Kinematic Analysis of 2-Point and 3-Point Jump Shot of Elite Young Male and Female Basketball Players
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Procedure
2.3. Variables
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Differences in Categories in 2-pt Shooting
3.2. Differences in Categories in 3-pt Shooting
3.3. Differences between 2-pt and 3-pt Shooting
4. Discussion
4.1. Differences in Categories in 2-pt Shooting
4.2. Differences in Categories in 3-pt Shooting
4.3. Differences between 2-pt and 3-pt Shooting
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gómez, M.Á.; Lorenzo, A.; Sampaio, J.; Ibáñez, S.J.; Ortega, E. Game-Related Statistics that Discriminated Winning and Losing Teams from the Spanish Men’s Professional Basketball Teams. Coll. Antropol. 2008, 32, 451–456. [Google Scholar]
- Ibáñez, S.J.; García, J.; Feu, S.; Lorenzo, A.; Sampaio, J. Effects of consecutive basketball games on the game-related statistics that discriminate winner and losing teams. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2009, 8, 458–462. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lorenzo, A.; Gómez, M.Á.; Ortega, E.; Ibáñez, S.J.; Sampaio, J. Game related statistics which discriminate between winning and losing under-16 male basketball games. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2010, 9, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Oudejans, R.R.D.; Karamat, R.S.; Stolk, M.H. Effects of Actions Preceding the Jump Shot on Gaze Behavior and Shooting Performance in Elite Female Basketball Players. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2012, 7, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teams Shooting. Available online: http://stats.nba.com/teams/shooting/ (accessed on 18 October 2017).
- Ibáñez, S.J.; Sampaio, J.; Feu, S.; Lorenzo, A.; Gómez, M.A.; Ortega, E. Basketball game-related statistics that discriminate between teams’ season-long success. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2008, 8, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, S.; Bartlett, R. The relationship between basketball shooting kinematics, distance and playing position. J. Sports Sci. 1996, 14, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okazaki, V.H.A.; Rodacki, A.L.F. Increased distance of shooting on basketball jump shot. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2012, 11, 231–237. [Google Scholar]
- Erčulj, F.; Supej, M. Impact of Fatigue on the Position of the Release Arm and Shoulder Girdle over a Longer Shooting Distance for an Elite Basketball Player. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2009, 23, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rojas, F.J.; Cepero, M.; Ona, A.; Gutierrez, M. Kinematic adjustments in the basketball jump shot against an opponent. Ergonomics 2000, 43, 1651–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de Oliveira, R.F.; Huys, R.; Oudejans, R.R.D.; van de Langenberg, R.; Beek, P.J. Basketball Jump Shooting Is Controlled Online by Vision. Exp. Psychol. 2007, 54, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oudejans, R.R.D. Effects of Visual Control Training on the Shooting Performance of Elite Female Basketball Players. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2012, 7, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abdelrasoul, E.; Mahmoud, I.; Stergiou, P.; Katz, L. The Accuracy of a Real Time Sensor in an Instrumented Basketball. Procedia Eng. 2015, 112, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rupcic, T.; Antekolovic, L.; Knjaz, D.; Matkovic, B.; Cigrovski, V. Reliability Analysis of the 94 Fifty Smart Sensor Basketball. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Kinanthropology: Sport and Quality of Life; Zvonar, M., Sajdlova, Z., Eds.; Masarykova University: Brno, Czech Republic, 2016; pp. 432–438; ISBN 978-80-210-8129-1. [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins, W.G.; Marshall, S.W.; Batterham, A.M.; Hanin, J. Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009, 41, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vincent, W.J.; Weir, J.P. Statistics in Kinesiology, 4th ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-1-4504-0254-5. [Google Scholar]
- Lakens, D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front. Psychol. 2013, 4, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Richardson, J.T.E. Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educ. Res. Rev. 2011, 6, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Routledge Academic: New York, NY, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Uygur, M.; Goktepe, A.; Ak, E.; Karabork, H.; Korkusuz, F. The Effect of Fatigue on the Kinematics of Free Throw Shooting in Basketball. J. Hum. Kinet. 2010, 24, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, A.N.; Jeffreys, I. The Stretch-Shortening Cycle: Proposed Mechanisms and Methods for Enhancement. Strength Cond. J. 2010, 32, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Okazaki, V.H.A.; Rodacki, A.L.F.; Satern, M.N. A review on the basketball jump shot. Sports Biomech. 2015, 14, 190–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliott, B.C.; White, E. A kinematic and kinetic analysis of the female two point and three point jump shots in basketball. Aust. J. Sci. Med. Sport 1989, 21, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
- Okazaki, V.H.A.; Rodacki, A.L.F. Basketball jump shot performed by adults and children. Hum. Mov. 2018, 19, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khlifa, R.; Aouadi, R.; Hermassi, S.; Chelly, M.S.; Jlid, C.; Gabbett, T.J. Kinematic Adjustments in the Basketball Free Throw Performed with a Reduced Hoop Diameter Rim. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2012, 7, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Button, C.; MacLeod, M.; Sanders, R.; Coleman, S. Examining Movement Variability in the Basketball Free-Throw Action at Different Skill Levels. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2003, 74, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miller, S.; Bartlett, R.M. The effects of increased shooting distance in the basketball jump shot. J. Sports Sci. 1993, 11, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gorman, A.D.; Maloney, M.A. Representative design: Does the addition of a defender change the execution of a basketball shot? Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2016, 27, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Maarseveen, M.J.J.; Oudejans, R.R.D. Motor and Gaze Behaviors of Youth Basketball Players Taking Contested and Uncontested Jump Shots. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Podmenik, N.; Supej, M.; Kugovnik, O.; Erčulj, F. Movement of the Body’s Centre of Mass During a Jump Shot Related to the Distance from the Basket of Young Players. Kinesiol. Slov. 2015, 21, 21–33. [Google Scholar]
- Fontanella, J.J. The Physics of Basketball; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-0-8018-8513-6. [Google Scholar]
- Krause, J.; Meyer, D.; Meyer, J. Basketball Skills & Drills, 3rd ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-0-7360-6707-2. [Google Scholar]
- Knudson, D. Biomechanics of the Basketball Jump Shot—Six Key Teaching Points. J. Phys. Educ. Recreat. Dance 1993, 64, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliott, B. A kinematic comparison of the male and female two-point and three-point jump shots in basketball. Aust. J. Sci. Med. Sport 1992, 24, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
- Dobovičnik, L.; Jakovljević, S.; Zovko, V.; Erčulj, F. Determination of the Optimal Certain Kinematic Parameters in Basketball Three-Point Shooting Using the 94fifty Technology/Bestimmung Optimaler Werte Einzelner Kinematischer Parameter Für Dreipunktewürfe Im Basketball Unter Anwendung Der 94fifty-Technologie. Phys. Cult. Fiz. Kult. 2015, 69, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
- Vencurik, T.; Nykodym, J. Selected factors influencing the successfulness of shooting in women’s basketball. In Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference on Kinesiology; Dragan, M., Sporiš, G., Šalaj, S., Škegro, D., Eds.; University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology: Opatija, Croatia, 2017; pp. 428–431. [Google Scholar]
CoMDZ (cm) | SA (°) | EA (°) | PSS (s) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Efficiency | Category | M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD |
Successful | U16M | 6.5 ± 6.2 | 110.9 ± 10.4 | 35.0 ± 6.0 | 0.83 ± 0.09 |
U18M | 5.1 ± 5.8 | 113.8 ± 11.4 | 32.2 ± 3.9 | 0.83 ± 0.1 | |
U16F | 2.5 ± 6.8 | 102.7 ± 7.7 | 31.6 ± 5.4 | 0.85 ± 0.09 | |
U18F | 0.4 ± 6.4 | 104.3 ± 13.3 | 31.8 ± 5.5 | 0.85 ± 0.11 | |
Total | 4.2 ± 6.6 | 108.9 ± 11.6 | 32.9 ± 5.4 | 0.84 ± 0.1 | |
Unsuccessful | U16M | 5.1 ± 5.1 | 109.5 ± 13.8 | 34.9 ± 5.8 | 0.84 ± 0.09 |
U18M | 3.1 ± 5.2 | 113.4 ± 11.4 | 32.5 ± 5.2 | 0.84 ± 0.1 | |
U16F | 0.8 ± 5.7 | 103.3 ± 7.5 | 29.7 ± 5.1 | 0.87 ± 0.08 | |
U18F | 1.2 ± 6.4 | 107.0 ± 10.7 | 29.6 ± 6.4 | 0.85 ± 0.11 | |
Total | 2.9 ± 5.7 | 108.8 ± 12.0 | 32.2 ± 5.9 | 0.85 ± 0.09 | |
Total | U16M | 5.7 ± 5.6 bc | 110.0 ± 12.5 b | 34.9 ± 5.9 abc | 0.84 ± 0.09 |
U18M | 3.9 ± 5.5 bc | 113.6 ± 11.4 bc | 32.3 ± 4.7 | 0.84 ± 0.1 | |
U16F | 1.4 ± 6.1 | 103.1 ± 7.6 | 30.4 ± 5.2 | 0.86 ± 0.08 | |
U18F | 0.6 ± 6.3 | 105.6 ± 12 | 30.7 ± 6.0 | 0.85 ± 0.11 | |
Total | 3.5 ± 6.1 | 108.8 ± 11.8 | 32.5 ± 5.7 | 0.85 ± 0.1 |
CoMDZ (cm) | SA (°) | EA (°) | PSS (s) | CoMDX (cm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Efficiency | Category | M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD |
Successful | U16M | 1.8 ± 5.2 | 114.8 ± 16.2 | 43.7 ± 4.8 | 0.96 ± 0.12 | 18 ± 12.5 |
U18M | 0.4 ± 4.8 | 115.2 ± 14.6 | 43.1 ± 4.2 | 0.9 ± 0.04 | 13.4 ± 11.1 | |
U16F | 2.2 ± 6.3 | 103.4 ± 10.3 | 44.3 ± 4.3 | 0.93 ± 0.08 | 21.6 ± 13.9 | |
U18F | 1.3 ± 4.2 | 111.4 ± 11.8 | 46.7 ± 4.3 | 0.89 ± 0.12 | 15.9 ± 10.2 | |
Total | 1.4 ± 5.1 | 112.3 ± 14.5 | 44.0 ± 4.5 † | 0.93 ± 0.1 | 17 ± 12.1 | |
Unsuccessful | U16M | 0.2 ± 6.8 | 111.6 ± 14.5 | 42.6 ± 4.6 | 0.95 ± 0.08 | 13.4 ± 11.1 |
U18M | 0.7 ± 5.4 | 117.3 ± 11.6 | 42.4 ± 4.1 | 0.93 ± 0.06 | 14.4 ± 14.8 | |
U16F | 1.3 ± 6.5 | 99.7 ± 10.6 | 41.1 ± 4.9 | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 18.4 ± 9.3 | |
U18F | 0.9 ± 4.6 | 103.9 ± 9.5 | 44 ± 4.3 | 0.88 ± 0.11 | 24 ± 13.2 | |
Total | 0.7 ± 6.0 | 109.1 ± 13.8 | 42.4 ± 4.5 | 0.94 ± 0.08 | 16.5 ± 12.7 | |
Total | U16M | 0.7 ± 6.4 | 112.6 ± 15 a | 43 ± 4.6 | 0.95 ± 0.1 b | 14.8 ± 11.7 |
U18M | 0.6 ± 5.2 | 116.7 ± 12.4 ab | 42.6 ± 4.1 | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 14.1 ± 13.8 | |
U16F | 1.5 ± 6.4 | 100.5 ± 10.5 | 41.9 ± 4.9 | 0.96 ± 0.06 b | 19.1 ± 10.4 | |
U18F | 1.0 ± 4.5 | 105.8 ± 10.4 | 44.7 ± 4.4 | 0.88 ± 0.11 | 22 ± 12.8 | |
Total | 0.9 ± 5.8 | 110. ± 14.1 | 42.9 ± 4.6 | 0.93 ± 0.09 | 16.7 ± 12.5 |
Category | CoMDZ (cm) | SA (°) | EA (°) | PSS (s) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p | d | p | d | p | d | p | d | |
U16M | < 0.001 | 0.83 | 0.570 | −0.09 | < 0.001 | −1.35 | < 0.001 | −1.19 |
U18M | < 0.001 | 0.63 | 0.107 | −0.26 | < 0.001 | −2.23 | < 0.001 | −1.01 |
U16F | 0.913 | −0.02 | 0.111 | 0.31 | < 0.001 | −2.04 | < 0.001 | −1.32 |
U18F | 0.755 | 0.08 | 0.956 | −0.01 | < 0.001 | −2.57 | 0.248 | −0.27 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Vencúrik, T.; Knjaz, D.; Rupčić, T.; Sporiš, G.; Li, F. Kinematic Analysis of 2-Point and 3-Point Jump Shot of Elite Young Male and Female Basketball Players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030934
Vencúrik T, Knjaz D, Rupčić T, Sporiš G, Li F. Kinematic Analysis of 2-Point and 3-Point Jump Shot of Elite Young Male and Female Basketball Players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(3):934. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030934
Chicago/Turabian StyleVencúrik, Tomas, Damir Knjaz, Tomislav Rupčić, Goran Sporiš, and Feng Li. 2021. "Kinematic Analysis of 2-Point and 3-Point Jump Shot of Elite Young Male and Female Basketball Players" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 3: 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030934