiased causal effect estimates in cases where an IV is associated with the endogenous explanatory variable of interest, independent of confounders of the explanatory and outcome variable, and independent with respect to the outcome of interest [8]. An IV satisfying these assumptions is considered to be valid. For example, Mendelian randomization (MR) studies using genetic variants as IVs [9] have provided a substantial body of evidence regarding the health impact of alcohol consumption [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Another method for inferring causality is causal mediation, which assumes that there is a mediator between exposure and outcome. However, in our study, we used the IV analysis methodology because it was assumed that there was no separate mediator between drinking and smoking. In East Asia, the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) gene, responsible for the oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetate, has been one popular candidate as an IV for MR studies [15,16], though few of these studies have centered on young adults. ALDH2 gene response is also called Asian flush or Asian glow since this phenomenon is associated with inherited deficiency in the ALDH2 enzyme among East Asians [16].
Since Yokoyama and colleagues (2003) developed an alcohol flushing questionnaire as an alternative method to identify ALDH2-deficient individuals, studies by Hsiao et al. (2019) and Shin et al. (2018) reported the validity of the alcohol flushing questionnaire [17,18]. Validity of alcohol flushing was found to be highly reliable as an instrumental variable from previous studies detecting subjects with inactive ALDH2 in the East Asian population [19,20,21]. In this study, we aimed to examine the validity of alcohol flushing, recorded using questionnaire as an IV, and investigate the causal effect of alcohol consumption on cigarette smoking specifically within the Korean young adult population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Setting and Design

Our study analyzed cross-sectional questionnaire data obtained from Korean adults aged 20–29, containing information on smoking, alcohol consumption, and potential related factors. Two thousand five hundred young adults were proportionally sampled with respect to sex, age, region, and smoking status among panels from Embrain. Korean analytics and advisory company Embrain has managed 13 million panels since 1998. Panels who were interested in our survey voluntarily participated in September 2017. All participants gave informed consent for current study. Among the 2500 young adult participants, 120 non-drinkers were excluded, with 2380 young adults (men, 1518; women, 862) remaining in the following analyses. The survey was conducted online for those who volunteered to participate, using questionnaires approved by Seoul National University Institutional Review Board (IRB) committee (IRB No. 1704/001-016).

2.2. Measurement of Variables

A range of variables are considered in our study. All questionnaires were recorded by self-report from voluntarily participants. For alcohol consumption, weekly alcohol drinking frequency and alcohol drinking amount per session was recorded. Smoking and alcohol drinking variables were selected based on the variables in Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES) or Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBS) [22,23]. Alcohol amount was calculated as an average using weekly alcohol drinking frequency and alcohol drinking amount per time, with volume and concentration of alcohol. Regarding smoking behaviors, smoking amount, smoking duration, nicotine dependency, and smoking inhalation were utilized. Nicotine dependency was measured using the Fragerstrom test [24], and participants with a score higher than 5 were defined as highly addicted smokers. Finally, information on residence, occupation, education, and income were also measured as potential confounders in estimating the association between alcohol drinking and smoking.

2.3. Alcohol Flushing

For alcohol flushing, participants were asked to answer following two questionnaires. The first question was “Do you usually get facial flushing even with a small amount of alcohol drinking?” (a) Yes, soon after first mouthful; (b) Yes, after drinking a small amount of alcohol; (c) Yes, but only after drinking large amount of alcohol; or (d) No. The second question was “After how many drinks do you usually experience hot flushes or dizziness? (a) 1 glass, (b) 2 glasses, (c) 3 glasses, (d) 4 glasses, (e) 5 glasses or more, or (f) None.”

2.4. Statistical Analysis

IV analysis requires three assumptions. Initially, we aimed to examine whether alcohol flushing status can be used as a valid IV in estimating the effect of alcohol consumption upon smoking. In relation to the first IV assumption, we assessed the extent to which alcohol flushing is associated with alcohol consumption. The association between alcohol flushing status, smoking status, and possible confounders of alcohol consumption and smoking was estimated using logistic regression models (Figure 1).
Finally, we conducted an IV analysis by using alcohol flushing status as an IV to assess the causal relationship between amount of alcohol consumed and smoking. In this study, we utilized the alcohol consumption as continuous variable for 10 g alcohol consumed per week. Association estimates are presented on the odds ratio scale. All statistical analyses were conducted with SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and Stata 14.0 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA)

3. Results

3.1. Description of the Study Population

Table 1 presents the study characteristics according to alcohol flushing status for men and women. Alcohol flushers accounted for 32.5% and 33.6% of men and women, respectively. In both the male and female subgroups, no meaningful differences were found between alcohol flushers and non-flushers in terms of age, residency, occupation, education, or income. Considering the smoking related variables, there was no substantial difference in lifetime smoking status, having smoked 100 cigarettes during lifetime, and daily smoking behavior by alcohol flushing status in men and women. There did, however, appear to be a difference by alcohol flushing group for males with a history of former smoking and nicotine dependency in men. There does appear to be a meaningful difference in amount of alcohol consumed per week between alcohol flushers and non-alcohol flushers for both men and women, as shown in Figure 2.

3.2. Alcohol Consumption and Smoking Related Variables: Association or Causal?

Table 2 shows the results from performing logistic regression and IV analyses using alcohol flushing as an IV in men. In the logistic regression analyses, the absence of alcohol flushing symptoms was positively associated with a range of smoking behaviors. Alcohol non-flushers were 1.96 times (95% confidence interval 1.56–2.45) more likely to smoke one puff of a cigarette in their lifetime and 1.67 times (95% CI 1.43–1.95) more likely to smoke one cigarette in their lifetime. However, alcohol flushing was not associated with having a history of quitting smoking.
Table 2 also displays the results from performing an IV analysis using alcohol flushing as an IV for estimating the effect of alcohol drinking on smoking habits in men. There appeared to be no evidence of other causal relationships with respect to the smoking related variables. However, in this case participants consuming greater amounts of alcohol were more likely to be former smokers (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.02–4.04), and increased alcohol intake was found to reduce nicotine dependence (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47–0.91).
Table 3 gives the results of performing the logistic regression and IV analyses above with the subset of women. As with men, the absence of alcohol flushing symptoms was associated with a majority of smoking behaviors; Alcohol non-flushers were more likely to smoke one puff of a cigarette in their lifetime (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.89–3.15) and, more likely to smoke one cigarette in their lifetime (OR 1.95, 95% CI = 1.64–2.32). However, no causal relationship was found with other smoking related variables when performing the IV analysis.

4. Discussion

Our present study aimed to examine the causal association between alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking in young adults utilizing observational and IV approaches. First, a strong association was detected between alcohol consumption and various smoking variables, such as lifetime smoking status, current smoking status, and nicotine dependency. However, the amount of alcohol consumed was not found to be causally associated with smoking status using alcohol flushing within an IV framework in men and women. Exceptionally, alcohol consumption, on the other hand, was causally associated with former smoking and lowering nicotine dependence in men.
Alcohol flushing has been used in various studies as an IV for alcohol consumption [12,15,19,21]. Yun et al. examined the validity of alcohol flushing, reporting a causal association of alcohol drinking upon coronary artery calcification [25]. However, studies specifically targeting young adults and using alcohol flushing are relatively rare.
We found strong evidence of an association between alcohol drinking and alcohol flushing symptoms, with alcohol non-flushers consuming approximately twice as much alcohol in comparison to alcohol flushers. We also found no evidence of association between alcohol flushing status and potential confounders of alcohol consumption and smoking; specifically social economic status measured using residency, occupation, education and income. The strong association between alcohol flushing status and alcohol consumption, coupled with the absence of associations between alcohol flushing and potential confounders of alcohol and smoking, therefore supports the validity of alcohol flushing status as an IV [12,13,19,21].
Several studies have investigated the association between tobacco and alcohol use [26,27]. Whilst not finding smoking to be causally associated with alcohol drinking, there appears to be a consensus that many lifestyle behaviors are connected with smoking lifestyle behaviors. Our findings agree with this perspective, with alcohol drinking being unlikely to serve as cause of smoking. Targeting alcohol cessation as an intervention would therefore only have a limited impact on smoking cessation.
If the converse is true, and smoking is a cause of alcohol drinking, it could act as the underlying mechanism behind the two co-existing lifestyles. This provides the motivation for further research. In terms of alternative mechanisms driving the co-existence of alcohol and smoking behaviors, several explanations have emerged from recent studies. One possibility is that some individuals who have a physiological predisposition to using addictive drugs, such as alcohol and tobacco, are more likely to become dual users who use various drugs at the same time. However, previous studies failed to identify this addiction mechanism [28].
Another explanation is that alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking could be determined by confounding variables. This explanation agrees with the findings of our study though there is substantial debate as to whether there is a direct causal link between the two behaviors. For example, Taylor and his colleagues suggested that heaviness of smoking does not causally influence level of alcohol consumption [29]. Social and economic factors could potentially serve as such causal determinants, particularly as the association between social smoking and alcohol drinking has been reported by numerous studies [30,31].
As highlighted above, improving health care provision for young adults is a meaningful issue. Young adult smoking is one of the most important issues with respect to public health since it can be linked to a range of negative outcomes, such as hypertension, high cholesterol, and diabetes, only presenting in later life. Therefore, clarifying and targeting the risk factors of smoking in young adult population should be a prioritized. With these issues in mind, many studies have previously reported family smoking, social norms, peer smoking, and alcohol drinking as main risk factors with respect to smoking initiation and smoking status; however, due to the lack of data accessibility, a systematic research analyzing the causal effect among these risk factors was not reported [32,33,34]. In the context of this research and contemporary health issue, our study provides a major contribution by investigating the potential the association between drinking and smoking in the young adult population using an IV approach.
Future work will focus upon replication of the findings of this study using several genetic variants, (specifically rs671 in ALDH2 and rs1229984 in ADH1B) as IVs within an MR study design. Flushing syndrome is caused by a specific SNP: rs671. However, this SNP has also been associated with smoking cessation [35]. This might be a violation of one of the assumptions of an instrumental variable (Z affects the outcome Y only through X).
Our study tried a novel attempt compared to previous studies in the following attempts. Regarding the methodology, in our knowledge, our study is the first study that used alcohol flushing as an instrumental variable to clarify the association with tobacco smoking. In terms of our study population, we focused on young adults who were not treated with interest in other studies since they showed relatively lower risk of health outcomes associated with alcohol and smoking. Since those two modifiable life factors are associated with numerous risk of chronic disease, results from our study may be used as a basic evidence for policy makers who aim to plan regulation or management for those lifestyles.
Our study has several limitations that must be considered when interpreting our results. Since we used self-reported alcohol flushing variable, we were not able to guarantee the validity of alcohol flushing compared to flushing status defined by genetic examination. Unfortunately, we cannot assess whether the responses recorded for alcohol flushing accurately reflect the shortage of the alcohol decomposing enzyme responsible using the data provided alone though the use of genetic variants can serve as a more accurate measure [36]. In this study, alcohol flushing was strongly associated with log transformed alcohol consumption (F = 272), with alcohol flushing status explaining approximately 10.2% of alcohol consumption. Therefore, power might be adequate for this study. However, we feel this issue deserves more attention considering the limited sample size. Especially considering how large the confidence intervals are, “deeply inhale tobacco”, “former smoker”, and “social smokers” show similar OR compared to the linear regression for both men and women but with very large confidential intervals. Therefore, we feel the conclusions of this study should be interpreted with cautions.

5. Conclusions

Our study has showed that whilst alcohol drinking is closely related to smoking using ordinary alcohol consumption variables, causal association was not found using alcohol flushing as an IV among Korean young adults. However, our study showed that alcohol flushing can be used as an IV that can estimate alcohol consumption free from confounding variables. Further studies with using genetic variants that can improve the validity of IV are warranted in order to verify the causal association between alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.J. and S.-i.C.; methodology, Y.J. and S.-i.C.; validation, S.-i.C., E.Y. and S.-i.C.; formal analysis, Y.J.; investigation, Y.J. and E.Y., writing, Y.J.; visualization, Y.J.; supervision, S.P. and S.-i.C.; funding acquisition, S.-i.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded (2016-317) by Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Seoul National University Institutional Review Board (IRB) committee (IRB No. 1704/001-016).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Since our study was supported by Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA), permission from KDCA is required to assess data.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016-317).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jee, S.H.; Samet, J.M.; Ohrr, H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, I.S. Smoking and Cancer Risk in Korean Men and Women. Cancer Causes Control 2004, 15, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Available online: http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr (accessed on 7 September 2021).
  3. Ben-Shlomo, Y.; Kuh, D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 31, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tanaka, F.; Yamamoto, K.; Suzuki, S.; Inoue, H.; Tsurumaru, M.; Kajiyama, Y.; Kato, H.; Igaki, H.; Furuta, K.; Fujita, H.; et al. Strong interaction between the effects of alcohol consumption and smoking on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma among individuals with ADH1B and/or ALDH2 risk alleles. Gut 2010, 59, 1457–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cui, R.; Kamatani, Y.; Takahashi, A.; Usami, M.; Hosono, N.; Kawaguchi, T.; Tsunoda, T.; Kamatani, N.; Kubo, M.; Nakamura, Y.; et al. Functional Variants in ADH1B and ALDH2 Coupled with Alcohol and Smoking Synergistically Enhance Esophageal Cancer Risk. Gastroenterology 2009, 137, 1768–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ji, Y.B.; Tae, K.; Ahn, T.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, K.R.; Park, C.W.; Park, B.L.; Shin, H.D. ADH1B and ALDH2 polymorphisms and their associations with increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the Korean population. Oral Oncol. 2011, 47, 583–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Masaoka, H.; Gallus, S.; Ito, H.; Watanabe, M.; Yokomizo, A.; Eto, M.; Matsuo, K. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Polymorphism Is a Predictor of Smoking Cessation. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2016, 19, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lawlor, D.A.; Harbord, R.M.; Sterne, J.A.C.; Timpson, N.; Smith, G.D. Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat. Med. 2008, 27, 1133–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Davey Smith, G.; Ebrahim, S. Mendelian randomization: Can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 32, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Holmes, M.V.; Dale, C.E.; Zuccolo, L.; Silverwood, R.J.; Guo, Y.; Ye, Z.; Prieto-Merino, D.; Dehghan, A.; Trompet, S.; Wong, A.; et al. Association between alcohol and cardiovascular disease: Mendelian randomisation analysis based on individual participant data. BMJ 2014, 349, g4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lawlor, D.A.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Benn, M.; Zuccolo, L.; Tybjaerg-Hansen, A.; Davey Smith, G. Exploring causal associations between alcohol and coronary heart disease risk factors: Findings from a Mendelian randomization study in the Copenhagen General Population Study. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 2519–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, L.; Smith, G.D.; Harbord, R.M.; Lewis, S.J. Alcohol Intake and Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review Implementing a Mendelian Randomization Approach. PLoS Med. 2008, 5, e52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Au Yeung, S.L.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, K.K. Moderate alcohol use and cardiovascular disease from Mendelian randomization. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Taylor, A.E.; Lu, F.; Carslake, D.; Hu, Z.; Qian, Y.; Liu, S.; Chen, J.; Shen, H.; Smith, G.D. Exploring causal associations of alcohol with cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors in a Chinese population using Mendelian randomization analysis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cho, Y.; Shin, S.Y.; Won, S.; Relton, C.L.; Davey Smith, G.; Shin, M.J. Alcohol intake and cardiovascular risk factors: A Mendelian randomization study. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Brooks, P.J.; Enoch, M.-A.; Goldman, D.; Li, T.-K.; Yokoyama, A. The Alcohol Flushing Response: An Unrecognized Risk Factor for Esophageal Cancer from Alcohol Consumption. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hsiao, J.R.; Lee, W.T.; Ou, C.Y.; Huang, C.C.; Chang, C.C.; Tsai, S.T.; Chen, K.C.; Huang, J.S.; Wong, T.Y.; Lai, Y.H.; et al. Validation of Alcohol Flushing Questionnaire to Identify ALDH 2 Status in a Case–Control Study of Head and Neck Cancer. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 43, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shin, C.M.; Kim, N.; Cho, S.-I.; Sung, J.; Lee, H.-J. Validation of Alcohol Flushing Questionnaires in Determining Inactive Aldehyde Dehydrogenase-2 and Its Clinical Implication in Alcohol-Related Diseases. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 42, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yokoyama, T.; Yokoyama, A.; Kato, H.; Tsujinaka, T.; Muto, M.; Omori, T.; Haneda, T.; Kumagai, Y.; Igaki, H.; Yokoyama, M.; et al. Alcohol flushing, alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase genotypes, and risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Japanese men. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2003, 12, 1227–1233. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yokoyama, A.; Kato, H.; Yokoyama, T.; Igaki, H.; Tsujinaka, T.; Muto, M.; Omori, T.; Kumagai, Y.; Yokoyama, M.; Watanabe, H. Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Aldehyde Dehydrogenase-2 Genotypes in Japanese Females. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2006, 30, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yun, K.E.; Chang, Y.; Yun, S.-C.; Smith, G.D.; Ryu, S.; Cho, S.-I.; Chung, E.C.; Shin, H.; Khang, Y.-H. Alcohol and coronary artery calcification: An investigation using alcohol flushing as an instrumental variable. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 950–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kweon, S.; Kim, Y.; Jang, M.-J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, K.; Choi, S.; Chun, C.; Khang, Y.-H.; Oh, K. Data Resource Profile: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 43, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, Y.; Choi, S.; Chun, C.; Park, S.; Khang, Y.-H.; Oh, K. Data Resource Profile: The Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBS). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016, 45, dyw070–1076e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Heatherton, T.F.; Kozlowski, L.T.; Frecker, R.C.; Fagerstrom, K.-O. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br. J. Addict. 1991, 86, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yeung, S.L.A.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, K.K.; Liu, B.; Zhang, W.; Lam, T.H.; Leung, G.M.; Schooling, C.M. Is aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 a credible genetic instrument for alcohol use in Mendelian randomization analysis in Southern Chinese men? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 42, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Katulanda, P.; Ranasinghe, C.; Rathnapala, A.; Karunaratne, N.; Sheriff, R.; Matthews, D. Prevalence, patterns and correlates of alcohol consumption and its’ association with tobacco smoking among Sri Lankan adults: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hayatbakhsh, M.R.; Alati, R.; Hutchinson, D.M.; Jamrozik, K.; Najman, J.M.; Mamun, A.A.; O’Callaghan, M.; Bor, W. Association of Maternal Smoking and Alcohol Consumption with Young Adults’ Cannabis Use: A Prospective Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 166, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Funk, U.; Marinelli, P.W.; Lê, A.D. Biological Processes Underlying Co-Use of Alcohol and Nicotine: Neuronal Mechanisms, Crosstolerance, and Genetic Factors. Alcohol Res. Health J. Natl. Inst. Alcohol Abus. Alcohol 2006, 29, 186–192. [Google Scholar]
  29. Taylor, M.; Rode, L.; Bjørngaard, J.; Taylor, A.E.; Bojesen, S.E.; Åsvold, B.O.; Gabrielsen, M.E.; Lewis, G.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Romundstad, P.R.; et al. Is smoking heaviness causally associated with alcohol use? A Mendelian randomization study in four European cohorts. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2018, 47, 1098–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ma, J.; Betts, N.M.; Hampl, J. Clustering of Lifestyle Behaviors: The Relationship between Cigarette Smoking, Alcohol Consumption, and Dietary Intake. Am. J. Healyh Promot. 2000, 15, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dierker, L.; Lloyd-Richardson, E.; Stolar, M.; Flay, B.; Tiffany, S.; Collins, L.; Bailey, S.; Nichter, M.; Nichter, M.; Clayton, R.; et al. The proximal association between smoking and alcohol use among first year college students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006, 81, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.; Sanderson, K.; Dwyer, T.; Venn, A.; Gall, S. Job Stress in Young Adults is Associated with a Range of Poorer Health Behaviors in the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health (CDAH) Study. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2018, 60, e117–e125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Badri, H.J.A.; Ali, M.A.K.; Ali, A.A.; Sahib, A.J. Socio-economic determinants of smoking among Iraqi adults: Data from Non-Communicable Risk Factor STEPS survey 2015. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Freedman, K.S.; Nelson, N.M.; Feldman, L.L. Smoking Initiation Among Young Adults in the United States and Canada, 1998–2010: A Systematic Review. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2011, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Masaoka, H.; Ito, H.; Gallus, S.; Watanabe, M.; Yokomizo, A.; Eto, M.; Matsuo, K. Combination of ALDH2 and ADH1B polymor-phisms is associated with smoking initiation: A large-scale cross-sectional study in a Japanese population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017, 173, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Livingston, M.D.; Xu, X.; Komro, K.A. Predictors of Recall Error in Self-Report of Age at Alcohol Use Onset. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2016, 77, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 18 11392 g001 550
Figure 1. A directed acyclic graph depicting the assumed associations for unbiased inference using IV analysis. Dashed lines represent associations required to be zero in order for assumptions 2 and 3 to be satisfied.
Figure 1. A directed acyclic graph depicting the assumed associations for unbiased inference using IV analysis. Dashed lines represent associations required to be zero in order for assumptions 2 and 3 to be satisfied.
Ijerph 18 11392 g001
Ijerph 18 11392 g002 550
Figure 2. Facial flushing status in men (left side) and women (right side), with 0 representing alcohol non-flushers and 1 representing alcohol flushers.
Figure 2. Facial flushing status in men (left side) and women (right side), with 0 representing alcohol non-flushers and 1 representing alcohol flushers.
Ijerph 18 11392 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of study subjects according to gender and alcohol flushing status.
Table 1. Characteristics of study subjects according to gender and alcohol flushing status.
Alcohol Flushing in MenAlcohol Flushing in Women
Flushers
(n = 493)		Non-Flushers
(n = 1025)		p ValueFlushers
(n = 290)		Non-Flushers
(n = 572)		p Value
Age, yMean (SD)25.1 (2.6)25.3 (2.5)0.159525.4 (2.6)25.4 (2.5)0.4400
ResidencyRural (%)36 (7.3)39 (7.9)0.681421 (7.2)28 (4.9)0.1598
OccupationProfessionals152 (30.8)277 (27.0)0.195064 (22.2)127 (22.2)0.3583
Clerical and sales282 (57.2)572 (55.8) 224 (77.3)433 (75.7)
Others59 (12.0)176 (17.2) 1 (0.5)12 (2.1)
Education<College72 (14.6)146 (14.2)0.862136 (12.5)92 (16.1)0.1980
≥College421 (85.4)879 (85.8) 254 (87.5)480 (83.9)
Income, ×10,000 won<20055 (11.1)51 (10.3)0.881328 (9.5)54 (9.5)0.6771
200–599317 (64.4)320 (64.9) 161 (55.5)335 (58.6)
≥600121 (24.5)122 (24.8) 102 (35.0)182 (31.9)
Smoking related variables
Smoke one puff of cigarette in lifetime430 (87.2)916 (89.4)0.2170227 (78.3)452 (79.0)0.8005
Smoke one cigarette in lifetime407 (82.6)852 (83.1)0.7836204 (70.3)406 (71.0)0.8466
Smoke 100 cigarettes in lifetime339 (68.8)707 (69.0)0.9331157 (54.1)305 (53.3)0.8204
Daily smokers256 (51.9)513 (50.0)0.387997 (33.5)187 (32.7)0.8234
Current smokers (daily or occasionally)326 (66.1)657 (64.1)0.4386144 (49.7)279 (48.8)0.8073
Quitting smoking19 (3.83)72 (7.07)0.039424 (8.3)49 (8.5)0.9287
High nicotine dependence132 (26.80)204 (19.91)0.010655 (18.9)86 (15.1)0.2780
Deeply inhale tobacco138 (27.90)287 (28.02)0.966457 (19.5)136 (23.8)0.2814
SD; standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Association between alcohol consumption and various smoking behaviors: logistic regression analysis and the instrumental variable (IV) analysis using alcohol flushing as an IV in men.
Table 2. Association between alcohol consumption and various smoking behaviors: logistic regression analysis and the instrumental variable (IV) analysis using alcohol flushing as an IV in men.
Smoking Related Variables Logistic Regression, per 10 g/dayIV Analysis
Yes/NoOR95% CIp ValueOR95% CIp Value
Smoke one puff of cigarette in lifetime1346/1721.961.56–2.45<0.00011.260.87–1.810.218
Smoke one cigarette in lifetime 1259/2591.671.43–1.95<0.00011.040.76–1.430.784
Smoke 100 cigarettes in life time1046/4721.411.28–1.55<0.00011.010.78–1.300.933
Daily smokers764/7541.301.21–1.40<0.00010.900.71–1.140.388
Current smokers (daily or occasionally)983/5351.391.27–1.51<0.00010.910.71–1.160.439
Quitted smoking63/9830.830.69–1.000.05022.041.02–4.040.043
High nicotine dependence237/8281.171.09–1.27<0.00010.650.47–0.910.011
Deeply inhale tobacco297/7671.101.02–1.890.0111.010.74–1.370.966
Adjusted for age, residency, education, and income level. OR; odds ratio; CI; confidence interval.
Table
Table 3. Association between alcohol consumption and various smoking behaviors: logistic regression analysis and the instrumental variable (IV) analysis using alcohol flushing as an IV in women.
Table 3. Association between alcohol consumption and various smoking behaviors: logistic regression analysis and the instrumental variable (IV) analysis using alcohol flushing as an IV in women.
Smoking Related Variables Logistic Regression, per 10 g/dayIV Analysis
Yes/NoOR95% CIp ValueOR95% CIp Value
Smoke one puff of cigarette in lifetime673/1832.441.89– 3.15<0.00011.040.78–1.380.801
Smoke one cigarette in lifetime 610/2521.951.64–2.32<0.00011.030.79–1.330.847
Smoke 100 cigarettes in life time462/4001.501.35–1.67<0.00010.970.77–1.230.820
Daily smokers284/5781.411.29–1.53<0.00010.970.76–1.240.824
Current smokers
(daily or occasionally)		423/4391.451.32–1.60<0.00010.970.77–1.230.807
Quitted smoking39/4230.870.72–1.060.98941.030.57–1.840.929
High nicotine dependence79/4041.201.07–1.340.00190.790.52–1.210.279
Deeply inhale tobacco108/3751.171.05–1.300.00411.240.84–1.820.283
Adjusted for age, residency, education, and income level. OR; odds ratio; CI; confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jee, Y.; Park, S.; Yuk, E.; Cho, S.-i. Alcohol Consumption and Cigarette Smoking among Young Adults: An Instrumental Variable Analysis Using Alcohol Flushing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111392

AMA Style

Jee Y, Park S, Yuk E, Cho S-i. Alcohol Consumption and Cigarette Smoking among Young Adults: An Instrumental Variable Analysis Using Alcohol Flushing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(21):11392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111392

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jee, Yongho, Susan Park, Eunu Yuk, and Sung-il Cho. 2021. "Alcohol Consumption and Cigarette Smoking among Young Adults: An Instrumental Variable Analysis Using Alcohol Flushing" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 21: 11392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111392

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop