Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Data Collection
2.2. Procedure
2.3. Optimization of the Facility Weight of the Walk Score
2.4. Distance Attenuation Function
2.5. Green View Rate
2.6. Correction of Basic Walking Index
3. Results
3.1. Walking Coverage and Universal Walking Index
3.2. Assessment of Living Facilities Configuration
3.3. Street Greening and Integrated Evaluation
4. Discussion
4.1. Applicability for the Universal Walk Score
4.2. The Impact of Daily Life Facility Configuration on Street Walkability
4.3. Optimization of Street Walk Score Algorithm
4.4. Limitations of the Study
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization. Physical Inactivity: A Global Public Health Problem. 2017. Available online: https://www.who.int/ncds/prevention/physical-activity/inactivity-global-health-problem/en/ (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- Handy, S.L.; Boarnet, M.G.; Ewing, R.; Killingsworth, R.E. How the built environment affects physical activity—Views from urban planning. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2002, 23, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christiansen, L.B.; Cerin, E.; Badland, H.; Kerr, J.; Davey, R.; Troelsen, J.; Van Dyck, D.; Mitáš, J.; Schofield, G.; Sugiyama, T.; et al. International comparisons of the associations between objective measures of the built environment and transport-related walking and cycling: IPEN adult study. J. Transp. Health 2016, 3, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Saelens, B.E.; Handy, S.L. Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2008, 40, S550–S566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sugiyama, T.; Cerin, E.; Owen, N.; Oyeyemi, A.L.; Conway, T.L.; Van Dyck, D.; Schipperijn, J.; Macfarlane, D.J.; Salvo, D.; Reis, R.S.; et al. Perceived neighbourhood environmental attributes associated with adults’ recreational walking: IPEN Adult study in 12 countries. Health Place 2014, 28, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Owen, N.; Cerin, E.; Leslie, E.; Du Toit, L.; Coffee, N.; Frank, L.D.; Bauman, A.E.; Hugo, G.; Saelens, B.E.; Sallis, J.F. Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007, 33, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alawadi, K.; Khanal, A.; Doudin, A.; AbdelGhani, R. Revisiting transit-oriented development: Alleys as critical walking infrastructure. Transp. Policy 2021, 100, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Score, W. Walk Score Methodology. Available online: https://www.walkscore.com/methodology.shtml (accessed on 23 November 2020).
- Lwin, K.K.; Murayama, Y. Modelling of urban green space walkability: Eco-friendly walk score calculator. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2011, 35, 408–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncan, D.T.; Aldstadt, J.; Whalen, J.; Melly, S.J. Validation of Walk Scores and Transit Scores for estimating neighborhood walkability and transit availability: A small-area analysis. GeoJournal 2012, 78, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koschinsky, J.; Talen, E.; Alfonzo, M.; Lee, S. How walkable is Walker’s paradise? Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2017, 44, 343–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilderbloom, J.I.; Riggs, W.W.; Meares, W.L. Does walkability matter? An examination of walkability’s impact on housing values, foreclosures and crime. Cities 2015, 42, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cain, K.L.; Millstein, R.A.; Sallis, J.F.; Conway, T.L.; Gavand, K.A.; Frank, L.D.; Saelens, B.E.; Geremia, C.M.; Chapman, J.; Adams, M.A.; et al. Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). Soc. Sci. Med. 2014, 116, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ewing, R.; Hajrasouliha, A.; Neckerman, K.M.; Purciel-Hill, M.; Greene, W.H. Streetscape Features Related to Pedestrian Activity. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2015, 36, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, S.; Park, S.; Lee, J.S. Meso- or micro-scale? Environmental factors influencing pedestrian satisfaction. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2014, 30, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, L.J.; Dunsiger, S.I.; Marcus, B.H. Walk Score (TM) As a Global Estimate of Neighborhood Walkability. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2010, 39, 460–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Carr, L.J.; I Dunsiger, S.; Marcus, B.H. Validation of Walk Score for estimating access to walkable amenities. Br. J. Sports Med. 2010, 45, 1144–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, L. Street level urban design qualities for walkability: Combining 2D and 3D GIS measures. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2017, 64, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosso, A.L.; Harding, A.B.; Clarke, P.J.; Studenski, S.A.; Rosano, C. Associations of neighborhood walkability and walking behaviors by cognitive trajectory in older adults. Gerontologist 2021, gnab005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Yang, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhai, D.; Li, J. Comparison Study of Perceived Neighborhood-Built Environment and Elderly Leisure-Time Physical Activity between Hangzhou and Wenzhou, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Consoli, A.; Nettel-Aguirre, A.; Spence, J.C.; McHugh, T.-L.; Mummery, K.; McCormack, G.R. Associations between objectively-measured and self-reported neighbourhood walkability on adherence and steps during an internet-delivered pedometer intervention. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0242999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncan, D.T.; Aldstadt, J.; Whalen, J.; Melly, S.J.; Gortmaker, S.L. Validation of Walk Score (R) for Estimating Neighborhood Walkability: An Analysis of Four US Metropolitan Areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 4160–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrmann, T.; Boisjoly, G.; Ross, N.A.; El-Geneidy, A. The Missing Middle Filling the Gap Between Walkability and Observed Walking Behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2017, 2661, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, L.D.; Sallis, J.F.; Saelens, B.E.; Leary, L.; Cain, K.; Conway, T.L.; Hess, P.M. The development of a walkability index: Application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br. J. Sports Med. 2010, 44, 924–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Howard, E. To-Morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Duncan, D.T.; Goedel, W.C. Quantitative Methods for Measuring Neighborhood Characteristics in Neighborhood Health Research; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 57–90. [Google Scholar]
- Pliakas, T.; Hawkesworth, S.; Silverwood, R.J.; Nanchahal, K.; Grundy, C.; Armstrong, B.; Casas, J.P.; Morris, R.W.; Wilkinson, P.; Lock, K. Optimising measurement of health-related characteristics of the built environment: Comparing data collected by foot-based street audits, virtual street audits and routine secondary data sources. Place 2017, 43, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rzotkiewicz, A.; Pearson, A.L.; Dougherty, B.V.; Shortridge, A.; Wilson, N. Systematic review of the use of Google Street View in health research: Major themes, strengths, weaknesses and possibilities for future research. Health Place 2018, 52, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kelly, C.M.; Wilson, J.S.; Baker, E.A.; Miller, D.K.; Schootman, M. Using Google Street View to Audit the Built Environment: Inter-rater Reliability Results. Ann. Behav. Med. 2013, 45, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, J.; Zhao, L.; McBride, J.; Gong, P. Can you see green? Assessing the visibility of urban forests in cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natural Resources Defense Council; T.U. School of Architecture. Evaluation of the Walkability of Chinese Cities. Research on Promoting Walking Based On Street Function; NRDC: Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Long, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, S.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, L. The Large-Scale Calculation of “Walk Score” of Main Cities in China. New Archit. 2018, 3, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
- Longying and NRDC. Walkability Evaluation of Major Cities in China (Walk Score). 2020. Available online: https://geohey.com/portal/dataviz/7ee371d5e8db4ca89d5816306ecebcc5 (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Tan, S.; Cao, F.; Yang, J. The Study on Spatial Elements of Health-Supportive Environment in Residential Streets Promoting Residents’ Walking Trips. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Urban Residential Area Planning and Design Standards; MOHURD: Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Marsden, G. The evidence base for parking policies-A review. Transp. Policy 2006, 13, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, C.; Moudon, A.V. Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes. J. Phys. Act. Health 2006, 3, S77–S98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moudon, A.V.; Lee, C.; Cheadle, A.D.; Garvin, C.; Johnson, D.B.; Schmid, T.L.; Weathers, R.D.; Lin, L. Operational Definitions of Walkable Neighborhood: Theoretical and Empirical Insights. J. Phys. Act. Health 2006, 3, S99–S117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diaz, M.; Diakopoulos, N. Whose Walkability?: Challenges in algorithmically measuring subjective experience. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Glasgow, UK, 4–9 May 2019; pp. 22–126. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, W.; Ricard, R.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, W. Assessing street-level urban greenery using Google Street View and a modified green view index. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, W.; Kuzovkina, Y.A.; Weiner, D. Who lives in greener neighborhoods? The distribution of street greenery and its association with residents’ socioeconomic conditions in Hartford, Connecticut, USA. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobs, A.B. Great Streets; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993; pp. 23–27. [Google Scholar]
Administered community | Population Size | Related Content |
Over 5500 | Guanhaishan Community, Pingdu Road Community, Zhejiang Road Community, Zhongshan Road Community, Hubei Road Community | |
Below 5500 | Shanxian Road Community, Tianjin Road Community, Henan Road Community, Guangxi Road Community, Jinan Road Community | |
Business economy | The commerce and trade economy is developed, with commercial outlets on both sides of the road, and “time-honored brands” such as Chunhelou, Hongrentang, and Shengxifu are located in the jurisdiction. | |
Cultural tourism | There are many tourist attractions, such as the Zhanqiao, the Sixth Bathing Beach, the Catholic Church, Lao She Park, Guanhai Mountain, and other European-style buildings such as Wang Tongzhao, the former residence of Confucius, and the Jiaoao Governor’s Mansion. It is close to the railway station and has convenient transportation. | |
Street culture | Chess competitions held on holidays, Zhongshan chessboard, Qingdao Summer Art Festival, International Beer Festival, Shinan Spring Art Show, and others. | |
Ethnic fusion | The Han nationality in Shinan District accounts for 99.25% of the total population, and there are 24 ethnic minorities, including Manchu, Mongolian, Hui, Tibetan, Uygur, and Xibe. | |
Climate overview | Shinan District is located in the northern temperate monsoon region, with a temperate monsoon climate, with humid air, abundant rainfall, and moderate temperature. |
Facility Classification | Classification Weight | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
Education | School | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Health care | Hospital | 1 | 1.5 |
Pharmacy | 0.5 | ||
Repast | Restaurant | 1.75 | 3.5 |
Bakery/coffee shop/tea house | 1.75 | ||
Retail department store | Supermarket/mall | 1.5 | 3 |
Convenience store | 1.5 | ||
Personal leisure | Bookstore | 1 | 3.5 |
Park | 1 | ||
Sports/entertainment | 1.5 | ||
Public service | Bank/ATM | 0.75 | 2 |
Post office | 0.25 | ||
Barbershop | 1 | ||
Total | 15 |
Description of Greening Degree | Green Vision Rate (%) |
---|---|
Not green | ≤20 |
Normal green | (20–40) |
Green | (40–50) |
Very green | >50 |
Intersection Density (Pcs/km2) | Attenuation Rate (%) | Block Length (m) | Attenuation Rate (%) | Green Vision Rate (%) | Attenuation Rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
>77 | 0 | <120 | 0 | 25 (Optimal) | 0 |
58–77 | 1 | 120–150 | 1 | >25 (Comfortable street) | 1 |
47–58 | 2 | 150–165 | 2 | ||
37–47 | 3 | 165–180 | 3 | (20,25) (Normal green) | 3 |
23–35 | 4 | 180–195 | 4 | ||
<23 | 5 | >195 | 5 | <20 (Not green) | 5 |
Walk Score | Description | |
---|---|---|
90–100 | Walkers’ paradise | Daily travel can be carried out by walking |
70–89 | Very walkable | Most facilities can be reached on foot |
50–69 | Average walkability | Some facilities are within walking distance |
25–49 | Poor walkability | Fewer facilities within walking range |
0–24 | Car dependence | Almost all trips rely on cars |
Facilities | 72 HDY | YHBL | LNLY | LBXTD | PHL | WML | AKL | HXL | JSL | PKWL | SJL | YCSZ | JTLG | GHLBS | YSLXQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
School | 0.825 | 0.825 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 1.32 |
Hospital | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.55 |
Pharmacy | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Restaurant | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 |
Bakery/coffee shop/tea house | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 1.75 |
Supermarket/mall | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.32 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Convenience store | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Bookstore | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.52 | 0.84 | 0.52 | 0.87 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.84 | 1 | 1 |
Park | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 1 | 0.88 |
Sports/entertainment | 1.5 | 0.55 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Bank | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.41 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
Post office | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Barbershop | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.88 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sun, Y.; Lu, W.; Sun, P. Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031277
Sun Y, Lu W, Sun P. Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(3):1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031277
Chicago/Turabian StyleSun, Ye, Wei Lu, and Peijin Sun. 2021. "Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 3: 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031277
APA StyleSun, Y., Lu, W., & Sun, P. (2021). Optimization of Walk Score Based on Street Greening—A Case Study of Zhongshan Road in Qingdao. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031277