The Perception of African Immigrant Women Living in Spain Regarding the Persistence of FGM
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design
2.2. Participants and Setting
2.3. Data Collection
2.4. Data Analysis
2.5. Rigor
2.6. Ethical Considerations
3. Results
3.1. A Family Ritual Symbolic of Purification
3.1.1. The Symbolic Character of Female Genital Mutilation
“Cutting is tradition. Every woman in my country is cut, even the president’s wife… all of them. It is our tradition and I want to respect it but it has brought me no good whatsoever”(P7)
“Girls are mutilated at a young age in our culture…It is a long tradition, hundreds of years old, they don’t know that they have been cut…”(P8)
“I was 8 or 9 when they did it. I have vague memories of it. Everyone was happy about it because they said that I had become a woman”(P4)
“For the last 3000 years families have believed that a girl who has not been cut is impure because what they have between their legs is impure so it must therefore be closed as proof of virginity and purity”(P1)
“Those who don’t have it are frowned upon. She is a woman who has relations with various men. It is done so that women maintain their virginity until marriage and so that they don’t like or want to have sexual relations.”(P5)
“They say that when you cut a woman, she doesn’t want to have sex, she’s not going to look for it, until her husband wants it.”(P11)
“My Dad is Muslim and he says that cutting is a good thing, the problem is the woman. My husband says that it is tradition, he doesn’t want uncut and impure woman.”(P4)
“When a woman has not been cut, they don’t consider her one of theirs. I’m not sure how to put it, for them it’s that she does not have the same value.”(P10)
3.1.2. Female Genital Mutilation as a Family Matter
“They got us dressed in white and we had to walk around the whole village, my grandmother’s village, and they took us around the neighbourhood showing everyone that we had undergone the practice, like they were celebrating it.”(P1)
“When a girl has not been cut, she is not considered one of them, (…) she does not have the same worth.”(P10)
“… I got really angry with my mother. She explained to me that in Africa women are subjected by their families. Family is incredibly important and a woman is subservient to her husband and the grandmothers who want to continue with the tradition.”(P11)
“My mother should have said no to my grandmother because she is my mother and the person responsible for me, but I suppose I understand…, she couldn’t really do anything about it.”(P6)
3.2. A System of False Beliefs and Deception in Favour of FGM
3.2.1. A Social and Cultural Substrate That Pushes Girls to Female Genital Mutilation
“It is a tradition. Before it was done on all women because it is in the Bible and the Koran. It is a tradition, when a girl is born, she has to be cut. It’s normal, normal traditional things, the elder ladies of the village perform it.”(P2)
3.2.2. Tricking Girls into Female Genital Mutilation
“They did it to me when I was a baby, when I was a few months old.”(P4)
“Before, when a girl was born, they had to commit to the tradition straight away and apply it to everyone.”(P10)
“My Mum got me dressed up and told me we were going to a birthday party.”(P6)
“Everything started one day in my grandmother’s house. I remember that… she fooled us with a special breakfast… I can’t remember what kind of breakfast it was, but it was really good.”(P1)
“In that moment I didn’t understand and I was almost frightened, but happy, I was only a young girl who had no idea about all of this. Everyone was happy and celebrating.”(P1)
“My Mum told me that she had to go to my grandmother’s house to do something. I saw a woman with a knife but I don’t remember much else, they just covered my eyes.”(P3)
“A few days afterwards, some friends came over to play and they told me that I had been cut, how do you say… that they had cut my clitoris. That’s when I found out because I hadn’t understood what had happened.”(P6)
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dilbaz, B.; Iflazoğlu, N.; Tanın, S.A. An overview of female genital mutilation. J. Turk. Soc. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 16, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grose, R.G.; Hayford, S.; Cheong, Y.F.; Garver, S.; Kandala, N.-B.; Yount, K.M. Community Influences on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in Kenya: Norms, Opportunities, and Ethnic Diversity. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2019, 60, 84–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Global Concern; UNICEF: New York, NY, USA, 2016.
- Abdalla, S.M.; Galea, S. Is female genital mutilation/cutting associated with adverse mental health consequences? A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Glob. Health 2019, 4, e001553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jungari, S.B. Female Genital Mutilation Is a Violation of Reproductive Rights of Women: Implications for Health Workers. Health Soc. Work. 2015, 41, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parlamento Europeo. Resolution of 24 March 2009 on Combating Female Genital Mutilation in the EU. In P6_TA (2009)0161 (p.9). 2009. Available online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+TA+P6-TA-2009-0161+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN (accessed on 7 December 2021).
- Van Baelen, L.; Ortensi, L.E.; Leye, E. Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2016, 21, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). Female Genital Mutilation: How many Girls Are at Risk in Spain? EIGE: Vilnius, Lithuania, 2021; Available online: https://eige.europa.eu/publications/female-genital-mutilation-how-many-girls-are-risk-spain (accessed on 7 October 2021).
- World Health Organization (WHO). Mutilación Genital Femenina; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation (accessed on 5 October 2021).
- Dustin, M. Female genital mutilation/cutting in the UK: Challenging the inconsistencies. Eur. J. Women’s Stud. 2010, 17, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lori, J.R.; Boyle, J.S. Forced migration: Health and human rights issues among refugee populations. Nurs. Outlook 2014, 63, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mahgoub, E.; Nimir, M.; Abdalla, S.; Alam ElHuda, D.; World Health Organization. Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean Effects of school-based health education on attitudes of female students towards female genital mutilation in Sudan. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2019, 25, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Small, E.; Sharma, B.; Nikolova, S.P.; Tonui, B.C. Hegemonic Masculinity Attitudes Toward Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Among a Sample of College Students in Northern and Southern Sierra Leone. J. Transcult. Nurs. 2019, 31, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbede, C.; Kio, J.; Adeyemo, O. Correlates of intention to discontinue female genital mutilation in Osun State, Nigeria: Implication for women well-being. Public Health Nurs. 2019, 36, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sabahelzain, M.M.; Eldin, A.G.; Babiker, S.; Kabiru, C.W.; Eltayeb, M. Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: A cross-sectional study. Glob. Health Res. Policy 2019, 4, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koski, A.; Heymann, J. Changes in support for the continuation of female genital mutilation/cutting and religious views on the practice in 19 countries. Glob. Public Health 2018, 14, 696–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mohammed, E.S.; Seedhom, A.E.; Mahfouz, E.M. Female genital mutilation: Current awareness, believes and future intention in rural Egypt. Reprod. Health 2018, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dixon, S.; Agha, K.; Ali, F.; El-Hindi, L.; Kelly, B.; Locock, L.; Otoo-Oyortey, N.; Penny, S.; Plugge, E.; Hinton, L. Female genital mutilation in the UK- where are we, where do we go next? Involving communities in setting the research agenda. Res. Involv. Engag. 2018, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Pastor-Bravo, M.D.M.; Almansa-Martínez, P.; Jiménez-Ruiz, I. Living with mutilation: A qualitative study on the consequences of female genital mutilation in women’s health and the healthcare system in Spain. Midwifery 2018, 66, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Masoumi, S.Z.; Jenabi, E. Investigation of prevalence and complications of female genital circumcision: A systematic and meta-analytic review study. Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 2021, 17, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millet, P.; Vinchant, M.; Sharifzadehgan, S.; Vieillefosse, S.; Hatem-Gantzer, G.; Deffieux, X. Troubles fonctionnels du bas appareil urinaire après mutilation sexuelle féminine: Revue de la littérature. Progrès En Urol. 2019, 29, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoorob, D.; Kristinsdottir, K.; Klein, T.; Seo-Patel, S. Symptomatic Clitoral Neuroma within an Epidermal Inclusion Cyst at the Site of Prior Female Genital Cutting. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 2019, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Akinbiyi, T.; Langston, E.; Percec, I. Female Genital Mutilation Reconstruction for Plastic Surgeons—A Call to Arms. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2018, 6, e1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozturk, M.K.; Zindanci, I.; Zemheri, E.; Çakır, C. The largest epidermal cyst with vitiligo lesions following female genital mutilation: A case report and literature review. Acta Dermatovenerol. Alp. Pannonica Et Adriat. 2018, 27, 211–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matanda, D.J.; Sripad, P.; Ndwiga, C. Is there a relationship between female genital mutilation/cutting and fistula? A statistical analysis using cross-sectional data from Demographic and Health Surveys in 10 sub-Saharan Africa countries. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e025355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Boghossian, A.S.; Freebody, J.; Moses, R.; Jenkins, G. Risk assessment for antenatal depression among women who have undergone female genital mutilation or cutting: Are we missing the mark? Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019, 60, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Payne, C.K.; Abdulcadir, J.; Ouedraogo, C.; Madzou, S.; Kabore, F.A.; De, E.J. Ethics Committee if the International Continence Society International continence society white paper regarding female genital mutilation/cutting. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2019, 38, 857–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buggio, L.; Facchin, F.; Chiappa, L.; Barbara, G.; Brambilla, M.; Vercellini, P. Psychosexual Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation and the Impact of Reconstructive Surgery: A Narrative Review. Health Equity 2019, 3, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adigüzel, C.; Baş, Y.; Erhan, M.D.; Gelle, M.A. The Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Experience in Somali Women: Their Wishes, Knowledge and Attitude. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2018, 84, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pastor-Bravo, M.D.M.; Almansa-Martínez, P.; Jiménez-Ruiz, I. Postmigratory Perceptions of Female Genital Mutilation: Qualitative Life History Research. J. Transcult. Nurs. 2020, 32, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulcadir, J.; Rodriguez, M.I.; Say, L. Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: An analysis. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 122, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Connelly, E.; Murray, N.; Baillot, H.; Howard, N. Missing from the debate? A qualitative study exploring the role of communities within interventions to address female genital mutilation in Europe. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e021430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Berg, R.C.; Denison, E. A Tradition in Transition: Factors Perpetuating and Hindering the Continuance of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) Summarized in a Systematic Review. Health Care Women Int. 2013, 34, 837–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thorne, S.; Stephens, J.; Truant, T. Building qualitative study design using nursing’s disciplinary epistemology. J. Adv. Nurs. 2015, 72, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tong, A.; Sainsbury, P.; Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2007, 19, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Buus, N.; Perron, A. The quality of quality criteria: Replicating the development of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2019, 102, 103452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dossett, L.A.; Kaji, A.H.; Cochran, A. SRQR and COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Studies. JAMA Surg. 2021, 156, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, S.; Jones, M.; Bressington, D.; McKenna, L.; Brown, E.; Terhaag, S.; Shrestha, M.; Al-Ghareeb, A.; Gray, R. Adherence to COREQ Reporting Guidelines for Qualitative Research: A Scientometric Study in Nursing Social Science. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2020, 19, 1609406920982145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, J.; Thoroggod, N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research; SAGE: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual. Res. Psychol. 2020, 18, 328–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meseguer, C.B.; Martínez, P.A.; Bravo, M.D.M.P.; Ruiz, I.J. La voz de las mujeres sometidas a mutilación genital femenina en la Región de Murcia. Gac. Sanit. 2014, 28, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berg, R.C.; Taraldsen, S.; Said, M.A.; Sørbye, I.K.; Vangen, S. Reasons for and Experiences with Surgical Interventions for Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review. J. Sex. Med. 2017, 14, 977–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cappa, C.; Van Baelen, L.; Leye, E. The practice of female genital mutilation across the world: Data availability and approaches to measurement. Glob. Public Health 2019, 14, 1139–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varol, N.; Turkmani, S.; Black, K.; Hall, J.; Dawson, A. The role of men in abandonment of female genital mutilation: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ormrod, J. The experience of NHS care for women living with female genital mutilation. Br. J. Nurs. 2019, 28, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scamell, M.; Ghumman, A. The experience of maternity care for migrant women living with female genital mutilation: A qualitative synthesis. Birth 2018, 46, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Njue, C.; Karumbi, J.; Esho, T.; Varol, N.; Dawson, A. Preventing female genital mutilation in high income countries: A systematic review of the evidence. Reprod. Health 2019, 16, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pashaei, T.; Ponnet, K.; Moeeni, M.; Khazaee-Pool, M.; Majlessi, F. Daughters at Risk of Female Genital Mutilation: Examining the Determinants of Mothers’ Intentions to Allow Their Daughters to Undergo Female Genital Mutilation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sunday-Adeoye, I.; Serour, G. Management of health outcomes of female genital mutilation: Systematic reviews and evidence syntheses. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 136, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vu, A.; Adam, A.; Wirtz, A.; Pham, K.; Rubenstein, L.; Glass, N.; Beyrer, C.; Singh, S. The Prevalence of Sexual Violence among Female Refugees in Complex Humanitarian Emergencies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLoS Curr. 2014, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brady, S.S.; Connor, J.J.; Chaisson, N.; Mohamed, F.S.; Robinson, B.E. Female Genital Cutting and Deinfibulation: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Research and Practice. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2019, 50, 1913–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evans, C.; Tweheyo, R.; McGarry, J.; Eldridge, J.; Albert, J.; Nkoyo, V.; Higginbottom, G. (Eds.) Improving care for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: Qualitative systematic reviews. Health Serv. Deliv. Res. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, H.M.; Shabu, S.A.; Shabila, N.P. A qualitative assessment of women’s perspectives and experience of female genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan Region. BMC Women’s Health 2019, 19, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Plaza del Pino, F. Comunicación, Cuidado Y Vida En La Diversidad. Una Propuesta De Formación Intercultural; EDUAL: Almería, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dyer, C. FGM: Mother is first person in UK to be convicted of female genital mutilation. BMJ 2019, 364, l546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Atkinson, H.G.; Geisler, A. Developing Physician Educational Competencies for the Management of Female Genital Cutting: A Call to Action. J. Women’s Health 2019, 28, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Crenshaw, K. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1989. Available online: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8 (accessed on 7 December 2021).
- Jiménez-Lasserrotte, M.; López-Domene, E.; Hernández-Padilla, J.; Fernández-Sola, C.; Fernández-Medina, I.; Faqyr, K.; Dobarrio-Sanz, I.; Granero-Molina, J. Understanding Violence against Women Irregular Migrants Who Arrive in Spain in Small Boats. Healthcare 2020, 8, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Participant | Gender | Age | Religion | Country of Origin | Age FGM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | Female | 35 | Christian | Gambia | 7 |
P2 | Female | 32 | Muslim | Senegal | months |
P3 | Female | 26 | Christian | Equatorial Guinea | 4 |
P4 | Female | 30 | Muslim | Guinea Conakri | 6 |
P5 | Female | 28 | Muslim | Gambia | 3 |
P6 | Female | 29 | Christian | Nigeria | 5 |
P7 | Female | 32 | Muslim | Burkina Faso | 1 |
P8 | Female | 34 | Muslim | Mali | 3 |
P9 | Female | 26 | Muslim | Senegal | 6 |
P10 | Female | 30 | Muslim | Mali | 2 |
P11 | Female | 27 | Muslim | Burkina Faso | 4 |
P12 | Female | 26 | Muslim | Senegal | 4 |
P13 | Female | 30 | Muslim | Mali | months |
Stage of the Interview | Topic | Content/Example Questions |
---|---|---|
Presentation | Aims | Belief that their perceptions of FGM provide an important lesson that must be known. |
Intentions | To carry out research to shed light on these perceptions. | |
Ethical aspects | Inform about: voluntary nature, confidentiality, anonymity, possibility to withdraw or not answer, permission to record. | |
Initial phase | Opening questions | Tell me about yourself and your ethnic origin. |
Development | Conversation guide | What does FGM mean to you? What does it mean for your family and community? Why does this practice persist? |
Closing | Final questions | Is there anything else that you would like to add? |
Gratitude | Thank you for your time. Your contribution will be very useful to us. | |
Offer | We remind you that you can call us should you have any questions. We will inform you about the results of our study. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Berthe-Kone, O.; Ventura-Miranda, M.I.; López-Saro, S.M.; García-González, J.; Granero-Molina, J.; Jiménez-Lasserrotte, M.d.M.; Fernández-Sola, C. The Perception of African Immigrant Women Living in Spain Regarding the Persistence of FGM. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413341
Berthe-Kone O, Ventura-Miranda MI, López-Saro SM, García-González J, Granero-Molina J, Jiménez-Lasserrotte MdM, Fernández-Sola C. The Perception of African Immigrant Women Living in Spain Regarding the Persistence of FGM. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(24):13341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413341
Chicago/Turabian StyleBerthe-Kone, Ousmane, María Isabel Ventura-Miranda, Sara María López-Saro, Jessica García-González, José Granero-Molina, María del Mar Jiménez-Lasserrotte, and Cayetano Fernández-Sola. 2021. "The Perception of African Immigrant Women Living in Spain Regarding the Persistence of FGM" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 24: 13341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413341